Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

§
Marginalia
Code · REGISTER · 2007-05-16 · Federal Highway Administration (FWHA), DOT · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Notice of Limitation on Claims for Judicial Review of Actions by FHWA and other Federal Agencies

13,573 words·~62 min read·/register/2007/05/16/07-2395

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Highway Administration Notice of Limitation on Claims for the Campus Parkway AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FWHA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of Limitation on Claims for Judicial Review of Actions by FHWA and other Federal Agencies. SUMMARY: This notice announces actions taken by FHWA and other Federal agencies that are final within the meaning of 23 U.S.C. 139( *I* )(1). These actions relate to a proposed 7.25 km (4.5 mile) Campus Parkway, which would be a four-lane expressway beginning at the Mission Avenue Interchange on State Route 99 and extending north on new alignment to Yosemite Avenue, south and east of the City of Merced in Merced County, State of California.
These actions grant approvals for the project. DATES: By this notice, the FHWA is advising the public of final agency actions subject to 23 U.S.C. 139( *I* )(1). A claim seeking judicial review of the Federal agency actions on the expressway project will be barred unless the claim is filed on or before November 13, 2007. If the Federal law that authorizes judicial review of a claim provides a time period of less than 180 days for filing such claim, then that shorter time period still applies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edrie Vinson, Senior Environmental Specialist, Federal Highway Administration, 650 Capitol Mall, Suite 4-100, Sacramento, CA 95814, weekdays between 7 a.m. and 4 p.m. (Pacific Time), telephone
(916)498-5852, e-mail: *edrie.vinson@fhwa.dot.gov* or Kim Turner, Wildlife Biologist, Endangered Species Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2800 Cottage Way W-2605, Sacramento, CA 95825, telephone
(916)414-6577, e-mail: *kim_s_turner@fws.gov* . Margaret Lawrence, Senior Environmental Planner, California Department of Transportation, 1976 East Charter Way, Stockton, CA 95201, telephone
(209)948-7427, e-mail: *margaret_lawrence@dot.ca.gov* or Steve Rough, Project Manager, Merced County, 345 West 7th Street, Merced, CA 95340, telephone
(209)385-7601, e-mail: *SRough@co.merced.ca.us* . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the FHWA and other Federal agencies have taken final agency actions subject to 23 U.S.C. 139( *I* )(1) by issuing approvals for the following expressway project in the State of California: Campus Parkway between the Mission Avenue Interchange on State Route 99 in Merced County. This project would improve existing and future circulation east of the City of Merced and provide access to planned developments north and east of the city as well as the first phase of the Merced Campus of the University of California. This would be accomplished by constructing a four-lane expressway south and east of the City of Merced, in Merced County, from the Mission Avenue Interchange at State Route 99 north to Yosemite Avenue northeast of the city. The actions by the Federal agencies and the laws under which such actions were taken are described in the Final Environmental Impact Statement
(FEIS)for the project, approved on November 28, 2006, in the Record of Decision
(ROD)issued on April 30, 2007, and in other documents in the FHWA project files. The FEIS, ROD, and other project records are available by contacting the FHWA or the California Department of Transportation at the addresses provided above. The FHWA FEIS and ROD can be viewed and downloaded from the project Web site *http://www.dot.ca.gov/dist10/d10projects/merced/reports.htm* or viewed at public libraries in the project area. This notice applies to all Federal agency decisions as of the issuance date of this notice and all laws under which such actions were taken, including but not limited to: 1. *General:* National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4351); Federal-Aid Highway Act (23 U.S.C. 109). 2. *Air:* Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671(q). 3. *Wildlife:* Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544 and Section 1536), Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703-712). 4. *Historic and Cultural Resources:* Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470[f] *et seq.* ). 5. *Social and Economic:* Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000[d]-2000[d][1]; Farmland Protection Policy Act
(FPPA)(7 U.S.C. 4201-4209). 6. *Wetlands and Water Resources:* Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251-1377 (Section 404, Section 401, Section 319). 7. *Executive Orders:* E.O. 11990 Protection of Wetlands; E.O. 11990 Floodplain Management; E.O. 12898 Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low Income Populations; E.O. 13112 Invasive Species. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities apply to this program.) Authority: 23 U.S.C. 139( *I* )(1). Issued on: May 8, 2007. Gene K. Fong, Division Administrator, Federal Highway Administration, Sacramento, California. [FR Doc. E7-9377 Filed 5-15-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-RY-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration [Docket No. FMCSA-00-7165, FMCSA-00-7918, FMCSA-00-8398, FMCSA-02-13411, FMCSA-03-14223, FMCSA-05-20027, FMCSA-05-20560] Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of renewal of exemptions; request for comments. SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its decision to renew the exemptions from the vision requirement in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations for 26 individuals. FMCSA has statutory authority to exempt individuals from the vision requirement if the exemptions granted will not compromise safety. The Agency has concluded that granting these exemptions will provide a level of safety that will be equivalent to, or greater than, the level of safety maintained without the exemptions for these commercial motor vehicle
(CMV)drivers. DATES: This decision is effective May 31, 2007. Comments must be received on or before June 15, 2007. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by DOT Docket Management System
(DMS)Docket Numbers FMCSA-00-7165, FMCSA-00-7918, FMCSA-00-8398, FMCSA-02-13411, FMCSA-03-14223, FMCSA-05-20027, FMCSA-05-20560, using any of the following methods. • *Web site: http://dmses.dot.gov.* Follow the instructions for submitting comments on the DOT electronic docket site. • Fax: 1-202-493-2251. • *Mail:* Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, Room PL-401, Washington, DC 20590-0001. • *Hand Delivery:* Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. • *Federal eRulemaking Portal:* Go to *http://www.regulations.gov.* Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. *Instructions:* All submissions must include the Agency name and docket numbers for this Notice. Note that all comments received will be posted without change to *http://dms.dot.gov* , including any personal information provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading for further information. *Docket:* For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to *http://dms.dot.gov* at any time or Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The DMS is available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. If you want us to notify you that we received your comments, please include a self-addressed, stamped envelope or postcard or print the acknowledgement page that appears after submitting comments on-line. *Privacy Act:* Anyone may search the electronic form of all comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or of the person signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review the Department of Transportation's complete Privacy Act Statement in the **Federal Register** published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477; Apr. 11, 2000). This information is also available at *http://dms.dot.gov.* FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Mary D. Gunnels, Chief, Physical Qualifications Division,
