Notices. Notice and request for comments
13,365 words·~61 min read·
/register/2007/03/01/07-908A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Bureau of Customs and Border Protection Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Land Border Carrier Initiative Program ACTION: Notice and request for comments. SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, Bureau of Customs and Border Protection
(CBP)invites the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on an information collection requirement concerning the Land Border Carrier Initiative Program (LBCIP). This request for comment is being made pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13; 44 U.S.C. 3505(c)(2)). DATES: Written comments should be received on or before April 30, 2007, to be assured of consideration. ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, Information Services Group, *Attn.:* Tracey Denning, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Room 3.2C, Washington, DC 20229. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information should be directed to Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, *Attn.:* Tracey Denning, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Room 3.2.C, Washington, DC 20229, Tel.
(202)344-1429. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: CBP invites the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on proposed and/or continuing information collections pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13; 44 U.S.C. 3505(c)(2)). The comments should address:
(a)Whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility;
(b)the accuracy of the agency's estimates of the burden of the collection of information;
(c)ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected;
(d)ways to minimize the burden including the use of automated collection techniques or the use of other forms of information technology; and
(e)estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operations, maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information. The comments that are submitted will be summarized and included in the CBP request for Office of Management and Budget
(OMB)approval. All comments will become a matter of public record. In this document CBP is soliciting comments concerning the following information collection: *Title:* Land Border Carrier Initiative Program. *OMB Number:* 1651-0077. *Form Number:* N/A. *Abstract:* LBCIP is a Program in which applicants are pre-screened in order to receive expedited processing at CBP land ports-of-entry. The Customs and Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT) Program supersedes LBCIP and expands it to include other entities, including air and sea. Its purpose is also to provide participants expedited processing at ports-of-entry. CBP requests that the name of this information collection be changed from Land Border Carrier Initiative Program (LBCIP) to Customs and Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT). *Current Actions:* This submission is being submitted to extend the expiration date and to revise this information collection. *Type of Review:* Extension (with change). *Affected Public:* Businesses, Individuals, Institutions. *Estimated Number of Respondents:* 6,500. *Estimated Time per Respondent:* 5 hours. *Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:* 32,500. *Estimated Total Annualized Cost on the Public:* N/A. Dated: February 22, 2007. Tracey Denning, Agency Clearance Officer, Information Services Branch. [FR Doc. E7-3557 Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9111-14-P DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT [Docket No. FR-5117-N-23] Notice of Submission of Proposed Information Collection to OMB; Civil Rights Front End and Limited Monitoring Review AGENCY: Office of the Chief Information Officer, HUD. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The proposed information collection requirement described below has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB)for review, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act. The Department is soliciting public comments on the subject proposal. The Office of Public and Indian Housing
(PIH)has developed 2 checklists to conduct civil rights monitoring reviews of 20 Public Housing Agencies
(PHAs)in FY07, in support of HUD's strategic goal of ensuring equal opportunity in housing. PIH staff will complete checklist A (On-site Limited Review of Civil Rights-Related Program Requirements for Low Rent and Housing Choice Voucher Programs) during onsite comprehensive reviews. PHAs will complete checklist B (onsite Limited review of Section 504 Monitoring). The information collected will be used to evaluate a PHA's compliance with the Fair Housing Laws. DATES: *Comments Due Date:* April 2, 2007. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding this proposal. Comments should refer to the proposal by name and/or OMB Approval Number (2577-NEW) and should be sent to: HUD Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503; *fax:* 202-395-6974. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lillian Deitzer, Departmental Reports Management Officer, QDAM, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20410; e-mail *Lillian_L._Deitzer@HUD.gov* or telephone
(202)708-2374. This is not a toll-free number. Copies of available documents submitted to OMB may be obtained from Ms. Deitzer or from HUD's Web site at *http://www5.hud.gov:63001/po/i/icbts/collectionsearch.cfm.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice informs the public that the Department of Housing and Urban Development has submitted to OMB a request for approval of the information collection described below. This notice is soliciting comments from members of the public and affecting agencies concerning the proposed collection of information to:
(1)Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility;
(2)Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information;
(3)Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(4)Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond; including through the use of appropriate automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. This Notice Also Lists the Following Information *Title of Proposal:* Civil Rights Front End and Limited Monitoring Review. *OMB Approval Number:* 2577-New. *Form Numbers:* Hud-Pending. Description of the Need for the Information and Its Proposed Use PIH has developed 2 checklists to conduct civil rights monitoring reviews of 20 PHAs in FY07, in support of HUD's strategic goal of ensuring equal opportunity in housing. PIH staff will complete checklist A (On-site Limited Review of Civil Rights-Related Program Requirements for Low Rent and Housing Choice Voucher Programs) during onsite comprehensive reviews. Public Housing Agencies will complete checklist B (on-site Limited review of Section 504 Monitoring). The information collected will be used to evaluate a PHA's compliance with the Fair Housing Laws. *Frequency of Submission:* On occasion, Annually. Number of respondents Annual responses × Hours per response = Burden hours Reporting Burden 20 1 2 40 *Total Estimated Burden Hours:* 40 *Status:* New Collection. Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 35, as amended. Dated: February 26, 2007. Lillian L. Deitzer, Departmental Paperwork Reduction Act Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. E7-3609 Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4210-67-P DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT [Docket No. FR-5124-N-05] Notice of Submission of Proposed Information Collection to OMB; LOCCS Voice Response System Payment Vouchers for Public and Indian Housing Programs AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing, HUD. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The proposed information collection requirement described below has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB)for review, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act. The Department is soliciting public comments on the subject proposal. HUD is requesting extension of OMB approval for the application for grant funds disbursement through the LOCCS Voice Response System. DATES: *Comments Due Date:* April 2, 2007. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding this proposal. Comments should refer to the proposal by name and/or OMB Approval Number (2577-0166) and should be sent to: Aneita Waites, Reports Liaison Officer, Public and Indian Housing, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street, SW., Room 4116, Washington, DC 20410-5000. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aneita Waites, Reports Liaison Officer, Public and Indian Housing, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street, SW., Room 4116, Washington, DC 20410-5000; e-mail *Aneita_L._Waites@HUD.gov* ; telephone
(202)402-4114. This is not a toll-free number. Copies of available documents submitted to OMB may be obtained from Ms. Waites and at HUD's Web site at *http://www5.hud.gov:63001/po/i/icbts/collectionsearch.cfm* . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This Notice informs the public that the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
(HUD)will be submitting the proposed information collection to OMB for review, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended). This Notice is soliciting comments from members of the public and affecting agencies concerning the proposed collection of information to:
(1)Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility;
(2)Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information;
