Notices. Scheduling of full five-year reviews concerning the countervailing duty order on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from Brazil and the antidumping duty orders on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from Brazil, Canada, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine

13,699 words·~62 min read·/register/2008/01/14/08-106·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4310-VC-M INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701-TA-417 and 731-TA-953, 954, 957-959, 961, and 962 (Review)] Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Brazil, Canada, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Scheduling of full five-year reviews concerning the countervailing duty order on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from Brazil and the antidumping duty orders on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from Brazil, Canada, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine.

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of full reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1675(c)(5)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty order on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from Brazil and the antidumping duty orders on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from Brazil, Canada, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time.

For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). EFFECTIVE DATE: January 8, 2008. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Olympia DeRosa Hand (202-205-3182), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810.

Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server ( *http://www.usitc.gov* ). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket

(EDIS)at *http://edis.usitc.gov* . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: *Background* .—On December 10, 2007, the Commission determined that responses to its notice of institution of the subject five-year reviews were such that full reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act should proceed (72 FR 73880, December 28, 2007). A record of the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements are available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission's Web site. *Participation in the reviews and public service list.* —Persons, including industrial users of the subject merchandise and, if the merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer organizations, wishing to participate in these reviews as parties must file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as provided in section 201.11 of the Commission's rules, by 45 days after publication of this notice. A party that filed a notice of appearance following publication of the Commission's notice of institution of the reviews need not file an additional notice of appearance. The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the reviews. *Limited disclosure of business proprietary information

(BPI)under an administrative protective order

(APO)and BPI service list.* —Pursuant to section 207.7(a) of the Commission's rules, the Secretary will make BPI gathered in these reviews available to authorized applicants under the APO issued in the reviews, provided that the application is made by 45 days after publication of this notice. Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as defined by 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the reviews. A party granted access to BPI following publication of the Commission's notice of institution of the reviews need not reapply for such access. A separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO. *Staff report.* —The prehearing staff report in the reviews will be placed in the nonpublic record on March 24, 2008, and a public version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.64 of the Commission's rules. *Hearing.* —The Commission will hold a hearing in connection with the reviews beginning at 9:30 a.m. on April 17, 2008, at the U.S. International Trade Commission Building. Requests to appear at the hearing should be filed in writing with the Secretary to the Commission on or before April 9, 2008. A nonparty who has testimony that may aid the Commission's deliberations may request permission to present a short statement at the hearing. All parties and nonparties desiring to appear at the hearing and make oral presentations should attend a prehearing conference to be held at 9:30 a.m. on April 9, 2008, at the U.S. International Trade Commission Building. Oral testimony and written materials to be submitted at the public hearing are governed by sections 201.6(b)(2), 201.13(f), 207.24, and 207.66 of the Commission's rules. Parties must submit any request to present a portion of their hearing testimony *in camera* no later than 7 business days prior to the date of the hearing. *Written submissions.* —Each party to the reviews may submit a prehearing brief to the Commission. Prehearing briefs must conform with the provisions of section 207.65 of the Commission's rules; the deadline for filing is April 2, 2008. Parties may also file written testimony in connection with their presentation at the hearing, as provided in section 207.24 of the Commission's rules, and posthearing briefs, which must conform with the provisions of section 207.67 of the Commission's rules. The deadline for filing posthearing briefs is April 28, 2008; witness testimony must be filed no later than three days before the hearing. In addition, any person who has not entered an appearance as a party to the reviews may submit a written statement of information pertinent to the subject of the reviews on or before April 28, 2008. On May 22, 2008, the Commission will make available to parties all information on which they have not had an opportunity to comment. Parties may submit final comments on this information on or before May 27, 2008, but such final comments must not contain new factual information and must otherwise comply with section 207.68 of the Commission's rules. All written submissions must conform with the provisions of section 201.8 of the Commission's rules; any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission's rules. The Commission's rules do not authorize filing of submissions with the Secretary by facsimile or electronic means, except to the extent permitted by section 201.8 of the Commission's rules, as amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8, 2002). Even where electronic filing of a document is permitted, certain documents must also be filed in paper form, as specified in II

(C)of the Commission's Handbook on Electronic Filing Procedures, 67 FR 68168, 68173 (November 8, 2002). Additional written submissions to the Commission, including requests pursuant to section 201.12 of the Commission's rules, shall not be accepted unless good cause is shown for accepting such submissions, or unless the submission is pursuant to a specific request by a Commissioner or Commission staff. In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission's rules, each document filed by a party to the reviews must be served on all other parties to the reviews (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. *Authority:* These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: January 8, 2008. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E8-416 Filed 1-11-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020-02-P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Investigation No. 337-TA-615 In the Matter of Certain Ground Fault Interrupters and Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (“ID”) (Order No. 7) issued by the presiding administrative law judge (“ALJ”) granting a motion to amend the complaint and notice of investigation in the above-captioned investigation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul M. Bartkowski, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone

(202)708-5432. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone

(202)205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at *http://www.usitc.gov.* The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket

(EDIS)at *http://edis.usitc.gov.* Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on

(202)205-1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This investigation was instituted on September 18, 2007, based on a complaint filed by Pass & Seymour, Inc. (“Pass & Seymour”) of Syracuse, New York. The complaint, as supplemented, alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. **1337) in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain ground fault interrupters and products containing the same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos.: 5,594,398; RE38,293; 7,154,718; 7,164,564; 7,212,386; and 7,256,973. The complaint named 15 respondents. On November 15, 2007, Pass & Seymour filed a motion to amend the complaint and the notice of investigation

(1)to remove respondent Lunar Industrial & Electrical, Inc. from the investigation;

(2)to add U.S. Patent 7,283,340 to the investigation;

(3)to make changes relating to the names, addresses, and affiliations of certain respondents; and

(4)to amend information relating to Harmonized Tariff Schedule item numbers. Respondent Wenzhou Trimone Science and Technology Electric Co. filed a response in opposition to the motion. The Commission investigative attorney did not oppose the motion. On December 6, 2007, finding good cause to amend the complaint and notice of investigation, the ALJ granted the motion by ID. No petitions for review were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in sections 210.14 and 210.42 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.14, 210.42). By order of the Commission. Issued: January 4, 2008. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E8-411 Filed 1-11-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020-02-P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337-TA-628] In the Matter of: Certain Computer Products, Computer Components and Products Containing Same; Notice of Investigation AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on December 5, 2007, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of International Business Machines Corporation of Armonk, New York. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain computer products, computer components and products containing same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,008,829; 5,249,741; and 5,371,852. The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order and cease and desist orders. ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at *http://www.usitc.gov* . The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket

(EDIS)at *http://edis.usitc.gov.* FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heidi E. Strain, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone

(202)205-2606. *Authority:* The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2007). *Scope of Investigation:* Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on January 3, 2008, *ordered that* —

(1)Pursuant to subsection

(b)of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain computer products, computer components and products containing same by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1 and 2 of U.S. Patent No. 5,008,829; claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 5,249,741; and claims 1, 8, 13, 14, 22, and 23 of U.S. Patent No. 5,371,852, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;

(2)For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served:

(a)The complainant is—International Business Machines Corporation, New Orchard Road, Armonk, New York 10504.

