Notices. Notice
4,375 words·~20 min read·
/register/2007/08/14/07-3945A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
BILLING CODE 4910-60-M DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Surface Transportation Board [STB Ex Parte No. 664] Methodology To Be Employed in Determining the Railroad Industry's Cost of Capital AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board, DOT. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Board proposes to revise its method for calculating the railroad industry's cost of capital by computing the cost of equity using a capital asset pricing model. DATES: Comments on this proposal are due by September 13, 2007.
Reply comments are due by October 15, 2007. ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted either via that Board's e-filing format or in the traditional paper format. Any person using e-filing should attach a document and otherwise comply with the instructions at the E-FILING link on the Board's Web site, at *http://www.stb.dot.gov.* Any person submitting a filing in the traditional paper format should send an original and 10 copies to: Surface Transportation Board, Attn: STB Ex Parte No. 664, 395 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423-0001.
Copies of written comments will be available from the Board's contractor, ASAP Document Solutions (mailing address: Suite 103, 9332 Annapolis Rd., Lanham, MD 20706; e-mail address: *asapdc@verizon.net;* telephone number: 202-306-4004). The comments will also be available for viewing and self-copying at the Board's Public Docket Room, Room 131, and will be posted to the Board's Web site. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul A. Aguiar at
(202)245-0323. [Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through the Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS)at 1-800-877-8339.] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Surface Transportation Board (the Board) has issued a notice seeking public comments on the following proposed change to the methodology to calculate the railroad industry's cost of capital. To calculate the cost of equity component of the cost of capital, we propose to replace the Discounted Cash Flow method currently used with a Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). To calculate the cost of equity, we propose to use the following simple single-Beta version of the CAPM model: Cost of equity = RF + β*RP. In this equation, RF is the annual economy-wide risk-free rate, RP is the annual market-wide risk premium, and β (or Beta) is the measure of systematic, non-diversifiable risk of a particular carrier. The industry-wide cost of capital will be determined as a weighted average of individual railroad costs, using the same methodology as is used now. To calculate the annual risk-free rate, we propose to use the 10-year Treasury Bond rate. The FRB uses a short-term Treasury Bill rate and the CTA uses both short-term and long-term rates. We believe a longer rate is superior and the 10-year is the longest Treasury Bond that has been continuously issued. A comprehensive study found that 70% of corporate and financial advisors use Treasury bond yields of maturities of 10 years or greater. *See* Bruner, Eades, Harris, and Higgins, *Best Practices in Estimating the Cost of Capital: Survey and Synthesis,* Fin. Practice & Educ. at 13-29 (Spring/Summer 1998) ( *Best Practices* ). Moreover, the risk-free rate used by investors should be risk free over the time period of the investment, and railroad assets are often long-lived. Finally, an advantage of using long-term rates is that they contain long-term inflation expectations. Using a 10-year risk-free rate therefore makes the proposed CAPM calculation more forward looking. To calculate the annual market-wide risk premium, we propose to use monthly New York Stock Exchange
(NYSE)data over a 50-year time period. Because this calculation is essentially an average return, a longer time period is usually chosen. We invite comments on the appropriate time period. While we propose to calculate the market risk premium each year, we also seek comments on the use of a fixed number instead. To calculate the Beta for each carrier, we propose to use that carrier's monthly, merger-adjusted 1 stock return data for the prior 10 years in the following standard equation: 1 “Merger-adjusted” means that, in instances where a carrier has been formed by merger of several predecessor railroads, data for the shares of predecessor railroads are included in such a way as to show total performance as if the merger had already occurred. R − RF = β (RM − RF) + ε R = merger-adjusted monthly stock return for the railroad; RF = monthly 10-year U.S. Treasury bond rate; RM = monthly return on the NYSE; and ε = random error term Using a simple, ordinary least squares