(3)Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(4)Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond; including through the use of appropriate automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. This Notice Also Lists the Following Information *Title of Proposal:* LOCCS Voice Response System Payment Vouchers for Public and Indian Housing Programs. *OMB Approval Number:* 2577-0166. *Form Numbers:* HUD-50080 series. Description of the Need for the Information and its Proposed Use Grant recipients use the applicable payment information to request funds from HUD through the LOCCS/VRS voice activated system. The information collected on the payment voucher will also be used as an internal control measure to ensure the lawful and appropriate disbursement of Federal funds as well as provide a service to program recipients. *Frequency of Submission:* On occasion. Number of respondents Annual responses × Hours per response = Burden hours Reporting Burden 4,746 114,113 0.15 17,117 *Total Estimated Burden Hours:* 17,117. *Status:* Request for extension of an existing information collection. Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 35, as amended. Dated: February 16, 2007. Bessy Kong, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Policy, Program and Legislative Initiatives. [FR Doc. E7-3610 Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4210-67-P DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT [Docket No. FR-5128-N-01] Regulatory Waivers for Public Housing Programs To Assist With Transition to Asset Management AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing, HUD. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: This notice advises the public of a process for seeking expedited waivers of HUD program regulations to assist public housing agencies
(PHAs)as they convert to asset management. This notice, which concerns regulations governing HUD's Office of Public and Indian Housing (PIH), does not apply to: PHAs with less than 250 units that do not elect to convert to asset management, Indian and Tribally Designated Housing Entities (TDHEs), local tribal governments, or PHAs that administer only the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program (“Section 8-only PHAs”). The expedited regulatory waiver process applies only to waivers of PIH program regulations applicable to PHAs. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory A. Byrne, Director, Financial Management Division, Real Estate Assessment Center, Office of Public Housing Programs, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 550 12th Street, SW., Room 2202, Washington, DC 20410-5000; telephone number
(202)475-8632. Persons with hearing or speech impairments may access this number via TTY by calling the Federal Information Relay Service at
(800)877-8339. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background On September 19, 2005 (70 FR 54984), HUD published a final rule in the **Federal Register** amending the regulations of the Public Housing Operating Fund Program at 24 CFR part 990. The final rule provides a new formula for distributing operating subsidy to PHAs. The final rule also requires PHAs with 250 or more public housing units to convert to asset management; PHAs with less than 250 units may elect, but are not required, to convert. While 24 CFR part 990, as revised by the final rule, directs the conversion to asset management, it does not address all aspects of the organizational and business requirements related to converting public housing to a project-based model. PHAs and their representatives have expressed concern that the transition to asset management necessitates extensive PHA organizational changes, which may require the waiver of certain HUD regulatory requirements. Waivers of HUD regulations are handled on a case-by-case basis. Under section 7(q) of the Department of Housing and Urban Development Act (42 U.S.C. 3535(q)), a regulated party that seeks a waiver of a HUD regulation must submit a written waiver request to HUD that specifies the need for the waiver. In accordance with 24 CFR 5.110, upon determination of good cause, HUD may, subject to statutory limitations, waive provisions of title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations. HUD's authority to grant waivers is limited to non-statutory requirements. Accordingly, HUD regulations that repeat statutory requirements may not be waived. The Secretary has delegated regulatory waiver authority for PIH programs to the Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing (see the delegation of authority published on September 16, 2003 (68 FR 54240)). The Assistant Secretary will respond to all waiver requests in writing. Each quarter, HUD will publish in the **Federal Register** a summary of all waivers granted during the preceding period and the name of each applicant PHA. II. Expedited Regulatory Waiver Process This notice addresses concerns raised by PHAs by announcing an expedited process for HUD to respond to PHA requests for waivers of regulations to assist in the conversion to asset management. The waiver process announced in this notice does not suspend the normal waiver-granting process. A. Eligible PHAs PHAs converting to asset management in accordance with 24 CFR part 990 (including PHAs with less than 250 units electing to convert to asset management) are eligible to request regulatory waivers using the expedited process announced in this notice. This notice does not apply to: PHAs with less than 250 units that do not elect to convert, TDHEs, local tribal governments, or PHAs that administer only the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program (“Section 8-only PHAs”). PHAs, TDHEs, and local tribal governments ineligible to request regulatory waivers using the expedited procedures of this notice may submit waiver requests for HUD's consideration on a case-by-case basis using customary waiver procedures. B. Eligible Regulatory Requirements Under the expedited regulatory waiver procedures announced in this notice, HUD will consider requests for waivers of non-statutory PIH program regulations applicable to PHAs (as noted above, statutory requirements may not be waived). The expedited process is particularly designed to address waiver requests for non-statutory program requirements that are uniquely different from requirements applicable to operators of other HUD-subsidized housing programs. For example, while many PHAs have indicated the need to streamline the rules regarding the calculation of rent, such rules are statutory (and essentially equivalent to those that govern other HUD-subsidized housing programs, such as Section 8 project-based housing). Accordingly, HUD may not consider waiver requests for such statutory provisions. On the other hand, the current requirement that PHAs conduct annual inspections in accordance with Uniform Physical Condition Standards
(UPCS)is not statutory (nor required of operators of HUD subsidized housing) and therefore is eligible for waiver under this notice. C. Waiver Request Process Eligible PHAs that wish to obtain a regulatory waiver under the expedited process described in this notice must submit their waiver request to the following email address: *PH_Asset_Management_Expedited_Waiver_Process@hud.gov.* The e-mail request must contain the following: • A list of the HUD regulations from which the PHA specifically requests relief; • An Adobe Acrobat PDF copy of the Board Resolution approving the request for the waiver(s); • A statement of the reason
(need)and good cause for the waiver(s), which specifically addresses how the granting of the requested regulatory waiver(s) would facilitate the PHA's conversion to asset management; and • A statement that the PHA will make any necessary changes in its policies and procedures required to implement the waiver(s), if approved. Please note that, while HUD is not requiring PHAs to modify their policies and procedures prior to applying for these waivers, PHAs are to certify that they will modify them accordingly prior to implementation, if HUD approves the waiver request. To the extent that any such changes require resident and/or public notice under 24 CFR part 966 (governing public housing lease and grievance procedures), the PHA certifies to meeting those procedural requirements prior to implementation. Under part 966, modifications to rules and regulations that are required to be incorporated by reference in leases are subject to comment by affected tenants. Specifically, § 966.5 provides that PHAs “shall give at least 30-day written notice to each affected tenant setting forth the proposed modification, the reasons therefor, and providing the tenant an opportunity to present written comments which shall be taken into consideration by the PHA prior to the proposed modification becoming effective.” Under the expedited waiver process contained in this notice, HUD will review and either approve or disapprove the requests within 30 days of receipt of a complete submission package. HUD reserves the right to withhold or reject a waiver request due to a PHA's operating performance or due to other matters. III. Examples of Possible Regulatory Requirements to be Considered for Waivers The following are examples of non-statutory PIH regulatory requirements that have been identified by PHAs as possibly impacting their conversion to asset management. In addition, the following regulations are not required of operators of HUD’s subsidized housing programs. The following list of regulatory requirements is not exhaustive, but is designed to assist PHAs in identifying the types of PIH program requirements that HUD may consider waiver requests for under this notice. A. 24 CFR 902.60(d) (Management Operations and Resident Service and Satisfaction Information) HUD plans to revise the Public Housing Assessment System
(PHAS)along the lines of an asset management model, which will result in different scoring and tracking mechanisms than HUD currently utilizes. While the PHAS is mostly rooted in statute (section 6(j) of the Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437d(j)), there is no statutory requirement that PHAs submit to annual evaluations. Hence, for PHAs that request and show good cause, HUD will waive the requirement to submit a management operations certification, and will also waive the resident satisfaction survey, for a PHA's final year prior to required conversion to project-based budgeting and accounting ( *i.e.* , PHAs with fiscal years ending June 30, 2007, September 30, 2007, December 31, 2007, and March 31, 2008). HUD will not waive the independent physical inspection (conducted on all PHAs that score less than 80 on the previous year's inspection) or the requirement to submit a Financial Data Schedule (FDS). For purposes of scoring, HUD may, on a case-by-case basis, consider several alternatives that provide a PHAS score based on all four indicators, including:
(1)Carrying over the PHA's entire PHAS score from the previous year, or
(2)carrying over only the management assessment and resident satisfaction scores and tabulating new physical condition and financial condition scores. B. 24 CFR 902.43 (a)(4) (Annual Inspections) Section 6(f) of the United States Housing Act of 1937 requires PHA annual inspections. Waivers will be considered relating to the conduct of PHA annual inspections in accordance with Uniform Physical Condition Standards (UPCS). A PHA would still be required to conduct annual inspections; however, in accordance with section 6(f), it could perform those inspections in accordance with laws, standards, or state or local codes that the Secretary, upon granting the waiver, determines meet or exceed the UPCS. In requesting a waiver of the UPCS inspection requirement, the PHA must indicate the alternative inspection standards it intends to use and why such alternative standards meet or exceed the UPCS. PHAs are still subject to Real Estate Assessment Center physical inspections using UPCS at the frequency contained in 24 CFR part 902. C. 24 CFR Part 964 (Tenant Participation) Part 964 establishes various requirements for PHAs pertaining to tenant (resident) participation. HUD will consider requests for waivers relating to such issues as: the role of jurisdiction-wide resident councils (as these are not mandated by law), PHA roles in resident participation activities, requirements concerning resident council membership, election procedures, and uniform bylaws. Dated: February 22, 2007. Paula O. Blunt, General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing. [FR Doc. E7-3625 Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4210-67-P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service Receipt of an Application for an Incidental Take Permit for Construction of a Single-Family Residence in Sarasota County, FL AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the availability of an incidental take permit
(ITP)and Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP). Joseph Pansulla (Applicant) requests an incidental take permit
(ITP)pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (U.S.C. 1531 *et seq.* ), as amended (Act). The Applicant anticipates taking about 0.79 acre of Florida scrub-jay ( *Aphelocoma coerulescens* )(scrub-jay) foraging, sheltering, and possibly nesting habitat, incidental to lot preparation for the construction of a single-family residence and supporting infrastructure in Sarasota County, Florida (Project). The destruction of 0.79 acre of foraging and sheltering habitat is expected to result in the take of one family of scrub-jays. The Applicant's Habitat Conservation Plan
(HCP)describes the mitigation and minimization measures proposed to address the effects of the Projects to the Florida scrub-jay. DATES: Written comments on the ITP application and HCP should be sent to the South Florida Ecological Services Office (see ADDRESSES ) and should be received on or before April 2, 2007. ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to review the application and HCP may obtain a copy by writing the Service's South Florida Ecological Services Office. Please reference permit number TE143178-0 in such requests. Documents will also be available for public inspection by appointment during normal business hours at the South Florida Ecological Services Office, 1339 20th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Trish Adams, Fish and Wildlife Biologist, South Florida Ecological Services Office, Vero Beach, Florida (see ADDRESSES ), telephone: 772/562-3909, ext. 232. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If you wish to comment, you may submit comments by any one of several methods. Please reference Pansulla SFL HCP in such requests. You may mail comments to the Service's South Florida Ecological Services Office (see ADDRESSES ). You may also comment via the Internet to *trish_adams@fws.gov.* Please also include your name and return address in your internet message. If you do not receive a confirmation from us that we have received your internet message, contact us directly at the telephone number listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT . Finally, you may hand deliver comments to the Service office listed under ADDRESSES . Our practice is to make comments, including names and home addresses of respondents, available for public review during regular business hours. Individual respondents may request that we withhold their home address from the administrative record. We will honor such requests to the extent allowable by law. There may also be other circumstances in which we would withhold from the administrative record a respondent's identity, as allowable by law. If you wish us to withhold your name and address, you must state this prominently at the beginning of your comments. We will not, however, consider anonymous comments. We will make all submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or businesses, available for public inspection in their entirety. Residential construction for the Pansulla SFL HCP will take place within Section 15, Township 40, Range 19, Englewood, Sarasota County, Florida, on 1 lot. This lot is within scrub-jay occupied habitat. The lot encompasses about 1.22 acres, and the footprint of the homes, infrastructure, and landscaping preclude retention on 0.79 acre of scrub-jay habitat on this lot. In order to minimize take on site the Applicant proposes to mitigate for the loss of 0.79 acre of scrub-jay habitat by contributing a total of $40,000.00 to the Florida Scrub-jay Conservation Fund administered by The Nature Conservancy. The Florida Scrub-jay Conservation Fund is earmarked for use in the conservation and recovery of scrub-jays and may include habitat acquisition, restoration, and/or management. The Service has determined that the Applicant's proposal, including the proposed mitigation and minimization measures, will individually and cumulatively have a minor or negligible effect on the species covered in the HCP. Therefore, the ITP is a “low-effect” project and qualifies as a categorical exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), as provided by the Department of the Interior Manual (516 DM 2, Appendix 1 and 516 DM 6, Appendix 1). This preliminary information may be revised based on our review of public comments that we receive in response to this notice. Low-effect HCPs are those involving
(1)minor or negligible effects on federally listed or candidate species and their habitats, and
(2)minor or negligible effects on other environmental values or resources. The Service will evaluate the HCP and comments submitted thereon to determine whether the application meets the requirements of section 10(a) of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If it is determined that those requirements are met, the ITP will be issued for the incidental take of the Florida scrub-jay. The Service will also evaluate whether issuance of the section 10(a)(1)(B) ITP complies with section 7 of the Act by conducting an intra-Service section 7 consultation. The results of this consultation, in combination with the above findings, will be used in the final analysis to determine whether or not to issue the ITP. Authority: This notice is provided pursuant to Section 10 of the Endangered Species Act and NEPA regulations (40 CFR 1506.6). Dated: February 23, 2007. Paul Souza, Field Supervisor, South Florida Ecological Services Office. [FR Doc. E7-3573 Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310-55-P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management [ID-400-1210-MD-241A] Notice of Public Meeting, Coeur d'Alene District Resource Advisory Council Meeting; Idaho AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior. ACTION: Notice of public meeting. SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management
(BLM)Coeur d'Alene District Resource Advisory Council
(RAC)will meet as indicated below. DATES: April 3, 2007. The meeting will start at 10 a.m. and end no later than 4 p.m. The public comment period will be from 1 p.m. to 1:30 p.m. The meeting will be held at the Idaho Commerce and Labor Career Center office located at 1350 Troy Road in Moscow, Idaho. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephanie Snook, RAC Coordinator, BLM Coeur d'Alene District, 3815 Schreiber Way, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83815 or telephone
(208)769-5004. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 15-member Council advises the Secretary of the Interior, through the Bureau of Land Management, on a variety of planning and management issues associated with public land management in Idaho. The agenda will include the following topics: Election of Officers, recreation site planning and fee proposal process and recreation subcommittees. Additional topics may be added and will be included in local media announcements. More information is available at *http://www.blm.gov/rac/id/id_index.htm* . All meetings are open to the public. The public may present written comments to the Council in advance of or at the meeting. Each formal Council meeting will also have time allocated for receiving public comments. Depending on the number of persons wishing to comment and time available, the time for individual oral comments may be limited. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact the BLM as provided above. Dated: February 23, 2007. Stephanie Snook, Acting District Manager. [FR Doc. E7-3562 Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731-TA-922 (Review)] Automotive Replacement Glass Windshields From China AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Institution of a five-year review concerning the antidumping duty order on automotive replacement glass windshields from China. SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted a review pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on automotive replacement glass windshields from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission; 1 to be assured of consideration, the deadline for responses is April 20, 2007. Comments on the adequacy of responses may be filed with the Commission by May 14, 2007. For further information concerning the conduct of this review and rules of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). 1 No response to this request for information is required if a currently valid Office of Management and Budget
(OMB)number is not displayed; the OMB number is 3117-0016/USITC No. 07-5-167, expiration date June 30, 2008. Public reporting burden for the request is estimated to average 10 hours per response. Please send comments regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. DATES: *Effective Date:* March 1, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202-205-3193), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server ( *http://www.usitc.gov* ). The public record for this review may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket
(EDIS)at *http://edis.usitc.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: *Background.* On April 4, 2002, the Department of Commerce issued an antidumping duty order on imports of automotive replacement glass windshields from China (67 FR 16087). The Commission is conducting a review to determine whether revocation of the order would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to the domestic industry within a reasonably foreseeable time. It will assess the adequacy of interested party responses to this notice of institution to determine whether to conduct a full review or an expedited review. The Commission's determination in any expedited review will be based on the facts available, which may include information provided in response to this notice. *Definitions.—The following definitions apply to this review:*
(1)*Subject Merchandise* is the class or kind of merchandise that is within the scope of the five-year review, as defined by the Department of Commerce.
(2)The *Subject Country* in this review is China.
(3)The *Domestic Like Product* is the domestically produced product or products which are like, or in the absence of like, most similar in characteristics and uses with, the Subject Merchandise. In its original determination, the Commission found one Domestic Like Product coextensive with the scope consisting of automotive replacement glass windshields. One Commissioner defined the Domestic Like Product differently.
(4)The *Domestic Industry* is the U.S. producers as a whole of the Domestic Like Product, or those producers whose collective output of the Domestic Like Product constitutes a major proportion of the total domestic production of the product. In its original determination, the Commission defined the Domestic Industry as all domestic producers of automotive replacement glass windshields. One Commissioner defined the Domestic Industry differently.
(5)The *Order Date* is the date that the antidumping duty order under review became effective. In this review, the Order Date is April 4, 2002.
(6)An *Importer* is any person or firm engaged, either directly or through a parent company or subsidiary, in importing the Subject Merchandise into the United States from a foreign manufacturer or through its selling agent. *Participation in the review and public service list.* Persons, including industrial users of the Subject Merchandise and, if the merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer organizations, wishing to participate in the review as parties must file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as provided in section 201.11(b)(4) of the Commission's rules, no later than 21 days after publication of this notice in the **Federal Register** . The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the review. Former Commission employees who are seeking to appear in Commission five-year reviews are reminded that they are required, pursuant to 19 CFR 201.15, to seek Commission approval if the matter in which they are seeking to appear was pending in any manner or form during their Commission employment. The Commission's designated agency ethics official has advised that a five-year review is the “same particular matter” as the underlying original investigation for purposes of 19 CFR 201.15 and 18 U.S.C. 207, the post employment statute for Federal employees. Former employees may seek informal advice from Commission ethics officials with respect to this and the related issue of whether the employee's participation was “personal and substantial.” However, any informal consultation will not relieve former employees of the obligation to seek approval to appear from the Commission under its rule 201.15. For ethics advice, contact Carol McCue Verratti, Deputy Agency Ethics Official, at 202-205-3088. *Limited disclosure of business proprietary information
(BPI)under an administrative protective order
(APO)and APO service list.* Pursuant to section 207.7(a) of the Commission's rules, the Secretary will make BPI submitted in this review available to authorized applicants under the APO issued in the review, provided that the application is made no later than 21 days after publication of this notice in the **Federal Register** . Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the review. A separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO. *Certification.* Pursuant to section 207.3 of the Commission's rules, any person submitting information to the Commission in connection with this review must certify that the information is accurate and complete to the best of the submitter's knowledge. In making the certification, the submitter will be deemed to consent, unless otherwise specified, for the Commission, its employees, and contract personnel to use the information provided in any other reviews or investigations of the same or comparable products which the Commission conducts under Title VII of the Act, or in internal audits and investigations relating to the programs and operations of the Commission pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3. *Written submissions.* Pursuant to section 207.61 of the Commission's rules, each interested party response to this notice must provide the information specified below. The deadline for filing such responses is April 20, 2007. Pursuant to section 207.62(b) of the Commission's rules, eligible parties (as specified in Commission rule 207.62(b)(1)) may also file comments concerning the adequacy of responses to the notice of institution and whether the Commission should conduct an expedited or full review. The deadline for filing such comments is May 14, 2007. All written submissions must conform with the provisions of sections 201.8 and 207.3 of the Commission's rules and any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the requirements of sections 201.6 and 207.7 of the Commission's rules. The Commission's rules do not authorize filing of submissions with the Secretary by facsimile or electronic means, except to the extent permitted by section 201.8 of the Commission's rules, as amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8, 2002). Also, in accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission's rules, each document filed by a party to the review must be served on all other parties to the review (as identified by either the public or APO service list as appropriate), and a certificate of service must accompany the document (if you are not a party to the review you do not need to serve your response). *Inability to provide requested information.* Pursuant to section 207.61(c) of the Commission's rules, any interested party that cannot furnish the information requested by this notice in the requested form and manner shall notify the Commission at the earliest possible time, provide a full explanation of why it cannot provide the requested information, and indicate alternative forms in which it can provide equivalent information. If an interested party does not provide this notification (or the Commission finds the explanation provided in the notification inadequate) and fails to provide a complete response to this notice, the Commission may take an adverse inference against the party pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act in making its determination in the review. *Information to Be Provided in Response to this Notice of Institution:* As used below, the term “firm” includes any related firms.
(1)The name and address of your firm or entity (including World Wide Web address if available) and name, telephone number, fax number, and E-mail address of the certifying official.
(2)A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product, a U.S. union or worker group, a U.S. importer of the Subject Merchandise, a foreign producer or exporter of the Subject Merchandise, a U.S. or foreign trade or business association, or another interested party (including an explanation). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business association, identify the firms in which your workers are employed or which are members of your association.
(3)A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is willing to participate in this review by providing information requested by the Commission.
(4)A statement of the likely effects of the revocation of the antidumping duty order on the Domestic Industry in general and/or your firm/entity specifically. In your response, please discuss the various factors specified in section 752(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675a(a)) including the likely volume of subject imports, likely price effects of subject imports, and likely impact of imports of Subject Merchandise on the Domestic Industry.
(5)A list of all known and currently operating U.S. producers of the Domestic Like Product. Identify any known related parties and the nature of the relationship as defined in section 771(4)(B) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1677(4)(B)).
(6)A list of all known and currently operating U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise and producers of the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country that currently export or have exported Subject Merchandise to the United States or other countries since the Order Date.
(7)If you are a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product, provide the following information on your firm's operations on that product during calendar year 2006 (report quantity data in units and value data in U.S. dollars, f.o.b. plant). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms in which your workers are employed/which are members of your association.
(a)Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total U.S. production of the Domestic Like Product accounted for by your firm's(s') production;
(b)The quantity and value of U.S. commercial shipments of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s); and
(c)The quantity and value of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s).
(8)If you are a U.S. importer or a trade/business association of U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise from the Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm's(s') operations on that product during calendar year 2006 (report quantity data in units and value data in U.S. dollars). If you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association.
(a)The quantity and value (landed, duty-paid but not including antidumping or countervailing duties) of U.S. imports and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total U.S. imports of Subject Merchandise from the Subject Country accounted for by your firm's(s') imports;
(b)The quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping and/or countervailing duties) of U.S. commercial shipments of Subject Merchandise imported from the Subject Country; and
(c)The quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping and/or countervailing duties) of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of Subject Merchandise imported from the Subject Country.
(9)If you are a producer, an exporter, or a trade/business association of producers or exporters of the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm's(s') operations on that product during calendar year 2006 (report quantity data in units and value data in U.S. dollars, landed and duty-paid at the U.S. port but not including antidumping or countervailing duties). If you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association.
(a)Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total production of Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country accounted for by your firm's(s') production; and
(b)The quantity and value of your firm's(s') exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise from the Subject Country accounted for by your firm's(s') exports.
(10)Identify significant changes, if any, in the supply and demand conditions or business cycle for the Domestic Like Product that have occurred in the United States or in the market for the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country since the Order Date, and significant changes, if any, that are likely to occur within a reasonably foreseeable time. Supply conditions to consider include technology; production methods; development efforts; ability to increase production (including the shift of production facilities used for other products and the use, cost, or availability of major inputs into production); and factors related to the ability to shift supply among different national markets (including barriers to importation in foreign markets or changes in market demand abroad). Demand conditions to consider include end uses and applications; the existence and availability of substitute products; and the level of competition among the Domestic Like Product produced in the United States, Subject Merchandise produced in the Subject Country, and such merchandise from other countries.
(11)(OPTIONAL) A statement of whether you agree with the above definitions of the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry; if you disagree with either or both of these definitions, please explain why and provide alternative definitions. *Authority:* This review is being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.61 of the Commission's rules. Issued: February 22, 2007. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E7-3536 Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020-02-P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. DR-CAFTA-103-016] Probable Economic Effect of Modifications to DR-CAFTA Rules of Origin and Tariffs for Certain Apparel Goods AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Clarification of scope of investigation, change in title, and extension of deadline for filing written submissions. SUMMARY: The title of the investigation as published in the **Federal Register** on February 9, 2007 (72 FR 7455) suggests that the Commission will provide advice limited to the probable economic effect of modification of certain rules of origin in the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement for certain apparel goods of Costa Rica and the Dominican Republic only. However, the text of the notice indicates that the Commission will provide such advice with respect to the probable economic effect of modification of the rules of origin on such apparel goods of all the parties to the agreement. The Commission's intent to is provide the broader advice. Accordingly, the title of the investigation is amended to delete “of Costa Rica and the Dominican Republic.” To allow additional time for any interested parties who may have been confused by the title, the Commission has extended the deadline for filing written submissions in this investigation from March 2, 2007 to March 16, 2007. All other information in the notice published on February 9, 2007, including with respect to Commission contacts, background information, and requirements for submitting written statements (except for the deadline) remains the same. Issued: February 23, 2007. By order of the Commission. Marilyn Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E7-3539 Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020-02-P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337-TA-595] In the Matter of Certain Dynamic Random Access Memory Devices and Products Containing Same; Notice of Investigation AGENCY: International Trade Commission. ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on January 29, 2007, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Renesas Technology Corp., of Tokyo, Japan. A supplemental letter was filed on February 16, 2007. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain dynamic random access memory devices and products containing same by reason of infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,115,344 and 7,116,128. The complaint, as supplemented, further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a permanent exclusion order and permanent cease and desist orders. ADDRESSES: The complaint and supplement, except for any confidential information contained therein, are available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at *http://www.usitc.gov* . The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket
(EDIS)at *http://edis.usitc.gov* . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heidi E. Strain, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone
(202)205-2560. *Authority:* The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2006). *Scope of Investigation:* Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on February 22, 2007, *ordered that* —
(1)Pursuant to subsection
(b)of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain dynamic random access memory devices and products containing same by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1 and 8 of U.S. Patent No. 7,115,344 and claims 1 and 5 of U.S. Patent No. 7,116,128, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2)For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served:
(a)The complainant is— Renesas Technology Corp., Marunouchi Building, 4-1, Marunouchi 2-chome, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-6334.
(b)The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Main Building, 250, Taepyeongno 2-ga, Jung-ga, Seoul 100-742, Korea. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 105 Challenger Road, Ridgefield Park, New Jersey.
