Notices. Revised schedule for the subject investigations

8,523 words·~39 min read·/register/2006/07/17/06-6301

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4310-05-M INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 731-TA-471 and 472 (Second Review)] Silicon Metal From Brazil and China AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Revised schedule for the subject investigations. DATES: *Effective Date:* July 11, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Taylor (202-708-4101), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810.

Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server ( *http://www.usitc.gov* ). The public record for these investigations may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket

(EDIS)at *http://edis.usitc.gov* . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 2, 2006, the Commission established a schedule for the conduct of the final phase of the subject investigations (71 FR 26783, May 8, 2006). Subsequently, the Commission found it necessary to revise the schedule. The Commission's new schedule for the investigations is as follows: requests to appear at the hearing must be filed with the Secretary to the Commission not later than September 12, 2006; the prehearing conference will be held at the U.S. International Trade Commission Building at 9:30 a.m. on September 15, 2006; the prehearing staff report will be placed in the nonpublic record on August 30, 2006; the deadline for filing prehearing briefs is September 12, 2006; the hearing will be held at the U.S. International Trade Commission Building at 9:30 a.m. on September 19, 2006; the deadline for filing posthearing briefs is October 6, 2006; the Commission will make its final release of information on October 31, 2006; and final party comments are due on November 2, 2006. For further information concerning these investigations see the Commission's notice cited above and the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A and C (19 CFR part 207). Authority: These investigations are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.21 of the Commission's rules. Issued: July 12, 2006. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E6-11273 Filed 7-14-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020-02-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of the Secretary Submission for OMB Review: Comment Request July 11, 2006. The Department of Labor

(DOL)has submitted the following public information collection requests

(ICR)to the Office of Management and Budget

(OMB)for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35). A copy of each ICR, with applicable supporting documentation, may be obtained by contacting Darrin King on 202-693-4129 (this is not a toll-free number) or e-mail: *king.darrin@dol.gov.* Comments should be sent to Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503, 202-395-7316 (this is not a toll-free number), within 30 days from the date of this publication in the **Federal Register** . The OMB is particularly interested in comments which: • Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; • Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; • Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and • Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. *Agency:* Bureau of Labor Statistics. *Type of Review:* Extension of a currently approved collection. *Title:* General Inquiries to State Agency Contacts. *OMB Number:* 1220-0168. *Type of Response:* Reporting. *Affected Public:* State, Local, or Tribal Government. *Frequency:* As needed. *Number of Respondents:* 55. *Total Annual Responses:* 23,890. *Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:* 15,762. *Estimate Average Response Time:* 40 minutes. *Total Annualized capital/startup costs:* $0. *Total Annual Costs (operating/maintaining systems or purchasing services):* $0. *Description:* The Bureau of Labor Statistics

(BLS)awards funds to State Agencies in order to assist them in operating one or more of seven Labor Market Information and/or Occupational Safety and Health Statistics Federal/State cooperative statistical programs. To ensure a timely flow of data and to be able to evaluate and improve the programs it is necessary to conduct ongoing communications between BLS and its State partners dealing with, for example, deliverables, program enhancements, and administrative issues. *Agency:* Bureau of Labor Statistics. *Type of Review:* Extension of a currently approved collection. *Title:* BLS Occupational Safety and Health Statistics

