Notices. Notice of availability of a Record of Decision on the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Grand Teton Transportation Plan, Grand Teton National Park
7,885 words·~36 min read·
/register/2007/04/24/07-2052·A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
BILLING CODE 4312-AD-M DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service Grand Teton Transportation Plan, Final Environmental Impact Statement, Grand Teton National Park, WY AGENCY: National Park Service, Department of the Interior. ACTION: Notice of availability of a Record of Decision on the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Grand Teton Transportation Plan, Grand Teton National Park. SUMMARY: Pursuant to § 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 83 Stat. 852, 853, codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C), the National Park Service announces the availability of the Record of Decision for the Grand Teton Transportation Plan, Grand Teton National Park, WY.
On March 12, 2007, the Director, Intermountain Region approved the Record of Decision for the project. As soon as practicable, the National Park Service will begin to implement the Preferred Alternative contained in the FEIS issued on September 15, 2006. The following course of action will occur under the preferred alternative: construction of approximately 23 miles of separated multi-use pathways between the south park boundary and String Lake via North Jenny Lake Junction; approximately 16 miles of pathways within the road corridor between North Jenny Lake Junction and Colter Bay; an approximately 3-mile pathway within the road corridor along the Moose-Wilson Road from the Granite Canyon Entrance to the Laurance S.
Rockefeller
(LSR)Preserve; and realignment of the Moose-Wilson Road in two areas, with the existing alignments being restored to natural conditions. This course of action was analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement and combines two alternatives presented in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Four other alternatives were analyzed in the Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements. The full range of foreseeable environmental consequences was assessed, and appropriate mitigating measures were identified. The Record of Decision includes a statement of the decision made, synopses of other alternatives considered, the basis for the decision, a description of the environmentally preferable alternative, a finding on impairment of park resources and values, a listing of measures to minimize environmental harm, and an overview of public involvement in the decision-making process. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Gibson Scott, Superintendent, Grand Teton National Park, P.O. Drawer 170, Moose, Wyoming 83012-0170,
(307)739-3410. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Copies of the Record of Decision may be obtained from the contact listed above or online at *http://parkplanning.nps.gov/grte.* Dated: March 12, 2007. Anthony J. Schetzsle, Deputy Director, Intermountain Region, National Park Service. [FR Doc. E7-7739 Filed 4-23-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312-CX-P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service Notice of Availability for the Record of Decision on the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Niobrara National Scenic River General Management Plan, Nebraska AGENCY: National Park Service, Department of the Interior. SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the National Park Service
(NPS)announces the availability of the Record of Decision
(ROD)Niobrara National Scenic River (Scenic River) General Management Plan/final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), Scenic River. On March 26, the Midwest Regional Director approved the ROD for the project. As soon as practicable, the NPS will begin to implement the Preferred Alternative contained in the final EIS issued on February 23. Management Alternative B develops a vision for cooperative management of the Scenic River, with the NPS providing stewardship directly and through Federal, State, and local partners on a landscape that would remain largely in private ownership. The alternative's boundary protects, as equitably as possible, the river's outstandingly remarkable scenic, recreational, geologic, fish and wildlife, and paleontological values. This alternative encompasses 23,074 acres and is within the acreage limitations of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. This course of action and three alternatives were analyzed in the draft and the final EIS. The full range of foreseeable environmental consequences was assessed and appropriate mitigating measures were identified. The ROD includes a statement of the decision made, synopses of other alternatives considered, the basis for the decision, a description of the environmentally preferable alternative, a finding on impairment of park resources and values, a listing of measures to minimize environmental harm, and an overview of public involvement in the decisionmaking process. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Superintendent, Niobrara National Scenic River, P.O. Box 591, O'Neill, Nebraska 68763, or by calling 402-336-3970. Copies of the final EIS and ROD are available upon request from the above address or may be viewed online at *http://parkplanning.nps.gov/* . Dated: March 29, 2007. Ernest Quintana, Regional Director, Midwest Region. [FR Doc. E7-7745 Filed 4-23-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312-BM-P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service Construction of New Utah Museum of Natural History, Final Environmental Impact Statement, Salt Lake County, UT AGENCY: National Park Service, Department of the Interior. ACTION: Notice of Availability of a Record of Decision on the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Construction and Operation of a Proposed New Utah Museum of Natural History at the University of Utah. SUMMARY: Pursuant to § 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 83 Stat. 852, 853, codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C), the National Park Service and the University of Utah announce the availability of the Record of Decision for the Construction and Operation of a Proposed New Utah Museum of Natural History at the University of Utah, Salt Lake County, Utah. On March 26, 2007, the Director, Intermountain Region approved the Record of Decision for the project. As soon as practicable, the University of Utah will begin to implement the Preferred Alternative contained in the FEIS issued on February 23, 2007. The following course of action will occur under the preferred alternative: the new museum building will be built uphill from the pipeline corridor/Bonneville Shoreline Trail that pass through the new site. Parking will be provided in a joint Red Butte Garden and Arboretum/Utah Museum of Natural History facility, or if a joint facility is not viable, downhill from the pipeline corridor. Flexibility is afforded for site design and placement of facilities. A portion of the development area extends into Red Butte Garden and Arboretum property. This course of action and five alternatives were analyzed in the Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements. The full range of foreseeable environmental consequences was assessed, and appropriate mitigating measures were identified. The Record of Decision includes a statement of the decision made, synopses of other alternatives considered, the basis for the decision, a description of the environmentally preferable alternative, a listing of measures to minimize environmental harm, and an overview of public involvement in the decision-making process. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ralph E. Becker, The Shipley Group and Bear West, 1584 South 500 West, Suite 201, Woods Cross, Utah 84010; phone 801-355-8816; e-mail to *rbecker@bearwest.com.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Copies of the Record of Decision may be obtained from the contact listed above or online at *http://www.umnh.utah.edu.* Dated: March 26, 2007. Anthony J. Schetzsle, Deputy Director, Intermountain Region, National Park Service. [FR Doc. E7-7742 Filed 4-23-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312-52-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-60,882] Camaco, LLC; Mariana Division, Marianna, AR; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration By application dated April 4, 2007, a company official requested administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative determination regarding eligibility for workers and former workers of the subject firm to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance
(TAA)and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA). The denial notice was signed on March 16, 2007 and published in the **Federal Register** on March 30, 2007 (72 FR 15168). Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under the following circumstances:
(1)If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered that the determination complained of was erroneous;
(2)If it appears that the determination complained of was based on a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
(3)If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a mis-interpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of the decision. The TAA petition, filed on behalf of workers at Camaco, LLC, Marianna Division, Marianna, Arkansas engaged in production of automotive parts, such as metal seat frames, brackets and reinforcement was denied because the “contributed importantly” group eligibility requirement of Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974 was not met. The “contributed importantly” test is generally demonstrated through a survey of the workers' firm's customers. The survey revealed no imports of automotive parts, such as metal seat frames, brackets and reinforcement in 2005, 2006 and January of 2007 when compared with January of 2006. The subject firm did not import automotive parts, such as metal seat frames, brackets and reinforcement in the relevant period nor did it shift production to a foreign country. In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner stated that the subject firm made parts for a company which shifted production to Mexico. As a result of this shift, the subject firm experienced declines in sales. Therefore, workers of the subject firm should be eligible for TAA and ATAA. A company official was contacted to verify the business relationship between the subject firm and the alleged company. The company official stated that the company mentioned in the request for reconsideration was not the subject firm's customer and that the subject firm did not sell parts directly to this firm during the relevant time period. Because the alleged company was not the subject firm's customer during the relevant time period, any information regarding business activities of this company is not relevant to this investigation. The request for reconsideration also states that “some of the equipment that was utilized here at CAMACO-Marianna is being sent to India to be used at a manufacturing facility there for production of automotive parts.” Further contact with the company official confirmed that CAMACO, LLC, Marianna Division, Marianna, Arkansas is planning to shift a portion of its manufacturing equipment from Marianna, Arkansas to India. The company official further indicated that no production has been moved from the Marianna facility to India as of April 12, 2007, and no time line was established to when this may occur. Should the shift to India occur, the petitioner is encouraged to file a new petition on behalf of workers at the CAMACO, LLC, Marianna Division, Marianna, Arkansas, thereby creating a relevant period of investigation that would include changing conditions. The petitioner further refers to the TAA certifications issued to various businesses and industries located in Marianna, Arkansas. The petitioner alleges that because the subject firm has been the largest employer in Marianna, Arkansas and hence other companies in the area were certified eligible for TAA, workers of the subject firm should also be eligible. A review of other businesses is not relevant to an investigation concerning import impact on workers applying for trade adjustment assistance. As noted above, “contributed importantly” test is generally demonstrated through a survey of customers of the workers' firm to examine the direct impact on a specific firm. No increased imports were evidenced during the survey of subject firm's customers and the subject firm did not shift production to a foreign country. Conclusion After review of the application and investigative findings, I conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department of Labor's prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied. Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of April, 2007. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7-7726 Filed 4-23-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-60,556] Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc., Including On-Site Leased Workers of Action Staffing (American Services), Greenville, SC; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on February 16, 2007, applicable to workers of Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc., including on-site leased workers of Action Staffing, Greenville, South Carolina. The notice was published in the **Federal Register** on February 27, 2007 (72 FR 8795). At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers were engaged in the production of projection tubes for televisions. New information provided by the subject firm, shows that American Services is the parent company of the leasing firm, Action Staffing. Leased workers separated from employment at the subject firm had their wages reported under the unemployment insurance
(UI)tax account for American Services. Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to properly reflect this matter. The intent of the Department's certification is to include all workers of Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc. who were adversely affected by increased imports. The amended notice applicable to TA-W-60,556 is hereby issued as follows: All workers of Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc., including on-site leased workers from Action Staffing, American Services, Greenville, South Carolina, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after November 25, 2006, through February 16, 2009, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974. Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of April 2007. Linda G. Poole, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7-7725 Filed 4-23-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Investigations Regarding Certifications of Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under Section 221
(a)of the Trade Act of 1974 (“the Act”) and are identified in the Appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to Section 221
(a)of the Act. The purpose of each of the investigations is to determine whether the workers are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title II, Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations will further relate, as appropriate, to the determination of the date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved. The petitioners or any other persons showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigations may request a public hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than May 4, 2007. Interested persons are invited to submit written comments regarding the subject matter of the investigations to the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than May 4, 2007. The petitions filed in this case are available for inspection at the Office of the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room C-5311, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of April 2007. Ralph Dibattista, Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. Appendix [TAA petitions instituted between 4/9/07 and 4/13/07] TA-W Subject firm (petitioners) Location Date of institution Date of petition 61261 Missbrenner Prints, Inc.
