Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

§
Marginalia
Code · REGISTER · 2006-07-03 · Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce · Notices

Notices. Notice of opportunity to request administrative review of antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended investigation

14,354 words·~65 min read·/register/2006/07/03/06-5948

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. ACTION: Notice of opportunity to request administrative review of antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended investigation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sheila E. Forbes, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Office 4, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone:
(202)482-4697. Background Each year during the anniversary month of the publication of an antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspension of investigation, an interested party, as defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, may request, in accordance with section 351.213
(2002)of the Department of Commerce (the Department) Regulations, that the Department conduct an administrative review of that antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended investigation. *Opportunity to Request a Review:* Not later than the last day of July 2006, 1 interested parties may request administrative review of the following orders, findings, or suspended investigations, with anniversary dates in July for the following periods: 1 Or the next business day, if the deadline falls on a weekend, federal holiday or any other day when the Department is closed. Period Antidumping Duty Proceedings Brazil: Silicon Metal, A-351-806 7/1/05-6/30/06 Chile: IQF Red Raspberries, A-337-806 7/1/05-6/30/06 Finland: Purified Carboxymethylcellulose, A-405-803 12/27/04-6/30/06 France: Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils, A-427-814 7/1/05-6/30/06 Germany: Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils, A-428-825 7/1/05-6/30/06 India: Polyethylene Terephthalate
(Pet)Film, A-533-824 7/1/05-6/30/06 Iran: In-Shell Pistachio Nuts, A-507-502 7/1/05-6/30/06 Italy: Certain Pasta, A-475-818 7/1/05-6/30/06 Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils, A-475-824 7/1/05-6/30/06 Japan: Clad Steel Plate, A-588-838 7/1/05-6/30/06 Polyvinyl Alcohol, A-588-861 7/1/05-6/30/06 Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils, A-588-845 7/1/05-6/30/06 Mexico: Purified Carboxymethylcellulose, A-201-834 12/27/04-6/30/06 Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils, A-201-822 7/1/05-6/30/06 Republic of Korea: Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils, A-580-834 7/1/05-6/30/06 Russia: Ferrovanadium and Nitrided Vanadium, A-821-807 7/1/05-6/30/06 Solid Urea, A-821-801 7/1/05-6/30/06 Sweden: Purified Carboxymethylcellulose, A-401-808 12/27/04-6/30/06 Taiwan: Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils, A-583-831 7/1/05-6/30/06 Thailand: Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings, A-549-807 7/1/05-6/30/06 Canned Pineapple, A-549-813 7/1/05-6/30/06 Furfuryl Alcohol, A-549-812 7/1/05-6/30/06 The Netherlands: Purified Carboxymethylcellulose, A-421-811 12/27/04-6/30/06 The People's Republic of China: Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings, A-570-814 7/1/05-6/30/06 Persulfates, A-570-847 7/1/05-6/30/06 Saccharin, A-570-878 7/1/05-6/30/06 The United Kingdom: Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils, A-412-818 7/1/05-6/30/06 Turkey: Certain Pasta, A-489-805 7/1/05-6/30/06 Ukraine: Solid Urea, A-823-801 7/1/05-6/30/06 Countervailing Duty Proceedings India: Polyethylene Terephthalate
(Pet)Film, C-533-825 1/1/05-12/31/05 Italy: Certain Pasta, C-475-819 1/1/05-12/31/05 Turkey: Certain Pasta, C-489-806 1/1/05-12/31/05 Suspension Agreements Russia: Hot-Rolled Flat-Rolled Carbon-Quality Steel Products, A-821-809 1/1/05-12/31/05 In accordance with section 351.213(b) of the regulations, an interested party as defined by section 771(9) of the Act may request in writing that the Secretary conduct an administrative review. For both antidumping and countervailing duty reviews, the interested party must specify the individual producers or exporters covered by an antidumping finding or an antidumping or countervailing duty order or suspension agreement for which it is requesting a review, and the requesting party must state why it desires the Secretary to review those particular producers or exporters. 2 If the interested party intends for the Secretary to review sales of merchandise by an exporter (or a producer if that producer also exports merchandise from other suppliers) which were produced in more than one country of origin and each country of origin is subject to a separate order, then the interested party must state specifically, on an order-by-order basis, which exporter(s) the request is intended to cover. 2 If the review request involves a non-market economy and the parties subject to the review request do not qualify for separate rates, all other exporters of subject merchandise from the non-market economy country who do not have a separate rate will be covered by the review as part of the single entity of which the named firms are a part. As explained in *Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,* 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), the Department has clarified its practice with respect to the collection of final antidumping duties on imports of merchandise where intermediate firms are involved. The public should be aware of this clarification in determining whether to request an administrative review of merchandise subject to antidumping findings and orders. See also the Import Administration Web site at *http://ia.ita.doc.gov.* Six copies of the request should be submitted to the Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Room 1870, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230. The Department also asks parties to serve a copy of their requests to the Office of Antidumping/Countervailing Operations, Attention: Sheila Forbes, in room 3065 of the main Commerce Building. Further, in accordance with section 351.303(f)(l)(i) of the regulations, a copy of each request must be served on every party on the Department's service list. The Department will publish in the **Federal Register** a notice of “Initiation of Administrative Review of Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation” for requests received by the last day of July 2006. If the Department does not receive, by the last day of July 2006, a request for review of entries covered by an order, finding, or suspended investigation listed in this notice and for the period identified above, the Department will instruct the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to assess antidumping or countervailing duties on those entries at a rate equal to the cash deposit of (or bond for) estimated antidumping or countervailing duties required on those entries at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption and to continue to collect the cash deposit previously ordered. This notice is not required by statute but is published as a service to the international trading community. Dated: June 28, 2006. Thomas F. Futtner, Acting Office Director, AD/CVD Operations, Office 4, Import Administration. [FR Doc. E6-10380 Filed 6-30-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P [?USGPO Galley End:?][?USGPO Galley End:?] DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. ACTION: Notice of initiation of antidumping and countervailing duty administrative reviews. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (“the Department”) has received requests to conduct administrative reviews of various antidumping and countervailing duty orders and findings with May anniversary dates. In accordance with the Department's regulations, we are initiating those administrative reviews. DATES: *Effective Date:* July 3, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sheila E. Forbes, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Office 4, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone:
(202)482-4697. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The Department has received timely requests, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b), for administrative reviews of various antidumping and countervailing duty orders and findings with May anniversary dates. Initiation of Reviews In accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we are initiating administrative reviews of the following antidumping and countervailing duty orders and findings. We intend to issue the final results of these reviews not later than May 31, 2007. Period to be reviewed Antidumping Duty Proceedings Belgium: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils, A-423-808 5/1/05-4/30/06 Ugine & ALZ Belgium Canada: Certain Softwood Lumber 1 , A-122-838 5/1/05-4/30/06 465016 BC Ltd. (aka 465016 Ltd.) 582912 BC Ltd. (dba Paragon Wood Products Lumby) 582912 BC Ltd. (dba Paragon Wood-Lumby Div.) Abitibi-Consolidated Company of Canada Abitibi-Consolidated Inc. Abitibi-LP Engineered Wood II Inc. Abitibi-LP Engineered Wood Inc. AJ Forest Products Ltd. Alberta Spruce Industries, Ltd. Alexandre Cote Ltee. Allmac Lumber Sales Ltd. Allmar International Alpa Lumber Mills Inc. Alpine Forest Trading Inc. American Bayridge Corporation Anderson Pacific Forest Products Ltd. Apollo Forest Products Ltd. Aquila Cedar Products Ltd. Arbec Forest Products Inc. Arbutus Manufacturing Ltd. Armand Duhamel & Fils Inc. Aspen Planers Ltd. Atco Lumber Ltd. Atikokan Forest Products Ltd. Atlantic Warehousing Ltd. Atlas Lumber Alberta Ltd. AWL Forest Products B & L Forest Products Ltd. Bakerview Forest Products Inc. Bardeaux et Cedres St-Honore Inc. Barette-Chapais Ltee. Barrett Lumber Company (Barrett Lumber Company Limited) Barry Maedel Woods & Timber Bathurst Lumber Bathurst Lumber, Division of UPM-Kymmene Miramichi Inc. Bayside Reman Services, Ltd. Beaubois Coaticook Inc. Bel Air Forest Products Inc. Bel Air Lumber Mills, Inc. Bermorg LLC Bishop Lumber Co. Ltd. Blackville Lumber Blackville Lumber, Division of UPM Miramichi Blackville Lumber, Division of UPM-Kymmene Miramichi Inc. Blanchette et Blanchette Inc. (Blanchette & Blanchette Inc.) Bois Bonsai Inc. Bois BSL Inc. Bois Cobodex
(1995)Inc. Bois De L'est FB Inc. Bois d'oeuvre Cedrico inc. (Cedrico Lumber Inc.) Bois Fontaine Inc. Bois Granval G.D.S. Inc. Bois Kheops Inc. Bois Marsoui G.D.S. Inc. Bois Neos Inc. Bois Nor Que Wood Inc. Bois Omega Ltee. Boisaco Inc. Bonnyman & Byers Limited (Bonnyman & Byers Ltd.) Boscus Canada Inc. Boucher Bros. Lumber Ltd. Bowater Canadian Forest Products Incorporated Bowater Incorporated Bridgeside Forest Industries Ltd. (Bridgeside Higa Forest Industries, Ltd.) Brink Forest Products Ltd. Brittania Lumber Company Limited Brown & Rutherford Co. Ltd. Brunswick Valley Lumber Inc. (Brunswick Valley Lumber) Buchanan Distribution Inc. Buchanan Forest Products Ltd. Buchanan Lumber Buchanan Lumber Sales Inc. Buchanan Northern Hardwoods Inc. Burrows Lumber Inc. Burrows Lumber
(US)Inc. Busque & Laflamme Inc. BW Creative Wood Industries Ltd. Byrnexco Inc. C & C Lath Mill Ltd. C&C Wood Products Ltd. C.E. Harrison & Sons Limited (C. Ernest Harrison & Sons Ltd.) Caledonia Forest Products Ltd. Cambie Cedar Products Ltd. Canadian Forest Products Ltd. Canadian Forest Products Ltd., Uneeda Wood Products Division Canadian Lumber Company Ltd. Canadian Overseas Log & Lumber, Ltd. Canasia Forest Industries Ltd Canfor Corporation Canfor Uneeda/Uneeda Wood Products Canfor Wood Products Marketing Ltd. CanWel Building Materials Ltd. Canyon Lumber Company Ltd. Cardinal Lumber Manufacturing and Sales Inc. Careau Bois Inc. Carrier & Begin Inc. Carrier Forest Products Ltd. Carrier Lumber Ltd. Carson Lake Lumber Limited Cascadia Forest Products Ltd. Cattermole Timber CDS Lumber Products Ltd. Cedartone Specialties Ltd. Central Cedar Ltd. Centurion Lumber Manufacturing
