Notices. Notice
4,573 words·~21 min read·
/register/2007/01/18/07-142A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration A-427-801, A-428-801, A-475-801, A-588-804, A-559-801, A-412-801 Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Singapore, and the United Kingdom: Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. EFFECTIVE DATE: January 18, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Yang Jin Chun or Richard Rimlinger, AD/CVD Operations Office 5, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202)482-5760 and
(202)482-4477, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background At the request of interested parties, the Department of Commerce (the Department) initiated administrative reviews of the antidumping duty orders on ball bearings and parts thereof from France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Singapore, and the United Kingdom for the period May 1, 2005, through April 30, 2006. *See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews* , 71 FR 37892 (July 3, 2006). On October 16, 2006, we rescinded in part the administrative reviews of the antidumping duty orders on ball bearings and parts thereof from France, Germany, Japan, and the United Kingdom. See *Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from France, et al.: Notice of Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews* , 71 FR 60688 (October 16, 2006). The preliminary results of the reviews still underway are currently due no later than January 31, 2007. Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires the Department to make a preliminary determination within 245 days after the last day of the anniversary month of an order for which a review is requested and a final determination within 120 days after the date on which the preliminary determination is published. If it is not practicable to complete the review within these time periods, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the Department to extend the time limit for the preliminary determination to a maximum of 365 days after the last day of the anniversary month. We determine that it is not practicable to complete the preliminary results of these reviews within the original time limit because of the number of respondents in these reviews, plans to verify certain respondents' information, and the complexity of the issues under analysis, such as further-manufacturing operations in the United States and the “collapsing” of companies. Therefore, we are extending the time period for issuing the preliminary results of these reviews by 45 days until March 19, 2007. This notice is published in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2). Dated: January 11, 2007. Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E7-657 Filed 1-17-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration (A-401-806) Notice of Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Sweden AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. EFFECTIVE DATE: January 18, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Smith, AD/CVD Operations, Office 2, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C., 20230; telephone:
(202)482-1766. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On October 6, 2006, the Department of Commerce (“the Department”) published in the **Federal Register** the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on stainless steel wire rod from Sweden, covering the period September 1, 2004, through August 31, 2005. *See Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Sweden: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review* , 71 FR 59082 (October 6, 2006). The current deadline for the final results in this review is February 3, 2007. 1 1 Since February 3, 2007, is a Saturday, the final results are due on the next business day, February 5, 2007. Extension of Time Limits for Final Results of Review Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (“the Act”), requires the Department to issue the final results of the review of an antidumping duty order within 120 days after the date on which the preliminary results is published in the **Federal Register** . However, if it is not practicable to complete the review within this time period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the Department to extend the time limit for the final results to 180 days from the date of publication of the preliminary results. The Department finds that it is not practicable to complete the final results of the administrative review of stainless steel wire rod from the Sweden within the current time frame due to the fact that the Department requires more time to fully analyze the arguments and comments received from the parties participating in this review with respect to the model matching criteria currently being used in this case. Therefore, in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the Department is extending the time for completion of the final results of this review until April 4, 2007, which is 180 days after the date on which notice of the preliminary results was published in the **Federal Register** . We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777 (i)(1) of the Act. Dated: January 11, 2006. Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E7-658 Filed 1-17-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration A-570-890 Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's Republic of China: Initiation of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (“Department”) has received information sufficient to warrant initiation of a changed circumstances review of the antidumping duty order on wooden bedroom furniture (“WBF”) from the People's Republic of China (“PRC”). Based on a request filed by Tradewinds Furniture Ltd. (“Tradewinds Furniture”) and Tradewinds International Enterprise Ltd. (“Tradewinds International”), the Department is initiating a changed circumstances review to determine whether Tradewinds Furniture and Tradewinds International are successors-in-interest to Nanhai Jiantai Woodwork Co. (“Nanhai Jiantai”) and its affiliated exporter, Fortune Glory Industrial Limited Co. (“Fortune Glory”), respondents in the original investigation. EFFECTIVE DATE: January 18, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Juanita H. Chen or Robert A. Bolling, AD/CVD Operations, Office 8, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 202-482-1904 or 202-482-3434, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On January 4, 2005, the Department published in the **Federal Register** the antidumping duty order on WBF from the PRC. *See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China* , 70 FR 329 (January 4, 2005). As part of the antidumping duty order on WBF from the PRC, Nanhai Jiantai and Fortune Glory received a separate rate of 6.65 percent. *Id* . at 70 FR at 331. On November 22, 2006, Tradewinds Furniture and Tradewinds International filed a joint submission requesting that the Department conduct a changed circumstances review of the antidumping duty order on WBF from the PRC to confirm that Tradewinds Furniture and Tradewinds International are the successors-in-interest to Nanhai Jiantai and Fortune Glory. On November 30, 2006, Tradewinds Furniture and Tradewinds International filed a submission providing a public version of a chart included in their November 22, 2006 request. In their submissions, Tradewinds Furniture and Tradewinds International provided information on the events leading to the transition from Nanhai Jiantai and Fortune Glory to Tradewinds Furniture and Tradewinds International. Tradewinds Furniture and Tradewinds International also provided documentation relating to the change in name of Nanhai Jiantai to Foshian Jiantai and, thereafter, the purchase of Foshian Jiantai and establishment of Tradewinds Furniture to carry on the business of Foshian Jiantai, as well as documentation relating to the ownership structure and management, organizational structure, production facilities and equipment, supplier relationships, customer base, and production quantity, products and pricing. As part of their November 22, 2006, submission, Tradewinds Furniture and Tradewinds International also requested that the Department conduct an expedited review. Scope of Order The product covered by the order is wooden bedroom furniture. Wooden bedroom furniture is generally, but not exclusively, designed, manufactured, and offered for sale in coordinated groups, or bedrooms, in which all of the individual pieces are of approximately the same style and approximately the same material and/or finish. The subject merchandise is made substantially of wood products, including both solid wood and also engineered wood products made from wood particles, fibers, or other wooden materials such as plywood, oriented strand board, particle board, and fiberboard, with or without wood veneers, wood overlays, or laminates, with or without non-wood components or trim such as metal, marble, leather, glass, plastic, or other resins, and whether or not assembled, completed, or finished. The subject merchandise includes the following items:
(1)Wooden beds such as loft beds, bunk beds, and other beds;
(2)wooden headboards for beds (whether stand-alone or attached to side rails), wooden footboards for beds, wooden side rails for beds, and wooden canopies for beds;
(3)night tables, night stands, dressers, commodes, bureaus, mule chests, gentlemen's chests, bachelor's chests, lingerie chests, wardrobes, vanities, chessers, chifforobes, and wardrobe-type cabinets;
(4)dressers with framed glass mirrors that are attached to, incorporated in, sit on, or hang over the dresser;
(5)chests-on-chests 1 , highboys 2 , lowboys 3 , chests of drawers 4 , chests 5 , door chests 6 , chiffoniers 7 , hutches 8 , and armoires 9 ;
(6)desks, computer stands, filing cabinets, book cases, or writing tables that are attached to or incorporated in the subject merchandise; and
(7)other bedroom furniture consistent with the above list. 1 A chest-on-chest is typically a tall chest-of-drawers in two or more sections (or appearing to be in two or more sections), with one or two sections mounted (or appearing to be mounted) on a slightly larger chest; also known as a tallboy. 2 A highboy is typically a tall chest of drawers usually composed of a base and a top section with drawers, and supported on four legs or a small chest (often 15 inches or more in height). 3 A lowboy is typically a short chest of drawers, not more than four feet high, normally set on short legs. 4 A chest of drawers is typically a case containing drawers for storing clothing. 5 A chest is typically a case piece taller than it is wide featuring a series of drawers and with or without one or more doors for storing clothing. The piece can either include drawers or be designed as a large box incorporating a lid. 6 A door chest is typically a chest with hinged doors to store clothing, whether or not containing drawers. The piece may also include shelves for televisions and other entertainment electronics. 7 A chiffonier is typically a tall and narrow chest of drawers normally used for storing undergarments and lingerie, often with mirror(s) attached. 8 A hutch is typically an open case of furniture with shelves that typically sits on another piece of furniture and provides storage for clothes. 9 An armoire is typically a tall cabinet or wardrobe (typically 50 inches or taller), with doors, and with one or more drawers (either exterior below or above the doors or interior behind the doors), shelves, and/or garment rods or other apparatus for storing clothes. Bedroom armoires may also be used to hold television receivers and/or other audio-visual entertainment systems. The scope of the order excludes the following items:
