Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2006-10-16 · National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), HHS · Notices

Notices. Announcement of a meeting and request for public comment

3,398 words·~15 min read·/register/2006/10/16/06-8668

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health National Toxicology Program (NTP); Center for the Evaluation of Risks to Human Reproduction (CERHR); Availability of the Draft Expert Panel Report on Hydroxyurea and Request for Public Comment on the Draft Report; Announcement of the Hydroxyurea Expert Panel Meeting AGENCY: National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), HHS. ACTION: Announcement of a meeting and request for public comment.
SUMMARY: The CERHR announces the availability of the draft expert panel report for hydroxyurea on November 1, 2006, from the CERHR Web site ( *http://cerhr.niehs.nih.gov* ) or in printed text from the CERHR ( *see* FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT below). The CERHR invites the submission of public comments on sections 1-4 of the draft expert panel report ( *see* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION below). The expert panel will meet on January 24-26, 2007, at the Radisson Hotel Old Town in Alexandria, VA, to review and revise the draft expert panel report and reach conclusions regarding whether exposure to hydroxyurea is a hazard to human development or reproduction.
The expert panel will also identify data gaps and research needs. CERHR expert panel meetings are open to the public with time scheduled for oral public comment. Attendance is limited only by the available meeting room space. Following the expert panel meeting and completion of the expert panel report, the CERHR will post the final report on its Web site and solicit public comment on it through a **Federal Register** notice. DATES: The expert panel meeting for hydroxyurea will be held on January 24-26, 2007.
Sections 1-4 of the draft expert panel report will be available for public comment on November 1, 2006. Written public comments on the draft report must be received by December 15, 2006. Time is set-aside at the expert panel meeting on January 24, 2007 for oral public comments. Individuals wishing to make oral public comments are asked to contact Dr. Michael D. Shelby, CERHR Director, by January 17, 2007, and if possible, send a copy of the statement or talking points at that time.
Persons needing special assistance in order to attend are asked to contact Dr. Shelby at least 7 business days prior to the meeting. ADDRESSES: The expert panel meeting on hydroxyurea will be held at the Radisson Hotel Old Town 901 N. Fairfax Street Alexandria, VA 22314-1501 (telephone: 703-683-6000, facsimile: 703-683-7597). Comments on the draft expert panel report should be sent to Dr. Michael D. Shelby, CERHR Director, NIEHS, P.O. Box 12233, MD EC-32, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 (mail),
(919)316-4511 (fax), or *shelby@niehs.nih.gov* (e-mail). Courier address: CERHR, 79 T.W. Alexander Drive, Building 4401, Room 103, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Michael D. Shelby, CERHR Director, 919-541-3455, *shelby@niehs.nih.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background *Hydroxyurea (CAS RN:* 127-07-1) is used in the treatment of cancer, sickle cell disease, and thalassemia. It is the only treatment for sickle cell disease used in children aside from blood transfusion. Hydroxyurea may be used in the treatment of children and adults with sickle cell disease for an extended period of time or for repeated cycles of therapy. Treatment with hydroxyurea may be associated with cytotoxic and myelosuppressive effects and hydroxyurea is mutagenic. Hydroxyurea is FDA-approved for reducing the frequency of painful crises and the need for blood transfusions in adults with sickle cell anemia who experience recurrent moderate to severe painful crises. CERHR selected this chemical for evaluation because of
(1)increasing use in the treatment of sickle cell disease in children and adults,
(2)knowledge that it inhibits DNA synthesis and is cytotoxic, and
(3)published evidence of reproductive and developmental toxicity in rodents. At the expert panel meeting, the expert panel will review and revise the draft expert panel report and reach conclusions regarding whether exposure to hydroxyurea is a hazard to human reproduction or development. Each draft expert panel report has the following sections: 1.0 Chemistry, Use, and Human Exposure. 2.0 General Toxicological and Biological Effects. 3.0 Developmental Toxicity Data. 4.0 Reproductive Toxicity Data. 5.0 Summary, Conclusions, and Critical Data Needs (to be prepared at expert panel meeting). Request for Comments The CERHR invites written public comments on sections 1-4 of the draft expert panel report on hydroxyurea. Any comments received will be posted on the CERHR Web site prior to the meeting and distributed to the expert panel and CERHR staff for their consideration in revising the draft report and preparing for the expert panel meeting. Persons submitting written comments are asked to include their name and contact information (affiliation, mailing address, telephone and facsimile numbers, e-mail, and sponsoring organization, if any) and send them to Dr. Shelby ( *see* ADDRESSES above) for receipt by December 15, 2006. Time is set-aside on January 24, 2007, for the presentation of oral public comments at the expert panel meeting. Seven minutes will be available for each speaker (one speaker per organization). When registering to comment orally, please provide your name, affiliation, mailing address, telephone and facsimile numbers, e-mail and sponsoring organization (if any). If possible, send a copy of the statement or talking points to Dr. Shelby by January 17. This statement will be provided to the expert panel to assist them in identifying issues for discussion and will be