Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2007-02-14 · Bureau of Reclamation, Interior · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Notice of availability

7,314 words·~33 min read·/register/2007/02/14/07-700·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior
Action: Notice of availability
Citation: FR Doc. 07-700

Summary

The following Water Management Plans are available for review: • Tea Pot Dome Water District. • East Bay Municipal Utility District. To meet the requirements of the Central Valley Project Improvement Act of 1992 (CVPIA) and the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982, the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) developed and published the Criteria for Evaluating Water Management Plans (Criteria). For the purpose of this announcement, Water Management Plans (Plans) are considered the same as Water Conservation Plans. The above entities have developed a Plan, which Reclamation has evaluated and preliminarily determined to meet the requirements of these Criteria. Reclamation is publishing this notice in order to allow the public to review the plans and comment on the preliminary determinations. Public comment on Reclamation's preliminary (i.e., draft) determination is invited at this time.

Dates

All public comments must be received by March 16, 2007.

Supplementary Information

We are inviting the public to comment on our preliminary ( i.e. , draft) determination of Plan adequacy. Section 3405(e) of the CVPIA (Title 34 Pub. L. 102-575), requires the Secretary of the Interior to establish and administer an office on Central Valley Project water conservation best management practices that shall “* * * develop criteria for evaluating the adequacy of all water conservation plans developed by project contractors, including those plans required by section 210 of the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982.” Also, according to Section 3405(e)(1), these criteria must be developed “* * * with the purpose of promoting the highest level of water use efficiency reasonably achievable by project contractors using best available cost-effective technology and best management practices.” These criteria state that all parties (Contractors) that contract with Reclamation for water supplies (municipal and industrial contracts over 2,000 acre-feet and agricultural contracts over 2,000 irrigable acres) must prepare Plans that contain the following information: 1. Description of the District. 2. Inventory of Water Resources. 3. Best Management Practices (BMPs) for Agricultural Contractors. 4. BMPs for Urban Contractors. 5. Plan Implementation. 6. Exemption Process. 7. Regional Criteria. 8. Five-Year Revisions. Reclamation will evaluate Plans based on these criteria. A copy of these Plans will be available for review at Reclamation's Mid-Pacific (MP) Regional Office located in Sacramento, California, and the local area office. Our practice is to make comments, including names and home addresses of respondents, available for public review. Individual respondents may request that Reclamation withhold their home address from public disclosure, and we will honor such request to the extent allowable by law. There also may be circumstances in which Reclamation would elect to withhold a respondent's identity from public disclosure, as allowable by law. If you wish us to withhold your name and/or address, you must state this prominently at the beginning of your comments. We will make all submissions from organizations, businesses, and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or businesses available for public disclosure in their entirety. If you wish to review a copy of these Plans, please contact Ms. Laurie Sharp to find the office nearest you. Dated: February 8, 2007. Tracy Slavin, Program Management Branch Chief, Mid-Pacific Region, Bureau of Reclamation. [FR Doc. E7-2502 Filed 2-13-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310-MN-P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Reclamation Central Valley Project Improvement Act, Criteria for Developing Refuge Water Management Plans AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The “Criteria for Developing Refuge Water Management Plans” (Refuge Criteria), as applied in the following areas, are now available for public comment. • Gray Lodge Wildlife Area. The Refuge Criteria provides a common methodology, or standard, for efficient use of water by Federal Wildlife Refuges, State Wildlife Management Areas and Resource Conservation Districts that receive water under provisions of the Central Valley Project Improvement Act (CVPIA). They document the process and format by which Refuge Water Management Plans (Plans) should be prepared and submitted to Reclamation as part of the Refuge/District Water Supply Contracts and Memorandum of Agreements. The Refuge Criteria refers to Refuges, Wildlife Areas and Resource Conservation Districts as Refuges. Those Refuges that entered into water supply contracts with Reclamation, as a result of the CVPIA and subsequent Department of the Interior administrative review processes, are required to prepare Plans using the Refuge Criteria. DATES: All public comments must be received by March 16, 2007. ADDRESSES: Please mail comments to Ms. Laurie Sharp, Bureau of Reclamation, 2800 Cottage Way, MP-410, Sacramento, California, 95825, 916-978-5232, or e-mail at . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To be placed on a mailing list for any subsequent information or to obtain a copy of any water management plans, please contact Ms. Sharp at the e-mail address or telephone number above. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In response to the Central Valley Project Improvement Act of 1992 and a 1995 Department of the Interior administrative review process, the Interagency Coordinated Program for Wetland and Water Use Planning (ICP) was formed. The ICP was comprised of representatives from the Bureau of Reclamation, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the California Department of Fish and Game, and the Grassland Water District/Grassland Resource Conservation District. The ICP developed the 1998 Task Force Report, which outlines past, present, and future wetland planning and management issues and a methodology for Refuge Criteria. To continue the work of the now disbanded ICP, an Interagency Refuge Water Management Team (IRWMT) was formed to continue working on wetland issues such as water delivery, including additional work on wetland Refuge Criteria. The IRWMT is also comprised of representatives from the Bureau of Reclamation, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the California Department of Fish and Game, and the Grassland Water District/Grassland Resource Conservation District. The IRWMT used the 1998 Task Force Report and Reclamation's 1999 Conservation and Efficiency Criteria as the foundation for developing the water management planning requirements or criteria included in these Refuge Criteria. The Refuge Criteria also incorporated comments, ideas, and suggestions from Refuge/District managers, biologists, water conservation specialists, engineers, the CALFED Bay-Delta Program, and other Central Valley stakeholders. Our practice is to make comments, including names and home addresses of respondents, available for public review. Individual respondents may request that we withhold their home address from public disclosure, which we will honor to the extent allowable by law. There also may be circumstances in which we would withhold a respondent's identity from public disclosure, as allowable by law. If you wish us to withhold your name and/or address, you must state this prominently at the beginning of your comment. We will make all submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or businesses, available for public disclosure in their entirety. Public comments for the Refuge Criteria are now being accepted. Dated: February 8, 2007. Tracy Slavin, Program Management Branch Chief, Mid-Pacific Region, Bureau of Reclamation. [FR Doc. E7-2518 Filed 2-13-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310-MN-P JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES Revision of Certain Dollar Amounts in the Bankruptcy Code Prescribed Under Section 104(b) of the Code AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: Certain dollar amounts in title 11 and title 28, United States Code, are increased. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Francis F. Szczebak, Chief, Bankruptcy Judges Division, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1900. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 104(b) of title 11, United States Code, provides the mechanism for an automatic 3-year adjustment of dollar amounts in certain sections of titles 11 and 28. Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1994, Public Law No. 103-394, § 108(e), (1994) as amended by Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005, Public Law No. 109-8, § 102(j), (2005). The provision states: (b)(1) On April 1, 1998, and at each 3-year interval ending April 1 thereafter, each dollar amount in effect under [the designated sections of the Code] and section 1409(b) of title 28 immediately before such April 1 shall be adjusted— (A) To reflect the change in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, published by the Department of Labor, for the most recent 3-year period ending immediately before January 1 preceding such April 1, and (B) To round to the nearest $25 the dollar amount that represents such change. (2) Not later than March 1, 1998, and at each 3-year interval ending on March 1, thereafter, the Judicial Conference of the United States shall publish in the Federal Register the dollar amounts that will become effective on such April 1 under sections 101(3), 101(18), 101(19A), 101(51D), 109(e), 303(b), 507(a), 522(d), 522(f)(3) and 522(f)(4), 522(n), 522(p), 522(q), 523(a)(2)(C), 541(b), 547(c)(9), 707(b), 1322(d), 1325(b), and 1326(b)(3) [of the Bankruptcy Code] and section 1409(b) of title 28. (3) Adjustments made in accordance with paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect to cases commenced before the date of such adjustments. Revision of Certain Dollar Amounts in Bankruptcy Code Notice is hereby given that the dollar amounts are increased in the sections in title 11 and title 28, United States Code, as set out in the following chart. These increases do not apply to cases commenced before the effective date of the adjustments, i.e., April 1, 2007. Official Bankruptcy Forms 6E and 10 also will be amended to reflect these adjusted dollar amounts. Dated: February 7, 2007. Francis F. Szczebak, Chief, Bankruptcy Judges Division. Dollar amount to be adjusted New (adjusted) dollar amount 28 U.S.C.: 1409(b)—a trustee may