(Comp)Clifton, NJ 04/09/07 03/13/07 61262 Linium Staffing LLC (State) Vernon, CT 04/09/07 04/05/07 61263 Parker Hannifin Corporation
(Comp)Iron Gate, VA 04/09/07 04/05/07 61264 Sanmine-Woburn (State) Woburn, MA 04/09/07 04/06/07 61265 O'Bryan Brothers, Inc.
(Wkrs)Leon, IA 04/09/07 04/06/07 61266 Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corp.
(Wkrs)Milwaukee, WI 04/09/07 03/23/07 61267 Fox River Paper/Neenah Paper
(Comp)Housatonic, MA 04/10/07 04/09/07 61268 Hewlett Packard Development Company TSG division (State) Austin, TX 04/10/07 04/09/07 61269 Auto Truck Transport Corp. (State) Portland, OR 04/10/07 04/09/07 61270 CNH American LLC, Belleville Manufacturing Plant
(Comp)Belleville, PA 04/10/07 04/09/07 61271 J.H. Baxter & Company (UBCJA) Eugene, OR 04/10/07 04/05/07 61272 U.S. Borax Inc.-Rio Tinto Minerals (State) Valencia, CA 04/10/07 04/06/07 61273 Jeld-Wen Door Systems
(Wkrs)Chiloquin, OR 04/10/07 03/16/07 61274 Robert Bosch Corp. (State) Sumter, SC 04/10/07 04/09/07 61275 DeRoyal Textiles
(Comp)Camden, SC 04/10/07 04/09/07 61276 ABN Amro (State) Chicago, IL 04/10/07 04/09/07 61277 Tonawanda Valve, Inc.
(UAW)North Tonawanda, NY 04/10/07 04/05/07 61278 Exxon Mobil Chemical Company
(Wkrs)Stratford, CT 04/10/07 04/09/07 61279 Lexmark International, Inc
(Wkrs)Lexington, KY 04/10/07 04/09/07 61280 Dutailer va Inc
(Comp)Martinsville, VA 04/10/07 03/28/07 61281 Form Tech Industries LLC
(Comp)Canal Fulton, OH 04/11/07 04/03/07 61282 Amphenol Phoenix Interconnect (State) Tustin, CA 04/11/07 04/10/07 61283 IBM Corp. (State) Fulton, KY 04/11/07 04/10/07 61284 Continental Structural Plastic
(Comp)Petoskey, MI 04/11/07 03/20/07 61285 Metrologic Corp (State) Blackwood, NJ 04/11/07 04/10/07 61286 Nevamar LLC, subsid of Panolam Industries Int'l Inc.
(Wkrs)Tarboro, NC 04/11/07 04/02/07 61287 HSS-Delphi/Belly Services (State) Siginaw, MI 04/11/07 03/26/07 61288 Honeywell International (State) Golden Valley, MN 04/11/07 04/10/07 61289 The Siemon Company (State) Watertown, CT 04/11/07 04/10/07 61290 Flexible Technologies
(Comp)Abbeville, SC 04/12/07 04/10/07 61291 RR Donnelley
(Wkrs)Liberty, MO 04/12/07 04/04/07 61292 Millipore Corporation Bioscience Division (State) Danvers, MA 04/12/07 04/10/07 61293 Georgia Pacific Corrugated
(Wkrs)Ridgeway, VA 04/12/07 04/08/07 61294 Oberie & Associates Inc (State) Richmond, IN 04/12/07 04/11/07 61295 Magnetics Division of Spang Inc.
