Notices. Notice

8,819 words·~40 min read·/register/2007/11/30/07-5889

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health Prospective Grant of Exclusive License: Development of FDA Approved HIV Resistance Diagnosis Kit AGENCY: National Institutes of Health, Public Health Service, HHS. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: This is notice, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 209(c)(1) and 37 CFR 404.7(a)(1)(i), that the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Health and Human Services, is contemplating the grant of an exclusive license to practice the invention embodied in U.S.

Patent No. 5,714,313, issued February 03, 1998, entitled “Simple Method For Detecting Inhibitors Of Retroviral Replication” (HHS Ref. E-054-1991/1-US-01) ( *Inventors:* David Garfinkel, Joan Curcio, Dwight Nissley and Jeffrey Strathern) (NCI), to AmiKana.BioLogics (Hereafter AmiKana), having a place of business in France. The patent rights in these inventions have been assigned to the United States of America. DATES: Only written comments and/or application for a license, which are received by the NIH Office of Technology Transfer on or before January 29, 2008 will be considered.

ADDRESSES: Requests for a copy of the patent application, inquiries, comments and other materials relating to the contemplated license should be directed to: Sally Hu, Ph.D., M.B.A., Office of Technology Transfer, National Institutes of Health, 6011 Executive Boulevard, Suite 325, Rockville, MD 20852-3804; E-mail: *hus@od.nih.gov* ; Telephone:

(301)435-5606; Facsimile:

(301)402-0220. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The subject technology discloses a DNA vector comprised of a selectable marker gene inserted into a retrotransposon for use in identifying and selecting cells in which retrotransposition has occurred. This novel method uses a retrotransposon comprised of a retroviral reverse transcriptase/RNAse H gene domain, which creates a unique restriction enzyme site wherever reverse transcription occurs. This novel system offers a means of identifying compounds or agents that can inhibit retrotransposition or retroviral replication. Previous methods developed to detect retrotransposition have not been able to accurately identify DNA in which reverse transcription has occurred. Certain types of retrotransposition are similar to retroviral replication. Thus, this method is applicable to identifying antiretroviral compounds as well as inhibitors of retrotransposition. The field of use may be limited to the development of FDA approved HIV resistance diagnosis kit through the combination of the subject technology and AmiKana's proprietary yeast based HIV protease phenotyping procedure (Patent Publication No. WO2006000693). The prospective exclusive license will be royalty bearing and will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be granted unless, within 60 days from the date of this published Notice, NIH receives written evidence and argument that establishes that the grant of the license would not be consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. Properly filed competing applications for a license filed in response to this notice will be treated as objections to the contemplated license. Comments and objections submitted in response to this notice will not be made available for public inspection, and, to the extent permitted by law, will not be released under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552. Dated: November 19, 2007. Steven M. Ferguson, Director, Division of Technology Development and Transfer, Office of Technology Transfer, National Institutes of Health. [FR Doc. E7-23191 Filed 11-29-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4140-01-P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Federal Emergency Management Agency [Docket No. FEMA-2007-0013] National Advisory Council AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. ACTION: Notice of teleconference meeting. SUMMARY: The National Advisory Council

(NAC)will be holding a teleconference meeting for purposes of discussing governance and standard operating procedures. The teleconference meeting will be open to the public. DATES: *Meeting Date:* Tuesday, December 18, 2007, 1 p.m.-2 p.m. e.s.t. *Comment Date:* Written comments must be received by December 14, 2007. ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held via teleconference only. Members of the public who wish to obtain the call-in number, access code, and other information for the public teleconference may contact Alyson Price as listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section by December 14, 2007. All written comments must be received by December 14, 2007. All submissions received must include the docket number FEMA-2007-0013 and may be submitted by any one of the following methods: *Federal eRulemaking Portal:* *http://www.regulations.gov* . Follow instructions for submitting comments on the Web site. *E-mail:* *FEMA-RULES@dhs.gov* . Include docket number in the subject line of the message. *Facsimile:*

(866)466-5370. *Mail:* Alyson Price, Designated Federal Officer, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., (E Street, 3rd Floor), Washington, DC 20472. *Hand Delivery/Courier:* National Advisory Council, DFO c/o Rules Docket Clerk, Office of the Chief Counsel, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Room 835, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472. *Instructions:* All submissions received must include the docket number: FEMA-2007-0013. Comments received will also be posted without alteration at *http://www.regulations.gov* , including any personal information provided. You may want to read the Privacy Act Notice located on the Privacy and Use Notice link on the Administration Navigation Bar of the Web site *http://www.regulations.gov* . *Docket:* For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received by the National Advisory Council, go to *http://www.regulations.gov* . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alyson Price, Designated Federal Officer, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., (E Street, 3rd Floor), Washington, DC 20472, telephone 202-646-3746, fax 202-646-3061, and e-mail *Alyson.Price@dhs.gov* . The NAC's Web site can be located at: *http://www.fema.gov/about/nac/* . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. 1 *et seq.* ). The NAC will be holding a teleconference meeting for purposes of discussing governance and standard operating procedures. This meeting is open to the public. Although members of the public will not be allowed to comment orally during the meeting, they may file a written statement with the NAC before the date of the meeting. The NAC's Web site can be located at: *http://www.fema.gov/about/nac/* . Agenda of Council Meeting, December 18, 2007 The tentative agenda will include discussions on governance and standard operating procedures for the NAC. A final agenda will be available on the NAC Web site at *http://www.fema.gov/about/nac/* . Dated: November 26, 2007. R. David Paulison, Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency. [FR Doc. E7-23216 Filed 11-29-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110-21-P DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT [Docket No. FR-5125-N-48] Federal Property Suitable as Facilities to Assist the Homeless AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless. DATES: *Effective Date:* November 30, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20410; telephone

