Notices. Notice of Intent to prepare a Program Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (PEIS/EIR) and Notice of Scoping Meetings

17,023 words·~77 min read·/register/2007/08/02/07-3785·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4310-40-M DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Reclamation San Joaquin River Restoration Program AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior. ACTION: Notice of Intent to prepare a Program Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (PEIS/EIR) and Notice of Scoping Meetings. SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act

(NEPA)and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) and the California Department of Water Resources

(DWR)propose to prepare a PEIS/EIR for the San Joaquin River Restoration Program (Program). The proposed Program is expected to be implemented by Reclamation, Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), the California Department of Fish and Game (DFG), and the DWR. DATES: Four scoping meetings will be held to solicit public input on alternatives, concerns, and issues to be addressed in the PEIS/EIR. The meeting dates are: • Tuesday, August 28, 2007, 6 p.m. to 8:30 p.m., Tulare, CA • Wednesday, August 29, 2007, 6 p.m. to 8:30 p.m., Fresno, CA • Thursday, August 30, 2007, 6 p.m. to 8:30 p.m., Los Banos, CA • Monday, September 10, 2007, 1:30 p.m. to 4 p.m., Sacramento, CA Written comments on the scope of the PEIS/EIR should be sent by September 21, 2007 to Ms. Margaret Gidding, Bureau of Reclamation, 2800 Cottage Way MP-140, Sacramento, CA 95825 or via e-mail at *mgidding@mp.usbr.gov* . ADDRESSES: The scoping meeting locations are: • International Agri-Center, Banquet Hall, 4450 S. Laspina St., Tulare, CA 93274 • Piccadilly Inn, University, Ballroom, 4961 North Cedar Ave., Fresno, CA 93726 • Merced County Fairgrounds, Germino Room, 403 F St., Los Banos, CA 93635 • Library Galleria, 828 I St., Sacramento, CA 95814 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Margaret Gidding at the above address, by telephone at 916-978-5104, TDD 916-978-5608 or via fax at 916-978-5114. Additional information is available online at *http://www.restoresjr.com* . If special assistance is required at one of the scoping meetings, please contact Ms. Margaret Gidding via the phone number or e-mail listed above no less than five working days prior to the meetings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Development of the PEIS/EIR for the Program is being carried out under Congressional authorization granted to the Secretary of the Interior under section 3406(c)(1) of the Central Valley Project Improvement Act (CVPIA) and will serve as the initial planning and environmental review activities necessary to implement the Settlement described below. In 1992, Congress passed the CVPIA (Pub. L. 102-575, Title XXXIV) in order to protect, restore, and enhance fish, wildlife, and associated habitats in California's Central Valley. Specifically, CVPIA Section 3406(c)(1) requires the Secretary of the Interior to “[d]evelop a comprehensive plan, which is reasonable, prudent, and feasible, to address fish, wildlife, and habitat concerns on the San Joaquin River, including but not limited to the streamflow, channel, riparian habitat, and water quality improvements that would be needed to reestablish where necessary and to sustain naturally reproducing anadromous fisheries from Friant Dam to its confluence with the San Francisco Bay/Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Estuary.” In 1988, a coalition of environmental groups, led by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), filed a lawsuit challenging the renewal of the long-term water service contracts between the United States and the Central Valley Project, Friant Division contractors. After more than 18 years of litigation of this lawsuit, known as the *Natural Resources Defense Council et al.* , v. *Rodgers, et al.* , a Settlement was reached. On September 13, 2006, the Settling Parties reached agreement on the terms and conditions of the Settlement which was subsequently approved by the Court on October 23, 2006. The “Settling Parties” include the NRDC, Friant Water Users Authority, and the Departments of the Interior and Commerce. The Settlement is based on two parallel goals: • To restore and maintain fish populations in “good condition” in the main stem of the San Joaquin River below Friant Dam to the confluence of the Merced River, including naturally reproducing and self-sustaining populations of salmon and other fish (Restoration Goal); and • To reduce or avoid adverse water supply impacts to all of the Friant Division long-term contractors that may result from the Interim Flows and Restoration Flows provided for in the Settlement (Water Management Goal). The Settlement states that the Secretary of the Interior will implement the terms and conditions of the Settlement. Additionally, the Settling Parties agreed that implementation of the Settlement will also require participation of the State of California (State). Therefore, concurrent with the execution of the Settlement, the Settling Parties entered into a Memorandum of Understanding

(MOU)with the State (by and through the California Resources Agency, DWR, DFG, and the California Environmental Protection Agency) regarding the State's role in the implementation of the Settlement. The “implementing agencies”, which include Reclamation, USFWS, NMFS, DWR, and DFG, are responsible for the management of the Program to implement the Settlement. Public Disclosure Before including your name, address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Dated: July 27, 2007. John F. Davis, Deputy Regional Director, Mid-Pacific Region. [FR Doc. E7-15029 Filed 8-1-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310-MN-P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Federal Bureau of Investigation [OMB Number 1110-0042] Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed New Collection; Comments Requested ACTION: 60-Day Notice of Information Collection Under Review: CJIS Customer Satisfaction Surveys The Department of Justice (DOJ), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Criminal Justice Information Services

(CJIS)Division will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget

(OMB)for review and clearance in accordance with review procedures of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for “sixty days” until [ - - ]. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. If you have comments, especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact Ashley K. Grove, IT Specialist, Federal Bureau of Investigation, CJIS Division, Module D3, 1000 Custer Hollow Road, Clarksburg, West Virginia 26306-0151, or facsimile at

(304)625-3457. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: —Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency/component, including whether the information will have practical utility; —Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies/components estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; —Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and —Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Overview of this Information Collection:

(1)*Type of Information Collection:* Revision of a previously approved collection.

(2)*Title of the Form/Collection:* CJIS Customer Satisfaction Surveys.

(3)*Agency Form Number, if any, and the applicable component of the department sponsoring the collection* : Form Number: 1-760, 1-761, 1-762, 1-763, 1-764, 1-765, 1-766, 1-770. Criminal Justice Information Services Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Justice.

(4)*Affected Public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract* : Primary: State, local or tribal governments. Other: Federal Government and business or other for-profit. Brief Abstract: The FBI established the CJIS Division to serve as the focal point and central repository for criminal justice information services within the FBI. The CJIS Division is responsible for the following programs administered by the FBI for the benefit of local, state, federal, and foreign criminal justice agencies: Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System; Law Enforcement Online; National Crime Information Center; National Instant Criminal Background Check System—Federal Firearm Licensees; National Instant Criminal Background Check System—Point of Contact and Partial Point of Contact States; Uniform Crime Reporting; Interstate Identification Index; and the CJIS Division Intelligence Group. CJIS will be conducting a customer service survey for each of the eight aforementioned programs. These surveys will be used to establish approval rating baselines of CJIS Division services in addition to identifying areas where our services can be improved or new services established to assist the criminal justice community with the performance of their official duties.

(5)*An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time estimated for an average respondent to respond* : Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System − Respondents = 400, Average Completion Time = 4 minutes; Law Enforcement Online − Respondents = 400, Average Completion Time = 2 minutes; National Crime Information Center − Respondents = 400, Average Completion Time = 3 minutes; National Instant Criminal Background Check System − Federal Firearm Licensees − Respondents = 400, Average Completion Time = 2 minutes; National Instant Criminal Background Check System − Point of Contact and Partial Point of Contact − Respondents = 21, Average Completion Time = 11 minutes; Uniform Crime Reporting − Respondents = 400, Average Completion Time = 3 minutes; Interstate Identification Index − Respondents = 400, Average Completion Time = 3 minutes; and the CJIS Division Intelligence Group − Respondents = 400, Average Completion Time = 3 minutes.

(6)*An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the collection* : There are an estimated 137 total public burden hours associated with this collection. If additional information is required contact: Ms. Lynn Bryant, Department Clearance Officer, Policy and Planning Staff, Justice Management Division, United States Department of Justice, Patrick Henry Building, Suite 1600, 601 D Street, NW., Washington, DC 20530. Dated: July 27,2007. Lynn Bryant, Department Clearance Officer, PRA, United States Department of Justice. [FR Doc. E7-14951 Filed 8-1-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-02-P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Office of Justice Programs [OMB Number 1121-NEW] Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comments Requested ACTION: 60-Day Notice of Information Collection Under Review: 2007 Census of Law Enforcement Aviation Units. The Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget

(OMB)for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for “sixty days” until October 1, 2007. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. If you have comments especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact Steven Smith, Bureau of Justice Statistics, 810 Seventh St., NW., Washington, DC 20531. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: —Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; —Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies' estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; —Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and —Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Overview of This Information Collection

(1)*Type of Information Collection:* Proposed Collection.

(2)*Title of the Form/Collection:* 2007 Census of Law Enforcement Aviation Units.

(3)*Agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the Department of Justice sponsoring the collection:* Not applicable.

(4)*Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract:* Primary: Federal, State, and Local Government. This information collection is a census of State and local law enforcement agency aviation units. The census will provide detailed statistics on the operations, personnel, expenditures, equipment, and other information about these important units.

(5)*An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time estimated for an average respondent to respond:* It is estimated that 250 respondents will complete a one-hour questionnaire.