(OLS)regression technique, the Board would estimate β, the coefficient of systematic, non-diversifiable risk. OLS regression technique is a simple but accepted statistical tool one can use to develop an unbiased estimate of the true Beta. There would always be 120 months of data. Each year, 12 months of new data would be added to the data set and the oldest 12 months of observations would be removed. In selecting a 10-year time period to estimate Beta, we seek to balance the desire to eliminate statistical noise and achieve stability in the estimate, while allowing for the fact that Beta may change over time. Using earlier data might cause results to be skewed by events that are no longer important. On the other hand, using a shorter timeframe—while capturing changes in industry risk profiles more rapidly—would introduce more variability and noise in the estimate. We also invite comment on the use of 25-year or 5-year time periods. Anything less than five years appears to add too much noise. Green, Lopez, & Wang, *Formulating the Imputed Cost of Equity Capital for Priced Services at Federal Reserve Banks,* FRBYU Econ. Policy Rev. at 70 (Sept. 2003). We invite comments on whether it would be reasonable to assume that Beta equals 1, thereby eliminating the need to estimate Beta. Finance theory predicts that Beta will move towards 1 over time, and this has proved true for banks and other firms that provide payment processing services. *See* Hearing Tr. at 25. We also invite comments on the inclusion of an intercept term in the regression. We have reviewed and reject other suggested changes to our existing procedures. First, we reject WCTL's suggestion that parties should be permitted to argue for an alternate approach to be used in a particular year. Second, we will not adjust the debt portion of capital to reflect the capitalization of operating leases, as requested by WCTL. Third, we reject WCTL's suggestion to replace the current-year debt-to-equity ratio with a multi-year average to avoid alleged “artificial” fluctuations in the capital structure used to calculate the weighted average. Finally, we will not expand the scope of this rulemaking to re-examine how this cost-of-capital determination is used in the Board's annual revenue adequacy determinations and consider using a replacement-cost analysis, as suggested by the AAR. In a decision served on August 14, 2007, the Board has discussed each of these proposals in detail and explained how each addresses concerns raised in this proceeding. Because these proposals have significance for rail carriers and their shippers, all interested parties are invited to comment. Additional information is contained in the Board's decision. To obtain a free copy of the full decision, visit the Board's *http://www.stb.dot.gov* Web site. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the Board certifies that the proposed action should not have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or the conservation of energy resources. Decided: August 8, 2007. By the Board, Chairman Nottingham, Vice Chairman Buttrey, and Commissioner Mulvey. Vernon A. Williams, Secretary. [FR Doc. E7-15888 Filed 8-13-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4915-01-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Surface Transportation Board [STB Finance Docket No. 35044] Buffalo & Pittsburgh Railroad Inc.—Lease and Operation Exemption—Norfolk Southern Railway Company AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board, DOT. ACTION: Notice of exemption. SUMMARY: Under 49 U.S.C. 10502, the Board is granting a petition for exemption from the prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 10902 for Buffalo & Pittsburgh Railroad, Inc., a Class II rail carrier, to lease and operate approximately 35.9 miles of a line of railroad owned by the Norfolk Southern Railway Company. The rail line extends from milepost BR 8.8 near Gravity, NY, to milepost BR 44.7+/−, immediately south of the northbound home signal and insulated joint for CP-Machias near Machias, NY. The exemption is subject to employee protective conditions. DATES: The exemption will be effective on August 27, 2007. Petitions to stay must be filed by August 21, 2007. Petitions to reopen must be filed by September 4, 2007. ADDRESSES: An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB Finance Docket No. 35044, must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, one copy of all pleadings must be served on petitioner's representative: Eric M. Hocky, Gollatz, Griffin & Ewing, P.C., Four Penn Center, Suite 200, 1600 John F. Kennedy Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19103-2808. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph H. Dettmar,
(202)245-0395. [Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through the Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS)at 1-800-877-8339.] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the Board's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write to, e-mail, or call: ASAP Document Solutions, 9332 Annapolis Rd., Suite 103, Lanham, MD 20706; e-mail *asapdc@verizon.net;* telephone:
(202)306-4004. [Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through FIRS at 1-800-877-8339.] Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at *http://www.stb.dot.gov.