(1983)Ltd. Chaleur Sawmills Associes (Chaleur Sawmills, Chaleur Sawmills Associates, Scierie Chaleur Associes) Chasyn Wood Technologies Inc. Cheslatta Forest Products Ltd. Chipman Sawmill Inc. Choicewood Products Inc. City Lumber Sales & Services Limited Clair Industrial Development Corp. Ltd. Claude Forget Inc. Clermond Hamel Ltee. Clotures Rustiques L.g. Inc. Coast Clear Wood Ltd. Colonial Fence MFG. Ltd. (Colonial Fence Mfg. Ltd.) Comeau Lumber Ltd. (Comeau Lumber Limited) Commonwealth Plywood Co. Ltd. (dba Bois Clo-Val, Les Entreprises Atlas, and W.C. Edwards Lumber) Cooper Creek Cedar Ltd. Cottle's Island Lumber Co. Ltd. (Cottles Island Lumber Company Limited) Coulsen Manufacturing Ltd. Cowichan Lumber Ltd. Crystal Forest Industries Ltd. Cushman Lumber Company Inc. Cushman Lumber Company Ltd. D.S. Lumber Sales Ltd. Daaquam Lumber Inc. (aka Bois Daaquam Inc.) Dakeryn Industries Ltd. Davron Forest Products Ltd. Deep Cove Forest Products Deep Cove Lumber Delco Forest Products Ltd. Delta Cedar Products Delta Pacific Lumber Sales, Inc. Deniso Lebel Inc. Devon Lumber Co. Ltd. Doman Forest Products Limited Doman Industries Limited Doman-western Lumber Ltd. Domexport, Inc. Domino Forest Products Inc. Domtar Inc. Doubletree Forest Products Company Ltd. Downie Timber Ltd. Dubreuil Forest Products Limited Dunkley Lumber Ltd. E. Stirling Wood Products Ltd. E. Tremblay et fils ltee. (aka Scierie Tremblay) Eacan Timber Canada Ltd. Eacan Timber Ltd. (Eacan Timber Limited) Eacan Timber USA Ltd. East Fraser Fiber Co., Ltd. Eastwood Forest Products Inc. Ed Bobcel Lumber 1993 Ltd. Edwin Blaikie Lumber Ltd. Elmira Wood Products Elmsdale Lumber Co., Ltd. (Elmsdale Lumber Company) ER Probyn Export Ltd. Errington Cedar Products Ltd. Excel Forest Products F W Taylor Lumber Company F.L. Bodogh Lumber Co. Ltd. Falcon Lumber Limited Faulkener Wood Specialties Ltd. Fawcett Lumber Co. Fawcett Quality Lumber Products Federated Co-operatives Limited Felix Wood Products of Canada Fenclo Ltee. Finmac Lumber Limited Fletcher Lumber Fontaine Inc. (dba J.A. Fontaine et fils Incorporee) Foothills Forest Products Inc. Forest Products Northwest, Inc. Forex Log & Lumber, Ltd. Fort St. James Forest Products Ltd. Forwest Wood Specialties Inc. Forwood Forest Products Inc. FPS Canada Inc. Fraser Pacific Forest Products Inc. Fraser Pacific Lumber Company Fraser Papers Inc. Fraser Plaster Rock Fraser Pulp Chips Ltd. Fraser Timber Limited Fraserview Cedar Products Ltd. Fraserwood Industries Ltd. G.A. Grier
(1991)Inc. (G.A. Grier 1991 Inc.) G.A.G. Sales, Inc. (G.A.G. Sales Inc.) G.D.S. Valoribois Inc. G.L. Sawmill Ltd. Galloway Lumber Co. Ltd. Gerard Crete & Fils Inc. (aka Gerard Crete & Sons Inc.) Gestion Natanis Inc. Gestion S. Crete Inc. Gestofor, Inc. Gilbert Smith Forest Products Ltd. Goldwood Industries Ltd. Goodfellow Inc. Gordon Buchanan Enterprises Ltd. Gorman Bros. Lumber Ltd. Great Lakes MSR Lumber Ltd. Great West Timber Limited Greenwood Forest Products
(1983)Ltd. Groupe Lebel
(2004)Inc. H.A. Fawcett & Son Limited H.J. Crabbe & Sons Ltd. H.S. Bartram
(1984)LTD Haida Forest Products Ltd. Hainesville Sawmill Ltd. Halo Sawmill Limited Partnership Halo Sawmills Hanson's Sawmill Harry Freeman & Son Limited (Harry Freeman and Son Limited, Harry Freeman & Son Ltd., Harry Freeman & Sons Ltd.) Hawk Brothers Lumber Co., Ltd. Hefler Forest Products Ltd. Herridge Trucking & Sawmilling Ltd. Hi-Knoll Cedar Inc. Hilmoe Forest Products Ltd. Holdright Lumber Products Limited Howe Sound Forest Products
(2005)Ltd. Hudson Mitchell & Sons Lumber Inc. Hughes Lumber Specialties Inc. Hy Mark Wood Products Inc. Hyak Specialty Wood Products Ltd. Industrie Bois Lamontagne Inc. Industries G.D.S. Inc. Industries P.F. Inc. Industries Perron Inc. International Forest Products Ltd. International Forest Products Ltd. (Interfor), MacKenzie Sezai Division Interpac Log & Lumber Ltd. Iron Mountain Trading Inc. Ivor Forest Products Ltd. J&G Log and Lumber Ltd. J&G Log Works Ltd. J.A. Turner & Sons
(1987)Limited (J.A. Turner & Sons
(1987)Ltd.) J.D. Irving, Limited J.H. Huscroft Ltd. J.S. Jones Timber Jackpine Engineered Wood Products Jackpine Forest Products Ltd. Jackpine Group of Companies Jamestown Lumber Company Limited (Jamestown Lumber Company Ltd., Jamestown Lumber Co. Ltd.) Jasco Forest Products Ltd. Jeffrey Hanson John W. Jamer Ltd. JR Remanufacturing Inc. Kalesnikoff Lumber Co. Ltd. Kebois Limited (Kebois Ltee) Kenora Forest Products Ltd. Kenwood Lumber Ltd. Kermode Forest Products Ltd. Kispiox Forest Products Ltd. Kitwanga Lumber Company Kitwanga Mills Ltd Kootenay Innovative Wood Ltd. KP Wood Ltd. Kruger, Inc. Krystal Klear Marketing Inc. L&M Lumber Ltd. La Crete Sawmills Ltd. Lafontaine Lumber Inc. Lakeland Mills Ltd. Lakeside Timber Ltd. Lamco Forest Products Landmark Truss & Lumber Inc. Langevin Forest Products, Inc. Langley Timber Ltd Lattes Waska Laths Inc. Lawsons Lumber Company Ltd. Lecours Lumber Co. Limited Ledwidge Lumber Co., Ltd. Leggett & Platt (B.C.) Ltd. Leggett & Platt Canada Co. Leggett & Platt Ltd. Leggett & Platt, Inc. LeggettWood Leonard Ellen Canada
(1991)Inc. Les Bois d'Oeuvre Beaudoin & Gauthier Les Bois Indifor Lumber Inc. Les Bois K-7 Lumber Inc. Les Bois Lac Frontiere Inc. Les Bois S&P Grondin Inc. (aka Les Bois Grondin Inc.) Les Chantiers Chibougamau Ltee Les Pallettes BB Inc. (aka B.B. Pallets Inc.) Les Placements Jean-paul Fontaine Ltee Les Produits Forestiers D.G. Ltee Les produits forestiers Dube inc. (Dube Forest Products) Les Produits Forestiers F.B.M. Inc. Les Produits Forestiers Miradas Inc. (aka Miradas Forest Products Inc.) Les Scieries du Lac St-Jean Inc. Les Scieries J. Lavoie Inc. Leslie Forest Products Ltd. Ligni Bel Ltd. Lignum Ltd. Lindal Cedar Homes Company Lindsay Lumber Ltd. Liskeard Lumber Limited Long Lake Forest Products Inc. Long Lake Forest Products Inc. (Nakina Division) Louisiana-Pacific Canada Ltd. Louisiana-Pacific Corporation Lulumco inc. LumberPlus Industries Inc. Lyle Forest Products Ltd. M & G Higgins Lumber Ltd. M.L. Wilkins & Son Ltd. (M.L. Wilkins and Son Ltd.) MacTara Limited Maedel Wood & Timber Sales (div. of T.S.P. Systems Ltd.) Maher Forest Products, Ltd. Maibec Industries Inc. (aka Industries Maibec Inc.) Mainland Sawmill Mainland Sawmill (Division of Terminal Forest Products) Manitou Forest Products Ltd. Manning Diversified Forest Products Ltd. Maple Creek Saw Mills Inc. Marcel Lauzon Inc. Marine Way Industries Inc. Marwood Ltd. Marwood Ltd.—Central Blissville Materiaux Blanchet Inc. Max Meilleur et fils ltee McKenzie Forest Products Inc. MDFP Sales MF Bernard Inc. Mid America Lumber Mid Valley Lumber Specialties Ltd. Midway Lumber Mills Ltd. Mill & Timber Products Ltd. Millar Western Forest Products Ltd. Millco Wood Products Ltd. Miramichi Lumber Products Mirax Lumber Products Ltd. Mobilier Rustique (Beauce) Inc. Monterra Lumber Mills Limited Mountain View Specialties Mountain View Specialty Products Inc. MPH Forest Products Ltd. Murray Bros. Lumber Company Limited N.F. Douglas Lumber Ltd. (N.F. Douglas Lumber Limited) Nechako Lumber Co., Ltd. Newcastle Lumber Co., Inc. Nexfor Inc. Nicholson and Cates Limited Nickel Lake Lumber Noble Custom Cut Ltd. Norbord Industries Inc. NorSask Forest Products Inc North American Forest Products Ltd. North American Forest Products Ltd. (Belanger Division) North American Hardwoods Ltd. North Atlantic Lumber Inc. North Enderby Distribution Ltd. North Enderby Timber Ltd. North Mitchell Lumber Company Ltd. North of 50 North Shore Timber Ltd. North Star Wholesale Lumber Ltd. Northern Sawmills Inc. Northland Forest Products Ltd. Northwest Specialty Lumber Olav Haavaldsrud Timber Company Limited Olympic Industries Inc. Optibois Inc. Oregon Canadian Forest Products P. Proulx Forest Products Inc. (aka Proulx, Proulx Forest Products Inc., and Produits Forestiers P. Proulx Inc.) Pacific Coast Timber Inc. Pacific Lumber Company Pacific Lumber Remanufacturing Inc. Pacific Specialty Wood Products Ltd. (Clearwood Industries Inc.) Pallan Timber Products
(2000)Ltd. Pallan Timber Products Ltd. Palliser Lumber Sales Ltd. Parallel Wood Products, Ltd. Pat Power Forest Products Corporation Patrick Lumber Company Paul Vallee Inc. Peak Forest Products Ltd. Pharlap Forest Products Inc. Phoenix Forest Products Inc. Pope & Talbot Inc. (and its wholly owned subsidiary Pope & Talbot Ltd.) Porcupine Wood Products Ltd. Port Moody Timber Ltd. Portbec Forest Products Ltd. (aka Les Produits Forestiers Portbec Ltee.) Power Wood Corp. Precibois Inc. Preparabois Inc. Produits Forestiers Berscifor Inc. Produits Forestiers La Tuque Inc. Produits Forestiers Petit-Paris Inc. Produits Forestiers Saguenay Inc. PRO-Lumber Inc. (Pro-Lumber Inc., Pro Lumber Inc.) Promobois G.D.S. Inc. Prudential Forest Products Limited Quadra Wood Products Ltd. R. Fryer Forest Products Limited Raintree Lumber Specialties Ltd. Ratcliff Forest Products Inc. Redtree Cedar Products Ltd. Redwood Value Added Products, Inc. Rembos Inc. Rene Bernard Inc. RichWood Trading Ltd. Ridge Cedar Ltd. RIDGETIMBER Trading Inc. RIDGETIMBER Trading Ltd. Ridgewood Forest Products Limited Rielly Industrial Lumber Inc. Riverside Forest Products Ltd. Riverside Marketing and Sales Rojac Cedar Products Inc. Rojac Enterprises Inc. Roland Boulanger & Cie Ltee Russell White Lumber Limited S&R Sawmills Ltd. Salmon Arm Saran Cedar Sauder Industries Limited Sauder Industries Ltd.—Cowichan Division Sawarne Lumber Co. Ltd. Scierie A&M St-Pierre Inc. Scierie Adrien Arseneault Ltee. Scierie Alexandre Lemay et fils inc. Scierie Dion et fils Inc. Scierie Duhamel Sawmill Inc. Scierie Gallichan Scierie Gauthier Ltee Scierie La Patrie, Inc. Scierie Landrienne, Inc. Scierie Lapointe & Roy Ltee Scierie Leduc, Division of Stadacona L.P. Scierie Leduc, Division of Stadaconia Inc. Scierie Norbois Inc. Scierie Nord-Sud (North-South Sawmill Inc.) Scierie St-Elzear Inc. Scierie Tech Scierie West Brome Inc. Scieries du Lac St. Jean Inc. Seed Timber Co. Ltd. Selkirk Specialty Wood Ltd. Sexton Lumber Co. Limited Seycove Forest Products Limited Seymour Creek Cedar Products Ltd. Shawood Lumber Inc. Sigurdson Bros. Logging Company Ltd. (aka Sigurdson Brothers Logging Company Ltd.) Silvermere Forest Products Inc. Sinclar Enterprises Ltd. Skagit Industries Skaha Forest Products Ltd. Skana Forest Products Ltd. Slocan Forest Products Ltd. Societe en Commandite Scierie Opitciwan Solid Wood Products Inc. South Beach Trading Inc. South-East Forest Products Ltd. Spray Lake Sawmills
(1980)Ltd. Spray Lake Sawmills Ltd. Springer Creek Forest Products Ltd. Spruce Forest Products Ltd. Spruce Products Spruceland Millworks (Alberta) Spruceland Millworks Inc. St. Anthony Lathing Ltd. Stag Timber Stuart Lake Lumber Co. Ltd. Stuart Lake Marketing Co. Ltd. Stuart Lake Marketing Corporation (aka Stuart Lake Marketing Inc.) Suncoast Lumber & Milling Suncoast Lumber & Milling (div. of 407 Holdings Ltd.) Sundance Forest Industries Ltd. Swiftwood Forest Products Limited Sylvanex Lumber Products Inc. Synergy Pacific Engineered Timber Ltd. T.F. Specialty Sawmill T.P. Downey & Sons Ltd. Taiga Building Products Taiga Forest Products Tall Tree Lumber Co. Taylor Lumber Company Ltd. (Taylor Lumber Co. Ltd., Taylor Lumber Company Limited) Teal Cedar Products Ltd. Teal-Jones Group Teal-Jones Sales Ltd. Teeda Corp Tembec Inc. Tembec Industries Inc. Terminal Forest Products (Terminal Sawmill Division) Terminal Forest Products Ltd. TFL Forest Ltd. (aka TimberWest Forest Corp. and Timber West Forest Company) The Pas Lumber Co. Ltd. The Teal Jones Group-Stag Timber Division Timber Ridge Forest Products Inc. Timberworld Forest Products Inc. T'loh Forest Products Limited Partnership Tolko Industries Ltd. Tolko Marketing & Sales Ltd. Top Quality Lumber Ltd. TPI Timber Products International
