Unknown. Final special conditions
9,809 words·~45 min read·
/register/2008/01/03/07-6265A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
--- schema: federal-register doc_type: fedreg source_file: FR-2008-01-03.xml --- 73 2 Thursday, January 3, 2008 Contents Agriculture Agriculture Department See Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service See Forest Service Animal Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service PROPOSED RULES Animal Welfare: Climatic and Environmental Conditions for Transportation of Warmblooded Animals Other Than Marine Mammals, 413-420 E7-25530 Centers Centers for Disease Control and Prevention NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities;
Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals, 492-493 E7-25564 Centers Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services RULES Payment for Part B medical and other health services: Revisions to payment policies under Physician Fee Schedule and policies for CY 2008; Delay of applicability date of Revised Anti-Markup provisions, etc., 404-406 07-6280 Civil Civil Rights Commission NOTICES Meetings; Sunshine Act, 448-449 07-6310 Commerce Commerce Department See International Trade Administration See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Defense Defense Department NOTICES Arms Sales Notification, 454-478 07-6261 07-6262 07-6263 07-6264 Base Closures and Realignments;
List, 478-479 07-6260 Education Education Department NOTICES Grants and Cooperative Agreements; Availability, Etc.: Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools; Grants to Reduce Alcohol Abuse, 479-482 E7-25587 Employment Employment and Training Administration NOTICES Reports and guidance documents; availability, etc.: Publication of the Five-Year Research, Demonstration, and Evaluation Strategic Plan for 2007-2012, 501-512 E7-25563 Energy Energy Department See Federal Energy Regulatory Commission NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities;
Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals, 482 E7-25567 EPA Environmental Protection Agency NOTICES Meetings: Clean Air Act Advisory Committee, 486 E7-25573 Waste Management System; Testing and Monitoring Activities; Notice of Availability of Final Update IV of SW-846, 486-489 E7-25575 FAA Federal Aviation Administration RULES Airworthiness Directives: Cessna, 395-397 07-6265 DG Flugzeugbau GmbH Model DG-500MB Gliders, 400-402 E7-25212 Pratt & Whitney
(PW)PW4164, PW4168 and PW4168A Turbofan Engines, 394-395 E7-25505 Robinson Helicopter Co. Models R22, R22 Alpha, R22 Beta, R22 Mariner, R44 and R44 and R44 II Helicopters, 397-400 E7-25395 Airworthiness Standards: Special Conditions— Adam Aircraft Industries Model A700; External Fuel Tank Protection During Gear-Up or Emergency Landing, 389-394 E7-25466 NOTICES Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received, 535-537 E7-25526 E7-25527 E7-25528 E7-25532 FCC Federal Communications Commission PROPOSED RULES Commercial Mobile Alert System, 546-607 E7-24876 NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals, 489-491 E7-25512 E7-25513 FDIC Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation PROPOSED RULES Minority and Women Outreach Program Contracting, 420-421 E7-25028 NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals, 491 E7-25576 Federal Election Federal Election Commission NOTICES Meetings; Sunshine Act, 491 07-6283 Federal Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission NOTICES Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation Combined Filings, 482-486 E7-25515 E7-25516 Federal Highway Federal Highway Administration NOTICES Environmental Statements; Notice of Intent: Grays Harbor County, WA, 537-538 E7-25164 Federal Motor Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals, 538 E7-25579 Federal Reserve Federal Reserve System NOTICES Change in Bank Control Notices: Acquisition of Shares of Bank or Bank Holding Companies, 492 E7-25562 Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding Companies, 492 E7-25561 Food Food and Drug Administration RULES Human Drugs: Toll-Free Number for Reporting Adverse Events on Labeling, 402-404 E7-25426 Forest Forest Service NOTICES Environmental Statements; Notice of Intent: Plumas National Forest, CA; Public Wheeled Motorized Travel Management, 444-448 07-6259 Meetings: Pacific Southwest Recreation Resource Advisory Committee, 448 E7-25559 Health Health and Human Services Department See Centers for Disease Control and Prevention See Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services See Food and Drug Administration See National Institutes of Health See Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Homeland Homeland Security Department See Transportation Security Administration Housing Housing and Urban Development Department NOTICES Grants and Cooperative Agreements; Availability, Etc.: Continuum of Care Program (2002, 2003, 2004 FY), 610-769 E7-25427 Interior Interior Department See Land Management Bureau See National Park Service See Reclamation Bureau IRS Internal Revenue Service PROPOSED RULES Diversification Requirements for Certain Defined Contribution Plans, 421-428 E7-25533 NOTICES Meetings: Taxpayer Advocacy Panels, 540-543 E7-25534 E7-25537 E7-25538 E7-25540 E7-25542 E7-25543 E7-25545 E7-25546 E7-25548 E7-25549 E7-25550 E7-25551 E7-25552 E7-25556 E7-25557 International International Trade Administration NOTICES Annual Listing of Foreign Government Subsidies on Articles of Cheese Subject to an In-Quota Rate of Duty; Quarterly Update, 449 E7-25572 Antidumping: Low Enriched Uranium From France, 449-450 07-6279 Labor Labor Department See Employment and Training Administration Land Land Management Bureau NOTICES Coal Exploration License Application, Bowie Resources, LLC; Notice of Invitation, 497 E7-25586 Filing of Plats of Survey: Oregon/Washington, 497-498 E7-25430 Meetings: Boise District Resource Advisory Council, 498 E7-25547 Notice of Realty Action: Non-Competitive (Direct) Sale of Public Land in Mineral County, Nevada, 498-499 E7-25560 Maritime Maritime Administration NOTICES Maintenance and Repair Reimbursement Pilot Program, 538-539 E7-25555 NIH National Institutes of Health NOTICES Meetings: National Toxicology Program; Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods, 493-495 E7-25536 NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration RULES Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic: Gulf of Mexico Vermilion Snapper Fishery Management Measures, 406-411 E7-25584 Fisheries of the Northeastern United States: Atlantic Bluefish Fishery; Quota Transfer, 411-412 07-6289 PROPOSED RULES Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic: Coastal Migratory Pelagic Resources of the Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic; Atlantic Group Spanish Mackerel Commercial Trip Limit in the Southern Zone, 439-441 E7-25583 Fisheries of the Northeastern United States: Northeast Multispecies Fishery, Total Allowable Catches for Eastern Georges Bank Cod, etc., 441-443 E7-25580 NOTICES Atlantic Highly Migratory Species: Pelagic Longline Research, 