Notices. Notice

9,534 words·~43 min read·/register/2007/02/27/07-896

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4310-05-M INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337-TA-559] In the Matter of Certain Digital Processors and Digital Processing Systems, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant's Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (“ID”) (Order No. 19) issued by the presiding administrative law judge (“ALJ”) granting complainant's motion to amend the complaint and notice of investigation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Walters, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone

(202)708-5468. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone

(202)205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at *http://www.usitc.gov.* The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket

(EDIS)at *http://edis.usitc.gov.* Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on

(202)205-1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This investigation was instituted on January 9, 2006, based on a complaint filed by Biax Corporation (“Biax”) of Boulder, Colorado. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain digital processors or digital processing systems, components thereof, or products containing the same by reason of infringement of various claims of United States Patent Nos. 5,021,945 (“the ‘945 patent”), 5,517,628 (“the ‘628 patent”), and 6,253,313 (“the ‘313 patent”). The complaint originally named four respondents: Philips Semiconductors B.V. of the Netherlands; Philips Consumer Electronics Services B.V. of the Netherlands; Philips Consumer Electronics North America Corp. of Atlanta, Georgia; and 2Wire, Inc. of San Jose, California. Biax previously amended the complaint and notice of investigation to remove Philips Consumer Electronics North America Corp. and Philips Consumer Electronics Services B.V. and to add Philips Electronics North America Corp., Philips Semiconductors, Inc., and Philips Consumer Electronics B.V. as respondents. On January 23, 2007, Biax moved to amend the complaint and notice of investigation to remove respondent Philips Semiconductors B.V. and to add NXP B.V. of the Netherlands as a respondent. Biax stated that it had recently learned that Philips Semiconductors B.V. was spun off into a new business entity NXP B.V. Biax also moved to withdraw claims 3, 4, 8, and 12 of the ‘945 patent and all of the asserted claims of the ‘628 patent and the ‘313 patent from the investigation to reduce the number of issues. None of the current respondents or the Commission investigative attorney opposed Biax's motion. On February 2, 2007, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 19) granting Biax's motion to amend the complaint and notice of investigation. The ALJ found that, pursuant to Commission Rule 210.14(b)(1) (19 CFR 210.14(b)(1)), there was good cause to remove respondent Philips Semiconductors B.V. and to add NXP B.V. as a respondent and to withdraw claims 3, 4, 8, and 12 of the ‘945 patent and the asserted claims of the ‘628 patent and the ‘313 patent from the investigation. No petitions for review of the ID were filed. Having examined the record of this investigation, the Commission has determined not to review the ALJ's ID. The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 210.42 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42). By order of the Commission. Issued: February 22, 2007. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E7-3386 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020-02-P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337-TA-572] In the Matter of Certain Insulin Delivery Devices Including Cartridges Having Adaptor Tops and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation in Its Entirety Based Upon Withdrawal of the Complaint AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (“ID”) of the presiding administrative law judge (“ALJ”) in the above-captioned investigation terminating the above-captioned investigation as to all respondents based on withdrawal of the complaint. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael K. Haldenstein, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone

(202)205-3041. Copies of the public version of the ALJ's ID and all other nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server ( *http://www.usitc.gov* ). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket

(EDIS)at *http://edis.usitc.gov* . Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on June 9, 2006, based on a complaint filed by Novo Nordisk A/S of Denmark, Novo Nordisk Inc., of New Jersey and Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals Industries, Inc. of North Carolina. 71 FR 33484 (June 9, 2006). The complaint, as supplemented, alleged violations of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain insulin delivery devices, including cartridges having adaptor tops, and components thereof, by reason of infringement of claims 1-3, 5-7, 11, 18, and 19 of U.S. Patent 5,693,027. The complaint further alleged that an industry in the United States exists or is in the process of being established as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainants requested that the Commission issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist order. The Commission named three companies as respondents: Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH of Germany, Sanofi-Aventis of France, and Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of New Jersey. The ALJ set August 23, 2007 as the target date for completion of the investigation. On October 5, 2006, complainants filed a motion to withdraw the complaint and terminate the investigation as to all parties. The three respondents filed a response to the motion on October 13, 2006, arguing that while they did not oppose termination of the investigation, sanctions and termination with prejudice were appropriate. The Commission investigative attorney supported the motion for termination of the investigation and opposed imposition of sanctions and termination of the investigation with prejudice. On January 29, 2007, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 6) granting complainants' motion to terminate the investigation without prejudice based upon withdrawal of the complaint. No petitions for review of the ID were filed. The Commission has determined not to review this ID. This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and Commission rules 210.21 and 210.42, 19 CFR 210.21 and 210.42. By order of the Commission. Issued: February 21, 2007. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E7-3393 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020-02-P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337-TA-594] In the Matter of Certain Lighting Products, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same; Notice of Investigation AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on January 23, 2007, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Cooper Lighting, Inc. of Peachtree City, GA. A supplement to the complaint was filed on February 9, 2007. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain lighting products, components thereof, and products containing the same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,082,878 and 5,662,413. The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a permanent exclusion order and a permanent cease and desist order. ADDRESSES: The complaint and supplement, except for any confidential information contained therein, are available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at *http://www.usitc.gov* . The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket

(EDIS)at *http://edis.usitc.gov.* FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan F. Moore, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone

(202)205-2767. *Authority:* The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2006). *Scope of Investigation:* Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on February 21, 2007, ordered that—

(1)Pursuant to subsection

(b)of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain lighting products, components thereof, and products containing the same by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 23, 26, and 27 of U.S. Patent No. 6,082,878, and claims 1 and 7 of U.S. Patent No. 5,662,413, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;

(2)For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served:

(a)The complainant is—Cooper Lighting, Inc., 1121 Highway 74 South, Peachtree City, GA 30269.

(b)The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: Cordelia Lighting, Inc., 20101 South Santa Fe Avenue, Rancho Dominguez, CA 90221. Jimway, Inc., 20101 South Santa Fe Avenue, Rancho Dominguez, CA 90221.

(c)The Commission investigative attorney, party to this investigation, is Bryan F. Moore, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 401-I, Washington, DC 20436; and

(3)For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Charles E. Bullock is designated as the presiding administrative law judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of a limited exclusion order or cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. Issued: February 21, 2007. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E7-3364 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020-02-P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337-TA-550] In the Matter of Certain Modified Vaccinia Ankara (“MVA”) Viruses and Vaccines and Pharmaceutical Compositions Based Thereon; Notice of Commission Decision to Remand the Final Initial Determination Finding No Violation of Section 337 and To Extend the Target Date for Completion of the Investigation AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to remand the final initial determination (“final ID”) of the presiding administrative law judge (“ALJ”) finding no violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (“section 337”), in the above-captioned investigation and to extend the target date for completion of the investigation to October 19, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James A. Worth, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone

(202)205-3065. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone

(202)205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server ( *http://www.usitc.gov* ). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket

(EDIS)at *http://edis.usitc.gov* . Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on

(202)205-1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This investigation was instituted on September 23, 2005, based on a complaint filed by Bavarian Nordic A/S of Denmark (“Bavarian Nordic”). The complaint alleged violations of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain Modified Vaccinia Ankara (“MVA”) viruses and vaccines and pharmaceutical compositions based thereon by reason of infringement of various claims of United States Patent Nos. 6,761,893 and 6,913,752. The complaint also alleged violations of section 337 in the importation of certain MVA viruses and vaccines and pharmaceutical compositions based thereon or in the sale of such articles by reason of misappropriation of trade secrets, the threat or effect of which is to destroy or substantially injure an industry in the United States. The complaint named a single respondent, Acambis PLC (“Acambis”) of the United Kingdom. Only the patent allegations remain in this investigation. After a hearing and post-hearing briefing, the ALJ issued a final initial determination (“final ID”) on September 6, 2006, finding no violation of section 337. The ALJ held that the patents were infringed but invalid. Bavarian Nordic, Acambis, and the Commission investigative attorney filed petitions for review of the final ID. By notice of November 22, 2006, the Commission determined to review the final ID in its entirety, as well as Order No. 10, and to ask the parties for briefing on the issues on review and on remedy, public interest and bonding. The parties submitted their initial and reply briefs on December 12 and December 22, 2006, respectively. By notice of January 19, 2007, the Commission requested briefing on whether this investigation has become or will shortly become moot, and if so, whether the investigation should be terminated. The parties submitted briefing on January 26, 2007. The Commission has determined to remand the final ID to the ALJ and to extend the target date for completion of the investigation by eight months to October 19, 2007. This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in sections 210.45(c), 210.51(a) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.45(c), 210.51(a)). By order of the Commission. Issued: February 21, 2007. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E7-3390 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020-02-P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Drug Enforcement Administration Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration By Notice dated October 6, 2006, and published in the **Federal Register** on October 18, 2006, (71 FR 61510), Boehringer Ingelheim Chemicals Inc., 2820 N. Normandy Drive, Petersburg, Virginia 23805, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration

(DEA)to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedules I and II: Drug Schedule Tetrahydrocannabinols

(7370)I Amphetamine

(1100)II Methylphenidate

(1724)II Methadone

(9250)II Methadone Intermediate

(9254)II Dextropropoxyphene, bulk (non-dosage forms)

(9273)II Fentanyl(9801) II The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances in bulk for sale to its customers for formulation into finished pharmaceuticals. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of Boehringer Ingelheim Chemicals Inc. to manufacture the listed basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Boehringer Ingelheim Chemicals Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed. Dated: February 16, 2007. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control Drug Enforcement, Administration. [FR Doc. E7-3296 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Drug Enforcement Administration Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration By Notice dated November 21, 2006 and published in the **Federal Register** on December 1, 2006, (71 FR 69591-69592), Johnson Matthey, Inc., Pharmaceutical Materials, 2003 Nolte Drive, West Deptford, New Jersey 08066-1742, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration

(DEA)to be registered as an importer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedule II: Drug Schedule Phenylacetone