(b)The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: ASUSTeK Computer, Inc., 4F No. 15 Li-Te Road, Peitou Taipei, Taiwan. ASUS Computer International, 44370 Nobel Drive, Fremont, California 94538.

(c)The Commission investigative attorney, party to this investigation, is Heidi E. Strain, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and

(3)For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Theodore R. Essex is designated as the presiding administrative law judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or cease and a desist order or both directed against the respondent. By order of the Commission. Issued: January 8, 2008. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E8-412 Filed 1-11-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020-02-P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337-TA-630] In the Matter of Certain Semiconductor Chips With Minimized Chip Package Size and Products Containing Same (Iii); Notice of Investigation AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on December 7, 2007, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Tessera, Inc. of San Jose, California. Letters supplementing the complaint were filed on December 21 and 28, 2007. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain semiconductor chips with minimized chip package size and products containing same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,679,977; 6,133,627; 5,663,106; and 6,458,681. The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue exclusion orders and cease and desist orders. ADDRESSES: The complaint except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at *http://www.usitc.gov* . The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket

(EDIS)at *http://edis.usitc.gov* . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kecia J. Reynolds, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone

(202)205-2580. *Authority:* The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2007). *Scope of Investigation:* Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on January 3, 2008 *, ordered that* —

(1)Pursuant to subsection

(b)of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain semiconductor chips with minimized chip package size or products containing same by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1-4, 9, 10, and 33-35 of U.S. Patent No. 5,663,106; claims 17 and 18 of U.S. Patent No. 5,679,977; claims 1-4, 6, 9-12, 15, and 16 of U.S. Patent No. 6,133,627; and claim 4 of U.S. Patent No. 6,458,681, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;

(2)For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served:

(a)The complainant is—Tessera, Inc., 3099 Orchard Drive, San Jose, California 95134.

(b)The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: A-Data Technology Co., Ltd., 18F, No. 258, Lian Cheng Road, Chung Ho City, Taipei, Taiwan 235. A-Data Technology (U.S.A.) Co., Ltd., 3149 Skyway Court, Fremont, California 94539. Acer Inc., 8F, 88, Sec. 1, Hsin Tai Wu Road, Hsichih, Taipei, Hsien 221, Taiwan. Acer America Corp., 333 W. San Carlos Street, Suite 1500, San Jose, California 95110. Centon Electronics, Inc., 15 Argonaut, Aliso Viejo, California 92656. Elpida Memory, Inc., Sumitomo Seimei Yaesu Building 3F, 2-1, Yaesu 2-chome, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0028 Japan. Elpida Memory

(USA)Inc., 2001 Walsh Avenue, Santa Clara, California 95050. International Products Sourcing, Group, Inc., 4119 Leap Road, Hilliard, Ohio 43026. Kingston Technology Co., Inc., 17600 Newhope Street, Fountain Valley, California 92708. Nanya Technology Corporation, Hwa Ya Technology Park, 669, Fu Hsing 3rd Road, Kueishan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan. Nanya Technology Corp. U.S.A., 675 East Brokaw Road, San Jose, California 95112. Peripheral Devices & Products, Systems, Inc. d/b/a Patriot Memory, 47027 Benicia Street, Fremont, California 94538. Powerchip Semiconductor Corp., No. 12, Li-Hsin 1st Road, Hsinchu Science Park, Hsinchu, Taiwan. ProMOS Technologies Inc., No. 19, Li-Hsin Road, Hsinchu Science Park, Hsinchu, Taiwan 30078. Ramaxel Technology Ltd., 3/F-5/F, North Block, Southeast Industrial & Commercial Building, Houhai Avenue, Shekou, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China 518067. SMART Modular Technologies, Inc., 4211 Starboard Drive, Fremont, California 94538. TwinMOS Technologies Inc., No. 3, Tzu Chiang Road, Hsin-Chu Industrial District, Hu Kou Xiang, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan 303. TwinMOS Technologies USA Inc., 1649 S. Main Street, Suite 105, Milpitas, California 95035.

(c)The Commission investigative attorney, party to this investigation, is Kecia J. Reynolds, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and

(3)For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Charles E. Bullock is designated as the presiding administrative law judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. By order of the Commission. Issued: January 3, 2008. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E8-415 Filed 1-11-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020-02-P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337-TA-627] In the Matter of Certain Short Wavelength Semiconductor Lasers and Products Containing Same; Notice of Investigation AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on December 4, 2007, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Seoul Semiconductor Company, Ltd. of Seoul, Korea. A letter supplementing the complaint was filed on December 11, 2007. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain short wavelength semiconductor lasers and products containing same that infringe claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 5,321,713. The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order. ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at *http://www.usitc.gov.* The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket

(EDIS)at *http://edis.usitc.gov.* FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Juan Cockburn, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone

(202)205-2572. Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2007). *Scope of Investigation:* Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on January 3, 2008, *ordered that* —

(1)Pursuant to subsection

(b)of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain short wavelength semiconductor lasers or products containing same that infringe claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 5,321,713, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;

(2)For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served:

(a)The complainant is— Seoul Semiconductor Company, Ltd., 148-29 Kasan-Dong, Kuemchun-Gu, Seoul, 153-023, Korea.

(b)The respondent is the following entity alleged to be in violation of section 337, and is the party upon which the complaint is to be served: Nichia Corporation, 491 Oka, Kaminaka-Cho, Anan-Shi, Tokushima 774-8601, Japan.