(OSHS)Cooperative Agreement

(CA)Application Package. *OMB Number:* 1220-0149. *Type of Response:* Reporting and Recordkeeping. *Affected Public:* State, Local, or Tribal Government. *Frequency:* Quarterly and Annually. *Number of Respondents:* 56. *Total Annual Responses:* 280. *Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:* 336. *Estimate Average Response Time:* 3 hours. *Total Annualized capital/startup costs:* $0. *Total Annual Costs (operating/maintaining systems or purchasing services):* $0. *Description:* The BLS signs cooperative agreements with states, and political subdivisions thereof, to assist them in developing and administering programs that deal with occupational safety and health statistics and to arrange through these agreements for the research to further the objectives of the Occupational Safety and Health Act. The OSHS CA application package is representative of the package sent every year to State agencies and is, therefore, considered a “generic” package. The work statements are not the actual work statements that the applicants will see in subsequent fiscal years. Substantive changes to the work statements will be reviewed separately by OMB annually. Darrin A. King, Acting Departmental Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. E6-11213 Filed 7-14-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-24-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-58,369] Agere Systems, Inc.; Including an On-Site Leased Employee of Microtronic, Inc.; Orlando, FL; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on December 19, 2005, applicable to workers of Agere Systems, Inc, Orlando, Florida. The notice was published in the **Federal Register** on January 10, 2006 (71 FR 1556). The certification was amended on April 19, 2006 to extend eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance to the workers of the subject firm. The notice was published in the **Federal Register** on April 28, 2006 (71 FR 25240). At the request of a company official, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers were engaged in the production of integrated circuits. New information shows that a leased worker of Microtronic, Inc. was employed on-site at the Orlando, Florida location of Agere Systems, Inc. Based on these findings, the Department is amending this certification to include a leased worker of Microtronic, Inc., working on-site at Agere Systems, Inc., Orlando, Florida. The intent of the Department's certification is to include all workers employed at Agere Systems, Inc., Orlando, Florida who was adversely affected by increased customer imports. The amended notice applicable to TA-W-58,341 is hereby issued as follows: All workers of Agere Systems, Inc., including an on-site leased worker of Microtronic, Inc., Orlando, Florida, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after November 3, 2004, through December 19, 2007, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974. Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of July 2006. Richard Church, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E6-11221 Filed 7-14-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-58,704] Brunswick Bowling & Billiards Corp.; a Subsidiary of Brunswick Corporation Including On-Site Leased Workers of Staffing Alliance, Time Services, Manpower and Robert Half Management Resources; Muskegon, MI; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on February 6, 2006, applicable to workers of Brunswick Bowling & Billiards Corp., a subsidiary of Brunswick Corporation, including leased workers of Staffing Alliance, Muskegon, Michigan. The notice was published in the **Federal Register** on March 2, 2006 (71 FR 10716). At the request of the petitioners, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in the production of bowling balls. New information shows that leased workers of Time Services, Manpower and Robert Half Management Resources were employed on-site at the Muskegon, Michigan location of Brunswick Bowling & Billiards Corp., a subsidiary of Brunswick Corporation. Based on these findings, the Department is amending this certification to include leased workers of Time Services, Manpower and Robert Half Management Resources working on-site at Brunswick Bowling & Billiards Corp., a subsidiary of Brunswick Corporation, Muskegon, Michigan. The intent of the Department's certification is to include all workers employed at Brunswick Bowling & Billiards Corp., a subsidiary of Brunswick Corporation, Muskegon, Michigan who was adversely affected by a shift in production to Mexico. The amended notice applicable to TA-W-58,704 is hereby issued as follows: All workers of Brunswick Bowling & Billiards Corp., a subsidiary of Brunswick Corporation, including on-site leased workers of Staffing Alliance, Time Services, Manpower and Robert Half Management Resources, Muskegon, Michigan, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after January 23, 2005, through February 6, 2008, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974. Signed at Washington, DC, this 28th day of June, 2006. Richard Church, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E6-11217 Filed 7-14-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-58,625] Cadence Innovation; Formerly Known as New Venture Industries and Experience Management; Holly Road Facility; Grand Blanc, MI; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2813), the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on February 23, 2006, applicable to workers of Cadence Innovation, formerly known as New Ventures Industries and Experience Management, Holly Road Facility, Grand Blanc, Michigan. The notice was published in the **Federal Register** on March 22, 2006 (71 FR 14549). At the request of petitioners, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers produce program rocker panels (automotive trim). The Department inadvertently limited the certification to workers engaged in employment related to the production of program rocker panels. Since the workers are not separately identifiable by product, the Department intended to include all workers of the firm. Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to correct. The amended notice applicable to TA-W-58,625 is hereby issued as follows: All workers of Cadence Innovation, formerly known as New Ventures Industries and Experience Management, Holly Road Facility, Grand Blanc, Michigan, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after January 11, 2005 through February 23, 2008, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974. Signed at Washington, DC, this 6th day of July 2006. Linda G. Poole, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E6-11220 Filed 7-14-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-58,637] Carolina Mills, Inc.; Plant No. 9; Valdese, NC; Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration By letter dated March 28, 2006, a company official requested administrative reconsideration regarding the Department's Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, applicable to workers of the subject firm. The Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration was issued on April 21, 2006, and was published in the **Federal Register** on May 5, 2006 (71 FR 26565). During the reconsideration investigation, the Department confirmed that the subject firm was a supplier to a company certified for Trade Adjustment Assistance and that the loss of the business by that company contributed importantly to the workers' separations at the subject firm. This customer was one of the subject firm's major declining customers and was certified based on a shift of production to Honduras. In accordance with Section 246 the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor herein presents the results of its investigation regarding certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