(8501)II Raw Opium

(9600)II Concentrate of Poppy Straw

(9670)II The company plans to import the listed controlled substances as raw materials for use in the manufacture of bulk controlled substances for distribution to its customers. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 952(a) and determined that the registration of Johnson Matthey Inc to import the basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest and with United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. DEA has investigated Johnson Matthey Inc to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 952(a) and § 958(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34, the above named company is granted registration as an importer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed. Dated: February 16, 2007. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration. [FR Doc. E7-3299 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Drug Enforcement Administration Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration By Notice dated November 8, 2006 and published in the **Federal Register** on November 17, 2006, (71 FR 66974), Kenco VPI, Division of Kenco Group Inc., 350 Corporate Place, Chattanooga, Tennessee 37419, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration

(DEA)to be registered as an importer of Nabilone (7379), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule II. The company plans to import the listed controlled substance for distribution to its customers. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 952(a) and determined that the registration of Kenco VPI to import the basic class of controlled substance is consistent with the public interest and with United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. DEA has investigated Kenco VPI to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 952(a) and 958(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34, the above named company is granted registration as an importer of the basic class of controlled substance listed. Dated: February 16, 2007. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration. [FR Doc. E7-3298 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Drug Enforcement Administration Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 958(i), the Attorney General shall, prior to issuing a registration under this Section to a bulk manufacturer of a controlled substance in schedule I or II and prior to issuing a regulation under 21 U.S.C. 952(a) authorizing the importation of such a substance, provide manufacturers holding registrations for the bulk manufacture of the substance an opportunity for a hearing. Therefore, in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34(a), this is notice that on January 9, 2007, Sigma Aldrich Manufacturing LLC., Subsidiary of Sigma-Aldrich Company, 3500 Dekalb Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63118, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration

(DEA)to be registered as an importer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedule I and II: Drug Schedule Cathinone

(1235)I Methcathinone

(1237)I Aminorex

(1585)I Gamma Hydroxybutyric Acid

(2010)I Methaqualone

(2565)I Ibogaine

(7260)I Lysergic acid diethylamide

(7315)I Marihuana

(7360)I Tetrahydrocannabinols

(7370)I Mescaline

(7381)I 4-Bromo-2,5-dimethoxyamphetamine

(7391)I 4-Bromo-2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine

(7392)I 4-Methyl-2,5-dimethoxyamphetamine

(7395)I 2,5-Dimethoxyamphetamine

(7396)I 3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine

(7400)I N-Hydroxy-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine

(7402)I 3,4-Methylenedioxy-N-ethylamphetamine

(7404)I 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine

(7405)I 4-Methoxyamphetamine

(7411)I Bufotenine

(7433)I Diethyltryptamine

(7434)I Dimethyltryptamine

(7435)I Psilocybin

(7437)I Psilocyn

(7438)I N-Ethyl-1-phenylcyclohexylamine

(7455)I N-Benzylpiperazine

(7493)I Trifluoromethylphenyl Piperazine

(7494)I Heroin

(9200)I Normorphine

(9313)I Etonitazene

(9624)I Amphetamine

(1100)II Methamphetamine

(1105)II Methylphenidate

(1724)II Amobarbital

(2125)II Pentobarbital

(2270)II Secobarbital

(2315)II Glutethimide

(2550)II Nabilone

(7379)II Phencyclidine

(7471)II Cocaine

(9041)II Codeine

(9050)II Diprenorphine

(9058)II Oxycodone

(9143)II Hydromorphone

(9150)II Diphenoxylate

(9170)II Ecgonine

(9180)II Ethylmorphine

(9190)II Hydrocodone

(9193)II Levorphanol

(9220)II Meperidine

(9230)II Methadone

(9250)II Dextropropoxyphene, bulk (non-dosage forms)

(9273)II Morphine

(9300)II Thebaine

(9333)II Opium powdered

(9639)II Oxymorphone

(9652)II Fentanyl

(9801)II The company plans to import the listed controlled substances for sale to research facilities for drug testing and analysis. Any bulk manufacturer who is presently, or is applying to be, registered with DEA to manufacture such basic classes of controlled substances may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration and may, at the same time, file a written request for a hearing on such application pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.43 and in such form as prescribed by 21 CFR 1316.47. Any such written comments or objections being sent via regular mail should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, Washington, D.C. 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODL; or any being sent via express mail should be sent to DEA Headquarters, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODL, 2401 Jefferson-Davis Highway, Alexandria, Virginia 22301; and must be filed no later than March 29, 2007. This procedure is to be conducted simultaneously with and independent of the procedures described in 21 CFR 1301.34(b), (c), (d),

(e)and (f). As noted in a previous notice published in the **Federal Register** on September 23, 1975, (40 FR 43745-46), all applicants for registration to import a basic classes of any controlled substances listed in schedule I or II are, and will continue to be required to demonstrate to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, that the requirements for such registration pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 958(a), 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and 21 CFR 1301.34(b), (c), (d),