(Wkrs)East Butler, PA 04/12/07 04/10/07 61296 Valeo Engine Cooling
(Wkrs)Jamestown, NY 04/12/07 04/11/07 61297 Melcor Corporation Laird Technologies
(Comp)Trenton, NJ 04/12/07 04/05/07 61298 American Manufacturing International, Inc.
(Comp)Paterson, NJ 04/12/07 04/10/07 61299 Isaco International
(Wkrs)Miami Lakes, FL 04/13/07 04/12/07 61300 McKinney Products Co. (Union) Scranton, PA 04/13/07 04/12/07 61301 Lexington Furniture Plant 15
(Wkrs)Lexington, NC 04/13/07 04/06/07 61302 TDS/US Automotive
(Comp)Chesapeake, VA 04/13/07 03/28/07 61303 Distinctive Machine Corp
(Comp)Rockford, MI 04/13/07 04/11/07 61304 Securitas (working on the site at Robert Bosch) (State) Sumter, SC 04/13/07 04/11/07 61305 La-Z-Boy Manufacturing, Inc., Lincolnton Facility
(Wkrs)Lincolnton, NC 04/13/07 04/10/07 61306 Anolog Devices, Inc
(Wkrs)Norwood, MA 04/13/07 04/02/07 61307 Simply Asia Food (McCormick) (State) Union City, CA 04/13/07 04/04/07 61308 Allied Air (Armstrong Air Conditioning)
(Wkrs)Bellevue, OH 04/13/07 04/04/07 61309 Shiloh Ind. Mansfield Blanking Div.
(USW)Mansfield, OH 04/13/07 04/05/07 61310 Global Heating Solutions
(Comp)Allegan, MI 04/13/07 04/10/07 61311 HSS Material Management Solutions (State) Saginaw, MI 04/13/07 04/11/07 61312 Ashdale Foam Inc.
(Comp)Conover, NC 04/13/07 04/10/07 [FR Doc. E7-7722 Filed 4-23-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers (TA-W) number and alternative trade adjustment assistance
(ATAA)by (TA-W) number issued during the period of *April 2 through April 6, 2007.* In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision have decreased absolutely; and C. Increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. There has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or subdivision; and C. One of the following must be satisfied: 1. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United States; 2. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act; or 3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are or were produced by such firm or subdivision. Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made for secondarily affected workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met.
(1)Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers' firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2)The workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related to the article that was the basis for such certification; and
(3)Either—
(A)The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph
(2)accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or
(B)A loss or business by the workers' firm with the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph
(2)contributed importantly to the workers' Separation or threat of separation. In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issued a certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
(ATAA)for older workers, the group eligibility requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met. 1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are 50 years of age or older. 2. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are not easily transferable. 3. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry ( *i.e.* , conditions within the industry are adverse). Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met. *TA-W-61,011; Shafer Electronics Co., Shafer MN: March 15, 2007.* *TA-W-61,023; Lenze Corporation, Emporia, KS: February 23, 2006.* The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the Trade Act have been met. *TA-W-61,008; Hutchens Industries, Inc. Foundry, Mansfield, MO: February 8, 2006.* *TA-W-61,018; International Truck and Engine Corporation Truck Development and Technical Center, Fort Wayne, IN: February 22, 2006.* The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met. *TA-W-61,210; Carlson Wood Products, Inc., Sinclairville, NY:* March 22, 2006. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act have been met. *None.* Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. *TA-W-60,974; Cadence Innovation, Advanced Engineering Center, Fraser, MI: January 19, 2006.* *TA-W-61,067; Johnson Controls, Grace Power Plant, On-Site at Springs Global, Lancaster, SC: February 19, 2006.* *TA-W-61,111; Bodine Electric Company, Sedona Staffing, Peosta, IA: March 14, 2006.* *TA-W-61,144; Royal Home Fashions, A Subsidiary of Croscill, Inc., Durham, NC: February 14, 2006.* *TA-W-61,155; Pine Hosiery Mills, Inc., Ether Plant, Star, NC: March 15, 2006.* *TA-W-61,163; Springs Global US, Inc., Calhoun Division, Defender Industries, Calhoun, GA: March 21, 2006.* *TA-W-60,596; TTM Technologies, Formerly Know As Tyco Electronics, Kelly Services, Dallas, OR: February 18, 2007.* *TA-W-60,840; Marathon Apparel, Temp Force of Sylacauga, Childersburg, AL: January 25, 2006.* *TA-W-60,968; Delux Media Services LLC, Staff Management, North Little Rock, AR: February 14, 2006.* *TA-W-60,937; Key Fashion, Inc., Brooklyn, NY: February 8, 2006.* The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. *TA-W-60,995; Distinctive Designs Furniture USA, Granite Falls Division, Express Personal, Granite Falls, NC: February 19, 2006.* *TA-W-61,080; A.O. Smith Electrical Products Company, McMinnville, TN: March 19, 2007.* *TA-W-61,088; Evans Rule Company, Inc., L.S. Starrett Co., Inc., Charleston, SC: March 8, 2007.* *TA-W-61,148; Russell Corporation, Plant #10, Alexander City, AL: August 27, 2006.* *TA-W-61,170; Centurion Wireless Technologies, d/b/a Laird Technologies, Lincoln, NE: March 22, 2006.* *TA-W-61,102; Springs Global US, Inc., Hartwell Weaving and Yarn Div., Defender Services Johnson, Hartwell, GA: March 30, 2007.* *TA-W-60,823; Industrial Metal Products Corporation, Lansing, MI: January 19, 2006.* *TA-W-61,090; Easton Sports, Inc, Div. of Easton-Bell Sports, Select Personnel, Onsite Agency, Van Nuys, CA: March 9, 2006.* *TA-W-61,105; Kidde Fenwal, Kidde North America Division, Davis Companies, Ashland, MA: March 12, 2006.* *TA-W-61,169; Mitsui Components, Inc., Mitsui Smelting and Mining, Adecco, Casa Grande, AZ: March 19, 2006.* The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. *TA-W-61,020; Stroupe Mirror Company, Thomasville, NC: February 24, 2006.* The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. *None.* Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, it has been determined that the requirements of 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for the reasons specified. The Department has determined that criterion