(202)708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired

(202)708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-7588. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in *National Coalition for the Homeless* v. *Veterans Administration* , No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week. Dated: November 21, 2007. Mark R. Johnston, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs. [FR Doc. E7-23082 Filed 11-28-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4210-67-P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Office of the Secretary, National Invasive Species Council; Request for Nominations for the Invasive Species Advisory Committee SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the Interior, on behalf of the interdepartmental National Invasive Species Council, proposes to appoint new members to the Invasive Species Advisory Committee (ISAC). The Secretary of the Interior, acting as administrative lead, is requesting nominations for qualified persons to serve as members of the ISAC. DATES: Nominations must be postmarked by January 14, 2008. ADDRESSES: Nominations should be sent to Lori Williams, Executive Director, National Invasive Species Council (OS/NISC), Regular Mail: 1849 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20240; Express Mail: 1201 Eye Street, NW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kelsey Brantley, Program Analyst, at

(202)513-7243, fax:

(202)371-1751, or by e-mail at *Kelsey_Brantley@ios.doi.gov* . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Advisory Committee Scope and Objectives The purpose and role of the ISAC are to provide advice to the National Invasive Species Council (NISC), as authorized by Executive Order 13112, on a broad array of issues including preventing the introduction of invasive species, providing for their control, and minimizing the economic, ecological, and human health impacts that invasive species cause. NISC is Co-chaired by the Secretaries of the Interior, Agriculture, and Commerce, and is charged with providing coordination, planning and leadership regarding invasive species issues. Pursuant to the Executive Order, the Council developed a National Invasive Species Management Plan, which is available on the Web at *http://www.invasivespecies.gov* . The Council is responsible for effective implementation of the Plan including any revisions of the Plan, and also coordinates Federal agency activities concerning invasive species; encourages planning and action at local, tribal, State, regional and ecosystem-based levels; develops recommendations for international cooperation in addressing invasive species; facilitates the development of a coordinated network to document, evaluate, and monitor impacts from invasive species; and facilitates establishment of an information-sharing system on invasive species that utilizes, to the greatest extent practicable, the Internet. The role of ISAC is to maintain an intensive and regular dialogue regarding the aforementioned issues. ISAC provides advice in cooperation with stakeholders and existing organizations addressing invasive species. The ISAC meets up to three

(3)times per year. Terms for many of the current members of the ISAC will expire in June 2008. After consultation with the other members of NISC, the Secretary of the Interior will actively solicit new nominees and appoint members to ISAC. Prospective members of ISAC should be knowledgeable in and represent one or more of the following communities of interests: weed science, fisheries science, rangeland management, forest science, entomology, nematology, plant pathology, veterinary medicine, the broad range of farming or agricultural practices, biodiversity issues, applicable laws and regulations relevant to invasive species policy, risk assessment, biological control of invasive species, public health/epidemiology, industry activities, international affairs or trade, tribal or State government interests, environmental education, ecosystem monitoring, natural resource database design and Integration, and internet-based management of conservation issues. Prospective nominees should also have practical experience in one or more of the following areas: representing sectors of the national economy that are significantly threatened by biological invasions (e.g., agriculture, fisheries, public utilities, recreational users, tourism, etc.); representing sectors of the national economy whose routine operations may pose risks of new or expanded biological invasions (e.g., shipping, forestry, horticulture, aquaculture, pet trade, etc.); developing natural resource management plans on regional or ecosystem-level scales; addressing invasive species issues, including prevention, control and monitoring, in multiple ecosystems and on multiple scales; integrating science and the human dimension in order to create effective solutions to complex conservation issues including education, outreach, and public relations experts; coordinating diverse groups of stakeholders to resolve complex environmental issues and conflicts; and complying with NEPA and other Federal requirements for public involvement in major conservation plans. Members will be selected in order to achieve a balanced representation of viewpoints, so to effectively address invasive species issues under consideration. No member may serve on the ISAC for more than two

(2)consecutive terms. All terms will be limited to three

(3)years in length. Members of the ISAC and its subcommittees serve without pay. However, while away from their homes or regular places of business in the performance of services of the ISAC, members shall be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, in the same manner as persons employed intermittently in the government service, as authorized by section 5703 of Title 5, United States Code. Note: Employees of the Federal Government are not eligible for nomination or appointment to ISAC. Submitting Nominations Nominations should be typed and must include each of the following: 1. A brief summary of no more than two

(2)pages explaining the nominee's suitability to serve on the ISAC. 2. A resume or curriculum vitae. 3. At least two

(2)letters of reference. Incomplete nominations (missing one or more of the items described above) will not be considered. Nominations should be postmarked no later than January 14, 2008, to Lori Williams, Executive Director, National Invasive Species Council (OS/NISC), Regular Mail: 1849 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20240; Express Mail: 1201 Eye Street, NW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20005. The Secretary of the Interior, on behalf of the other members of NISC, is actively soliciting nominations of qualified minorities, women, persons with disabilities and members of low income populations to ensure that recommendations of the ISAC take into account the needs of the diverse groups served. Dated: November 26, 2007. Lori C. Williams, Executive Director, National Invasive Species Council. [FR Doc. E7-23213 Filed 11-29-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310-RK-P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service Information Collection Sent to the Office of Management and Budget

(OMB)for Approval; OMB Control Number 1018-0023; Migratory Bird Surveys AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice; request for comments. SUMMARY: We (Fish and Wildlife Service) have sent an Information Collection Request

(ICR)to OMB for review and approval. The ICR, which is summarized below, describes the nature of the collection and the estimated burden and cost. We are combining three surveys in this ICR because the surveys are interrelated and/or dependent upon each other:

(1)Migratory Bird Hunter Surveys, currently approved under OMB Control No. 1018-0015, which expires February 28, 2008.