(TAA)for the subject workers. The workers produced paper patterns and sample garments at the subject facility and are not separately identifiable by product line. The investigation revealed that worker separations at the subject facility were attributable to neither increased in imports of paper patterns and sample garments nor a shift of production abroad of paper patterns and sample garments, but to improved pattern production technology (use of computer design programs has reduced the need for manual pattern making and subsequent sample making). AR 16. The Notice of determination was published in the **Federal Register** on June 19, 2003 (68 FR 36846). AR 22 On August 19, 2003, a Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration was issued in response to the July 2, 2003 request for reconsideration on the findings of neither error nor misunderstanding of the law or facts in the investigation. AR 31. The Notice was published in the **Federal Register** on September 30, 2003 (68 FR 56327). AR 32 On July 6, 2005, the Department issued a Notice of Negative Determination on Remand. The determination stated that the workers' separations were due to the subject firm's institution of production improvement measures which resulted in the reduced need for manual labor in general. SAR 15. The Notice was published in the **Federal Register** on July 14, 2005 (70 FR 40737). SSAR 1 The purpose of the second remand is to address causation, whether the subject workers could be divided into distinct subgroups, and whether the subject workers are eligible to apply for TAA. Because 29 CFR 90.2 defines a “group” as three or more workers in a firm or an appropriate subdivision and “appropriate subdivision” as an establishment in a multi-establishment firm or a distinct section of an establishment, which produces the domestic article(s) in question, the Department determines that workers could be divided into distinct subgroups if multiple articles are produced by the subject firm or an appropriate subdivision and the workers are separately identifiable by the article produced. The regulations explicitly allow the Department to examine different segments of workers when deciding whether an application should be certified. 29 CFR 90.16(g). The Department is not limited to the unit described in the application. 29 CFR 90.16(d)(1). In the case hand, the subject workers produce two distinct articles, handmade patterns and hand-sewn samples, AR 2, 14, 26, 29 and SAR 10, 14-15, and the workers producing handmade patterns have skills which are distinguishable from those producing hand-sewn samples. AR 26, SAR 10, SSAR 17, 25-31, 33-34. Further, the subject firm identifies the Plaintiff as the Director of Pattern Services, SSAR 17, and the Plaintiff identifies himself as a patternmaker. AR 26, SSAR 13, 25-31. As such, the Department determines that the subject workers are, in fact, two distinct subgroups: Pattern makers and sample makers. To determine whether a worker group is eligible to apply for TAA, the Department must ascertain whether the criteria set forth in 29 CFR 90.16(b) was met:

(1)A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm (or appropriate subdivision of the firm) have become, or are threatened to become, totally or partially separated;

(2)Sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision have decreased absolutely; and

(3)Increases (absolute or relative) of imports of articles produced by such workers' firm or an appropriate subdivision thereof contributed importantly to such total or partial separation, or threat thereof, and to such decline in sales or production. 29 CFR 90.2 states that “significant number or proportion of the workers” means at least three workers in a firm (or appropriate subdivision) with a work force of fewer than 50 workers. Should the USCIT accept the Department's determination that there are two distinct worker groups in the case at hand, the Department presents its analysis regarding the pattern makers' and sample makers' applications for TAA certification. Although the respective workers groups of pattern makers and sample makers each qualify as a “group” (three or more workers producing an article) independently, each worker group fails to satisfy 29 CFR 90.16(b)(1) because only two of each group were separated. AR 26 and SSAR 16-17. Should the USCIT reject the Department's determination that there are two distinct worker groups, the Department presents its analysis regarding the TAA petition filed on behalf of the worker group consisting of pattern makers and sample makers. While this larger group consisting of pattern makers and sample makers meets 29 CFR 90.16(b)

(1)and (2), SSAR 4, 8, 13, criterion three has not been met. 29 CFR 90.2 states that “increased imports” means imports have increased, absolutely or relative to domestic production, compared to a representative base period. The regulation also establishes the representative base period as the one-year period preceding the date twelve months prior to the petition date. Because the petition date of TA-W-51,750 is May 5, 2003, the relevant period is May 5, 2002 through May 5, 2003 and the representative base period is May 5, 2001 through May 5, 2002. Therefore, increased imports is established if import levels during May 5, 2002 through May 5, 2003 are greater than import levels during May 5, 2001 through May 5, 2002. While the Plaintiff has provided evidence of increased competition from China, SSAR 25-28, and the declining role of manual pattern makers in America, SSAR 29-31, the material falls outside the relevant period (2005 and 2004, respectively) and, therefore, do not bear on the case at hand. What is relevant, however, is previously-submitted material that shows that there were no increased imports of either patterns or samples during the relevant period as compared to the representative base period. SAR 10-11, 14. On voluntary remand, the USCIT ordered the Department to determine whether the TAA required that plaintiffs lost their jobs on account of a shift in production. In *Former Employees of Barry Callebaut* v. *Herman,* 177 F. Supp.2d 1304 (CIT 2001), the USCIT addressed that very issue with regard to NAFTA TAA. There, the USCIT concluded that “[t]he legislative history behind NAFTA TAA shows that the program is intended to benefit displaced workers whose separations *were caused by shifts in production* .” Id. at 1312. The USCIT added that NAFTA TAA “is not intended to benefit workers whose separations *were not caused by shifts in production* .” *Id.* The language in the TAA regarding shifts in production is almost identical to that in the NAFTA TAA, and the purpose of the statute is the same. Therefore, causation is a requirement for a shift in production case. Therefore, the Department determines that the subject workers have not met the criteria set forth in Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, and are not eligible to apply for worker adjustment assistance. Conclusion As the result of the findings of the investigation on remand, I affirm the original notice of negative determination of eligibility to apply for adjustment assistance for workers and former workers of Federated Merchandising Group, A Part of Federated Department Stores, New York, New York. Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of July 2006. Linda G. Poole, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E6-11225 Filed 7-14-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-59,078] Hexion Specialty Chemicals, Inc., FFP Division, Including On-Site Leased Workers of Express Personnel, High Point, NC; Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration By application dated May 11, 2006, a worker requested administrative reconsideration regarding the Department's Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, applicable to workers of the subject firm. The Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration was issued on May 16, 2006, and was published in the **Federal Register** on May 25, 2006 (71 FR 30200). Workers produce wood adhesives and ancillary products. In the request for reconsideration, the worker alleges that the subject firm supplied wood adhesive to customers affected by increased imports of wood furniture. During the reconsideration investigation, the Department contacted the subject firm and was informed that the adhesive produced by the subject workers is a component of wood furniture. Based on this new information, the Department conducted an investigation to determine whether the subject workers are eligible to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance

(TAA)as workers of a secondarily-affected company (supplier to a firm that employed workers who received a certification and such supply is related to the article that was the basis for such certification). As part of this investigation, the Department reviewed comprehensive information from the subject firm regarding 2004 and 2005 sales figures of wood adhesives. A careful analysis of this information and a careful search of the TAA database revealed that a significant number of the sixteen major declining customers who were TAA certified during the relevant period had ceased production. Therefore, the Department determines that the loss of the business by those customers contributed importantly to the workers' separations at the subject firm. In accordance with Section 246 the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department herein presents the results of its investigation regarding certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

(ATAA)for older workers. In order for the Department to issue a certification of eligibility to apply for ATAA, the group eligibility requirements of Section 246 of the Trade Act must be met. The Department has determined in the case at hand that the requirements of Section 246 have been met. A significant number of workers at the firm are age 50 or over and possess skills that are not easily transferable. Competitive conditions within the industry are adverse. Conclusion After careful review of the information obtained in the reconsideration investigation, I determine that workers of the subject firm qualify as adversely affected secondary workers under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. In accordance with the provisions of the Act, I make the following certification: All workers of Hexion Specialty Chemicals, Inc., FFP Division, High Point, North Carolina, including leased workers of Express Personnel working on site, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after March 22, 2005 through two years from the date of this certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974. Signed in Washington, DC this 6th day of July 2006. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E6-11222 Filed 7-14-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Investigations Regarding Certifications of Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (“the Act”) and are identified in the Appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to Section 221(a) of the Act. The purpose of each of the investigations is to determine whether the workers are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title II, Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations will further relate, as appropriate, to the determination of the date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved. The petitioners or any other persons showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigations may request a public hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than July 27, 2006. Interested persons are invited to submit written comments regarding the subject matter of the investigations to the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than July 27, 2006. The petitions filed in this case are available for inspection at the Office of the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room C-5311, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of July 2006. Erica R. Cantor, Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. Appendix [TAA petitions instituted between 6/26/06 and 6/30/06] TA-W Subject firm (petitioners) Location Date of institution Date of petition 59621 Irving Tissue Inc

(Comp)Fort Edward, NY 06/26/06 06/23/06 59622 Gyrus ACMI Corporation

(Comp)Racine, WI 06/26/06 06/22/06 59623 Hexcel (State) Livermore, CA 06/26/06 06/14/06 59624 Pintex Cutting Company

(Comp)Greenville, SC 06/26/06 06/08/06 59625 P.W. Minor and Son Inc.

(Comp)Batavia, NY 06/26/06 06/14/06 59626 Tower Automotive Products Co. Inc. (Union) Milan, TN 06/26/06 06/12/06 59627 Liebert Corporation

(UAW)Irvine, CA 06/26/06 06/20/06 59628 New Venture Industries

(UAW)Grand Blanc, MI 06/26/06 06/19/06 59629 IPC Print Services

(Wkrs)Saint Joseph, MI 06/26/06 06/13/06 59630 Johnson Controls Inc.

(UAW)Oklahoma City, OK 06/26/06 06/13/06 59631 Moosehead Manufacturing Co. (State) Monson & Dover Foxcroft, ME 06/26/06 06/26/06 59632 Light Master Systems Inc.