(1)Seats, chairs, benches, couches, sofas, sofa beds, stools, and other seating furniture;
(2)mattresses, mattress supports (including box springs), infant cribs, water beds, and futon frames;
(3)office furniture, such as desks, stand-up desks, computer cabinets, filing cabinets, credenzas, and bookcases;
(4)dining room or kitchen furniture such as dining tables, chairs, servers, sideboards, buffets, corner cabinets, china cabinets, and china hutches;
(5)other non-bedroom furniture, such as television cabinets, cocktail tables, end tables, occasional tables, wall systems, book cases, and entertainment systems;
(6)bedroom furniture made primarily of wicker, cane, osier, bamboo or rattan;
(7)side rails for beds made of metal if sold separately from the headboard and footboard;
(8)bedroom furniture in which bentwood parts predominate 10 ;
(9)jewelry armories 11 ;
(10)cheval mirrors 12 ;
(11)certain metal parts 13 ; and
(12)mirrors that do not attach to, incorporate in, sit on, or hang over a dresser if they are not designed and marketed to be sold in conjunction with a dresser as part of a dresser-mirror set. 10 As used herein, bentwood means solid wood made pliable. Bentwood is wood that is brought to a curved shape by bending it while made pliable with moist heat or other agency and then set by cooling or drying. *See* Customs' Headquarters' Ruling Letter 043859, dated May 17, 1976. 11 Any armoire, cabinet or other accent item for the purpose of storing jewelry, not to exceed 24″ in width, 18″ in depth, and 49″ in height, including a minimum of 5 lined drawers lined with felt or felt-like material, at least one side door lined with felt or felt-like material, with necklace hangers, and a flip-top lid with inset mirror. *See* Issues and Decision Memorandum from Laurel LaCivita to Laurie Parkhill, Office Director, Concerning Jewelry Armoires and Cheval Mirrors in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's Republic of China, dated August 31, 2004. *See also Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's Republic of China: Notice of Final Results of Changed Circumstances Review and Revocation in Part* , 71 FR 38621 (July 7, 2006). 12 Cheval mirrors are, *i.e.* , any framed, tiltable mirror with a height in excess of 50″ that is mounted on a floor-standing, hinged base. Additionally, the scope of the order excludes combination cheval mirror/jewelry cabinets. The excluded merchandise is an integrated piece consisting of a cheval mirror, *i.e.* , a framed tiltable mirror with a height in excess of 50 inches, mounted on a floor-standing, hinged base, the cheval mirror serving as a door to a cabinet back that is integral to the structure of the mirror and which constitutes a jewelry cabinet lined with fabric, having necklace and bracelet hooks, mountings for rings and shelves, with or without a working lock and key to secure the contents of the jewelry cabinet back to the cheval mirror, and no drawers anywhere on the integrated piece. The fully assembled piece must be at least 50 inches in height, 14.5 inches in width, and 3 inches in depth. 13 Metal furniture parts and unfinished furniture parts made of wood products (as defined above) that are not otherwise specifically named in this scope ( *i.e.* , wooden headboards for beds, wooden footboards for beds, wooden side rails for beds, and wooden canopies for beds) and that do not possess the essential character of wooden bedroom furniture in an unassembled, incomplete, or unfinished form. Such parts are usually classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) subheading 9403.90.7000. Imports of subject merchandise are classified under subheading 9403.50.9040 of the HTSUS as “wooden . . . beds” and under subheading 9403.50.9080 of the HTSUS as “other . . . wooden furniture of a kind used in the bedroom.” In addition, wooden headboards for beds, wooden footboards for beds, wooden side rails for beds, and wooden canopies for beds may also be entered under subheading 9403.50.9040 of the HTSUS as “parts of wood” and framed glass mirrors may also be entered under subheading 7009.92.5000 of the HTSUS as “glass mirrors . . . framed.” This order covers all wooden bedroom furniture meeting the above description, regardless of tariff classification. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, our written description of the scope of this proceeding is dispositive. Initiation of Changed Circumstances Review Pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (“Act”), the Department will conduct a changed circumstances review upon receipt of information concerning, or a request from an interested party for a review of, an antidumping duty order, which shows changed circumstances sufficient to warrant a review of the order. Additionally, section 751(b)(4) of the Act states that the Department shall not conduct a review less than 24 months after the date of publication of the determination, in the absence of good cause. As noted above, Tradewinds Furniture and Tradewinds International filed their request for a changed circumstances review on November 22, 2006, a little over 22 months after the publication of the amended final determination and order. *See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China* , 70 FR 329 (January 4, 2005). However, Tradewinds Furniture and Tradewinds International argue that the request is timely because it was filed more than 24 months after the date of publication of the Department's original final determination. *See Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China* , 69 FR 67313 (November 17, 2004). Tradewinds Furniture and Tradewinds International also argue that, even if the Department were to consider the request in relation to the amended final determination, the Department has previously found that a change in corporate structure is sufficient as “good cause” to conduct