* Decided: August 8, 2007. By the Board, Chairman Nottingham, Vice Chairman Buttrey, and Commissioner Mulvey. Vernon A. Williams, Secretary. [FR Doc. E7-15861 Filed 8-13-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4915-01-P DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Office of the Comptroller of the Currency [Docket ID OCC-2007-0013] BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM [Docket No. OP-1292] FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Office of Thrift Supervision [Docket ID OTS-2007-0016] NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION Proposed Illustrations of Consumer Information for Subprime Mortgage Lending AGENCIES: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Treasury (OCC); Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board); Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC); Office of Thrift Supervision, Treasury (OTS); and National Credit Union Administration (NCUA). ACTION: Notice of proposed illustrations of consumer information with request for comment. SUMMARY: The OCC, Board, FDIC, OTS, and NCUA (the Agencies), request comment on these Proposed Illustrations of Consumer Information for Subprime Mortgage Lending. The illustrations are intended to assist institutions in providing consumer information as discussed in the consumer protection portion of the Agencies' Statement on Subprime Mortgage Lending (Subprime Statement). The illustrations are not intended as model forms, and institutions will not be required to use them. Rather, they are provided to respond to the requests of commenters that the Agencies provide uniform disclosures for, or illustrations of, the type of consumer information contemplated by the Subprime Statement. DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before October 15, 2007. ADDRESSES: The Agencies will jointly review all of the comments submitted. Therefore, interested parties may send comments to any of the Agencies and need not send comments (or copies) to all of the Agencies. Please consider submitting your comments by e-mail or fax, since paper mail in the Washington area and at the Agencies is subject to delay. Interested parties are invited to submit comments to: *OCC:* You may submit comments by any of the following methods: • *E-mail: regs.comments@occ.treas.gov.* • *Fax:*
(202)874-4448. • *Mail:* Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 250 E Street, SW., Mail Stop 1-5, Washington, DC 20219. • *Hand Delivery/Courier:* 250 E Street, SW., Attn: Public Information Room, Mail Stop 1-5, Washington, DC 20219. *Instructions:* You must include “OCC” as the agency name and “Docket ID OCC-2007-0013” in your comment. In general, OCC will enter all comments received into the docket without change, including any business or personal information that you provide such as name and address information, e-mail addresses, or phone numbers. Comments, including attachments and other supporting materials, received are part of the public record and subject to public disclosure. Do not enclose any information in your comment or supporting materials that you consider confidential or inappropriate for public disclosure. You may review comments and other related materials by any of the following methods: • *Viewing Comments Personally:* You may personally inspect and photocopy comments at the OCC's Public Information Room, 250 E Street, SW., Washington, DC. For security reasons, the OCC requires that visitors make an appointment to inspect comments. You may do so by calling
(202)874-5043. Upon arrival, visitors will be required to present valid government-issued photo identification and submit to security screening in order to inspect and photocopy comments. *Docket:* You may also view or request available background documents and project summaries using the methods described above. *Board:* You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. OP-1292, by any of the following methods: • Agency Web Site: *http://www.federalreserve.gov.* Follow the instructions for submitting comments at *http://www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/foia/ProposedRegs.cfm.* • *Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.* Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • *E-mail: regs.comments@federalreserve.gov.* Include the docket number in the subject line of the message. • *Fax:* 202/452-3819 or 202/452-3102. • *Mail:* Jennifer J. Johnson, Secretary, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20551. All public comments are available from the Board's Web site at *http://www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/foia/ProposedRegs.cfm* as submitted, unless modified for technical reasons. Accordingly, your comments will not be edited to remove any identifying or contact information. Public comments may also be viewed in electronic or paper form in Room MP-500 of the Board's Martin Building (20th and C Streets, NW.) between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. on weekdays. *FDIC:* You may submit comments by any of the following methods: • *Agency Web Site: http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/federal.* Follow instructions for submitting comments on the Agency Web Site. • *E-mail: Comments@FDIC.gov.* Include “Proposed Illustrations” in the subject line of the message. • *Mail:* Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary, Attention: Comments, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 550 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20429. • *Hand Delivery/Courier:* Guard station at the rear of the 550 17th Street Building (located on F Street) on business days between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m. (EST). • *Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.* Follow the instructions for submitting comments. *Public Inspection:* All comments received will be posted without change to *http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/federal* including any personal information provided. Comments may be inspected and photocopied in the FDIC Public Information Center, 3501 North Fairfax Drive, Room E-1002, Arlington, VA 22226, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.