(1975)Ltd. Trans-Pacific Trading Ltd. Treeline Wood Products Ltd. Triad Forest Products, Ltd. Triple Five Quality Wood Inc. Twin Rivers Cedar Products Ltd. Tyee Timber Products Ltd. Uniforet Inc. Uniforet Scierie-Pate Inc. Uphill Wood Supply Inc. UPM Bathurst UPM Blackville UPM Miramichi UPM-Kymmene Miramichi Inc. Usine Sartigan Inc. Vancouver Specialty Cedar Products Ltd. Vanderhoof Specialty Wood Products Inc. Vandermeer Forest Products (Canada) Ltd. Vanderwell Contractors
(1971)Ltd. Vanport Canada, Co. Velcan Forest Products Inc. Vernon Kiln and Millwork Ltd. Visscher Lumber Inc. W.I. Woodtone Industries Inc. Wakefield Cedar Ltd. Wakefield Cedar Products Ltd. Welco Lumber Corporation Weldwood of Canada Ltd. Wentworth Lumber Ltd. West Bay Forest Products and Manufacturing Ltd. West Chilcotin Forest Products Ltd. West Fraser Mills Ltd. Western Forest Products Inc. Western Forest Products Limited Westex Timber Mills Ltd Westmark Products Ltd. Weston Forest Corp. Westshore Specialties Ltd. (dba Sunbury Cedar Sales) West-Wood Industries Ltd. Westwood Manufacturing Ltd. Weyerhaeuser Company Weyerhaeuser Company Limited Weyerhaeuser Saskatchewan Limited WFP Forest Products Limited WFP Lumber Sales Limited WFP Western Lumber Ltd. Wilfrid Paquet & Fils Ltee Williams Brothers Limited Williamsburg Woods & Garden Inc. Winnipeg Forest Products, Inc. Winton Global Lumber Ltd. Woodko Enterprises, Ltd. Woodline Forest Products Ltd. Woodtone Industries Inc. Woodwise Lumber Limited Wynndel Box & Lumber Co. Ltd. Republic of Korea: Certain Polyester Staple Fiber, A-580-839 5/1/05-4/30/06. Huvis Corporation Dongwoo Industry Company Taiwan: Polyester Staple Fiber, A-583-833 5/1/05-4/30/06. Far Eastern Textile Ltd. Period/class or kind Antifriction Bearings Proceedings and Firms Period/Class or Kind France: A-427-801 5/1/05-4/30/06 SKF France S.A. and SKF Aerospace France Ball SNR Roulements Ball Alcatel Vacuum Technology Ball INA Ball Germany: A-428-801 5/1/05-4/30/06 ABB Turbo Systems Limited Ball Gabreuder Reinfort GmbH & Co., KG Ball INA-Schaeffler KG Ball NTN Kugellagerfabrik (Deutschland) Gmbh Ball SKF GmbH Ball Italy: A-475-801 5/1/05-4/30/06 FAG Italia S.p.A Ball SKF Industrie S.p.A Ball Japan: A-588-804 5/1/05-4/30/06 Aisin Seiki Company, Ltd Ball Asahi Seiko Co., Ltd Ball Canon, Inc. Ball JTEKT Corporation (formerly known as Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd) Ball Minebea Co., Ltd Ball Mori Seiki Co., Ltd Ball Nachi-Fujikoshi Corporation Ball Nankai Seiko Co., Ltd Ball Nippon Pillow Block Company, Ltd Ball NSK Ltd Ball NTN Corporation Ball Osaka Pump Co., Ltd Ball Takeshita Seiko, Co., Ltd Ball Tottori Yamakai Bearing Seisakusho, Ltd Ball Sapporo Precision, Inc Ball Toyota Industries Corporation Ball Singapore: A-599-801 5/1/05-4/30/06 NMB/Pelmec Ball United Kingdom: A-412-801 5/1/05-4/30/06 Alcatel Vacuum Technology Ball NSK Bearings Europe Ball The Barden Corporation (U.K.), Ltd Ball SKF Aeoengine Bearings UK Ball Countervailing Duty Proceedings Canada: Certain Softwood Lumber, C-122-839 4/1/05-3/31/06 Suspension Agreements None 1 For the antidumping duty review of certain softwood lumber from Canada (A-122-838), firms should be advised that they have 30 days from the date of publication of this notice to make the Department of Commerce (the Department) aware of any corrections that need to be made to their company's name. The names appear here exactly as they will be identified to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Corrections may include alternative spellings, and any additional names which a company uses to identify itself to CBP. This is not, however, an opportunity to include in the review additional firms for which a review was not requested. The Department may not be able to consider changes requested after the 30 day period has elapsed, and under no circumstances will any such changes result in a change to the automatic liquidation instructions. During any administrative review covering all or part of a period falling between the first and second or third and fourth anniversary of the publication of an antidumping duty order under 19 CFR 351.211 or a determination under 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4) to continue an order or suspended investigation (after sunset review), the Secretary, if requested by a domestic interested party within 30 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the review, will determine, consistent with *FAG Italia* v. *United States* , 291 F.3d 806 (Fed. Cir. 2002), as appropriate, whether antidumping duties have been absorbed by an exporter or producer subject to the review if the subject merchandise is sold in the United States through an importer that is affiliated with such exporter or producer. The request must include the name(s) of the exporter or producer for which the inquiry is requested. Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under administrative protective orders in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. These initiations and this notice are in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)), and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i). Dated: June 28, 2006. Thomas F. Futtner, Acting Office Director, AD/CVD Operations, Office 4, Import Administration. [FR Doc. E6-10381 Filed 6-30-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Advance Notification of Sunset Reviews AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. ACTION: Notice of Upcoming Sunset Reviews. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Every five years, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, the Department of Commerce (“the Department”) and the International Trade Commission automatically initiate and conduct a review to determine whether revocation of a countervailing or antidumping duty order or termination of an investigation suspended under section 704 or 734 would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping or a countervailable subsidy (as the case may be) and of material injury. Upcoming Sunset Reviews for August 2006 The following Sunset Reviews are scheduled for initiation in August 2006 and will appear in that month's Notice of Initiation of Five-year Sunset Reviews. Antidumping Duty Proceedings Department Contact Foundry Coke from China (A-570-862) Jim Nunno
(202)482-0783 Solid Agricultural Grade Ammonium Nitrate from Ukraine (A-823-810) Brandon Farlander
(202)482-0182 Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from Argentina (A-357-814) Zev Primor
(202)482-4114 Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from South Africa (A-791-809) Dana Mermelstein
(202)482-1391 Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Belarus (A-822-804) Brandon Farlander
(202)482-0182 Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from China (A-570-860) Brandon Farlander
(202)482-0182 Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Indonesia (A-560-811) Brandon Farlander
(202)482-0182 Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Latvia (A-449-804) Brandon Farlander
(202)482-0182 Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Moldova (A-841-804) Brandon Farlander
(202)482-0182 Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Poland (A-455-803) Brandon Farlander
(202)482-0182 Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from South Korea (A-580-844) Brandon Farlander
(202)482-0182 Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Ukraine (A-823-809) Brandon Farlander
(202)482-0182 Countervailing Duty Proceedings Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from Argentina (C-357-815) Brandon Farlander
(202)482-0182 Suspended Investigations No suspended investigations are scheduled for initiation in August 2006. The Department's procedures for the conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth in its *Procedures for Conducting Five-year (“Sunset”) Reviews of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders* , 63 FR 13516 (March 20, 1998) and 70 FR 62061 (October 28, 2005). Guidance on methodological or analytical issues relevant to the Department's conduct of Sunset Reviews is set forth in the Department's Policy Bulletin 98.3--Policies Regarding the Conduct of Five-year (“Sunset”) Reviews of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders; Policy Bulletin, 63 FR 18871 (April 16, 1998) (“Sunset Policy Bulletin”). The Notice of Initiation of Five-year (“Sunset”) Reviews provides further information regarding what is required of all parties to participate in Sunset Reviews. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), the Department will maintain and make available a service list for these proceedings. To facilitate the timely preparation of the service list(s), it is requested that those seeking recognition as interested parties to a proceeding contact the Department in writing within 10 days of the publication of the Notice of Initiation. Please note that if the Department receives a Notice of Intent to Participate from a member of the domestic industry within 15 days of the date of initiation, the review will continue. Thereafter, any interested party wishing to participate in the Sunset Review must provide substantive comments in response to the notice of initiation no later than 30 days after the date of initiation. This notice is not required by statute but is published as a service to the international trading community. Dated: June 28, 2006. Thomas F. Futtner, Acting Office Director,AD/CVD Operations, Office 4, Import Administration. [FR Doc. E6-10388 Filed 6-30-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration A-570-848 Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Reviews: Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the People's Republic of China AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On April 29, 2005, in response to requests from Jiangsu Jiushoutang Organisms-Manufacturers Co. Ltd. (“Jiangsu JOM”), Shanghai Sunbeauty Trading Co., Ltd.("Shanghai Sunbeauty”), and Qingdao Wentai Trading Co. Ltd. (“Wentai”), the Department of Commerce (“the Department”) initiated new shipper reviews of the antidumping duty order on freshwater crawfish tail meat from the People's Republic of China (“PRC”). The period of review (“POR”) is September 1, 2004, through February 28, 2005. For the reasons discussed below, we are rescinding these new shipper reviews. EFFECTIVE DATE: July 3, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scot Fullerton or P. Lee Smith, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, 20230; telephone:
(202)482-1386 or