(6)*An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the collection:* There are an estimated 250 total annual burden hours associated with this collection. If additional information is required contact: Lynn Bryant, Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Patrick Henry Building, Suite 1600, 601 D Street, NW., Washington, DC 20530. Dated: July 27, 2007. Lynn Bryant, Department Clearance Officer, Department of Justice. [FR Doc. E7-14949 Filed 8-1-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-18-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Investigations Regarding Certifications of Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (“the Act”) and are identified in the Appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to section 221(a) of the Act. The purpose of each of the investigations is to determine whether the workers are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title II, Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations will further relate, as appropriate, to the determination of the date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved. The petitioners or any other persons showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigations may request a public hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than August 13, 2007. Interested persons are invited to submit written comments regarding the subject matter of the investigations to the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than August 13, 2007. The petitions filed in this case are available for inspection at the Office of the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room C-5311, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. Signed at Washington, DC, this 24th day of July 2007. Richard Church, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. Appendix—TAA [petitions instituted between 7/16/07 and 7/20/07] TA-W Subject firm (petitioners) Location Date of institution Date of petition 61828 Freightliner

(Wkrs)Cleveland, NC 07/16/07 07/13/07 61829 Crane Plumbling LL (State) Dallas, TX 07/16/07 07/12/07 61830 Renfro-Charleston Hosiery

(Wkrs)Fort Payne, AL 07/16/07 07/16/07 61831 CVG-Global Truck Division, Seattle 031

(Comp)Seattle, WA 07/16/07 07/13/07 61832 Magnecomp Corporation

(Wkrs)Temecula, CA 07/16/07 07/10/07 61833 Chapin Watermatics, Inc.

(Wkrs)Watertown, NY 07/17/07 07/16/07 61834 Slinger Manufacturing Company (AFLCIO) Slinger, WI 07/17/07 07/16/07 61835 Caraustar Mill Group

(Comp)Sinking Spring, PA 07/18/07 07/18/07 61836 Hutchinson FTS Inc.

(Comp)Quincy, MI 07/18/07 07/17/07 61837 St. Paul Metalcraft (State) Arden Hills, MN 07/18/07 07/17/07 61838 Tyler Pipe

(USW)Tyler, TX 07/18/07 07/16/07 61839 AstenJohnson, Inc.

(Comp)Walterboro, SC 07/19/07 07/18/07 61840 Converse Industries, Inc.

(Wkrs)Kenosha, WI 07/19/07 07/18/07 61841 Kay Home Products

(Wkrs)Antioch, IL 07/19/07 07/18/07 61842 Seton Company

(Comp)Saxton, PA 07/20/07 07/19/07 61843 Kraft Foods Global, Inc

(Comp)Rochelle, IL 07/20/07 07/19/07 61844 Carter-Pertaine Inc. (State) Houston, TX 07/20/07 07/13/07 61845 NYC American, Inc.

(Wkrs)Brooklyn, NY 07/20/07 07/19/07 61846 Tingstol

(Wkrs)Elk Grove Village, IL 07/20/07 07/03/07 61847 Cedar Ideas

(Comp)Oakfield, ME 07/20/07 07/19/07 61848 Kentucky Derby Hosiery/Gildan—Plant 4 and Fowler Rd.

(Comp)Mt Airy, NC 07/20/07 07/18/07 61849 Ada Gage

(Comp)Ada, MI 07/20/07 07/19/07 61850 Southern Loom Reed

(Comp)Gaffney, SC 07/20/07 07/13/07 61851 Bosch Security System

(IBEW)Lancaster, PA 07/20/07 07/19/07 61852 Schnadig Corporation

(Comp)Montoursville, PA 07/20/07 07/12/07 [FR Doc. E7-14996 Filed 8-1-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-58,984] Independent Steel Castings Company, New Buffalo, MI; Notice of Revised Determination of Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on Remand On July 10, 2007, the U.S. Court of International Trade (USCIT) remanded to the U.S. Department of Labor (Department) *Former Employees of Independent Steel Castings Company, Inc.* v. *United States Department of Labor,* Court No. 06-00338. In its order, the USCIT directed the Department to acquire additional information on criterion two of the Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

(ATAA)program (whether the adversely affected workers in the petitioning workers' firm possess job skills that are not easily transferable to other employment). The Department's determination regarding the subject workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance

(TAA)and ineligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

(ATAA)was issued on June 16, 2006. The Department's Notice of determination was published in the **Federal Register** on July 14, 2006 (71 FR 40157). The determination stated that of the three criteria used to assess eligibility for ATAA —(1) Significant number of adversely affected workers age 50 or over;

(2)whether workers possess skills that are easily transferable; and

(3)whether competitive conditions within the workers' industry are adverse—workers at the subject firm had not satisfied the second criterion because they possessed skills that were easily transferable. The subject workers had been engaged in the production of investment castings (i.e. steel, aluminum and bronze castings). The subject firm closed May 2005. The petitioner, the International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW), requested administrative reconsideration of the negative ATAA determination. The request alleged that the county in which the subject firm is located “has not seen any significant employment growth in the last four years” and has a high unemployment rate. By a letter dated July 31, 2006, the Department denied the request for reconsideration, stating that the UAW had not presented evidence that the Department had erred in its interpretation of facts or of the law. The letter also outlined the Department's ATAA investigation methodology—Training and Employment Guidance Letter No. 2-03 (TEGL 2-03)—and stated that the UAW's allegations were insufficient to satisfy ATAA criterion two (whether workers possess skills that are easily transferable). In the complaint, the Plaintiffs alleged that the separated workers did not possess skills that are easily transferable; that the Department “relied on conclusory assertions” provided by the subject firm “while ignoring evidence presented by the Union;” and that the Department “relied on unverified information” provided by the subject firm official. While the USCIT upheld the Department's position that it was reasonable for the Department to rely on information provided by a knowledgeable subject firm official, the USCIT found that the Department's conclusion on ATAA criterion two was not supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, the USCIT remanded the matter to the Department for further investigation and a redetermination of the subject workers' ATAA eligibility. During the remand investigation, the Department contacted the Plaintiffs' counsel to obtain the position descriptions and lists of skill sets of each of the separated workers. The Department also attempted to contact the subject firm official who provided the Department information during the initial investigation to obtain more information regarding the workers' skills and the skills required to gain new employment in the New Buffalo, Michigan local commuting area. In addition, the Department surveyed companies in the New Buffalo, Michigan local commuting area to determine whether their jobs required the same skills as those which the subject workers possessed. As a result of the remand investigation, the Department finds that workers at the subject firm do not possess skills that are easily transferable. Accordingly, the workers have satisfied criterion two. Further, the Department finds that at least five percent of the workforce at the subject firm is at least fifty years of age and that competitive conditions within the industry are adverse. Therefore, the Department has concluded that all three ATAA criteria have been met. Conclusion After careful review of the additional facts obtained on remand, I conclude that the requirements of section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, have been met for workers at the subject firm. In accordance with the provisions of the Act, I make the following certification: “All workers of Independent Steel Castings Company, New Buffalo, Michigan, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after March 2, 2005 through June 16, 2008 are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.” Signed in Washington, DC, this 19th day of July, 2007. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7-14998 Filed 8-1-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-59,168] Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance; Joan Fabrics Corporation Including Workers Who's Wages Were Paid By Accuforce Staffing Service; Siler City, North Carolina In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1074 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on April 25, 2006, applicable to workers of Joan Fabrics Corporation, Siler City, North Carolina. The notice was published in the **Federal Register** on May 11, 2006 (71 FR 27519). At the request of a company official, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers were engaged in the production of upholstery, wall panel and tie lining fabrics. New information shows that following a change in ownership, some workers of the Siler City, North Carolina location of the subject firm will become employees of AccuForce Staffing Service. Workers separated from employment at the Siler City, North Carolina location of the subject firm had their wages reported under a separate unemployment insurance

(UI)tax account for AccuForce Staffing Service. Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to properly reflect this matter. The intent of the Department's certification is to include all workers of Joan Fabrics Corporation, including workers who's wages were paid by AccuForce Staffing Service, Siler City, North Carolina who were adversely affected by a shift in production to Mexico. The amended notice applicable to TA-W-59,168 is hereby issued as follows: “All workers of Joan Fabrics Corporation, including workers who's wages were paid by AccuForce Staffing Service, Siler City, North Carolina, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after April 5, 2005, through April 25, 2008, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.” Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of July 2007. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7-14995 Filed 8-1-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-57,746B] Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance; Joan Fabrics Corporation Mastercraft Fabrics, LLC.; Oakland Plant Including Workers Who's Wages Were Paid By Accuforce Staffing Service; Spindale, NC In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1074 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on September 27, 2005, applicable to workers of Joan Fabrics Corporation, Mastercraft Fabrics, LLC., Oakland Plant, Spindale, North Carolina. The notice was published in the **Federal Register** on October 31, 2005 (70 FR 72347). The certification was previously amended on November 23, 2005 to correct the impact date. The notice was published in the **Federal Register** on December 8, 2005 (70 FR 73033) At the request of a company official, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers were engaged in the production of jacquard furniture fabric. New information shows that following a change in ownership, some workers of the Oakland Plant, Spindale, North Carolina location of the subject firm will become employees of AccuForce Staffing Service. Workers separated from employment at the Oakland Plant, Spindale, North Carolina location of the subject firm had their wages reported under a separate unemployment insurance

