Notices. Notice of advisory committee meeting

4,273 words·~19 min read·/register/2008/01/11/08-93

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Office of the Secretary Reserve Forces Policy Board

(RFPB)AGENCY: Department of Defense; Office of the Secretary of Defense Reserve Forces Policy Board. ACTION: Notice of advisory committee meeting. SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (5 U.S.C., Appendix, as amended), the Sunshine in the Government Act of 1976 (5 U.S.C. 552b, as amended), and 41 CFR 102-3.150, the Department of Defense announces the following Federal advisory committee meeting: *Name of Committee:* Reserve Forces Policy Board (RFPB). *Date:* January 29-30, 2008. *Time:*

(29th)8 a.m.-4:30 p.m.;

(30th)8 a.m.-3 p.m. *Location:* Meeting address

(29th)Maryland Emergency Management Agency, Camp Fretterd Military Reservation, 5401 Rue Saint Lo Drive, Reisterstown, MD 21136;

(30th)Baltimore Marriott Inner Harbor Hotel at Camden Yards, 110 South Eutaw St., Baltimore, MD 21201. Mailing address is Reserve Forces Policy Board, 7300 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-7300. *Purpose of the Meeting:* An open quarterly meeting of the Reserve Forces Policy Board. *Agenda:* Discussion of homeland security and other issues relevant to the Reserve Components. *Meeting Accessibility:* Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b, as amended, and 41 CFR 102-3.140 through 102-3.165, and the availability of space this meeting is open to the public. To request a seat, contact the DFO in advance at 703-697-4486, or by e-mail, *marjorie.davis@osd.mil* and/or *donald.ahern@osd.mil* . *Written Statements:* Pursuant to 41 CFR 102-3.105(j) and 102-3.140, the public or interested organizations may submit written statements to the membership of the Reserve Forces Policy Board at any time or in response to the stated agenda of a planned meeting. Written statements should be submitted to the Reserve Forces Policy Board's Designated Federal Officer. The Designated Federal Officer's contact information can be obtained from the GSA's FACA Database— *https://www.fido.gov/facadatabase/public.asp* .” Written statements that do not pertain to a scheduled meeting of the Reserve Forces Policy Board may be submitted at any time. However, if individual comments pertain to a specific topic being discussed at a planned meeting then these statements must be submitted no later than five business days prior to the meeting in question. The Designated Federal Officer will review all submitted written statements and provide copies to all the committee members. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Col Marjorie Davis, Designated Federal Officer,

(703)697-4486 (Voice),

(703)614-0504 (Facsimile), *marjorie.davis@osd.mil* . Mailing address is Reserve Forces Policy Board, 7300 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-7300. Dated: January 4, 2007. C.R. Choate, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. [FR Doc. E8-381 Filed 1-10-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001-06-P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Department of the Army Availability of Non-Exclusive, Exclusive License or Partially Exclusive Licensing of U.S. Patent Concerning Polymer-Template Complex Produced by Enzymatic Polymerization AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: In accordance with 37 CFR 404.6, announcement is made of the availability for licensing of U.S. Patent No. U.S. 7,309,582 entitled “Polymer-Template Complex Produced by Enzymatic Polymerization” issued December 18, 2007. This patent has been assigned to the United States Government as represented by the Secretary of the Army. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jeffrey DiTullio at U.S. Army Soldier Systems Center, Kansas Street, Natick, MA 01760, Phone;

(508)233-4184 or E-mail: *Jeffrey.Ditullio@natick.army.mil.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Any licenses granted shall comply with 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR part 404. Brenda S. Bowen, Army Federal Register Liaison. [FR Doc. E8-369 Filed 1-10-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3710-08-P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers Notice of Availability for the Final Environmental Impact Statement for Widening of the Freeport Ship Channel in Freeport, Brazoria County, TX AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DOD. ACTION: Notice of availability. SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Galveston District announces the release of the Final Environmental Impact Statement

(FEIS)and the public comment period, and the availability of the Final General Conformity Determination for the Brazos River Harbor Navigation District's (Port of Freeport) proposed widening of the Freeport Harbor Ship Channel. DATES: The USACE Galveston District will be accepting written public comments on the FEIS through February 11, 2008. All comments must be postmarked by February 11, 2008. ADDRESSES: You may send written comments to the USACE, Galveston District, Attn: Sam Watson, P.O. Box 1229, Galveston, TX 77553-1229. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions about the proposed action and FEIS can be answered by Mr. Sam Watson,