(202)482-1655, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Scope of the Order The product covered by this order is freshwater crawfish tail meat, in all its forms (whether washed or with fat on, whether purged or unpurged), grades, and sizes; whether frozen, fresh, or chilled; and regardless of how it is packed, preserved, or prepared. Excluded from the scope of the order are live crawfish and other whole crawfish, whether boiled, frozen, fresh, or chilled. Also excluded are saltwater crawfish of any type, and parts thereof. Freshwater crawfish tail meat is currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under item numbers 1605.40.10.10 and 1605.40.10.90, which are the new HTSUS numbers for prepared foodstuffs, indicating peeled crawfish tail meat and other, as introduced by the U.S. Customs Service in 2000, and HTSUS items 0306.19.00.10 and 0306.29.00, which are reserved for fish and crustaceans in general. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and Customs purposes only. The written description of the scope of this order is dispositive. Background On March 17, 2005, the Department received properly filed requests for a new shipper review from Shanghai Sunbeauty and Jiangsu JOM. On March 18, 2005, the Department received a properly filed request for a new shipper review from Wentai. On April 29, 2005, the Department published its initiation of these new shipper reviews for the period September 1, 2004, through February 28, 2005. *See Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat From the People's Republic of China: Initiation of New Shipper Antidumping Administrative Reviews* , 70 FR 23987 (May 6, 2005). On June 2, 2005, the Department received Jiangsu JOM, Shanghai Sunbeauty and Wentai's section A questionnaire responses. On June 22, 2005, the Department received Jiangsu JOM and Shanghai Sunbeauty's section C & D questionnaire responses. On June 30, 2005, the Department received Wentai's section C & D questionnaire responses. On July 21, 2005, the Department issued its first supplemental questionnaires to Jiangsu JOM and Shanghai Sunbeauty. On July 25, 2005, the Department issued its first supplemental questionnaire to Wentai. On August 12, 2005, Wentai submitted its response to the Department's first supplemental questionnaire. On August 17, 2005, Jiangsu JOM and Shanghai Sunbeauty submitted their responses to the Department's first supplemental questionnaire. On August 18, 2005, Jiangsu JOM submitted a supplement to their August 17, 2005, submission. On September 19, 2005, the Department issued its second supplemental questionnaire to Jiangsu JOM and Shanghai Sunbeauty. On September 20, 2005, the Department issued its second supplemental questionnaire to Wentai. On October 3, 2005, Jiangsu JOM and Shanghai Sunbeauty submitted their responses to the Department's second supplemental questionnaires. On October 5, 2005, Wentai submitted its response to the Department's second supplemental questionnaire. On October 21, 2005, the Department rejected Jiangsu JOM's response to the Department's second supplemental questionnaire. On October 26, 2005, Jiangsu JOM resubmitted its response to the Department's second supplemental questionnaire. On October 14, 2005, the Department extended the due date for the preliminary results of this new shipper review by 120 days from the original October 26, 2005, deadline until February 23, 2006. *See Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the People's Republic of China: Notice of Extension of Time Limit of Preliminary Results of New Shipper Review* , 70 FR 61117 (October 20, 2005). From October 18 through October 21, 2005, the Department conducted verification of Jiangsu JOM's questionnaire responses at the company's facilities in Xinghua City, Jiangsu, China. See Verification Report for Jiangsu Jiushoutang Organisms Manufacturers Co. Ltd., dated February 17, 2006. From January 23 through January 24, 2006, the Department conducted verification of Jiangsu JOM's affiliated U.S. importer, Easy River Seafood Corp. (“Easy River”), in Alhambra, CA. *See Verification Report for Easy River Seafood Corp.* , dated February 17, 2006. From October 31 through November 1, 2005, the Department conducted verification of Shanghai Sunbeauty's questionnaire responses at the company's sales office in Shanghai, China. *See Verification Report for Shanghai Sunbeauty Trading Co. Ltd.* , dated February 17, 2006. From November 3 through November 4, 2005, the Department conducted verification of Shanghai Sunbeauty's questionnaire responses relating to its producer for the POR, Wuwei Xinhua Food Co. Ltd. (“Wuwei Xinhua”), in Wuwei County, Anhui Province, China. * See Verification Report for Wuwei Xinhua Food Co. Ltd. * , dated February 21, 2006. From January 26 through January 27, 2006, the Department conducted verification of Shanghai Sunbeauty's affiliated importer, Seawind Inc. (“Seawind”), in Redmond, WA. *See Verification Report for Seawind Inc.* , dated February 17, 2006. From January 19 through 20, 2006, the Department conducted verification of Qingdao Wentai's questionnaire responses at the company's facilities in Qingdao, Shandong Province, China. *See Verification Report for Qingdao Wentai Trading Co. Ltd.* , dated February 17, 2006. The Department also conducted verification at the Qingdao Wentai's producer, Nanxian Shunxiang Aquatic Products Foodstuffs Co., Ltd.'s (“Shunxiang”) facilities in Nanzhou Town, Hunan Province, China, from January 16 to January 17, 2006. *See Verification Report for Nanxian Shunxiang Aquatic Products Foodstuffs Co. Ltd.* , dated February 17, 2006. On February 23, 2006, the Department completed its preliminary *bona fides* analysis for Jiangsu JOM's, Shanghai Sunbeauty's, and Wentai's single sales to the United States and stated the Department's preliminary intention to rescind the new shipper reviews of all three companies. *See Memorandum to James C. Doyle, Director, Office 9, from Scot T. Fullerton and Prentiss Lee Smith, Case Analysts, Office 9: Bona Fides Analysis and Intent to Rescind New Shipper Review of Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the People's Republic of China for Jiangsu Jiushoutang Organisms-Manufactures Co., Ltd.* , dated February 23, 2006 (“ *Jiangsu JOM Bona Fides Memo* ”), *Memorandum to James C. Doyle, Director, Office 9, from Scot T. Fullerton and Prentiss Lee Smith, Case Analysts, Office 9: Bona Fides Analysis and Intent to Rescind New Shipper Review of Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the People's Republic of China for Shanghai Sunbeauty Trading Co. Ltd.* , dated February 23, 2006 (“ *Shanghai Sunbeauty Bona Fides Memo* ”), and *Memorandum to James C. Doyle, Director, Office 9, from Scot T. Fullerton and Prentiss Lee Smith, Case Analysts, Office 9: Bona Fides Analysis and Intent to Rescind New Shipper Review of Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the People's Republic of China for Qingdao Wentai Trading Co. Ltd.* , dated February 23, 2006 (“ *Wentai Bona Fides Memo* ”). In concurrence with issuing its preliminary results, the Department provided interested parties with an opportunity to submit comments on the Department's *bona fides* analysis memos. Shanghai Sunbeauty provided comments on the Department's *Shanghai Sunbeauty Bona Fides Memo* on April 7, 2006, and Jiangsu JOM provided comments on the Department's *Jiangsu JOM Bona Fides Memo* on April 7, 2006. Wentai provided comments on the Department's *Wentai Bona Fides Memo* on April 7, 2006, which the Department rejected on April 13, 2006, for containing untimely new factual information. Wentai resubmitted its comments on April 14, 2006. The Crawfish Processors Alliance, the Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry, and Bob Odom, Commissioner, collectively provided rebuttal comments on April 14, 2006. Rescission of Review Concurrent with this notice, we are issuing an issues and decision memorandum detailing our analysis of the comments received regarding our decision to preliminarily rescind the reviews for all three companies based on the non- *bona fide* nature of their sales. *See Memorandum from Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration to David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results in the 2004/2005 Semiannual New Shipper Review of Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the People's Republic of China* dated June 23, 2006 (“ *Decision Memo* ”). In evaluating whether or not a sale is commercially reasonable, and therefore *bona fide* , the Department has considered, *inter alia* , such factors as
(1)the timing of the sale;
(2)the price and quantity;
(3)the expenses arising from the transaction;
(4)whether the goods were resold at a profit; and
(5)whether the transaction was at arms-length. *See e.g., Tianjin Tiancheng Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v. U.S.* , 366 F. Supp. 2d 1246, 1249 (CIT 2005) (“ *TTPC* ”), citing *Am. Silicon Techs. v. U.S.* , 110 F. Supp. 2d 992, 995 (CIT 2000). However, the analysis is not limited to these factors alone. The Department examines a number of factors, all of which may speak to the commercial realities surrounding the sale of subject merchandise. While some *bona fides* issues may share commonalities across various Department cases, each one is company-specific and may vary with the facts surrounding each sale. *See Certain Preserved Mushrooms From the People's Republic of China: Final Results and Partial Rescission of the New Shipper Review and Final Results and Partial Rescission of the Third Antidumping Duty Administrative Review* , 68 FR 41304 (July 11, 2003) and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum, at 20. The weight given to each factor considered will depend on the circumstances surrounding the sale. *See TTPC* , 366 F. Supp. 2d at 1263. As discussed in detail in the *Decision Memo* , the Department has determined that the sale made by Jiangsu JOM was not *bona fide* because: 1) the price and quantity for Jiangsu JOM's sale of crawfish tail meat were atypical of its post-POR sales and of other exports from the PRC of the subject merchandise into the United States during the POR; 2) Jiangsu JOM's failed to disclose relationships between it and other crawfish tail meat exporters and producers; 3) Jiangsu JOM completely changed its U.S. customer base after the POR sale; as well as 4) other indicia of a non- *bona fide* transaction. As discussed in detail in the *Decision Memo* , the Department has determined that the sale made by Shanghai Sunbeauty was not *bona fide* because: 1) the price and quantity for Shanghai Sunbeauty's sale of crawfish tail meat were atypical of its post-POR sales and of other exports from the PRC of the subject merchandise into the United States during the POR; 2) Seawind's POR purchase and cash deposit was atypical; 3) the source and timeliness of payment from the POR customer was atypical; as well as 4) other indicia of a non- *bona fide* transaction. As discussed in detail in the *Decision Memo* , the Department has determined that the sale made by Wentai was not *bona fide* because: 1) the price and quantity for Wentai's sale of crawfish tail meat were atypical vis-a-vis other exports from the PRC of the subject merchandise into the United States during the POR; 2) the circumstances surrounding the single POR sale and its negotiation were unusual; 3) the exporter and producer failed to report certain business relationships; as well as 4) the atypical circumstances surrounding the formation of Wentai and Shunxiang. Wentai, Shanghai Sunbeauty, and Jiangsu JOM each only made a single, non-bona fide sale during the POR. Therefore, the Department is rescinding these reviews because there are no reviewable sales during the POR. *See TTCP* , 366 F. Supp. 2d at1249. Because the Department is rescinding the new shipper reviews, we are not making a determination as to whether Jiangsu JOM, Shanghai Sunbeauty, and Wentai qualify for separate rates. Therefore, Jiangsu JOM, Shanghai Sunbeauty, and Wentai will remain part of the PRC-wide entity. Notification The Department will notify U.S. Customs and Border Protection that bonding is no longer permitted to fulfill security requirements for shipments by Jiangsu JOM, Shanghai Sunbeauty, and Wentai of freshwater crawfish tail meat from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption in the United States on or after the publication of this rescission notice in the **Federal Register** , and that a cash deposit of 223.01 percent *ad valorem* should be collected for any entries exported by Jiangsu JOM, Shanghai Sunbeauty, and Wentai. This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders (“APO”) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO material or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanctions. We are issuing and publishing this determination and notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i) of the Act. Dated: June 23, 2006. David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E6-10375 Filed 6-30-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration (A-570-822, A-583-820) Continuation of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Helical Spring Lock Washers from the People's Republic of China and Taiwan AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: As a result of the determinations by the Department of Commerce (“the Department”) and the International Trade Commission (“ITC”) that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on certain helical spring lock washers from the People's Republic of China (“PRC”) and Taiwan would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and material injury to an industry in the United States, the Department is publishing notice of continuation of these antidumping duty orders. EFFECTIVE DATE: July 3, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Nunno, AD/CVD Operations, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, 20230; telephone:
(202)482-0783. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On January 3, 2006, the Department initiated and the ITC instituted sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders on certain helical spring lock washers from the PRC and Taiwan pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (“the Act”). 1 1 *See Initiation of Five-Year (“Sunset”) Reviews* , 70 FR 91 (January 3, 2006); and *Helical Spring Lock Washers From China and Taiwan* , Investigations Nos. 731-TA-624 and 625 (Second Review), 71 FR 133 (January 3, 2006). As a result of its reviews, the Department found that revocation of the antidumping duty orders would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and notified the ITC of the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail were the orders to be revoked. 2 On June 20, 2006, the ITC published its determination that, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, revocation of the antidumping duty orders on certain helical spring lock washers from the PRC and Taiwan would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. 3 2 *See Certain Helical Spring Lock Washers from the People's Republic of China and Taiwan: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders* , 71 FR 27227 (May 10, 2006). 3 *See Helical Spring Lock Washers From China and Taiwan* , Investigation Nos. 701-TA-624 and 625 (Second Review), 71 FR 35449 (June 20, 2006). Scope of the Orders The products covered by both antidumping duty orders are certain helical spring lock washers of carbon steel, of carbon alloy steel, or of stainless steel, heat-treated or non-heat-treated, plated or non-plated, with ends that are off-line. Certain helical spring lock washers are designed to:
(1)function as a spring to compensate for developed looseness between the component parts of a fastened assembly;
(2)distribute the load over a larger area for screws or bolts; and
(3)provide a hardened bearing surface. The scope does not include internal or external tooth washers, nor does it include spring lock washers made of other metals, such as copper. Certain helical spring lock washers subject to these orders are currently classifiable under subheading 7318.21.0030 of the *Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States* (“HTSUS”). Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this proceeding is dispositive. On September 30, 1997, the Department determined that certain helical spring lock washers which are imported into the United States in an uncut, coil form are within the scope of the orders. *See Notice of Scope Rulings* , 62 FR 62288 (November 21, 1997). Determination As a result of the determinations by the Department and the ITC that revocation of these antidumping duty orders would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act, the Department hereby orders the continuation of the antidumping duty orders on certain helical spring lock washers from the PRC and Taiwan. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect antidumping duty cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of continuation of these orders will be the date of publication in the **Federal Register** of this Notice of Continuation. Pursuant to sections 751(c)(2) and 751(c)(6)(A) of the Act, the Department intends to initiate the next five-year reviews of these orders not later than June 2011. These five-year (sunset) reviews and this notice are in accordance with section 751(c) of the Act. Dated: June 27, 2006. David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E6-10382 Filed 6-30-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration (A-570-863) Honey from the People's Republic of China: Notice of Extension of Time Limit for the Preliminary Results of New Shipper Review AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. EFFECTIVE DATE: July 3, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Helen Kramer or Patrick Edwards, AD/CVD Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202)482-0405 or
(202)482-8029, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On January 25, 2006, the Department initiated new shipper reviews of honey from the People's Republic of China in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). *See Honey from the People's Republic of China: Initiation of New Shipper Antidumping Duty Review* , 71 FR 5051 (January 31, 2006). The reviews were initiated based on timely requests received from Inner Mongolia Altin Bee-Keeping Co., Ltd., Dongtai Peak Honey Industry Co., Ltd., Qinhuangdao Municipal Dafeng Industrial Co., Ltd., and Tianjin Eulia Honey Co. Ltd, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.214(c). The preliminary results are currently due no later than July 24, 2006. Extension of Time Limits for Preliminary Results Section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act requires the Department to issue the preliminary results of a new shipper review within 180 days after the date on which the new shipper review was initiated. The Department may, however, extend the deadline for completion of the preliminary results of a new shipper review to 300 days if it determines that the case is extraordinarily complicated. *See* section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(2). The Department has determined that it is not practicable to complete this review within the current time limit due to complex issues in the case and the late verification schedule. Accordingly, the Department is extending the time limit for the completion of the preliminary results until November 21, 2006, which is the first business day 300 days from the date on which this new shipper review was initiated, in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(2). The final results, in turn, will be due 90 days after the date of issuance of the preliminary results, unless extended. We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: June 21, 2006. Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E6-10376 Filed 6-30-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration (A-533-810) Notice of Final Results and Final Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Stainless Steel Bar from India AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On March 7, 2006, the Department of Commerce published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on stainless steel bar from India. The period of review is February 1, 2004, through January 31, 2005. This review covers sales of stainless steel bar from India with respect to Chandan Steel, Ltd. We provided interested parties with an opportunity to comment on the preliminary results of this review, but received no comments. The final results do not differ from the preliminary results of this review. We will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to assess antidumping duties on the subject merchandise exported by this company. EFFECTIVE DATE: July 3, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Holland, AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20230; telephone:
(202)482-1279. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Since the publication of the preliminary results of this review ( *see Stainless Steel Bar from India: Notice of Preliminary Results and Preliminary Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review* , 71 FR 11390 (March 7, 2006) (“ *Preliminary Results* ”)), the following events have occurred: the Department of Commerce (“the Department”) invited interested parties to comment on the preliminary results of this review. No comments were received. Scope of the Order Merchandise covered by the order is shipments of stainless steel bar (“SSB”). SSB means articles of stainless steel in straight lengths that have been either hot-rolled, forged, turned, cold-drawn, cold-rolled or otherwise cold-finished, or ground, having a uniform solid cross section along their whole length in the shape of circles, segments of circles, ovals, rectangles (including squares), triangles, hexagons, octagons, or other convex polygons. SSB includes cold-finished SSBs that are turned or ground in straight lengths, whether produced from hot-rolled bar or from straightened and cut rod or wire, and reinforcing bars that have indentations, ribs, grooves, or other deformations produced during the rolling process. Except as specified above, the term does not include stainless steel semi-finished products, cut-to-length flat-rolled products ( *i.e.* , cut-to-length rolled products which if less than 4.75 mm in thickness have a width measuring at least 10 times the thickness, or if 4.75 mm or more in thickness having a width which exceeds 150 mm and measures at least twice the thickness), wire ( *i.e.* , cold-formed products in coils, of any uniform solid cross section along their whole length, which do not conform to the definition of flat-rolled products), and angles, shapes, and sections. The SSB subject to these reviews is currently classifiable under subheadings 7222.11.00.05, 7222.11.00.50, 7222.19.00.05, 7222.19.00.50, 7222.20.00.05, 7222.20.00.45, 7222.20.00.75, and 7222.30.00.00 of the *Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States* (“HTSUS”). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, our written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. On May 23, 2005, the Department issued a final scope ruling that SSB manufactured in the United Arab Emirates out of stainless steel wire rod from India is not subject to the scope of this proceeding. See Memorandum to Barbara E. Tillman, *Antidumping Duty Orders on Stainless Steel Bar from India and Stainless Steel Wire Rod from India: Final Scope Ruling* (May 23, 2005). The ruling is on file in the Central Records Unit, Room B-099 of the main Department building (“CRU”). Period of Review The period of review (“POR”) is February 1, 2004, through January 31, 2005. Partial Rescission of Review According to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), the Department will rescind an administrative review in whole or only with respect to a particular exporter or producer, if we conclude that, during the POR, there were no entries, exports, or sales of the subject merchandise, as the case may be. In the *Preliminary Results* , the Department preliminarily found that Ferro Alloys Corporation, Ltd. (“Facor”) reported no entries of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR, a fact which the Department confirmed by conducting an inquiry with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”). Therefore, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), and consistent with the *Preliminary Results* , we are rescinding this review with respect to Facor. Final Results of the Review These final results remain unchanged from the *Preliminary Results* . We provided an opportunity for parties to comment on our preliminary results and received no comments. Therefore, we find that the following percentage margin exists for the period February 1, 2004, through January 31, 2005: Exporter/Manufacturer Margin Chandan Steel, Ltd. 21.02 Assessment Rates The Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. For Chandan, we will instruct CBP to liquidate entries at the rate indicated above. The Department will issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to the CBP within 15 days of publication of these final results of review. In accordance with the Department's clarification of its assessment policy ( *see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties* , 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003)), in the event any entries were made during the period of review through intermediaries under the CBP case number for Facor, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the all-others rate in effect on the date of entry. Cash Deposit Rates The following antidumping duty deposits will be required on all shipments of SSB from India entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption, effective on or after the publication date of these final results of administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(1) of the Act:
(1)the cash deposit rates for the reviewed company will be the rate listed above (except no cash deposit will be required if a company's weighted-average margin is *de minimis, i.e.* , less than 0.5 percent);
(2)for previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent period;
(3)if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, the previous review, or the original investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and
(4)if neither the exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm covered in this or any previous reviews, the cash deposit rate will be 12.45 percent, the “all others” rate established in the less than fair value investigation. *See Stainless Steel Bar from India; Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value* , 59 FR 66915 (December 28, 1994). These cash deposit requirements shall remain in effect until publication of the final results of the next administrative review. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Notification Regarding APOs This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders (“APOs”) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. We are issuing and publishing these results of review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: June 27, 2006. David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E6-10386 Filed 6-30-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration (A-580-834) Notice of Final Results of Changed Circumstances Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from the Republic of Korea AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On May 12, 2006, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published a notice of initiation and preliminary results of its changed circumstances review of the antidumping duty order on stainless steel sheet and strip in coils (SSSSC) from the Republic of Korea (Korea). *See Notice of Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Antidumping Duty Review: Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from the Republic of Korea* , 71 FR 27680 (May 12, 2006) ( *Preliminary Results* ). We have now completed that review. For these final results, as in the *Preliminary Results* , we determine that: 1) Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai) is the successor-in-interest to INI Steel Company (INI), formerly Inchon Iron and Steel Co., Ltd. (Inchon), a respondent in the less-than-fair-value
(LTFV)investigation; and 2) SSSSC produced and exported by Hyundai should be excluded from the antidumping duty order. EFFECTIVE DATE: March 10, 2006 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irina Itkin or Brianne Riker, AD/CVD Operations, Office 2, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone
(202)482-0656 and
(202)482-0629, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On July 27, 1999, the Department published in the **Federal Register** (64 FR 40555) the antidumping duty order on SSSSC from Korea. Inchon was excluded from the order because its dumping margin was de minimis in the LTFV investigation. In 2001, INI requested that the Department conduct a changed circumstances review to confirm that INI was the successor-in-interest to Inchon. On June 28, 2002, the Department found that INI was the successor-in-interest to Inchon and that INI should be excluded from the antidumping duty order on SSSSC from Korea consistent with the exclusion determination for Inchon in the LTFV investigation. See Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from the Republic of Korea: Notice of Final Results of Changed Circumstances Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 67 FR 43583 (June 28, 2002). On March 22, 2006, Hyundai submitted a written request that the Department conduct a changed circumstances review to confirm that Hyundai is the successor-in-interest to INI and that subject merchandise produced by this entity should not be subject to antidumping duties. On May 12, 2006, the Department published a notice of initiation and preliminary results of its changed circumstances review of the antidumping duty order on SSSSC from Korea. *See Preliminary Results* . In that determination, we preliminarily found that Hyundai is the successor-in-interest to INI. Interested parties were invited to comment on the preliminary results. No party submitted comments. Scope of Order The products covered are certain stainless steel sheet and strip in coils. Stainless steel is an alloy steel containing, by weight, 1.2 percent or less of carbon and 10.5 percent or more of chromium, with or without other elements. The subject sheet and strip is a flat-rolled product in coils that is greater than 9.5 millimeters in width and less than 4.75 millimeters in thickness, and that is annealed or otherwise heat treated and pickled or otherwise descaled. The subject sheet and strip may also be further processed ( *e.g.* , cold-rolled, polished, aluminized, coated, etc.) provided that it maintains the specific dimensions of sheet and strip following such processing. The merchandise subject to this order is classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) at subheadings: 7219.13.0031, 7219.13.0051, 7219.13.0071, 7219.1300.81, 1 7219.14.0030, 7219.14.0065, 7219.14.0090, 7219.32.0005, 7219.32.0020, 7219.32.0025, 7219.32.0035, 7219.32.0036, 7219.32.0038, 7219.32.0042, 7219.32.0044, 7219.33.0005, 7219.33.0020, 7219.33.0025, 7219.33.0035, 7219.33.0036, 7219.33.0038, 7219.33.0042, 7219.33.0044, 7219.34.0005, 7219.34.0020, 7219.34.0025, 7219.34.0030, 7219.34.0035, 7219.35.0005, 7219.35.0015, 7219.35.0030, 7219.35.0035, 7219.90.0010, 7219.90.0020, 7219.90.0025, 7219.90.0060, 7219.90.0080, 7220.12.1000, 7220.12.5000, 7220.20.1010, 7220.20.1015, 7220.20.1060, 7220.20.1080, 7220.20.6005, 7220.20.6010, 7220.20.6015, 7220.20.6060, 7220.20.6080, 7220.20.7005, 7220.20.7010, 7220.20.7015, 7220.20.7060, 7220.20.7080, 7220.20.8000, 7220.20.9030, 7220.20.9060, 7220.90.0010, 7220.90.0015, 7220.90.0060, and 7220.90.0080. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the Department's written description of the merchandise subject to the order is dispositive. 1 Due to changes to the HTSUS numbers in 2001, 7219.13.0030, 7219.13.0050, 7219.13.0070, and 7219.13.0080 are now 7219.13.0031, 7219.13.0051, 7219.13.0071, and 7219.13.0081, respectively. Excluded from the scope of this order are the following: 1) sheet and strip that is not annealed or otherwise heat treated and pickled or otherwise descaled; 2) sheet and strip that is cut to length; 3) plate ( *i.e.* , flat-rolled stainless steel products of a thickness of 4.75 millimeters or more); 4) flat wire ( *i.e.* , cold-rolled sections, with a prepared edge, rectangular in shape, of a width of not more than 9.5 millimeters); and 5) razor blade steel. Razor blade steel is a flat-rolled product of stainless steel, not further worked than cold-rolled (cold- reduced), in coils, of a width of not more than 23 millimeters and a thickness of 0.266 millimeters or less, containing, by weight, 12.5 to 14.5 percent chromium, and certified at the time of entry to be used in the manufacture of razor blades. *See* Chapter 72 of the HTSUS, “Additional U.S. Note” 1(d). Flapper valve steel is also excluded from the scope. Flapper valve steel is defined as stainless steel strip in coils containing, by weight, between 0.37 and 0.43 percent carbon, between 1.15 and 1.35 percent molybdenum, and between 0.20 and 0.80 percent manganese. This steel also contains, by weight, phosphorus of 0.025 percent or less, silicon of between 0.20 and 0.50 percent, and sulfur of 0.020 percent or less. The product is manufactured by means of vacuum arc remelting, with inclusion controls for sulphide of no more than 0.04 percent and for oxide of no more than 0.05 percent. Flapper valve steel has a tensile strength of between 210 and 300 ksi, yield strength of between 170 and 270 ksi, 8 ksi, and a hardness
(Hv)of between 460 and 590. Flapper valve steel is most commonly used to produce specialty flapper valves in compressors. Also excluded is a product referred to as suspension foil, a specialty steel product that is used in the manufacture of suspension assemblies for computer disk drives. Suspension foil is described as 302/304 grade or 202 grade stainless steel of a thickness between 14 and 127 microns, with a thickness tolerance of 2.01 microns, and surface glossiness of 200 to 700 percent Gs. Suspension foil must be supplied in coil widths of not more than 407 millimeters, and with a mass of 225 kilograms or less. Roll marks may only be visible on one side, with no scratches of measurable depth. The material must exhibit residual stresses of two millimeter depth. The material must exhibit residual stresses of two millimeters maximum deflection, and flatness of 1.6 millimeters over 685 millimeters length. Certain stainless steel foil for automotive catalytic converters is also excluded from the scope of this order. This stainless steel strip in coils is a specialty foil with a thickness of between 20 and 110 microns used to produce a metallic substrate with a honeycomb structure for use in automotive catalytic converters. The steel contains, by weight, carbon of no more than 0.030 percent, silicon of no more than one percent, manganese of no more than one percent, chromium of between 19 and 22 percent, aluminum of no less than 5.0 percent, phosphorus of no more than 0.045 percent, sulfur of no more than 0.03 percent, lanthanum of less than 0.002 or greater than 0.05 percent, and total rare earth elements of more than 0.06 percent, with the balance iron. Permanent magnet iron-chromium-cobalt alloy stainless strip is also excluded from the scope of this order. This ductile stainless steel strip contains, by weight, 26 to 30 percent chromium, and seven to 10 percent cobalt, with the remainder of iron, in widths 228.6 millimeters or less, and a thickness between 0.127 and 1.270 millimeters. It exhibits magnetic remanence between 9,000 and 12,000 gauss, and a coercivity of between 50 and 300 oersteds. This product is most commonly used in electronic sensors and is currently available under proprietary trade names such as “Arnokrome III.” 2 2 “Arnokrome III” is a trademark of the Arnold Engineering Company. Certain electrical resistance alloy steel is also excluded from the scope of this order. This product is defined as a non-magnetic stainless steel manufactured to American Society of Testing and Materials specification B344 and containing, by weight, 36 percent nickel, 18 percent chromium, and 46 percent iron, and is most notable for its resistance to high temperature corrosion. It has a melting point of 1,390 degrees Celsius and displays a creep rupture limit of four kilograms per square millimeter at 1,000 degrees Celsius. This steel is most commonly used in the production of heating ribbons for circuit breakers and industrial furnaces, and in rheostats for railway locomotives. The product is currently available under proprietary trade names such as “Gilphy 36.” 