a review less than 24 months after the date of publication of the determination. *Citing Initiation of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Certain Softwood Lumber Products From Canada* , 68 FR 14947, 14948 (March 27, 2003); *Bulk Aspirin From the People's Republic of China; Initiation of Changed Circumstances Antidumping Duty Administrative Review* , 67 FR 39344, 39345 (June 7, 2002). In this instance, the Department agrees with Tradewinds Furniture and Tradewinds International that we have previously found a change in corporate structure request for a successor-in-interest determination sufficient to warrant the initiation of a changed circumstances review. *See id* . Based on the information submitted by Tradewinds Furniture and Tradewinds International regarding the change in name and status of Nanhai Jiantai and Fortune Glory, the Department determines that sufficient good cause exists to conduct a changed circumstances review. In a changed circumstances review involving a successor-in-interest determination, the Department typically examines several factors including, but not limited to, changes in:
(1)Management;
(2)production facilities;
(3)supplier relationships; and
(4)customer base. *See Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from Romania: Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Antidumping Duty Administrative Review* , 70 FR 22847 (May 3, 2005). While no single factor or combination of factors will necessarily be dispositive, the Department generally will consider the new company to be the successor to the predecessor if the resulting operations are essentially the same as those of the predecessor company. *See* , *e.g.* , *Notice of Initiation of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Certain Forged Stainless Steel Flanges from India* , 71 FR 327 (January 4, 2006). Thus, if the record demonstrates that, with respect to the production and sale of the subject merchandise, the new company operates as the same business entity as the predecessor company, the Department may assign the new company the cash deposit rate of its predecessor. *See* , *e.g.* , *Fresh and Chilled Atlantic Salmon from Norway: Final Results of Changed Circumstances Antidumping Duty Administrative Review* , 64 FR 9979, 9980 (March 1, 1999). Based on the information provided in their submissions, Tradewinds Furniture and Tradewinds International have provided sufficient evidence to warrant a review to determine if they are the successors-in-interest to Nanhai Jiantai and Fortune Glory. Therefore, pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the Act and 19 C.F.R. 351.216(b), we are initiating a changed circumstances review. However, although Tradewinds Furniture and Tradewinds International submitted documentation relating to their name and status change from Nanhai Jiantai and Fortune Glory, they did not provide certain supporting documentation for the elements listed above. Accordingly, the Department does not consider the information sufficient to make a preliminary finding and has determined that it would be inappropriate to expedite this action by combining the preliminary results of review with this notice of initiation, as permitted under 19 C.F.R. 351.221(c)(3)(ii). As a result, the Department is not issuing preliminary results for this changed circumstances review at this time. Public Comment Interested parties may submit comments that the Department will take into account in the preliminary results of this changed circumstances review. The due date for filing any such comments is no later than 15 days from publication of this notice. Responses to those comments may be submitted no later than seven days from submission of the comments. All written comments must be submitted in accordance with 19 C.F.R. 351.303. The Department will issue questionnaires requesting factual information for this changed circumstances review, and will publish in the **Federal Register** a notice of preliminary results of the changed circumstances review, in accordance with 19 C.F.R. 351.221(b)(4) and 351.221(c)(3)(i). This notice will set forth the factual and legal conclusions upon which our preliminary results are based and a description of any action proposed based on those results. Pursuant to 19 C.F.R. 351.221(b)(4)(ii), interested parties will have an opportunity to comment on the preliminary results. The Department will issue its final results of this changed circumstances review in accordance with the time limits set forth in 19 C.F.R. 351.216(e). This notice is published in accordance with section 751(b)(1) of the Act and 19 C.F.R. 351.221(b). Dated: January 10, 2007. David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E7-643 Filed 1-17-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION Proposed Collection; Comment Request—Consumer Focus Groups AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC or Commission) requests comments on a proposed collection of information from persons who may participate in Consumer Focus Groups. The Commission will consider all comments received in response to this notice before requesting approval of this collection of information from the Office of Management and Budget. DATES: Written comments must be received by the Office of the Secretary not later than March 19, 2007. ADDRESSES: Written comments should be captioned “Consumer Focus Groups” and e-mailed to *cpsc-os@cpsc.gov.* Comments may also be sent by facsimile to
(301)504-0127, or by mail to the Office of the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland 20814. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information about the proposed collection of information call or write Linda L. Glatz, Division of Policy and Planning, Office of Information Technology and Technology Services, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland 20814;