(202)366-4001, *fmcsamedical@dot.gov* , FMCSA, Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Room 8301, Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., E.T., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Exemption Decision Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may renew an exemption from the vision requirements in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), which applies to drivers of CMVs in interstate commerce, for a two-year period if it finds “such exemption would likely achieve a level of safety that is equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be achieved absent such exemption.” The procedures for requesting an exemption (including renewals) are set out in 49 CFR part 381. This notice addresses 26 individuals who have requested renewal of their exemptions in accordance with FMCSA procedures. FMCSA has evaluated these 26 applications for renewal on their merits and decided to extend each exemption for a renewable two-year period. They are: Edmund J. Barron William E. Beckley Eddie M. Brown Charles C. Chapman Jeffery W. Cotner John K. Fank Bobby G. Fletcher Lonny L. Ford Larry G. Garcia Raymond G. Hayden Robert E. Hendrick James A. Kneece Joe S. Lassiter III Gene A. Lesher, Jr. Wallace F. Mahan, Sr. Velmer L. McClelland Anthony R. Miles Raymond E. Morelock Kenneth L. Nau David W. Peterson Frederick G. Robbins Jose C. Sanchez-Sanchez Francis L. Savell David M. Stout Daniel R. Viscaya Daniel E. Watkins These exemptions are extended subject to the following conditions:
(1)That each individual have a physical examination every year
(a)by an ophthalmologist or optometrist who attests that the vision in the better eye continues to meet the standard in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), and
(b)by a medical examiner who attests that the individual is otherwise physically qualified under 49 CFR 391.41;
(2)that each individual provide a copy of the ophthalmologist's or optometrist's report to the medical examiner at the time of the annual medical examination; and
(3)that each individual provide a copy of the annual medical certification to the employer for retention in the driver's qualification file and retain a copy of the certification on his/her person while driving for presentation to a duly authorized Federal, State, or local enforcement official. Each exemption will be valid for two years unless rescinded earlier by FMCSA. The exemption will be rescinded if:
(1)The person fails to comply with the terms and conditions of the exemption;
(2)the exemption has resulted in a lower level of safety than was maintained before it was granted; or
(3)continuation of the exemption would not be consistent with the goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315. Basis for Renewing Exemptions Under 49 U.S.C. 31315(b)(1), an exemption may be granted for no longer than two years from its approval date and may be renewed upon application for additional two year periods. In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, each of the 26 applicants has satisfied the entry conditions for obtaining an exemption from the vision requirements (65 FR 33406; 65 FR 57234; 67 FR 67234; 70 FR 7545; 68 FR 13360; 70 FR 12265; 65 FR 66286; 66 FR 13825; 68 FR 10300; 70 FR 14747; 65 FR 78256; 66 FR 16311; 67 FR 76439; 68 FR 10298; 68 FR 10301; 68 FR 19596; 70 FR 16886; 70 FR 2701; 70 FR 16887; 70 FR 17504; 70 FR 30997). Each of these 26 applicants has requested renewal of the exemption and has submitted evidence showing that the vision in the better eye continues to meet the standard specified at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10) and that the vision impairment is stable. In addition, a review of each record of safety while driving with the respective vision deficiencies over the past two years indicates each applicant continues to meet the vision exemption standards. These factors provide an adequate basis for predicting each driver's ability to continue to drive safely in interstate commerce. Therefore, FMCSA concludes that extending the exemption for each renewal applicant for a period of two years is likely to achieve a level of safety equal to that existing without the exemption. Request for Comments FMCSA will review comments received at any time concerning a particular driver's safety record and determine if the continuation of the exemption is consistent with the requirements at 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315. However, FMCSA requests that interested parties with specific data concerning the safety records of these drivers submit comments by June 15, 2007. FMCSA believes that the requirements for a renewal of an exemption under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 can be satisfied by initially granting the renewal and then requesting and evaluating, if needed, subsequent comments submitted by interested parties. As indicated above, the Agency previously published notices of final disposition announcing its decision to exempt these 26 individuals from the vision requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). The final decision to grant an exemption to each of these individuals was based on the merits of each case and only after careful consideration of the comments received to its notices of applications. The notices of applications stated in detail the qualifications, experience, and medical condition of each applicant for an exemption from the vision requirements. That information is available by consulting the above cited **Federal Register** publications. Interested parties or organizations possessing information that would otherwise show that any, or all of these drivers, are not currently achieving the statutory level of safety should immediately notify FMCSA. The Agency will evaluate any adverse evidence submitted and, if safety is being compromised or if continuation of the exemption would not be consistent with the goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA will take immediate steps to revoke the exemption of a driver. Issued on: May 9, 2007. Pamela M. Pelcovits, Acting Associate Administrator, Policy and Program Development. [FR Doc. E7-9338 Filed 5-15-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration [Docket No. FMCSA-2007-27387] Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Diabetes AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA). ACTION: Notice of applications for exemptions from the diabetes standard; request for comments. SUMMARY: FMCSA announces receipt of applications from 57 individuals for exemptions from the prohibition against persons with insulin-treated diabetes mellitus
(ITDM)operating commercial motor vehicles
(CMVs)in interstate commerce. If granted, the exemptions would enable these individuals with ITDM to operate CMVs in interstate commerce. DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 15, 2007. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Department of Transportation
(DOT)Docket Management System
(DMS)Docket Number FMCSA-2007-27387 using any of the following methods: • Web site: *http://dmses.dot.gov.* Follow the instructions for submitting comments on the DOT electronic docket site. • Fax: 1-202-493-2251. • Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, Room PL-401, Washington, DC 20590-0001. • Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays. • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to *http://www.regulations.gov.* Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. All submissions must include the Agency name and docket number for this Notice. Note that all comments received will be posted without change to *http://dms.dot.gov,* including any personal information provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading under Regulatory Notices. To read background documents or comments received, go to *http://dms.dot.gov* or to Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. *Docket:* For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to *http://dms.dot.gov* at any time or Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The DMS is available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. If you want acknowledgment that we received your comments, please include a self-addressed, stamped envelope or postcard or print the acknowledgement page that appears after submitting comments on-line. *Privacy Act:* Anyone may search the electronic form of all comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or of the person signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review the DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the **Federal Register** published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477; Apr. 11, 2000). This information is also available at *http://dms.dot.gov.* FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Mary D. Gunnels, Chief, Physical Qualifications Division,