(EST)on business days. Paper copies of public comments may be ordered from the Public Information Center by telephone at
(877)275-3342 or
(703)562-2200. *OTS:* You may submit comments, identified by ID OTS-2007-0016, by any of the following methods: • *E-mail:* *regs.comments@ots.treas.gov* . Please include ID OTS-2007-0016 in the subject line of the message and include your name and telephone number in the message. • *Fax:*
(202)906-6518. • *Mail:* Regulation Comments, Chief Counsel's Office, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552, Attention: ID OTS-2007-0016. • *Hand Delivery/Courier:* Guard's Desk, East Lobby Entrance, 1700 G Street, NW., from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. on business days. Address envelope as follows: Attention: Regulation Comments, Chief Counsel's Office, Attention: ID OTS-2007-0016. *Instructions:* All submissions received must include the agency name and docket number for this proposed Guidance. All comments received will be posted without change to the OTS Internet Site at *http://www.ots.treas.gov/pagehtml.cfm?catNumber=67&an=1* , including any personal information provided. *Docket:* For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to *http://www.ots.treas.gov/pagehtml.cfm?catNumber=67&an=1.* In addition, you may inspect comments at the Public Reading Room, 1700 G Street, NW., by appointment. To make an appointment for access, call
(202)906-5922, send an e-mail to *public.info@ots.treas.gov* , or send a facsimile transmission to
(202)906-7755. (Prior notice identifying the materials you will be requesting will assist us in serving you.) We schedule appointments on business days between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. In most cases, appointments will be available the next business day following the date we receive a request. *NCUA:* You may submit comments by any of the following methods: • *Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.* Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • *NCUA Web Site:* *http://www.ncua.gov/RegulationsOpinionsLaws/proposed_regs/proposed_regs.html* . Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • *E-mail:* Address to *regcomments@ncua.gov.* Include “[Your name] Comments on” in the e-mail subject line. • *Fax:*
(703)518-6319. Use the subject line described above for e-mail. • *Mail:* Address to Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314-3428. • *Hand Delivery/Courier:* Same as mail address. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: *OCC:* Michael S. Bylsma, Director, Stephen Van Meter, Assistant Director, or Kathryn D. Ray, Special Counsel, Community and Consumer Law Division,
(202)874-5750. *Board:* Kathleen C. Ryan, Counsel, or Jamie Z. Goodson, Attorney, Division of Consumer and Community Affairs,
(202)452-3667; or Kara Handzlik, Attorney, Legal Division,
(202)452-3852. For users of Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (“TDD”) only, contact
(202)263-4869. *FDIC:* Victoria M. Pawelski, Policy Analyst,
(202)898-3571, or Mira N. Marshall, Acting Chief, CRA/Fair Lending Section,
(202)898-3912, Compliance Policy & Exam Support Branch, Division of Supervision and Consumer Protection; or Richard B. Foley, Counsel, Legal Division,
(202)898-3784. *OTS:* Montrice G. Yakimov, Assistant Managing Director,
(202)906-6173 or Glenn Gimble, Senior Project Manager,
(202)906-7158, Compliance and Consumer Protection Division. *NCUA:* Cory W. Phariss, Program Officer, Examination and Insurance,
(703)518-6618. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background On March 8, 2007, the Agencies published for comment a proposed Statement on Subprime Mortgage Lending, 72 FR 10533 (Mar. 8, 2007) (proposed statement). The consumer protection portion of the proposed statement set forth recommended practices to ensure that consumers have clear and balanced information about the relative benefits and risks of certain adjustable rate mortgage