(1)of Section 246 has not been met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of age or older. *TA-W-61,011; Shafer Electronics Co., Shafer, MN.* *TA-W-61,210; Carlson Wood Products, Inc., Sinclairville, NY.* The Department has determined that criterion
(2)of Section 246 has not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily transferable. *TA-W-61,008; Hutchens Industries, Inc. Foundry Mansfield, MO.* *TA-W-61,018; International Truck and Engine Corporation Truck Development and Technical Center, Fort Wayne, IN.* *TA-W-61,023; Lenze Corporation, Emporia, KS.* The Department has determined that criterion
(3)of Section 246 has not been met. Competition conditions within the workers' industry are not adverse. *None.* Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified. Because the workers of the firm are not eligible to apply for TAA, the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA. The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.) (employment decline) have not been met. *TA-W-61,033; Trans-Matic Manufacturing, Holland, MN.* *TA-W-61,156; Classic Tool Inc, Saegertown, MI.* The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met. *TA-W-61,114; Vestal Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc., Sweetwater, GA.* *TA-W-61,158; Jeld Wen Door Systems, Door Division, Chiloquin, NC.* The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met. *TA-W-60,826; Paxar Americas, Inc., A Subsidiary of Paxar Corporation, Machine Div., Sayre, OR.* *TA-W-60,944; Morton International, Inc., Salt Division, Weeks Island Facility, New Iberia, AL.* *TA-W-61,000; Gibraltar DFC Strip Steel LLC, Farrell, NY.* *TA-W-61,008A; Hutchens Industries, Inc., Fabrication Department, Mansfield, AR.* *TA-W-61,029; Werner Co., Corporate Division, Greenville, MI.* *TA-W-61,042; Kirkwood USA, Inc., Ripley, KS.* *TA-W-61,044; Michigan Metal Coating Company, Metal Coatings International, Inc., Rochester Hills, SC.* The investigation revealed that the predominate cause of worker separations is unrelated to criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.C) (shift in production to a foreign country under a free trade agreement or a beneficiary country under a preferential trade agreement, or there has been or is likely to be an increase in imports). *TA-W-61,083; Intel Corporation, Optical Platform Division, Newark, NC.* The workers' firm does not produce an article as required for certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974. *TA-W-61,061; IBM Corporation, Integrated Technology Delivery Division, Hazelwood, GA.* *TA-W-61,062; Logistic Services, Inc., Oklahoma City, IA.* *TA-W-61,085; Verizon Business,Sub. of Verizon Communications, Wholesale Service, Tulsa, NC.* *TA-W-61,239; Direct Holdings Libraries, Inc., Direct Holdings Americas, Inc., Chicago, MO.* The investigation revealed that criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been met. The workers' firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier to or a downstream producer for a firm whose workers were certified eligible to apply for TAA. *None.* I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of *April 2 through April 6, 2007* . Copies of these determinations are available for inspection in Room C-5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 during normal business hours or will be mailed to persons who write to the above address. Dated: April 17, 2007. Ralph Dibattista, Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7-7723 Filed 4-23-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-60,940] U.S. Global Flag LLC, Inc., Thorn, Inc., Paterson, NJ; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on March 29, 2007, applicable to workers of U.S. Global Flag LLC, Inc., Paterson, New Jersey. The notice was published in the **Federal Register** on April 10, 2007 (72 FR 17937). At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers were engaged in the production of men's trousers and short trousers and women's trousers and short skirts and jacket linings and bedding. New information shows that following a corporate decision, workers separated from employment at the subject firm had their wages reported under a separate unemployment insurance