(Wkrs)Cupertino, CA 06/26/06 06/07/06 59633 Dancin Cowboy, Inc. (State) Gonzales, TX 06/26/06 06/22/06 59634 Hi-Lite Industries Inc.

(Wkrs)Greensburg, PA 06/27/06 06/26/06 59635 Minnesota Rubber

(USW)Mason City, IA 06/27/06 06/23/06 59636 Larose Inc.

(Comp)New York, NY 06/27/06 06/20/06 59637 Lenovo USA

(Wkrs)Research Triangle Park, NC 06/27/06 06/26/06 59638 Schweitzer-Mauduit International Inc.

(Comp)Lee, MA 06/27/06 06/26/06 59639 Solectron, USA

(Wkrs)Charlotte, NC 06/28/06 06/07/06 59640 Armstrong World Industies Inc.

(Wkrs)Lancaster, PA 06/28/06 06/27/06 59641 Arizona Textiles (State) Phoenix, AZ 06/28/06 06/27/06 59642 Fontaine International Inc.

(Wkrs)Calera, AL 06/28/06 06/23/06 59643 Graham Packaging

(Wkrs)Cincinnati, OH 06/28/06 06/27/06 59644 Quebecor World Kingsport (Union) Kintsport, TN 06/28/06 06/24/06 59645 Metal Ware Corporation (IAMAW) Two Rivers, WI 06/28/06 06/20/06 59646 Aircast

(Comp)Summit, NJ 06/29/06 06/24/06 59647 Rad Technologies (State) Sun Valley, CA 06/29/06 06/28/06 59648 Adecco

(Wkrs)Ft. Madison, IA 06/29/06 06/27/06 59649 Rowe Furniture, Inc.

(Wkrs)Elliston, VA 06/29/06 06/28/06 59650 Pendleton Woolen Mills Inc.

(Comp)Bellevue, NE 06/29/06 06/27/06 59651 Superior Industries Int'l. Inc. (State) Fayetteville, AR 06/29/06 06/28/06 59652 Stanton International (State) Phoenix, AZ 06/29/06 06/28/06 59653 Utility Craft Inc.

(Comp)High Point, NC 06/29/06 06/22/06 59654 House of Perfection Inc.

(Wkrs)West Columbia, SC 06/29/06 06/23/06 59655 Boeing Company

(UAW)Long Beach, CA 06/30/06 06/20/06 59656 Nautilus Inc. (State) Tyler, TX 06/30/06 06/29/06 59657 IH Services

(Wkrs)Greenville, SC 06/30/06 06/29/06 59658 Sanmina—SCI

(Wkrs)Durham, NC 06/30/06 06/24/06 59659 Jideco of Bardstown, Inc.

(Comp)Bardstown, KY 06/30/06 06/09/06 [FR Doc. E6-11215 Filed 7-14-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers (TA-W) number and alternative trade adjustment assistance

(ATAA)by (TA-W) number issued during the period of June 2006. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision have decreased absolutely; and C. Increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. There has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or subdivision; and C. One of the following must be satisfied: 1. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United States; 2. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act; or 3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are or were produced by such firm or subdivision. Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made for secondarily affected workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met.

(1)Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers' firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated;

(2)The workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related to the article that was the basis for such certification; and

(3)Either—

(A)The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph

(2)accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or

(B)A loss or business by the workers' firm with the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph

(2)contributed importantly to the workers' separation or threat of separation. In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issued a certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