450-454 07-6290 Marine Mammals; Issuance of Permit Amendment, 454 E7-25582 National Park National Park Service NOTICES National Register of Historic Places; Pending Nominations, 499-500 07-6277 Nuclear Nuclear Regulatory Commission NOTICES Meetings; Sunshine Act, 512 07-6306 Personnel Personnel Management Office PROPOSED RULES Allowances and Differentials: Nonforeign Area Cost-of-Living Allowance Rates; Alaska, 772-773 E7-25302 NOTICES Reports and Guidance Documents; Availability, Etc.: 2006 Nonforeign Area Cost-of-Living Allowance Survey Report; Alaska and Washington, DC, 774-809 E7-25297 Reclamation Reclamation Bureau NOTICES Meetings: Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Work Group, 500-501 E7-25566 SEC Securities and Exchange Commission NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals, 512-513 E7-25523 Investment Company Act of 1940: Notice of Applications for Deregistration, 513-514 E7-25524 Self-Regulatory Organizations; Proposed Rule Changes: American Stock Exchange LLC, 514-524 E7-25487 E7-25569 Boston Stock Exchange, Inc., 524-526 E7-25568 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc., 527-529 E7-25507 E7-25570 Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., 529-533 E7-25508 E7-25571 New York Stock Exchange LLC, 533-534 E7-25506 State State Department NOTICES Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition Determinations: Ancient Greek Objects: The Krimisa Apollo and Bronze Hydria, 534-535 E7-25574 Substance Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration NOTICES Current List of Laboratories Which Meet Minimum Standards To Engage in Urine Drug Testing for Federal Agencies, 495-496 E7-25565 Surface Surface Transportation Board NOTICES CSX Transportation, Inc.—Abandonment Exemption—in Ware County, GA, 539 E7-25486 Transportation Transportation Department See Federal Aviation Administration See Federal Highway Administration See Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration See Maritime Administration See Surface Transportation Board Transportation Transportation Security Administration NOTICES Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC): Enrollment Dates for the Ports of Portland, OR; Victoria, TX; Kahului, Maui, HI; and Kauai, HI., 496-497 E7-25590 Treasury Treasury Department See Internal Revenue Service Veterans Veterans Affairs Department PROPOSED RULES Schedule for Rating Disabilities: Evaluation of Residuals of Traumatic Brain Injury, 432-438 E7-25522 Evaluation of Scars, 428-432 E7-25525 Separate Parts In This Issue Part II Federal Communications Commission, 546-607 E7-24876 Part III Housing and Urban Development Department, 610-769 E7-25427 Part IV Personnel Management Office, 772-809 E7-25297 E7-25302 Reader Aids Consult the Reader Aids section at the end of this issue for phone numbers, online resources, finding aids, reminders, and notice of recently enacted public laws. To subscribe to the Federal Register Table of Contents LISTSERV electronic mailing list, go to http://listserv.access.gpo.gov and select Online mailing list archives, FEDREGTOC-L, Join or leave the list (or change settings); then follow the instructions. 73 2 Thursday, January 3, 2008 Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 23 [Docket No. CE273; Special Conditions 23-213-SC Special Conditions; Adam Aircraft Industries Model A700; External Fuel Tank Protection During Gear-Up or Emergency Landing AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final special conditions. SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for the Adam Aircraft Industries Model A700 airplane. This airplane will have a novel or unusual design feature(s) associated with an External Centerline Fuel Tank
(ECFT)that increases the total capacity of fuel by 184 gallons. The tank is located below the fuselage pressure shell immediately below the wing. The Adam A700 ECFT is a novel, unusual and a potentially unsafe design feature that may pose a hazard to the occupants during a gear-up or emergency landing due to fuel leakage and subsequent fire. Traditional aircraft construction places the fuel tanks in a protected area within the wings and/or fuselage. Fuel tanks located in these areas are well above the fuselage skin and are inherently protected by the wing and fuselage structure. The applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for this design feature. These special conditions contain the additional safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards. DATES: *Effective Date:* December 26, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter L. Rouse, Federal Aviation Administration, Aircraft Certification Service, Small Airplane Directorate, ACE-111, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; 816-329-4135, fax 816-329-4090. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On April 12, 2004, Adam Aircraft Industries applied for a type certificate for their new model A700. The model A700 aircraft is a 6-8 seat pressurized, retractable-gear, carbon composite structure, airplane with two turbofan engines mounted on the aft fuselage. The A700 aircraft is a design evolution of the previously certificated Adam A500, with the aft fuselage mounted turbofan engines replacing the two centerline thrust, turbocharged, reciprocating engines. To maintain a max cruise range similar to the A500 and consistent with other aircraft in the same class as the A700, an external fuel tank located below the fuselage pressure shell and immediately below the wing, has been incorporated in to the A700 design. The A700 and its external fuel tank location are shown in Figure 1: Er03JA08.046 The Adam A700 ECFT is a novel, unusual and a potentially unsafe design feature that may pose a hazard to the occupants during a gear-up or emergency landing due to fuel leakage and subsequent fire. Conventional aircraft construction places the fuel tanks in a protected area within the wings and/or fuselage. Fuel tanks located in these areas are well above the fuselage skin and are inherently protected by the wing and fuselage structure. The A700 ECFT must meet the inherent qualities associated with the protection of the fuel system as provided by 14 CFR part 23. The FAA requires Adam Aircraft to address the following areas with their ECFT design: 1. Load Path: Conventional design approaches establish independent load paths from the keel/skid plate to the airframe major structure where the fuel tanks are isolated from reacting to the gear-up or emergency landing loads. The A700 ECFT design must react to the gear-up or emergency landing loads in a similar manner. 2. Fuel Management: Conventional design approaches use fuel tanks located outside of the wings, or wing centerbox, as auxiliary fuel tanks, and not primary fuel tanks. The fuel in the auxiliary fuel tanks is depleted before the primary fuel tanks, thus the auxiliary tanks are usually empty upon landing. In a similar manner, the A700 ECFT must be an auxiliary fuel tank, and not primary fuel tank. The A700 must deplete the fuel in the ECFT before depleting the fuel in the primary fuel tanks. 