commence a proceeding arising in or related to a case to recover: (1)—money judgment of or property worth less than $1,000 $1,100 (2)—a consumer debt less than $15,000 $16,425 (3)—a non consumer debt against a non insider less than $10,000 $10,950 11 U.S.C.: Section 101(3)—definition of assisted person $150,000 $164,250 Section 101(18)—definition of family farmer $3,237,000 (each time it appears) $3,544,525 (each time it appears) 101(19A)—definition of family fisherman $1,500,000 (each time it appears) $1,642,500 (each time it appears) 101(51D)—definition of small business debtor $2,000,000 (each time it appears) $2,190,000 (each time it appears) Section 109(e)—allowable debt limits for individual filing bankruptcy under chapter 13 $307,675 (each time it appears) $336,900 (each time it appears) $922,975 (each time it appears) $1,010,650 (each time it appears) Section 303(b)—minimum aggregate claims needed for the commencement of involuntary chapter 7 or chapter 11 bankruptcy: (1)—in paragraph (1) $12,300 $13,475 (2)—in paragraph (2) $12,300 $13,475 Section 507(a)—priority expenses and claims (1)—in paragraph (4) $10,000 $10,950 (2)—in paragraph (5) $10,000 $10,950 (3)—in paragraph (6) $4,925 $5,400 (4)—in paragraph (7) $2,225 $2,425 Section 522(d)—value of property exemptions allowed to the debtor (1)—in paragraph (1) $18,450 $20,200 (2)—in paragraph (2) $2,950 $3,225 (3)—in paragraph (3) $475 $9,850 $525 $10,775 (4)—in paragraph (4) $1,225 $1,350 (5)—in paragraph (5) $975 $9,250 $1,075 $10,125 (6)—in paragraph (6) $1,850 $2,025 (7)—in paragraph (8) $9,850 $10,775 (8)—in paragraph (11)(D) $18,450 $20,200 522(f)(3)—exception to lien avoidance under certain state laws $5,000 $5,475 522(f)(4)—items excluded from definition of household goods for lien avoidance purposes $500 (each time it appears) $550 (each time it appears) 522(n)—maximum aggregate value of assets in individual retirement accounts exempted $1,000,000 $1,095,000 522(p)—qualified homestead exemption $125,000 $136,875 522(q)—state homestead exemption $125,000 $136,875 523(a)(2)(C)—exceptions to discharge: in subclause (i)(I)—consumer debts, incurred ≤ 90 days before filing owed to a single creditor in the aggregate $500 $550 in subclause (i)(II)—cash advances incurred ≤ 70 days before filing in the aggregate $750 $825 541(b)—property of the estate exclusions: (1)—in paragraph (5)(C)—education IRA funds in the aggregate $5,000 $5,475 (2)—in paragraph (6)(C)—pre-purchased tuition credits in the aggregate $5,000 $5,475 547(c)(9)—preferences, trustee may not avoid a transfer if, in a case filed by a debtor whose debts are not primarily consumer debts, the aggregate value of property is less than $5,000 $5,475 707(b)—dismissal of a case or conversion to a case under chapter 11 or 13 (means test): (1)—in paragraph (2)(A)(i)(I) $6,000 $6,575 (2)—in paragraph (2)(A)(i)(II) $10,000 $10,950 (3)—in paragraph (2)(A)(ii)(IV) $1,500 $1,650 (4)—in paragraph (5)(B) $1,000 $1,100 (5)—in paragraph 6(C) $525 $575 (6)—in paragraph 7(A) $525 $575 1322(d)—contents of chapter 13 plan, monthly income $525 (each time it appears) $575 (each time it appears) 1325(b)—chapter 13 confirmation of plan, disposable income $525 (each time it appears) $575 (each time it appears) 1326(b)(3)—payments to former chapter 7 trustee $25 $25 [FR Doc. E7-2501 Filed 2-13-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 2210-55-P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Drug Enforcement Administration [OMB Number 1117-0042] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comments Requested ACTION: 30-Day Notice of Information Collection Under Review National Clandestine Laboratory Seizure Report. The Department of Justice (DOJ), Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has submitted the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. This proposed information collection was previously published in the Federal Register Volume 71, Number 237, page 71555 on December 11, 2006, allowing for a 60 day comment period. The purpose of this notice is to allow for an additional 30 days for public comment until March 16, 2007. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. Written comments and/or suggestions regarding the items contained in this notice, especially the estimated public burden and associated response time, should be directed to the Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention Department of Justice Desk Officer, Washington, DC 20503. Additionally, comments may be submitted to OMB via facsimile to (202) 395-5806. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: —Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; —Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; —Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and —Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g. , permitting electronic submission of responses. Overview of This Information Collection (1) Type of Information Collection: Extension of a currently approved collection. (2) Title of the Form/Collection: National Clandestine Laboratory Seizure Report. (3) Agency form number, if any and the applicable component of the Department sponsoring the collection: Form number: EPIC Form 143. Component: El Paso Intelligence Center, Drug Enforcement Administration, U.S. Department of Justice. (4) Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract: Primary: State, Local or Tribal Government. Other: None. Abstract: Records in this system are used to provide clandestine laboratory seizure information to the El Paso Intelligence Center, Drug Enforcement Administration, and other Law enforcement agencies, in the discharge of their law enforcement duties and responsibilities. (5) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time estimated for an average respondent to respond: There are ninety-two (92) total respondents for this information collection. Seven thousand three hundred twenty-eight (7328) responded using paper at 1 hour a response and one thousand one hundred sixty-three (1163) responded electronically at 1 hour a response, for eight thousand four hundred ninety-one (8491) annual responses. (6) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the collection: It is estimated that there are 8491 annual burden hours associated with this collection. If additional information is required contact: Ms. Lynn Bryant, Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Patrick Henry Building, Suite 1600, 601 D Street NW., Washington, DC 20530. Dated: February 7, 2007. Lynn Bryant, Department Clearance Officer, Department of Justice. [FR Doc. E7-2551 Filed 2-13-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Office of Justice Programs [OJP (NIJ) Docket No. 1466] Announcement of Body Armor Standards and Testing Technical Workshop AGENCY: National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Justice. ACTION: Announcement of public technical workshop. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice (NIJ) will hold a technical workshop in order to discuss, and obtain comments and technical input on, draft changes being considered for the NIJ standard for ballistic-resistance of personal body armor and for NIJ's voluntary body armor compliance testing program, including its activities generally related to conformity assessment. The workshop is jointly sponsored by NIJ and the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Office of Law Enforcement Standards. The technical workshop will be open to body armor industry technical representatives, official representatives from public safety agencies and organizations, the research and development and scientific communities, and other stakeholders. We plan to make certain documents related to the draft changes under consideration available for review approximately two weeks prior to the workshop. Information about the availability of these documents can be found on the Web site referenced below. Those individuals wishing to attend this workshop and/or provide comment or input as to the draft changes under consideration are directed to the following Web site: . To attend the workshop, individuals must register online by February 16, 2007 (non-U.S. citizens) or by February 21, 2007 (U.S. Citizens). Due to NIST security regulations, there will be no on-site registration allowed on the day of the workshop. No registration fee is required for this event. Directions to the facility and additional information can be found on the Web site. DATES: The workshop will be held on Tuesday, February 27, 2007, from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Wong, by telephone at 202-305-2703 [Note: this is not a toll-free telephone number], or by e-mail at . Dated: February 9, 2007. David W. Hagy, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Office of Justice Programs and Acting Principal Deputy Director, National Institute of Justice. [FR Doc. E7-2522 Filed 2-13-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-18-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-60, 910] HRU, Inc.; Technical Resources, Lansing, Michigan; Notice of Termination of Investigation Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 6, 2007 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers of HRU, Inc., Technical Resources, Lansing, Michigan. The petition regarding the investigation has been deemed invalid. The petition was signed by one dislocated worker. A petition filed by workers requires three signatures. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of February 2007. Richard Church, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7-2472 Filed 2-13-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-60,878] Kimberly-Clark Global Sales, Inc.; Neenah, Wisconsin; Notice of Termination of Investigation Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 1, 2007, in response to a worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Kimberly-Clark Global Sales, Inc., Neenah, Wisconsin. The petitioning group of workers is covered by a duplicate petition (TA-W-60,835) filed on May 24, 2006 that is the subject of an ongoing investigation for which a determination has not yet been issued. Further investigation in this case would duplicate efforts and serve no purpose; therefore the investigation under this petition has been terminated. Signed in Washington, DC, this 6th day of February, 2007. Richard Church, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7-2475 Filed 2-13-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Investigations Regarding Certifications of Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (“the Act”) and are identified in the Appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to Section 221(a) of the Act. The purpose of each of the investigations is to determine whether the workers are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title II, Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations will further relate, as appropriate, to the determination of the date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved. The petitioners or any other persons showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigations may request a public hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than February 26, 2007. Interested persons are invited to submit written comments regarding the subject matter of the investigations to the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than February 26, 2007. The petitions filed in this case are available for inspection at the Office of the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room C-5311, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of February 2007. Linda G. Poole, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. Appendix [TAA petitions instituted between 1/29/07 and 2/2/07] TA-W Subject firm (petitioners) Location Date of institution Date of petition 60844 Lear Corporation—ISD Division (Comp) Strasburg, VA 01/29/07 01/26/07 60845 Maida Development Company (Comp) Hampton, VA 01/29/07 01/26/07 60846 M and B Metal Products Company, Inc. (Comp) Leeds, AL 01/29/07 01/26/07 60847 Mid West Wire Products, Inc. (Comp) Ferndale, MI 01/29/07 01/22/07 60848 WestPoint Home, Inc. (Comp) West Point, GA 01/29/07 01/27/07 60849 C and D Technologies (CPAs), LLC (Wkrs) Milwaukie, OR 01/29/07 01/05/07 60850 Alan White Company, Inc. (State) Stamps, AR 01/30/07 01/29/07 60851 Mastercraft Fabrics LLC (Comp) Cramerton, NC 01/30/07 01/29/07 60852 Rolls-Royce Energy Systems, Inc. (IAMAW) Mount Vernon, OH 01/30/07 01/29/07 60853 Artistree (Comp) Kernersville, NC 01/30/07 01/29/07 60854 Unifi, Inc. (Comp) Yadkinville, NC 01/30/07 01/29/07 60855 Ixtlan Technology (Comp) Adrian, MI 01/30/07 01/15/07 60856 Amery Technical Products, Inc. (Comp) Amery, WI 01/30/07 01/25/07 60857 Asec Manufacturing (UAW) Catoosa, OK 01/30/07 01/22/07 60858 Delphi Corporation (Comp) Anderson, IN 01/30/07 01/23/07 60859 Eaton Corporation (Comp) Phelps, NY 01/31/07 01/30/07 60860 Stabilus, Inc. (Comp) Gastonia, NC 01/31/07 01/30/07 60861 Elastic Corporation of America, Inc. (Comp) Columbiana, AL 01/31/07 01/26/07 60862 Springs Global, Hartwell Weaving and Yarn (Comp) Hartwell, GA 01/31/07 01/30/07 60863 Intier Automotive (AFLCIO) Lewisburg, TN 01/31/07 01/29/07 60864 Elcom, Inc. (Comp) El Paso, TX 01/31/07 01/29/07 60865 Garrity Industries, Inc. (State) Madison, CT 01/31/07 01/29/07 60866 Wolverine World Wide (Wkrs) Rockford, MI 01/31/07 01/29/07 60867 Polymer Group, Inc.—Chicopee (Comp) Gainesville, GA 01/31/07 01/30/07 60868 Pine Hosiery Mills, Inc. (Comp) Star, NC 01/31/07 01/30/07 60869 International Legwear Group (Comp) Hickory, NC 01/31/07 01/30/07 60870 Lear Corporation (Comp) Sidney, OH 01/31/07 01/25/07 60871 Forefront Group Inc. (Wkrs) Springfield, TN 01/31/07 01/16/07 60872 Silberline Manufacturing Co., Inc. (Comp) Tamaqua, PA 01/31/07 01/22/07 60873 CML Innovative Technologies, Inc. (Wkrs) Hackensack, NJ 01/31/07 01/19/07 60874 Superior Furniture Company (Wkrs) Lowell, MI 01/31/07 01/26/07 60875 Vescom Corporation (Comp) Hampden, ME 01/31/07 01/29/07 60876 Armstrong Wood Products Incorporated (AFLCIO) Oneida, TN 02/01/07 01/31/07 60877 SYZYGY, Inc (Comp) Waco, TX 02/01/07 01/31/07 60878 Kimberly-Clark Global Sales, Inc. (Comp) Neenah, WI 02/01/07 01/24/07 60879 VIA Information Tools, Inc. (State) Troy, MI 02/01/07 01/24/07 60880 Vantage Industries, LLC (Wkrs) Hamilton, IN 02/01/07 01/31/07 60881 Schnadig Corporation (Comp) Des Plaines, IL 02/01/07 01/31/07 60882 CAMACO (State) Marianna, AR 02/01/07 01/31/07 60883 Gleason (Wkrs) Rochester, NY 02/01/07 01/23/07 60884 C.A. Lawton Company (The) (Comp) De Pere, WI 02/01/07 01/31/07 60885 Johnson Controls, Inc. (Comp) Hudson, WI 02/02/07 02/01/07 60886 Liebert Corporation (Wkrs) Irvine, CA 02/02/07 01/25/07 60887 Clayton Marcus Company—Plant #1—Bethlehem (Comp) Hickory, NC 02/02/07 02/01/07 60888 Triplett Corporation (Wkrs) Bluffton, OH 02/02/07 02/01/07 60889 United Technologies Corp.—Forney (Comp) Carrollton, TX 02/02/07 01/31/07 60890 Maloney Tool and Mold, Inc. (Comp) Meadville, PA 02/02/07 01/29/07 60891 Cheetah Chassis Corporation (Comp) Berwick, PA 02/02/07 01/29/07 60892 Fenton Art Glass Company (USW) Williamstown, WV 02/02/07 01/31/07 60893 Wayne Wire Air Bag Components, Inc. (Comp) Kalkaska, MI 02/02/07 02/01/07 60894 Carpenter Company (State) Leominster, MA 02/02/07 01/31/07 60895 General Binding Corporation (Wkrs) Pleasant Prairie, WI 02/02/07 01/30/07 [FR Doc. E7-2473 Filed 2-13-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers (TA-W) number and alternative trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by (TA-W) number issued during the period of January 22 through February 2, 2007. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. the sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision have decreased absolutely; and C. increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. there has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or subdivision; and C. One of the following must be satisfied: 1. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United States; 2. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act; or 3. there has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are or were produced by such firm or subdivision. Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made for secondarily affected workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met. (1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers' firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related to the article that was the basis for such certification; and (3) Either— (A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or (B) A loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or threat of separation. In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met. 1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are 50 years of age or older. 2. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are not easily transferable. 3. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry (i.e., conditions within the industry are adverse). Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met. TA-W-60,778; Northern Expediting Corporation, Union, NJ: January 9, 2006. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the Trade Act have been met. TA-W-60,281; Airtex Products LP, Marked Tree, AR: October 20, 2005. TA-W-60,611; BMCI Rodgers Molding Corp., A Subsidiary of Bulk Molding Compounds, El Paso, TX: December 13, 2005. TA-W-60,664; Hoffmann—La Roche, Inc., Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing Department, Nutley, NJ: December 21, 2005. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met. TA-W-60,728; Hoover Universal, Inc., d/b/a Johnson Controls, AG Division, Oklahoma City, OK: December 13, 2005. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act have been met. Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. TA-W-60,319; Rose Art Industries, LLC, Wood Ridge, NJ: October 24, 2005. TA-W-60,319A; Rose Art Industries, LLC, Livingston, NJ: October 24, 2005. TA-W-60,675; Pittsburgh Corning Corp., Glass Block Division, Port Allegany, PA: December 21, 2005. TA-W-60,677; Win Depot, LLC, Long Island City, NY: December 27, 2005. TA-W-60,680; Cecilware Corporation, Long Island City, NY: December 18, 2005. TA-W-60,712; Keneric Corporation, Obion Plant, Obion, TN: December 28, 2005. TA-W-60,712A; Keneric Corporation, Altamont Plant, Altamont, TN: December 28, 2005. TA-W-60,713; Missouri Fabricated Products, Gleason Corporation, Caruthersville, MO: January 5, 2006. TA-W-60,722; Kirchner Corporation, Golden Valley, MN: January 8, 2006. TA-W-60,731; Best Manufacturing Co., Menlo, GA: January 9, 2006. TA-W-60,749; Narrow Fabric Industries Corp., A Subsidiary of Cheynet Group, West Reading, PA: January 9, 2006. TA-W-60,774; Rayloc, Inc., Stephenville, TX: January 16, 2006. TA-W-60,803; Fluidyne Manufacturing/Lorenz Industries, Staffworks, Inc., Ansonia, CT: January 19, 2006. TA-W-60,815; Dicey Mills, Inc., Shelby, NC: January 22, 2007. TA-W-60,445; Manchester Tool Co., Akron, OH: November 14, 2005. TA-W-60,486A; Alma Products Co., Torque Converters, Alma, MI: November 22, 2005. TA-W-60,500; Potlatch Forest Products Corporation, Warren Lumber Mill, Warren, AR: November 29, 2005. TA-W-60,538; Hipwell Manufacturing Holding Co., Pittsburgh, PA: December 4, 2005. TA-W-60,589; Ace Industries, LLC, Lineville, AL: December 11, 2005. TA-W-60,591; Leggett and Platt, Inc., Bedding Division, Phoenix, AZ: December 5, 2005. TA-W-60,592; South End Manufacturing, Lawrenceburg, TN: December 6, 2005. TA-W-60,607; Stimson Lumber Company, Bonner Stud Mill, Bonner, MT: December 5, 2005. TA-W-60,612; Riley Creek Lumber Company, Moyie Springs Mill, Moyie Springs, ID: December 13, 2005. TA-W-60,761; Doyle Enterprises, Inc., Rock Mount, VA: January 11, 2006. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. TA-W-60,637; Zomax, Inc., Plymouth, MN: December 18, 2005. TA-W-60,649; Strattec Security Corp., Service Department, Milwaukee, WI: December 14, 2005. TA-W-60,650; Bourns, Inc., Formerly Known As SSI Technologies, Inc., Janesville, WI: December 19, 2005. TA-W-60,654; Badger Fire Protection / UTC Fire and Security, Badger Fire Protection Division, Charlottesville, VA: December 20, 2005. TA-W-60,689; Ronfeldt Associates, Inc., Toledo, OH: December 21, 2005. TA-W-60,690; Bestop, Inc., Broomfield, CO: January 2, 2006. TA-W-60,701; Uniflex Holdings, Inc., Hicksville, NY: January 3, 2006. TA-W-60,701A; Uniflex Holdings, Inc., Westbury, NY: January 3, 2006. TA-W-60,711; Hurd Lock and Manufacturing Co., Greenville, TN: January 4, 2006. TA-W-60,717; Lear Corporation, Seating Systems Division, Romulus, MI: January 5, 2006. TA-W-60,718; Renfro Charleston, LLC, Cleveland, TN: January 2, 2006. TA-W-60,720; Specialty Electronics, Inc., Delphi Connection Systems Division, Landrum, SC: January 15, 2007. TA-W-60,723; Pechiney Plastic Packaging, Inc., A Subsidiary of Alcan, Tubes America Division, Washington, NJ: March 10, 2006. TA-W-60,725; Birds Eye Foods, Inc., Watsonville, CA: January 9, 2006. TA-W-60,730; Jabil Circuit, Inc., Auburn Hills, MI: May 14, 2006. TA-W-60,732; Trend Tool, Inc., A Subsidiary of Magna International, Livonia, MI: December 19, 2005. TA-W-60,736; Cooper Power System, Cooper Industries, Kearney Operations, Fayetteville, AR: January 27, 2007. TA-W-60,737; Atwood Mobile Products, Division of Dura Automotive Systems, Inc., LaGrange, IN: January 3, 2006. TA-W-60,746; D J, Inc., Adecco and Staff Store, El Paso, TX: January 10, 2006. TA-W-60,752; Alcoa Engineered Plastic Components, AFL Automotive Division, El Paso, TX: January 11, 2006. TA-W-60,766; Travel Tags, Inver Grove Heights, MN: January 12, 2006. TA-W-60,784; Victaulic Company, Apex Valve Trim Assembly, New Village, NJ: January 17, 2006. TA-W-60,829; F and M Hat Company, Inc., Denver, PA: January 24, 2006. TA-W-60,858; Delphi Corporation, Automotive Holdings Group, Anderson, IN: January 23, 2006. TA-W-60,616; APW Enclosures, Anaheim, CA: December 14, 2005. TA-W-60,667; Icelandic USA, Inc., Cambridge, MD: December 22, 2005. TA-W-60,669; Connor Corporation, Fort Wayne, IN: December 27, 2005. TA-W-60,745; Bush Industries, Inc., Erie, PA: January 10, 2006. TA-W-60,767; Portola Tech International, Staff-U-Smart, Woonsocket, RI: December 22, 2005. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. TA-W-60,520; Lear Corporation, Electric Systems Division, Southfield, MI: November 30, 2005. TA-W-60,622; ArvinMeritor, Inc, Light Vehicles, Olsten Staffing, Mullins, SC: December 5, 2005. TA-W-60,641; Collis, Inc., A Subsidiary of SSW Holding Co., Evansville, IN: December 19, 2005. TA-W-60,678; Keystone Powdered Metal Company, St. Mary's Division, St. Mary's, PA: December 28, 2005. TA-W-60,679; Greenwood Mills, Inc., Mathews Plant, Greenwood, SC: December 19, 2005. TA-W-60,706; Ameritex Yarn, LLC, Spartanburg Plant, Spartanburg, SC: January 2, 2006. TA-W-60,727; Johnson Controls, Inc., Automotive Division, Chesapeake, VA: January 9, 2006. TA-W-60,733; L and R Knitting, Inc., Hickory, NC: January 8, 2006. TA-W-60,743; Atotech USA, Inc., Subsidiary of Total S.A., Express Personnel, On Assignment, Rock Hill, SC: January 9, 2006. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. None. Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, it has been determined that the requirements of 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for the reasons specified. The Department has determined that criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of age or older. TA-W-60,778; Northern Expediting Corporation, Union, NJ. TA-W-60,281; Airtex Products LP, Marked Tree, AR. TA-W-60,611; BMCI Rodgers Molding Corp., A Subsidiary of Bulk Molding Compounds, El Paso, TX. TA-W-60,728; Hoover Universal, Inc., d/b/a Johnson Controls, AG Division, Oklahoma City, OK. The Department has determined that criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily transferable. TA-W-60,664; Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc., Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing Department, Nutley, NJ. The Department has determined that criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been met. Competition conditions within the workers' industry are not adverse. None. Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified. Because the workers of the firm are not eligible to apply for TAA, the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA. The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.) (employment decline) have not been met. TA-W-60,631; Jay-Enn Corporation, Troy, MI. TA-W-60,780; Cer-Tek, Inc., El Paso, TX. The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met. TA-W-60,571; Caribe General Electric, Humacao, PR. TA-W-60,714; Extreme Tool and Engineering, Wakefield, MI. TA-W-60,741; E.J. Victor, Inc., Case Goods Division, Morganton, NC. TA-W-60,754; Page Foam Cushioned Products, Johnstown, PA. The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met. TA-W-60,486; Alma Products Co., A/C Compressors, Alma, MI. TA-W-60,490; Bollag International Corp., Greenwood, SC. TA-W-60,516; Milliken and Company, Kingstree Mill Division, Kingstree, SC. TA-W-60,530; Tower Automotive, Inc., Upper Sandusky, OH. TA-W-60,577; Dixie Regency Foam, Division of Hickory Springs Mfg. Co., Hickory, NC. TA-W-60,610; Belding Hausman, Inc., Southampton Textiles Division, Emporia, VA. TA-W-60,625; Huntington Foam Pittsburgh Corp., A Subsidiary of Huntington Foam Corp., Mt. Pleasant, PA. TA-W-60,626; Baseline Tool Company, Inc., Wawaka, IN. TA-W-60,656; Carpenter Company, Consumer Products Division, Hickory, NC. TA-W-60,775; Oxbow Machine Products, Livonia, MI. TA-W-60,597; Mason County Forest Products, Shelton, WA. TA-W-60,647; Ito Cariani Foods, Hayward, CA. TA-W-60,685; ACE Style Intimate Apparel, Inc., New York, NY. The investigation revealed that the predominate cause of worker separations is unrelated to criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.C) (shift in production to a foreign country under a free trade agreement or a beneficiary country under a preferential trade agreement, or there has been or is likely to be an increase in imports). None. The workers' firm does not produce an article as required for certification under section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974. TA-W-60,505; Calstar Textiles, Inc., Vernon, CA. TA-W-60,529; Hospira, Inc., Shared Services Department, Rocky Mount, NC. TA-W-60,606; Pfizer, Inc., Pfizer Global Research and Development Group, Kalamazoo, MI. TA-W-60,651; AOL LLC, Oklahoma City Call Center, Oklahoma City, OK. TA-W-60,768; IDT Corporation, IDT Telecom, Newark, NJ. The investigation revealed that criteria of section 222(b)(2) has not been met. The workers' firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier to or a downstream producer for a firm whose workers were certified eligible to apply for TAA. TA-W-60,495; Dumaine Investment Company, dba Industrial Tool and Engineering, Warrenville, SC. I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of January 