Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2007-04-27 · National Park Service · Notices

Notices. Notice

4,706 words·~21 min read·/register/2007/04/27/07-2076·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4312-53-M DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service Notice of Establishment of the Sand Creek Massacre National Historic Site AGENCY: National Park Service. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: Under Public Law 106-465, the Sand Creek Massacre Site Establishment Act of 2000, the Secretary of the Interior hereby announces that sufficient lands have been acquired to establish the Sand Creek Massacre National Historic Site in Kiowa County, Colorado. Public Law 106-465 called for the Secretary of the Interior to establish the Sand Creek Massacre National Historic Site once the Secretary had determined that sufficient lands had been acquired by the federal government to provide for the preservation, memorialization, commemoration, and interpretation of the Sand Creek Massacre.
The Act authorized the National Park Service to acquire up to 12,500 acres from willing sellers for this purpose. Between 2002 and 2004 the United States acquired 920 acres within the authorized boundaries. On September 9, 2006, pursuant to Public Law 109-45, the Sand Creek Massacre National Historic Site Trust Act of 2005, the Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma conveyed to the United States title to 1465 acres within the authorized boundaries to be held in trust for the purposes of the Sand Creek Massacre National Historic Site.
With this conveyance, the United States has acquired a sufficient amount of the nationally significant resources that are integral to the preservation, commemoration and interpretation of the Sand Creek Massacre. DATES: This action is effective April 27, 2007. ADDRESSES: Requests for information should be sent to Sand Creek Massacre National Historic Site. P.O. Box 249, Eads, Colorado 81036. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alexa Roberts, Superintendent, Sand Creek Massacre National Historic Site.
P.O. Box 249, Eads, Colorado, 81036. Dated: April 23, 2007. Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary. [FR Doc. E7-8057 Filed 4-26-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310-70-P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337-TA-601] Certain 3g Wideband Code Division Multiple Access (WCDMA) Handsets and Components Thereof; Notice of Investigation AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on March 23, 2007, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of InterDigital Communications Corporation of King of Prussia, Pennsylvania and InterDigital Technology Corporation of Wilmington, Delaware. Letters supplementing the complaint were filed on April 4, 2007 and April 16, 2007. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain 3G Wideband Code Division Multiple Access (WCDMA) handsets and components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent Nos. 7,117,004, 6,674,791, and 6,973,579. The complaint, as supplemented, further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainants request that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a permanent exclusion order and a permanent cease and desist order. ADDRESSES: The complaint, as supplemented, except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at *http://www.usitc.gov* .
The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket
(EDIS)at *http://www.usitc.gov/secretary/edis.htm* . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David O. Lloyd, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone
(202)205-2576. Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2006). *Scope of Investigation:* Having considered amended complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on April 20, 2007, ORDERED THAT—
(1)Pursuant to subsection
(b)of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain 3G Wideband Code Division Multiple Access (WCDMA) handsets and components thereof by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1, 2, 7-10, 14, 15, 21, 22, 24, 30-32, 34, 35, 46, 47, 49, 59, and 60 of U.S. Patent No. 7,117,004; claims 7 and 10 of U.S. Patent No. 6,674,791; and claims 1-4 of U.S. Patent No. 6,973,579; and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2)For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served:
(a)The complainants are— InterDigital Communications Corporation, 781 Third Avenue, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406. InterDigital Technology Corporation, Hagley Building, Suite 105, 3411 Silverside Road, Concord Plaza, Wilmington, Delaware 19810.
(b)The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Main Building, 250, Taepyung-ro 2-ka, Chung-ku, Seoul 100-742 Korea. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 105 Challenger Road, Ridgefield Park, New Jersey 07660. Samsung Telecommunications America LLC, 1301 Lookout Drive, Richardson, Texas 75082.
(c)The Commission investigative attorney, party to this investigation, is David O. Lloyd, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 401-M, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3)For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Paul J. Luckern is designated as the presiding administrative law judge. Responses to the complaint, as supplemented, and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint, as supplemented, and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint, as supplemented, and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint, as supplemented, and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint, as supplemented, and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint, as supplemented, and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of a limited exclusion order or cease and desist order or both directed against a respondent. By order of the Commission. Issued: April 20, 2007. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E7-8052 Filed 4-26-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020-02-P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337-TA-543] Certain Baseband Processor Chips and Chipsets, Transmitter and Receiver (Radio) Chips, Power Control Chips, and Products Containing Same, Including Cellular Telephone Handsets; Notice of Commission Decision To Extend the Target Date for Completion of the Investigation AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to further extend the target date for completion of the above-captioned investigation by seventeen
(17)days to May 25, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-3152. Copies of the ID and all other nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server ( *http://www.usitc.gov* ). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket
(EDIS)at *http://edis.usitc.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 21, 2005, the Commission instituted an investigation under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based on a complaint filed by Broadcom Corporation of Irvine, California, alleging a violation of section 337 in the importation, sale for importation, and sale within the United States after importation of certain baseband processor chips and chipsets, transmitter and receiver (radio) chips, power control chips, and products containing same, including cellular telephone handsets by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,374,311; 6,714,983; 6,583,675; 5,682,379 (“the `379 patent”); and 6,359,872 (“the `872 patent”). 70 *Fed. Reg.* 35707 (June 21, 2005). The complainant named Qualcomm Incorporated of San Diego, California (“Qualcomm”) as the only respondent. The `379 patent and `872 patent have been terminated from this investigation. On October 19, 2006, the presiding administrative law judge (“ALJ”) issued an Initial Determination (“ID”) on Violation of Section 337 and Recommended Determination (“RD”) on Remedy and Bond, finding a violation of section 337. The ID found a violation of section 337, and the RD recommended a limited exclusion order directed to baseband processor chips imported by Qualcomm. On December 8, 2006, the Commission issued a notice of its decision to review and upon review to modify in part the ALJ's final ID. The modification made by the Commission did not change the finding of violation. The Commission also requested the parties to the investigation, interested Government agencies, and any other interested persons to file written submissions on the issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding. On January 25, 2007, respondent Qualcomm moved, *inter alia,* for oral argument and hearing on the issues of remedy and the public interest. On March 21-22, 2007, the Commission held a public hearing on the issues of remedy and the public interest. The Commission has determined to extend the target date for completion of this investigation by seventeen
(17)days to May 25, 2007. The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.51(h) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.51)). By order of the Commission. Issued: April 23, 2007. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E7-8051 Filed 4-26-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020-02-P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337-TA-600] Certain Rechargeable Lithium-Ion Batteries, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of Investigation AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on March 7, 2007, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of 3M Company and 3M Innovative Properties Company of St. Paul, Minnesota. A letter supplementing the complaint was filed on March 27, 2007. On April 11, 2007, the complainants filed an amended complaint. A letter supplementing the amended complaint was filed on April 17, 2007. The amended complaint alleges violations of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain rechargeable lithium-ion batteries, components thereof, and products containing same by reason of infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,964,828 and 7,078,128. The amended complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainants request that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a permanent exclusion order and permanent cease and desist orders. ADDRESSES: The amended complaint and supplement, except for any confidential information contained therein, are available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at *http://www.usitc.gov* . The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket
(EDIS)at *http://www.usitc.gov/secretary/edis.htm* . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rett Snotherly, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone
(202)205-2599. *Authority:* The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2006). *Scope Of Investigation:* Having considered the amended complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on April 20, 2007, ORDERED THAT—
(1)Pursuant to subsection
(b)of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain rechargeable lithium-ion batteries, components thereof, or products containing same by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1, 2, 13, and 15-19 of U.S. Patent No. 6,964,828 and claims 10, 15, 16, and 22 of U.S. Patent No. 7,078,128, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2)For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served:
(a)The complainants are— 3M Company, 3M Center, St. Paul, Minnesota 55144. 3M Innovative Properties Company, 3M Center, St. Paul, Minnesota 55144.
(b)The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the amended complaint is to be served: Sony Corporation, 7-35 Kitashinagawa, 6-Chome Shinagawa-KU, Tokyo 141 Japan. Sony Electronics, Inc., 16450 W. Bernardo Dr., San Diego, CA 92127. Lenovo Group Limited (Hong Kong), 23rd Floor, Lincoln House, Taikoo Place, 979 King's Road, Quarry Bay, Hong Kong. Lenovo (United States) Inc., 5241 Paramount Pkwy, Morrisville, NC 27560. CDW Corporation, 200 N. Milwaukee Ave., Vernon Hills, IL 60061. Batteries Com, LLC, 6040 W. 79th Street, Indianapolis, IN 46278-1727. Hitachi Koki USA, Ltd., 3950 Steve Reynolds Blvd., Norcross, GA 30093. Matsushita Industrial Electric Co., Ltd. 1006, Kadoma, Kadoma, OSK 571-0050 Japan. Panasonic Corporation of North America, 1 Panasonic Way, Panazip 1F-6, Secaucus, NJ 07094. Total Micro Technologies, Inc., 17791 Mitchell N, Irvine, CA 92614. Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd, 5-5 Keihan-Hondori, 2-chome, Moriguchi, Osaka 570-8677, Japan.
(c)The Commission investigative attorney, party to this investigation, is Rett Snotherly, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3)For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Charles E. Bullock is designated as the presiding administrative law judge. Responses to the amended complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the amended complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the amended complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the amended complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the amended complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the amended complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of a limited exclusion order or cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. By order of the Commission. Issued: April 20, 2007. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E7-8053 Filed 4-26-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020-02-P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [OMB Number 1105-NEW] National Drug Intelligence Center; Agency Information Collection Activities: New Collection; Comments Requested ACTION: 60-Day Notice of Information Collection Under Review: New Collection SENTRY/Emerging Drug Tracking System The United States Department of Justice (DOJ), National Drug Intelligence Center (NDIC), will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB)for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for “sixty days” until June 26, 2007. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. If you have comments especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact Thomas Padden, Chief Counsel, National Drug Intelligence Center, Fifth Floor, 319 Washington Street, Johnstown, PA 15901. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: —Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; —Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; —Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and —Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, *e.g.* , permitting electronic submission of responses. *Overview of this information collection:*
(1)*Type of Information Collection:* New Collection.
(2)*Title of the Form/Collection:* SENTRY/Emerging Drug Tracking System, a drug early warning and response system.
(3)*Agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the Department of Justice sponsoring the collection:* Not Applicable.
(4)The 2004 National Synthetic Drugs Action Plan designated NDIC the lead agency for developing an early warning and response system. This instrument is critical for NDIC to detect emerging drug abuse and production trends and thereafter notify law enforcement demand authorities and prepared associated reports. Respondents will be authorized state and local law enforcement officers, and treatment/education/medical service providers.
(5)*An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time estimated for an average respondent to respond:* It is estimated that during the first year 300 respondents will submit a tip requiring approximately 15 minutes. Use of the system is expected to increase significantly.
(6)*An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the collection:* There are an estimated 75 total annual burden hours associated with this collection. *If additional information is required contact:* Ms. Lynn Bryant, Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Patrick Henry Building, Suite 1600, 601 D Street, NW., Washington, DC 20530. Dated: April 23, 2007. Lynn Bryant, Department Clearance Officer, PRA, Department of Justice. [FR Doc. E7-8086 Filed 4-26-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-DC-P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives [OMB Number 1140-0053] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comments Requested ACTION: 60-Day Notice of Information Collection Under Review: Training Registration Request for Non-ATF Employees. The Department of Justice (DOJ), Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB)for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for “sixty days” until June 26, 2007. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. If you have comments especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact Jim Scott, Learning Systems Management Division, 800 K Street, NW., Suite 600, Washington, DC 20091. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: —Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; —Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; —Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and —Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, *e.g.* , permitting electronic submission of responses. *Overview of this information collection:*
(1)*Type of Information Collection:* Extension of a currently approved collection.
(2)*Title of the Form/Collection:* Training Registration Request for Non-ATF Employees.
(3)*Agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the Department of Justice sponsoring the collection: Form Number:* ATF F 6400.1. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.
(4)*Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract:* *Primary:* State, Local, or Tribal Government. *Other:* None. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives provides arson and explosives investigative techniques training to State and local investigators. The registration request form will be used by prospective students.
(5)*An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time estimated for an average respondent to respond:* It is estimated that 500 respondents will complete a 6 minute form.
(6)*An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the collection:* There are an estimated 50 annual total burden hours associated with this collection. If additional information is required contact: Lynn Bryant, Department Clearance Officer, Policy and Planning Staff, Justice Management Division, Department of Justice, Patrick Henry Building, Suite 1600, 601 D Street, NW., Washington, DC 20530. Dated: April 23, 2007. Lynn Bryant, Department Clearance Officer, PRA, Department of Justice. [FR Doc. E7-8087 Filed 4-26-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-FY-P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Office of Justice Programs [OMB Number 1121-0277] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comments Requested ACTION: 60-Day Notice of Information Collection Under Review: Revisions of currently approved collection and Extension of currently approved collection; Office for Victims of Crime Training and Technical Assistance Center (OVC TTAC) and OJJDP National Training and Technical Assistance Center (NTTAC) Feedback Form Package. The Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB)for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for 60 days until June 26, 2007. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10 If you have comments, especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact Pamela Leupen, Director, Technical Assistance, Publications, and Information Resources, Office for Victims of Crime, Office of Justice Programs, Department of Justice, 810 7th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20530 or Steve Antkowiak, Training and Technical Assistance Coordinator, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office of Justice Programs, Department of Justice, 810 7th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20531. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: —Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency/component, including whether the information will have practical utility; —Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies/components estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; —Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and —Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Overview of this information collection:
(1)Type of Information Collection: Revisions of Currently Approved Collection and Extension of a Currently Approved Collection.
(2)The Title of the Form/Collection: OVC TTAC and NTTAC Feedback Form Package.
(3)The Agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the Department of Justice sponsoring the collection: Form Number(s): T-100, T-200, T-300, G-100, G-200, and G-300. Office for Victims of Crime, Office of Justice Programs, Department of Justice. Additionally, the applicable agency for the NTTAC evaluation and needs assessment forms is the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office of Justice Programs, Department of Justice.
(4)Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract, Primary: State, Local or Tribal. Other: Federal Government; Individuals or households; Not-for-profit institutions; Businesses or other for-profit. Abstract: The Office for Victims of Crime Training and Technical Assistance Center (OVC TTAC) and OJJDP National Training and Technical Assistance Center (NTTAC) Feedback Form Package is designed to collect the data necessary to continuously assess the outcome and impact of the assistance provided through OVC TTAC and NTTAC for both monitoring and accountability purposes to continuously meet the needs of the victim service field. Both OVC TTAC and NTTAC will send these forms to technical assistance
(TA)recipients, to capture important feedback on the recipient's satisfaction with the quality, efficiency, referrals, and resources provided. Additionally, needs assessment forms will be sent to OJJDP grantees and juvenile justice professionals for voluntary completion. The data will then be used to advise OVC TTAC and NTTAC on ways to improve the support provided to its users and the victim service field at-large.
(5)An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time estimated for an average respondent to respond/reply: There are approximately 16,492 respondents who will require an average of 5 minutes to respond to a single form for TTAC and approximately 4,850 respondents who will require an average of 5 minutes to respond to a single evaluation form for NTTAC. Additionally, approximately 4,572 respondents will require an average of 15 minutes to respond to the needs assessment form for NTTAC.
(6)An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the collection: The total annual public burden hours for this information collection is estimated to be 2921 hours. If additional information is required contact Lynn Bryant, Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, Planning and Policy Staff, Justice Management Division, 601 D Street, NW., Suite 1600, Washington, DC 20530. Dated: April 23, 2007. Lynn Bryant, Department Clearance Officer, PRA, United States Department of Justice. [FR Doc. 07-2076 Filed 4-26-07; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 5
3 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 106-465
  • Pub. L. 109-45
  • 5 CFR 1320.10
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice
Pub. L.Pub. L. 106-465
Pub. L.Pub. L. 109-45
Cite5 CFR 1320.10
Cites 8Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.