(ATAA)for older workers, the group eligibility requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met. 1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are 50 years of age or older. 2. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are not easily transferable. 3. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry ( *i.e.* , conditions within the industry are adverse). Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met. *TA-W-59,457; James and Sons Neckwear, Inc., Sewell, NJ: May 16, 2005* The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the Trade Act have been met. *TA-W-59,493; Titan Plastics Group, Tech Center, Portage, MI:* November 6, 2005 The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met. *TA-W-59,551; Advanced Casting, Inc., On-Site Temp Depot, Central Falls, RI: June 1, 2005* *TA-W-59,431; Mag, Inc., Martinsville, IN: May 18, 2005* *TA-W-59,369; 3M Precision Optics, Cincinnati, OH: May 13, 2005* The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act have been met. *None.* Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. *TA-W-59,522; InBev USA, dba Latrobe Brewing Co., Latrobe, PA: June 5, 2005* *TA-W-59,402; McArthur Processional, Inc., Professional Towel Mills Division, Abbeville, SC: May 15, 2005* *TA-W-59,335; Smead Manufacturing Co., Logan Plant Division, Logan, OH: December 23, 2005* *TA-W-59,282; Lyon Workspace Products, Div. of L&D Group, Montgomery, IL: April 5, 2005* *TA-W-59,557; GFP Strandwood Corp., Hancock, MI: June 12, 2005* *TA-W-59,524; Chardon Rubber Company (The), Alliance, OH: June 2, 2005* *TA-W-59,507; Tower Automotive Michigan, LLC, Greenville Business Unit Division, Greenville, MI: May 22, 2005* *TA-W-59,478; Maytag International, Subsidiary of Whirlpool Corporation, Schaumburg, IL: May 25, 2005* *TA-W-59,428; A.W. Bohanan Company, Dallas, NC: May 17, 2005* *TA-W-59,381; Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corp., Metallurg, Inc., Newfield, NJ: May 11, 2005* *TA-W-59,337; Carolina Mills Inc, Plant #1, Maiden, NC: May 4, 2005* *TA-W-59,274; Memphis Hardwood Flooring, Memphis, TN: April 24, 2005* *TA-W-59,260; Capital City Press, Inc., Printing Division, Berlin, VT: April 14, 2005* *TA-W-58,985; Bristol Compressors, A Subsidiary of York International, A Johnson Controls Co., Bristol, VA: March 2, 2005* *TA-W-58,969; PPLLC Corporation, A Subsidiary of Panel Products, LLC, White City, OR: March 6, 2005* The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. *TA-W-59,595; Comor, Inc., On-Site Leased Workers of M-Ploy, Cochranton, PA: June 19, 2005* *TA-W-59,574; Kentucky Derby Hosiery Co., Plant #1 Division, Hickory, NC: June 12, 2005* *TA-W-59,572; GFSI, dba Gear for Sports, Bedford, IA: June 14, 2005* *TA-W-59,567; General Electric Dothan Motor Plant, Consumer and Industrial Division, Dothan, AL: June 13, 2005* *TA-W-59,563; Distinctive Designs Furniture USA, Sewing Department, Granite Falls, NC: June 12, 2005* *TA-W-59,537A; Maxtor Corporation, MMTechnology Div., Fremont, CA: June 8, 2005* *TA-W-59,537; Maxtor Corporation, MMTechnology Div., San Jose, CA: June 8, 2005* *TA-W-59,514; Bob Barker Co. Inc., Fuquay-Varina, NC: June 1, 2005* *TA-W-59,493; Titan Plastics Group, Tech Center, Portage, MI: November 6, 2005* *TA-W-59,476; Paxar Americas, Inc., A Subsidiary of Paxar Corp., Rock Hill, SC: May 26, 2005* *TA-W-59,550; FMC Technologies, Inc., Energy Processing Division, Homer City, PA: May 22, 2005* The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. *TA-W-59,551; Advanced Casting, Inc., on-site Temp Depot, Central Falls, RI: June 1, 2005* *TA-W-59,543C; Georgia-Pacific Corp., Fort James Operating Co., Wood & Fiber Supply Div., Houlton, ME: June 9, 2005* *TA-W-59,543B; Georgia-Pacific Corp., Fort James Operating Co., Wood & Fiber Supply Div., Milford, ME: June 9, 2005* *TA-W-59,543A; Georgia-Pacific Corp., Fort James Operating Co., Wood & Fiber Supply Div., Milo, ME: June 9, 2005* *TA-W-59,543; Georgia-Pacific Corp., Fort James Operating Co., Wood & Fiber Supply Div., Portage, ME: June 9, 2005* *TA-W-59,519; Pixley Richards Inc., Wyoming, MI: June 6, 2005* *TA-W-59,410; Ameritex Yarn LLC, Burlington, NC: May 7, 2005* *TA-W-59,336; Carolina Mills, Inc, Plant 12, Statesville, NC: May 4, 2005* *TA-W-59,330; Carolina Mills, Inc., Plant No. 6, Lincolnton, NC: May 4, 2005* The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. *None.* Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, it has been determined that the requirements of 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for the reasons specified. The Department as determined that criterion

(1)of Section 246 has not been met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of age or older. *TA-W-59,551; Advanced Casting, Inc., on-site Temp Depot, Central Falls, RI* *TA-W-59,457; James and Sons Neckwear, Inc., Sewell, NJ* The Department as determined that criterion

(2)of Section 246 has not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily transferable. *TA-W-59,431; Mag, Inc., Martinsville, IN* *TA-W-59,369; 3M Precision Optics, Cincinnati, OH* *TA-W-59,493; Titan Plastics Group, Tech Center, Portage, MI: November 6, 2005* The Department as determined that criterion