noted in the meeting record. Registration for presentation of oral comments will also be available at the meeting on January 24, 2007, from 7:30-8:30 a.m. Persons registering at the meeting are asked to bring 20 copies of their statement or talking points for distribution to the expert panel and for the record. Preliminary Agenda The meeting begins each day at 8:30 a.m. On January 24 and 25, it is anticipated that a lunch break will occur from noon-1 p.m. and the meeting will adjourn at 5-6 p.m. The meeting is expected to adjourn by noon on January 26; however, adjournment may occur earlier or later depending upon the time needed by the expert panel to complete its work. Anticipated agenda topics for each day are listed below. January 24, 2007 • Opening remarks. • Oral public comments (7 minutes per speaker; one representative per group). • Review of sections 1-4 of the draft expert panel report on hydroxyurea. • Discussion of Section 5.0 Summary, Conclusions, and Critical Data Needs. January 25, 2007 • Discussion of Section 5.0 Summary, Conclusions, and Critical Data Needs. • Preparation of draft summaries and conclusion statements. January 26, 2007 • Presentation, discussion of, and agreement on summaries, conclusions, and data needs. • Closing comments. Expert Panel Roster The CERHR expert panel is composed of independent scientists selected for their scientific expertise in reproductive and/or developmental toxicology and other areas of science relevant for these evaluations. Erica Liebelt, M.D. (Chair), University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL. Sophie Balk, M.D., Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY. Will Faber, PhD, Consultant, Victor, NY. Jeffrey Fisher, PhD, University of Georgia, Athens, GA. Claude Hughes, Jr., M.D., PhD, Quintiles, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC. Sophie Lanzkron, M.D., Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. Kerry Lewis, M.D., Howard University, Washington, DC. Harihara Mehendale, PhD, University of Louisiana, Monroe, LA. Marvin Meistrich, PhD, University of Texas, Houston, TX. John Rogers, PhD, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Aziza Shad, M.D., Georgetown University, Washington, DC. Richard Skalko, PhD, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN. Edward Stanek III, PhD, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA. Background Information on the CERHR The NTP established the NTP CERHR in June 1998 [ **Federal Register** , December 14, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 239, page 68782)]. The CERHR is a publicly accessible resource for information about adverse reproductive and/or developmental health effects associated with exposure to environmental and/or occupational exposures. Expert panels conduct scientific evaluations of agents selected by the CERHR in public forums. The CERHR invites the nomination of agents for review or scientists for its expert registry. Information about CERHR and the nomination process can be obtained from its homepage ( *http://cerhr.niehs.nih.gov* ) or by contacting Dr. Shelby (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT above). The CERHR selects chemicals for evaluation based upon several factors including production volume, potential for human exposure from use and occurrence in the environment, extent of public concern, and extent of data from reproductive and developmental toxicity studies. CERHR follows a formal, multi-step process for review and evaluation of selected chemicals. The formal evaluation process was published in the **Federal Register** on July 16, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 136, pages 37047-37048) and is available on the CERHR Web site under “About CERHR” or in printed copy from the CERHR. Dated: October 5, 2006. Samuel H. Wilson, Deputy Director, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and National Toxicology Program. [FR Doc. E6-17137 Filed 10-13-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4140-01-P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health National Toxicology Program (NTP), NTP Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods (NICEATM); Notice of Availability of the NICEATM Pre-Screen Evaluation of a Cell Proliferation Assay To Detect Estrogenic Activity: Request for Comments and Nominations of Other In Vitro Endocrine Disruptor Test Methods AGENCY: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), HHS. ACTION: Report availability and request for comments and nominations. SUMMARY: In January 2006, the Interagency Coordinating Committee on Alternative Methods (ICCVAM) received a test method nomination for the validation of a cell-based estrogen receptor
(ER)transcriptional activation
(TA)test method from CertiChem, Inc. CertiChem, Inc. submitted a background review document
(BRD)containing information on historical development of the test method, the rationale for the test method, and supporting materials. In accordance with the ICCVAM nomination process, NICEATM conducted a pre-screen evaluation of the BRD to determine the extent that it addressed ICCVAM prioritization criteria, submission guidelines, and recommendations for standardization and validation of *in vitro* endocrine disruptor test methods. NICEATM also reviewed the performance of the test method based on pre-validation data to determine if it warranted consideration for further validation. ICCVAM requests public comments on the pre-screen evaluation titled, “Pre-Screen Evaluation of the CertiChem, Inc. *In Vitro* Endocrine Disruptor Assay (Robotic MCF-7 Cell Proliferation Assay of Estrogenic Activity.)” The pre-screen evaluation is available with supporting documents at ( *http://iccvam.niehs.nih.gov/methods/endocrine.htm* ). ICCVAM also invites public comments on whether this test method should be considered for additional validation studies. In addition, ICCVAM again invites the nomination of other *in vitro* ER and androgen receptor
(AR)binding and TA test methods for which there are standardized test method protocols, pre-validation data, and proposed validation study designs. DATES: Comments and nominations should be received by November 30, 2006. ADDRESSES: Correspondence should be sent by mail, fax, or e-mail to Dr. William S. Stokes, NICEATM Director, NIEHS, P.O. Box 12233, MD EC-17, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, (phone) 919-541-2384,
(fax)919-541-0947, (e-mail) *niceatm@niehs.nih.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background In May 2003, ICCVAM published the report, “ICCVAM Evaluation of *In Vitro* Test Methods for Detecting Potential Endocrine Disruptors: Estrogen Receptor and Androgen Receptor Binding and Transcriptional Activation Assays (NIH Publication No. 03-4503; available: *http://iccvam.niehs.nih.gov/methods/endocrine.htm* ). The report recommends minimum procedural standards that should be incorporated in standardized test method protocols and minimum lists of chemicals that should be used for validation studies. A request was made for nominations of validation studies for *in vitro* ER and AR binding and TA test methods based on these recommendations and for which there are standardized test method protocols, pre-validation data, and proposed validation study designs (69 FR 21564). ICCVAM subsequently received a nomination from CertiChem, Inc. for the validation of a cell-based ER TA method that evaluates the estrogenic activity of substances by measuring whether and to what extent a substance induces cell proliferation via ER-dependent pathways. In support of this nomination, ICCVAM received a BRD containing information on the test method's historical development, its rationale, its protocol, and other supporting materials. In accordance with the ICCVAM nomination process, NICEATM conducted a pre-screen evaluation of the BRD to determine the extent that it addressed ICCVAM prioritization criteria, submission guidelines, and recommendations for standardization and validation of *in vitro* endocrine disruptor test methods. NICEATM also reviewed the performance of the proposed test method based on pre-validation data to determine if it warranted consideration for further validation. The BRD was reviewed for completeness and to identify aspects or omissions that could impede further review. The criteria considered in evaluating information provided in the BRD are: • The extent to which the BRD addresses ICCVAM prioritization criteria. • The extent to which the BRD provides the information requested in the *ICCVAM Guidelines for the Nomination and Submission of New, Revised, and Alternative Test Methods* (NIH Pub. No. 03-4508, available at *http://iccvam.niehs.nih.gov* ). • The extent to which the proposed test method adheres to the recommendations of the *ICCVAM Evaluation of In Vitro Test Methods for Detecting Potential Endocrine Disruptors* (NIH Pub. No. 03-4503, available at *http://iccvam.niehs.nih.gov/methods/endocrine.htm* ), especially those regarding essential test method components and recommended validation substances. • The extent to which the proposed test method shows adequate performance (reliability and accuracy) during pre-validation to warrant consideration for validation studies. Based on the pre-screen evaluation, ICCVAM made a draft recommendation that this test method be considered as a high priority for validation studies to evaluate its usefulness and limitations for detecting substances with *in vitro* estrogenic agonist and antagonist activity, and that standardization of an anti-estrogenic protocol be developed prior to starting the main validation effort. ICCVAM will finalize its recommendations on the priority for future validation of this test method after considering comments received from the public and the Scientific Advisory Committee on Alternative Toxicological Methods (SACATM) at their November 30, 2006 meeting. ICCVAM also takes this opportunity to again invite the nomination of other *in vitro* ER and AR binding and TA test methods for which there are standardized test method protocols, pre-validation data, and proposed validation study designs (see also 69 FR 21564). When submitting written comments and nominations please refer to this **Federal Register** notice and include appropriate contact information (name, affiliation, mailing address, phone, fax, e-mail and sponsoring organization, if applicable). All comments received by the deadline listed above will be placed on the ICCVAM/NICEATM Web site and made available to ICCVAM. In addition, there will be an opportunity for oral public comments on the draft ICCVAM pre-screen evaluation during a meeting of the SACATM scheduled for November 30, 2006. Details of the SACATM meeting are published as a separate **Federal Register** notice (see *http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/go/frn* for the **Federal Register** notice citation). Background Information on ICCVAM and NICEATM ICCVAM is an interagency committee composed of representatives from 15 Federal regulatory and research agencies that use or generate toxicological information. ICCVAM conducts technical evaluations of new, revised, and alternative methods with regulatory applicability and promotes the scientific validation and regulatory acceptance of toxicological test methods that more accurately assess the safety and hazards of chemicals and products and that refine, reduce, or replace animal use. The ICCVAM Authorization Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 285) established ICCVAM as a permanent interagency committee of the NIEHS under the NICEATM. NICEATM administers the ICCVAM and provides scientific and operational support for ICCVAM-related activities. NICEATM and ICCVAM work collaboratively to evaluate new and improved test methods applicable to the needs of Federal agencies. Additional information about ICCVAM and NICEATM can be found at the following Web site: *http://iccvam.niehs.nih.gov.* Dated: October 5, 2006. Samuel H. Wilson, Deputy Director, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and National Toxicology Program. [FR Doc. E6-17134 Filed 10-13-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4140-01-P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Transportation Security Administration New Agency Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review: National Explosives Detection Canine Team Program (NEDCTP), Training Course Feedback Forms AGENCY: Transportation Security Administration, DHS. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: This notice announces that the Transportation Security Administration
