Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2010-06-23 · SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION · Notices

Notices. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

706 words·~3 min read·/register/2010/06/23/2010-15128

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-62290; File No. SR-OCC-2010-07] Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation; Order Granting Approval of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to Clearing Options on the CBOE Gold ETF Volatility Index June 14, 2010. I. Introduction On April 26, 2010, The Options Clearing Corporation (“OCC”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission the proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder 2 to allow OCC to add an interpretation following the introduction in Article XVII of OCC's By-Laws to clarify that OCC will clear and treat as securities options any option contracts on the CBOE Gold ETF Volatility Index.
The proposed rule change was published for comment in the **Federal Register** on May 19, 2010. 3 No comment letters were received on the proposal. This order approves the proposal. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b-4. 3 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62094 (May 13, 2010), 75 FR 28085. II. Description of the Proposal The proposed rule change will add an interpretation following the introduction in Article XVII of OCC's By-Laws to make clear that OCC will clear and treat as securities options any option contracts on the CBOE Gold ETF Volatility Index. 4 This treatment is essentially the same as that extended to other similar options that OCC currently clears. 5 4 The specific language of the new interpretation can be found on OCC's Web site at *http://www.theocc.com/about/publications/bylaws.jsp.* 5 Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 59054, 73 FR 75159 (Dec. 10, 2008) (iShares COMEX Gold Shares and iShares Silver Shares); 61591 (Feb. 25, 2010), 75 FR 9979 (Mar. 4, 2010) (ETFS Physical Swiss Gold Shares and ETFS Physical Silver Shares); 57895 (May 30, 2008), 73 FR 32066 (June 5, 2008) (SPDR Gold Trust); 61958 (Apr. 22, 2010), 75 FR 22673 (Apr. 29, 2010) (ETFS Palladium Shares And ETFS Platinum Shares).
These filings also provided that futures on the exchange-traded funds in question would be cleared and treated as security futures. In its capacity as a “derivatives clearing organization” registered as such with the CFTC, OCC filed this proposed rule change for prior approval by the CFTC pursuant to provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”) in order to foreclose potential liability based on an argument that the clearing by OCC of such options as securities options constitutes a violation of the CEA.
III. Discussion Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act requires, among other things, that the rules of a clearing agency be designed to promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions and derivative transactions. 6 By amending its By-Laws to make clear that OCC will clear and treat as securities options any option contracts on the CBOE Gold ETF Volatility Index, OCC's rule change should help clarify the jurisdictional status of such contracts and accordingly should help to promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions and of derivative transactions.
In accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding entered into between the CFTC and the Commission on March 11, 2008, and in particular the addendum thereto concerning Principles Governing the Review of Novel Derivative Products, the Commission believes that novel derivative products that implicate areas of overlapping regulatory concern should be permitted to trade in either a CFTC or Commission-regulated environment or both in a manner consistent with laws and regulations (including the appropriate use of all available exemptive and interpretive authority). 6 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
IV. Conclusion On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and in particular Section 17A of the Act 7 and the rules and regulations thereunder. 7 15 U.S.C. 78q-1. *It Is Therefore Ordered,* pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, 8 that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-OCC-2010-07) be and hereby is approved. 9 8 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). 9 In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
For the Commission by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority. 10 10 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). Florence E. Harmon, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2010-15128 Filed 6-22-10; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 4
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.