Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2007-02-26 · PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE · Notices

Notices. Proposed collection; comment request

1,956 words·~9 min read·/register/2007/02/26/07-854

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 3510-KD-P PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) will submit to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB)for clearance the following proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). *Agency:* United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). *Title:* Initial Patent Applications. *Form Number(s):* PTO/SB/01-01A, PTO/SB/02A-02B, PTO/SB/02LR, PTO/SB/03-03A, PTO/SB/04-07, PTO/SB/13PCT, PTO/SB/14, PTO/SB/16-19, PTO/SB/29-29A, PTO/SB/101-110, EFS-Web Original New Utility, Design, and Provisional Application Forms. *Agency Approval Number:* 0651-0032. *Type of Request:* Revision of a currently approved collection. *Burden:* 10,677,624 hours annually. *Number of Respondents:* 543,591 responses per year. *Avg. Hours Per Response:* The USPTO estimates that it takes between 24 minutes to 30 hours to gather the information, prepare, and submit the various paper and electronic applications in this collection, depending on the situation and the amount of information that needs to be submitted. Since EFS-Web is still relatively new, the USPTO does not yet have a good indication of how much time is saved by filing applications or documents electronically via EFS-Web. Accordingly, the USPTO has estimated the same time to complete the electronically-filed applications as it does to complete those submitted in paper form. As experience with EFS-Web grows, the USPTO will reevaluate the time required for electronically-filed versus paper-filed applications and documents. The USPTO estimates that it takes between 30 minutes to 1 hour to gather the information, prepare, and submit the petitions in this collection. *Needs and Uses:* This collection of information is required by 35 U.S.C. 131 and 37 CFR 1.16 through 1.84. An applicant must provide sufficient information to allow the USPTO to properly examine the application or petition to determine whether it meets the requirements outlined in the patent statutes and regulations. The various fee and application transmittal forms, the declarations, the cover sheets, and the petitions permit applicants to supply all of the information necessary to process the application and enables the USPTO to ensure that all of the information has been provided in order to process the application. *Affected Public:* Individuals or households; business or other for-profit; not-for-profit institutions, farms, the Federal Government, and State, Local, or Tribal Governments. *Frequency:* On occasion. *Respondent's Obligation:* Required to obtain or retain benefits. *OMB Desk Officer:* David Rostker,
(202)395-3897. Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained by any of the following methods: • *E-mail: Susan.Fawcett@uspto.gov* . Include “0651-0032 copy request” in the subject line of the message. • *Fax:* 571-273-0112, marked to the attention of Susan Brown. • *Mail:* Susan K. Brown, Records Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer, Architecture, Engineering and Technical Services, Data Architecture and Services Division, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent on or before March 28, 2007 to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503. Dated: February 20, 2007. Susan K. Brown, Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief Information Officer, Architecture, Engineering and Technical Services, Data Architecture and Services Division. [FR Doc. E7-3182 Filed 2-23-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-16-P PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE Practitioner Records Maintenance, Disclosure, and Discipline Before the Patent and Trademark Office ACTION: Proposed collection; comment request. SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the revision of a continuing information collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before April 27, 2007. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods: • *E-mail:* *Susan.Brown@uspto.gov.* Include “0651-0017 comment” in the subject line of the message. • *Fax:* 571-273-0112, marked to the attention of Susan Brown. • *Mail:* Susan K. Brown, Records Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer, Architecture, Engineering and Technical Services, Data Architecture and Services Division, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. • *Federal e-Rulemaking Portal:* *http://www.regulations.gov.* FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information should be directed to the attention of Christine Nucker, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Mail Stop OED, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450; by telephone at 571-272-6071; or by e-mail at *oed@uspto.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Abstract The Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has the authority to establish regulations governing the conduct and discipline of agents, attorneys, or other persons representing applicants and other parties before the USPTO (35 U.S.C. 2, 32 and 33). The USPTO Code of Professional Responsibility (37 CFR 10.20 to 10.112) describes how attorneys or practitioners should conduct themselves professionally and outlines their responsibilities for recordkeeping and reporting violations or complaints of misconduct to the USPTO, while the Investigations and Disciplinary Proceedings rules (37 CFR 10.130 to 10.170) dictate how the USPTO can discipline attorneys and practitioners. The USPTO Code of Professional Responsibility requires an attorney or agent to maintain complete records of all funds, securities, and other properties of clients coming into his or her possession, and to render appropriate accounts to the client regarding the funds, securities, and other properties. These recordkeeping requirements are necessary to maintain the integrity of client property. Each State Bar requires its attorneys to perform similar record keeping. The Code also requires an attorney or agent to report knowledge of certain violations of the Code to the USPTO. If the complaint is found to have merit, the USPTO will investigate and possibly prosecute violations of the Code. The Director of the Office of Enrollment and Discipline
