Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2007-06-08 · Postal Service · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Final rule

30,350 words·~138 min read·/register/2007/06/08/07-2847·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Postal Service
Action: Final rule
Citation: FR Doc. 07-2847 · 39 CFR 111

Summary

The Postal Service TM is revising the Mailing Standards of the United States Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual to require customs declarations on certain Priority Mail® mailpieces to or from ZIP Code TM 96799 and ZIP Codes TM beginning with the prefix 969. EFFECTIVE DATE: June 8, 2007.

Dates

This final rule is effective on July 9, 2007.

Supplementary Information

In January 2003, the Postal Service published a Postal Bulletin article asking customers to affix either PS Form 2976, Customs Declaration CN22—Sender's Declaration , or PS Form 2976-A, Customs Declaration and Dispatch Note—CP72 , to all mailpieces weighing 16 ounces or more addressed to Guam. In March 2003, we revised our request to include mailpieces addressed to all ZIP Codes beginning with the 969 ZIP Code prefix. On September 13, 2006, we published a Proposed rule in the Federal Register , (71 FR 54006), to require customs declarations on certain Priority Mail mailpieces to or from ZIP Codes TM beginning with the prefix 969. We are now requiring that the appropriate customs form be affixed to all Priority Mail pieces weighing 16 ounces or more sent to or from ZIP Codes beginning with the prefix 969. We are also expanding the requirement to affix the appropriate customs form to all Priority Mail pieces weighing 16 ounces or more that are sent to or from ZIP Code 96799, American Samoa. We are also removing the language regarding “dutiable merchandise” from this final rule. The language is ambiguous at best and does not address a specific concern. Comments Interested persons were invited to comment on the proposed rule. One comment was received. The commenter questioned the underlying rationale for the new rule. In response, these destinations are outside the customs territory of the United States. Hence, a customs form would facilitate the identification of the contents of the mail to the extent customs inspections may be applied to this traffic. In addition, use of a customs form would enable the Postal Service to meet requirements imposed by airlines to carry Priority Mail above a certain weight threshold. Such requirements are not imposed by surface transportation carriers, and are not needed for other classes of mail carried by air carriers. After reviewing and considering the comments, we adopt the following changes to Mailing Standards of the United States Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM), incorporated by reference in the Code of Federal Regulations. See 39 CFR 111.1. List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 111 Administrative practice and procedure, Postal Service. Accordingly, 39 CFR part 111 is amended as follows: PART 111—[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for 39 CFR part 111 continues to read as follows: Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 39 U.S.C. 101, 401, 403, 404, 414, 416, 3001-3011, 3201-3219, 3403-3406, 3621, 3626, 5001. 2. Revise the Mailing Standards of the United States Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM), as follows: 600 Basic Standards for All Mailing Services 608 Postal Information and Resources 2.0 Domestic Mail [Add new 2.4 as follows:] 2.4 Customs Forms Required Regardless of contents, all Priority Mail weighing 16 ounces or more sent from the United States to a ZIP Code beginning with the prefix 969 and ZIP Code 96799, and all Priority Mail sent from a ZIP Code beginning with the prefix 969 and ZIP Code 96799 to the United States, must bear either Form 2976 or Form 2976-A. This mail must be presented to an employee at a post office, to a letter carrier when using Click-N-Ship with Carrier Pickup, or to a Postal Service employee designated by the postmaster. Neva R. Watson, Attorney, Legislative. [FR Doc. E7-11069 Filed 6-7-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7710-12-P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 51 [EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0079, FRL-8324-3] RIN 2060-AO00 Phase 2 of the Final Rule To Implement the 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard—Notice of Reconsideration AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final notice of reconsideration. SUMMARY: On December 19, 2006, EPA published, as a proposed rule, a notice of reconsideration for several aspects of the November 29, 2005, Phase 2 of the final rule to implement the 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). These issues relate to nitrogen oxide (NO X ) reasonably available control technology (RACT) for electric generating units (EGUs) in Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) states and to certain new source review (NSR) provisions. The notice of reconsideration was published as a result of a petition for reconsideration which had been submitted by the Natural Resources Defense Council. In this action, EPA summarizes and responds to comments received in response to the notice of reconsideration, and EPA announces its final actions taken in response to these comments. As a result of this reconsideration process, EPA is changing the deadline for states in the CAIR region to submit EGU NO X RACT SIPs subpart 2 ozone nonattainment areas classified as moderate and above. EPA is also modifying its guidance on the issue of NO X RACT for EGUs in CAIR states.

Connectionstraces to 22
12 references not yet in our index
  • 39 CFR 111
  • 40 CFR 51
  • 285 F.3d 63
  • 40 CFR 52.25(k)
  • 40 CFR 9
  • Pub. L. 104-4
  • Pub. L. 104-113
  • 42 USC 7401-7671q
  • 40 CFR 52
  • 40 CFR 300
  • 40 CFR 300.105(e)(3)
  • 42 USC 9601-9657
Citation graph
cites case law
Cites 34 · showing 12Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.