(ARM)products. The proposed statement specifically indicated that consumers should be informed about issues relating to potential payment shock—i.e., significant increases in monthly payments that may occur when the interest rate adjusts to a fully-indexed rate—as well as other features that may be present in these loans, including prepayment penalties, balloon payments, pricing premiums for reduced documentation loans, and the borrower's responsibility for real estate taxes and insurance if not escrowed. The Agencies revised the proposed statement based on the comments received, and recently published the final Statement on Subprime Mortgage Lending in the **Federal Register** (Subprime Statement). 72 FR 37569 (July 10, 2007). Like the Interagency Guidance on Nontraditional Mortgage Product Risks, 71 FR 58609 (Oct. 4, 2006), the Subprime Statement is applicable to all banks and their subsidiaries, bank holding companies and their nonbank subsidiaries, savings associations and their subsidiaries, savings and loan holding companies and their subsidiaries, and credit unions. The Subprime Statement, including the consumer protection portion, provides recommended practices to assist institutions in addressing particular risks and consumer protection concerns raised by certain ARM products typically offered to subprime borrowers. Some industry group commenters on the proposal asked the Agencies to provide uniform disclosures for these products, or to publish illustrations of the consumer information contemplated by the Subprime Statement similar to those previously proposed by the Agencies in connection with nontraditional mortgage products. 71 FR 58609 (Oct. 4, 2006). The Agencies recently published final Illustrations of Consumer Information for Nontraditional Mortgage Products. 72 FR 31825 (June 8, 2007). As was done with those illustrations, the Agencies believe that it would be desirable to seek public comment before issuing these illustrations in order to determine the types of illustrations that would be most useful to consumers and institutions. II. Proposed Illustrations The Agencies believe that illustrations of consumer information may be useful to institutions as they implement the consumer information recommendations of the Subprime Statement. The Agencies appreciate that some institutions, including community banks, may prefer not to incur the costs and other burdens of developing their own consumer information documents to address the issues raised in the Subprime Statement, and could benefit from illustrations like those below. Use of the proposed illustrations is entirely voluntary. Accordingly, there is no Agency requirement or expectation that institutions must use the illustrations in their communications with consumers. Institutions seeking to follow the recommendations set forth in the Subprime Statement could, at their option, elect to: • Use the illustrations; • Provide information based on the illustrations, but expand, abbreviate, or otherwise tailor any information in the illustrations as appropriate to reflect, for example: ○ the institution's product offerings, such as by deleting information about loan products and loan terms not offered by the institution and by revising the illustrations to reflect specific terms currently offered by the institution; ○ the consumer's particular loan requirements or qualifications; ○ current market conditions, such as by changing the loan amounts, interest rates, and corresponding payment amounts to reflect current local market circumstances; and ○ other material information relating to the loan consistent with the Subprime Statement; or • Provide the information described in the Subprime Statement, as appropriate, in an alternate format. Whether or not an institution chooses to use the proposed illustrations, the Subprime Statement provides that communications with consumers, including advertisements, oral statements, and promotional materials, should provide clear and balanced information about the relative benefits and risks of certain ARM products. Further, product descriptions and advertisements are to provide clear, detailed information about the costs, terms, features, and risks of the loan to the borrower. In particular, the Subprime Statement indicates that “[i]nformation provided to consumers should clearly explain the risk of payment shock and the ramifications of prepayment penalties, balloon payments, and the lack of escrow for taxes and insurance, as necessary.” 1 Consumers also should be informed about any pricing premium associated with a stated income or reduced documentation loan program. 