(409)766-3946. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Authority: This Federal Action is in consideration of a Department of the Army Permit application for work under section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C.403), section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) and Section 103 of the Marine Protection and Sanctuaries Act (MPRSA) (33 U.S.C. 1413). *Background:* In April 2005, Port of Freeport submitted a Department of Army Permit Application to widen portions of the Freeport Harbor Jetty Channel and all of the Freeport Harbor Entrance Channel from 400 feet

(ft)to 600 ft. It was determined that an Environmental Impact Statement would be required for the proposed project. Since the November 29, 2005 Scoping Meeting, the consulting firm of PBS&J, under the direction of the Galveston District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), prepared Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements for the proposed project. The DEIS was made available for a 60-day comment period on November 9, 2006. A public hearing and workshop was held December 6, 2006 in Freeport, Texas. Comments received during the comment period and at the public hearing have been considered in the evaluation of the project and incorporated into the FEIS. The FEIS is now available for public review and comment. *Project Description:* Port of Freeport proposes to widen portions of the Freeport Ship Channel. The project includes widening the Freeport Harbor Jetty Channel beginning at Channel Station 63+35 with a gradual widening, at the authorized depth, up to an additional 150 feet

(ft)for about 1,835 ft to Channel Station 45+00. From that point to Channel Station 40+00 the widening would be less gradual from the additional 150 ft to an additional 200 ft. Through the rest of the Jetty Channel and to the end of the Freeport Harbor Entrance Channel (Channel Station −260+00), the channel would be widened an additional 200 ft. The length of channel proposed for widening is about 6.1 miles, of which 5.7 miles would be widened by 200 ft. The project depth will remain the same at 45 ft in the Jetty Channel and 47 ft in the Entrance Channel. The widening would generate approximately 3.2 million cubic yards

(mcy)of new dredged material. Approximately 2.9 mcy of the new work material would consist of clay material and about 300,000 cubic yards

(cy)would consist of silty/sand material. If approved by EPA and by USACE under section 102 and 103 of MPRSA, an ocean dredged material disposal site (ODMDS) previously designated as a one-time use site would be redesignated for placement of the 2.9 mcy of clay/silt material. The 300,000 cy of silty/sand material would be used beneficially and placed on Quintana Beach in front of the Seaway upland confined placement area (UPCA). The beach on either side of this location has been enhanced through Texas General Land Office

(GLO)or other programs, but no material was placed in front of the Seaway UPCA. Placement of the material in this location would provide some protection from erosion for the Seaway UPCA, which is an active placement area that has not been used for approximately 6 years because of concerns regarding erosion of the beachfront levee. *Availability of Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS):* Pursuant to section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act

(NEPA)of 1969, as amended and as implemented by the Council on Environmental Quality (40 CFR parts 1500-1508) a FEIS for the proposed Freeport Channel Widening has been filed with the EPA and is being made available to Federal, State, and local agencies and all interested parties. The FEIS can be viewed at *http://www.swg.usace.army.mil/reg/pn.asp.* Copies of the FEIS are available by contacting Mr. Sam Watson. In addition, copies of the FEIS are available for viewing at the following libraries: Brazoria County Library System, Catherine H. Threadgill, County Librarian, 451 N Velasco, Angleton, TX 77515. Brazoria Library, Jerry Measells, Librarian, 620 S. Brooks, Brazoria, TX 77422 . Clute Library, Carolyn Weatherly, Librarian, 215 N. Shanks, Clute, TX 77531 . Freeport Library, Marge Janke, Librarian, 410 Brazosport Blvd., Freeport, TX 77541. Lake Jackson Library, Nancy Hackney, 250 Circle Way, Lake Jackson, TX 77566. *Final General Conformity Review:* Pursuant to section 176 of the Clean Air Act Amendments

(CAAA)of 1990, a Final General Conformity Determination has been filed with the EPA and Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

(TCEQ)and is being made available to Federal, State and local air quality agencies and all interested parties for the proposed Freeport Channel Widening. Copies of the Final General Conformity Determination are available by contacting Mr. Sam Watson. In addition, copies of the Final General Conformity Determination (Appendix G to the FEIS) are available for viewing, along with the FEIS, at the libraries listed above. *Section 102/103:* The Environmental Protection Agency