3 3 “Gilphy 36” is a trademark of Imphy, S.A. Certain martensitic precipitation-hardenable stainless steel is also excluded from the scope of this order. This high-strength, ductile stainless steel product is designated under the Unified Numbering System as S45500-grade steel, and contains, by weight, 11 to 13 percent chromium, and seven to 10 percent nickel. Carbon, manganese, silicon and molybdenum each comprise, by weight, 0.05 percent or less, with phosphorus and sulfur each comprising, by weight, 0.03 percent or less. This steel has copper, niobium, and titanium added to achieve aging, and will exhibit yield strengths as high as 1,700 Mpa and ultimate tensile strengths as high as 1,750 Mpa after aging, with elongation percentages of 3 percent or less in 50 millimeters. It is generally provided in thicknesses between 0.635 and 0.787 millimeters, and in widths of 25.4 millimeters. This product is most commonly used in the manufacture of television tubes and is currently available under proprietary trade names such as “Durphynox 17.” 4 4 “Durphynox 17” is a trademark of Imphy, S.A. Finally, three specialty stainless steels typically used in certain industrial blades and surgical and medical instruments are also excluded from the scope of this order. These include stainless steel strip in coils used in the production of textile cutting tools ( *e.g.* , carpet knives). 5 This steel is similar to AISI grade 420 but containing, by weight, 0.5 to 0.7 percent of molybdenum. The steel also contains, by weight, carbon of between 1.0 and 1.1 percent, sulfur of 0.020 percent or less, and includes between 0.20 and 0.30 percent copper and between 0.20 and 0.50 percent cobalt. This steel is sold under proprietary names such as “GIN4 Mo.” The second excluded stainless steel strip in coils is similar to AISI 420-J2 and contains, by weight, carbon of between 0.62 and 0.70 percent, silicon of between 0.20 and 0.50 percent, manganese of between 0.45 and 0.80 percent, phosphorus of no more than 0.025 percent, and sulfur of no more than 0.020 percent. This steel has a carbide density on average of 100 carbide particles per 100 square microns. An example of this product is “GIN5” steel. The third specialty steel has a chemical composition similar to AISI 420 F, with carbon of between 0.37 and 0.43 percent, molybdenum of between 1.15 and 1.35 percent, but lower manganese of between 0.20 and 0.80 percent, phosphorus of no more than 0.025 percent, silicon of between 0.20 and 0.50 percent, and sulfur of no more than 0.020 percent. This product is supplied with a hardness of more than Hv 500 guaranteed after customer processing, and is supplied as, for example, “GIN6.” 5 This list of uses is illustrative and provided for descriptive purposes only. Final Results of Review Based on our analysis in the *Preliminary Results* , we find that Hyundai is the successor-in-interest to INI. Based on evidence on the record, we find that Hyundai's organizational structure, management, production facilities, supplier relationships, and customers have remained essentially unchanged since its name change from INI. Further, we find that Hyundai operates as the same business entity as INI. Because INI is excluded from the antidumping duty order on SSSSC from Korea, we will apply this determination retroactively and will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to liquidate, without regard to antidumping duties, all unliquidated entries of subject merchandise produced and exported by Hyundai, and entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after March 10, 2006, the date of INI's name change to Hyundai, in accordance with past precedent. *See Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Italy: Notice of Final Results of Changed Circumstances Antidumping Duty Review* , 71 FR 24643 (Apr. 26, 2006); *Certain Hot-Rolled Lead and Bismuth Carbon Steel Products from the United Kingdom: Final Results of Changed-Circumstances Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews* , 64 FR 66880 (Nov. 30, 1999). Notification This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders
(APOs)of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 352.305(a)(3). Timely notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. This determination and notice are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.216. Dated: June 27, 2006. David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E6-10387 Filed 6-30-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Notice of Intent To Conduct Restoration Planning AGENCY: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. SUMMARY: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), along with the other natural resource trustees, has determined that the impacts of the November 26, 2004, discharge of crude oil from the *M/T ATHOS I (Athos),* over which such trustees have jurisdiction, warrant conducting a natural resource damage assessment that will include restoration planning. NOAA is hereby providing notice of efforts to plan restoration actions for injuries resulting from this incident. The purpose of this restoration planning is to evaluate potential injuries to natural resources and services, and use that information to determine the need for and scale of restoration actions. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, contact Jim Hoff at: NOAA, Damage Assessment Center, Room 10218, 1305 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910-3281, 301-713-3038, x 188 (ph), 301-713-4387 (fax), *James.Hoff@noaa.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 26, 2004, the *Athos,* registered under the flag of Cyprus, owned by Frescati Shipping Company, Ltd., and operated by Taskos Shipping and Trading, discharged approximately 264,000 gallons of crude oil into the Delaware river and nearby tributaries. The owner and operator of the vessel may be “Responsible Parties” for this incident as defined by the Oil Pollution Act
(OPA)33 U.S.C. 2701 *et seq.* The final determination of liability for this incident is being considered by the U.S. Coast Guard. Numerous natural resources, including aquatic habitat and animals and the recreational uses they support, were exposed to the toxic and smothering effects of the oil discharged from the Athos. Adult and larval fish and shellfish, including the federally- endangered shortnose sturgeon winter in certain areas of the Delaware River, and the waters around Little Tinicum Island are known to contain high numbers of pre-spawn and spawning striped bass in April and May. Delaware Bay supports commercial and natural oyster beds, commercial blue crab, horseshoe crab, and whelk fisheries, as well as a variety of recreational fisheries. Several rare tidal marsh plants are also found in the region, including wild rice, waterhemp ragweed, Walter's barnyard grass, swamp-beggar-ticks, and marsh fleabane. Fresh to saltwater wetlands wild rice marshes, sand beaches, mud flats, and tidal creeks are among the environmentally important shorelines potentially affected by the spill. Bird and wildlife resources at risk include migrating marsh birds, egret and heron rookeries, eagles and osprey, and migratory shorebirds. The federally-threatened piping plover inhabits the Lower Delaware Bay. There are also a variety of mink, otter, turtles, and terrestrial fauna that use the affected area. Many types of recreation are also popular along the Delaware River in the areas affected by the spill, waterfowl hunting, boating, fishing, crabbing, as well as beach and other shoreline use. Under OPA, state and Federal agencies and Indian tribes are designated as natural resource trustees, responsible for assessing natural resource losses and restoring those losses to baseline conditions, *i.e.* , the condition that would have been had the incident not occurred. Trustees for the *Athos* incident are the U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA; U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI), Fish and Wildlife Service; Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Department of Environmental Protection, Game Commission, and Fish and Boat Commission; State of New Jersey, Department of Environmental Protection; and State of Delaware, Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control. By agreement of the trustees, NOAA is serving as the lead administrative trustee. The trustees are designated pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 2706(b), Executive Order 12777, and the National Contingency Plan, 40 CFR 300.600 and 300.605. State laws (7 Del. C. Chapters 60, 62, and 91; N.J.S.A. § 13:lD—9f and 9q,; N.J.S.A. § 58:10-23.11 *et seq.* ; N.J.S.A. § 58:1OA-1 *et seq;* 35 P.S. § 6020.301(14); 30 Pa. C.S.A. § 2506; 35 P.S. § 691.605; 71 P.S. § 1340.101 *et seq.* ) describe state trust resources, including the following: vegetated wetlands, surface waters, ground waters, air, soil, wildlife, aquatic life, and the appropriate habitats on which they depend. DOI, through the involvement of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, is trustee for natural resources described within the National Contingency Plan, 40 CFR 300.600(b)(2) and (3), which include the following and their supporting ecosystems: migratory birds, anadramous fish, endangered species and marine mammals, federally owned minerals, certain federally managed water resources, and natural resources located on, over, or under land administered by the DOI. NOAA's trust resources include, but are not limited to, commercial and recreational fish species, anadramous and catadromous fish species, marshes and other coastal habitats, marine mammals, and endangered and threatened marine species. Immediately following the spill, the trustees initiated a number of preassessment data collection activities, pursuant to OPA, to make an initial determination as to whether natural resources or services have been injured or are likely to be injured by the discharge. Specific preassessment activities included shoreline (aerial and ground) and resource ( *e.g.* , bird and wildlife, horseshoe crab, etc.) surveys and ephemeral data collection ( *e.g.* , water, sediment, and fish and shellfish tissue samples). The trustees' Preassessment Data Report details these preassessment data collection efforts, and provides laboratory results and supporting information. This Preassessment Data Report is available for review at: *http://www.darrp.noaa.gov/northeast/athos/index.html* . Findings from the preassessment efforts demonstrate or suggest four general areas of natural resource injuries:
(1)Shorelines (marshes, sandy and coarse gravel beaches, tidal flats, etc.);
(2)aquatic resources, particularly subtidal benthic habitat;
(3)birds and wildlife; and