3. Location/Geometry: A700 must preclude the scenario where the fuel tank is the first point of contact with the ground in a gear-up or emergency landing. Regulatory Review and Discussion 14 CFR parts 11, 21, 23 and 25 regulations that pertain to the regulatory authority for special conditions, certification of unsafe conditions, structural design criteria, testing and location of the ECFT are §§ 11.19, 21.16, 21.21(b)(2), 23.303, 23.473(d), 23.561, 23.721, 23.967, 23.994 and 25.963. The following rules provide a regulatory framework in which to apply additional requirements, beyond the existing requirements, in order to address novel, unusual and potentially unsafe design features. A special condition is defined in 14 CFR part 11, § 11.19: Section 11.19 A special condition is a regulation that applies to a particular aircraft design. The FAA issues special conditions when we find that the airworthiness regulations for an aircraft, aircraft engine, or propeller design do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards, because of a novel or unusual design feature. A special condition is applied via the criteria defined in 14 CFR part 21, § 21.16: Section 21.16 If the Administrator finds that the airworthiness regulations of this subchapter do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for an aircraft, aircraft engine, or propeller because of a novel or unusual design feature of the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller, he prescribes special conditions and amendments thereto for the product. The special conditions are issued in accordance with part 11 of this chapter and contain such safety standards for the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller as the Administrator finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established in the regulations. An unsafe condition is defined in 14 CFR part 21, § 21.21(b)(2): Section 21.21 An applicant is entitled to a type certificate for an aircraft in the normal, utility, acrobatic, commuter, or transport category, or for a manned free balloon, special class of aircraft, or an aircraft engine or propeller, if—
(b)The applicant submits the type design, test reports, and computations necessary to show that the product to be certificated meets the applicable airworthiness, aircraft noise, fuel venting, and exhaust emission requirements of the Federal Aviation Regulations and any special conditions prescribed by the Administrator, and the Administrator finds—
(2)For an aircraft that no feature or characteristic makes it unsafe for the category in which certification is requested. External fuel tank installations below the wing or fuselage were not envisioned in the development of 14 CFR part 23 fuel tank (and fuel system) regulations. As such, regulations that are not directly applicable to conventional fuel tank installations, but related to the novel, unusual and potentially unsafe design features were reviewed. The following 14 CFR part 23 certification requirements do contain regulatory language that can be used to determine the adequate or appropriate safety standards for novel, unusual and potentially unsafe design features of the Adam A700 ECFT. Section 23.303 Unless otherwise provided, a factor of safety of 1.5 must be used. Section 23.473(d) The selected limit vertical inertia load factor at the center of gravity of the airplane for the ground load conditions prescribed in this subpart may not be less than that which would be obtained when landing with a descent velocity (V), in feet per second, equal to 4.4 (W/S) 1/4 except that this velocity need not be more than 10 feet per second and may not be less than seven feet per second. Section 23.721 For commuter category airplanes that have a passenger seating configuration, excluding pilot seats, of 10 or more, the following general requirements for the landing gear apply:
(a)The main landing-gear system must be designed so that if it fails due to overloads during takeoff and landing (assuming the overloads to act in the upward and aft directions), the failure mode is not likely to cause the spillage of enough fuel from any part of the fuel system to constitute a fire hazard.
(b)Each airplane must be designed so that, with the airplane under control, it can be landed on a paved runway with any one or more landing-gear legs not extended without sustaining a structural component failure that is likely to cause the spillage of enough fuel to constitute a fire hazard.
(c)Compliance with the provisions of this section may be shown by analysis or tests, or both. 14 CFR part 23, §§ 23.303 and 23.473(d) relate to the associated margin of safety required above the limit loading condition and the required limit ground loading conditions. 14 CFR part 23, § 23.721 is applicable to commuter category airplanes; however, the intent is to ensure that the failure of the landing gear does not cause the spillage of enough fuel from any part of the fuel system to constitute a fire hazard. The location of the ECFT, in direct line behind the nose landing gear, makes it particularly vulnerable to failures of the nose landing gear. 14 CFR part 23 contains a limited scope of regulatory requirements pertaining to fuel tank (and fuel system) protection during a gear-up or emergency landing. These current regulations pertaining to the fuel tank (and fuel system) state: Section 23.561(b) The structure must be designed to [give each occupant every reasonable chance of escaping serious injury when—
(1)Proper use is made of seats, safety belts, and shoulder harnesses provided for in the design;
(2)The occupant experiences the static inertia loads corresponding to the following ultimate load factors—
(i)Upward, 3.0g for normal, utility, and commuter category airplanes, or 4.5g for acrobatic category airplanes;
(ii)Forward, 9.0g;
(iii)Sideward, 1.5g; and
(iv)Downward, 6.0g when certification to the emergency exit provisions of Sec. 23.807(d)(4) is requested; and
(3)The items of mass within the cabin, that could injure an occupant, experience the static inertia loads corresponding to the following ultimate load factors—
(i)Upward, 3.0g;
(ii)Forward, 18.0g; and
(iii)Sideward, 4.5g. Section 23.561(c) Each airplane with retractable landing gear must be designed to protect each occupant in a landing—
(1)With the wheels retracted;
(2)With moderate descent velocity; and
(3)Assuming, in the absence of a more rational analysis—
(i)A downward ultimate inertia force of 3g; and
(ii)A coefficient of friction of 0.5 at the ground. Section 23.967(a) Each fuel tank must be able to withstand, without failure, the vibration, inertia, fluid, and structural loads that it may be subjected to in operation. Section 23.967(e) Fuel tanks must be designed, located, and installed so as to retain fuel:
(1)When subjected to the inertia loads resulting from the ultimate static load factors prescribed in § 23.561(b)(2) of this part; and
(2)Under conditions likely to occur when the airplane lands on a paved runway at a normal landing speed under each of the following conditions:
(i)The airplane in a normal attitude and its landing gear retracted.