(c)The Commission investigative attorney, party to this investigation, is Heidi E. Strain, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 401-R, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3)For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Paul J. Luckern is designated as the presiding administrative law judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of a limited exclusion order or cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. Issued: February 23, 2007. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E7-3585 Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020-02-P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337-TA-585] In the Matter of Certain Engines, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review ALJ Order No. 6 Granting Complainant's Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation by Adding a Respondent AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (“ID”) of the presiding administrative law judge (“ALJ”) (Order No. 6) granting complainant's motion to amend the complaint and the notice of investigation to add respondent Wuxi Kama Power Co. Ltd. to the investigation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-3152. Copies of the ID and all other nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server ( *http://www.usitc.gov* ). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket
(EDIS)at *http://edis.usitc.gov* . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 19, 2006, the Commission instituted an investigation under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based on a complaint filed by American Honda Motor Company, Inc. of Torrance, California, alleging a violation of section 337 in the importation, sale for importation, and sale within the United States after importation of certain engines, components thereof, and products containing the same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,706,769 and 6,250,273. 71 FR 61799 (Oct. 19, 2006). The complainant named Wuxi Kipor Power Co., Ltd. of Jiangsu, China as a respondent. On January 24, 2007, the ALJ issued Order No. 6 granting complainant's motion to amend the complaint and the notice of investigation to add Wuxi Kama Power Co. Ltd. as a respondent to the investigation. No party petitioned for review of Order No. 6, and the Commission has determined not to review it. The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 210.42(h) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42(h)). By order of the Commission. Issued: February 23, 2007. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E7-3587 Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020-02-P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337-TA-556] In the Matter of Certain High-Brightness Light Emitting Diodes and Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission Decision To Review-in-Part a Final Initial Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337 and To Grant a Motion To Strike AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to review-in-part a final initial determination (“ID”) of the presiding administrative law judge (“ALJ”) finding a violation of section 337 by the respondent's products in the above-captioned investigation. The Commission has also granted respondent's motion to strike complainant's arguments that are based on evidence that was excluded by the ALJ. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202)708-5468. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202)205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at *http://www.usitc.gov.* The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket
(EDIS)at *http://edis.usitc.gov.* Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on
(202)205-1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on December 8, 2005, based on a complaint filed by Lumileds Lighting U.S., LLC (“Lumileds”) of San Jose, California. 70 FR 73026. The complaint, as amended and supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain high-brightness light emitting diodes (“LEDs”) and products containing same by reason of infringement of claims 1 and 6 of U.S. Patent No. 5,008,718 (“the ‘718 patent”); claims 1-3, 8-9, 16, 18, and 23-28 of U.S. Patent No. 5,376,580 (“the ‘580 patent”); and claims 12-16 of U.S. Patent No. 5,502,316 (“the ‘316 patent”). The complaint further alleges the existence of a domestic industry. The Commission's notice of investigation named Epistar Corporation (“Epistar”) of Hsinchu, Taiwan, and United Epitaxy Company (“UEC”) of Hsinchu, Taiwan as respondents. On April 28, 2006, Lumileds moved to amend the complaint to:
(1)Remove UEC as a named respondent,
(2)change the complainant's full name from Lumileds Lighting U.S., LLC to Philips Lumileds Lighting Company LLC (“Philips”), and
(3)identify additional Epistar LEDs alleged to infringe one or more patents-in-suit. Neither respondent opposed the motion. On May 15, 2006, the Commission issued a notice determining not to review an ID (Order No. 14) granting the complainant's motion for partial summary determination to dismiss Epistar's affirmative defense that the ‘718 claims are invalid. On August 2, 2006, the still pending motion to amend the complaint was discussed with the parties during the prehearing conference, and the evidentiary hearing was held from August 2-11, 2006. On October 23, 2006, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 29) granting Lumileds' motion to amend the complaint, and further ordering that the Notice of Investigation be amended to identify Philips as the complainant and to remove UEC as a named respondent. On November 13, 2006, the Commission published a notice determining not to review Order No. 29. 71 F R 66195. On December 13, 2006, the Commission issued a notice determining not to review an ID (Order No. 31) extending the target date for this investigation to May 8, 2007, and the deadline for the ALJ's final initial determination to January 8, 2007. On January 8 and 11, 2007, the ALJ issued his final ID and recommended determinations on remedy and bonding, respectively. The ALJ found a violation of section 337 based on his findings that the respondent's accused products infringe one or more of the asserted claims of the patents at issue. On January 22, 2007, the complainant and the respondent each filed a petition for review of the final ID. On January 29, 2007, all parties, including the Commission investigative attorney, filed responses to the petitions for review. Upon considering the parties' filings, the Commission has determined to review-in-part the ID. Specifically, with respect to the ‘718 patent, the Commission has determined to review claim construction of the terms “substrate” and “semiconductor substrate” in claims 1 and 6, and the ALJ's determination that Epistar's GB I, GB II, OMA I, and OMA II LEDs do not infringe the ‘718 patent. With respect to the ‘580 and ‘316 patents, the Commission has determined to review claim construction of the term “wafer bonding” in claims 1-3, 8-9, 16, 18, 23-25, 27 and 28 of the ‘580 patent and claims 12-14 and 16 of the ‘'316 patent. The Commission has determined not to review the remainder of the ID. On January 25, 2007, the respondent filed a motion to strike certain portions of complainant's petition for review. The Commission has determined to grant this motion to the extent that it concerns arguments that are based on evidence excluded by the ALJ. On review, with respect to violation, the parties are requested to submit briefing limited to the following issues: the ALJ's addition of the limitation “must also be a material that provides adequate mechanical support for the LED device” to the construction of the term “substrate,” and the implications of this addition for the infringement analysis. In addressing these issues, the parties are requested to cite relevant authority. In connection with the final disposition of this investigation, the Commission may issue an order that results in the exclusion of the subject articles from entry into the United States. Accordingly, the Commission is interested in receiving written submissions that address the form of remedy, if any, that should be ordered. If a party seeks exclusion of an article from entry into the United States for purposes other than entry for consumption, the party should so indicate and provide information establishing that activities involving other types of entry either are adversely affecting it or likely to do so. For background, see In the Matter of Certain Devices for Connecting Computers via Telephone Lines, Inv. No. 337-TA-360, USITC Pub. No. 2843 (December 1994) (Commission Opinion). When the Commission contemplates some form of remedy, it must consider the effects of that remedy upon the public interest. The factors the Commission will consider include the effect that an exclusion order and/or cease and desist orders would have on
(1)The public health and welfare,
(2)competitive conditions in the U.S. economy,
(3)U.S. production of articles that are like or directly competitive with those that are subject to investigation, and
(4)U.S. consumers. The Commission is therefore interested in receiving written submissions that address the aforementioned public interest factors in the context of this investigation. When the Commission orders some form of remedy, the U.S. Trade Representative, as delegated by the President, has 60 days to approve or disapprove the Commission's action. See Presidential Memorandum of July 21, 2005, 70 FR 43251 (July 26, 2005). During this period, the subject articles would be entitled to enter the United States under bond, in an amount determined by the Commission and prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury. The Commission is therefore interested in receiving submissions concerning the amount of the bond that should be imposed if a remedy is ordered. *Written Submissions:* The written submissions reference above should be concise and thoroughly referenced to the record in this investigation. Also, parties to the investigation, interested government agencies, and any other interested parties are encouraged to file written submissions on the issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding. Such submissions should be no more than twenty-five