(4)lost interim use of public services (fishing, hunting, and boating). The trustees have implemented or are developing studies to assess the extent of these injuries. *Trustee Determinations:* Following the notice of the discharge, the natural resource trustees have made the following determinations required by 15 CFR 990.41(a): The natural resource trustees have jurisdiction to pursue restoration pursuant to OPA, 33 U.S.C. 2702 and 2706(c); 40 CFR part 300, the OPA Natural Resource Damage Assessments Final Rule, 15 CFR part 990, 61 FR 440 (January 6, 1996); 7 Del. C. Chapters 60, 62, and 91; N.J.S.A. § 13:lD—9f and 9q, N.J.S.A. § 58:10-23.11 *et seq.* ; N.J.S.A. § 58:1OA-1 *et seq.* ; 35 P.S. § 6020.301(14); 30 Pa. C.S.A. § 2506; 35 P.S. § 691.605; 71 P.S. § 1340.101 *et seq.* The trustees have further determined that the discharge of crude oil into the Delaware River and its tributaries on November 26, 2004, was an incident, as defined in 15 CFR 990.30. This discharge was not permitted under state, Federal, or local law. The discharge was not from a public vessel. The discharge was not from an onshore facility subject to the Trans-Alaska Pipeline Authority Act, 43 U.S.C. 1651, *et seq.* Natural resources under the trusteeship of the natural resource trustees listed above may have been injured as a result of the incident. The crude oil discharged contains components that may be harmful to aquatic organisms, birds, wildlife, and vegetation. Vegetation, birds, and or aquatic organisms may have been exposed to the oil from this discharge, and injury to some flora and fauna and lost ecological services may have resulted from this incident. Because the conditions of 15 CFR 990.41(a) were met, as described above, the trustees made the further determination pursuant to 15 CFR 990.41(b) to proceed with preassessment. The owner and operator, at the invitation of the trustees, pursuant to 15 CFR 990.14(c), agreed to participate in the preassessment. Determination To Conduct Restoration Activities For the reasons discussed below, the natural resource trustees have made the determinations required by the 15 CFR 990.42(a) and are providing notice pursuant to 15 CFR 990.44 that they intend to conduct restoration planning in order to develop restoration alternatives that will restore, replace, rehabilitate, or acquire the equivalent of natural resources injured and/or natural resource services lost as a result of this incident. Injuries have resulted from this incident, the extent of which has not been fully determined at this time. The trustees base this determination upon data presented in the Preassessment Data Report, which were collected and analyzed pursuant to 15 CFR 990.43, which demonstrate that resources and services have been injured from this incident including, but not limited to, the following:
(A)*Shorelines:* Preassessment shoreline surveys documented oil over 115 river miles (280 miles of shoreline) from the Tacony-Palmyra Bridge to south of the Smyrna River in Delaware. Data have been collected on types of shorelines impacted and degree(s) of oiling that will be used to define the extent and degree of impact.
(B)*Birds and Wildlife:* Aerial and ground surveys were conducted following the incident assess the species composition and abundance of birds in the spill area, as well as the extent and degree of oiling of non-recovered wildlife. By May 2005, a number of oiled birds were observed; 206 wild birds were collected dead, died at the rehabilitation center, or were unable to be released to the wild, and 337 birds were rehabilitated and released alive. Recovered wildlife that were collected dead or died at the rehabilitation center included three turtles, one squirrel, one opossum, one red fox, and one woodchuck. Two turtles were unable to be released to the wild and were placed domestically. The trustees have developed studies to determine the impact of the incident on birds and wildlife.
(C)*Aquatic resources:* Oil was observed suspended though the water column and on the river bottom. The trustees collected numerous water, sediment, and fish and shellfish tissue samples that will be used to assess the effect of the incident on aquatic resources during the damage assessment.
(D)*Lost Use:* Following the incident, hunting and boating advisories were issued in Delaware and New Jersey, closing certain areas. In Delaware, state lands were closed to hunting as far south as Cedar Swamp Wildlife Area. In New Jersey, the hunting advisory included most areas within five miles of the River from the Tacony-Palmyra Bridge to the nuclear power facility in Salem, NJ. The advisories were in effect for about two weeks. Although response actions were pursued, the nature of the discharge and the sensitivity of the environment precluded prevention of injuries to some natural resources. The trustees believe that injured natural resources could return to baseline through natural or enhanced recovery, but interim losses have occurred and will continue to occur until a return to baseline is achieved. Feasible compensatory restoration actions exist to address injuries from this incident. Restoration actions that could be considered may include, but are not limited to: Replanting native wetland vegetation in appropriate areas, creation, enhancement or protection of marsh or other habitat with similar service flows, protection of endangered species, removal of dams and installation of fishways to enhance propagation of migratory fish, creation of oyster reef habitat, creation of submerged aquatic vegetation habitat, and creation of bird colony areas. Assessment procedures are available to evaluate the injuries and define the appropriate type and scale of restoration for the injured natural resources and services. Among these procedures are bird and marsh habitat injury assessment studies to be used in conjunction with the Resource Equivalency Analysis
(REA)and Habitat Equivalency Analysis (HEA), respectively, to determine compensation for injuries to birds and marsh habitats. Models, comparisons to observations of injury resulting from similar incidents, or other methodologies are available for evaluating injuries to the ecosystem. *Public Involvement:* Pursuant to 15 CFR 990.44(c), the trustees seek public involvement in restoration planning for this incident, through public review of and comments on the documents contained in the administrative record.. The record is on file at the NOAA Damage Assessment Center in Silver Spring, Maryland, and can be viewed electronically at: *http://www.darrp.noaa.gov/northeast/athos/index.html.* NOAA, as the Lead Administrative Trustee, and on behalf of the natural resource trustees of the [the other trustees], pursuant to the determinations made above and in accordance with 15 CFR 990.44(d), hereby provides this Notice of Intent to Conduct Restoration Planning and invites its participation in conducting the restoration planning for this incident. Dated: June 27, 2006. Ken Barton, Acting Director, Office of Response and Restoration, National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. [FR Doc. E6-10340 Filed 6-30-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-JE-P CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION OMB Approval Under the Paperwork Reduction Act; Standard for the Flammability (Open Flame) of Mattress Sets AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission. ACTION: Notice of OMB approval of collection of information. SUMMARY: This document announces the Office of Management and Budget's
(OMB)approval of the Commission's collection of information requirements contained in the Standard for the Flammability (Open Flame) of Mattress Sets, 16 CFR part 1633, under OMB Control No. 3041-0133. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda Glatz, Management and Program Analyst, at 301-504-7671, or e-mail at *lglatz@cpsc.gov* . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 15, 2006, the Consumer Product Safety Commission published in the **Federal Register** , 71 FR 13472, a standard for the flammability (open flame) of mattresses pursuant to section 4 of Flammable Fabrics Act, 15 U.S.C. 1193. The standard requires manufacturers (including importers) of mattress sets to perform testing and maintain records of their testing and quality assurance programs, effective July 1, 2007. The Commission submitted the proposed collection of information requirements to OMB for review as required under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520. On June 8, 2006, OBM approved the collection of information and issued Control Number 3041-0133, with an expiration date of June 30, 2009. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control number. We are providing this Notice to inform the public that the Commission has received OMB approval under Control Number 3041-0133. Dated: June 27, 2006. Todd A. Stevenson, Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission. [FR Doc. E6-10400 Filed 6-30-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6355-01-P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Office of the Secretary [No. DoD-2006-HA-0015] Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request ACTION: Notice. The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the following proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by August 2, 2006. *Title, Form and OMB Number:* TRICARE DoD/CHAMPUS Medical Claim Patient's Request for Medical Payment; DD Form 2642; OMB Control Number 0720-0006. *Type of Request:* Extension. *Number of Respondents:* 2,400,000. *Responses per Respondent:* 1. *Annual Responses:* 2,400,000. *Average Burden per Response:* 15 minutes. *Annual Burden Hours:* 600,000. *Needs and Uses:* The form is used solely by beneficiaries claiming reimbursement for medical expenses under the TRICARE Program. The information collected will be used by TRICARE/CHAMPUS to determine beneficiary eligibility, other health insurance liability, certification that the beneficiary received the case, and reimbursement for the medical services received. *Affected Public:* Individuals and households. *Frequency:* On occasion. *Respondent's Obligation:* Required to obtain or retain benefits. *OMB Desk Officer:* Mr. John Kraemer. Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information collection should be sent to Mr. Kraemer at the Office of Management and Budget, DoD Health Desk Officer, Room 10102, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503. You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and title, by the following method: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: *http://www.regulations.gov.* Follow the instructions for submitting comments. *Instructions:* All submissions received must include the agency name, docket number and title for this **Federal Register** document. The general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet at *http://www.regulations.gov* as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers or contact information. *DoD Clearance Officer:* Ms. Patricia Toppings. Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/Information Management Division, 1777 North Kent Street, RPN, Suite 11000, Arlington, VA 22209-2133. Dated: June 26, 2006. Patricia L. Toppings, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. [FR Doc. 06-5948 Filed 6-30-06; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 22
Traces to 22 documents
CFR
11 references not yet in our index
  • 291 F.3d 806
  • 366 F. Supp. 2d 1246
  • 110 F. Supp. 2d 992
  • 366 F. Supp. 2
  • 19 CFR 352.305(a)(3)
  • 40 CFR 300.600
  • 40 CFR 300.600(b)(2)
  • 40 CFR 300
  • 15 CFR 990
  • 16 CFR 1633
  • 44 USC 3501-3520
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice of opportunity to request administrative review of antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended investigation
C.F.R.§ 351.213
C.F.R.§ 351.221
C.F.R.§ 351.211
C.F.R.§ 351.218
C.F.R.§ 351.305
U.S.C.§ 1675
C.F.R.§ 351.103
C.F.R.§ 351.214
C.F.R.§ 351.402
F. App'x291 F.3d 806
F. Supp.366 F. Supp. 2d 1246
F. Supp.110 F. Supp. 2d 992
Cites 33 · showing 12Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.