(202)366-4001, *fmcsamedical@dot.gov,* FMCSA, Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Room 8301, Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption for a 2-year period if it finds “such exemption would likely achieve a level of safety that is equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be achieved absent such exemption.” The statute also allows the Agency to renew exemptions at the end of the 2-year period. The 57 individuals listed in this notice have recently requested an exemption from the diabetes prohibition in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3), which applies to drivers of CMVs in interstate commerce. Accordingly, the Agency will evaluate the qualifications of each applicant to determine whether granting the exemption will achieve the required level of safety mandated by the statute. Qualifications of Applicants Darrell L. Allen Mr. Allen, age 37, has had ITDM since 2004. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Allen meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His optometrist examined him in 2006 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A Commercial Driver's License
(CDL)from Missouri. Jeffery C. Badberg Mr. Badberg, 31, has had ITDM since 1980. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Badberg meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His ophthalmologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has stable nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class O operator's license from Nebraska, which allows him operate any non-commercial vehicle except motorcycles. Kevin W. Bender Mr. Bender, 23, has had ITDM since 2003. His endocrinologist examined him in 2007 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Bender meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His ophthalmologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class D operator's license from New York. Karry J. Benfiet Mr. Benfiet, 54, has had ITDM since 2006. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Benfiet meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His optometrist examined him in 2007 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from North Dakota. Ronnie T. Bledsoe Mr. Bledsoe, 37, has had ITDM since 1986. His endocrinologist examined him in 2007 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Bledsoe meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His optometrist examined him in 2007 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class C operator's license from North Carolina. Ricky N. Blankenship Mr. Blankenship, 48, has had ITDM since 2005. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Blankenship meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His optometrist examined him in 2006 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Utah. Kevin E. Blythe Mr. Blythe, 46, has had ITDM since 1989. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Blythe meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His ophthalmologist examined him in 2007 and certified that he has stable nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class B CDL from Arkansas. Clayton J. Bragg Mr. Bragg, 30, has had ITDM since 1989. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Bragg meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His ophthalmologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has stable nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. He holds an operator's license from Indiana, which allows him to drive any vehicle with a gross vehicle weight rating of 16,000 pounds or less, except motorcycles. James A. Broderick Mr. Broderick, 69, has had ITDM since 1970. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Broderick meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His optometrist examined him in 2006 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class B CDL from Montana. Clifford O. Bull Mr. Bull, 36, has had ITDM since 1995. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Bull meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His optometrist examined him in 2006 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class D operator's license from South Carolina. Richard M. Carey Mr. Carey, 46, has had ITDM since 1990. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Carey meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His ophthalmologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class C operator's license from North Carolina. Cary W. Chase Mr. Chase, 38, has had ITDM since 2006. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Chase meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His optometrist examined him in 2006 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class B CDL from Colorado. Robert L. Chestnut Mr. Chestnut, 68, has had ITDM since 2006. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Chestnut meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His ophthalmologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has stable nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Pennsylvania. Dino J. Coli, Jr. Mr. Coli, 53, has had ITDM since 2006. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Coli meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His ophthalmologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has stable nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class C operator's license from Oregon. Larry E. Colson Mr. Colson, 45, has had ITDM since 2006. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Colson meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His optometrist examined him in 2007 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Colorado. Elijah N. Craft Mr. Craft, 66, has had ITDM since 2006. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Craft meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His optometrist examined him in 2006 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Minnesota. Leonard Cunningham Mr. Cunningham, 56, has had ITDM since 2005. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Cunningham meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His ophthalmologist examined him in 2007 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class B operator's license from Maryland, which allows him to drive non-commercial vehicles and combinations weighing 26,001 or more pounds gross vehicle weight, except tractors, trailers, etc. LaVerne A. DeChausse Mr. DeChausse, 49, has had ITDM since 2005. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. DeChausse meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His optometrist examined him in 2006 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Illinois. Jason E. Earlywine Mr. Earlywine, 32, has had ITDM since 1976. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Earlywine meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His ophthalmologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has stable nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Kentucky. Eddie L. Edwards Mr. Edwards, 51, has had ITDM since 2005. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Edwards meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His optometrist examined him in 2006 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Illinois. Leroy Finn Mr. Finn, 66, has had ITDM since 2004. His endocrinologist examined him in 2007 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Finn meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His ophthalmologist examined him in 2007 and certified that he has stable nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Illinois. John E. Fitch Mr. Fitch, 52, has had ITDM since 1993. His endocrinologist examined him in 2007 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Fitch meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His optometrist examined him in 2007 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Michigan. Steven L. Garland Mr. Garland, 57, has had ITDM since childhood. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Garland meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His ophthalmologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has stable nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class E operator's license from Missouri, which allows him to drive any non-commercial combination of motor vehicles with a gross vehicle weight less than 26,001 pounds. William J. Gerlach Mr. Gerlach, 66, has had ITDM since 2005. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Gerlach meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His ophthalmologist examined him in 2007 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Ohio. Anthony Giulitto Mr. Giulitto, 38, has had ITDM since 2006. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Giulitto meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His optometrist examined him in 2006 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Arizona. Francis J. Godwin Mr. Godwin, 43, has had ITDM since 1992. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Godwin meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His ophthalmologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from New York. Ricky A. Goss Mr. Goss, 51, has had ITDM since 2002. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Goss meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His optometrist examined him in 2006 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class D operator's license from Ohio. Robert J. Guilford Mr. Guilford, 25, has had ITDM since 1990. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Guilford meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His ophthalmologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class B CDL from New York. Lucas C. Hansen Mr. Hansen, 29, has had ITDM since 1990. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Hansen meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His optometrist examined him in 2006 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Iowa. Ryan R. Harris Mr. Harris, 30, has had ITDM since 2005. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Harris meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His optometrist examined him in 2006 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Iowa. Dale R. Hass Mr. Hass, 56, has had ITDM since 2006. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Hass meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His ophthalmologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has stable nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Wisconsin. Robert P. Haught Mr. Haught, 38, has had ITDM since 1981. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Haught meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His ophthalmologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has stable proliferative diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class O operator's license from Michigan, which allows him to operate any motor vehicle except motorcycles and CMVs. Troy O. Heathcock Mr. Heathcock, 64, has had ITDM since 2000. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Heathcock meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His ophthalmologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has stable nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class B CDL from Michigan. Mark E. Hogmire Mr. Hogmire, 42, has had ITDM since 1993. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Hogmire meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His optometrist examined him in 2006 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class M operator's license from Virginia. Matthew P. Horner Mr. Horner, 31, has had ITDM since 2005. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Horner meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His optometrist examined him in 2006 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Pennsylvania. Scott D. Leland Mr. Leland, 45, has had ITDM since 1972. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Leland meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His optometrist examined him in 2006 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class D operator's license from Arizona. Dennis R. Mace Mr. Mace, 61 has had ITDM since 2006. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Mace meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His optometrist examined him in 2006 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Pennsylvania. Elizabeth A. Marsh Ms. Marsh, 55, has had ITDM since 2006. Her endocrinologist examined her in 2006 and certified that she has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of her diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Ms. Marsh meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). Her optometrist examined her in 2006 and certified that she does not have diabetic retinopathy. She holds a Class A CDL from Alabama. Peggy A. Myers Ms. Myers, 39, has had ITDM since 1988. Her endocrinologist examined her in 2006 and certified that she has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of her diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Ms. Myers meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). Her optometrist examined her in 2006 and certified that she does not have diabetic retinopathy. She holds an operator's license from Indiana, which allows her to drive any vehicle with a gross vehicle weight rating of 16,000 pounds or less, except motorcycles. Frank C. Perrin Mr. Perrin, 37, has had ITDM since 1997. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Perrin meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His ophthalmologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Iowa. Herbert A. Pierce Mr. Pierce, 40, has had ITDM since 2000. His endocrinologist examined him in 2007 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Pierce meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His optometrist examined him in 2006 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class D operator's license from Ohio. Douglas F. Reinke Mr. Reinke, 55, has had ITDM since 1990. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Reinke meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His ophthalmologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has stable nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Wisconsin. Carlos Rosa Mr. Rosa, 43, has had ITDM since 2003. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Rosa meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His ophthalmologist examined him in 2007 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class B CDL from Connecticut. Nicholas F. Santacroce Mr. Santacroce, 46, has had ITDM since 1991. His endocrinologist examined him in 2007 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Santacroce meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His ophthalmologist examined him in 2007 and certified that he has stable nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class D operator's license from Massachusetts. Timothy S. Seitz Mr. Seitz, 51, has had ITDM since 2006. His endocrinologist examined him in 2007 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Seitz meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His optometrist examined him in 2007 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Indiana. Steven J. Shaw Mr. Shaw, 24, has had ITDM since 2006. His endocrinologist examined him in 2007 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Shaw meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His optometrist examined him in 2006 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Idaho. Donna B. Shehan Ms. Shehan, 39, has had ITDM since 2006. Her endocrinologist examined her in 2006 and certified that she has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of her diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Ms. Shehan meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). Her ophthalmologist examined her in 2006 and certified that she does not have diabetic retinopathy. She holds a Class D CDL from South Carolina. Kenneth J. Shifton Mr. Shifton, 56, has had ITDM since February, 2006. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Shifton meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His optometrist examined him in 2006 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Oregon. Rick G. Skonberg Mr. Skonberg, 52, has had ITDM since 1995. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Skonberg meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His ophthalmologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has stable nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Alaska. Stephanie B. Smith Ms. Smith, 39, has had ITDM since 2006. Her endocrinologist examined her in 2006 and certified that she has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of her diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Ms. Smith meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). Her ophthalmologist examined her in 2006 and certified that she does not have diabetic retinopathy. She holds a Class B CDL from Washington. Earl C. Smouse Mr. Smouse, 49, has had ITDM since 2004. His endocrinologist examined him in 2007 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Smouse meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His ophthalmologist examined him in 2007 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class B CDL from Texas. Randall J. Stoller Mr. Stoller, 50, has had ITDM since 1987. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Stoller meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His optometrist examined him in 2006 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Illinois. Peter A. Storm Mr. Storm, 30, has had ITDM since 2006. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Storm meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His optometrist examined him in 2006 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class D chauffeur's license from Louisiana. Robert H. Thompson, Jr. Mr. Thompson, 38, has had ITDM since 1994. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Thompson meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His ophthalmologist examined him in 2007 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class E operator's license from Louisiana, which allows him to operate any single motor vehicle under 10,000 pounds gross vehicle weight, any personal use recreational vehicle, and farm vehicles controlled and operated by a farmer. Robert D. Toland Mr. Toland, 50, has had ITDM since 1995. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Toland meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His ophthalmologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Illinois. Mark A. Webber Mr. Webber, 46, has had ITDM since 2005. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Webber meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His optometrist examined him in 2006 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class D operator's license from Minnesota. Jeffrey A. Withers Mr. Withers, 39, has had ITDM since 2004. His endocrinologist examined him in 2006 and certified that he has had no hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years; understands diabetes management and monitoring; and has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Withers meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His optometrist examined him in 2006 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Michigan. Request for Comments In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA requests public comment from all interested persons on the exemption petitions described in this notice. We will consider all comments received before the close of business on the closing date indicated earlier in the Notice. FMCSA notes that Section 4129 of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible and Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) requires the Secretary to revise its diabetes exemption program established on September 3, 2003 (68 FR 52441). 1 The revision must provide for individual assessment of drivers with diabetes mellitus, and be consistent with the criteria described in section 4018 of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (49 U.S.C. 31305). 1 Section 4129(a) refers to the 2003 Notice as a “final rule.” However, the 2003 Notice did not issue a “final rule,” but did establish the procedures and standards for issuing exemptions for drivers with ITDM. Section 4129 requires:
(1)The elimination of the requirement for three years of experience operating CMVs while being treated with insulin; and
(2)the establishment of a specified minimum period of insulin use to demonstrate stable control of diabetes before being allowed to operate a CMV. In response to section 4129, FMCSA made immediate revisions to the diabetes exemption program established by the September 3, 2003. Notice. FMCSA discontinued use of the 3-year driving experience and fulfilled the requirements of section 4129 while continuing to ensure that operation of CMVs by drivers with ITDM will achieve the requisite level of safety required of all exemptions granted under 49 U.S.C. 31136 (e). Section 4129(d) also directed FMCSA to ensure that drivers of CMVs with ITDM are not held to a higher standard than other drivers, with the exception of limited operating, monitoring and medical requirements that are deemed medically necessary. FMCSA concluded that all of the operating, monitoring and medical requirements set out in the September 3, 2003 Notice, except as modified, were in compliance with section 4129(d). Therefore, all of the requirements set out in the September 3, 2003 Notice, except as modified in the Notice in the **Federal Register** on November 8, 2005 (70 FR 67777), remain in effect. Issued on: May 9, 2007. Pamela M. Pelcovits, Acting Associate Administrator, Policy and Program Development. [FR Doc. E7-9339 Filed 5-15-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service Open Meeting of the Small Business/Self Employed—Taxpayer Burden Reduction Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service
(IRS)Treasury. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Small Business/Self Employed—Taxpayer Burden Reduction Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted in San Diego, California. The TAP will be discussing issues pertaining to increasing compliance and lessening the burden for Small Business/Self Employed individuals. DATES: The meeting will be held Friday, June 8 and Saturday, June, 9, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marisa Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3557. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App.
