Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2010-10-14 · National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Notice of information collection

476 words·~2 min read·/register/2010/10/14/2010-25811·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
Action: Notice of information collection
Citation: FR Doc. 2010-25811 · Notice (10-126)

Summary

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).

Dates

All comments should be submitted within 60 calendar days from the date of this publication.

Supplementary Information

I. Abstract Contractors performing research and development are required by statutes, NASA implementing regulations, and OMB policy to submit reports of inventions, patents, data, and copyrights, including the utilization and disposition of same. The NASA New Technology Summary Report reporting form is being used for this purpose. II. Method of Collection NASA FAR Supplement clauses for patent rights and new technology encourage the contractor to use an electronic form and provide a hyperlink to the electronic New Technology Reporting Web (eNTRe) site . This Web site has been set up to help NASA employees and parties under NASA funding agreements (i.e., contracts, grants, cooperative agreements, and subcontracts) to report new technology information directly, via a secure Internet connection, to NASA. III. Data Title: NASA FAR Supplement, Part 1827, Patents, Data, and Copyrights. OMB Number: 2700-0052. Type of review: Extension of a currently approved collection. Affected Public: Business or other for-profit, Not-for-profit institutions, Federal Government, and State, Local or Tribal Government. Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,016. Estimated Time per Response: 0.166 hour. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 3,391. Estimated Total Annual Cost: $0. IV. Request for Comments Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of NASA, including whether the information collected has practical utility; (2) the accuracy of NASA's estimate of the burden (including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including automated collection techniques or the use of other forms of information technology. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and included in the request for OMB approval of this information collection. They will also become a matter of public record. Lori Parker, NASA PRA Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. 2010-25811 Filed 10-13-10; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
1 reference not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 104-13
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Notice of information collection
Pub. L.Pub. L. 104-13
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.