(25)pages and should address the recommended determination by the ALJ on remedy and bonding. The complainant and the Commission investigative attorney are also requested to submit proposed remedial orders for the Commission's consideration. Complainants are also requested to state the dates that the patents at issue expire and the HTSUS numbers under which the accused products are imported. All of the written submissions and proposed remedial orders must be filed no later than close of business on March 5, 2007. Reply submissions must be filed no later than the close of business on March 12. No further submissions on these issues will be permitted unless otherwise ordered by the Commission. Persons filing written submissions must file the original document and 12 true copies thereof on or before the deadlines stated above with the Office of the Secretary. Any person desiring to submit a document to the Commission in confidence must request confidential treatment unless the information has already been granted such treatment during the proceedings. All such requests should be directed to the Secretary of the Commission and must include a full statement of the reasons why the Commission should grant such treatment. See 19 CFR 210.6. Documents for which confidential treatment by the Commission is sought will be treated accordingly. All nonconfidential written submissions will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Secretary. The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in sections 210.42-46 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.42-46. Issued: February 22, 2007. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E7-3541 Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020-02-P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337-TA-565] In the Matter of Certain Ink Cartridges and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination Not to Review an Initial Determination Amending the Complaint and Notice of Investigation to Add a Respondent and Then Terminating the Respondent on the Basis of a Settlement Agreement, Consent Order Stipulation and Consent Order; Issuance of Consent Order AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (“ID”) of the presiding administrative law judge (“ALJ”) in the above-captioned investigation amending the complaint and notice of investigation to add a respondent and then terminating the investigation with respect to that respondent on the basis of a settlement agreement, consent order stipulation, and consent order. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael K. Haldenstein, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202)205-3041. Copies of the public version of the ALJ's ID and all other nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server ( *http://www.usitc.gov* ). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket
(EDIS)at *http://edis.usitc.gov.* Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on March 23, 2006, based on a complaint filed by Epson Portland, Inc. of Oregon; Epson America, Inc. of California; and Seiko Epson Corporation of Japan. 71 FR 14720 (March 23, 2006). The complaint, as amended, alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain ink cartridges and components thereof by reason of infringement of claim 7 of U.S. Patent No. 5,615,957; claims 18, 81, 93, 149, 164, and 165 of U.S. Patent No. 5,622,439; claims 83 and 84 of U.S. Patent No. 5,158,377; claims 19 and 20 of U.S. Patent No. 5,221,148; claims 29, 31, 34, and 38 of U.S. Patent No. 5,156,472; claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 5,488,401; claims 1-3 and 9 of U.S. Patent No. 6,502,917; claims 1, 31, and 34 of U.S. Patent No. 6,550,902; claims 1, 10, and 14 of U.S. Patent No. 6,955,422; claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 7,008,053; and claims 21, 45, 53, and 54 of U.S. Patent No. 7,011,397. The complaint further alleged that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainants requested that the Commission issue a general exclusion order and cease and desist orders. The Commission named as respondents 24 companies located in China, Germany, Hong Kong, Korea, and the United States. The ALJ set June 25, 2007, as the target date for completion of the investigation. On January 9, 2007, complainants and proposed respondent Rhinotek Computer Products, Inc. (“RCPI”) filed a joint motion seeking to amend the complaint and notice of investigation to add RCPI as a respondent in the investigation and then to terminate the investigation with respect to RCPI based upon a settlement agreement, consent order stipulation, and proposed consent order. RCPI is the successor-in-interest to respondent Gerald Chamales Corporation (d/b/a/ Rhinotek Computer Products). The Commission investigative attorney supported the motion in a response dated January 26, 2007. No other parties responded to the motion. On January 30, 2007, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 30) amending the complaint and notice of investigation to add RCPI to the investigation and then terminating the investigation with respect to RCPI on the basis of a settlement agreement, consent order stipulation, and proposed consent order. No petitions for review of the ID were filed and the Commission has determined not to review the ID. This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and Commission rules 210.14, 210.21 and 210.42, 19 CFR 210.14, 210.21, 210.42. Issued: February 22, 2007. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E7-3537 Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020-02-P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 731-TA-919 and 920 (Review)] Welded Large Diameter Line Pipe From Japan and Mexico AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Scheduling of full five-year reviews concerning the antidumping duty orders on welded large diameter line pipe from Japan and Mexico. SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of full reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty orders on welded large diameter line pipe from Japan and Mexico would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). DATES: *Effective Date:* February 22, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dana Lofgren (202-205-3185), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server ( *http://www.usitc.gov* ). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket
(EDIS)at *http://edis.usitc.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: *Background.* —On February 5, 2007, the Commission determined that both the domestic interested party group response and the respondent group response to its notice of institution (71 FR 64294, November 1, 2006) of the subject five-year reviews were adequate. Accordingly, the Commission determined that it would conduct full reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act (72 FR 6746, February 13, 2007). A record of the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements are available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission's Web site. *Participation in the reviews and public service list.* —Persons, including industrial users of the subject merchandise and, if the merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer organizations, wishing to participate in these reviews as parties must file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as provided in section 201.11 of the Commission's rules, by 45 days after publication of this notice. A party that filed a notice of appearance following publication of the Commission's notice of institution of the reviews need not file an additional notice of appearance. The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the reviews. *Limited disclosure of business proprietary information
(BPI)under an administrative protective order
(APO)and BPI service list.* —Pursuant to section 207.7(a) of the Commission's rules, the Secretary will make BPI gathered in these reviews available to authorized applicants under the APO issued in the reviews, provided that the application is made by 45 days after publication of this notice. Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as defined by 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the reviews. A party granted access to BPI following publication of the Commission's notice of institution of the reviews need not reapply for such access. A separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO. *Staff report.* —The prehearing staff report in these reviews will be placed in the nonpublic record on July 9, 2007, and a public version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.64 of the Commission's rules. *Hearing.* —The Commission will hold a hearing in connection with the reviews beginning at 9:30 a.m. on July 26, 2007, at the U.S. International Trade Commission Building. Requests to appear at the hearing should be filed in writing with the Secretary to the Commission on or before July 18, 2007. A nonparty who has testimony that may aid the Commission's deliberations may request permission to present a short statement at the hearing. All parties and nonparties desiring to appear at the hearing and make oral presentations should attend a prehearing conference to be held at 9:30 a.m. on July 23, 2007, at the U.S. International Trade Commission Building. Oral testimony and written materials to be submitted at the public hearing are governed by sections 201.6(b)(2), 201.13(f), 207.24, and 207.66 of the Commission's rules. Parties must submit any request to present a portion of their hearing testimony *in camera* no later than 7 business days prior to the date of the hearing. *Written submissions.