1 72 FR at 37574. This recommended information could be presented as shown in the two illustrations set forth below. Illustration 1 is a narrative explanation of some of the key features of certain ARM loans that are identified in the Subprime Statement, including payment shock, responsibility for taxes and insurance, prepayment penalties, balloon payments, and increased costs associated with stated income or reduced documentation loans. The Subprime Statement indicates that information provided to consumers should clearly explain these features and their ramifications in a timely manner. Illustration 1 seeks to provide both the general and loan-specific information contemplated in the Subprime Statement in a format that could be used by creditors seeking to implement the consumer protection recommendations in the guidance. Creditors that use Illustration 1 should, of course, delete or modify the prepayment penalty or other language in the illustration in order to reflect the actual terms being offered. Illustration 1 is also intended to enable creditors to implement the Subprime Statement with minimal burden. Illustration 2 is a chart with numerical examples that is designed to show the potential consequences of payment shock in a concrete, readily understandable manner for a loan structured with a discounted interest rate for the first two years. Illustration 2 provides information on payments for an ARM loan, assuming caps on annual and aggregate interest rate increases based on typical terms in the market, 2 and information for a comparable fixed rate mortgage. 2 The ARM loan in Illustration 2 assumes a start rate of 7 percent, an initial index of 5.5 percent and a margin of 6 percent. It assumes annual payment adjustments after the initial discount period, a 3 percent cap on the interest rate increase at the end of year 2, and a 2 percent annual payment adjustment cap on interest rate increases thereafter, with a lifetime payment adjustment cap of 6 percent (or a maximum rate of 13 percent). It also assumes no change in the index through year 4. Creditors could satisfy the consumer information recommendations by simply photocopying the illustrations (after making any necessary deletions or modifications) and distributing them to consumers in a timely manner. In addition, once the Agencies adopt illustrations as final, to assist institutions that wish to use them, the Agencies will post them on their respective Web sites in a form that can be downloaded, modified as appropriate, and printed for easy reproduction. III. Request for Comment The Agencies request comment on all aspects of the proposed illustrations. We encourage specific comment on whether the illustrations, as proposed, would be useful to institutions, including community banks, seeking to implement the “Consumer Protection Principles” portion of the Subprime Statement, or whether changes should be made to them. We also encourage specific comment on the following: whether the illustrations, as proposed, would be useful in promoting consumer understanding of the risks and material terms of certain ARM products, as described in the Subprime Statement, or whether changes should be made to them. We also seek comment on whether the information in the proposed illustrations is set forth in a clear manner and format; whether these illustrations or a modified form should be adopted by the Agencies; and whether there are additional illustrations relating to certain ARM products that would be useful to consumers and institutions. The Agencies are aware that individual institutions and industry associations have developed and are likely to continue developing documents that can be effective in conveying critical information discussed in the “Consumer Protection Principles” portion of the Subprime Statement. These illustrations are not intended to dissuade institutions and associations from developing their own means of delivering important information about these products to consumers. In this regard, the Agencies note that they have not conducted any consumer testing to assess the effectiveness of any existing documents currently used by institutions, or of the proposed illustrations set forth below. Commenters are specifically invited to provide information on any consumer testing they have conducted in connection with comparable disclosures. EN14AU07.000 EN14AU07.001 Dated: August 2, 2007. John C. Dugan, Comptroller of the Currency. By order of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 2, 2007. Jennifer J. Johnson, Secretary of the Board. Dated at Washington, DC the 31st day of July, 2007. By order of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Valerie J. Best, Assistant Executive Secretary. Dated: August 7, 2007. By the Office of Thrift Supervision. John M. Reich, Director. Dated: August 3, 2007. By the National Credit Union Administration. JoAnn M. Johnson, Chairman. [OCC-4810-33-P 20%] [FRB-6210-01-P 20%] [FDIC-6714-01-P 20%] [OTS-6720-01-P 20%] [NCUA-7535-01-P 20%] [FR Doc. 07-3945 Filed 8-13-07; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 3
Citation graph
cites case law
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources