Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2006-12-12 · Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing, HUD · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Notice

1,641 words·~7 min read·/register/2006/12/12/06-9691·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing, HUD
Action: Notice
Citation: 71 FR (No. 238) · FR Doc. 06-9691 · Docket No. FR-5055-N-01

Summary

Senate Report 109-109, which accompanied HUD's Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 appropriations act, provides for HUD to reassess through notice and comment rulemaking its use of multi-race data in the computation of the Need component of the Indian Housing Block Grant (IHBG) program allocation formula. Through the IHBG program, HUD provides Federal housing assistance to Indian tribes in a manner that recognizes the right of Indian self-determination and tribal self-government. Consistent with the language of Senate Report 109-109, this notice solicits public comment on HUD's use of multi-race data in the computation of the IHBG program allocation formula. Following HUD's review and consideration of the comments received, HUD may proceed with additional rulemaking as necessary.

Dates

Comment Due Date: February 12, 2007.

Supplementary Information

I. Background Senate Report 109-109, which accompanied the Transportation, Treasury, Housing and Urban Development, the Judiciary, the District of Columbia, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 2006 (Pub. L. 109-115; approved November 30, 2005), provides for HUD to reassess through “notice and comment rulemaking” its use of multi-race data in the computation of the Need component of the IHBG program allocation formula. Through the IHBG program, HUD provides Federal housing assistance to Indian tribes in a manner that recognizes the right of Indian self-determination and tribal self-government. HUD's regulations for the IHBG program, which were developed with active tribal participation using negotiated rulemaking procedures, are located at 24 CFR part 1000. As authorized under title I of the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996 (25 U.S.C. 4101 et seq. ), this program provides an allocation of funds on a formula basis to Indian tribes or their tribally designated housing entities to help them address the housing needs within their communities. The formula, which was developed as part of the negotiated rulemaking process, consists of two components—Need and Formula Current Assisted Stock (FCAS). A regulatory description of the formula is located in subpart D of 24 CFR part 1000 (§§ 1000.301-1000.340). Generally, the amount of funding for a tribe is the sum of the formula's Need component and the Formula Current Assisted Stock (FCAS) component, subject to a minimum funding amount authorized by § 1000.328. Based on the amount of funding appropriated annually for the IHBG program, HUD calculates the annual grant for each tribe and conveys this information to Indian tribes. HUD's current regulations at § 1000.330 describe the sources of data HUD will use to determine the Need component variables. The regulations state that the data shall be “data available that is collected in a uniform manner that can be confirmed and verified for all AIAN [American Indian Alaska Native] households and persons living in an identified area. Initially, the data used are U.S. Decennial Census data.” The most recent Decennial Census in 2000, for the first time, allowed respondents to claim that they are “American Indian Alaska Native (AIAN) in combination with other racial groups” (multi-race), or to report their race as “AIAN only” (single race). The current regulation does not specify the use of single race or multi-race data. Accordingly, HUD exercised the discretion provided by the regulation to determine that the 2000 Census categories of “AIAN alone” and “AIAN in combination with other racial groups” represented the best available data to accomplish the statutory purposes of the IHBG program. HUD concluded that it is the most inclusive definition of AIAN persons and ensures that no such persons are excluded. Accordingly, in Fiscal Years (FY) 2004 and 2005, HUD issued its IHBG funding by using multi-race census data for making funding allocations. For FY2006, Congress directed the Department to calculate funding allocations under the need component of the IHBG formula using multi-race and single race Census data, and to award each tribe the higher of the two calculations. Title III of the FY2006 Transportation, Treasury, Housing and Urban Development, the Judiciary, the District of Columbia, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act provided that, “notwithstanding the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996, to determine the amount of the allocation under title I of such Act for each Indian tribe, the Secretary shall apply the formula under section 302 of such Act with the need component based on single-race Census data and with the need component based on multi-race Census data, and the amount of the allocation for each Indian tribe shall be the greater of the two resulting allocation amounts:”. The IHBG Formula Negotiated Rulemaking Committee (Committee) discussed the use of multi-race data during its 2003-2005 negotiations. HUD established the Committee, consisting of tribal and HUD representatives, to negotiate and develop proposed regulatory changes to the IHBG allocation formula regulations. The Committee was unable to reach consensus on changes to current regulatory language at § 1000.330 regarding the use of census data. The proposed rule negotiated by the Committee was published on February 25, 2005 (70 FR 9489), and is currently in the process of being made final. Additional information regarding the Committee's discussion on the use of multi-race census data can be found in the preamble of the proposed rule ( see 70 FR 9496). II. This Notice Consistent with the language of Senate Report 109-109, this notice invites public comment on HUD's use of multi-race data in the computation of the IHBG program allocation formula. Specifically, HUD invites public comments on the feasibility of using either single race or multi-race data to determine funding for the Need component of the IHBG formula. As noted above, the regulations at 1000.330 do not address the use of multi-race or single race census data. Accordingly, at this time, HUD is not proposing a regulatory change. Following HUD's review and consideration of the comments received on this notice, HUD may proceed with rulemaking as necessary. Dated: December 1, 2006. Orlando J. Cabrera, Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing. [FR Doc. E6-20939 Filed 12-11-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4210-67-P 71 238 Tuesday, December 12, 2006 Presidential Documents Part VIII The President Memorandum of December 8, 2006—Designation of Officers of the Department of Justice Title 3— The President Memorandum of December 8, 2006 Designation of Officers of the Department of Justice Memorandum for the Attorney General By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, 5 U.S.C. 3345 et seq ., I hereby order that: Section 1. Order of Succession. During any period when the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, the Associate Attorney General, and the officers designated by the Attorney General pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 508 to act as Attorney General have died, resigned, or otherwise become unable to perform the functions and duties of the office of Attorney General, the following officers of the Department of Justice, in the order listed, shall perform the functions and duties of the office of Attorney General, if they are eligible to act as Attorney General under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, until such time as at least one of the officers mentioned above is able to perform the functions and duties of the office of Attorney General: United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York; United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia; and United States Attorney for the Western District of Texas. Sec. 2. Exceptions. (a) No individual who is serving in an office listed in section 1 in an acting capacity, by virtue of so serving, shall act as Attorney General pursuant to this memorandum. (b) Notwithstanding the provisions of this memorandum, the President retains discretion, to the extent permitted by the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, 5 U.S.C. 3345 et seq ., to depart from this memorandum in designating an acting Attorney General. Sec. 3. The Memorandum for the Attorney General of March 19, 2002, entitled “Designation of Officers of the Department of Justice,” is hereby revoked. Sec. 4. The Attorney General is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register . GWBOLD.EPS THE WHITE HOUSE, Washington, December 8, 2006. [FR Doc. 06-9691 Filed 12-11-06; 10:31 am]

Connectionstraces to 3
2 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 109-115
  • 24 CFR 1000
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Notice
Pub. L.Pub. L. 109-115
Cite24 CFR 1000
Cites 5Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.