(2)Parts Collection Survey, also approved under OMB Control No. 1018-0015.

(3)Sandhill Crane Harvest Survey, currently approved under OMB Control No. 1018-0023, which expires November 30, 2007. We may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. However, under OMB regulations, we may continue to conduct or sponsor this information collection while it is pending at OMB. DATES: You must submit comments on or before December 31, 2007. ADDRESSES: Send your comments and suggestions on this ICR to the Desk Officer for the Department of the Interior at OMB-OIRA at

(202)395-6566

(fax)or OIRA_DOCKET@OMB.eop.gov (e-mail). Please provide a copy of your comments to Hope Grey, Information Collection Clearance Officer, Fish and Wildlife Service, MS 222-ARLSQ, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22203 (mail);

(703)358-2269 (fax); or hope_grey@fws.gov (e-mail). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request additional information about this ICR, contact Hope Grey by mail, fax, or e-mail (see ADDRESSES) or by telephone at

(703)358-2482. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: *OMB Control Number:* 1018-0023. *Title:* Migratory Bird Surveys *Service Form Number(s):* 3-165, 3-165A, 3-165B, 3-165C, 3-165D, 3-165E and 3-2056J-N. *Type of Request:* Revision of currently approved collections. *Affected Public:* States and migratory game bird hunters. *Respondent's Obligation:* Voluntary. *Frequency of Collection:* On occasi Activity Number of annual respondents Number of annual responses Completion time per response Annual burden hours Migratory Bird Harvest Information Program 49 686 185 hours 126,910 Migratory Bird Hunter Survey 85,000 85,000 4.3 minutes 6,100 Parts Collection Survey 13,500 134,600 4.7 minutes 10,436 Sandhill Crane Harvest Survey 7,500 7,500 5 minutes 625 Totals 106,049 227,786 144,071 *Abstract:* The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703-711) and the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956 (16 U.S.C. 742d) designate the Department of the Interior as the key agency responsible for

(1)the wise management of migratory bird populations frequenting the United States, and

(2)setting hunting regulations that allow appropriate harvests that are within the guidelines that will allow for those populations' well-being. These responsibilities dictate that we gather accurate data on various characteristics of migratory bird harvest. Based on information from harvest surveys, we can adjust hunting regulations as needed to optimize harvests at levels that provide a maximum of hunting recreation while keeping populations at desired levels. Under the Migratory Bird Harvest Program, State licensing authorities collect the name and address information needed to provide a sample frame of all licensed migratory bird hunters. Since Federal regulations require that the States collect this information, we are including the associated burden in our approval request to OMB. The Migratory Bird Hunter Survey is based on the Migratory Bird Harvest Information Program, under which each State annually provides a list of all migratory bird hunters in the State. We randomly select migratory bird hunters; send them either a waterfowl questionnaire, a dove and band-tailed pigeon questionnaire, a woodcock questionnaire, or a snipe, rail, gallinule and coot questionnaire; and ask them to report their harvest of those species. The resulting estimates of harvest per hunter are combined with the complete list of migratory bird hunters to provide estimates of the total harvest of those species. The Parts Collection Survey estimates the species, sex, and age composition of the harvest, and the geographic and temporal distribution of the harvest. Randomly selected successful hunters who responded to the Migratory Bird Hunter Survey the previous year are asked to complete and return a postcard if they are willing to participate in the Parts Collection Survey. We provide postage-paid envelopes to respondents before the hunting season and ask them to send in a wing or the tail feathers from each duck, goose, or coot they harvest, or a wing from each woodcock, band-tailed pigeon, snipe, rail, or gallinule they harvest. We use the wings and tail feathers to identify the species, sex, and age of the harvested sample. We also ask respondents to report on the envelope the date and location of harvest for each bird. We combine the results of this survey with the harvest estimates obtained from the Migratory Bird Hunter Survey to provide species-specific national harvest estimates. The combined results of these surveys enable us to evaluate the effects of season length, season dates, and bag limits on the harvest of each species, and thus help us determine appropriate hunting regulations. The Sandhill Crane Harvest Survey is an annual questionnaire survey of people who obtained a sandhill crane hunting permit. At the end of the hunting season, we randomly select a sample of permit holders and ask them to report the date, location, and number of birds harvested for each of their sandhill crane hunts. Their responses provide estimates of the temporal and geographic distribution of the harvest as well as the average harvest per hunter, which, combined with the total number of permits issued, enables us to estimate the total harvest of sandhill cranes. Based on information from this survey, we adjust hunting regulations as needed to optimize harvest at levels that provide a maximum of hunting recreation while keeping the population at the desired level. We are also seeking approval to add a mourning dove wing collection to the Parts Collection Survey on an experimental basis. We will use the wings to identify the age of each sample, thereby providing estimates of annual mourning dove productivity at the management unit level. Those estimates of annual productivity are needed to improve the mourning dove population models that we have developed for each management unit. We will compare the results and costs of our experimental mail survey with results and costs of mourning dove wing collection methods that are currently employed by some, but not all, States that have dove hunting seasons. If mourning dove productivity estimates are similar for the two methods, we would propose to adopt the more cost-effective method on a national scale. *Comments:* On March 16, 2007, we published in the Federal Register (72 FR 12628) a notice of our intent to request that OMB renew approval for this information collection. In that notice, we solicited comments for 60 days, ending on May 16, 2007. We received one comment. The commenter did not address the information collection requirements, but did protest the entire migratory bird hunting regulations process, surveys and monitoring programs, and the killing of all migratory birds. Our long-term objectives continue to include providing opportunities to harvest portions of certain migratory game bird populations and limit harvest to levels compatible with each population's ability to maintain healthy, viable numbers. Our harvest surveys are an integral part of our monitoring programs, which provide the information that we need to ensure harvest levels are commensurate with current status of migratory game bird populations and long-term population goals. We again invite comments concerning this information collection on:

(1)whether or not the collection of information is necessary, including whether or not the information will have practical utility;

(2)the accuracy of our estimate of the burden for this collection of information;

(3)ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and

(4)ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents. Comments that you submit in response to this notice are a matter of public record. Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment, including your personal identifying information, may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask OMB in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that it will be done. Dated: November 14, 2007 Hope Grey, Information Collection Clearance Officer, Fish and Wildlife Service. FR Doc. E7-23197 Filed 11-29-07;8:45am BILLING CODE 4310-55-S DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service Sport Fishing and Boating Partnership Council AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of teleconference. SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce a public teleconference of the Sport Fishing and Boating Partnership Council (Council). DATES: We will hold the teleconference on Monday, December 17, 2007, 2-4 p.m. (Eastern time). If you wish to listen to the teleconference proceedings, submit written material for the Council to consider, or give a 2-minute presentation during the teleconference, notify Douglas Hobbs by Friday, December 7, 2007. If you wish to submit a written statement for Council consideration during the teleconference, we must receive it no later than December 13, 2007. See instructions under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Douglas Hobbs, Council Coordinator, 4401 N. Fairfax Dr., Mailstop 3103-AEA, Arlington, VA 22203;

(703)358-2336 (phone);

(703)358-2548 (fax), or *doug_hobbs@fws.gov* (e-mail). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background In accordance with the requirements of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App., we give notice that the Council will hold a teleconference on Monday, December 17, 2007, from 2 to 4 p.m. The Council was formed in January 1993 to advise the Secretary of the Interior, through the Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, on nationally significant recreational fishing, boating, and aquatic resource conservation issues. The Council represents the interests of the public and private sectors of the sport fishing, boating, and conservation communities and is organized to enhance partnerships among industry, constituency groups, and government. The 18-member Council, appointed by the Secretary of the Interior, includes the Service Director and the president of the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, who both serve in ex officio capacities. Other Council members are directors from State agencies responsible for managing recreational fish and wildlife resources and individuals who represent the interests of saltwater and freshwater recreational fishing, recreational boating, the recreational fishing and boating industries, recreational fisheries resource conservation, Native American tribes, aquatic resource outreach and education, and tourism. Background information on the Council is available at *http://www.fws.gov/sfbpc.* The Council will convene to:

(1)Approve recommendations to the Director of the Fish and Wildlife Service for funding Fiscal Year 2008 Boating Infrastructure Grant proposals; and

(2)to consider other Council business. We will post the final agenda on the Internet at *http://www.fws.gov/sfbpc.* Procedures for Public Input Format Requirements for Oral and Written Commenters Whether you wish to comment orally or in written form, you must provide us with written copies of your comments. All written statements must be supplied to the Council Coordinator in *both* of the following formats: • One hard copy with original signature, and • One electronic copy via e-mail (acceptable file format: Adobe Acrobat PDF, WordPerfect, MS Word, MS PowerPoint, or Rich Text files in IBM-PC/Windows 98/2000/XP format). Giving a 2-Minute Oral Presentation Individuals or groups may request to give an oral presentation during the Council teleconference. Oral presentations will be limited to 2 minutes per speaker, with no more than half an hour total for all speakers. Interested parties must contact Douglas Hobbs, Council Coordinator, in writing (preferably via e-mail; see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT ), by Friday, December 7, 2007, to be placed on the public speaker list for this teleconference. In addition, if you are selected to make a 2-minute presentation, you must provide hard and electronic copies of your presentation to the Council Coordinator by Thursday, December 13, 2007. Additional live questions from the public will not be considered during the teleconference. Submitting Written Information for the Council To Consider Speakers who wish to expand upon their oral statements or those who had wished to speak but could not be accommodated on the agenda are invited to submit written statements to the Council. Interested members of the public may submit relevant written information for the Council to consider during the public teleconference. We must receive all written statements by Thursday, December 13, 2007, so that we can make the information available to the Council for their consideration prior to the teleconference. Council Minutes The Council Coordinator will maintain the teleconference's summary minutes, which will be available for public inspection at the location under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT during regular business hours within 30 days after the teleconference. You may purchase personal copies for the cost of duplication. Dated: November 20, 2007. Geoffrey L. Haskett, Acting Director. [FR Doc. E7-23345 Filed 11-29-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310-55-P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management [CO-800-1430-ES; COC-71969] Notice of Realty Action: Recreation and Public Purposes (R&PP) Act Classification; Colorado AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management

(BLM)has examined and found suitable for classification for lease and subsequent conveyance under the provision of the Recreation and Public Purposes (R&PP) Act, as amended, 43 U.S.C. 869 *et seq.,* and under sec. 7 of the Taylor Grazing Act, 43 U.S.C. 315f, and E.O. 6910, eighty acres of land in Archuleta County, Colorado. Archuleta County proposes to use the land for public recreation purposes. DATES: Interested parties may submit comments regarding the proposed lease/conveyance or classification of the lands until January 14, 2008. ADDRESSES: Mail written comments to Pagosa Springs Field Manager, Bureau of Land Management, P.O. Box 310, Pagosa Springs, Colorado 81147. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charlie Higby, BLM Realty Specialist, 15 Burnett Court, Durango, Colorado 81301 or phone