(UI)tax account for Valdese Weavers. Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to properly reflect this matter. The intent of the Department's certification is to include all workers of Circa 1801 Doblin, a subsidiary of Joan Fabrics Corporation, EBM Textiles, LLC Division, now known as Valdese Weavers, who were adversely affected by increased customer imports. The amended notice applicable to TA-W-61,313 is hereby issued as follows: “All workers of Circa 1801 Doblin, a subsidiary of Joan Fabrics Corporation, EBM Textiles, LLC Division, now known as Valdese Weavers, Connelly Springs, North Carolina, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after April 13, 2006, through May 23, 2009, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.” Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of July, 2007. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7-15006 Filed 8-1-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-60,870] Lear Corporation, Now Known as International Automotive Components Group, Interior Systems Division, Sidney, OH; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on March 15, 2007, applicable to workers of Lear Corporation, Interior Systems Division, Sidney, Ohio. The notice was published in the **Federal Register** on March 30, 2007 (72 FR 15168). At the request of a company official, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in the production of automotive carpeting (for full floor, deck lids, cargo panels and trunks). New information shows that following a merger on April 1, 2007, Lear Corporation, is now known as International Automotive Components Group (IAC). Workers separated from employment at the subject firm had their wages reported under a separate unemployment insurance

(UI)tax account for International Automotive Components Group (IAC), Interior Systems Division. Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to properly reflect this matter. The intent of the Department's certification is to include all workers of Lear Corporation, Interior Systems Division, now known as International Automotive Components Group (IAC), Interior Systems Division who were adversely affected by increased imports. The amended notice applicable to TA-W-60,870 is hereby issued as follows: “All workers of Lear Corporation, Interior Systems Division, now known as International Automotive Components Group (IAC), Interior Systems Division, Sidney, Ohio, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after January 25, 2006, through March 15, 2009, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.” Signed at Washington, DC, this 24th day of July, 2007. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7-15004 Filed 8-1-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-60,851] Mastercraft Fabrics, LLC, Joan Fabrics Corporation, Eagle Mountain Finishing, Including Workers Who's Wages Were Paid by Accuforce Staffing Service Cramerton, NC; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and section 246 of the Trade Act of 1074 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on March 9, 2007, applicable to workers of Mastercraft Fabrics, LLC, Joan Fabrics Corporation, Eagle Mountain Finishing, Cramerton, North Carolina. The notice was published in the **Federal Register** on March 22, 2007 (72 FR 13528). At the request of a company official, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers were engaged in the production of finished fabrics. New information shows that following a change in ownership, some workers of the Eagle Mountain Finishing facility of the subject firm will become employees of AccuForce Staffing Service. Workers separated from employment at Eagle Mountain Finishing, Cramerton, North Carolina location of the subject firm had their wages reported under a separate unemployment insurance

(UI)tax account for AccuForce Staffing Service. Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to properly reflect this matter. The intent of the Department's certification is to include all workers of Mastercraft Fabrics, LLC, Joan Fabrics Corporation, Eagle Mountain Finishing, including workers whose wages were paid by AccuForce Staffing Service who were adversely affected by customer imports. The amended notice applicable to TA-W-60,851 is hereby issued as follows: “All workers of Mastercraft Fabrics LLC, Joan Fabrics Corporation, Eagle Mountain Finishing, including workers who's wages were paid by AccuForce Staffing Service, Cramerton, North Carolina, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after January 29, 2007, through March 9, 2009, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.” Signed at Washington, DC this 26th day of July, 2007. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7-15003 Filed 8-1-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-60,515] Maytag Corporation, A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Whirlpool Corporation, Newton Division; Including On-Site Leased Workers of Henkel Corp., Randstad Corp., Ryerson Steel, Chem-Tool, Barnes Electric, Mid Iowa Tools, Kimco Janitorial, Johnson Controls, and Baker Electric Newton, IA; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on December 26, 2006, applicable to workers of Maytag Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Whirlpool Corporation, Newton Division, Newton, Iowa. The notice was published in the **Federal Register** on January 16, 2007 (72 FR 1770). At the request of a company official, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in the production of laundry products (clothes washers and dryers) and are not separately identifiable by specific product. New information shows that leased workers of the above listed firms were contracted to work on-site at the Newton, Iowa location of Maytag Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Whirlpool Corporation, Newton Division. These workers provided a variety of functions in support of the production of laundry equipment (clothes washers and dryers) manufactured at the subject firm. The Department has determined that the above listed on-site worker groups are sufficiently under the control of Maytag Corporation to be considered leased workers. The intent of the Department's certification is to include all workers employed at Maytag Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Whirlpool Corporation, Newton Division, Newton, Iowa who were adversely affected by increased company imports. The amended notice applicable to TA-W-60,515 is hereby issued as follows: “All workers of Maytag Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Whirlpool Corporation, Newton Division, including on-site leased workers of Henkel Corp., Randstad Corp., Ryerson Steel, Chem-Tool, Barnes Electric, Mid Iowa Tools, Kimco Janitorial, Johnston Controls, and Baker Electric, Newton, Iowa, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after December 24, 2006, through December 26, 2008, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.” Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of July, 2007. Richard Church, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7-15002 Filed 8-1-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-59,909] McCormick and Co., Inc., CPD—Salinas Plant, Including On-Site Leased Workers of Spherion Staffing Group, Salinas, CA; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on August 31, 2006, applicable to workers of McCormick and Co., Inc., CPD—Salinas Plant, Salinas, California. The notice was published in the **Federal Register** on September 21, 2006 (71 FR 55216). At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers were engaged in the production of spices. New information shows that leased workers of Spherion Staffing Group were employed on-site at the Salinas, California location of McCormick and Co., Inc., CPD—Salinas Plant. The Department has determined that the Spherion Staffing Group workers were sufficiently under the control of McCormick and Co., Inc. to be considered leased workers. Based on these findings, the Department is amending this certification to include leased workers of Spherion Staffing Group working on-site at the Salinas, California location of the subject firm. The intent of the Department's certification is to include all workers employed at McCormick and Co., Inc., CPD—Salinas Plant, including on-site leased workers of Spherion Staffing Group, Salinas, California who were adversely affected by a shift in production to Canada. The amended notice applicable to TA-W-59,909 is hereby issued as follows: ”All workers of McCormick and Co., Inc., CPD—Salinas Plant, including on-site leased workers of Spherion Staffing Group, Salinas, California, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after August 14, 2005 through August 31, 2008, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.” Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of July, 2007. Richard Church, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7-15000 Filed 8-1-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers (TA-W) number and alternative trade adjustment assistance

(ATAA)by (TA-W) number issued during the period of July 16 through July 20, 2007. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Section (a)(2)(A) All of the Following Must Be Satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision have decreased absolutely; and C. Increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or II. Section (a)(2)(B) Both of the Following Must Be Satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. there has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or subdivision; and C. One of the Following Must Be Satisfied: 1. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United States; 2. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act; or 3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are or were produced by such firm or subdivision. Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made for secondarily affected workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of section 222(b) of the Act must be met.

(1)Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers' firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated;

(2)The workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related to the article that was the basis for such certification; and

(3)Either—

(A)The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph

(2)accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or

(B)A loss or business by the workers' firm with the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph

(2)contributed importantly to the workers' separation or threat of separation. In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

(ATAA)for older workers, the group eligibility requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met. 1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are 50 years of age or older. 2. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are not easily transferable. 3. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry (i.e., conditions within the industry are adverse). Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met. *TA-W-61,625; Performance Machine, La Palma, CA: June 6, 2006* . *TA-W-61,803; Rima Manufacturing Company, Piston Division, Hudson, MI: June 14, 2006.* *TA-W-61,608; Personnel Management, Inc., Diverisco, Working at Toyota Motor, Princeton, IN: May 29, 2006.* The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the Trade Act have been met. *NONE* . The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met. *NONE.* The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act have been met. *NONE* . Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. *TA-W-61,753; WestPoint Home Inc., Bath Products Divisions, Wagram, NC: August 11, 2007.* *TA-W-61,806; Laufen International, Inc., Canton Distribution Center, Canton, OH: July 9, 2006.* *TA-W-61,554; SemiTool Incorporated, LC Staffing, Express Personnel, Workplace, Inc., Kalispell, MT: May 18, 2006.* *TA-W-61,554A; SemiTool Incorporated—Birch Grove Site, Birch Grove Site, LC Staff, Express Personnel, Kalispell, MT: May 18, 2006.* *TA-W-61,554B; SemiTool Incorporated—Libby Plant, Libby Plant, Kalispell, MT: May 18, 2006.* *TA-W-61,638; Belcher Corporation LLC, South Easton, MA: May 25, 2006.* *TA-W-61,575; Herzman and Company, Inc., Lebanon, PA: May 17, 2006.* The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. *TA-W-61,779; Siemens Power Transmission and Distribution, Distribution Products Division, Wendell, NC: June 29, 2006.* *TA-W-61,780; Harman Becker Automotive Systems, Inc., Martinsville, IN: June 28, 2006.* *TA-W-61,791; Mahe Engine Components, Division of Mahle Industries, Inc., Franklin, KY: July 3, 2006.* *TA-W-61,796; Greatbatch Hittman, Inc., Medical Solutions Div., Superior, Swift, Kelly, Anchor, Columbia, MD: June 29, 2006.* *TA-W-61,576; Paper Magic Group, Inc., Scranton, PA: May 17, 2006.* *TA-W-61,576A; Paper Magic Group, Inc., Scranton, PA: May 17, 2006.* *TA-W-61,576B; Paper Magic Group, Inc., Troy, PA: May 17, 2006.* *TA-W-61,775; Tandy Brands Accessories, Yoakum, TX: June 28, 2006.* *TA-W-61,816; L. Hardy Company, Worcester, MA: July 5, 2006.* The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) and section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. *TA-W-61,746; Carolina Warp Print, Inc., Gastonia, NC: June 26, 2006.* The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) and section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. *NONE.* Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, it has been determined that the requirements of 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for the reasons specified. The Department has determined that criterion