(c)The Commission investigative attorney, party to this investigation, is Juan Cockburn, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 401Q, Washington, DC 20436; and

(3)For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Paul J. Luckern is designated as the presiding administrative law judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondent in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of the respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. By order of the Commission. Issued: January 3, 2008. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E8-410 Filed 1-11-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020-02-P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337-TA-629] In the Matter of: Certain Silicon Microphone Packages and Products Containing the Same; Notice of Investigation AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on December 6, 2007, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Knowles Electronics, LLC of Itasca, Illinois. Letters supplementing the complaint were filed on December 17 and 26, 2007. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain silicon microphone packages and products containing same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,781,231 and 7,242,089. The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainant request that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order and a cease and desist order. ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC, 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at *http://www.usitc.gov* . The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket

(EDIS)at *http://edis.usitc.gov* . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mareesa A. Frederick, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone

(202)205-3052. *Authority:* The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2007). *Scope of Investigation:* Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on January 3, 2008, ordered that—

(1)Pursuant to subsection

(b)of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain silicon microphone packages or products containing same by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1 and 2 of U.S. Patent No. 6,781,231 and claims 1, 2, 9, 10, 15, 17, 20, 28, and 29 of U.S. Patent No. 7,242,089, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;

(2)For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served:

(a)The complainant is—Knowles Electronics, LLC, 1151 Maplewood Drive, Itasca, Illinois 60143.

(b)The respondent is the following entity alleged to be in violation of section 337, and is the party upon which the complaint is to be served: MEMS Technology Berhad, Unit 810, Block A, Pusat Dagangan Phileo II, 15 Jalan SS 16/11. 46350 Petaling Jaya, Delangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.

(c)The Commission investigative attorney, party to this investigation, is Mareesa A. Frederick, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 401-O, Washington, DC 20436; and

(3)For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Carl C. Charneski is designated as the presiding administrative law judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or cease and desist order or both directed against a respondent. By order of the Commission. Issued: January 3, 2008. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E8-413 Filed 1-11-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020-02-P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701-TA-453 and 731-TA-1136-1137 (Preliminary)] Sodium Nitrite From China and Germany Determinations On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject investigations, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) determines, pursuant to section 703(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671b(a)) (the Act), that there is a reasonable indication that an industry in the United States is materially injured by reason of imports from China of sodium nitrite, provided for in subheading 2834.10 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, that are alleged to be subsidized by the Government of China. The Commission further determines, pursuant to section 733(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673b(a)), that there is a reasonable indication that an industry in the United States is materially injured by reason of imports from China and Germany of sodium nitrite, that are alleged to be sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). Commencement of Final Phase Investigations Pursuant to section 207.18 of the Commission's rules, the Commission also gives notice of the commencement of the final phase of its investigations concerning sodium nitrite from China and Germany. The Commission will issue a final phase notice of scheduling, which will be published in the **Federal Register** as provided in section 207.21 of the Commission's rules, upon notice from the Department of Commerce (Commerce) of affirmative preliminary determinations in the investigations under sections 703(b) and 733(b) of the Act, or, if the preliminary determinations are negative, upon notice of affirmative final determinations in those investigations under sections 705(a) and 735(a) of the Act. Parties that filed entries of appearance in the preliminary phase of the investigations need not enter a separate appearance for the final phase of the investigations. Industrial users and, if the merchandise under investigation is sold at the retail level, representative consumer organizations have the right to appear as parties in Commission antidumping and countervailing duty investigations. The Secretary will prepare a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the investigations. Background On November 8, 2007, a petition was filed with the Commission and Commerce by General Chemical LLC, Parsippany, NJ, alleging that an industry in the United States is materially injured or threatened with material injury by reason of subsidized imports of sodium nitrite from China, and by reason of LTFV imports of sodium nitrite from China and Germany. Accordingly, effective November 8, 2007, the Commission instituted countervailing and antidumping duty investigations Nos. 701-TA-453 and 731-TA-1136-1137 (Preliminary). Notice of the institution of the Commission's investigations and of a public conference to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the **Federal Register** of November 15, 2007 (72 FR 64241). The conference was held in Washington, DC, on November 27, 2007, and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by counsel. The Commission transmitted its determinations in these investigations to the Secretary of Commerce on December 26, 2007. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3979 (January 2008), entitled *Sodium Nitrite from China and Germany: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-453 and 731-TA-1136-1137 (Preliminary).* By order of the Commission. Issued: January 3, 2008. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E8-414 Filed 1-11-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020-02-P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [OMB Number 1103-NEW] Office of Community Oriented Policing Services; Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comments Requested ACTION: 60-Day Notice of Information Collection Under Review: Situational Policing Officer and Neighborhood Survey. The Department of Justice

(DOJ)Office of Community Oriented Policing Services

(COPS)will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget

(OMB)for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The revision of a currently approved information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. The purpose of this notice is to allow for 60 days for public comment until March 14, 2008. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. If you have comments especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact Rebekah Dorr, Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, 1100 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20530. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: —Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; —Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; —Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and —Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Overview of This Information Collection

(1)Type of Information Collection: Proposed collection; comments requested.

(2)Title of the Form/Collection: Situational Policing Officer and Neighborhood Survey.

(3)Agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the Department sponsoring the collection: None. U.S. Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.

(4)Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract: Primary: A small number of law enforcement officers and residents in the following jurisdictions: Pittsburgh, PA, Cleveland, OH, Akron, OH, and Ohio County, WV.

(5)An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time estimated for an average respondent to respond/reply: It is estimated that approximately 1,600 respondents for the neighborhood survey for an average of 15 minutes per response. It is estimated that approximately 200 respondents for the officer survey for an average of 10 minutes per response.

(6)An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the collection: The total estimated burden is 433.5 hours. If additional information is required contact: Lynn Bryant, Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Patrick Henry Building, Suite 1600, 601 D Street, NW., Washington, DC 20530. Dated: January 8, 2008. Lynn Bryant, Department Clearance Officer, PRA, Department of Justice. [FR Doc. E8-386 Filed 1-11-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-AT-P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [OMB Number 1103-0096] Office of Community Oriented Policing Services; Agency Information Collection Activities: Extension of a Previously Approved Collection, With Change; Comments Requested ACTION: 30-Day Notice of Information Collection Under Review: COPS Application Guide. The Department of Justice

(DOJ)Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS), will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget

(OMB)for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. This proposed information collection was previously published in the Federal Register Volume nn, Number nnn, page nnnnn on month, day, year, allowing for a 60 day comment period. The purpose of this notice is to allow for an additional 30 days for public comment until February 13, 2008. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. Written comments and/or suggestions regarding the items contained in this notice, especially the estimated public burden and associated response time, should be directed to The Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention Department of Justice Desk Officer, Washington, DC 20503. Additionally, comments may be submitted to OMB via facsimile to

(202)395-5806. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: —Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; —Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; —Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and —Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Overview of This Information Collection

(1)Type of Information Collection: Extension of a previously approved collection, with change.

(2)Title of the Form/Collection: COPS Application Guide.

(3)Agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the Department sponsoring the collection: None. U.S. Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.

