Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2010-07-30 · FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION · Notices

Notices. FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

456 words·~2 min read·/register/2010/07/30/2010-18706

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION [Petition No. P1-10] Petition of Hainan P O Shipping Co., Ltd. For an Exemption From the First Sentence of Section 9(C) of the Shipping Act of 1984; Notice of Filing and Request for Comments Notice is hereby given that Hainan P O Shipping Co., Ltd. (“Petitioner”), has petitioned the Commission pursuant to Section 16 of the Shipping Act of 1984, 46 U.S.C. 40103, and 46 CFR 502.69 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, for an exemption from the first sentence of Section 9(c) of the Shipping Act, 46 U.S.C. 40703.
Petitioner is an ocean common carrier currently providing container service outside the U.S. trades. In Mid-August 2010, Petitioner will commence operations in the U.S. transpacific trades, initially serving the trades between the People's Republic of China, Vietnam, and the Republic of Korea, and the U.S. Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach and inland points via Los Angeles and Long Beach. Petitioner is a controlled carrier as defined by the Shipping Act and subject to Section 9—Controlled Carriers, 46 U.S.C. 40701-40706.
Petitioner seeks an exemption so that it can lawfully reduce its tariff rates, charges, classifications, rules or regulations effective upon publication. Petitioner also notes that the requested relief, if granted, will permit it to operate in the U.S trades on the same terms available to other ocean common carriers, including many controlled carriers that previously have been granted similar relief. In order for the Commission to make a thorough evaluation of the Petition, interested persons are requested to submit views or arguments in reply to the Petition no later than August 20, 2010.
Replies shall consist of an original and 15 copies, be directed to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., Washington, DC 20573-0001, and be served on Petitioner's counsel, Neal M. Mayer, Esq., and Paul D. Coleman, Esq., Hoppel, Mayer & Coleman, 10th Floor, 1050 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20036. One copy of the reply shall be submitted in electronic form (Microsoft Word) by e-mail to *Secretary@fmc.gov.* Please note that providing the electronic copy does not relieve the filing requirement of an original and 15 copies specified above.
The Petition will be posted on the Commission's Web site at *http://www.fmc.gov/reading/Petitions.asp.* Replies filed in response to this Petition also will be posted on the Commission's Web site at this location. Parties participating in this proceeding may elect to receive service of the Commission's issuances in this proceeding through e-mail in lieu of service by U.S. mail. A party opting for electronic service shall advise the Office of the Secretary in writing and provide an e-mail address where service can be made.
Karen V. Gregory, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2010-18706 Filed 7-29-10; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 2
2 references not yet in our index
  • 46 CFR 502.69
  • 46 USC 40701-40706
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
Cite46 CFR 502.69
Cite46 USC 40701-40706
Cites 4Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.