(1)of section 246 has not been met. The firm does not have a significant number of workers 50 years of age or older. *TA-W-61,625; Performance Machine, La Palma, CA.* *TA-W-61,803; Rima Manufacturing Company, Piston Division, Hudson, MI.* *TA-W-61,608; Personnel Management, Inc., Diverisco, Working at Toyota Motor, Princeton, IN.* The Department has determined that criterion

(2)of section 246 has not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily transferable. *NONE.* The Department has determined that criterion

(3)of section 246 has not been met. Competition conditions within the workers' industry are not adverse. *NONE.* Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified. Because the workers of the firm are not eligible to apply for TAA, the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA. The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.) (employment decline) have not been met. *TA-W-61,666; Furnlite Inc., Fallston, NC.* *TA-W-61,703; Image Screens Inc., Paterson, NJ.* *TA-W-61,754; IBM Corporation, Manpower, Inc. and CTG, Rochester, MN.* The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met. *TA-W-61,797; Arrow Interventional, Subsidiary of Arrow International, Everett, MA.* The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met. *TA-W-61,635; Sunset Manufacturing Company, Tualatin, OR.* *TA-W-61,677; Needle Nacks Ltd., Madison, NC.* *TA-W-61,689; Johnson Controls, Inc., Oberlin, OH.* *TA-W-61,647; Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation, Teterboro, NJ.* *TA-W-61,696; Medtronic, Inc., Cardiovascular Division, Santa Rosa, CA.* The workers' firm does not produce an article as required for certification under section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974. *TA-W-61,787; National City Mortgage Corp., Final Documents Control Post Closing Dept., Miamisburg, OH.* The investigation revealed that criteria of section 222(b)(2) has not been met. The workers' firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier to or a downstream producer for a firm whose workers were certified eligible to apply for TAA. *NONE.* I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of July 16 through July 20, 2007. Copies of these determinations are available for inspection in Room C-5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 during normal business hours or will be mailed to persons who write to the above address. Dated: July 20, 2007. Richard Church, Certify Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7-15007 Filed 8-1-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-61,157; TA-W-61,157A] Visteon Systems, LLC, Climate Control Division Evaporators, Connersville, IN; Visteon Systems, LLC, Climate Control Division, Radiator/Heat Exchange, Connersville, IN; Including On-Site Leased Workers From CDI-IT Services and Synova, Employed Through IBM Corporation, Securitas Security Services USA, Inc., Premier MFG. Services, Kleenaway Services, Waste Management Upstream, PMI, Inc., Coolant Controls, Pitney Bowes and CNC Logistics; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on April 23, 2007, applicable to workers of Visteon Systems, LLC, Climate Control Division, Evaporators, Connersville, Indiana and Visteon Systems, LLC Climate Control Division Radiator/Heat Exchange, Connersville, Indiana. The notice was published in the **Federal Register** on May 9, 2007 (72 FR 26424). At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in the production of evaporators and radiators/heat exchanges for the automotive industry. The investigation revealed that the leased workers of the above listed firms were contracted to work on-site at the Connersville, Indiana location of Visteon Systems, LLC Climate Control Division. These workers provided a variety of functions supporting the production of evaporators and radiator/heat exchange units manufactured at the subject firm. The Department has determined that the above listed on-site worker groups are in support of the production of evaporators and radiator/heat exchange units at the subject firm and are sufficiently under the control of the subject firm. Since the workers of Visteon Systems, LLC, Climate Control Division, Evaporators and Radiator/Heat Exchange, Connersville, Indiana are certified eligible to apply for ATAA, the Department is extending that eligibility to the employees of the above listed firms working on-site at the subject firm. The intent of the Department's certification is to include all workers employed at Visteon Systems, LLC, Climate Control Division, Evaporators and Radiator/Heat Exchange, Connersville, Indiana who were adversely affected by a shift in production to Mexico. The amended notice applicable to TA-W-61,157 is hereby issued as follows: “Workers of Visteon Systems, LLC, Climate Control Division, Evaporators, Connersville, Indiana (TA-W-61,157) and Visteon Systems, LLC Climate Control Division, Radiator/Heat Exchange, Connersville, Indiana (TA-W-61,157A), including on-site leased workers from CDI-IT Services and Synova, employed through IBM Corporation, Securitas Security Services USA, Inc., Premier Mfg. Services, KleenAway Services, Waste Management Upstream, PMI, Inc., Pitney Bowes and CNC Logistics, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after March 19, 2006 through April 23, 2009, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.” Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of July, 2007. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7-15005 Filed 8-1-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-61,813] Wyeth Pharmaceuticals; Rouses Point, NY; Notice of Termination of Investigation Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on July 11, 2007 in response to a worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Rouses Point, New York. The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of July, 2007. Richard Church, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7-14999 Filed 8-1-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Labor Certification for the Permanent Employment of Aliens in the United States; Establishment of E-Mail Address for Receipt of Reports of Potential Non-Compliance AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Labor. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Department of Labor (DOL or Department) is publishing an e-mail address for the receipt and processing of reports of potential violations of its recently published Final Rule seeking to protect the integrity of the permanent labor certification program and reduce incentives for fraud and abuse. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William L. Carlson, Administrator, Office of Foreign Labor Certification, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone

(202)693-3010 (this is not a toll-free number). Individuals with hearing or speech impairments may access the telephone number above via TTY by calling the toll-free Federal Information Relay Service at

(800)877-8339. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 17, 2007, the Department published a Final Rule to protect the integrity of the permanent labor certification program, to reduce the incentives and opportunities for fraud, and to further fulfill the Department's statutory obligation to protect the wages and working conditions of U.S. workers. 72 FR 27904 (May 17, 2007). As part of that Rule, the Department informed the public it was considering the establishment of a toll-free telephone number, or development of other means, to receive reports on potential non-compliance with the Final Rule's provisions. The Department continues its consideration of a toll-free number, and has determined that as an initial matter, employers, foreign workers, U.S. workers, and others who wish to submit information on potential violations may do so through an e-mail box: *laborcert.fraud@dol.gov.* This box will be monitored for reports of alleged non-compliance with the regulations governing the permanent labor certification program. The Employment and Training Administration will determine an appropriate course of action for each report, and may refer individual inquiries to DOL's Employment Standards Administration, the DOL Office of Inspector General, the Department of Homeland Security, and/or other authorities. If appropriate, DOL may determine that no response is required. Signed at Washington, DC, this 30 day of July, 2007. Emily Stover Derocco, Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training Administration. [FR Doc. E7-14989 Filed 8-1-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-FP-P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 50-390] Tennessee Valley Authority; Notice of Withdrawal of Application for Amendment to Facility Operating License The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has granted the request of the Tennessee Valley Authority (the licensee) to withdraw its May 8, 2006, application for proposed amendment to Facility Operating License No. NPF-90 for the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit No. 1, located in Rhea County, Tennessee. The proposed amendment would have revised the Technical Specifications to increase the temperature limit of the ultimate heat sink. The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment published in the **Federal Register** on May 23, 2006 (71 FR 29681). However, by letter dated July 20, 2007, the licensee withdrew the proposed change. For further details with respect to this action, see the application for amendment dated May 8, 2006, and the licensee's letter dated July 20, 2007, which withdrew the application for license amendment. Documents may be examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR), located at One White Flint North, Public File Area O1 F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland. Publicly available records will be accessible electronically from the Agency-wide Documents Access and Management Systems (ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading Room on the internet at the NRC Web site, *http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html* . Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR Reference staff by telephone at 1-800-397-4209, or 301-415-4737 or by e-mail to *pdr@nrc.gov* . Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 26th day of July 2007. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Brendan T. Moroney, Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch II-2, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. E7-15047 Filed 8-1-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [EA-06-266, 06-278] In the Matter of University of Pittsburgh; Confirmatory Order (Effective Immediately) I University of Pittsburgh (UPitt or licensee) is the holder of Byproduct Material License 37-00245-09 issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) pursuant to 10 CFR Part 30. License No. 37-00245-09 was originally issued on February 5, 1987, and is due to expire on May 31, 2015. II On March 10, 2005, and March 23, 2006, the NRC Office of Investigations

(OI)initiated investigations (OI Case Nos. 1-2005-008 and 1-2006-023) to determine whether UPitt willfully violated the physical presence requirements on March 4, 2005, and whether a neurosurgeon had willfully entered the authorized user's

(AU)initials on written directives without the AU's knowledge or consent. The investigations were completed on June 15, 2006 and October 10, 2006. Based on a March 5, 2005, visit to the UPitt Medical Center Gamma Knife facility and the investigations, the NRC informed UPitt, in a letter dated February 27, 2007, that three apparent violations were being considered for escalated enforcement action in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy. To address the three apparent violations, the February 27, 2007, letter offered UPitt a choice to

(1)Attend a Predecisional Enforcement Conference (PEC), or

(2)request Alternative Dispute Resolution

(ADR)with the NRC in an attempt to resolve any disagreement on whether a violation occurred, the appropriate enforcement action, and the appropriate corrective actions. III Subsequent to the NRC's identification of the apparent violations, UPitt took several actions to assure that these events would not recur. These actions included:

(1)Ensuring that an Authorized Medical Physicist

(AMP)and an AU are present during each GSR treatment;