(UI)tax account for Thorn, Inc., a companion company. Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to properly reflect this matter. The intent of the Department's certification is to include all workers of U.S. Global Flag LLC, Inc., Paterson, New Jersey who were adversely affected by increased company imports. The amended notice applicable to TA-W-60,940 is hereby issued as follows: All workers of U.S. Global Flag LLC, Inc., including workers paid by Thorn, Inc., Paterson, New Jersey, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after January 31, 2006, through March 29, 2009, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974. Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of April 2007. Richard Church, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7-7721 Filed 4-23-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-56,863] Valspar-Furniture Sales Group & International Color Design Center, a Subsidiary of Valspar Global Wood Coatings D/B/A/ Engineered Polymer Solutions High Point, NC; Including Employees of Valspar-Furniture Sales Group & International Color Design Center a Subsidiary of Valspar Global Wood Coatings, D/B/A Engineered Polymer Solutions High Point, NC Operating at Various Locations in the Following States: TA-W-56,863A Virginia, TA-W-56,863B Vermont, TA-W-56,863C California, TA-W-56,863D Michigan; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on May 6, 2005, applicable to workers of Valspar-Furniture Sales Group & International Color Design Center, a subsidiary of Valspar Global Wood Coatings, High Point, North Carolina. The notice was published in the **Federal Register** on May 25, 2005 (70 FR 30146). At the request of the state agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. New Information shows that Valspar-Furniture Sales Group & International Color Design Center, a subsidiary of Valspar-Global Wood Coatings is doing business as Engineered Polymer Solutions. Information also shows that worker separations have occurred involving out-stationed employees of the subject firm who supported production at the High Point, North Carolina location from the following states: Virginia, Vermont, California and Michigan. Based on this new information, the Department is amending this certification to include “doing business as Engineered Polymer Solutions” and to also include out-stationed employees of the subject firm located in the following states: Virginia, Vermont, California and Michigan. The intent of the Department's certification is to include all workers of Valspar-Furniture Sales Group & International Color Design Center, a subsidiary of Valspar Global Wood Coatings, d/b/a Engineered Polymer Solutions, High Point, North Carolina and out-stationed personnel who were adversely affected by increased imports. The amended notice applicable to TA-W-56,863 is hereby issued as follows: All workers of Valspar-Furniture Sales Group & International Color Design Center, a subsidiary of Valspar Global Wood Coatings, d/b/a/ Engineered Polymer Solutions, High Point, North Carolina (TA-W-56,863), including out-stationed personnel in Virginia (TA-W-863A), Vermont (TA-W-863B), California (TA-W-863C) and Michigan (TA-W-863D) who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after March 14, 2004, through May 6, 2007, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974. Signed at Washington, DC this 13th day of April 2007. Richard Church, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7-7724 Filed 4-23-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Proposed Information Collection Request for Attestations by Facilities Temporarily Employing H-1C Nonimmigrant Aliens as Registered Nurses; Comment Request ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden conducts a preclearance consultation program to provide the general public and Federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This program helps to ensure that requested data can be provided in the desired format, reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized, collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of collection requirements on respondents can be properly assessed. The Employment and Training Administration
(ETA)is soliciting comments on a request to reinstate, without modification, collection of information on the ETA Form 9081, Attestations by Facilities Temporarily Employing H-1C Nonimmigrant Aliens as Registered Nurses. Reinstatement of this collection is necessary to support implementation of the Nursing Relief for Disadvantaged Areas Act of 1999, which was reauthorized by the Congress on December 20, 2006. DATES: Written Comments must be submitted to the office listed in the addressee's section below on or before June 25, 2007. ADDRESSES: Submit written comments to the Employment and Training Administration Office of Foreign Labor Certification, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room C-4312, Washington, DC 20210; Attention: Brian Pasternak. Telephone number:
(202)693-3010 (this is not a toll-free number). Fax:
(202)693-2768. E-mail: *H-1C9089.Comments@dol.gov* . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background On November 12, 1999, the Nursing Relief for Disadvantaged Areas Act of 1999 (NRDAA), Public Law 106-95, amended the Immigration and Nationality Act
(INA)to establish the H-1C program to reduce the shortage of qualified nurses in Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs). The ETA and Employment Standards Administration
(ESA)promulgated regulations at 20 CFR part 655, subparts L and M, governing the filing and enforcement of attestations by facilities seeking to employ aliens as registered nurses in HPSAs on a temporary basis. The NRDAA allows qualified hospitals to employ temporary foreign workers as registered nurses for up to three
(3)years under the H-1C visas. Facilities seeking H-1C visas are required to file attestations with the Secretary of Labor. Each facility must attest that
(1)It meets the definition of “facility” based on the Social Security Act and the Public Health Service Act,
(2)it did not and will not lay off a registered nurse in the period between 90 days before and 90 days after the filing of any H-1C petition,