22 through February 2, 2007. Copies of these determinations are available for inspection in Room C-5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 during normal business hours or will be mailed to persons who write to the above address. Dated: February 6, 2007. Linda G. Poole, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7-2474 Filed 2-13-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-60,415] United Healthcare Services, Inc., Contract Administration, Chico, California; Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at United Healthcare Services, Inc., Contract Administration, Chico, California. The application did not contain new information supporting a conclusion that the determination was erroneous, and also did not provide a justification for reconsideration of the determination that was based on either mistaken facts or a misinterpretation of facts or of the law. Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued. TA-W-60,415; United Healthcare Services, Inc., Contract Administration, Chico, California (February 7, 2007). Signed at Washington, DC this 8th day of February 2007. Linda G. Poole, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7-2471 Filed 2-13-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request AGENCY: National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: NARA is giving public notice that the agency proposes to request extension of a currently approved information collection, NATF Form 36, Microfilm Publication Order Form, used by customers/researchers for ordering roll(s) or microfiche of a microfilm publication. The public is invited to comment on the proposed information collection pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before April 16, 2007 to be assured of consideration. ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to: Paperwork Reduction Act Comments (NHP), Room 4400, National Archives and Records Administration, 8601 Adelphi Rd, College Park, MD 20740-6001; or faxed to 301-713-7409; or electronically mailed to . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or copies of the proposed information collection and supporting statement should be directed to Tamee Fechhelm at telephone number 301-837-1694, or fax number 301-713-7409. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13), NARA invites the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on proposed information collections. The comments and suggestions should address one or more of the following points: (a) Whether the proposed information collection is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of NARA; (b) the accuracy of NARA's estimate of the burden of the proposed information collection; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways, including the use of information technology, to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents; and (e) whether small businesses are affected by this collection. The comments that are submitted will be summarized and included in the NARA request for Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval. All comments will become a matter of public record. In this notice, NARA is soliciting comments concerning the following information collection: Title: Microfilm Publication Order Form. OMB number: 3095-0046. Agency form number: NATF Form 36. Type of review: Regular. Affected public: Business or for-profit, nonprofit organizations and institutions, federal, state and local government agencies, and individuals or households. Estimated number of respondents: 600. Estimated time per response: 10 minutes. Frequency of response: On occasion. Estimated total annual burden hours: 100 hours. Abstract: The information collection is prescribed by 36 CFR 1254.72. The collection is prepared by researchers who cannot visit the appropriate NARA research room or who request copies of records as a result of visiting a research room. NARA offers limited provisions to obtain copies of records by mail and requires requests to be made on prescribed forms for certain bodies of records. The National Archives Trust Fund (NATF) Form 36 (09/05), Microfilm Publication Order Form, is used by customers/researchers for ordering a roll, rolls, or a microfiche of a microfilm publication. Dated: February 8, 2007. Martha Morphy, Assistant Archivist for Information Services. [FR Doc. E7-2521 Filed 2-13-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7515-01-P NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION Sunshine Act Meeting Time and Date: 11:30 a.m., Thursday, February 15, 2007. Place: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-3428. Status: Closed. Matters to Be Considered: 1. Administrative Action under Section 208 of the Federal Credit Union Act. Closed pursuant to Exemptions (8), (9)(A)(ii), and (B). For Further Information Contact: Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304. Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board. [FR Doc. 07-700 Filed 2-12-07; 12:31 pm]

Connectionstraces to 2
6 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 102-575
  • Pub. L. 103-394
  • Pub. L. 109-8
  • 5 CFR 1320.10
  • 29 CFR 90.18(C)
  • Pub. L. 104-13
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Notice of availability
Pub. L.Pub. L. 102-575
Pub. L.Pub. L. 103-394
Pub. L.Pub. L. 109-8
Cite5 CFR 1320.10
Cite29 CFR 90.18(C)
Cites 8 · showing 7Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.