(ii)The most critical landing gear leg collapsed and the other landing gear legs extended. Section 23.994 Fuel system components in an engine nacelle or in the fuselage must be protected from damage which could result in spillage of enough fuel to constitute a fire hazard as a result of a wheels-up landing on a paved runway. The regulatory requirements of § 23.967(e)(1) refer to § 23.561(b)(2), which is an occupant protection rule. The requirements of § 23.561(b)(2) do not have a downward component for non-commuter category airplanes. To comply with the requirements of § 23.967(e)(2), the moderate descent velocity identified in § 23.561(c)(2), which is also an occupant protection rule, has been used as an acceptable means of compliance for traditional fuel tank designs that do not have novel, unusual and potentially unsafe design features. These regulations have historically demonstrated an acceptable level of safety for traditional fuel tank designs that do not have novel, unusual and potentially unsafe design features. Existing aircraft designs with this satisfactory service history have the fuel tanks located well above the fuselage skin and are inherently protected by the wing and the fuselage structure, thus providing a “crush zone.” The intent of 14 CFR part 23, § 23.994 is to minimize the hazard to the airplane due to fuel system components that are affected (those which are traditionally located in the fuselage or engine nacelle) when the underside of the airplane contacts the ground in a wheels-up landing. The intent is applicable to those components below the fuselage. 14 CFR part 23 guidance materials recognize that there may be situations when the installation of an auxiliary fuel tanks will require special conditions because of a novel, unusual and potentially unsafe design feature. Advisory Circular
(AC)23-10, Auxiliary Fuel Systems for Reciprocating and Turbine Powered Part 23 Airplanes, states in paragraph 5: 5. Certification Basis a. New Type Certificates. For the issuance of a new type certificate, an airplane must be shown to comply with the certification basis established in accordance with § 21.17 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR). If the regulations do not provide adequate or appropriate standards because of a novel or unusual design feature, special conditions will be prescribed in accordance with § 21.16. c. Unsafe Features or Characteristics. Notwithstanding compliance with the established certification basis, § 21.21 precludes approval if there is any feature or characteristic that makes the airplane unsafe. The applicant should recognize that it may be necessary, because of such a feature or characteristic, to impose special requirements which exceed the standards of the certification basis, to eliminate the unsafe condition. Since 14 CFR part 23 airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for the external fuel tank design, a review of the safety standards contained in 14 CFR part 25 was conducted to evaluate their applicability to the novel, unusual and potentially unsafe design feature of the ECFT. 14 CFR part 25, § 25.963 has regulatory requirements that ensure that fuel tanks within the fuselage contour are in a protected position. Section 25.963(d) Fuel tanks within the fuselage contour must be able to resist rupture, and to retain fuel, under the inertia forces prescribed for the emergency landing conditions in Sec. 25.561. In addition, these tanks must be in a protected position so that exposure of the tanks to scraping action with the ground is unlikely. Section 25.963(e)(1) Fuel tank access covers must comply with the following criteria in order to avoid loss of hazardous quantities of fuel:
(1)All covers located in an area where experience or analysis indicates a strike is likely must be shown by analysis or tests to minimize penetration and deformation by tire fragments, low energy engine debris, or other likely debris. 14 CFR part 25, § 25.963(d) is applicable to transport category airplanes; however, the intent is to ensure that in the event of an emergency landing, the fuel tank is in a protected position so that exposure of the tank to scraping action with the ground is unlikely. The location of the ECFT, located below the fuselage, makes it particularly vulnerable to scraping action with the ground in the event of a gear-up landing. 14 CFR part 25, § 25.963(e) is applicable to transport category airplanes, and only applies to the access panels; however, the intent is to prevent a hazard as a result of the impact by tire fragments or debris. This philosophy would be applied to the ECFT (not just access panels) to prevent hazardous leakage of fuel in the event of impact from tire fragments or other likely debris. 14 CFR part 25 guidance materials also recognize the need to protect the auxiliary fuel tanks beyond the velocities used as an acceptable means of compliance. The first chapter of AC 25-8, Auxiliary Fuel Systems Installations, is titled “Fuel System Installation Integrity and Crashworthiness” and the first paragraph states the following: “Survivable accidents have occurred at vertical descent velocities greater than the 5 feet per second (f.p.s.) referenced in § 25.561. The energy from such descents is absorbed by the structure along the lower fuselage. As the limits of survivable accidents are approached, structure under the main cabin floor is crushed and deformed and the volume below the floor, where the auxiliary fuel tanks are frequently located, may be reduced and reshaped. For this reason the tank material chosen by the applicant should provide resilience and flexibility; or, in the absence of these characteristics, the tank installation should provide extra clearance from structure that can be crushed or be protected by primary structure not likely to be crushed.” Due to the concern of the Adam A700 ECFT to potentially contact the ground in a gear-up or emergency landing, we contacted the FAA Office of Accident Investigation, Safety Analysis Branch to determine the number of incidents/accidents where an aircraft landed with the landing gear retracted or the landing gear collapsed on the ground. The search used was conducted over a 25 year period from January 1982 thru January 2007, and queried all N-registered aircraft that were not 14 CFR parts 121, 135, or 129 and that had at least one of the following occurrence codes: Gear Collapsed Main Gear Collapsed Nose Gear Collapsed Tail Gear Collapsed Complete Gear Collapsed Other Gear Collapsed Gear Not Extended Gear Not Retracted Gear Retraction On Ground During the queried timeframe, there were 740 reported incidents/accidents, which yields an average of 30 reported incidents/accidents per year. There were no injuries or fatalities associated with the 740 reported incidents/accidents. All of the reported incidents/accidents involved aircraft having fuel in the center section of the wing area confined by the front and rear spars and the side of body wing ribs. The data shows a high probability for a landing gear failure, malfunction or not being extended during landing and that there is a good safety record for configurations involved in these incidents/accidents. The certification standards for the Adam A700 ECFT need to consider the placement of the ECFT outside of the protective wing area confined by the front and rear spars and the side of body wing ribs configurations, and the high probability of the ECFT contacting the ground. Because of the Adam A700 ECFT's novel, unusual and potentially unsafe design features, it is necessary to impose a specific vertical velocity requirement that exceed the 