(4)Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract: Primary: Law enforcement agencies and other public and private entities that apply for COPS Office discretionary grants or cooperative agreements will be asked to review the COPS Application Guide: Open Competitive Programs. The COPS Application Open/Competitive Guide is the result of a COPS Office business process reengineering effort aimed at streamlining as required under the grant streamlining requirements of Public Law 106-107, the Federal Financial Assistance Management Improvement Act of 1999, as well as the President's Management Agenda E-grants Initiative. This collection combines the previously approved collection COPS Application Guide: Targeted/Invited Programs (1103-0096) with the collection COPS Application Guide: Open/Competitive Programs (1103-0095).

(5)An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time estimated for an average respondent to respond/reply: It is estimated that 6,200 respondents annually will review the Guide within 1 hour.

(6)An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the collection: There are an estimated 6,200 total annual burden hours associated with this collection. If additional information is required contact: Lynn Bryant, Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Patrick Henry Building, Suite 1600, 601 D Street NW., Washington, DC 20530. Dated: January 8, 2008. Lynn Bryant, Department Clearance Officer, PRA, Department of Justice. [FR Doc. E8-387 Filed 1-11-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-AT-P OFFICE OF NATIONAL DRUG CONTROL POLICY Paperwork Reduction Act; Notice of Intent To Collect; Comment Request AGENCY: Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). ACTION: ONDCP provides opportunity for public comment concerning the collection of information to identify the State and local resources that support Student Drug Testing Programs in the nation's schools. SUMMARY: This action proposes the collection of drug control information from State Educational Agencies regarding State and local support for the Student Drug Testing Programs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background The purpose of this survey is to gain a greater understanding of state and local level support for Student Drug Testing Programs. Currently, Federal support for SDT programs is available through discretionary grants and the Safe and Drug Free Schools State formula grant (Title IV). The information that is collected will be used to gain a greater understanding of state and local level support for Student Drug Testing

(SDT)programs so as to better target scarce Federal resources. *Type of Collection:* Survey of State Educational Directors. *Title of Information Collection:* Federal Safe and Drug Free Schools State formula grant (Title IV) resources supporting Student Drug Testing Programs in the nation's schools. *Frequency:* Annually by fiscal year. *Affected Public:* Instrumentalities of state, local, and tribal educational entities. *Estimated Burden:* Minimal since State Education Agencies have pre-established reporting relationships with Local Education Agencies. LEAs receiving funds under Title IV must report on the services and activities supported by these funds. II. Special Issues for Comment ONDCP especially invites comments on:

(a)Whether the proposed collection is necessary for the proper performance of ONDCP functions, including whether the information has practical utility;

(b)ways to enhance information quality, utility, and clarity; and

(c)ways to ease the burden on respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. ADDRESSES: Address all comments in writing within 60 days to Michael Reles. Facsimile and e-mail are the more reliable means of communication. Mr. Reles facsimile number is

(202)395-5176, and his e-mail address is *merles@ondcp.eop.gov.* Mailing address is Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control Policy, Washington, DC 20503. For further information, contact Mr. Reles at

(202)395-6608. Signed at Washington, DC, on January 8, 2008. Daniel R. Petersen, Assistant General Counsel. [FR Doc. E8-451 Filed 1-11-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3180-02-P OFFICE OF NATIONAL DRUG CONTROL POLICY Paperwork Reduction Act; Notice of Intent To Collect; Comment Request AGENCY: Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). ACTION: ONDCP provides opportunity for public comment concerning the collection of information to identify the State and local resources that support Student Drug Testing Programs in the nation's schools. SUMMARY: This action proposes the collection of drug control information from State Educational Agencies regarding State and local support for the Student Drug Testing Programs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background The purpose of this survey is to gain a greater understanding of state and local level support for Student Drug Testing Programs. Currently, Federal support for SDT programs is available through discretionary grants and the Safe and Drug Free Schools State formula grant (Title IV). The information that is collected will be used to gain a greater understanding of state and local level support for Student Drug Testing

(a)Whether the proposed collection is necessary for the proper performance of ONDCP functions, including whether the information has practical utility;

(b)ways to enhance information quality, utility, and clarity; and

(202)395-6608. Signed at Washington, DC, on January 9, 2008. Edward H. Jurith, General Counsel. [FR Doc. E8-452 Filed 1-11-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3180-02-P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). ACTION: Notice of pending NRC action to submit an information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget

(OMB)and solicitation of public comment. SUMMARY: The NRC is preparing a submittal to OMB for review of continued approval of information collections under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). Information pertaining to the requirement to be submitted: 1. *The title of the information collection:* NRC Form 64, “Travel Voucher” (Part 1); NRC Form 64A, “Travel Voucher” (Part 2); and NRC Form 64B, “Optional Travel Voucher” (Part 2). 2. *Current OMB approval number:* 3150-0192. 3. *How often the collection is required:* On occasion. 4. *Who is required or asked to report:* Contractors, consultants and invited NRC travelers who travel in the course of conducting business for the NRC. 5. *The number of annual respondents:* 100. 6. *The number of hours needed annually to complete the requirement or request:* 100 hours (1 hour per form). 7. *Abstract:* Consultants, contractors, and those invited by the NRC to travel ( *e.g.* , prospective employees) must file travel vouchers and trip reports in order to be reimbursed for their travel expenses. The information collected includes the name, address, social security number, and the amount to be reimbursed. Travel expenses that are reimbursed are confined to those expenses essential to the transaction of official business for an approved trip. Submit, by March 14, 2008 comments that address the following questions: 1. Is the proposed collection of information necessary for the NRC to properly perform its functions? Does the information have practical utility? 2. Is the burden estimate accurate? 3. Is there a way to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected? 4. How can the burden of the information collection be minimized, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology? A copy of the draft supporting statement may be viewed free of charge at the NRC Public Document Room, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Room O-1 F21, Rockville, MD 20852. OMB clearance requests are available at the NRC worldwide Web site: *http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/doc-comment/omb/index.html* . The document will be available on the NRC home page site for 60 days after the signature date of this notice. Comments and questions about the information collection requirements may be directed to the NRC Clearance Officer, Margaret A. Janney (T-5 F52), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, by telephone at 301-415-7245, or by e-mail to *INFOCOLLECTS@NRC.GOV* . Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 8th day of January 2008. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Gregory Trussell, Acting NRC Clearance Officer, Office of Information Services. [FR Doc. E8-417 Filed 1-11-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Proposed Generic Communication; Implementation of Certificate of Compliance Amendments to Previously Loaded Spent Fuel Storage Casks AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of opportunity for public comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

(NRC)is proposing to issue a regulatory issue summary

(RIS)to inform addressees of requirements concerning the implementation of changes authorized by a 10 CFR Part 72 dry storage cask Certificate of Compliance

(CoC)amendment to a cask loaded under the original CoC or an earlier amendment thereto (“previously loaded cask”). The NRC will include review of this matter in future inspections to verify compliance with these requirements. This **Federal Register** notice is available through the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) under accession number ML073541293. DATES: Comment period expires March 31, 2008. Comments submitted after this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but assurance of consideration cannot be given except for comments received on or before this date. ADDRESSEES: Submit written comments to the Chief, Rulemaking, Directives and Editing Branch, Division of Administrative Services, Office of Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Mail Stop T6-D59, Washington, DC 20555-0001, and cite the publication date and page number of this **Federal Register** notice. Written comments may also be delivered to NRC Headquarters, 11545 Rockville Pike (Room T-6D59), Rockville, Maryland, between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. on Federal workdays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert A. Nelson at 301-492-3294 or by e-mail at *ran@nrc.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2007-26 Implementation of Certificate of Compliance Amendments to Previously Loaded Spent Fuel Storage Casks Addressees All general licensees under the provisions of Subpart K, of Part 72 of Title 10 of the *Code of Federal Regulations* (10 CFR) Part 72, “General License for Storage of Spent Fuel at Power Reactor Sites.” Intent The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

(NRC)is issuing this regulatory issue summary

(RIS)to inform addressees of requirements concerning the implementation of changes authorized by a 10 CFR Part 72 dry storage cask Certificate of Compliance

(CoC)amendment to a cask loaded under the original CoC or an earlier amendment thereto (“previously loaded cask”). The NRC will include review of this matter in future inspections to verify compliance with these requirements. No specific action or written response is required. Background The NRC initially considered this issue after a general licensee sought clarification about the application of a CoC amendment to a previously loaded cask. Subsequently, during the May 2007 Nuclear Energy Institute Dry Storage Information Forum, NRC staff described agency requirements for the implementation of CoC amendments to previously loaded casks. Staff told forum participants that 10 CFR Part 72 requires licensees to obtain NRC approval if licensees wish to apply any changes of a CoC amendment to a previously loaded cask, if such changes result in a change to the terms or conditions (including the technical specifications) of the CoC under which the cask was loaded. Some licensees have asserted that 10 CFR 72.48 allows them to apply some or all of the changes of a CoC amendment to a previously loaded cask without obtaining express NRC approval. This essentially, allows an “upgrade” of the CoC. NRC's position is that such an upgrade, if it involves a change to a term, condition, or specification of the CoC, would be tantamount to amending the design basis of the previously loaded cask, and as such, express NRC approval is required. Summary of Issue 10 CFR 72.210 grants the authority to store spent fuel in an independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI) at power reactor sites to persons authorized to possess or operate nuclear power reactors under the provisions of 10 CFR Part 50. Regulations at 10 CFR 72.212 set forth the conditions of such a general license, including the condition that such spent fuel must be stored in casks, the design of which is approved under the provisions of 10 CFR Part 72. The NRC issues a CoC for each approved cask design. Further, 10 CFR 72.212 requires the general licensee to notify the NRC at least 90 days before the first storage of spent fuel under the general license. 1 Thereafter, the licensee must register the use of each cask with the NRC no later than 30 days after using that cask to store spent fuel. In addition, the licensee must provide certain information, including the cask certificate number, model number, and identification number. 2 Regulations at 10 CFR 72.212 require that licensees “[p]erform written evaluations, prior to use, that establish that: [The] conditions set forth in the Certificate of Compliance have been met.” 3 The NRC's position is that the phrase “prior to use” means before the cask is loaded with spent nuclear fuel. 1 10 CFR 72.212(b)(1)(i). 2 10 CFR 72.212(b)(1)(ii). 3 10 CFR 72.212(b)(2)(i)(A). Regulations at 10 CFR 72.212 also require that any changes made to the written evaluation required by that section must be made in accordance with 10 CFR 72.48(c), the NRC regulation governing changes, tests, and experiments made by a licensee or a certificate holder to a spent fuel storage cask design. 4 Regulations at 10 CFR 72.48(c) permit a licensee to make changes to a cask design, without obtaining express NRC approval if such changes do not require, “a change in the terms, conditions, or specifications incorporated in the CoC.” 5 4 10 CFR 72.212(b)(ii). 5 10 CFR 72.48(c)(1)(ii)(B). If the CoC holder or a general licensee (through the CoC holder) desires to amend the CoC, such that the amendment results in a change to the terms, conditions, or specifications of the CoC, then the CoC holder must submit a proposed CoC amendment to NRC. Such an amendment must be approved by NRC before it can be effective. 6 Amendments for each approved cask design are listed in 10 CFR 72.214. 6 10 CFR 72.244 and 72.246. The NRC's practice is to consider each CoC amendment as a new design basis. Thus, each CoC amendment requires an NRC rulemaking before the amendment is effective. 7 Each CoC amendment is considered a separate and distinct CoC, accompanied by its own certificate (setting forth terms, conditions, and specifications) and safety evaluation report. Moreover, an amendment to a CoC may not amend all previous CoC amendments; thus, each succeeding amendment does not necessarily encompass all previous amendments. 7 54 FR 19379, 19380 (May 5, 1989) (“Storage casks certified in the future will be routinely added to the listing in § 72.214 through rulemaking procedures”). Further, a previously loaded cask is bound by the terms, conditions, and specifications of the CoC under which the cask was loaded. The applicable NRC regulation states that the licensee shall: “Maintain a copy of the Certificate of Compliance and documents referenced in the certificate for each cask model used for storage of spent fuel, until use of the cask model is discontinued. The licensee shall comply with the terms and conditions of the certificate.” 8 8 10 CFR 72.212(b)(7). Therefore, a licensee seeking to implement changes from a later CoC amendment to a previously loaded cask must obtain NRC approval if the changes alter the terms and conditions of the CoC under which the cask was loaded. NRC approval would be in the form of an exemption. 9 Specifically, the licensee would seek an exemption from the requisite provisions of 10 CFR 72.212 and 72.214, namely:

(a)10 CFR 72.212(a)(2) (i.e., general license limited to storage of spent fuel in casks approved under the provisions of this part);

(b)10 CFR 72.212(b)(2)(i)(A) (i.e., perform written evaluations before use establishing that conditions set forth in the CoC have been met);

(d)10 CFR 72.214 (i.e., list of each approved CoC and CoC amendment). As an example, NRC granted an exemption from these regulations to a licensee, allowing the licensee to implement a change approved in Amendment 2 to CoC 1014, for casks loaded under Amendment 1 at the licensee's ISFSI. 10 9 10 CFR 72.7 (“The Commission may, upon application by any interested person or upon its own initiative, grant such exemptions from the requirements of the regulations in this part as it determines are authorized by law and will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security and are otherwise in the public interest”). 10 71 FR 70551 (December 5, 2006). Some general licensees have asserted that 10 CFR 72.48 provides a basis to apply CoC amendment changes to a previously loaded cask, without express NRC approval, even if such changes result in a change to the terms, conditions, or specifications of the CoC under which the cask was loaded. The NRC does not interpret 10 CFR 72.48 (nor 10 CFR 72.212) to allow for such a cask upgrade without express NRC approval. The only reference to 10 CFR 72.48 in 10 CFR 72.212 is that the licensee “shall evaluate any changes to written evaluations required by [10 CFR 72.212(b)(2)(i)] using the requirements of § 72.48(c).” 11 Section 72.48(c) does not expressly refer to previously loaded casks. It also does not appear to contemplate a licensee's application of a newer CoC amendment's changes, either in whole or in part, to a previously loaded cask without NRC approval. Section 72.48(c) refers only to “cask design as described in the [final safety analysis report] FSAR.” 12 11 10 CFR 72.212(b)(2)(ii). Section 72.212(b)(2)(i)(A)-(C) requires the licensee to perform written evaluations, before cask use, that:

(a)establish that the conditions set forth in the CoC have been met;

(b)the cask storage pads and areas have been designed to adequately support static and dynamic loads of the stored casks; and

(c)the requirements of 10 CFR 72.104 have been met (10 CFR 72.104 concerns limiting radiation exposure from ISFSI operations). 12 10 CFR 72.48(c)(1). The October 4, 1999, Statement of Consideration to the rule that revised 10 CFR 72.48 explained the purpose of 10 CFR 72.48(c) as establishing the conditions that a licensee must meet to:

(a)Make changes to cask design as described in the FSAR;

(b)make changes to the procedures as described in the FSAR; or

(c)conduct tests or experiments not described in the FSAR, without prior NRC approval. 13 Specifically, those conditions are that the change, test, or experiment will not require a change in the technical specifications, terms, conditions or specifications incorporated in the CoC, or will not meet any of the criteria in 10 CFR 72.48 paragraph (c)(2). 14 Failure to meet these conditions will require the licensee to seek NRC approval. By these criteria, any “upgrade” to the design basis of a previously loaded cask that requires a change to the terms, conditions, or specifications of that cask's CoC will require express NRC approval before the “upgrade” can be implemented. 13 64 FR 53582, 53609 (October 4, 1999). 14 Paragraph (c)(2) of 10 CFR 72.48 lists additional criteria which, if triggered, require a licensee or certificate holder to obtain NRC approval for the desired change, test, or experiment, e.g., the change, test, or experiment results “in more than a minimal increase in the frequency of occurrence of an accident previously evaluated in the FSAR (as updated).” 10 CFR 72.48(c)(2)(i). Certainly, upon NRC approval of a new CoC amendment for a particular cask model, a licensee can load an empty cask of that model under that amendment, provided the loading is otherwise in accordance with 10 CFR 72.212. A previously loaded cask, however, relies upon an earlier design basis, and the licensee's use of that previously loaded cask is bounded by the terms, conditions, and specifications of the CoC under which that cask was loaded. Backfit Discussion This RIS only provides clarification of 10 CFR part 72, subparts L and K requirements. This RIS does not impose a regulatory staff position or interpretation of the Commission's rules that is either new or different from a previously applicable position. Further, this RIS requires no action or written response. Any addressee action in accordance with the information contained in this RIS is strictly voluntary. Thus, under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.109 and 72.62 this RIS does not constitute a backfit. Consequently, the staff did not perform a backfit analysis. **Federal Register** Notification A notice of opportunity for public comment on this RIS was published in the **Federal Register** (xx FR xxxxx), on {January xx, 2008}. Comments were received from {indicate the number of commentors by type}. The staff considered all comments. The staff's evaluation of the comments is publicly available through NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System under Accession No. ML #########. Congressional Review Act This RIS is not a rule as designated by the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801-808), and therefore it is not subject to the Act. Paperwork Reduction Act Statement This RIS does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). Existing requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), approval number 3150-0011, which expires on June 30, 2010, and 3150-0132, which expires on April 30, 2008. Public Protection Notification The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid OMB control number. Contact Please direct any questions about this matter to the technical contact listed below or to the appropriate regional office. Michael J. Case, Director, Division of Policy and Rulemaking, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. E. William Brach, Director, Division of Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. *Technical Contact:* Robert A. Nelson, NMSS,

(301)492-3294. *Enclosure:* “Recently Issued FSME/NMSS Generic Communications.” End of Draft Regulatory Issue Summary. Documents may be examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the NRC's Public Document Room at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland. Publicly available records will be accessible electronically from the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading Room on the Internet at the NRC Web site, *http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/ADAMS/index.html* . If you do not have access to ADAMS or if you have problems in accessing the documents in ADAMS, contact the NRC Public Document Room

(PDR)reference staff at 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-4737 or by e-mail to *pdr@nrc.gov* . Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 21st day of December 2007. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Thomas W. Alexion, Acting Chief, Generic Communications Branch, Division of Policy and Rulemaking, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. E8-424 Filed 1-11-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 50-151] Notice of the Issuance of License Amendment No. 15 for the University of Illinois Nuclear Research Laboratory Triga Research Reactor and the Opportunity To Request a Hearing AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of the issuance of license amendment No. 15 and the opportunity to request a hearing. DATES: A request for a hearing must be filed by March 10, 2008. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas McLaughlin, Project Manager, Materials Decommissioning Branch, Division of Waste Management and Environmental Protection, Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555. Telephone:

(301)415-5869; fax number:

(301)415-5369; e-mail: *tgm@nrc.gov* . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Introduction The Nuclear Regulatory Commission

(NRC)has issued a license amendment to Facility Operating License R-115 that allows decommissioning of the University of Illinois's (University's or licensee's) Nuclear Research Laboratory

(NRL)Advanced Teaching Research Isotope General Atomic (TRIGA) Mark II nuclear research reactor located on the campus of the University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana in the city of Urbana, Illinois. By letters dated March 28, 2006 (See ADAMS ML060900623), and August 20, 2007 (See ADAMS ML072550089), the licensee submitted a Decommissioning Plan

(DP)in accordance with 10 CFR 50.82(b)(1), in order to dismantle the TRIGA Reactor, to dispose of its component parts and radioactive material, and to decontaminate the facilities in accordance with the proposed DP to meet the Commission's unrestricted release criteria. After the Commission verifies that the release criteria have been met, Facility Operating License No. R-115 will be terminated. The University of Illinois ceased operations of the NRL TRIGA reactor on August 6, 1998, and it was placed in a Safe Storage (SAFSTOR) condition. On August 18, 2004, the reactor fuel was removed and shipped to the U.S. Department of Energy's Idaho National Laboratory. A “Notice and Solicitation of Comments Pursuant to 10 CFR 20.1405 and 10 CFR 50.82(b)(5) Concerning Proposed Action to Decommission the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Nuclear Reactor Laboratory” was published in the **Federal Register** on August 1, 2006 (71 FR 43528), and in the Champaign County, Illinois daily newspaper, *The News-Gazette* , on August 3, 2006. No comments were received. The University of Illinois is planning unrestricted use for the area that would be released. The NRC Final Rule on License Termination, 10 CFR 20.1402, provides radiological criteria for release of a site for unrestricted use. Release criteria for unrestricted use is a maximum Total Effective Dose Equivalent

(TEDE)of 25 mrem per year from residual radioactivity above background and doses as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA). The results of the final status survey will be used to demonstrate that the predicted dose to a member of the public from any residual radioactivity does not exceed the 25 mrem per year dose limit. The NRC will perform inspections and if necessary a confirmatory survey to verify that the decommissioning activities and the final status survey results are acceptable. Based on the review of the specific proposed activities associated with the dismantling and decontamination of the NRL, which includes the TRIGA Reactor, the staff has determined that the proposed action will not increase the probability or consequences of accidents. No changes are being made in the types of any effluents that may be released off site, and there will be no significant increase in occupational or public radiation exposure above those during the operation of the facility. Therefore, the staff concludes that there are no significant radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action. II. Opportunity to Request a Hearing The NRC hereby provides notice that this is a proceeding on an application for a license amendment regarding the decommissioning of the University of Illinois NRL test reactor. Any person whose interest may be affected by this proceeding and who desires to participate as a party must file a request for a hearing and, a specification of the contentions which the person seeks to have litigated in the hearing, in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule, which the NRC promulgated in August, 2007, 72 FR 49139 (Aug. 28, 2007). The E-Filing rule requires participants to submit and serve documents over the internet or in some cases to mail copies on electronic storage media. Participants may not submit paper copies of their filings unless they seek a waiver in accordance with the procedures described below. To comply with the procedural requirements of E-Filing, at least five

(5)days prior to the filing deadline, the petitioner/requestor must contact the Office of the Secretary by e-mail at *HEARINGDOCKET@NRC.GOV* , or by calling

(301)415-1677, to request

(1)a digital identification

(ID)certificate, which allows the participant (or its counsel or representative) to digitally sign documents and access the E-Submittal server for any proceeding in which it is participating; and/or

(2)creation of an electronic docket for the proceeding (even in instances in which the petitioner/requestor (or its counsel or representative) already holds an NRC-issued digital ID certificate). Each petitioner/requestor will need to download the Workplace Forms Viewer TM to access the Electronic Information Exchange (EIE), a component of the E-Filing system. The Workplace Forms Viewer TM is free and is available at *http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/install-viewer.html* . Information about applying for a digital ID certificate is available on NRC's public Web site at *http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/apply-certificates.html* . Once a petitioner/requestor has obtained a digital ID certificate, had a docket created, and downloaded the EIE viewer, it can then submit a request for hearing or petition for leave to intervene. Submissions should be in Portable Document Format

(PDF)in accordance with NRC guidance available on the NRC public Web site at *http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html.* A filing is considered complete at the time the filer submits its documents through EIE. To be timely, an electronic filing must be submitted to the EIE system no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on the due date. Upon receipt of a transmission, the E-Filing system time-stamps the document and sends the submitter an e-mail notice confirming receipt of the document. The EIE system also distributes an e-mail notice that provides access to the document to the NRC Office of the General Counsel and any others who have advised the Office of the Secretary that they wish to participate in the proceeding, so that the filer need not serve the documents on those participants separately. Therefore, applicants and other participants (or their counsel or representative) must apply for and receive a digital ID certificate before a hearing request/petition to intervene is filed so that they can obtain access to the document via the E-Filing system. A person filing electronically may seek assistance through the “Contact Us” link located on the NRC Web site at *http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html* or by calling the NRC technical help line, which is available between 8:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday. The help line number is

(800)397-4209 or locally,

(301)415-4737. Participants who believe that they have a good cause for not submitting documents electronically must file a motion, in accordance with 10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper filing requesting authorization to continue to submit documents in paper format. Such filings must be submitted by:

(1)First class mail addressed to the Office of the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff; or