(1988)that an open meeting of the Small Business/Self Employed—Taxpayer Burden Reduction Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Friday, June 8, 2007 from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. and Saturday, June 9, 2007 from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. PDT at the Hilton San Diego Airport Hotel located at 1960 Harbor Island Drive, San Diego, CA 92101. Individual comments are welcomed and limited to 5 minutes per person. For more information and to confirm attendance, notification of intent to attend the meeting must be made with Marisa Knispel. Mrs. Knispel may be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3557. If you would like to have the TAP consider a written statement, please write to Marisa Knispel, TAP Office, 10 Metro Tech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or you may post your comments to the Web site: *http://www.improveirs.org* . The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues. Dated: May 9, 2007. John Fay, Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel. [FR Doc. E7-9343 Filed 5-15-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4830-01-P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY U.S. Customs and Border Protection Automated Commercial Environment (ACE): Terms and Conditions for Account Access of the ACE Secure Data Portal AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection; Department of Homeland Security. ACTION: General notice. SUMMARY: This notice sets forth a revision of the terms and conditions that must be followed as a condition for access to the Automated Commercial Environment
(ACE)Secure Data Portal (ACE Portal). These terms and conditions supersede and replace the Terms and Conditions documents previously signed and submitted to U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP)by ACE Portal Account Owners. The previous Terms and Conditions documents were not published in any public document but were provided to ACE Portal Account applicants after their acceptance into the test. For those ACE Portal Accounts already on file with CBP with the proper Account Owner listed, no further action is required by the ACE Portal Account Owner. The principal changes to the terms and conditions include a revised definition of “Account Owner” to permit either an individual or a legal entity to serve in this capacity, new requirements relating to providing notice to CBP when there has been a material change in the status of the Account and/or Account Owner, and explanatory provisions as to how the information from a particular account may be accessed through the ACE Portal when that account is transferred to a new owner. These terms and conditions do not affect participants in ACE who have not established Portal Accounts but who do participate via less formal Non-portal Accounts. EFFECTIVE DATES: The terms and conditions set forth in this document must be followed as a condition for access to the ACE Portal effective immediately. ADDRESSES: Comments concerning this notice should be submitted to Michael Maricich via e-mail at *CSPO@dhs.gov.* FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Operational aspects for importers and brokers: Ruthanne Kenneally
(202)863-6064. Operational aspects for carriers: James Swanson at *james.d.swanson@dhs.gov.* Systems or automation aspects: Michael Maricich at *michael.maricich@dhs.gov* . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On May 1, 2002, the former U.S. Customs Service, now U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), published a General Notice in the **Federal Register** (67 FR 21800) announcing a plan to conduct a National Customs Automation Program
(NCAP)test of the first phase of the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE). The test was described as the first step toward the full electronic processing of commercial importations with a focus on defining and establishing an importer's account structure. This General Notice announced that importers and authorized parties would be allowed to access their customs data via a web-based Account Portal. The notice set forth eligibility criteria for companies interested in establishing accounts (commonly known as Portal Accounts) accessible through the ACE Portal, and limited participants in the ACE test to importers already participating in the Customs Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT) Program who had access to the Internet. Upon an applicant's selection into the test, Customs would require additional information for inclusion in the account profile. Certain subsequent notices eliminated the requirement of participation in the C-TPAT Program ( *see, e.g.* , General Notice published in the **Federal Register** on February 1, 2005 (70 FR 5199)) and expanded the universe of eligible participants in the ACE test and the types of ACE Portal Accounts, while establishing guidelines for account management, as described below. On February 4, 2004, CBP published two General Notices in the **Federal Register** , which established the ACE Truck Carrier Accounts and opened the application period for authorized importers and their designated brokers to participate in the NCAP test to implement the Periodic Monthly Statement
(PMS)process ( *see* 69 FR 5360 and 69 FR 5362, respectively). Brokers were invited to establish Broker Accounts in ACE in order to participate in the NCAP test to implement PMS. In both February 4, 2004, General Notices, CBP advised participants that they could designate only one person as the Account Owner for the company's ACE Portal account. The Account Owner was identified as the party responsible for safeguarding the company's ACE Portal account information, controlling all disclosures of that information to authorized persons, authorizing user access to the ACE Portal account information, and ensuring the strict control of access by authorized persons to the ACE Portal information. On September 8, 2004, CBP published a General Notice in the **Federal Register** (69 FR 54302) inviting customs brokers to participate in the ACE Portal test generally and informing interested parties that once they had been notified by CBP that their request to participate in the ACE Portal test had been accepted, they would be asked to sign and submit a Terms and Conditions document. CBP subsequently contacted those participants and asked them to also sign and submit a Power of Attorney form and an Additional Account/Account Owner Information form. Non-Portal Accounts CBP has also enabled certain parties to participate in any ACE test without establishing ACE Portal accounts. On October 24, 2005, CBP published a General Notice in the **Federal Register** (70 FR 61466) announcing that importers, whether or not C-TPAT certified, could become ACE non-portal accounts and participate in the PMS test, under certain conditions. Additionally, on March 29, 2006, CBP published another General Notice in the **Federal Register** (71 FR 15756) announcing that truck carriers who do not have ACE Truck Carrier Accounts may use third parties to transmit truck manifest information on their behalf electronically in the ACE Truck Manifest system, via EDI messaging. Parties choosing to participate in any ACE test without an ACE Portal account, such as those identified here and any others that CBP may identify in the future, are not bound by the Terms and Conditions described below. Terms and Conditions Document The purpose of the Terms and Conditions document that participants were asked to sign was to set forth the obligations and responsibilities of those parties accessing an ACE Portal account on behalf of an Account. An ACE Portal account, as employed in that document, referred to a party who had volunteered to participate in any ACE test and had an ACE Portal account. Presently, ACE Portal accounts may be established by any of the following business categories meeting the below listed eligibility requirements: 1. Importer: • Possesses one or more Importer of Record (“IR”) numbers; and • Has access to the Internet ( *see* 67 FR 21800, May 1, 2002) 2. Broker: • Possesses the ability to make periodic payment via ACH Credit or ACH Debit; • Possesses the ability to file entry/entry summary via ABI (Automated Broker Interface); and • Has access to the Internet ( *see* 69 FR 5362, February 4, 2004) 3. Carrier: • Possesses a Standard Carrier Alpha Code (SCAC); and • Has access to the Internet ( *see* 69 FR 5360, February 4, 2004) To date, CBP has required that the Account Owner sign and submit the Terms and Conditions document prior to accessing the ACE Portal. If the Terms and Conditions document was not signed and submitted to CBP, CBP would deny access to the ACE Portal for the Account Owner. The trade community has provided numerous comments to CBP describing the burdens imposed by the requirement that the Account Owner sign and submit the Terms and Conditions document prior to accessing the ACE Portal. In response, CBP is publishing the terms and conditions governing ACE Portal access in this **Federal Register** Notice (FRN). The publication of the terms and conditions in this FRN replaces the requirement that the Account Owner sign and submit a Terms and Conditions document to CBP. Changes in Policy Any Terms and Conditions document previously signed and submitted by any Account Owner is null and void, having been superseded and replaced by the Terms and Conditions set forth in this FRN. Any present ACE Portal account with a Terms and Conditions document already on file with CBP will not be required to change the designation of its Account Owners unless the Account would prefer to designate a new Account Owner, consistent with the definition of Account Owner that is set forth below. If the Account chooses to change its Account Owner designation, the Account will be required to sign and submit to CBP an Account Owner Designation/Authorization form. The Terms and Conditions set forth in this FRN will appear on the introductory screen for the ACE Portal. Any party seeking access to the ACE Portal will be required to accept those Terms and Conditions as set forth on the screen and in this FRN. As ACE expands and includes other portal account types beyond the importer, broker and carrier ACE Portal accounts that exist today, further modifications to the Terms and Conditions may occur. New Definition of Account Owner With the publication of this FRN, CBP is also amending the requirements set forth in the General Notices published on February 4, 2004 (and referenced above) pertaining to the designation of the “Account Owner.” Specifically, those notices limited the participants to the designation of only one person as the Account Owner who would be responsible for the company's portal account information. The Terms and Conditions documents presently on file with CBP define the Account Owner as “any individual identified and authorized by the Account to serve as the representative of the Account relating to the administration of access to the Account's information through the ACE Portal.” Upon review, CBP is revising the definition of “Account Owner.” This revised definition of the Account Owner supersedes and replaces any former definition for the Account Owner. Whereas the former definition of Account Owner referred to a *person* or *individual,* CBP has now determined that a more appropriate definition for the Account Owner includes any “legal entity” identified and authorized by the Account to serve as the representative of that Account relating to the administration of access to the Account's information through the ACE Portal. Accordingly, the Account may also choose to designate itself to be its own Account Owner. The revisions of the Terms and Conditions set forth in this FRN include additional requirements, specifically those which require notice to CBP when there has been a material change in the status of the Account and/or Account Owner, as well as access to historical information in the event of the transfer of control of an IR number, filer code, or SCAC. Terms and Conditions I. Overview This document sets forth the obligations and responsibilities that must be followed as a condition for access to the Automated Commercial Environment (“ACE”) Secure Data Portal (hereinafter, “ACE Portal”). Information contained in ACE and accessed through the ACE Portal includes confidential commercial or financial information that pertains to the Account. Information in ACE is, generally, protected under the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552), the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a), and the Trade Secrets Act (18 U.S.C. 1905). No private party will be permitted access to information pertaining to an account absent the authorization of the Account. No governmental agency outside of the Department of Homeland Security will be permitted access to information that pertains to an account, unless the access is otherwise authorized by law ( *e.g.* , Freedom of Information Act, Privacy Act, Trade Secrets Act, etc.). Information accessed through the ACE Portal that derives from another Agency of the United States Government is subject to the “Third Party Rule,” which separately requires the approval of that other agency before the information may be disseminated beyond the Account Owner and any Account User. CBP reserves the right to monitor access to the ACE Portal. CBP also reserves the right to disapprove any authorization of access to the ACE Portal for reasons pertaining to the security of ACE, mission of CBP, or National Security. The fact that one participates in the ACE test is not confidential. II. Account The term “Account” as employed in this document refers to a business entity that has volunteered to participate in an ACE test. The Account may designate only one Account Owner for the Account. III. Account Roles The Account Owner is any individual or other legal entity identified and authorized by the Account to serve as the representative of the Account and is responsible for the administration of access to the Account's information through the ACE Portal. If the Account chooses to designate a legal entity other than an individual as the Account Owner, the Account Owner must also designate an individual as the single point of contact for the Account. In all cases, there must be a single individual who is responsible for the administration of access to the Account's information through the ACE Portal. A Proxy Account Owner is any individual identified and authorized by either the Account or the Account Owner to access information that pertains to the Account through the ACE Portal. The authority of the Proxy Account Owner includes the designation of other Account Users, but may be limited by the Account Owner. In no case may a Proxy Account Owner designate other Proxy Account Owners. An Account User is any individual identified and authorized by the Account Owner or Proxy Account Owner to access information that pertains to the Account through the ACE Portal. IV. Responsibilities A. The Account 1. The Account must separately authorize the Account Owner to exercise any and all authority, apparent or otherwise, to fulfill the enumerated responsibilities contained herein and in any applicable **Federal Register** Notice, including the authority to access and control information associated with newly acquired IR number(s), SCAC(s), and/or filer code(s). 2. The Account must complete and submit to CBP the Account Owner Designation/Authorization form, located on the CBP website ( * http:// www.cbp.gov * ) as proof of designation of the Account Owner. This document must be signed by both the Account and the Account Owner and submitted to the Account Administrator. In cases in which the Account Owner is an entity, the form must be signed by the single point of contact of the Account. B. Account Owner 1. The Account Owner, as the representative of the Account with respect to all information submitted by or on behalf of the Account, is responsible for safeguarding Account information, authorizing user access to the ACE Portal account information, controlling all disclosures of that information, enforcing ACE Portal access limitations, and ensuring the strict control of access by authorized persons to the ACE Portal information. 2. The Account Owner assumes liability for any disclosure of Account information or unauthorized access to the ACE Portal and holds CBP, its officers, agents, and employees harmless from the release of any such information. 3. The Account Owner administers and controls all Proxy Account Owners and Account User access, including the designation and limitation of access, to the ACE Portal. The Account Owner is authorized to grant full or limited access to information relating to the Account (including information protected by the Trade Secrets Act or Privacy Act), through the ACE Portal. 4. The Account Owner, if not an individual, shall designate an individual as the single point of contact for the Account relating to the administration of access to the Account's information through the ACE Portal. C. All Parties The Account Owner, Proxy Account Owner, and any Account Users are responsible for ensuring the accuracy and confidentiality of any information they submit through the ACE Portal to CBP, and are also responsible for complying with the record-keeping requirements in accordance with law including, but not limited to, 19 U.S.C. 1508 and 1509. V. Failure To Access the Portal The failure of an Account Owner to access the ACE Portal for a period of ninety