(2)issuance of a procedure for physical presence requirements and posting it at each GSR unit; and,

(3)hiring another AMP. Also, in response to the NRC's February 27, 2007 letter, UPitt requested the use of ADR to resolve the apparent violations and pending enforcement action. ADR is a process in which a neutral mediator, with no decision-making authority, assists the NRC and UPitt to resolve any disagreements on whether a violation occurred, the appropriate enforcement action, and the appropriate corrective actions. At UPitt's request, an ADR session was held in the Region I Office in King of Prussia, PA on May 17, 2007, between UPitt and the NRC. This ADR session was mediated by a professional mediator, arranged through Cornell University's Institute of Conflict Management. Based on the discussion during the ADR session, a settlement agreement was reached regarding this matter. The elements of the settlement agreement are as follows: 1. As noted in an NRC letter dated February 27, 2007, based on an NRC inspection and NRC investigations, the NRC identified three apparent violations of NRC requirements at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Gamma Knife facility. The first apparent violation, which involved a failure to meet physical presence requirements described in 10 CFR 35.615(f)(3), included three examples, two of which involved willfulness. The examples included:

(1)A March 4, 2005, failure to meet physical presence requirements in that a GSR treatment was conducted without the continuous physical presence of an AMP;

(2)multiple incidents between May 13, 2004 and March 10, 2005, when two neurosurgeons, in careless disregard of NRC regulations, initiated GSR treatments in separate suites with only one AMP available to meet physical presence requirements; and,

(3)a February 22, 2005, incident when one neurosurgeon willfully initiated a treatment without a written directive signed by an AU and without the physical presence of an AU. The second apparent violation involved licensee management's failure to ensure that GSR activities met NRC requirements, as required by 10 CFR 35.24(b). The third apparent violation involved multiple occasions when a neurosurgeon recorded the Radiation Therapist's initials on the GSR written directive, causing the licensee to violate 10 CFR 35.32. In the NRC February 27, 2007 letter, the NRC noted that it had not determined that violations had occurred or that enforcement should be taken, and the NRC offered the licensee an opportunity to attend a PEC prior to making an enforcement decision. In the alternative, the NRC offered the licensee the opportunity to attend an ADR mediation session to resolve these matters. 2. As a result of an ADR mediation session conducted on May 17, 2007, the licensee and the NRC agreed to final disposition of this matter by way of a single violation of the regulatory requirements in 10 CFR 35.24(b). Specifically, the licensee through the Radiation Safety Officer:

(a)Failed to ensure from May 13, 2004 through March 10, 2005, the physical presence requirements of 10 CFR 35.615(f)(3) were consistently met; and

(b)failed to ensure between 1998 and 2000 that written directives were consistently signed by all three members of the Gamma Knife team prior to administration of GSR treatments in accordance with 10 CFR 35.32. The NRC concluded that certain aspects of the 10 CFR 35.24(b) violation were willful. The licensee disputed this conclusion. The NRC and the licensee have agreed to disagree regarding any willful aspects of this violation. 3. Prior to the ADR mediation session, the licensee described the actions that it had taken to address the apparent violations identified by the NRC. Those actions included:

(1)Ensuring that an AMP and an AU are present during each GSR treatment;

(2)issuance of a procedure for physical presence requirements and posting it at each GSR unit; and,

(3)hiring another AMP. Some of these actions were verified by the NRC during the following:

(1)An on-site inspection on March 15-17, 2005;

(2)the NRC's review of the UPitt response to a Confirmatory Action Letter (CAL), dated April 28, 2005;

(3)an on-site inspection on May 12, 2005 to follow-up on the CAL; and,

(4)a routine inspection performed September 25-29, 2006. 4. During the ADR mediation session, the licensee also described additional corrective actions that it had taken or planned, which includes:

(1)Having the RSO initiate a requirement for a physical presence log to be maintained at each gamma knife treatment console, to include patient name, AU physically present, AMP physically present, date, and start/stop time of treatment;

(2)having the RSO staff provide annual radiation safety training to the gamma knife staff, including a review of all applicable requirements in 10 CFR Parts 19, 20, and 35, with emphasis on the physical presence and written directive requirements;

(3)having an outside independent consultant (medical RSO) conduct an audit of the Radiation Safety Program with special emphasis on the gamma knife program and management oversight;

(4)increasing surveillance of GSR treatments by RSO staff; and,

(5)developing a program to heighten awareness of the need to report concerns, and including this program in initial and refresher training for all radiation workers, to foster an environment for raising safety concerns. 5. To provide further opportunity for other licensees in the industry to learn from this incident, UPitt also agreed to:

(1)Enhance its 40 hour GSR training course provided to users at other facilities throughout the United States, including expanding the lecture on NRC regulatory requirements to include the physical presence requirements, including a description of this experience as part of the training; and,

(2)submit a lessons-learned article for the Operational Radiation Safety publication and the Elekta Newsletter, *eWavelength* , describing these occurrences. The licensee will provide a copy of the training syllabus before conducting the training, and a copy of the article to the NRC at least 30 days prior to the submittal of the article to the organization. 6. In light of the actions that the licensee has taken, or committed to take, as described in Items 3-5 above, as well as the fact that the violation did not result in any known safety consequences to patients, workers, or the public, the NRC agrees to issue a Notice of Violation without a civil penalty for the violation as characterized in Item 2 and to classify the violation at Severity Level III. This action will be publically available in ADAMS and on the NRC “Significant Enforcement Actions” Web site. 7. The licensee also agreed to issuance of a Confirmatory Order confirming this agreement. IV In light of the actions UPitt has taken and agreed to take to correct the violations and prevent recurrence, as set forth in Section III above, the NRC has concluded that its concerns can be resolved through implementation of UPitt's commitments as outlined in this Confirmatory Order. The NRC has also determined that these commitments shall be confirmed by this Confirmatory Order. Based on the above and UPitt's consent, this Confirmatory Order is immediately effective upon issuance. V Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 81, 161b, 161i, 161o, 182, and 186 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission's regulations in 10 CFR Part 2.202 and 10 CFR Part 30 and 35, it is hereby ordered, that within one year of the date of this order: 1. UPitt will enhance its 40 hour GSR training course provided to users at other facilities throughout the United States, including expanding the lecture on NRC regulatory requirements to include the physical presence requirements, including a description of this experience as part of the training; 2. UPitt will provide the NRC a copy of the training syllabus before conducting the training; 3. UPitt will submit a lessons-learned article for the Operational Radiation Safety publication and the Elekta Newsletter, *eWavelength* , describing these occurrences; 4. UPitt will provide a copy of the article to the NRC at least 30 days prior to the submission of the article to the organization; and 5. UPitt will send a letter to the NRC informing the NRC that the actions in Sections V.1-4 are complete, and UPitt will send the letter within 30 days of completion of all of these actions. The NRC Region I Regional Administrator may relax or rescind, in writing, any of the above conditions upon a showing by UPitt of good cause. VI Any person adversely affected by this Confirmatory Order, other than UPitt, may request a hearing within 20 days of its issuance. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the time to request a hearing. A request for extension of time must be made in writing to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, and must include a statement of good cause for the extension. Any request for a hearing shall be submitted to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Chief, Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff, Washington, DC 20555. Copies of the hearing request shall also be sent to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC 20555, to the Assistant General Counsel for Materials Litigation and Enforcement, to the Director of the Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs at the same address, to the NRC Region I office at 475 Allendale Rd., King of Prussia, PA 19406, and to UPitt. Because of potential disruptions in delivery of mail to United States Government offices, it is requested that answers and requests for hearing be transmitted to the Secretary of the Commission either by means of facsimile transmission to 301-415-1101 or by e-mail to *hearingdocket@nrc.gov* and also to the Office of the General Counsel by means of facsimile transmission to 301-415-3725 or e-mail to *OGCMailCenter@nrc.gov* . If such a person requests a hearing, that person shall set forth with particularity the manner in which his interest is adversely affected by this Order, and shall address the criteria set forth in 10 CFR Part 2.309(d) and (f). If a hearing is requested by a person whose interest is adversely affected, the Commission will issue an Order designating the time and place of any hearing. If a hearing is held, the issue to be considered at such hearing shall be whether this Confirmatory Order shall be sustained. An answer or a request for a hearing shall not stay the immediate effectiveness of this order. Dated this 23th day of July 2007. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Marc L. Dapas, Deputy Regional Administrator. [FR Doc. E7-15046 Filed 8-1-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 50-293] Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station; Notice of Availability of the Final Supplement 29 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Regarding the License Renewal of Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, Commission) has published a final plant-specific supplement to the “Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants (GEIS),” NUREG-1437, regarding the renewal of operating license DPR-35 for an additional 20 years of operation for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (Pilgrim). Pilgrim is located on the western shore of Cape Cod in the Town of Plymouth, Plymouth County, Massachusetts. It is 38 miles southeast of Boston, Massachusetts, and 44 miles east of Providence, Rhode Island. Possible alternatives to the proposed action (license renewal) include no action and reasonable alternative energy sources. As discussed in Section 9.3 of the final Supplement 29, the recommendation of the staff is that the Commission determine that the adverse environmental impacts of license renewal for Pilgrim are not so great that preserving the option of license renewal for energy-planning decision makers would be unreasonable. The recommendation is based on:

(1)The analysis and findings in the GEIS;

(2)the Environmental Report submitted by Entergy;

(3)consultation with Federal, State, and local agencies;