(TSA)has forwarded the new Information Collection Request
(ICR)abstracted below to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB)for review and approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act. The ICR describes the nature of the information collection and its expected burden. TSA published a **Federal Register** notice, with a 60-day comment period soliciting comments, of the following collection of information on August 9, 2006, 71 FR 45573. DATES: Send your comments by November 15, 2006. A comment to OMB is most effective if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on the proposed information collection to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget. Comments should be addressed to Nathan Lesser, Desk Officer, Department of Homeland Security/TSA, and sent via electronic mail to *oira_submission@omb.eop.gov* or faxed to
(202)395-6974. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katrina Kletzly, Attorney-Advisor, Office of the Chief Counsel, TSA-2, Transportation Security Administration, 601 South 12th Street, Arlington, VA 22202-4220; telephone
(571)227-1995; facsimile
(571)227-1381. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments Invited In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.* ), an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. Therefore, in preparation for OMB review and approval of the following information collection, TSA is soliciting comments to—
(1)Evaluate whether the proposed information requirement is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility;
(2)Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden;
(3)Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(4)Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including using appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Information Collection Requirement *Title:* National Explosives Detection Canine Team Program (NEDCTP), Training Course Feedback Forms. *Type of Request:* New collection. *OMB Control Number:* Not yet assigned. *Form(s):* Training Course Feedback Forms. *Affected Public:* Canine course participants. *Abstract:* The National Explosives Detection Canine Team Program (NEDCTP) is a component of TSA's Office of Law Enforcement/Federal Air Marshal Service and is a cooperative partnership with participating airports and mass transit systems. TSA provides and trains the canines, and provides in-depth training for the handlers. TSA also partially reimburses the participating agency for costs associated with the teams, such as salaries, overtime, canine food, and veterinary care. Following training, TSA requests that handlers and supervisors complete TSA's Training Course Feedback Form. TSA will use the feedback results to continuously evaluate the quality of training, improve the course curriculum and course of instruction, as well as obtain new ideas, best practices, and insight on the overall canine training program. *Number of Respondents:* 150. *Estimated Annual Burden Hours:* An estimated 150 hours annually. Issued in Arlington, Virginia, on October 10, 2006. Lisa S. Dean, Privacy Officer. [FR Doc. E6-17132 Filed 10-13-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110-05-P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Geological Survey Bird Banding Laboratory Advisory Committee AGENCY: U.S. Geological Survey. ACTION: Notice of meeting. SUMMARY: The next meeting of the Advisory Committee on the Bird Banding Laboratory (Committee) will take place November 7 and 8, 2006, at the Red Lion Hotel, 3500 NE Cornell Road, Hillsboro, Oregon 97124. The meeting runs from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. each day. The purpose of the Advisory Committee, which is co-chaired by the USGS and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, is to represent the interests of the bird banding community, including both game and non-game birds, in advising the U.S. Department of the Interior and the USGS on current and future management of the Bird Banding Laboratory (BBL). The agenda for this meeting will focus on finalizing the draft report, including numerous recommendations for improving the BBL's business operations and its level of customer service, begun with the Committee's first meeting in November, 2005. The meeting is open to all members of the interested public, and time on the agenda has been reserved at the conclusion of each day's work for the Committee to receive verbal comments (limited to 5 minutes per person) from the public. To speak before the Committee, please register in advance with Mr. Daniel James (see contact information below), the USGS Designated Federal Official
(DFO)for the Committee). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel L. James, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, MS 301, Reston, Virginia 20192; 703-648-4253, e-mail: *dan_james@usgs.gov* . Dated: October 10, 2006. Susan D. Haseltine, Associate Director for Biology. [FR Doc. 06-8668 Filed 10-13-06; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 2
Traces to 2 documents
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Announcement of a meeting and request for public comment
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.