(EPA)is charged with developing ocean dumping criteria to be used in evaluating permit applications under section 102(a) of the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act (MPRSA). Section 103 of MPRSA authorizes USACE to permit the placement of dredged material within an ODMDS, subject to EPA concurrence and use of EPA's dumping criteria. For the proposed widening project, USACE would authorize the continued use of the maintenance material ODMDS and the one-time placement of new work material in a previously designated site under section 103, pending EPA concurrence that the criteria continue to be met and that analysis meets EPA guidelines. Additional information regarding the Section 103 authorization is included in the FEIS (primarily in Appendix C). *Other Agency Authorizations:* Texas Coastal Zone consistency certification is required. The applicant has stated that the project is consistent with the Texas Coastal Management Program goals and policies and will be conducted in a manner consistent with said Program. In January 2007 the Coastal Coordination Council provided a letter noting that the proposed action is consistent with the Texas Coastal Management Program goals and policies (Appendix I). *National Register of Historic Places:* The staff archaeologist has reviewed the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places, lists of properties determined eligible, and other sources of information. The following is current knowledge of the presence or absence of historic resources and the effects of the proposed project upon these properties: A remote sensing survey of the Freeport Harbor Channel was performed by PBS&J in March and April, 2005 and a close-order survey was performed in February 2006. A total of eleven anomalies having potential historic significance were located in areas of potential impact during the initial inventory. Six of those anomalies were identified as areas that were of potential historic significance during the second inventory. Because these six anomalies occur within areas that would be impacted by bottom disturbing activities, they were surveyed by diving and/or probing to confirm whether or not they are significant archeological sites. None of the anomalies was identified as a cultural resource. In March 2007 the State Historic Preservation Officer

(SHPO)concurred that no further investigation was needed on the areas cleared by diving and that the proposed action may proceed (Appendix E). *Threatened and Endangered Species:* A Biological Assessment was prepared and was presented to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service

(NMFS)in the DEIS. Consultation with FWS regarding nesting sea turtles and piping plover was completed informally. NMFS has reviewed the Biological Assessment

(BA)and has prepared a Biological Opinion

(BO)outlining the measures to be taken to avoid and minimize potential sea turtle takes, particularly during hopper dredging activities. NMFS' finding was that the proposed action is likely to adversely affect but is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of loggerhead, hawksbill, leatherback, Kemp's ridley, or green sea turtles. *Essential Fish Habitat:* Consultation for Essential Fish Habitat of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act was initiated in November 2005 via the workshop prior to the public scoping meeting. Letters were also sent to the NMFS in February and May, 2006. Our initial determination is that the proposed action would not have a substantial adverse impact on Essential Fish Habitat

(EFH)or Federally managed fisheries in the Gulf of Mexico. NMFS has reviewed the analysis provided in the DEIS and concurred with the finding that the proposed placement of dredged material will not significantly affect EFH and that no further consultation is required (Appendix I). *Public Interest Review Factors:* The application will be reviewed in accordance with 33 CFR 320-330, the Regulatory Programs of USACE, and other pertinent laws, regulations and executive orders. The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefits, which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal, must be balanced against reasonably foreseeable detriments associated with the proposal. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal will be considered. These include, but are not limited to: dredged material management, air quality, shoreline erosion, economics, general environmental concerns, historic resources, protected species, navigation, recreation, water and sediment quality, energy needs, safety, hazardous materials, and, in general, the welfare of the people. *Solicitation of Comments:* USACE is soliciting comments from the public, Federal, State, and local agencies and officials, Indian tribes, and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by USACE to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments will be considered in the evaluation of impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments will be used in the preparation of the Record of Decision pursuant to NEPA. Comments are also used to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity. Brenda S. Bowen, Army Federal Register Liaison Officer. [FR Doc. E8-377 Filed 1-10-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3710-52-P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers Intent To Prepare a Draft Feasibility Study and Environmental Impact Statement for Modification of the Coos Bay Navigational Channel, Coos County, OR AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DOD. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), Portland District will be the lead agency for a combined Draft Feasibility Study/Environmental Impact Statement (FS/EIS) for Coos Bay Channel Modifications in Coos County, Oregon. The FS/EIS is being prepared by the Oregon International Port of Coos Bay

(Port)under the authority granted by section 203 of the Water Resources Development Act

(WRDA)of 1986. DATES: All parties are invited to participate in the scoping process to determine the range of issues and alternatives to be addressed. A public scoping meeting will be held on Thursday, January 24, 2008, from 4-8 p.m. at the City of North Bend Community Center, 222 Broadway Street, North Bend, OR 97459. In addition, written comments will also be accepted until February 15, 2008, at the address listed below or at the project Web site: *http://www.CoosBayChannelEIS.com.* The Corps expects the Draft FS/EIS to be made available to the public in March 2009. A public hearing will be held during the public comment period for the Draft FS/EIS. ADDRESSES: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Programs and Project Management Division, Planning Branch, P.O. 2946, Portland, OR 97208-2946. FOR FUTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Eric Bluhm, who can be reached by telephone at