(4)the staff's own independent review; and

(5)the staff's consideration of public comments. The final Supplement 29 to the GEIS is publicly available at the NRC Public Document Room (PDR), located at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland, 20852, or from the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). The ADAMS Public Electronic Reading Room is accessible at *http://adamswebsearch.nrc.gov/dologin.htm* . The Accession Numbers for the final Supplement 29 to the GEIS are ML071990020 Volume 1 and ML071990027 Volume 2. Persons who do not have access to ADAMS, or who encounter problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, should contact the NRC's PDR reference staff by telephone at 1-800-397-4209, or 301-415-4737, or by e-mail at *pdr@nrc.gov* . In addition, the final supplement will be available at the following libraries for public inspection: the Plymouth Public Library, 132 South Street, the Duxbury Free Library, 77 Alden Street, and the Kingston Public Library, 6 Green Street. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: Ms. Alicia Williamson, Environmental Branch B, Division of License Renewal, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Mail Stop O-11F1, Washington, DC 20555-0001. Ms. Williamson may be contacted by telephone at 1-800-368-5642, extension 1878 or via e-mail at *arw1@nrc.gov* . Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 26th day of July, 2007. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Rani L. Franovich, Branch Chief, Environmental Branch B, Division of License Renewal, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. E7-15051 Filed 8-1-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 030-07188] Notice of Environmental Assessment Related to the Issuance of a License Amendment to By-product Material License No. 21-05199-02, for Unrestricted Release of Former Facilities for the State of Michigan, Department of Environmental Quality, Lansing, MI AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Issuance of Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for License Amendment. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Snell, Senior Health Physicist, Decommissioning Branch, Division of Nuclear Materials Safety, Region III, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2443 Warrenville Road, Lisle, Illinois 60532; telephone:

(630)829-9871; fax number:

(630)515-1259; or by email at *wgs@nrc.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

(NRC)is considering the issuance of an amendment to NRC By-product Materials License No. 21-05199-02, which is held by the State of Michigan, Department of Environmental Quality (licensee). The amendment would authorize the decommissioning and unrestricted release of the licensee's former facilities located at 3423 and 3500 N. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Lansing, Michigan (the facilities). The NRC has prepared an Environmental Assessment in support of this action in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 51. Based on the Environmental Assessment, the NRC has determined that a Finding of No Significant Impact is appropriate. The amendment to the State of Michigan's Department of Environmental Quality license will be issued following the publication of this Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact. I. Environmental Assessment Identification of Proposed Action The proposed action would approve the State of Michigan's Department of Environmental Quality request to amend its license and release the facilities for unrestricted use in accordance with 10 CFR Part 20, Subpart E. The proposed action does not pertain to the licensee's radiological laboratory at 815 Terminal Road, in Lansing, Michigan, where licensed activities will continue. The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's request to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

(NRC)to amend its license by letter dated February 28, 2007 (ADAMS Accession No. ML070590426). The State of Michigan's Department of Environmental Quality was first licensed to use by-product materials at its facilities at 3500 N. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. (formerly 3500 N. Logan) on June 30, 1964, and at 3423 N. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. on February 21, 1997. The licensee is authorized to use by-product materials for activities involving instrument calibration and for analysis of environmental samples. The licensee was authorized to use sealed sources at the facilities containing cesium-137, cobalt-60, americium-241, nickel-63, and strontium-90. Isotopes that were authorized for use at the facilities in an unsealed form included any by-product material up to a maximum of 100 millicuries at any one time. At the 3500 N. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. address, the licensee used by-product materials in two buildings. The licensee analyzed environmental and special samples in its Nuclear Counting Facility in Building 44, and stored radiological materials in its Radioactive Material Storage Bunker in Building 20. The licensee ceased using the Nuclear Counting Laboratory and moved all calibration standards, environmental samples and special samples to its new radiological laboratory at 815 Terminal Road, Lansing, Michigan, prior to conducting final status surveys in November 2000 to verify that the 3500 N. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. facility could be released for unrestricted use. In October 2000, the Michigan Department of Public Health requested the NRC terminate its SUB-1385 license, which also authorized the use of radioactive material in the Radioactive Material Storage Bunker in Building 20. The Michigan Department of Public Health provided a Final Status Survey Report that documented that the Radioactive Material Storage Bunker in Building 20 had been surveyed for residual contamination in 1998 and was acceptable for unrestricted use. In January 2001, the NRC terminated the SUB-1385 license and released the Radioactive Material Storage Bunker in Building 20 for unrestricted use. The licensee stated in a July 11, 2007, telephone conference, that it had not used the Radioactive Material Storage Bunker in Building 20 since it had been released for unrestricted use by the NRC in 2001. At the 3423 N. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. address, the licensee maintained a facility for the calibration of portable radiation survey instruments and the storage of radioactive material. The licensee ceased using the calibration/storage facility and moved all radiation sources and environmental samples to its new calibration facility at 815 Terminal Road, Lansing, Michigan, prior to conducting final status surveys in November 2000 to verify that the 3423 N. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. facility could be released for unrestricted use. The licensee conducted surveys of the facilities as part of its decommissioning activities and provided this information to the NRC to demonstrate that the radiological condition there is consistent with radiological criteria for unrestricted use in 10 CFR Part 20, Subpart E. The licensee was not required to submit a decommissioning plan to the NRC since any decommissioning activities and procedures implemented were consistent with those approved for routine operations. No radiological remediation activities are required to complete the proposed action. Need for the Proposed Action The licensee is requesting this license amendment because it has moved out of the facilities, and is conducting licensed activities at another location. The NRC is fulfilling its responsibilities under the Atomic Energy Act to make a decision on the proposed action for decommissioning that ensures that residual radioactivity is reduced to a level that is protective of the public health and safety and the environment, and allows the facilities to be released for unrestricted use. Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action The NRC staff reviewed the information provided and surveys performed by the licensee to demonstrate that the release of the facilities is consistent with the radiological criteria for unrestricted use specified in 10 CFR 20.1402. Based on its review, the staff determined that there were no radiological impacts associated with the proposed action because no radiological remediation activities were required to complete the proposed action, and that the radiological criteria for unrestricted use in § 20.1402 have been met. Based on its review, the staff determined that the radiological environmental impacts from the proposed action for the facilities are bounded by the “Generic Environmental Impact Statement in Support of Rulemaking on Radiological Criteria for License Termination of NRC-Licensed Nuclear Facilities” (NUREG-1496). Additionally, no non-radiological or cumulative impacts were identified. Therefore, the NRC has determined that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment. Alternatives to the Proposed Action The only alternative to the proposed action is to take no action. Under the no-action alternative, the facilities would remain under an NRC license and would not be released for unrestricted use. Denial of the license amendment request would result in no change to current conditions. The no-action alternative is not acceptable because it is inconsistent with 10 CFR 30.36, which requires that decommissioning of by-product material facilities be completed and approved by the NRC after licensed activities cease. This alternative would impose an unnecessary regulatory burden in controlling access to the former facility, and limit potential benefits from the future use of the facility. Conclusion The NRC staff concluded that the proposed action is consistent with the NRC's unrestricted release criteria specified in 10 CFR 20.1402. Because the proposed action will not significantly impact the quality of the human environment, the NRC staff concludes that the proposed action is the preferred alternative. Agencies and Persons Consulted The NRC staff has determined that the proposed action will not affect listed species or critical habitats. Therefore, no further consultation is required under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. Likewise, the NRC staff has determined that the proposed action is not a type of activity that has potential to cause effect on historic properties. Therefore, consultation under section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act is not required. The NRC consulted with the Michigan Department of Community Health (DCH). The Michigan DCH, Bureau of Health Systems, Division of Health Facilities and Services, was provided the draft EA for comment on July 13, 2007. Mr. Bruce Matkovich, Manager, Radiation Safety Section, with the Michigan DCH, responded to the NRC by e-mail on July 16, 2007, indicating that the State had no comments regarding the NRC Environmental Assessment for the release of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality facilities. II. Finding of No Significant Impact On the basis of the EA in support of the proposed license amendment, the NRC has determined that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment. Thus, the NRC has not prepared an environmental impact statement for the proposed action. III. Further Information Documents related to this action, including the application for amendment and supporting documentation, are available electronically at the NRC's Electronic Reading Room at *http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.* From this site, you can access the NRC's Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS), which provides text and image files of NRC's public documents. If you do not have access to ADAMS, or if there are problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, contact the NRC Public Document Room

(PDR)Reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by e-mail to *pdr@nrc.gov.* The documents and ADAMS accession numbers related to this notice are: 1. Robert D. Skowronek, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, letter to Patricia Pelke, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, February 22, 2007 (ADAMS Accession No. ML070590426). 2. Telephone Conversation Record, Initiated by William Snell, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, to Robert Skowronek, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, on July 11, 2007 (ADAMS Accession No. ML071930403). 3. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Environmental Review Guidance for Licensing Actions Associated with NMSS Programs,” NUREG-1748, August 2003. 4. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Generic Environmental Impact Statement in Support of Rulemaking on Radiological Criteria for License Termination of NRC-Licensed Nuclear Facilities,” NUREG-1496, August 1994. 5. NRC, NUREG-1757, “Consolidated NMSS Decommissioning Guidance,” Volumes 1-3, September 2003. Documents may also be viewed electronically on the public computers located at the NRC's PDR, O 1 F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. The PDR reproduction contractor will copy documents for a fee. Dated at Lisle, Illinois, this 20th day of July 2007. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Patrick L. Louden, Chief, Decommissioning Branch, Division of Nuclear Materials Safety, Region III. [FR Doc. E7-15040 Filed 8-1-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Clarification to Regulatory Guide 1.200, Revision 1 AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Clarification to Regulatory Guide. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Drouin, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. Telephone: 301-415-6675; e-mail: *MXD@nrc.gov* . Introduction The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