(301)504-7671. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A. Background The Commission is authorized under section 5(a) of the Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA), 15 U.S.C. 2054(a), to collect information, conduct research, and perform studies and investigations relating to the causes and prevention of deaths, accidents, injuries, illnesses, other health impairments, and economic losses associated with consumer products. Section 5(b) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2054(b), further provides that the Commission may conduct research, studies and investigations on the safety of consumer products or test consumer products and develop product safety test methods and testing devices. In order to better identify and evaluate the risks of product-related incidents, the Commission staff seeks to solicit and obtain direct feedback from consumers on issues related to product safety such as recall effectiveness, product use, and perceptions regarding safety issues. Through participation in certain focus groups, consumers will be able to answer questions and provide information regarding their actual experiences, opinions and/or perceptions on the use or pattern of use of a specific product or type of product, including recalled products. The information collected from the Consumer Focus Groups will help inform the Commission's evaluation of consumer products and product use by providing insight and information into consumer perceptions and usage patterns. Such information may also assist the Commission in its efforts to support voluntary standards activities, and help the staff identify areas regarding consumer safety issues that need additional research. In addition, based on the information obtained, the staff may be able to provide safety information to the public that is easier to read and is more easily understood by a wider range of consumers. The Consumer Focus Groups also may be used to solicit consumer opinions and feedback regarding the effectiveness of product recall communications and in determining what action is being taken by consumers in response to such communications and why. This may aid in tailoring future recall activities to increase the success of those activities. If this information is not collected, the Commission may not have available certain useful information regarding consumer experiences, opinions, and perceptions related to specific product use, on which the Commission uses, in part, in its ongoing efforts to improve the safety of consumer products on behalf of consumers. B. Estimated Burden The Commission staff currently estimates that there may be up to 48 participants annually in the Consumer Focus Groups. The Commission staff estimates that the burden hours for each participant will not exceed 4 hours total. Thus, the Commission staff estimates that the annual burden could total approximately 192 hours per year. The Commission staff estimates the value of the time of respondents to this collection of information at $26.86 an hour. This is based on the 2006 U.S. Department of Labor Employer Costs for Employee Compensation. At this valuation, the estimated annual cost to the public of this information collection will be about $5,517 per year. C. Request for Comments The Commission solicits written comments from all interested persons about the proposed collection of information. The Commission specifically solicits information relevant to the following topics: —Whether the collection of information described above is necessary for the proper performance of the Commission's functions, including whether the information would have practical utility; —Whether the estimated burden of the proposed collection of information is accurate; —Whether the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected could be enhanced; and —Whether the burden imposed by the collection of information could be minimized by use of automated, electronic or other technological collection techniques, or other forms of information technology. Dated: January 10, 2007. Todd A. Stevenson, Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission. [FR Doc. E7-579 Filed 1-17-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6355-01-P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Department of the Army Reserve Officers' Training Corps
(ROTC)Program Subcommittee AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD. ACTION: Notice of open meeting. SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C., App. 2), announcement is made of the following Committee meeting: *Name of Committee:* Reserve Officers' Training Corps
(ROTC)Program Subcommittee. *Dates of Meeting:* February 13-14, 2007. *Location:* Sheraton Crystal City Hotel, 1800 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202. *Time:* 0730-1700 hours, February 13, 2007; 0730-1100 hours February 14, 2007. *Proposed Agenda:* Review and discuss the Army's philosophy on training and education as it applies to and impacts the Reserve Officers' Training Corps program. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Pierre Blackwell, U.S. Army Cadet Command (ATCC-TR), Fort Monroe, VA 23651 at
(757)788-4326. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting is open to the public. Any interested person may attend, appear before, or file statements with the committee. Brenda S. Bowen, Army Federal Register Liaison Officer. [FR Doc. 07-142 Filed 1-17-07; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 5
Traces to 5 documents
CFR
- Administrative review of orders and suspension agreements under section 751(a)(1) of the Act.§ 351.213
- Changed circumstances review under section 751(b) of the Act.§ 351.216
- Review procedures.§ 351.221
- Filing, document identification, format, translation, service, and certification of documents.§ 351.303
Citation graph
cites case law
Cites 5Cited by 0 across 0 sources