(OED)may, after notice and opportunity for a hearing, suspend, exclude, or disqualify any practitioner from further practice before the USPTO based on noncompliance with the regulations. Practitioners who have been excluded or suspended from practice before the USPTO must keep and maintain records of their steps to comply with the suspension or exclusion order. These records serve as the practitioner's proof of compliance with the order. Some existing information requirements that were added into the last renewal of this collection are now being deleted in compliance with the Terms of Clearance issued by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB)with the previous Notice of Action for this collection on July 2, 2004. The Terms of Clearance stated that “the agency is reminded of the statutory exemptions from the PRA in 44 U.S.C. 3518(c)(2)(B)(ii) for the conduct of administrative action or investigation involving an agency against specific individuals or entities.” Therefore, the Responses to Requests/Requirements for Information, Requests for Extensions of Time to Respond, Responses to Settlement Offers, and Responses to Show Cause are being deleted from this collection. II. Method of Collection By mail, facsimile, or hand delivery to the USPTO when an individual is required to participate in the information collection. III. Data *OMB Number:* 0651-0017. *Form Number(s):* There are no forms associated with this collection. *Type of Review:* Revision of a currently approved collection. *Affected Public:* Business or other for profit; not-for-profit institutions. *Estimated Number of Respondents:* 485 responses. *Estimated Time Per Response:* The USPTO estimates that it will take the public approximately 2 to 60 hours, depending upon the complexity of the situation, to gather the necessary information, maintain the required records, prepare the complaint, and submit the various documents in this information collection to the USPTO. *Estimated Total Annual Respondent Burden Hours:* 9,180 hours. *Estimated Total Annual Respondent Cost Burden:* $328,200. At $30 per hour for a para-professional/clerical worker, the USPTO estimates $266,400 per year for salary costs associated with respondents for the record keeping requirements in this collection. For complaint/violation reporting, the USPTO predicts that half of the complaints will be filed by practitioners and that the remaining complaints will be split evenly between non-legal professionals and semi-professionals or skilled trades persons. The USPTO estimates that it will cost practitioners $304 per hour, non-legal professionals $156 per hour, and semi-professionals or skilled trades persons $60 per hour to submit a complaint, for a weighted average hourly rate of $206 per hour. Considering these factors, the USPTO estimates $61,800 per year for salary costs associated with filing a complaint, for a total annual respondent cost burden of $328,200 per year. Item Estimated time for response (hours) Estimated annual responses Estimated annual burden hours Record Keeping Maintenance (including financial books and records such as trust accounts, fiduciary accounts, operating accounts, and advertisements) 26 330 8,580 Record Keeping Maintenance Under Suspension or Exclusion from the USPTO 60 5 300 Complaint/Violation Reporting 2 150 300 Total 485 9,180 *Estimated Total Annual (Non-hour) Respondent Cost Burden:* $95. There are no capital start-up costs, maintenance costs or filing fees associated with this information collection. There are, however, postage costs. The public may submit the complaints in this collection to the USPTO by mail through the United States Postal Service. If these documents are sent by first-class mail, a certificate of mailing for each piece of correspondence, stating the date of deposit or transmission to the USPTO, may also be included. The USPTO expects that the complaints will be mailed to the USPTO with first-class postage, at an average cost of 63 cents. The USPTO estimates that up to 150 responses may be submitted by first-class mail, for a postage cost of $95 per year. Therefore, this information collection has a total of $95 in annual (non-hour) respondent cost burden. IV. Request for Comments Comments are invited on:
(a)Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility;
(b)the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden (including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information;
(c)ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(d)ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized or included in the request for OMB approval of this information collection; they will also become a matter of public record. Dated: February 8, 2007. Susan K. Brown, Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief Information Officer, Architecture, Engineering and Technical Services, Data Architecture and Services Division. [FR Doc. E7-3209 Filed 2-23-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-16-P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Office of the Secretary Defense Advisory Committee on Military Personnel Testing AGENCY: Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, DoD. ACTION: Notice of meeting. SUMMARY: Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given that a meeting of the Defense Advisory Committee on Military Personnel Testing is scheduled to be held. The purpose of the meeting is to review planned changes and progress in developing computerized and paper-and-pencil enlistment tests. DATES: March 29, 2007, from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., and March 30, from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Humphrey's Half Moon Inn, 2303 Shelter Island Drive, San Diego, California 92106. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Jane M. Arabian, Assistant Director, Accession Policy, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness), Room 2B721, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000, telephone
(703)697-9271. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Persons desiring to make oral presentations or submit written statements for consideration at the Committee meeting must contact Dr. Jane M. Arabian at the address or telephone number above no later than March 20, 2007. Dated: February 16, 2007. C.R. Choate, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. [FR Doc. 07-854 Filed 2-23-07; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 5
4 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 104-13
  • 37 CFR 10.20
  • 37 CFR 10.130
  • Pub. L. 92-463
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Proposed collection; comment request
Pub. L.Pub. L. 104-13
Cite37 CFR 10.20
Cite37 CFR 10.130
Pub. L.Pub. L. 92-463
Cites 9Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.