(970)385-1374. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following described public lands in Archuleta County, Colorado have been examined and found suitable for classification for lease and subsequent conveyance under the provisions of the Recreation and Public Purposes (R&PP) Act, as amended, 43 U.S.C. 869 *et seq.,* and under Sec. 7 of the Taylor Grazing Act, 43 U.S.C. 315f, and E.O. 6910, and are hereby classified accordingly. Archuleta County proposes to use the land for: Softball fields, soccer fields, skate-park; outdoor amphitheater; trail system; tennis courts; and associated restroom/concession/storage buildings. The land is approximately three miles northwest of Pagosa Springs, Colorado. New Mexico Principal Meridian, Colorado T. 35 N., R. 2 W., Sec. 4, SW 1/4 NE 1/4 , and NE 1/4 SE 1/4 . The area described contains approximately 80 acres. The land is not required for any Federal purpose. Lease/conveyance of the land is consistent with the BLM San Juan/San Miguel Resource Management Plan dated September 1985, and would be in the public interest. The lease/conveyance of the lands, when issued, will be subject to the provisions of the R&PP Act and applicable regulations of the Secretary of the Interior and will contain the following terms, conditions, and reservations to the United States: 1. A right-of-way thereon for ditches and canals constructed by the authority of the United States pursuant to the Act of August 30, 1890 (43 U.S.C. 945). 2. All mineral deposits in the lands shall be reserved to the United States together with the right to prospect for, mine and remove such deposits from the same under applicable law and such regulations as the Secretary of the Interior may prescribe, including all necessary access and exit rights. 3. All valid existing rights 4. A right-of-way, across the above described lands, for access road purposes granted to Williams Family Trust, its successors or assigns, by right-of-way COC-56189, pursuant to the Act of October 21, 1976 (90 Stat. 2776; 43 U.S.C. 1761). Upon publication of this notice in the **Federal Register** the lands will be segregated from all other forms of appropriation under the public land laws, including the general mining laws, except for lease/conveyance under the Recreation and Public Purposes Act, leasing under the mineral leasing laws, and disposals under the mineral material disposal laws. *Classification Comments:* Interested persons may submit comments involving the suitability of the land for development for public recreation facilities. Comments on the classification are restricted to whether the land is physically suited for the proposal, whether the use will maximize the future use or uses of the land, whether the use is consistent with local planning and zoning, or if the use is consistent with state and federal programs. *Application Comments:* Interested persons may submit comments, including notification of any encumbrances or other claim relating to the parcel, and regarding the specific use proposed in the application and plan of development, whether the BLM followed proper administrative procedures in reaching the decision to lease/convey under the R&PP Act, or any other factors not directly related to the suitability of the land for public recreation facilities. Any adverse comments will be reviewed by the BLM Colorado State Director, who may sustain, vacate, or modify this realty action in whole or in part. In the absence of any adverse comments, the classification will become effective on January 29, 2008. Only written comments submitted by postal service or overnight mail to the Field Manager, BLM Pagosa Springs Field Office, will be considered properly filed. Electronic mail, facsimile or telephone comments will not be considered properly filed. Documents related to this action are on file at the BLM Pagosa Springs Field Office at the address above and may be reviewed by the public at their request. Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, be advised that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold from public review your personal identifying information, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. If you wish to have your name or address withheld from public disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, you must state it prominently at the beginning of your comments. Any determination by the BLM to release or withhold the names and/or addresses of those who comment will be made on a case-by-case basis. Such requests will be honored to the extent allowed by law. BLM will make available for public review, in their entirety, all comments submitted by businesses or organizations, including comments by individuals in their capacity as an official or representative of an organization or business. Authority: 43 Code of Federal Regulations

(CFR)2741.5. Dated: November 19, 2007. Kevin Khung, Pagosa Field Office Manager. [FR Doc. E7-23228 Filed 11-29-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management [NV-040-1610-DQ] Notice of Availability of the Proposed Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Ely Field Office, Nevada AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior. ACTION: Notice of Availability. SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321 *et seq.* ) and under the authority of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA, 43 U.S.C. 1701 *et seq.* ), the Bureau of Land Management

(BLM)has prepared a Proposed Resource Management Plan/Final Environmental Impact Statement (PRMP/FEIS) for public lands and resources administered by the Ely Field Office, Nevada. DATES: The BLM Planning Regulations set forth the provisions applicable to protests (43 CFR 1610.5-2). A person who meets the conditions as described in the regulations cited above, and who wishes to file a protest must file said protest within 30 days of the date this notice is published in the **Federal Register.** Additional information on protests is set forth in the Dear Reader letter of the Ely Proposed RMP and Final EIS and in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this notice. To ensure compliance with the protest regulations, please consult the BLM's Planning regulations at 43 CFR 1610.5-2. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information and/or to have your name added to the mailing list, contact Jeff Weeks, RMP Project Manager, 702 North Industrial Way, Ely, Nevada 89301,