(NRC)is issuing a clarification to an existing guide in the agency's regulatory guide

(RG)series. The NRC has developed this series to describe and make available to the public such information as methods that are acceptable to the NRC staff for implementing specific parts of the NRC's regulations, techniques that the staff uses in evaluating specific problems or postulated accidents, and data that the staff needs in its review of applications for permits and licenses. At this time, the NRC is issuing a clarification to Revision 1 of RG 1.200, “An Approach for Determining the Technical Adequacy of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Results for Risk-Informed Activities,” issued January 2007. The purpose of this clarification is to provide additional explanation to the staff's regulatory position with regard to defining the technical acceptability of a probabilistic risk assessment (PRA), specifically with respect to the treatment of the sources of model uncertainty and the related assumptions in the base PRA. The clarification to RG 1.200, Revision 1 can be found in Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession Number ML071940235. The clarification to Regulatory Guide 1.200, Revision 1, is intended for licensees of nuclear power plants. Revision 1 of this RG remains in effect for licensees of nuclear power plants. The NRC staff encourages and welcomes comments and suggestions in connection with improvements to published RGs, as well as items for inclusion in RGs that are currently under development. You may submit comments by any of the following methods. 1. *Mail comments to:* Rulemaking, Directives and Editing Branch, Office of Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. 2. *Hand-deliver comments to:* Rulemaking, Directives and Editing Branch, Office of Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852, between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. on Federal workdays. 3. *Fax comments to:* Rulemaking, Directives and Editing Branch, Office of Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission at

(301)415-5144. 4. Direct requests for technical information about this clarification to Revision 1 of RG 1.200 to Ms. Mary Drouin at

(301)415-6675 or *MXD@nrc.gov* . RGs are available for inspection or downloading through the NRC's public Web site at *http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/reg-guides/* . In addition, this clarification to Revision 1 of RG 1.200 is available for inspection or downloading through the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) at *http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html* under ADAMS Accession No. ML071940235. The clarification to Revision 1 of RG 1.200 and other related publicly available documents can also be viewed electronically on computers in the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR), which is located at 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. The reproduction contractor at the PDR will make copies of documents for a fee. The mailing address for the PDR is USNRC, PDR, Washington, DC 20555-0001. The PDR can also be reached by telephone at

(301)415-4737 or

(800)397-4205, by fax at

(301)415-3548, and by e-mail to *PDR@nrc.gov* . RGs are not copyrighted, and Commission approval is not required to reproduce them. (5 U.S.C. 552(a)) Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 27th day of July, 2007. For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Farouk Eltawila, Director, Division of Risk Assessment and Special Projects, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research. [FR Doc. E7-15036 Filed 8-1-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION NUREG-1556, Volume 9, Revision 2, “Consolidated Guidance About Materials Licenses Program-Specific Guidance About Medical Use Licenses; Draft Guidance Document for Comment AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of availability for public comment. SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission

(NRC)has amended its regulations to include jurisdiction over certain radium sources, accelerator-produced radioactive materials, and certain naturally occurring radioactive material, as required by the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct), which was signed into law on August 8, 2005. The EPAct expanded the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 definition of byproduct material to include these radioactive materials. Subsequently, these radioactive materials were placed under NRC's regulatory authority. NRC is revising its regulations to provide a regulatory framework that includes these newly added radioactive materials. See SECY-07-0062, “Final Rule: Requirements for Expanded Definition of Byproduct Material,” dated April 3, 2007, for information on that rulemaking. Two licensing guidance documents in the NUREG-1556 series are being revised along with these new regulations to provide guidance related to the new requirements:

(1)NUREG-1556, Volume 13, Revision 1, “Consolidated Guidance About Materials Licenses—Program-Specific Guidance About Commercial Radiopharmacy Licenses,” and

(2)NUREG-1556, Volume 9, Revision 2, “Consolidated Guidance About Materials Licenses—Program Specific Guidance About Medical Use Licenses.” A new volume in the NUREG-1556 series has also been developed to address the production of radioactive material using an accelerator. This NUREG is entitled NUREG-1556, Volume 21, “Consolidated Guidance About Materials Licenses—Program-Specific Guidance About Possession Licenses for Production of Radioactive Material Using an Accelerator.” This notice is announcing the availability of one of these three licensing guidance documents for public comment: NUREG-1556, Volume 9, Revision 2. The other two NUREGs were previously noticed for public comment:

(1)NUREG-1556, Volume 13, Revision 1, on July 3, 2007 (72 FR 36526), and

(2)NUREG-1556, Volume 21, on May 29, 2007 (72 FR 29555). DATES: Please submit comments on NUREG-1556, Volume 9, Revision 2, by September 4, 2007. Comments received after this date will be considered if practical to do so, but the NRC staff is able to ensure consideration only for those comments received on or before this date. ADDRESSES: NUREG-1556, Volume 9, Revision 2, “Consolidated Guidance About Materials Licenses—Program-Specific Guidance About Medical Use Licenses,” Draft Report for Comment, is available for inspection and copying for a fee at the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR), Public File Area O-1F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. Publicly available documents created or received at the NRC after November 1, 1999, are available electronically at the NRC's Electronic Reading Room at *http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/ADAMS/index.html* . From this site, the public can gain entry into the NRC's Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS), which provides text and image files of the NRC's public documents. The ADAMS Accession Number for NUREG-1556, Volume 9, Revision 2, is ML071860070. If you do not have access to ADAMS or if there are problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, contact the NRC PDR Reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by e-mail to *pdr@nrc.gov* . The document will also be posted on NRC's public Web site at:

(1)*http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1556/* on the “Consolidated Guidance About Materials Licenses (NUREG-1556)” Web site page, and

(2)*http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/docs4comment.html* on the “Draft NUREG Series Publications for Comment.” It will also be posted on the Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs' NARM (Naturally-Occurring and Accelerator-Produced Radioactive Material) Toolbox Web site page at: *http://nrc-stp.ornl.gov/narmtoolbox.html* under the heading of “Licensing Guidance.” A free single copy, to the extent of supply, may be requested by writing to the Office of the Chief Information Officer, Reproduction and Distribution Services, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Printing and Graphics Branch, Washington, DC 20555-0001; facsimile: 301-415-2289; e-mail: *Distribution@nrc.gov* . Please submit comments to Chief, Rulemaking, Directives and Editing Branch, Division of Administrative Services, Office of Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, 20555-0001. You may also deliver comments to 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD, between 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Federal workdays, or by e-mail to: *nrcrep@nrc.gov* . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Torre Taylor, Division of Intergovernmental Liaison and Rulemaking, Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone

(301)415-7900, e-mail: *tmt@nrc.gov* . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On August 8, 2005, the President signed into law the EPAct. Among other provisions, section 651(e) of the EPAct expanded the definition of byproduct material as defined in section 11e. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (AEA), placing additional byproduct material under the NRC's jurisdiction, and required the Commission to provide a regulatory framework for licensing and regulating this additional byproduct material. Specifically, section 651(e) of the EPAct expanded the definition of byproduct material by:

(1)Adding any discrete source of radium-226 that is produced, extracted, or converted after extraction, before, on, or after the date of enactment of the EPAct for use for a commercial, medical, or research activity; or any material that has been made radioactive by use of a particle accelerator and is produced, extracted, or converted after extraction, before, on, or after the date of enactment of the EPAct for use for a commercial, medical, or research activity (Section 11e.(3) of the AEA); and

(2)adding any discrete source of naturally occurring radioactive material, other than source material, that the Commission, in consultation with the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, the Secretary of the Department of Energy, the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, and the head of any other appropriate Federal agency, determines would pose a threat similar to the threat posed by a discrete source of radium-226 to the public health and safety or the common defense and security; and is extracted or converted after extraction before, on, or after the date of enactment of the EPAct for use in a commercial, medical, or research activity (Section 11e.(4) of the AEA). NRC is revising its regulations to provide a regulatory framework that includes these newly added radioactive materials. *See* SECY-07-0062, “Final Rule: Requirements for Expanded Definition of Byproduct Material,” dated April 3, 2007, for information on that rulemaking. Discussion As part of the rulemaking effort to address the mandate of the EPAct, the NRC also evaluated the need to revise certain licensing guidance documents to provide necessary guidance to applicants in preparing license applications to include the use of the newly added radioactive material as byproduct material. Two NUREG-1556 documents are being revised to provide additional guidance to licensees:

(1)NUREG-1556, Volume 13, Revision 1, “Consolidated Guidance About Materials Licenses—Program-Specific Guidance About Commercial Radiopharmacy Licenses,” and

(2)NUREG-1556, Volume 9, Revision 2, “Consolidated Guidance About Materials Licenses—Program-Specific Guidance About Medical Use Licenses.” Additionally, a new NUREG-1556 volume has been developed as Volume 21 to address production of radioactive material using an accelerator. This NUREG-1556, Volume 21, is entitled: “Consolidated Guidance About Materials Licenses—Program-Specific Guidance About Possession Licenses for Production of Radioactive Material Using an Accelerator.” At this time, NRC is announcing the availability for public comment NUREG-1556, Volume 9, Revision 2, “Consolidated Guidance About Materials Licenses—Program-Specific Guidance About Medical Use Licenses,” Draft Report for Comment. The other two NUREGs were previously noticed for public comment:

(1)NUREG-1556, Volume 13, Revision 1, on July 3, 2007 (72 FR 36526) and

(2)NUREG-1556, Volume 21, on May 29, 2007 (72 FR 29555). NUREG-1556, Volume 9, Revision 2, “Consolidated Guidance About Materials Licenses—Program-Specific Guidance About Medical Use Licenses,” provides guidance for applicants in preparing their license applications for the medical use of byproduct material. Volume 9 is being revised primarily to provide additional guidance related to the NARM rule, as discussed above. In the draft final rule for the NARM rulemaking, the concept of consortiums and noncommercial distribution was addressed. In summary, because of the short-lived radionuclides associated with Positron Emission Tomography (PET), the source of these radioactive materials needs to be produced in the facility of use or within close proximity. The NRC developed a new regulatory process based on existing practices for consortiums and noncommercial distribution. For this purpose, educational institutions, medical use facilities or Federal facilities may form consortiums with adjacent or nearby hospitals to jointly own or share in the operation and maintenance costs of the PET radionuclide production facility. This is discussed in more detail in SECY-07-0062, “Final Rule: Requirements for Expanded Definition of Byproduct Material,” dated April 3, 2007, and within the draft **Federal Register** notice that is provided as an attachment to SECY-07-0062. NUREG-1556, Volume 9, Revision 2, provides guidance for applicants in licensees about consortiums and noncommercial distribution in Sections 1 and 8, and in Appendix AA. NRC is requesting specific comments on this guidance to ensure that it is clear and easily understood by affected stakeholders. It is also being revised to clarify training and experience requirements, replaces NRC Form 313A with six new NRC Form 313A forms specific to types of authorizations. References and information related to Subpart J of 10 CFR Part 35 have been removed since these regulatory requirements expired on October 25, 2005. Additionally, other minor changes are being made that are administrative in nature, such as updating the Agreement State section and updating references. Also, information related to identifying and protecting sensitive information is being updated. NRC is only requesting comments on the specific changes in this document related to those revisions discussed above. NRC will make corrections if any errors or editorial corrections are noted; however, any comments not related to these specific changes will be evaluated during the next routine review of NUREG-1556, Volume 9. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 26th day of July, 2007. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Dennis K. Rathbun, Director, Division of Intergovernmental, Liaison and Rulemaking, Office of Federal and State Materials, and Environmental Management Programs. [FR Doc. E7-15049 Filed 8-1-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Amending Federal Financial Assistance-Related Forms to Include Universal Identifier AGENCY: Office of Federal Financial Management and Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget. ACTION: Notice; request for comments. SUMMARY: The Office of Management and Budget

(OMB)proposes to authorize each Federal agency that receives applications for Federal financial assistance to add a field for the applicant's Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering System

(DUNS)number to application forms previously approved by OMB. This proposed update would broaden the directive's effect to all forms of Federal financial assistance covered by the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (the “Act”) including grants, subgrants, loans, awards, cooperative agreements, and other forms of financial assistance. DATES: Comments are due by September 4, 2007. ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to Marguerite Pridgen, Office of Federal Financial Management, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503; telephone 202-395-7844; fax 202-395-3952; e-mail *mpridgen@omb.eop.gov.* Due to potential delays in OMB's receipt and processing of mail sent through the U.S. Postal Service, we encourage respondents to submit comments electronically to ensure timely receipt. We cannot guarantee that comments mailed will be received before the comment closing date. Please include “Amending Forms for DUNS” in the subject line of the email message; please also include the full body of your comments in the text of the message and as an attachment. Include your name, title, organization, postal address, telephone number, and e-mail address in your message. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marguerite Pridgen at the addresses noted above. Authority: Sec. 2, Pub. L. 109-282, 102 Stat. 1186. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office of Management and Budget

(OMB)proposes to authorize each Federal agency that receives applications for Federal financial assistance to add a field for the applicant's Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering System

(DUNS)number to application forms previously approved by OMB. The intent of authorizing agencies to add the field without additional OMB approval is to enable the agencies to require applicants other than individual persons to provide DUNS numbers for all applications submitted on or after October 1, 2007. This proposal thereby would update the policy in the OMB directive issued on June 27, 2003 [68 FR 38403], “Use of a Universal Identifier by Grant Applicants.” That directive authorized agencies to add the DUNS number as a required field for applications leading to the award of two specific forms of Federal financial assistance: Grants and cooperative agreements. This proposed update would broaden the directive's effect to all forms of Federal financial assistance covered by the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (the “Act”) including grants, subgrants, loans, awards, cooperative agreements, and other forms of financial assistance. The reason for the proposed update is that the DUNS number will be used as the unique identifier for recipient entities that is required by the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (Pub. L. 109-282). Under that Act, OMB must ensure the establishment and maintenance of a location on the World Wide Web through which the public may access and search data on agencies' awards. The unique identifier of the recipient entity is one of the data elements that the Act requires for each award. Note that the Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense Acquisition Regulations Council (Councils) are addressing the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act requirements for contracts, subcontracts, purchase orders, task orders and delivery orders under separate **Federal Register** notices. Danny Werfel, *Deputy Controller.* [FR Doc. E7-15044 Filed 8-1-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3110-01-P OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE Notice of Effective Date for Goods of Mexico for Certain Modifications of the NAFTA Rules of Origin AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative. ACTION: Notice of effective date. SUMMARY: In Proclamation 8111 of February 28, 2007, the President modified the rules of origin for certain goods of Mexico under the North American Free Trade Agreement (the “NAFTA”) incorporated in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (the “HTS”). The proclamation stated that the modifications would be effective on the date to be announced in the **Federal Register** by the United States Trade Representative (the “USTR”) and would apply to goods of Mexico that are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the date indicated in the proclamation. The purpose of this notice is to announce that the effective date for the modifications is July 30, 2007. The changes were printed in the **Federal Register** of March 6, 2007 (72 FR 10028). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, please contact Caroyl Miller, Deputy Special Textile Negotiator, Office of the United States Trade Representative, 600 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20508, fax number,

(202)395-5639. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Presidential Proclamation 6641 of December 15, 1993 implemented the North American Free Trade Agreement (the “NAFTA”) with respect to the United States and, pursuant to the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (Pub. L. 103-182) (the “NAFTA Implementation Act”), incorporated in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (the “HTS”) the tariff modifications and rules of origin necessary or appropriate to carry out the NAFTA. Section 202 of the NAFTA Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 3332) provides rules for determining whether goods imported into the United States originate in the territory of a NAFTA party and thus are eligible for the tariff and other treatment contemplated under the NAFTA. Section 202(q) of the NAFTA Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 3332(q)) authorizes the President to proclaim, as a part of the HTS, the rules of origin set out in the NAFTA and to proclaim modifications to such previously proclaimed rules of origin, subject to the consultation and layover requirements of section 103(a) of the NAFTA Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 3313(a)). The President determined that the modifications to the HTS contained in Proclamation 8811 pursuant to sections 201 and 202 of the NAFTA Implementation Act were appropriate and proclaimed such changes with respect to goods of Mexico entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the date indicated in the Annex to that Proclamation. The President decided that the effective date of the modifications shall be announced by the United States Trade Representative (USTR). On March 15, 2007, the government of Mexico obtained the necessary authorization to implement the rule of origin changes with respect to goods of the United States. Subsequently, officials from the government of Mexico and the government of the United States agreed to implement these changes with respect to each other's eligible goods, effective July 30, 2007. Scott D. Quesenberry, Special Textile Negotiator. [FR Doc. E7-15034 Filed 8-1-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3190-W7-P POSTAL SERVICE BOARD OF GOVERNORS Sunshine Act Meeting Date and Time: Tuesday, August 7, 2007, at 12:30 p.m.; and Wednesday, August 8, 2007, at 8:30 a.m. and 10:30 a.m. Place: Washington, DC, at U.S. Postal Service Headquarters, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., in the Benjamin Franklin Room. Status: August 7-12:30 p.m.—Closed; August 8-8:30 a.m.—Open; August 8-10:30 a.m.—Closed. Matters To Be Considered Tuesday, August 7 at 12:30 p.m. (Closed) 1. Strategic Issues. 2. Preliminary Report on Goals and Performance Assessment for Fiscal Year 2008. 3. Financial Update. 4. Preliminary Fiscal Year 2008 Integrated Financial Plan and Financial Outlook. 5. Rate Case Update. 6. Labor Negotiations Update. 7. Personnel Matters and Compensation Issues. 8. Governors' Executive Session—Discussion of prior agenda items and Board Governance. Wednesday, August 8 at 8:30 a.m.

(Open)1. Minutes of Previous Meetings, May 1-2; June 19; and July 10, 2007. 2. Remarks of the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Board. 3. Remarks of the Postmaster General and CEO Jack Potter. 4. Committee Reports. 5. Quarterly Report on Service Performance. 6. Quarterly Report on Financial Performance. 7. Tentative Agenda for the September 25-26, 2007, meeting in Washington, DC. Wednesday, August 8 at 10:30 a.m. (Closed)—if needed 1. Continuation of Tuesday's closed session agenda. Contact Person for More Information: Wendy A. Hocking, Secretary of the Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20260-1000. Telephone

(202)268-4800. Wendy A. Hocking Secretary. [FR Doc. 07-3785 Filed 7-30-07; 4:48 pm]

Connectionstraces to 8

Traces to 8 documents

U.S. Code

CFR