(3)it will not employ a number of H-1C nurses that exceeds 33 percent of the total number of registered nurses employed at the facility, and
(4)it will not authorize the H-1C nurse to perform nursing services at any worksite other than a worksite controlled by the facility or transfer the H-1C nurse's place of employment from one work place to another. The NRDAA expired on June 13, 2005. However, on December 20, 2006, with the enactment of Public Law 109-423, Congress reauthorized the H-1C program for an additional three
(3)years. The key provisions of the program remain unaffected and take effect immediately. The mechanism for employers or facilities to make attestations to the Secretary of Labor is the ETA Form 9081, and to expedite implementation of the reauthorized statute, the ETA is requesting a reinstatement, without modifications, to this information collection. II. Review Focus The Department of Labor is particularly interested in comments which: • Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; • Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; • Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and • Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, *e.g.* , permitting electronic submissions of responses. A copy of the proposed ICR can be obtained by contacting the office listed above in the addressee section of this notice. III. Current Actions *Type of Review:* Reinstatement. *Agency:* Employment and Training Administration. *Title:* Attestations by Facilities Temporarily Employing H-1C Nonimmigrant Aliens as Registered Nurses. *OMB Number:* 1205-0415. *Affected Public:* Businesses and not-for-profit institutions. Cite/Reference/Form/etc.: Nursing Relief for Disadvantaged Areas Act of 1999, as amended; ETA Form 9081. *Total Respondents:* 14. *Frequency:* On occasion. *Total Responses:* 172 attestations on an annual basis. *Average Time per Response:* 40 minutes. *Estimated Total Burden Hours:* 68 hours. *Total Burden Cost (capital/startup):* $0. *Total Burden Cost (operating/maintaining):* $0. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval of the information collection request; they will also become a matter of public record. Dated: April 12, 2007. William L. Carlson, Administrator, Office of Foreign Labor Certification. [FR Doc. E7-7689 Filed 4-23-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-FP-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Occupational Safety and Health Administration Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office of Management and Budget
(OMB)Control Numbers Under the Paperwork Reduction Act AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor. ACTION: Notice; announcement of OMB approval of information collection requirements. SUMMARY: The Occupational Safety and Health Administration announces that OMB has extended its approval for a number of information collection requirements found in sections of 29 CFR parts 1910, 1915, 1917, 1918, 1926, and 1928; and for OSHA's Data Initiative. OSHA sought approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA-95), and, as required by that Act, is announcing the approval numbers and expiration dates for those requirements. DATES: This notice is effective April 24, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd Owen or Theda Kenney, Directorate of Standards and Guidance, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-3609, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210, telephone:
(202)693-2222. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a series of **Federal Register** notices, the Agency announced its requests to OMB to renew its current extensions of approvals for various information collection (paperwork) requirements in its safety and health standards for general industry, shipyard employment, longshoring, marine terminals, the construction industry, and agriculture ( *i.e.* , 29 CFR parts 1910, 1915, 1917, 1918, 1926, and 1928); and for OSHA's Data Initiative. In these **Federal Register** notices, the Agency provided 60-day comment periods for the public to respond to OSHA's burden hour and cost estimates. In accordance with PRA-95 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), OMB renewed its approval for these information collection requirements and assigned OMB control numbers to these requirements. The table below provides the following information for each of these OMB-approved requirements: The title of the collection; the date of the **Federal Register** notice; the **Federal Register** reference (date, volume, and leading page); OMB's control number; and the new expiration date. Title Date of Federal Register publication, Federal Register reference, and OSHA docket number OMB control No. Expiration date Electrical Protective Equipment (29 CFR 1910.137), and Electric Power Generation, Transmission, and Distribution (29 CFR 1910.269) 09/14/2006, 71 FR 54309, Docket No. 1218-0190
(2006)1218-0190 02/28/2010 Ethylene Oxide
(EtO)(29 CFR 1910.1047) 10/16/2006, 71 FR 60769, Docket No. 1218-0108
(2006)1218-0108 02/28/2010 4,4-Methylenedianiline Construction (29 CFR 1926.60) 08/16/2006, 71 FR 47253, Docket No. 1218-0184
(2006)1218-0183 02/28/2010 4,4-Methylenedianiline General Industry (29 CFR 1910.1050) 08/30/2006, 71 FR 51639, Docket No. 1218-0184
(2006)1218-0184 02/28/2010 OSHA Data Initiative
(ODI)05/22/2006, 71 FR 29355, Docket No. 1218-0209
(2006)1218-0209 03/31/2010 Walking—Working Surfaces Standard (29 CFR part 1910, subpart D) 09/14/2006, 71 FR 54311, Docket No. 1218-0199