5 feet per second requirement normally imposed on conventional airplane fuel tank designs. Conventionally installed fuel tanks, located within the fuselage and wing primary structure, have used § 23.561(c)(2) as an acceptable means of compliance to the requirements of § 23.967(e)(2). Fuel tank installations are not bound by regulatory requirements to use § 23.561(c)(2) as an acceptable means of compliance to the requirements of § 23.967(e)(2). The standards contained in § 23.561(c)(2), which is an occupant protection rule, provided adequate or appropriate standards for conventionally installed fuel tanks. Initially, the FAA proposed to use the vertical velocity requirements (26.8 feet per second) contained in § 23.562 as a means of compliance to the requirements of § 23.967(e)(2), as this rule is also an occupant protection rule. The velocities cited in the two occupant protection rules range from 5 feet per second to 26.8 feet per second. The velocity cited in § 23.561(c)(2) is the velocity for a minor crash landing, where the velocity in § 23.562 is the upper limit of a survivable crash landing. The requirements contained in § 23.967(e)(2) allow for the conditions likely to occur, and the range of velocities likely to occur during a survivable crash landing (5 feet per second—26.8 feet per second). Given that there is a range of velocities that define a survivable crash landing, there is ample regulatory room in which to determine an acceptable means of compliance. The FAA proposal to use the vertical velocity requirements contained in § 23.562 as a means of compliance to the requirements of § 23.967(e)(2) for the initially proposed ECFT design, was withdrawn by the FAA due to Adam Aircraft proposing to redesign the ECFT. As such, the FAA researched the standards within 14 CFR part 23 to determine a vertical velocity within the range of velocities likely to occur that provide adequate or appropriate standards, mitigate potential unsafe conditions, and do not exceed the intent of the rule. The normal precision approach speed for the Adam A700 will be approximately 120 KIAS. This approach speed will result in a normal vertical descent velocity of 10.6 feet per second. The normal precision approach speed is a speed that falls within the speeds that are likely to occur when the airplane lands on a paved runway at a normal landing speed. 14 CFR part 23, § 23.473(d) requires that the aircraft be able to absorb a limit load imposed by a vertical descent velocity of 10 feet per second for landing conditions. Combining the velocity requirements of § 23.473(d) and a commensurate 1.5 factor of safety, as required by § 23.303, would result in a vertical descent velocity of 12.25 feet per second. The derivation used to determine the ultimate velocity based upon the § 23.473(d) limit vertical inertia load and the factor of safety defined in § 23.303 is shown below: The relationship between velocity, acceleration and distance is shown by the equation: V <sup>2</sup> 2 = V <sup>1</sup> 2 + 2 a d The relationship between force and acceleration is shown by the equation: F = ma The relationship between limit force
(load)and ultimate force
(load)is shown by the equation: F <sup>Ultimate</sup> = F <sup>Limit</sup> C <sup>FactorofSafety</sup> Assuming a constant mass of the object, an ending velocity of zero and grouping the terms: ER03JA08.044 Thus, the relationship between limit velocity and ultimate velocity is shown by the equation: ER03JA08.045 Conventional airplanes with fuel tanks located below the fuselage are designed such that the ground impact loads are not absorbed by the tanks. Fuel tanks in these locations are especially vulnerable to these ground impact loads if design precautions/mitigations are not taken. If the ECFT is designed such that it absorbs gear-up landing loads, a gear-up landing could damage the ECFT and result in the spillage of enough fuel to constitute a fire hazard. The location of the A700 ECFT must be evaluated for ground impact in a gear-up landing, and design precautions/mitigations must be taken such that load paths do not go through the fuel tanks. The location of the A700 ECFT must be evaluated for exposure of the tank to impact from runway debris or from fragments emanating from failures of the tires. The location of the ECFT, below and in direct line behind the nose landing gear, makes it particularly vulnerable to debris from failures of the nose landing gear tires. The A700 ECFT, compared to other designs that have fuel tanks located outside of the wings, was the only design that contained a significant percentage of the total fuel quantity of fuel below the fuselage. Existing designs, that have fuel tanks located outside of the wings, have their relatively smaller percentage of the total fuel quantity in their lower fuselage tanks and it is transferred out to the primary fuel tanks, so they are emptied early in the flight. The existing designs, that have fuel tanks located outside of the wings, use the fuel tanks below the fuselage as auxiliary fuel tanks, and they do not feed the engines directly, but rather are used to replenish the primary fuel tanks. The A700 ECFT design indicates the ECFT is an auxiliary fuel tank, does not feed the engines directly, but rather is used to replenish the primary fuel tanks. If the ECFT design is an auxiliary fuel tank, and it does not feed the engines directly, but rather is used to replenish the primary fuel tanks, it would provide mitigation by using the fuel quantity located in the ECFT, thus the ECFT is emptied early in the flight. Based on our current understanding of the A700 ECTF design, the FAA agrees that Adam Aircraft may have provided the following mitigating design features: 1. The keel and truss assembly that make up the protective structure in current A700 ECFT design configuration affords the equivalent level of protection as currently certificated aircraft with fuel tanks located in the wings, or wing centerbox. The keel and truss assembly provide a structurally independent load path that does not transmit the ground impact forces through the ECFT during a gear-up or emergency landing, and also protects the ECFT from ground contact by providing protective structure. 2. The ECFT is an auxiliary fuel tank, and it does not feed the engines directly, but rather is used to replenish the primary fuel tanks. The fuel in the ECFT will be used before the fuel in the wing tanks. The mitigating features offered by Adam Aircraft: independent load path, fuel management, and location/geometry, coupled with dynamic drop testing and a subsequent rational structural analysis using static test results and the dynamic drop test results, provide the FAA with sufficient justification to reduce the descent velocity from 12.25 feet per second to no less then 5 feet per second. Type Certification Basis Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.17, Adam Aircraft Industries must show that the model A700 meets the applicable provisions of 14 CFR part 23, as amended by Amendments 23-1 through 23-55 thereto. If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 23) do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for the model A700 because of a novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed under the provisions of § 21.16. In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special conditions, the Model model A700 must comply with the fuel vent and exhaust emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and the noise certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36, and the FAA must issue a finding of regulatory adequacy pursuant to § 611 of Public Law 92-574, the “Noise Control Act of 1972”. Special conditions, as appropriate, as defined in § 11.19, are issued in accordance with § 11.38, and become part of the type certification basis in accordance with § 21.17(a)(2). Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended later to include any other model that incorporates the same novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would also apply to the other model under the provisions of § 21.101(a)(1). Novel or Unusual Design Features The model A700 will incorporate the following novel or unusual design features: External Centerline Fuel Tank