(90)days, consecutively, will result in the termination of access to the ACE Portal. Access may be restored by calling the Help Desk or by following the “forgot your password” prompt found on the ACE Portal log-in page. The failure of a Proxy Account Owner or an Account User to access the ACE Portal for a period of ninety
(90)days, consecutively, will result in the termination of access to the ACE Portal for the Proxy Account Owner or Account User. Access may only be restored upon re-authorization by the Account Owner. VI. Change in the Status of the Account or Account Owner A. Change in the Status of the Account 1. The Account must provide notice to CBP as soon as practicable, relating to a material change to the status or condition of the Account, such as a transfer of IR number(s), SCAC(s), or filer codes(s). Any transfer of control of an IR number, SCAC or filer code, will require notification to the CBP assigned Account Manager or the ACE Portal Administrator by the acquiring and acquired parties. Until such notification, CBP will not alter access to the Portal. Some material changes will also require re-application. For example, any reorganization of an Account resulting in the creation of a new company and a new IR number, SCAC or filer code, will require re-application; this does not include the addition of a subsidiary. In the event of a division or spin-off from an Account, the Account will retain access to the ACE Portal, and the new business entity formed from the division or spin-off must apply for access. 2. In the event of a material change in the status of the Account, such as the transfer of IR number(s), SCAC(s), or filer codes(s), CBP will require a brief summary of the change, signed by both the acquiring and acquired parties, including, but not limited to, the following information: a. Company names; b. IR numbers acquired, transferred, sold, or divested; c. Party transferring the IR number, filer code, and/or SCAC; d. Party acquiring the IR number, filer code, and/or SCAC; e. Address changes; and f. Effective date of information control. 3. When the CBP assigned Account Manager or ACE Portal Administrator is notified of the transfer of IR number(s), SCAC(s) or filer code(s), ACE Portal access will be denied for the acquired company unless the acquiring company authorizes access to the acquired company. B. Change in the Status of the Account Owner 1. The Account must provide notice to CBP, as soon as practicable, relating to a material change in the status of the Account Owner. A material change includes the resignation of the Account Owner. The Account must designate a new Account Owner to act on behalf of the Account after notifying CBP of the change. At such time that a new Account Owner is designated for the Account, the Account must submit a new Account Owner Designation/Authorization form to the CBP assigned Account Manager or Portal Administrator. 2. If the Account Owner is not an individual, the Account Owner must provide notice to CBP, as soon as practicable, relating to a material change to the status of the single point of contact. At such time that a new single point of contact is designated for the Account Owner, the Account Owner must submit a new Account Owner Designation/Authorization form to the CBP assigned Account Manager or Portal Administrator. VII. Access to Historical Information In the event of a transfer of control of an IR number, filer code, and/or SCAC, the acquiring company will obtain access to historical information associated with that IR number, filer code, and/or SCAC. In the event that the acquired company also requires access to the historical information associated with the transfer of control of an IR number, filer code, and/or SCAC, the acquired company's access to that information may be obtained by either downloading the historical information prior to the date of sale or the transfer of control of an IR number, filer code, and/or SCAC, or by making a Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA)request to CBP of a download of that information after the sale or the transfer of control of an IR number, filer code, and/or SCAC. In the alternative, the acquired company may request to be made a user on the acquiring company's Account. Dated: May 9, 2007. Jayson P. Ahern, Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations. [FR Doc. E7-9350 Filed 5-15-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9111-14-P DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Clinical Science Research and Development Service Cooperative Studies Scientific Merit Review Board; Notice of Meeting The Department of Veterans Affairs
(VA)gives notice under Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that a meeting of the Clinical Science Research and Development Service Cooperative Studies Scientific Merit Review Board will be held on June 13, 2007, in the Capitol Room 5th Floor at the International Square Center, 1875 I Street NW., Washington, DC. The meeting is scheduled to begin at 8:30 a.m. and end at 4 p.m. The Board advises the Chief Research and Development Officer through the Director of the Clinical Science Research and Development Service on the relevance and feasibility of proposed studies, the adequacy of the protocols and the scientific validity and propriety of technical details, including protection of human subjects. The session will be open to the public from 8:30 a.m. to 9 a.m. for the discussion of administrative matters and the general status of the program. The session will be closed from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. for the Board's review of research and development applications. During the closed portion of the meeting, discussions and recommendations will deal with qualifications of personnel conducting the studies, staff and consultant critiques of research proposals and similar documents, and the medical records of patients who are study subjects, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. As provided by section 10(d) of Public Law 92-463, as amended, closing portions of this meeting is in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6) and (c)(9)(B). Those who plan to attend should contact Dr. Grant Huang, Deputy Director, Cooperative Studies Program (125), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420 at
(202)254-0183. Dated: May 9, 2007. By direction of the Secretary. E. Philip Riggin, Committee Management Officer. [FR Doc. 07-2395 Filed 5-15-07; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 12
12 references not yet in our index
  • 42 USC 4321-4351
  • 42 USC 7401-7671(q)
  • 16 USC 1531-1544
  • 16 USC 703-712
  • 42 USC 2000
  • 7 USC 4201-4209
  • 33 USC 1251-1377
  • 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10)
  • 49 CFR 381
  • 49 CFR 391.41
  • 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3)
  • Pub. L. 92-463
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Notice of Limitation on Claims for Judicial Review of Actions by FHWA and other Federal Agencies
U.S.C.§ 139
U.S.C.§ 109
U.S.C.§ 470
Fed. Reg.Notices
U.S.C.§ 31136
U.S.C.§ 31315
U.S.C.§ 31305
U.S.C.§ 552
U.S.C.§ 552a
Cite42 USC 4321-4351
Cite42 USC 7401-7671(q)
Cite16 USC 1531-1544
Cites 24 · showing 12Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.