(775)289-1825, or correspond by e-mail to *elyrmp@blm.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Ely RMP planning area is located in east-central Nevada in Lincoln, White Pine and a portion of Nye counties. The planning area addressed in the RMP/EIS contains approximately 11,500,000 acres of public lands administered by the BLM Ely Field Office and the Caliente Field Station. The PRMP/FEIS focuses on the principles of multiple use and sustained yield as prescribed by section 202 of the FLPMA. The following entities participated in development of the RMP as cooperating agencies with special expertise: Great Basin National Park; Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest; Nellis Air Force Base; Nevada Department of Transportation; Nevada Division of Minerals; Nevada Department of Wildlife; Nevada State Historic Preservation Office; Lincoln County; Nye County; White Pine County; Duckwater Shoshone Tribe; Ely Shoshone Tribe; Moapa Band of Paiutes; and the Yomba Shoshone Tribe. The public involvement and collaboration process implemented for this effort included six open houses during scoping; presentations to interested organizations upon their invitation; presentations to and suggestions from the Mojave/Southern Great Basin and the Northeastern Great Basin resource advisory councils; distribution of information via the Ely RMP website and periodic newsletters; six public meetings on the Draft RMP/EIS; and public and agency review and comment on the Draft RMP/EIS. A copy of the PRMP/FEIS will be sent to individuals, groups, and agencies who requested a copy, or as required by regulation or policy. The PRMP/FEIS considers and analyzes five

(5)alternatives, including the BLM's Proposed RMP, the No Action Alternative (continuation of existing management), and alternatives that emphasize restoration of ecological systems, commodity production, and exclusion of permitted discretionary uses. These alternatives were developed based on public input including public scoping comments; numerous meetings with local, county, state, tribal, and federal agencies (cooperating agencies); informal meetings with interested organizations upon their request; and public and agency comments on the Draft RMP/EIS. The alternatives provide for an array of alternative land use allocations and variable levels of commodity production and resource protection and restoration. After any protests are resolved and any pertinent adjustments are made, an approved RMP and Record of Decision are expected to be available by the end of 2007. The issues addressed in the formulation of alternatives include maintenance and restoration of resiliency of vegetation within the Great Basin and Mojave Desert, protection and management of habitats for special status species, upland and riparian habitat management, noxious weed control, commercial uses (including livestock grazing, special recreation permits, mineral development, oil and gas leasing, rights-of-way, and communication use areas), designation of areas of critical environmental concern (ACECs), travel management, land disposal, and management of wild horses. The Proposed RMP would retain three existing ACECs: Beaver Dam Slope ACEC (36,800 acres), Kane Springs ACEC (61,680 acres), Mormon Mesa ACEC (109,680 acres) and would designate 17 new ACECs (114,270 acres) for a total of 322,430 acres, which is less than 3 percent of the planning area. The new ACECs include: Baker Archaeological Site ACEC (80 acres). Baking Powder Flat ACEC (13,640). Blue Mass Scenic Area ACEC (950 acres). Condor Canyon ACEC (4,500 acres). Hendry's Creek/Rock Animal Corral ACEC (3,650 acres). Highland Range ACEC (6,900 acres). Honeymoon Hills/City of Rocks ACEC (3,900 acres). Lower Meadow Valley Wash ACEC (25,000 acres). Mount Irish ACEC (15,100 acres). Pahroc Rock Art ACEC (2,400 acres). Rose Guano Bat Cave ACEC (40 acres). Schlesser Pincushion ACEC (4,930 acres). Shooting Gallery ACEC (15,600 acres). Shoshone Ponds ACEC (1,240 acres). Snake Creek Indian Burial Cave ACEC (40 acres). Swamp Cedar ACEC (3,200 acres). White River Valley ACEC (13,100 acres). The following types of resource use limitations would generally apply to these ACECs:

(1)Motorized travel would be limited to designated roads and trails;

(2)limited collection of plants in ACECs designated for the protection of special status plants;

(3)limitations on livestock grazing in ACECs designated for protection of special status plants and animals;

(4)limits on land disposal and rights-of-way; and

(5)closure or limits on new mineral development (mineral leasing, locatable minerals and mineral material disposal) to protect unique cultural values, special status plants and animals. For detailed information, see Section 2.4.22 of the PRMP/FEIS. Documents pertinent to the PRMP/FEIS will be available for public review at the Ely Field Office, 702 North Industrial Way, Ely, Nevada during regular business hours, 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays. Review copies of the PRMP/FEIS are available at the following locations in and near the planning area: BLM Caliente Field Station. BLM Elko Field Office. BLM Ely Field Office. BLM Las Vegas Field Office. BLM Nevada State Office. Forest Service Ely Ranger District. Great Basin National Park. Lincoln County Courthouse. Lincoln County Public Library. Nye County Courthouse. Nye County Public Library. White Pine County Courthouse. White Pine County Public Library. The PRMP/FEIS may also be viewed and downloaded in PDF format at the Ely RMP Web site at *http://www.blm.gov/nv/st/en/fo/ely_field_office.html.* As noted above, instructions for filing a protest with the Director of the BLM regarding the PRMP/FEIS may be found at 43 CFR 1610.5-2. Electronic mail and facsimile protests will be considered only if the protesting party provides BLM with the original letter by either regular or overnight mail postmarked by the close of the protest period. Under those conditions, the BLM will consider the electronic or facsimile version as an advance copy and it will receive full consideration. If you wish to provide the BLM with such advance notification, please direct faxed protests to the attention of the BLM protest coordinator at

(202)452-5112, and e-mails to *Brenda_Hudgens-Williams@blm.gov.* All protests must be in writing and mailed to one of the following addresses: *Regular Mail:* Director (210), Attention: Brenda Williams, P.O. Box 66538, Washington, DC 20035. *Overnight Mail:* Director (210), Attention: Brenda Williams, 1620 L Street, NW., Suite 1075, Washington, DC 20036. Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your protest, you should be aware that your entire protest—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your protest to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. As provided in 43 CFR 1610.5-2(a)(3), “The Director shall promptly render a decision on the protest. The decision shall be in writing and shall set forth the reasons for the decision. The decision shall be sent to the protesting party by certified mail, return receipt requested. The decision of the Director shall be the final decision of the Department of the Interior.” Ron Wenker, State Director. [FR Doc. E7-23190 Filed 11-29-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310-HC-P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service 30-Day Notice of Submission to the Office of Management and Budget; Opportunity for Public Comment AGENCY: Department of Interior, National Park Service. ACTION: Notice and request for comments. SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507 et seq.) and 5 CFR Part 1320, Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements, the National Park Service