(ECFT)Discussion of Comments Notice of proposed special conditions No. 23-07-03-SC for the Adam Aircraft Industries Model A700 airplanes was published in the **Federal Register** on Tuesday, September 18, 2007, Vol. 72, No. 180. No comments were received, and the special conditions are adopted as proposed. Applicability As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the Adam Aircraft Industries Model A700. Should Adam Aircraft Industries apply at a later date for a change to the type certificate to include another model incorporating the same novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would apply to that model as well under the provisions of § 21.101(a)(1). [For Final Special Conditions Effective Upon Issuance] Under standard practice, the effective date of final special conditions would be 30 days after the date of publication in the **Federal Register** ; however, as the certification date for the Adam Aircraft Industries Model A700 is imminent, the FAA finds that good cause exists to make these special conditions effective upon issuance. Conclusion This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features on one model of airplanes. It is not a rule of general applicability, and it affects only the applicant who applied to the FAA for approval of these features on the airplane. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 23 Aircraft, Aviation safety, Signs and symbols. Citation The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113 and 44701; 14 CFR 21.16 and 21.17; and 14 CFR 11.38 and 11.19. The Special Conditions Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of the type certification basis for Adam Aircraft Industries Model A700 airplanes. 1. SC 23.561(c): Each airplane with retractable landing gear and external fuel tank system(s) located beneath the fuselage must be designed to protect each occupant in a landing— 1. With the wheels retracted; 2. With descent velocity of 12.25 feet per second UNLESS mitigating design features are incorporated that address: i. Independent load path ii. Fuel management iii. Location/Geometry iv. Other safety enhancing design features as proposed by the applicant. If adequate mitigation is demonstrated for all the above design features, the FAA will reduce the descent velocity to no less then 5 feet per second; and 3. By defining, based on a rational analysis, supported by tests: i. A downward ultimate inertia force; and ii. A coefficient of friction of 0.5, or a rational analysis for a coefficient of friction, at the ground. Compliance with SC 23.561(c)(2) will be demonstrated by dynamic drop test. 2. SC 23.721: The following general requirements for the landing gear apply: 1. The landing-gear system must be designed so that if it fails due to overloads during takeoff and landing (assuming the overloads to act in the upward and aft directions), the failure mode is not likely to cause the spillage of enough fuel from any part of the external fuel tank system(s) located beneath the fuselage to constitute a fire hazard. 2. The airplane must be designed so that, with the airplane under control, it can be landed on a paved runway with any one or more landing-gear legs not extended without sustaining a structural component failure that is likely to cause the spillage of enough fuel to constitute a fire hazard. 3. Compliance with the provisions of this section may be shown by analysis or tests, or both. 3. SC 23.994: Fuel system components in external fuel tank system(s) located beneath the fuselage must be protected from damage which could result in spillage of enough fuel to constitute a fire hazard as a result of a wheels-up landing on a paved runway. 4. SC 23.XXX: Fuel tanks within and below the fuselage contour must be installed in accordance with the requirements prescribed in Sec. 23.967. External fuel tank system(s) located beneath the fuselage must have the following design mitigations: 1. The external fuel tank system(s) must be in a protected position so that exposure of the tank to scraping action, or impact, with the ground is unlikely during a gear-up landing of the most critical landing gear or landing gears, when landing on a paved runway. 2. The external fuel tank system(s) must be protected by dedicated protective structure, and the protective structure load paths must be independent of the fuel system during a gear-up landing of the most critical landing gear or landing gears, when landing on a paved runway. 3. The hazard to the external fuel tank system(s) that results from impact by landing gear tire fragments or other likely debris must be minimized. 4. The fuel management of the external fuel tank system(s) must be such that fuel in the external fuel tank system(s) is to be emptied prior to fuel in the main tanks. Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on December 26, 2007. John Colomy, Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. E7-25466 Filed 1-2-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-13-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-2007-27230; Directorate Identifier 2007-NE-04-AD] Amendment 39-15322; AD 2007-26-20] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Pratt & Whitney
(PW)PW4164, PW4168, and PW4168A Turbofan Engines AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive
(AD)for PW PW4164, PW4168, and PW4168A turbofan engines with certain low pressure turbine
(LPT)stage 4 disks, part number (P/N) 51N404, installed. This AD requires removing certain LPT stage 4 disks, listed by serial number at the next piece-part exposure or within 7,500 cycles-since-new (CSN). This AD results from a report of improperly manufactured LPT stage 4 disks. We are issuing this AD to prevent an uncontained engine failure due to low-cycle fatigue (LCF), which could result in damage to the airplane. DATES: This AD becomes effective February 7, 2008. ADDRESSES: The Docket Operations office is located at Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: V. Rose Len, Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; telephone
(781)238-7772; fax
(781)238-7199. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA proposed to amend 14 CFR part 39 with a proposed AD. The proposed AD applies to PW PW4164, PW4168, and PW4168A. We published the proposed AD in the **Federal Register** on May 21, 2007 (72 FR 28459). That action proposed to require removing certain LPT stage 4 disks, P/N 51N404, listed by serial number in the proposed AD, at the next piece-part exposure, or within 7,500 CSN, whichever occurs first. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at *http://www.regulations.gov;* or in person at the Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Operations office (telephone