* —Each party to the reviews may submit a prehearing brief to the Commission. Prehearing briefs must conform with the provisions of section 207.65 of the Commission's rules; the deadline for filing is July 18, 2007. Parties may also file written testimony in connection with their presentation at the hearing, as provided in section 207.24 of the Commission's rules, and posthearing briefs, which must conform with the provisions of section 207.67 of the Commission's rules. The deadline for filing posthearing briefs is August 21, 2007; witness testimony must be filed no later than three days before the hearing. In addition, any person who has not entered an appearance as a party to the reviews may submit a written statement of information pertinent to the subject of the reviews on or before August 21, 2007. On September 24, 2007, the Commission will make available to parties all information on which they have not had an opportunity to comment. Parties may submit final comments on this information on or before September 26, 2007, but such final comments must not contain new factual information and must otherwise comply with section 207.68 of the Commission's rules. All written submissions must conform with the provisions of section 201.8 of the Commission's rules; any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission's rules. The Commission's rules do not authorize filing of submissions with the Secretary by facsimile or electronic means, except to the extent permitted by section 201.8 of the Commission's rules, as amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8, 2002). Even where electronic filing of a document is permitted, certain documents must also be filed in paper form, as specified in II
(C)of the Commission's Handbook on Electronic Filing Procedures, 67 FR 68168, 68173 (November 8, 2002). Additional written submissions to the Commission, including requests pursuant to section 201.12 of the Commission's rules, shall not be accepted unless good cause is shown for accepting such submissions, or unless the submission is pursuant to a specific request by a Commissioner or Commission staff. In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission's rules, each document filed by a party to the reviews must be served on all other parties to the reviews (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules. Issued: February 23, 2007. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E7-3542 Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020-02-P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337-TA-493 (Remand)] In the Matter of Certain Zero-Mercury-Added Alkaline Batteries, Parts Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission Decision To Terminate Remanded Investigation With a Finding of No Violation AGENCY: International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to terminate the above-captioned remanded investigation with a finding of no violation of section 337. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christal Sheppard, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202)708-2301. Copies of the ALJ's ID and all other nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server ( *http://www.usitc.gov* ). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket
(EDIS)at *http://edis.usitc.gov.* Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on June 2, 2003, based on a complaint filed by Energizer Holdings, Inc. and Eveready Battery Company, Inc. (collectively, “EBC”), both of St. Louis, Missouri. 68 FR 32771 (June 2, 2003). The complaint, as supplemented, alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain zero-mercury-added alkaline batteries, parts thereof, and products containing same by reason of infringement of claims 1-12 of U.S. Patent No. 5,464,709 (“the '709 patent”). The complaint and notice of investigation named 26 respondents and were later amended to include an additional firm as a respondent. The investigation has been terminated as to claims 8-12 of the '709 patent. Several respondents have been terminated from the investigation for various reasons. On October 1, 2004, the Commission issued notice in the original investigation that it had determined to terminate the investigation with a finding of no violation of section 337 on the basis that the asserted claims of the '709 patent were invalid for indefiniteness. EBC appealed the Commission's final determination to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”). On January 25, 2006, the Federal Circuit issued its decision in the appeal, reversing the Commission's final determination and remanding the investigation to the Commission. *Energizer Holdings, Inc.* v. *International Trade Commission,* 435 F.3d 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2006). The Federal Circuit issued its mandate on March 20, 2006. On April 14, 2006, the Commission issued an order directing all parties to the investigation to provide comments on how this investigation should proceed, including comments on whether and to what extent the investigation should be remanded to the ALJ. Having considered the record in this investigation, including the comments received pursuant to the Commission's order of April 14, 2006, the Commission has determined to terminate this investigation with a finding of no violation of section 337. Specifically, the Commission has determined that the asserted claims are invalid for failure to meet the written description requirement and that, if valid, they are not infringed by respondents' products. Vice Chairman Aranoff and Commissioner Lane dissented from the Commission's final determination. This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and sections 210.41-.51 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.41-.51). Issued: February 23, 2007. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E7-3583 Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020-02-P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Lodging of Stipulation and Order Pursuant to Safe Drinking Water Act and Resource Recovery and Conservation Act Notice is hereby given that on February 12, 2007, a proposed settlement in *United States* v. *Martin Ain,* Civil No. 04-2912, has been lodged with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. In this action, the United States sued Ain for violations of the Safe Drinking Water Act (“SDWA”), 42 U.S.C. 300h, *et seq.,* and the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 (“RCRA”), 42 U.S.C. 6901 *et seq.,* in connection with the injection of fluids into wells on a property located at 257/259 Main Street, Town of Hempstead, New York, the failure to determine if contaminated soils and sludges were hazardous wastes and the failure to respond adequately to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency information requests. Ain has come into compliance with SDWA and RCRA. The settlement requires Ain to pay a civil penalty of $80,000. The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty
(30)days from the date of this publication comments relating to the settlement. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environmental and Natural Resources Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611, and should refer to *U.S.* v. *Martin Ain,* D.J. Ref. 90-5-1-1-07662. The settlement may be examined at the Office of the United States Attorney, Eastern District of New York, 610 Federal Plaza, Central Islip, New York 11722, and at the Region II Office of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region II Records Center, 290 Broadway, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10007-1866. During the public comment period, the settlement may also be examined on the following Department of Justice Web site: *http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_Decrees.html.* A copy of the settlement may also be obtained by mail from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia Fleetwood ( *tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov* ), fax no.
(202)514-0097, phone confirmation number
(202)514-1547. In requesting a copy from the Consent Decree Library, please enclose a check in the amount of $2.00 (25 cents per page production cost) payable to the U.S. Treasury or, if by e-mail or fax, forward a check in that amount to the Consent Decree Library at the stated address. Ronald Gluck, Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environmental and Natural Resources Division. [FR Doc. 07-908 Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 22
Traces to 22 documents
U.S. Code
- Assignment of tasks and deadlines§ 3505
- Administrative provisions§ 3535
- Contract provisions and requirements; loans and annual contributions§ 1437d
- Congressional findings and declaration of purposes and policy§ 1531
- Administrative review of determinations§ 1675
- Restrictions on former officers, employees, and elected officials of the executive and legislative branches§ 207
- Definitions; special rules§ 1677
- Special rules for section 1675(b) and 1675(c) reviews§ 1675a
- Unfair practices in import trade§ 1337
- Regulations for State programs§ 300h
- Congressional findings§ 6901
CFR
- Waivers.§ 5.110
- Data collection.§ 902.60
- Management operations performance standards.§ 902.43
- Attorneys and others practicing or appearing before the Commission.§ 201.15
- Institution of investigation.§ 210.10
- The response.§ 210.13
- Service of process and other documents.§ 201.16
- Initial determinations.§ 210.42
- Computation of time, additional hearings, postponements, continuances, and extensions of time.§ 210.6
- Amendments to pleadings and notice; supplemental submissions; counterclaims; severance and consolidation of investigations.§ 210.14
- Termination of investigation.§ 210.41
11 references not yet in our index
- Pub. L. 104-13
- 44 USC 35
- 24 CFR 990
- 24 CFR 966
- 24 CFR 902
- 24 CFR 964
- 40 CFR 1506.6
- 19 CFR 201
- 19 CFR 207
- 19 CFR 210.42-46
- 435 F.3d 1366
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice and request for comments
F. App'x435 F.3d 1366
Pub. L.Pub. L. 104-13
Cite44 USC 35
Cites 33 · showing 12Cited by 0 across 0 sources