(503)808-4759, by fax at

(503)808-4736, or by e-mail at *eric.v.bluhm@usace.army.mil.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 1. *Project Site and Background Information.* The project site is in Coos Bay, located on the central/south coast of Oregon. The Coos Bay Federal Navigation Project was originally authorized by the River and Harbor Act of March 1879. The Federal Navigation Project was last modified by the Corps in 1997, with a channel configuration of approximately 37 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the ocean inlet to a railroad bridge at River Mile

(RM)9.2, and continuing at 400 feet wide upstream to RM 15.0. 2. *Proposed Action.* The proposed Federal actions are to modify the Coos Bay Navigational Channel from the entrance at the Pacific Ocean to the railroad bridge located at approximately river mile

(RM)9.2 and to provide ecosystem restoration in the vicinity of Coos Bay. The channel would be deepened and widened to accommodate large container vessels, and a vessel turning basin would be added for vessel maneuvering. Maintenance dredging of the channel and inlet, and possible modifications to the jetties would also be part of the Federal proposed action. Dredged material could be disposed at a variety of locations including ocean, nearshore, and at the shoreline. Other, non-Federal but inter-dependent and inter-related actions proposed by the Port include developing an inter-modal container terminal on the North Spit of Coos Bay and making improvements to the railway corridor from the North Spit to Eugene, Oregon to transport goods off-loaded from container vessels. 3. *Purpose of and Need for the Project.* The purposes of the proposed Federal action are:

(1)To respond to growing needs for capacity for large container vessels at ports on the West Coast of the U.S.;

(2)to provide economic benefits to the national economy by accommodating large container vessels, thereby reducing costs of transporting goods among Pacific Rim countries and maintaining U.S. competitiveness in the global marketplace;

(3)to improve security for international movement of goods by developing an additional facility for large container vessels in a new location on the U.S. West Coast;

(4)to improve safety and efficiency of navigation in the Coos Bay Navigational Channel by providing a larger area for vessel handling and maneuvering; and

(5)to have a net beneficial effect on the estuarine ecosystem in the vicinity of Coos Bay. The project is needed to accommodate large container vessels, which are used by Pacific Rim shippers transporting a wide variety of consumer goods as well as import production commodities for manufacturing firms, and U.S. produced goods for export. The volume of container traffic has increased significantly during the past ten years, and growth is expected to remain strong. Ocean carriers are responding to the growth opportunities by using larger and larger vessels. Currently, the average vessel calling at U.S. West Coast ports carries 6,500 TEUs (20-foot equivalent units), but vessels capable of carrying 12,000 TEUs are becoming more common. The larger vessels can transport containers more efficiently and at lower costs than smaller vessels. For navigation safety, a navigational channel should be at least 10 percent deeper than the draft of the largest vessels that utilize the channel, as well as wide enough to allow safe vessel maneuvering. Existing Coos Bay port facilities are not accessible to many larger ships because of depth and width limitations in the navigational channel. In addition to deep-draft harbors, large container vessels require ports with terminals that are large enough to accommodate the containers once they are off-loaded, and that are connected to a railway system to move the containers on land. Currently, only five ports on the U.S. west coast (Los Angeles, Long Beach and Oakland, California; and Tacoma and Seattle, Washington) can accommodate these large container vessels, and additional capacity is needed. Container vessel traffic will likely exceed the capacity of existing terminals by 2015, if not sooner. In addition, should one of the existing deep-draft ports be significantly damaged (for example, by a natural disaster), it could have a major impact on the national economy. Coos Bay is geographically separated from the other deep-draft ports and, therefore, would be unlikely to be damaged by the same event affecting another major West Coast port. Past development and resource extraction within and near Coos Bay have negatively affected the local ecosystem. Impacts have included habitat degradation and loss, declines in fish and wildlife populations, spread of invasive species, and diminished water quality, among others. Ecosystem restoration is needed to offset the effects of the proposed channel modifications and development, as well as some of the effects of past actions. 5. *Alternatives.* In addition to a no action alternative (no modifications to the Coos Bay Navigational Channel other than for maintenance) the FS/EIS will evaluate alternatives with channel depths at increments between the currently authorized 37-foot depth and a depth of 51 feet. 6. *Issues.* Numerous potential environmental issues will be addressed in the FS/EIS, and additional issues may be identified during the scoping process. Issues initially identified include:

(a)Impacts on biological resources, including species listed under Federal and State Endangered Species Acts and State sensitive species.