(800)647-5527) is provided in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt. Comments We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the development of this AD. We have considered the comment received. Pratt & Whitney proposes that we not write an AD. Pratt & Whitney states that they performed additional testing for low-cycle fatigue (LCF). They state the testing shows the disks with the 1-hour heat treatment are equivalent to the disks treated with a 4-hour heat treatment. We do not agree. The data that PW presents to us doesn't conclusively show the 1-hour heat-treat LCF capability is equivalent to the 4-hour heat-treat disks. We didn't change the AD. Conclusion We have carefully reviewed the available data, including the comment received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed. Costs of Compliance We estimate that this AD will affect 11 engines installed on airplanes of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it will take about 250 work-hours per engine to perform the required action, if not done at piece-part exposure, and that the average labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Required parts will cost about $186,288 per engine. Based on these figures, we estimate the total cost of the AD to U.S. operators to be $2,269,168. Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, “General requirements.” Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. Regulatory Findings We have determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1)Is not a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866;
(2)Is not a “significant rule” under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3)Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. We prepared a summary of the costs to comply with this AD and placed it in the AD Docket. You may get a copy of this summary at the address listed under ADDRESSES . List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety. Adoption of the Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. § 39.13 [Amended] 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive: **2007-26-20 Pratt & Whitney:** Amendment 39-15322. Docket No. FAA-2007-27230; Directorate Identifier 2007-NE-04-AD. Effective Date
(a)This airworthiness directive
(AD)becomes effective February 7, 2008. Affected ADs
(b)None. Applicability
(c)This AD applies to Pratt & Whitney PW4164, PW4168, and PW4168A turbofan engines with certain low pressure turbine
(LPT)stage 4 disks, part number (P/N) 51N404, that have a serial number (S/N) listed in the following Table 1, installed. These engines are installed on, but not limited to, Airbus A330-200 and A330-300 series airplanes. Table 1.—Affected LPT Stage 4 Disks by Serial Number LPT Stage 4 Disk Serial Nos. CLDLC01142 CLDLC01143 CLDLC01144 CLDLC01145 CLDLC01146 CLDLC01148 CLDLC01149 CLDLC01150 CLDLC01151 CLDLC01152 CLDLC01181 CLDLC01182 CLDLC01183 CLDLC01185 CLDLC01186 CLDLC01187 Unsafe Condition
(d)This AD results from a report of improperly manufactured LPT stage 4 disks. We are issuing this AD to prevent an uncontained engine failure due to low-cycle fatigue, which could result in damage to the airplane. Compliance
(e)You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD performed at the next piece-part exposure after the effective date of this AD or within 7,500 cycles-since-new, unless the actions have already been done. Removing the LPT Stage 4 Disk
(f)Remove from service any LPT stage 4 disk that has an S/N listed in Table 1 of this AD. Prohibition Against Installing an Affected Disk
(g)After the effective date of this AD, do not install any disk, P/N 51N404, that has an S/N listed in Table 1 of this AD or any disk removed as specified in paragraph
(f)of this AD except as allowed by paragraph
(h)of this AD. Alternative Methods of Compliance
(h)The Manager, Engine Certification Office, has the authority to approve alternative methods of compliance for this AD if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Special Flight Permits
(i)Under 14 CFR part 39.23, we are prohibiting the special flight permits for this AD. Related Information
(j)Contact V. Rose Len, Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; telephone
(781)238-7772; fax
(781)238-7199, for more information about this AD. Material Incorporated by Reference
(k)None. Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on December 20, 2007. Peter A. White, Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. E7-25505 Filed 1-2-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-13-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-2007-0379; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-331-AD; Amendment 39-15318; AD 2007-26-16] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Cessna Model 680 Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule; request for comments. SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive
(AD)for certain Cessna Model 680 airplanes. This AD requires inspecting the routing of the aft fairing wire bundle assembly for adequate separation between the wiring and the hydraulic line; inspecting for chafing or damage of the wire bundle assembly and for damage to the hydraulic line, and doing corrective actions if necessary. This AD results from an incident report which indicated that a hydraulic leak and wire chafing, including signs of heat damage, were found within the lower tail cone fairing area. Similar wire chafing has also been found on other airplanes. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct wire chafing, and inadequate separation of the wiring and hydraulic line, which could lead to electrical arcing and a hydraulic leak and could result in a potential source of ignition and consequent fire. DATES: This AD is effective January 18, 2008. The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of February 7, 2008. We must receive comments on this AD by March 3, 2008. ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods: • *Federal eRulemaking Portal:* Go to *http://www.regulations.gov.* Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • *Fax:* 202-493-2251. • *Mail:* U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. • *Hand Delivery:* U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. For service information identified in this AD, contact Cessna Aircraft Co., P.O. Box 7706, Wichita, Kansas 67277. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at *http://www.regulations.gov* ; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jarrett Larrow, Aerospace Engineer, Electrical Systems and Avionics, ACE-119W, FAA, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone
(316)946-4128; fax
(316)946-4107. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Discussion We received an incident report which indicated that a hydraulic leak and wire chafing, including signs of heat damage, were found within the lower tail cone fairing area on a Cessna Model 680 airplane. The incident occurred while the airplane was on the ground. Wire chafing has also been found on other airplanes. Chafing of the wiring, and inadequate separation of the wiring and hydraulic line, could lead to electrical arcing and a hydraulic leak and could result in a potential source of ignition and consequent fire. Relevant Service Information We reviewed Cessna Alert Service Letter ASL680-24-02, dated October 1, 2007. The service letter describes procedures for inspecting the routing of the aft fairing wire bundle assembly for adequate separation between the wiring and the hydraulic line; inspecting for chafing or damage of the wire bundle assembly and for damage to the hydraulic line; and corrective actions if necessary. The corrective actions include repairing the wiring if any damage to the wire bundle is found, replacing the hydraulic line if any damage is found, and re-routing the wire bundle so there is a minimum of two inches from the hydraulic line. The service letter