(e)and

(f)are satisfied. Dated: February 16, 2007. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration. [FR Doc. E7-3297 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-60,837] Bright Horizons/MSX/Norfolk Assembly Plant, a/k/a Ford Family Service & Learning Center, Norfolk, VA; Notice of Termination of Investigation Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on January 26, 2007, in response to a worker petition filed on behalf of workers at Bright Horizons/MSX/Norfolk Assembly Plant, Norfolk, Virginia. The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of February, 2007. Richard Church, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7-3277 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers (TA-W) number and alternative trade adjustment assistance

(ATAA)by (TA-W) number issued during the period of January 12 through January 16, 2007. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision have decreased absolutely; and C. Increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. There has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or subdivision; and C. One of the following must be satisfied: 1. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United States; 2. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act; or 3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are or were produced by such firm or subdivision. Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made for secondarily affected workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met.

(1)Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers' firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated;

(2)The workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related to the article that was the basis for such certification; and

(3)Either—

(A)the workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph

(2)accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or

(B)a loss or business by the workers' firm with the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph

(2)contributed importantly to the workers' separation or threat of separation. In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

(ATAA)for older workers, the group eligibility requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met. 1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are 50 years of age or older. 2. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are not easily transferable. 3. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry (i.e., conditions within the industry are adverse). Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met. *TA-W-60,557; Burley Design, LLC, Bicycles, Eugene, OR: December 6, 2005.* The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the Trade Act have been met. *TA-W-60,909; Kree Technologies USA, Plattsburgh, NY: February 5, 2006.* The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met. *None.* The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act have been met. *None.* Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. *TA-W-60,755; Illinois Tool Workers

(ITW)Paslode, Nail Unit, Portage, WI: January 11, 2006.* *TA-W-60,762; Specialty Filaments, Inc., A Subsidiary of Capital Resource Partners, Middlebury, VT: January 11, 2006.* *TA-W-60,773; Klaussner Furniture Industries, Inc., Plant #3—220 Business South, Asheboro, NC: January 16, 2006.* *TA-W-60,828; Stimson Lumber Company, Libby Fingerjoint Plant, Libby, MT: January 24, 2006.* *TA-W-60,672; Affordable Upholstery LLC, Maynardville, TN: December 24, 2005.* *TA-W-60,709; Carauster Custom Packaging Group, Inc., Austell, GA: December 20, 2005.* The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. *TA-W-60,557C; Burley Design, LLC, Sewn Products, Eugene, OR: December 6, 2005.* *TA-W-60,819; Enhanced Manufacturing Solutions, Formerly Known as Viking New Castle, LLC, New Castle, IN: January 15, 2006.* *TA-W-60,820; Spencerville Metal Systems, Formerly Trim Trends Co Ohio, Inc., Spencerville, OH: January 9, 2006.* *TA-W-60,861; Elastic Corporation of America, Inc., Columbiana, AL: August 20, 2006.* *TA-W-60,896; Merck and Company, Flint River Plant, Albany, GA: February 1, 2006.* *TA-W-60,915; Hanes Menswear, Hanes Menswear—Ponce Division, Ponce, PR: January 29, 2006.* *TA-W-60,699; Filtronic Comtek, Inc., Salisbury, MD: January 3, 2006.* *TA-W-60,927; IMI Cornelius, Inc., Mason City, IA: February 7, 2006.* *TA-W-60,932; North Star Yachts, LLC, North Sea Yachts, Express Personnel Service, Anderson, Kalama, WA: February 6, 2006.* The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. *TA-W-60,556; Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc., Action Staffing, Greenville, SC: November 25, 2006.* The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. *None.* Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, it has been determined that the requirements of 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for the reasons specified. The Department has determined that criterion

(1)of Section 246 has not been met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of age or older. *TA-W-60,557; Burley Design, LLC, Bicycles, Eugene, OR: December 6, 2005.* *TA-W-60,909; Kree Technologies USA, Plattsburgh, NY: February 5, 2006.* The Department has determined that criterion

(2)of Section 246 has not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily transferable. *None.* The Department has determined that criterion