(2006)1218-0199 02/28/2010 In accordance with 5 CFR 1320.5(b), an agency cannot conduct, sponsor, or require a response to a collection of information unless the collection displays a valid OMB control number and the agency informs respondents that they are not required to respond to the collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Authority and Signature Edwin G. Foulke, Jr., Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health, directed the preparation of this notice. The authority for this notice is the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506 *et seq.* ) and Secretary of Labor's Order No. 5-2002 (67 FR 65008). Signed at Washington, DC, on April 17, 2007. Edwin G. Foulke, Jr., Assistant Secretary of Labor. [FR Doc. E7-7728 Filed 4-23-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-26-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Occupational Safety and Health Administration Asbestos in General Industry; Extension of the Office of Management and Budget's
(OMB)Approval of Information Collection (Paperwork) Requirements; Correction AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor. ACTION: Request for public comment; correction. SUMMARY: The Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA)published a document in the **Federal Register** on April 5, 2007, soliciting public comments concerning its proposal to extend OMB approval of the information collection requirements specified in its Asbestos in General Industry Standard (29 CFR 1910.1001). The document contained an incorrect docket number. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd Owen, Directorate of Standards and Guidance, OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-3609, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone
(202)693-2222. Correction In the **Federal Register** of April 5, 2007 (72 FR 16830-16832), on page 16830, in the third column; on page 16831, in the first column; and on page 16832, in the first column, correct the Docket No. to read: Docket No. OSHA-2007-0023. Authority and Signature Edwin G. Foulke, Jr., Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health, directed the preparation of this notice. The authority for this notice is the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506 *et seq.* ) and Secretary of Labor's Order No. 5-2002 (67 FR 65008). Signed at Washington, DC, on April 16, 2007. Edwin G. Foulke, Jr., Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health. [FR Doc. E7-7727 Filed 4-23-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-26-P LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION Call-In Instructions for Sunshine Act Meetings of the Board of Directors and Four of the Board's Committees Times and Dates: The Legal Services Corporation Board of Directors and four of its Committees will meet on April 27-28, 2007 in the order set forth in the following schedule, with each meeting commencing shortly after adjournment of the immediately preceding meeting. Public Observation by Telephone: Members of the public that wish to listen to the open portions of the meetings live may do so by following the telephone call-in directions given below. You are asked to keep your telephone muted to eliminate background noises. Comments from the public may be solicited by the presiding official from time-to-time and remarks may then be offered. Call-In Instructions: 1. Call toll-free number 1-877-352-5208; 2. When prompted, enter the following numeric pass code: 66701; 3. When connected to the call, each callers should immediately “MUTE” his/her telephone. Meeting Schedule Meeting type Date Approximate time 1 Status Provisions Committee Friday, April 27 1:30 p.m Open. Ops & Regs Committee Friday, April 27 (Following prior meeting) Open. Performance Reviews Committee Saturday, April 28 8:30 a.m CLOSED to the public. Ops & Regs Committee (cont.) Saturday, April 28 (Following prior meeting) Open. Finance Committee Saturday, April 28 (Following prior meeting) Open. Board of Directors 2 Saturday, April 28 1 p.m Open. Board of Directors Saturday, April 28 (Following open session) CLOSED to the public. 1 Please note that the meetings will be held in the Central Time zone and that projected meeting times may not be exact. 2 It is LSC's goal to begin the open portion of the Board of Directors meeting at approximately 1 p.m., after a brief lunch break. Depending on the length of the preceding meetings, however, it is possible that the Board's meeting could begin earlier or later than 1 p.m. Location: The Peabody Hotel, Three State Street, Little Rock, Arkansas. Agendas for the meetings were issued previously and may be viewed on the Corporation's Web site at *http://www.lsc.gov/pdfs/04-27-07BoardCommittees.pdf* . Contact Person for Information: Patricia D. Batie, Manager of Board Operations, at
(202)295-1500. Special Needs: Upon request, meeting notices will be made available in alternate formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments. Individuals who have a disability and need an accommodation to attend the meeting may notify Patricia D. Batie, at
(202)295-1500. Dated: April 20, 2007. Victor M. Fortuno, Vice President for Legal Affairs, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary. [FR Doc. 07-2052 Filed 4-20-07; 2:46 pm]
Connectionstraces to 10
Traces to 10 documents
statutes-at-large
U.S. Code
8 references not yet in our index
- 29 CFR 90.18(c)
- 26 USC 2813
- Pub. L. 106-95
- 20 CFR 655
- Pub. L. 109-423
- 44 USC 3501-3520
- 29 CFR 1910
- 5 CFR 1320.5(b)
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice of availability of a Record of Decision on the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Grand Teton Transportation Plan, Grand Teton National Park
Cite29 CFR 90.18(c)
Cite26 USC 2813
Pub. L.Pub. L. 106-95
Cites 18 · showing 12Cited by 0 across 0 sources