(3)of Section 246 has not been met. Competition conditions within the workers' industry are not adverse. *None* Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified. Since the workers of the firm are denied eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA. The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.) (employment decline) have not been met. *None* The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met. *TA-W-59,565; GN Hearing Care North America, Bloomington, MN* *TA-W-59,555; Michaels of Oregon, Meridian, ID* The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met. *TA-W-59,561; Jones Apparel Group Inc., Bristol Production Departments, Bristol, PA* *TA-W-59,552; Admiral Foundry, Formerly the Admiral Machine Co., Wadsworth, OH* *TA-W-59,468; Intier Automotive Seating, Warren, OH* *TA-W-59,435; Propex Fabrics, Inc., Seneca, SC* *TA-W-59,434; Royal Cord, Inc., Thomaston, GA* *TA-W-59,339; Northern Technologies Mfg. Corp., Pocahontas, AR* *TA-W-59,228; North American Communications, Duncansville, PA* The investigation revealed that the predominate cause of worker separations is unrelated to criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.C) (shift in production to a foreign country). *TA-W-59,422; Unifi, Inc., Plant #4, Reidsville, NC* *TA-W-59,307; Royal Oak Enterprises, Jacksonville, TX* The workers' firm does not produce an article as required for certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974. *TA-W-59,559; ExpressPoint Technology Services, Lincolnton, CA* *TA-W-59,556; ATA Airlines, Inc., Reservations Call Center, Indianapolis, IN* *TA-W-59,539; Safeco Insurance, IT Department, Seattle, WA* *TA-W-59,536; Tokui, Inc., Coldwater, MI* *TA-W-59,503; Bank of America, Consumer Systems and Support Technology Division, Utica, NY* *TA-W-59,501; Firemen's Fund Insurance Company, Allianz AG, Novato, CA* *TA-W-59,488; Industrial Design Construction & Aketon Technologies, Working at Hewlett Packard, Portland, OR* *TA-W-59,408; WestPoint Stevens, Inc., Drakes Branch, VA* The investigation revealed that criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been met. The workers' firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier to or a downstream producer for a firm whose workers were certified eligible to apply for TAA. *None.* I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the month of June 2006. Copies of These determinations are available for inspection in Room C-5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 during normal business hours or will be mailed to persons who write to the above address. Dated: July 10, 2006. Richard Church, Acting Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E6-11219 Filed 7-14-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-56,428; TA-W-56,428B] Magneti Marelli Powertrain USA, LLC, Sanford, NC; Including Employees of Magneti Marelli Powertrain USA, LLC, Sanford, NC; Working On-Site at the Harley Davidson Facility, Wauwatosa, WI; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and a Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on March 4, 2005, applicable to workers of Magneti Marelli Powertrain USA, LLC, Sanford, North Carolina. The notice was published in the **Federal Register** on April 1, 2005 (70 FR 16847). At the request of a company official, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. New information shows that worker separations have occurred involving employees of the Sanford, North Carolina facility of Magneti Marelli Powertrain USA, LLC working on-site at the Harley Davidson Facility, located in Wauwatosa, Wisconsin. Mr. Daniel Kaari, Mr. Scott Metcalf and Mr. David Jones provided customer support services for the production of engine management components and systems (e.g.—throttle bodies, fuel injectors, and carburetors) at the Sanford, North Carolina location of the subject firm. Based on these findings, the Department is amending this certification to include employees of the Sanford, North Carolina facility of the subject firm working on-site at the Harley Davidson Facility located in Wauwatosa, Wisconsin. The intent of the Department's certification is to include all workers of the Sanford, North Carolina location of the subject firm who was adversely affected by increased customer imports. The amended notice applicable to TA-W-56,428 is hereby issued as follows: All workers of Magneti Marelli Powertrain USA, LLC, Sanford, North Carolina (TA-W-56,428), and Magneti Marelli Powertrain USA, LLC, Michigan Office, Farmington Hills, Michigan (TA-W-56,428A), including employees of Magneti Marelli Powertrain USA, LLC, Sanford North Carolina working on-site at the Harley Davidson Facility, Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after January 3, 2004, through March 4, 2007, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974. I further determine that all workers of Magneti Marelli Powertrain USA, LLC, Sanford, North Carolina (TA-W-58,428), and Magneti Marelli Powertrain USA, LLC, Michigan Office, Farmington Hills, Michigan (TA-W-56,428A), including employees of Magneti Marelli Powertrain USA, LLC, Sanford, North Carolina working on-site at the Harley Davidson Facility, Wauwatosa, Wisconsin (TA-W-56,428B) are denied eligibility for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974. Signed at Washington, DC this 29th day of June 2006. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E6-11224 Filed 7-14-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-59,490] Pace Industries; Georgia Warehouse; Midland, GA; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and a Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on June 16, 2006, applicable to workers of Pace Industries, Georgia Warehouse, Midland, Georgia. The notice will soon be published in the **Federal Register** . At the request of the company official, the Department reviewed the denial of eligibility for workers of the subject firm to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance. The workers are engaged in warehousing grill castings produced by Pace Industries, whose workers are certified eligible to apply for adjustment assistance. The workers of the firm's Georgia Warehouse were denied eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance because a significant number of workers were not 50 years of age or older. The company official has provided new information with respect to the number of workers over age 50. The Department has determined that this revised number of workers meets the significant number of workers requirement. Additionally, the investigation determined that the workers of the subject firm possess skills that are not easily transferable and competitive conditions in the industry are adverse. Accordingly, the Department is amending the determination to extend eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance to the workers of Pace Industries, Georgia Warehouse, Midland, Georgia. The amended notice applicable to TA-W-59,490 is hereby issued as follows: All workers of Pace Industries, Georgia Warehouse, Midland, Georgia, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after May 30, 2005 through June 16, 2008, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974. Signed in Washington, DC, this 7th day of July, 2006. Linda G. Poole, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E6-11218 Filed 7-14-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION [Notice (06-045)] Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel Meeting AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration. ACTION: Notice of meeting. SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration announces a forthcoming meeting of the Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel. DATES: Friday, August 18, 2006, 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time. ADDRESSES: 100 Spaceport Way, Cape Canaveral, Florida 32920 (Florida Space Authority). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. John D. Marinaro, Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel Executive Director, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546,