(3)of Section 246 has not been met. Competition conditions within the workers' industry are not adverse. *None.* Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified. Because the workers of the firm are not eligible to apply for TAA, the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA. The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.) (employment decline) have not been met. *TA-W-60,557A; Burley Design, LLC, Bicycle Trailers, Eugene, OR.* *TA-W-60,557B; Burley Design, LLC, Jog Strollers, Eugene, OR.* The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met. *TA-W-60,822; Shiloh Industries, Parma, OH.* The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met. *TA-W-60,715; Conair Group, Inc. (The), International Plastics Equipment Group, Inc., Franklin, PA.* *TA-W-60,740; Classic Picture Company, Inc., Dallas, TX.* *TA-W-60,393; R R Donnelley Premedia Technologies, Warsaw Premedia Center, Warsaw, IN.* *TA-W-60,760; Ahlstrom Corp., LLC, Mt. Holly Springs, PA.* The investigation revealed that the predominate cause of worker separations is unrelated to criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.C) (shift in production to a foreign country under a free trade agreement or a beneficiary country under a preferential trade agreement, or there has been or is likely to be an increase in imports). *None.* The workers' firm does not produce an article as required for certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974. *TA-W-60,753; Cerf Brothers Bag Company, Earth City, MO.* *TA-W-60,920; Allied Systems, Ltd., Chesapeake, VA.* *TA-W-60,938; Plastron Industries, Bensenville, IL.* The investigation revealed that criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been met. The workers' firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier to or a downstream producer for a firm whose workers were certified eligible to apply for TAA. *None.* I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of January 12 through January 16, 2007. Copies of these determinations are available for inspection in Room C-5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 during normal business hours or will be mailed to persons who write to the above address. Dated: February 21, 2007. Ralph DiBattista, Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7-3275 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-60,786] Hanes Brands, Inc., a/k/a Hanes Menswear, Ponce, PR; Notice of Termination of Investigation Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on January 18, 2007 in response to a worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Hanes Menswear, a/k/a Hanes Brands, Inc., Ponce, Puerto Rico. The petitioning group of workers is covered by an active certification, (TA-W-60,915), which expires on February 13, 2009. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated. Signed at Washington, DC this 13th day of February, 2007. Richard Church, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7-3276 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Investigations Regarding Certifications of Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (“the Act”) and are identified in the Appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to Section 221(a) of the Act. The purpose of each of the investigations is to determine whether the workers are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title II, Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations will further relate, as appropriate, to the determination of the date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved. The petitioners or any other persons showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigations may request a public hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than March 9, 2007. Interested persons are invited to submit written comments regarding the subject matter of the investigations to the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than March 9, 2007. The petitions filed in this case are available for inspection at the Office of the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room C-5311, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of February 2007. Ralph Dibattista, Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. Appendix—TAA [Petitions instituted between 2/5/07 and 2/9/07] TA-W Subject firm (petitioners) Location Date of institution Date of petition 60896 Merck and Company

(Wkrs)Albany, GA 02/05/07 02/01/07 60897 ADN Corporation

(Wkrs)Chicago, IL 02/05/07 01/02/07 60898 Thyssen Krupp Grankshafts Machining

(Wkrs)Danville, IL 02/05/07 01/08/07 60899 CCL Label St. Louis

(Wkrs)St. Charles, MO 02/05/07 01/30/07 60900 Martinrea Industries

(Wkrs)Clare, MI 02/05/07 02/02/07 60901 Perfect Fit Glove Co., LLC

(Comp)Buffalo, NY 02/05/07 02/01/07 60902 Tenet Healthcare (State) Anaheim, CA 02/05/07 02/02/07 60903 Clarion Technologies, Inc.

(Comp)Ames, IA 02/05/07 01/30/07 60904 Reed Manufacturing Company, Inc.

(Comp)Tupelo, MS 02/05/07 02/02/07 60905 General Motors

(UAW)Janesville, WI 02/05/07 02/02/07 60906 Weyerhauser Company (UBCJA) Eugene, OR 02/05/07 02/02/07 60907 Ski Country Imports, Inc.

(Comp)Denver, CO 02/05/07 02/02/07 60908 Georgia Pacific

(Wkrs)Muskogee, OK 02/05/07 02/02/07 60909 Kree Technologies, USA Inc.

(Wkrs)Plattsburg, NY 02/06/07 02/05/07 60910 HRU, Inc.

(Comp)Lansing, MI 02/06/07 01/31/07 60911 Truth Hardware

(Wkrs)West Hazleton, PA 02/06/07 02/05/07 60912 Quebecor World-Lincoln (State) Lincoln, NE 02/07/07 02/02/07 60913 Reed Sportswear Manufacturing Co.

(Wkrs)Detroit, MI 02/07/07 12/15/06 60914 Martinrea-Reed City Tool and Die Division

(Comp)Reed City, MI 02/07/07 02/06/07 60915 Hanes-Ponce

(Comp)Ponce, PR 02/07/07 01/29/07 60916 AVX Corporation

(Comp)Raleigh, NC 02/07/07 01/26/07 60917 Kasper, Ltd (UNITE) New York, NY 02/07/07 02/05/07 60918 Bosal Industries

(Comp)Columbia, TN 02/08/07 02/05/07 60919 Eaton Corporation

(Comp)Mantua, OH 02/08/07 02/07/07 60920 Allied Systems, Ltd.

(Comp)Chesapeake, VA 02/08/07 02/07/07 60921 Weyerhaeuser Company

(Comp)Springfield, OR 02/08/07 02/01/07 60922 RB and W Manufacturing, LL (Union) Kent, OH 02/08/07 02/05/07 60923 Noutex Corporation

(Comp)Adams, MA 02/08/07 02/07/07 60924 Martco Limited Partnership/ROMEX WTC (State) Alexandria, LA 02/08/07 02/05/07 60925 Westinghouse Electric Company Nuclear Automation (State) New Britain, CT 02/08/07 02/07/07 60926 Verizon Business

(Wkrs)Cedar Rapids, IA 02/08/07 01/27/07 60927 IMI Cornelius Inc.

