Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2010-06-11 · Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Extension of public comment period

520 words·~2 min read·/register/2010/06/11/2010-14094·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Action: Extension of public comment period
Citation: FR Doc. 2010-14094 · EPA-R06-OAR-2006-0132; FRL-9161-1 · 40 CFR 52

Summary

The EPA is announcing a 14-day extension of the public comment period for the proposed “Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas; Excess Emissions During Startup, Shutdown, Maintenance, and Malfunction Activities.” As initially published in the Federal Register on May 13, 2010 (75 FR 26892), written comments on the proposal for rulemaking were to be submitted to EPA on or before June 14, 2010 (a 30-day public comment period). Since publication, EPA has received requests for additional time to submit comments. Therefore, the public comment period will now end on June 28, 2010. This extension is time-limited because the rule has to be finalized by October 31, 2010 under the terms of a settlement agreement.

Dates

The public comment period for this proposed rule is extended until June 28, 2010.

Supplementary Information

I. General Information A. Extension of Public Comment Period The proposed rule was signed on May 5, 2010, and published in the Federal Register on May 13, 2010 (75 FR 26892). The EPA has received requests for additional time to comment on the proposal. Since the 30-day public comment period would have concluded on June 14, 2010, EPA has decided to extend the comment period until June 28, 2010. This extension is time-limited because the rule must be finalized by October 31, 2010 under the terms of a settlement agreement. B. How can I get copies of this document and other related information? 1. Docket. The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA-R06-OAR-2006-0132. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically through or in hard copy at the Air Planning Section (6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. The file will be made available by appointment for public inspection in the Region 6 FOIA Review Room between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. weekdays except for legal holidays. Contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT paragraph below to make an appointment. If possible, please make the appointment at least two working days in advance of your visit. There will be a 15 cent per page fee for making photocopies of documents. On the day of the visit, please check in at the EPA Region 6 reception area at 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. 2. Electronic Access. You may access this Federal Register document electronically through the . Also, the proposed rulemaking was published in the Federal Register on May 13, 2010 and is available at . Dated: June 3, 2010. Lawrence E. Starfield, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6. [FR Doc. 2010-14094 Filed 6-10-10; 8:45 am]

Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 40 CFR 52
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Extension of public comment period
Cite40 CFR 52
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.