(2)courier, express mail, or expedited delivery service to the Office of the Secretary, Sixteenth Floor, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville, Pike, Rockville, Maryland, 20852, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff. Participants filing a document in this manner are responsible for serving the document on all other participants. Filing is considered complete by first-class mail as of the time of deposit in the mail, or by courier, express mail, or expedited delivery service upon depositing the document with the provider of the service. Non-timely requests and/or petitions and contentions will not be entertained absent a determination by the Commission, the presiding officer, or the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board that the petition and/or request should be granted and/or the contentions should be admitted based on a balancing of the factors specified in 10 CFR 2.309(c)(1)(i)-(c)(1)(viii). To be timely, filings must be submitted no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on the due date. Documents submitted in adjudicatory proceedings will appear in NRC's electronic hearing docket which is available to the public at *http://ehd.nrc.gov/EHD_Proceeding/home.asp* , unless excluded pursuant to an order of the Commission, an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, or a Presiding Officer. Participants are requested not to include social security numbers in their filings. Copyrighted works, except for limited excerpts that serve the purpose of the adjudicatory filings and would constitute a Fair Use application, should not be included in the submission. The formal requirements for documents contained in 10 CFR 2.304(c)-(e) must be met. If the NRC grants an electronic document exemption in accordance with 10 CFR 2.302(g)(3), then the requirements for paper documents, set forth in 10 CFR 2.304(b) must be met. In accordance with 10 CFR 2.309(b), a request for a hearing must be filed by March 10, 2008. In addition to meeting other applicable requirements of 10 CFR 2.309, the general requirements involving a request for a hearing filed by a person other than an applicant must state: 1. The name, address, and telephone number of the requester; 2. The nature of the requester's right under the Act to be made a party to the proceeding; 3. The nature and extent of the requester's property, financial or other interest in the proceeding; 4. The possible effect of any decision or order that may be issued in the proceeding on the requester's interest; and 5. The circumstances establishing that the request for a hearing is timely in accordance with 10 CFR 2.309(b). In accordance with 10 CFR 2.309(f)(1), a request for hearing or petitions for leave to intervene must set forth with particularity the contentions sought to be raised. For each contention, the request or petition must: 1. Provide a specific statement of the issue of law or fact to be raised or controverted; 2. Provide a brief explanation of the basis for the contention; 3. Demonstrate that the issue raised in the contention is within the scope of the proceeding; 4. Demonstrate that the issue raised in the contention is material to the findings that the NRC must make to support the action that is involved in the proceeding; 5. Provide a concise statement of the alleged facts or expert opinions which support the requester's/petitioner's position on the issue and on which the requester/petitioner intends to rely to support its position on the issue; and 6. Provide sufficient information to show that a genuine dispute exists with the applicant on a material issue of law or fact. This information must include references to specific portions of the application (including the applicant's environmental report and safety report) that the requester/petitioner disputes and the supporting reasons for each dispute, or, if the requester/petitioner believes the application fails to contain information on a relevant matter as required by law, the identification of each failure and the supporting reasons for the requester's/petitioner's belief. In addition, in accordance with 10 CFR 2.309(f)(2), contentions must be based on documents or other information available at the time the petition is to be filed, such as the application, supporting safety analysis report, environmental report or other supporting document filed by an applicant or licensee, or otherwise available to the petitioner. On issues arising under the National Environmental Policy Act, the requester/petitioner shall file contentions based on the applicant's environmental report. The requester/petitioner may amend those contentions or file new contentions if there are data or conclusions in the NRC draft or final environmental impact statement; and environmental assessment or any supplements relating thereto, that differ significantly from the data or conclusions in the applicant's documents. Otherwise, contentions may be amended or new contentions filed after the initial filing only with leave of the presiding officer. Each contention shall be given a separate numeric or alpha designation within one of the following groups: 1. *Technical* —primarily concerns issues relating to matters discussed or referenced in the Safety Evaluation Report for the proposed action. 2. *Environmental* —primarily concerns issues relating to matters discussed or referenced in the Environmental Report for the proposed action. 3. *Emergency Planning* —primarily concerns issues relating to matters discussed or referenced in the Emergency Plan as it relates to the proposed action. 4. *Physical Security* —primarily concerns issues relating to matters discussed or referenced in the Physical Security Plan as it relates to the proposed action. 5. *Miscellaneous* —does not fall into one of the categories outlined above. If the requester/petitioner believes a contention raises issues that cannot be classified as primarily falling into one of these categories, the requester/petitioner must set forth the contention and supporting bases, in full, separately for each category into which the requester/petitioner asserts the contention belongs with a separate designation for that category. Requesters/petitioners should, when possible, consult with each other in preparing contentions and combine similar subject matter concerns into a joint contention, for which one of the co-sponsoring requesters/petitioners is designated the lead representative. Further, in accordance with 10 CFR 2.309(f)(3), any requester/petitioner that wishes to adopt a contention proposed by another requester/petitioner must do so, in accordance with the E-Filing rule, within ten days of the date the contention is filed, and designate a representative who shall have the authority to act for the requester/petitioner. In accordance with 10 CFR 2.309(g), a request for hearing and/or petition for leave to intervene may also address the selection of the hearing procedures, taking into account the provisions of 10 CFR 2.310. III. Further Information For further details with respect to the proposed action, see the licensee's letters dated March 28, 2006 (See ADAMS ML060900623), August 20, 2007 (See ADAMS ML072550089), the Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact (See ADAMS ML073020387), and the Safety Evaluation Report (See ADAMS ML073330022), which are available for public inspection, and can be copied for a fee, at the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Public Document Room (PDR), located at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland 20852. The NRC maintains an Agency-wide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), which provides text and image files of NRC(s public documents. These documents may be accessed through the NRC(s Public Electronic Reading Room on the internet at *http://www.nrc.gov.* Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who have problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS may contact the PDR reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737 or by e-mail at *pdr@nrc.gov.* Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 2nd day of January, 2008. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Keith I. McConnell, Deputy Director, Decommisssioning and Uranium Recovery Licensing Directorate, Division of Waste Management and Environmental Protection, Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs. [FR Doc. E8-418 Filed 1-11-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Sunshine Act Meeting; Notice Agency Holding the Meetings: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. DATES: Week of January 14, 2008. PLACE: Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. STATUS: Public and Closed. ADDITIONAL MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Week of January 14, 2008 Monday, January 14, 2008 10 a.m. Discussion of Adjudicatory Issues (Closed—Ex.10). Tuesday, January 15, 2008 9:25 a.m. Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) a. PG&E Co. (Diablo Canyon ISFSI), Docket No. 72-26-ISFSI, San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace's Contention and Request for Hearing Re Diablo Canyon Environmental Assessment Supplement (Tentative). b. Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Pilgrim Watch's Appeal of Interlocutory Board Order Summarily Disposing of Contention 3 (SAMAs) (LBP-07-13). *The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change on short notice. To verify the status of meetings call (recording)—(301) 415-1292. Contact person for more information: Michelle Schroll,

(301)415-1662. The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet at: *http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/policy-making/schedule.html.* The NRC provides reasonable accommodation to individuals with disabilities where appropriate. If you need a reasonable accommodation to participate in these public meetings, or need this meeting notice or the transcript or other information from the public meetings in another format (e.g., braille, large print), please notify the NRC's Disability Program Coordinator, Rohn Brown, at 301-415-2279, TDD: 301-415-2100, or by e-mail at *REB3@nrc.gov.* Determinations on requests for reasonable accommodation will be made on a case-by-case basis. This notice is distributed by mail to several hundred subscribers; if you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to the distribution, please contact the Office of the Secretary, Washington, DC 20555 (301-415-1969). In addition, distribution of this meeting notice over the Internet system is available. If you are interested in receiving this Commission meeting schedule electronically, please send an electronic message to *dkw@nrc.gov.* Dated: January 7, 2008. R. Michelle Schroll, Office of the Secretary. [FR Doc. 08-106 Filed 1-10-08; 2:15 pm]

Connectionstraces to 25

Traces to 25 documents

U.S. Code

CFR

8 references not yet in our index

19 CFR 201
19 CFR 207
5 CFR 1320.10
Pub. L. 106-107
10 CFR 72
10 CFR 50
5 USC 801-808
44 USC 3501-3520

Citation graph

cites case law

Notices

Scheduling of full five-year reviews concerning the countervailing duty order on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from Brazil and the antidumping duty orders on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from Brazil, Canada, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine

Cite19 CFR 201

Cite19 CFR 207

Cite5 CFR 1320.10

Cites 33 · showing 12Cited by 0 across 0 sources