(Comp)Mason City, IA 02/08/07 02/07/07 60928 Florence Design Group

(Comp)Florence, AL 02/08/07 02/06/07 60929 Compuspar USA, Inc.

(Wkrs)Allentown, PA 02/09/07 02/07/07 60930 Helikon Furniture (State) Taftville, CT 02/09/07 02/08/07 60931 Renfro Charleston, LLC

(Comp)Fort Payne, AL 02/09/07 02/07/07 60932 North Seas Yachts dba North Star Yachts

(Comp)Kalama, WA 02/09/07 02/06/07 60933 Gerson and Gerson Inc.

(Comp)Middlesex, NC 02/09/07 02/08/07 60934 Golden Manufacturing Co.

(Wkrs)Marietta, MS 02/09/07 01/29/07 [FR Doc. E7-3274 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-60,862] Springs Global, Hartwell Weaving and Yarn, Hartwell, GA; Notice of Termination of Investigation Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on January 31, 2007 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Springs Global, Hartwell Weaving and Yarn, Hartwell, Georgia. The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. Signed in Washington, DC, this 13th day of February 2007. Linda G. Poole, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7-3273 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Occupational Safety and Health Administration [Docket No. NRTL1-88] MET Laboratories, Inc.; Expansion of Recognition AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: This notice announces the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's final decision expanding the recognition of MET Laboratories, Inc.,

(MET)as a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory under 29 CFR 1910.7. DATES: The expansion of recognition becomes effective on February 27, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: MaryAnn Garrahan, Director, Office of Technical Programs and Coordination Activities, NRTL Program, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room N-3655, Washington, DC 20210, or phone

(202)693-2110. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of Final Decision The Occupational Safety and Health Administration

(OSHA)hereby gives notice of the expansion of recognition of MET Laboratories, Inc.,

(MET)as a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL). MET's expansion covers the use of additional test standards. OSHA's current scope of recognition for MET may be found in the following informational Web page: *http://www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/met.html.* OSHA recognition of an NRTL signifies that the organization has met the legal requirements in Section 1910.7 of Title 29, Code of Federal Regulations (29 CFR 1910.7). Recognition is an acknowledgment that the organization can perform independent safety testing and certification of the specific products covered within its scope of recognition and is not a delegation or grant of government authority. As a result of recognition, employers may use products properly approved by the NRTL to meet OSHA standards that require testing and certification. The Agency processes applications by an NRTL for initial recognition or for expansion or renewal of this recognition following requirements in Appendix A to 29 CFR 1910.7. This appendix requires that the Agency publish two notices in the **Federal Register** in processing an application. In the first notice, OSHA announces the application and provides its preliminary finding and, in the second notice, the Agency provides its final decision on the application. These notices set forth the NRTL's scope of recognition or modifications of that scope. We maintain an informational Web page for each NRTL that details its scope of recognition. These pages can be accessed from our Web site at *http://www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/index.html.* MET submitted an application, dated August 23, 2005, (see Exhibit 39-1) to expand its recognition to include 10 additional test standards. MET later amended its application through a follow-up request to add 10 more test standards (see Exhibit 39-2). The NRTL Program staff determined that each of these standards is an “appropriate test standard” within the meaning of 29 CFR 1910.7(c). However, one of these standards is already included in MET's scope. Therefore, OSHA is approving 19 test standards for the expansion. In connection with this request, OSHA did not perform an on-site review of MET's NRTL testing facilities. However, NRTL Program assessment staff reviewed information pertinent to the request and recommended that MET's recognition be expanded to include the 19 additional test standards listed below (see Exhibit 39-3). The preliminary notice announcing the expansion application was published in the **Federal Register** on August 17, 2006 (71 FR 47532). Comments were requested by September 1, but no comments were received in response to this notice. The most recent application processed by OSHA specifically related to MET's recognition granted an expansion, and the final notice for this expansion was published on December 5, 2005 (70 FR 72470). You may obtain or review copies of all public documents pertaining to the MET application by contacting the Docket Office, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room N-2625, Washington, DC, 20210. Docket No. NRTL1-88 contains all materials in the record concerning MET's recognition. The current address of the MET facility already recognized by OSHA is: MET Laboratories, Inc., 914 West Patapsco Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21230. Final Decision and Order NRTL Program staff has examined the application, the assessor's recommendation, and other pertinent information. Based upon this examination and the assessor's recommendation, OSHA finds that MET has met the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.7 for expansion of its recognition, subject to the limitation and conditions listed below. Pursuant to the authority in 29 CFR 1910.7, OSHA hereby expands the recognition of MET, subject to the following limitation and conditions. Limitation OSHA limits the expansion of MET's recognition to testing and certification of products for demonstration of conformance to the test standards listed below. OSHA has determined that each of these standards meets the requirements for an appropriate test standard, within the meaning of 29 CFR 1910.7(c). UL 82 Electric Gardening Appliances. UL 234 Low Voltage Lighting Fixtures for Use in Recreational Vehicles. UL 298 Portable Electric Hand Lamps. UL 588 Seasonal and Holiday Decorative Products. UL 867 Electrostatic Air Cleaners. UL 917 Clock-Operated Switches. UL 987 Stationary and Fixed Electric Tools. UL 1081 Swimming Pool Pumps, Filters, and Chlorinators. UL 1090 Electric Snow Movers. UL 1363 Relocatable Power Taps. UL 1447 Electric Lawn Mowers. UL 1448 Electric Hedge Trimmers. UL 1450 Motor-Operated Air Compressors, Vacuum Pumps, and Painting Equipment. UL 1559 Insect-Control Equipment—Electrocution Type. UL 1563 Electric Spas, Equipment Assemblies, and Associated Equipment. UL 1662 Electric Chain Saws. UL 1776 High-Pressure Cleaning Machines. UL 1994 Luminous Egress Path Marking Systems. UL 2089 Vehicle Battery Adapters The designation and title of the above test standards were current at the time of the preparation of the notice of the preliminary finding. OSHA's recognition of MET, or any NRTL, for a particular test standard is limited to equipment or materials (i.e., products) for which OSHA standards require third-party testing and certification before use in the workplace. Consequently, if a test standard also covers any product(s) for which OSHA does not require such testing and certification, an NRTL's scope of recognition does not include that product(s). Many UL test standards also are approved as American National Standards by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). However, for convenience, we use the designation of the standards developing organization for the standard as opposed to the ANSI designation. Under our procedures, any NRTL recognized for an ANSI-approved test standard may use either the latest proprietary version of the test standard or the latest ANSI version of that standard. You may contact ANSI to find out whether or not a test standard is currently ANSI-approved. Conditions MET must also abide by the following conditions of the recognition, in addition to those already required by 29 CFR 1910.7: OSHA must be allowed access to MET's facilities and records for purposes of ascertaining continuing compliance with the terms of its recognition and to investigate as OSHA deems necessary; If MET has reason to doubt the efficacy of any test standard it is using under this program, it must promptly inform the test standard developing organization of this fact and provide that organization with appropriate relevant information upon which its concerns are based; MET must not engage in or permit others to engage in any misrepresentation of the scope or conditions of its recognition. As part of this condition, MET agrees that it will allow no representation that it is either a recognized or an accredited Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory

(NRTL)without clearly indicating the specific equipment or material to which this recognition is tied, or that its recognition is limited to certain products; MET must inform OSHA as soon as possible, in writing, of any change of ownership, facilities, or key personnel, and of any major changes in its operations as an NRTL, including details; MET will meet all the terms of its recognition and will always comply with all OSHA policies pertaining to this recognition; and MET will continue to meet the requirements for recognition in all areas where it has been recognized. Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of February, 2007. Edwin G. Foulke, Jr., Assistant Secretary of Labor. [FR Doc. E7-3294 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-26-P NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission to OMB for Extension of a Currently Approved Information Collection; Comment Request AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA). ACTION: Request for comment. SUMMARY: The NCUA intends to submit the following information collection to the Office of Management and Budget

(OMB)for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). This information collection is published to obtain comments from the public. DATES: Comments will be accepted until March 29, 2007. ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments to NCUA Clearance Officer or OMB Reviewer listed below: *Clearance Officer:* Mr. Neil McNamara, National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314-3428, Fax No. 703-837-2861, E-mail: *OCIOmail@ncua.gov.* *OMB Reviewer:* NCUA Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or a copy of the information collection request, should be directed to Tracy Sumpter at the National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-3428 or at

(703)518-6444. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Proposal for the following collection of information: *OMB Number:* 3133-0155. *Form Numbers:* CLF-8700 CLF-8705 CLF-8706 NCUA-7005 CLF-10. *Type of Review:* Extension of a currently approved collection. *Title:* Central Liquidity Facility group/agent membership and loan activity forms. *Description:* Forms used in conjunction with agent member's request for facility advances, to request agent membership in the Central Liquidity Facility and/or to establish terms of relationship between credit unions, agent members and agent group representatives. *Respondents:* Credit unions. *Estimated No. of Respondents/Recordkeepers:* 151. *Estimated Burden Hours per Response:* 36.55 minutes. *Frequency of Response:* Reporting and other (once). *Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:* 92. *Estimated Total Annual Cost:* none. By the National Credit Union Administration Board on February 20, 2007. Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board. [FR Doc. E7-3375 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7535-01-P NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission to OMB for Reinstatement; Comment Request AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA). ACTION: Request for comment. SUMMARY: The NCUA intends to submit the following information collection to the Office of Management and Budget

(OMB)for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). This information collection is published to obtain comments from the public. DATES: Comments will be accepted until March 29, 2007. ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments to NCUA Clearance Officer listed below: *Clearance Officer:* Mr. Neil McNamara, National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314-3428, Fax No. 703-837-2861, E-mail: *mcnamara@ncua.gov* . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or a copy of the information collection request, should be directed to Tracy Sumpter at the National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-3428, or at