refers to the Model 680 wiring diagram and maintenance manuals, which contain the procedures for doing the corrective actions. FAA's Determination and Requirements of This AD We are issuing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design. This AD requires accomplishing the actions specified in the service information described previously, except as discussed under “Differences Between the AD and the Service Information.” Differences Between the AD and the Service Information The service information refers only to an “inspection” for routing and chafing or damage of the wire bundles and hydraulic line. We have determined that the procedures in the service information should be described as a “general visual inspection.” Note 1 has been included in this AD to define this type of inspection. The Accomplishment Instructions of the service information describe procedures for completing a maintenance transaction report and submitting a copy to the manufacturer. This AD would not require that action. Interim Action We consider this AD interim action. If final action is later identified, we might consider further rulemaking then. FAA's Determination of the Effective Date An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of this AD; therefore, providing notice and opportunity for public comment before the AD is issued is impracticable, and good cause exists to make this AD effective in less than 30 days. Comments Invited This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight safety, and we did not provide you with notice and an opportunity to provide your comments before it becomes effective. However, we invite you to send any written data, views, or arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include “Docket No. FAA-2007-0379; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-331-AD” at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this AD because of those comments. We will post all comments we receive, without change, to *http://www.regulations.gov* , including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive about this AD. Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. “Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,” describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in “Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.” Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. Regulatory Findings This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1)Is not a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866,
(2)Is not a “significant rule” under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
(3)Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of compliance in the AD Docket. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. Adoption of the Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. § 39.13 [Amended] 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new AD: **2007-26-16 Cessna Aircraft Company:** Amendment 39-15318. Docket No. FAA-2007-0379; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-331-AD. Effective Date
(a)This airworthiness directive
(AD)is effective January 18, 2008. Affected ADs
(b)None. Applicability
(c)This AD applies to Cessna Model 680 airplanes, certificated in any category, serial numbers -0001 through -0152 inclusive, -0157, and -0158. Unsafe Condition
(d)This AD results from an incident report which indicated that a hydraulic leak and wire chafing, including signs of heat damage, were found within the lower tail cone fairing area. Similar wire chafing has also been found on other airplanes. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct wire chafing, and inadequate separation of the wiring and hydraulic line, which could lead to electrical arcing and a hydraulic leak and could result in a potential source of ignition and consequent fire. Compliance
(e)Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done. Inspections/Corrective Actions
(f)Within 10 days after the effective date of this AD: Do a general visual inspection of the routing of the aft fairing wire bundle assembly for adequate separation between the wiring and the hydraulic line, and do a general visual inspection for chafing or damage of the wire bundle assembly and for damage to the hydraulic line; by doing all of the actions, including all applicable corrective actions, specified in the Accomplishment Instructions of Cessna Alert Service Letter ASL680-24-02, dated October 1, 2007; except as provided by paragraph
(g)of this AD. Do all applicable corrective actions before further flight. Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a general visual inspection is: “A visual examination of an interior or exterior area, installation, or assembly to detect obvious damage, failure, or irregularity. This level of inspection is made from within touching distance unless otherwise specified. A mirror may be necessary to ensure visual access to all surfaces in the inspection area. This level of inspection is made under normally available lighting conditions such as daylight, hangar lighting, flashlight, or droplight and may require removal or opening of access panels or doors. Stands, ladders, or platforms may be required to gain proximity to the area being checked.” Exception to Alert Service Letter
(g)Although the Accomplishment Instructions of Cessna Alert Service Letter ASL680-24-02, dated October 1, 2007, specify to submit certain information to the manufacturer, this AD does not include that requirement. Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) (h)(1) The Manager, Electrical Systems and Avionics, ACE-119W, FAA, ATTN: Jarrett Larrow, Aerospace Engineer, Electrical Systems and Avionics, ACE-119W, FAA, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, 1801 Airport Road, room 100, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone
(316)946-4128; fax
(316)946-4107; has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2)To request a different method of compliance or a different compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI)in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO. Material Incorporated by Reference
(i)You must use Cessna Alert Service Letter ASL680-24-02, dated October 1, 2007, to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1)The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of this service information under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2)For service information identified in this AD, contact Cessna Aircraft Co., P.O. Box 7706, Wichita, Kansas 67277.
(3)You may review copies of the service information incorporated by reference at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington; or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.* Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 20, 2007. Ali Bahrami, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 07-6265 Filed 1-2-08; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 9
Traces to 9 documents
CFR
- Designation of applicable regulations.§ 21.17
- Special conditions.§ 21.16
- What public comment procedures does the FAA follow for Special Conditions?§ 11.38
- May I address the unsafe condition in a way other than that set out in the airworthiness directive?§ 39.19
- May I fly my aircraft to a repair facility to do the work required by an airworthiness directive?§ 39.23
U.S. Code
9 references not yet in our index
- 14 CFR 23
- 14 CFR 11
- 14 CFR 21
- 14 CFR 25
- 14 CFR 34
- 14 CFR 36
- Pub. L. 92-574
- 14 CFR 39
- 1 CFR 51
Citation graph
cites case law
Unknown
Final special conditions
Cite14 CFR 23
Cite14 CFR 11
Cite14 CFR 21
Cites 18 · showing 12Cited by 0 across 0 sources