(202)358-0914. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel will hold its quarterly meeting. This discussion is pursuant to carrying out its statutory duties for which the Panel reviews, identifies, evaluates, and advises on those program activities, systems, procedures, and management activities that can contribute to program risk. Priority is given to those programs that involve the safety of human flight. The agenda will include institutional and program safety policy, procedure and administration related to Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel fact-finding events at the Kennedy Space Center (KSC). Other major subjects will likely include NASA organizational areas of interest as they relate to safety ( *e.g.* Technical Authority, NASA's response to CAIB recommendations, NASA Safety Culture, etc.). The meeting will be open to the public up to the seating capacity of the room (40). Seating will be on a first-come basis. Please contact the ASAP Office at

(202)358-0914 at least 48 hours in advance to reserve a seat. Visitors will be requested to sign a visitor's register. Photographs will only be permitted during the first 10 minutes of the meeting. During the first 30 minutes of the meeting, members of the public may make a 5-minute verbal presentation to the Panel on the subject of safety in NASA. To do so, please contact Mr. John Marinaro on

(202)358-0914 at least 24 hours in advance. Any member of the public is permitted to file a written statement with the Panel at the time of the meeting. Verbal presentations and written comments should be limited to the subject of safety in NASA. Dated: July 7, 2006. P. Diane Rausch, Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration. [FR Doc. E6-11150 Filed 7-14-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7510-13-P NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION Notice of Meeting Time and Date: 10 a.m., Thursday, July 20, 2006. Place: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-3428. Status: Open. Matters To Be Considered: 1. Request from American Eagle Federal Credit Union to Convert to a Community Charter. 2. Request from Aerospace Credit Union to Convert to a Federal Community Charter. 3. Quarterly Insurance Fund Report. 4. Reprogramming of NCUA's Operating Budget for 2006. 5. Proposed Rule: Part 703 of NCUA's Rules and Regulations, Permissible Investments for Federal Credit Unions. Final Rule: Section 701.21(c)(7) of NCUA's Rules and Regulations, Interest Rate Ceiling. 7. Interest Rate Ceiling Determination by NCUA's Board under 12 U.S.C. 1757(5). Recess: 11:15 a.m. Time and Date: 11:30 a.m., Thursday, July 20, 2006. Place: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-3428. Status: Closed. Matters To Be Considered: 1. Merger under Part 708a of NCUA's Rules and Regulations. Closed pursuant to Exemption (8). 2. Part 703 of NCUA's Rules and Regulations, Pilot Program Request. Closed pursuant to Exemption (8). 3. Administrative Action under Section 206(g) of the Federal Credit Union Act. Closed pursuant to Exemptions

(6)and (8). Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board. [FR Doc. 06-6301 Filed 7-13-06; 3:04 pm]

Connectionstraces to 2

Traces to 2 documents

U.S. Code

12 references not yet in our index

19 CFR 201
19 CFR 207
Pub. L. 104-13
26 USC 2813
19 USC 2813
29 CFR 90.2
29 CFR 90.16(g)
29 CFR 90.16(d)(1)
29 CFR 90.16(b)
29 CFR 90.16(b)(1)
177 F. Supp. 2d 1304
Pub. L. 92-463

Citation graph

cites case law

Notices

Revised schedule for the subject investigations

U.S.C.§ 2273

U.S.C.§ 1757

F. Supp.177 F. Supp. 2d 1304

Cite19 CFR 201

Cite19 CFR 207

Pub. L.Pub. L. 104-13

Cite26 USC 2813

Cites 14 · showing 7Cited by 0 across 0 sources