(703)518-6444. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Proposal for the following collection of information: *Title:* Application of a State Chartered Credit Union for Insurance of Accounts. *OMB Number:* 3133-0011. *Form Number:* NCUA 9600. *Type of Review:* Reinstatement, without change, of a previously approved collection. *Description:* Section 201 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1781) requires state-chartered credit unions desiring federal insurance to submit an application. The requirement also applies to federal credit unions converting to state charters and desiring federal insurance. *Respondents:* State chartered credit unions and federal credit unions converting to state charter that desire federal insurance of member accounts. *Estimated No. of Respondents/Recordkeepers:* 15. *Estimated Burden Hours per Response:* 3.6 hours. *Frequency of Response:* Reporting. Upon application for federal insurance. *Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:* 54 hours. *Estimated Total Annual Cost:* N/A. By the National Credit Union Administration Board on February 20, 2007. Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board. [FR Doc. E7-3379 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7535-01-P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Notice of Sunshine Act Meetings AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETINGS: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. DATES: Weeks of February 26; March 5, 12, 19, 26; April 2, 2007. PLACE: Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. STATUS: Public and Closed. MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Week of February 26, 2007 Monday, February 26, 2007 1:05 p.m. Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (Tentative). a. Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Early Site Permit for Clinton ESP) (Tentative). Tuesday, February 27, 2007 1:30 p.m. Discussion of Security Issues (Closed—Ex. 1) (Tentative). Wednesday, February 28, 2007. 9:30 a.m. Periodic Briefing on New Reactor Issues (Public Meeting) (Contact: Donna Williams, 301 415-1322). This meeting will be webcast live at the Web address— *http://www.nrc.gov* . Week of March 5, 2007—Tentative Monday, March, 5, 2007 1 p.m. Meeting with Department of Energy on New Reactor Issues (Public Meeting). This meeting will be webcast live at the Web address— *http://www.nrc.gov.* Wednesday, March 7, 2007 9:30 a.m. Briefing on Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response

(NSIR)Programs, Performance, and Plans (Public Meeting) (Contact: Miriam Cohen, 301 415-0260). This meeting will be webcast live at the Web address— *http://www.nrc.gov.* 1 p.m. Discussion of Security Issues (Closed—Ex. 1 and 3). Thursday, March 8, 2007 10 a.m. Briefing on Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards

(NMSS)Programs, Performance, and Plans (Public Meeting) (Contact: Gene Peters, 301 415-5248). This meeting will be webcast live at the Web address— *http://www.nrc.gov.* 1 p.m. Briefing on Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

(NRR)Programs, Performance, and Plans (Public Meeting) (Contact: Reginald Mitchell, 301 415-1275). This meeting will be webcast live at the Web address— *http://www.nrc.gov.* Week of March 12, 2007—Tentative There are no meetings scheduled for the Week of March 12, 2007. Week of March 19, 2007—Tentative Tuesday, March 20, 2007 1:30 p.m. Briefing on Office of Information Services

(OIS)Programs, Performance, and Plans (Public Meeting) (Contact: Edward Baker, 301 415-8700). This meeting will be webcast live at the Web address— *http://www.nrc.gov.* Week of March 26, 2007—Tentative Thursday, March 29, 2007 9:30 a.m. Discussion of Management Issues (Closed—Ex. 2). 1:30 p.m. Discussion of Security Issues (Closed—Ex. 1, 3, & 9). Week of April 2, 2007—Tentative There are no meetings scheduled for the Week of April 2, 2007. * The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change on short notice. To verify the status of meetings call (recording)—(301) 415-1292. Contact person for more information: Michelle Schroll,

(301)415-1662. Additional Information The Discussion of Management Issues (Closed—Ex. 2) previously scheduled on Tuesday, March 6, 2007, at 1 p.m. has been rescheduled on Thursday, March 29, 2007, at 9:30 a.m. The Briefing on Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management

(FSME)Programs, Performance, and Plans (Public Meeting) (Tentative) previously scheduled on Thursday, March 29, 2007, at 9:30 a.m. has been postponed and will be rescheduled. The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet at: *http://www.nrc.gov/what-we-do/policy-making/schedule.html.* The NRC provides reasonable accommodation to individuals with disabilities where appropriate. If you need a reasonable accommodation to participate in these public meetings, or need this meeting notice or the transcript or other information from the public meetings in another format (e.g., braille, large print), please notify the NRC's Disability Program Coordinator, Deborah Chan, at 301-415-7041, TDD: 301-415-2100, or by e-mail at *DLC@nrc.gov* . Determinations on requests for reasonable accommodation will be made on a case-by-case basis. This notice is distributed by mail to several hundred subscribers; if you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to the distribution, please contact the Office of the Secretary, Washington, DC 20555 (301-415-1969). In addition, distribution of this meeting notice over the Internet system is available. If you are interested in receiving this Commission meeting schedule electronically, please send an electronic message to *dkw@nrc.gov.* Dated: February 22, 2007. R. Michelle Schroll, Office of the Secretary. [FR Doc. 07-896 Filed 2-23-07; 12:03 pm]

Connectionstraces to 18

Traces to 18 documents

U.S. Code