Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2010-06-11 · Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense (DoD) · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Proposed rule with request for comments

852 words·~4 min read·/register/2010/06/11/2010-14120·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense (DoD)
Action: Proposed rule with request for comments
Citation: FR Doc. 2010-14120 · 48 CFR 242

Summary

DoD proposes to remove and relocate the requirements for conducting a Contractor Insurance/Pension Review from Procedures, Guidance, and Information to the Defense Acquisition Regulation Supplement.

Dates

Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted in writing to the address shown below on or before August 10, 2010, to be considered in the formation of the final rule.

Supplementary Information

A. Background As part of a DFARS Transformation effort, Defense Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) Case 2003-D050, published at 71 FR 9273, February 23, 2006, moved requirements for Contractor Insurance/Pension Review (CIPR) from DFARS 242.7302 to Procedures, Guidance, and Information (PGI) 242.7302. This DFARS case proposes to move requirements for CIPR back to the DFARS from the PGI. The threshold and requirements for conducting a CIPR are DoD-wide policy that has a significant effect beyond the internal operating procedures of DoD. Since conduct of a CIPR impacts industry, as contractors are required to provide documentation to support the reviews, the requirements for CIPR should be located in the DFARS. B. Regulatory Flexibility Act DoD does not expect this proposed rule to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. The proposed rule merely relocates the requirements for CIPR from the PGI to the DFARS. Therefore, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has not been performed. DoD invites comments from small business concerns and other interested parties on the expected impact of this rule on small entities. DoD will also consider comments from small entities concerning the existing regulations in subparts affected by this rule in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such comments separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (DFARS Case 2009-D025) in correspondence. C. Paperwork Reduction Act The Paperwork Reduction Act (Pub. L. 96-511) applies because information collection requirements in the proposed rule at DFARS subpart 242.73 are currently approved under Office of Management and Budget Control Number 0704-0250. Relocating the requirement has no impact on the information collection requirement. List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 242 Government procurement. Ynette R. Shelkin, Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System. Therefore, DoD proposes to amend 48 CFR part 242 as follows: PART 242—CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT SERVICES 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 242 continues to read as follows: Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR chapter 1. 2. Revise section 242.7302 to read as follows: 242.7302 Requirements. (a)(1) An in-depth CIPR as described at DFARS 242.7301(a)(1) shall be conducted only when— (i) A contractor has $50 million of qualifying sales to the Government during the contractor's preceding fiscal year; and (ii) The ACO, with advice from DCMA insurance/pension specialists and DCAA auditors, determines a CIPR is needed based on a risk assessment of the contractor's past experience and current vulnerability. (2) Qualifying sales are sales for which cost or pricing data were required under 10 U.S.C. 2306a, as implemented in FAR 15.403, or that are contracts priced on other than a firm-fixed-price or fixed-price with economic price adjustment basis. Sales include prime contracts, subcontracts, and modifications to such contracts and subcontracts. (b) A special CIPR that concentrates on specific areas of a contractor's insurance programs, pension plans, or other deferred compensation plans shall be performed for a contractor (including, but not limited to, a contractor meeting the requirements in paragraph (a) of this section) when any of the following circumstances exists, but only if the circumstance(s) may result in a material impact on Government contract costs: (1) Information reveals a deficiency in the contractor's insurance/pension program. (2) The contractor proposes or implements changes in its insurance, pension, or deferred compensation plans. (3) The contractor is involved in a merger, acquisition, or divestiture. (4) The Government needs to follow up on contractor implementation of prior CIPR recommendations. (c) The DCAA auditor shall use relevant findings and recommendations of previously performed CIPRs in determining the scope of any audits of insurance and pension costs. (d) When a Government organization believes that a review of the contractor's insurance/pension program should be performed, that organization should provide a recommendation for a review to the ACO. If the ACO concurs, the review should be performed as part of an ACO-initiated special CIPR or as part of a CIPR already scheduled for the near future. [FR Doc. 2010-14120 Filed 6-10-10; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 2
4 references not yet in our index
  • 48 CFR 242
  • Pub. L. 96-511
  • 41 USC 421
  • 10 USC 2306a
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Proposed rule with request for comments
Cite48 CFR 242
Pub. L.Pub. L. 96-511
Cite41 USC 421
Cite10 USC 2306a
Cites 6Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.