(b)Geological issues, including dredging and stabilization of fill areas;

(c)Impacts on water and sediment quality;

(d)Land use and planning issues;

(e)Impacts on traffic and transportation systems, including marine navigation, railroads, roads, and the Southwest Oregon Regional Airport at North Bend;

(f)Social and economic impacts;

(g)Potential noise impacts;

(h)Impacts on air quality;

(i)Impacts on public facilities and services;

(j)Impacts on visual resources;

(k)Public health and safety issues;

(l)Impacts on recreation;

(m)Cultural Resources; and

(n)Cumulative effects. 7. *Coordination.* The proposed action is being coordinated with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the National Marine Fisheries Service

(NMFS)under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act. Consultation will also be done with NMFS under section 305(b)(2) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act concerning Essential Fish Habitat, Marine Mammal Protection Act. Consultation will also be done with the State Historic Preservation Officer. 8. *Other Environmental Review and Consultation.* The proposed action will involve evaluation for compliance with guidelines pursuant to section 404(b) of the Clean Water Act; application (to the State of Oregon) for Water Quality Certification pursuant to section 401 of the Clean Water Act; certification of state lands, easements, and rights of way; and determination of Coastal Zone Management Act consistency. Dated: December 21, 2007. Thomas E. O'Donovan, Col, En, Commanding. [FR Doc. E8-367 Filed 1-10-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3710-AR-P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers Estuary Habitat Restoration Council; Open Meeting AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD. ACTION: Notice of open meeting. SUMMARY: In accordance with section 105(h) of the Estuary Restoration Act of 2000, (Title I, Pub. L. 106-457), announcement is made of the forthcoming meeting of the Estuary Habitat Restoration Council. The meeting is open to the public. DATES: The meeting will be held January 29, 2008, from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. ADDRESSES: The meeting will be in room 3M60/70 in the GAO building located at 441 G Street, NW., Washington, DC. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Ellen Cummings, Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC 20314-1000,

(202)761-4750. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Estuary Habitat Restoration Council consists of representatives of five agencies. These agencies are the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of Agriculture, and Army. The duties of the Council include, among others, soliciting, reviewing, and evaluating estuarine habitat restoration project proposals, and submitting to the Secretary of the Army a prioritized list of projects recommended for construction. Agenda topics will include decisions on recommending additional proposals to the Secretary of the Army for funding, a brief update on projects previously recommended and funded and the recent amendments to the Estuary Restoration Act. Security measures require that persons interested in attending the meeting must pre-register with us before 2 p.m., January 25, 2008. We cannot guarantee access for requests received after that time. To pre-register, please contact Ellen Cummings by telephone or send an e-mail to *estuary.restoration@usace.army.mil.* When leaving a voice mail message or sending an e-mail please provide the name of the individual attending, the company or agency represented, and a telephone number, in case there are any questions. The public should enter on the “G” Street side of the GAO building. All attendees are required to show photo identification and must be escorted to the meeting room by Corps personnel. Attendee's bags and other possessions are subject to being searched. All attendees arriving between one-half hour before and one-half hour after 2 p.m. will be escorted to the meeting. Those who are not pre-registered and/or arriving later than the allotted time will be unable to attend the public meeting. Brenda S. Bowen, Army Federal Register Liaison Officer. [FR Doc. E8-374 Filed 1-10-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3710-92-P ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION Sunshine Act Notice AGENCY: United States Election Assistance Commission. ACTION: Notice of public meeting. Date and Time: Thursday, January 17, 2008, 10 a.m.-2 p.m. Place: U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 1225 New York Ave., NW, Suite 150, Washington, DC 20005, (Metro Stop: Metro Center). Agenda: Commission will receive briefings on the following: FY2008 Appropriations; EAC Standards Board, EAC Board of Advisors; EAC Technical Development Guidelines Committee; Election Data Collection Grant Program. Commissioners will consider and vote on the following: Changes to the National Voter Registration Form; Disclaimer Proposal to State Instructions Portion of the NVRA Form; EAC Organizational Chart. EAC will install new Officers for 2008. The Commission will consider other administrative matters. This Meeting Will Be Open To The Public. Person To Contact For Information: Bryan Whitener, Telephone:

(202)566-3100. Thomas R. Wilkey, Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance Commission. [FR Doc. 08-93 Filed 1-9-08; 12:55 pm]

Connectionstraces to 6

Traces to 6 documents

U.S. Code

CFR