(NPS)invites public comments on a revision of a currently approved collection (OMB 1024-0038). DATES: Public comments on this Information Collection Request

(ICR)will be accepted on or before December 31, 2007. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments directly to the Desk Officer for the Department of the Interior (OMB #1024-0038), Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, by fax at 202/395-6566, or by electronic mail at *oira_docket@omb.eop.gov.* Please also send a copy of your comments to John W. Renaud, Project Coordinator, Historic Preservation Grants, Heritage Assistance Programs, NPS, 1849 C St., NW. (2256), Washington, DC 20240; or via fax at 202/371-1961; or via e-mail at *John_Renaud@nps.gov.* FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John W. Renaud, Project coordinator, Historic Preservation Grants, Heritage Assistance Programs, NPS, 1849 C St., NW. (2256), Washington, DC 20240; or via fax at 202/371-1961; or via e-mail at *John_Renaud@nps.gov,* or via telephone at 202/354-2066. You are entitled to a copy of the entire ICR package free-of-charge. *Comments Received on the 60-Day* **Federal Register** *Notice:* The NPS published a 60-Day Notice to solicit public comment on this ICR in the **Federal Register** on August 1, 2007 (Vol. 72, No. 147, Pages 42106-42108). The comment period closed on October 1, 2007. The NPS received no comments as a result of the publication of this 60-Day **Federal Register** Notice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: *Title:* Procedures for State, Tribal, and Local Government Historic Preservation Programs; 36 CFR part 61. *Bureau Form Number(s):* None. *OMB Number:* 1024-0038. *Expiration Date of Approval:* November 30, 2007. *Type of Request:* Revision of a currently approved collection of information. *Description of Need:* This set of information collections has an impact on State, tribal, and local governments that wish to participate formally in the National Historic Preservation Partnership

(NHPP)Program, and State and tribal governments that wish to apply for Historic Preservation Fund

(HPF)grants. The NPS uses the information collections to ensure compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.) as well as the government-wide grant requirements that OMB has issued and the Department of the Interior implements through 43 CFR part 12. This information collection also produces performance data that NPS uses to assess its progress in meeting goals set in Departmental and NPS strategic plans created pursuant to the 1993 Government Performance and Results Act, as amended. This request for OMB approval includes local government burden for information collections associated with various aspects of the Certified Local Government

(CLG)program; State government burden for information collections related to the CLG program, the program-specific aspects of the HPF grants to States, maintenance of a State inventory of historic and prehistoric properties, tracking State Historic preservation Office historic preservation consultation with Federal agencies, reporting on other State historic preservation accomplishments, and the State role in the State Program Review Process; and tribal government burden for information collections related to the program-specific aspects of HPF grants to THPOs. This request includes information collections related to HPF grants to States and to Tribal Historic Preservation Officers/Offices (THPOs). NPS is seeking the revision to reflect the increased number of partners participating in the NHPP and consequently in the previously approved information collections. In addition, a revision is needed because some information collections had not been recognized as such during preparation for earlier OMB approvals. Section 101(b) of the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, (16 U.S.C. 470a(b)) specifies the role of States in the NHPP program. Section 101(c), section 103(c), and section 301 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 470a(c), 16 U.S.C. 470c(c), and 16 U.S.C. 470w) specify the role of local governments in the NHPP program. Section 101(d) of the Act (16 U.S.C. 470a(d)) specifies the role of tribes in the NHPP program. Section 108 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 470h) created the HPF to support activities that carry out the purposes of the Act. Section 101(e)(1) of the Act (16 U.S.C. 470a(e)) directs the Secretary of the Interior through the NPS to “administer a program of matching grants to the States for the purposes of carrying out” the Act. Similarly, sections 101(d) and 101(e) of the Act direct a program of grants to THPOs for carrying out their responsibilities under the Act. Each year Congress directs NPS to use part of the annual appropriation from the HPF for the State grant program and the tribal grant program. The purpose of both the HPF State grants program and the HPF THPO grants program is to assist States and tribes in carrying out their statutory role in the national historic preservation program. HPF grants to States and THPOs are program grants; i.e., each State/THPO selects its own HPF-eligible activities and projects. Each HPF grant to a State/THPO has two years of fund availability. At the end of the first year, NPS employs a “Use or Lose” policy to ensure efficient and effective use of the grant funds. All 59 States, territories, and the District of Columbia participate in the NHPP program. Almost 1,600 local governments have become Certified Local Governments

(CLGs)in order to participate in the NHPP program. Approximately 54 local governments become CLGs each year. Fifty-seven federally-recognized tribes have joined formally the NHPP and have established Tribal Historic Preservation Officers and tribal historic preservation offices. Typically, each year five to seven tribes join the partnership. NPS developed the information collections associated with 36 CFR Part 61 in consultation with State, Tribal, and local government partners. The obligation to respond is required to provide information to evaluate whether or not State, tribal, and local governments meet minimum standards and requirements for participation in the NHPP program; and to meet government-wide requirements for Federal grant programs. Comments are invited on:

(1)Practical utility of the information being gathered;

(2)the accuracy of the burden hour estimate;

(3)ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and

(4)ways to minimize the burden to respondents, including use of automated information collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. *Automated data collection:* NPS has made available to States for completion on-line all of the forms for the HPF State Grants program. *Frequency of collection:* Annually. *Description of respondents:* State, tribal, and local governments that wish to participate formally in the National Historic Preservation partnership Program and who wish to apply for Historic Preservation fund grant assistance. *Estimated average number of respondents/record keepers:* The net number of partners participating in this set of information collections annually is 59 States, territories, and the District of Columbia, 57 Tribes, and 1,554 CLGs. *Estimated average number of responses:* NPS estimates that there are 35,927 responses per year. This is the gross number of responses for all of the elements included in this set of information collections. *Estimated average number of State HPF grant-related applicant responses:* 58 per year. *Estimated average gross number of State HPF grant-related grantee responses:* 407 per year. *Estimated average gross number of State HPF grant-related responses for successful Applicants/Grantees:* 465 per year. *Estimate average number of THPO HPF grant-related Applicant responses:* 57 per year. *Estimate average gross number of THPO HPF grant-related grantee responses:* 143 per year. *Estimated average gross number of THPO HPF application plus grant-related responses:* 200 per year. *Estimated average number of State and local CLG program related responses per State/CLG:* 44 per year. *Estimated average gross number State and local CLG program related responses for all States/CLGs:* 2,936 per year. *Estimated average minimum number of State inventory responses per State:* 78 per year. *Estimated average gross minimum number of State inventory responses for all States:* 4,602 per year. *Estimated average minimum number of State consultation on Federal project responses per State:* 445 per year. *Estimated average gross minimum number of State consultation of Federal projects responses for all States:* 26,255 per year. *Estimated average number of other State performance reports per State:* 1 per year. *Estimated average gross number of other State performance reports for all States:* 25 per year. *Estimated average minimum number of State Program Reviews per State:* 1 per year. *Estimated average gross minimum number of State Program Reviews for all States:* 14 per year. *Estimated average gross number of responses for all non-grant collections:* 33,793 per year. *Estimated average time burden per respondent:* NPS estimates that the total public (State plus local) burden for the Certified Local Government

(CLG)program averages 36 hours per CLG for the certification, monitoring, and evaluation of each CLG and 45 minutes for reporting of other CLG accomplishments. NPS estimates that the total public (State) burden averages 10 minutes per Federal agency project tracked, 45 minutes per inventory record, 2 hours per reporting on other State accomplishments, and 90 hours per State Program Review. NPS estimates that the total public burden for collections not directly tied to grants is 129 hours per respondent. NPS estimates that the public burden for the HPF-supported State grant program collections of information will average 12 hours per application and 17 hours per grant per year for all of the grant-related collections. The combined total public burden for the HPF State grant program-related information collections would average 29 hours per successful applicant/grantee. NPS estimates that the total public burden for the HPF THPO grant program-related information collections would average 14 hours per successful applicant/grantee. These burden estimates are a one-year average for the two-year grants. The combined total public burden for the 36 CFR part 61-related information collections would average 133 hours per partner. These estimates of burden include time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and reviewing the collection of information. *Estimated average burden hours per State HPF grant-related Applicant response:* 12 hours. *Estimated average burden hours per State HPF grant-related Grantee response:* 17 hours. *Estimated total annual average burden hours per State HPF grant-related respondent:* 29 hours. *Estimated total annual average burden hours for all State HPF grant-related responses:* 1,541 hours. *Estimated average annual burden hours per THPO HPF grant-related Applicant/Grantee for all responses:* 14 hours. *Estimated total annual average burden hours for all THPO HPF grant-related respondents:* 781 hours. *Estimated average burden hours in the CLG program per response:* 12 hours. *Estimated average burden hours in the State inventory program per response:* 40 minutes. *Estimated average burden hours in the Federal agency consultation tracking program per response:* 10 minutes. *Estimated average burden hours in other performance reporting per response:* 3 hours. *Estimated average burden hours in the State Program Review program per response:* 90 hours. *Estimated average annual burden hours per partner for all non grant-related responses:* 710 hours. *Estimated Annual Burden on all Respondents for all non grant-related responses:* 33,606 hours. *Frequency of response:* The frequency of response varies depending upon the activity. In the CLG program, States and local governments participate once for the certification process, once per year for the monitoring of each CLG, once every four years for the evaluation of each CLG, and once a year on a voluntary basis for other performance reporting. Each State adds property records to its inventory and tracks the progress of consultation with Federal agencies as the information becomes available. Each State reports once a year on a voluntary basis for other performance reporting. The National Historic Preservation Act requires that each State undergo a State Program Review every four years. For the program-specific aspects of the HPF grants to State program, the estimated number of responses includes a “Cumulative Products Table” of projected performance in summary format, an “Organization Chart” showing the availability of appropriately qualified staff, and a (major) “Anticipated Activities List”. During the grant cycle, grantees seek NPS approval once for a subgrant (via a project notification) and associated final project report. Each year, every State submits an “End of Year Report” that includes the Cumulative Products Table (which compares actual to proposed performance), a “Sources of Nonfederal Matching Share Report,” a “Project/Activity Database Report,” an “Unexpended Carryover Funds Table and Carryover Statement,” and a “Significant Preservation Accomplishments Summary.” For the program-specific aspects of the HPF grants to THPOs program, the estimated number of responses includes a grant application scope of work, a “Grants Product Summary Table,” an unexpended funds carry-over statement, and a “THPO Annual Report” (a narrative summary of important accomplishments). *Estimated total annual burden:* NPS estimates that the estimated combined annual burden on all respondents for all responses will be 35,927 hours. Dated: November 27, 2007. Leonard E. Stowe, NPS, Information Collection Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. 07-5889 Filed 11-29-07; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 17

Traces to 17 documents

U.S. Code