Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2006-06-29 · Food and Drug Administration, HHS · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Notice of availability of guidance

4,545 words·~21 min read·/register/2006/06/29/06-5789

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration 21 CFR Parts 1 and 11 [Docket No. 2005D-0356] Guidance for Industry: Questions and Answers Regarding the Final Rule on Establishment and Maintenance of Records (Edition 3); Availability AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice of availability of guidance. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration
(FDA)is announcing the availability of a guidance entitled “Questions and Answers Regarding Establishment and Maintenance of Records (Edition 3).” The guidance responds to various questions raised about section 306 of the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002 (the Bioterrorism Act) and the agency's implementing regulation, which requires the establishment and maintenance of records by persons who manufacture, process, pack, transport, distribute, receive, hold, or import food in the United States. Such records are to allow for the identification of the immediate previous sources and the immediate subsequent recipients of food. Persons covered by the regulation who employ 500 or more full-time equivalent employees
(FTEs)had to be in compliance by December 9, 2005, and those who employ 11-499 FTEs had to be in compliance by June 9, 2006. Persons who employ 10 or fewer FTEs have until December 11, 2006 to be in compliance. “Person” includes an individual, partnership, corporation, and association. DATES: Submit written or electronic comments on the agency guidance at any time. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. 2005D-0356, by any of the following methods: *Electronic Submissions* Submit electronic comments in the following ways: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: *http://www.regulations.gov* . Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Agency Web site: *http://www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments* . Follow the instructions for submitting comments on the agency Web site. *Written Submissions* Submit written submissions in the following ways: • FAX: 301-827-6870. • Mail/Hand delivery/Courier [For paper, disk, or CD-ROM submissions]: Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. To ensure more timely processing of comments, FDA is no longer accepting comments submitted to the agency by e-mail. FDA encourages you to continue to submit electronic comments by using the Federal eRulemaking Portal or the agency Web site, as described in the *Electronic Submissions* portion of this paragraph. *Instructions* : All submissions received must include the agency name and Docket No(s). and Regulatory Information Number
(RIN)(if a RIN number has been assigned) for this rulemaking. All comments received may be posted without change to *http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/default.htm* , including any personal information provided. For additional information on submitting comments, see the “Comments” heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. *Docket* : For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to *http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/docket/default.htm* and insert the docket number(s), found in brackets in the heading of this document, into the “Search” box and follow the prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition at 1-888-SAFEFOOD, FAX: 1-877-366-3322, or by e-mail: *industry@fda.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background In the **Federal Register** of December 9, 2004 (69 FR 71562), FDA issued a final rule to implement section 306 of the Bioterrorism Act. The regulation requires the establishment and maintenance of records by persons who manufacture, process, pack, transport, distribute, receive, hold, or import food in the United States. Such records are to allow for the identification of the immediate previous sources and the immediate subsequent recipients of food. Persons subject to the regulation who employ 500 or more FTEs had to be in compliance by December 9, 2005, and those who employ 11-499 FTEs had to be in compliance by June 9, 2006. Persons who employ 10 or fewer FTEs have until December 11, 2006 to be in compliance. “Person” includes an individual, partnership, corporation, and association. On September 12, 2005, FDA issued the first edition of a guidance entitled “Questions and Answers Regarding Establishment and Maintenance of Records.” On November 22, 2005, FDA issued a second edition of that guidance. This document is the third edition of that guidance entitled “Questions and Answers Regarding Establishment and Maintenance of Records (Edition 3)” and responds to questions regarding persons covered by the regulation; persons excluded by the regulation, including additional guidance on the farm and restaurant exclusions; and what information is required in the records established and maintained by warehouse distribution facilities. It is intended to help the industry better understand and comply with the regulation in 21 CFR part 1, subpart J. FDA is issuing this guidance as a Level 1 guidance. The guidance represents the agency's current thinking on the topic. It does not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. Consistent with FDA's good guidance practices regulation § 10.115(g)(2) (21 CFR 10.115), the agency will accept comments, but it is implementing the guidance document immediately, in accordance with § 10.115(g)(2), because the agency has determined that prior public participation is not feasible or appropriate. As noted, persons who employ 500 or more FTEs had to begin to establish and maintain records identifying the immediate previous sources and immediate subsequent recipients of food by December 9, 2005, and those who employ 11-499 FTEs had to be in compliance by June 9, 2006. Persons who employ 10 or fewer FTEs have until December 11, 2006 to be in compliance. Clarifying the provisions of the final rule will facilitate prompt compliance with these requirements and complete the rule's implementation. FDA continues to receive large numbers of questions regarding the records final rule, and is responding to these questions under § 10.115 as promptly as possible, using a question-and-answer format. The agency believes that it is reasonable to maintain all responses to questions concerning establishment and maintenance of records in a single document that is periodically updated as the agency receives and responds to additional questions. The following four indicators will be employed to help users of this guidance identify revisions:
(1)The guidance will be identified as a revision of a previously issued document,
(2)the revision date of the guidance will appear on its cover,
(3)the edition number of the guidance will be included in its title, and
(4)questions and answers that have been added to the original guidance will be identified as such in the body of the guidance. II. Comments Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES ) written or electronic comments regarding the guidance at any time. Submit a single copy of electronic comments or two paper copies of any mailed comments, except that individuals may submit one paper copy. Comments are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments and the guidance may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. III. Electronic Access Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the guidance at *http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/guidance.html* or *http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/recguid3.html* Dated: June 22, 2006. Jeffrey Shuren, Assistant Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. E6-10239 Filed 6-28-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160-01-S DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service 26 CFR Part 1 [TD 9262] RIN 1545-BF57 Computer Software Under Section 199(c)(5)(B); Correction AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. ACTION: Correction to temporary regulations. SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to temporary regulations (TD 9262) that were published in the **Federal Register** on Thursday, June 1, 2006 (71 FR 31074) concerning the application of section 199 of the Internal Revenue Code, which provides a deduction for income attributable to domestic production activities, to certain transactions involving computer software. DATES: These corrections are effective June 1, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Handleman or Lauren Ross Taylor,
(202)622-3040 (not a toll-free number). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The correction notice that is the subject of this document is under section 199 of the Internal Revenue Code. Need for Correction As published, the correction notice (TD 9262) contains errors that may prove to be misleading and are in need of clarification. Correction of Publication Accordingly, the publication of the temporary regulations (TD 9262), which was the subject of FR Doc. 06-4828, is corrected as follows: 1. On page 31075, column 1, in the preamble, under the paragraph heading *“Qualified Production Activities Income,”* first paragraph of the column, line 3, the language “mean:
(A)Tangible personal property;” is corrected to read “mean:
(A)tangible personal property;”. 2. On page 31075, column 1, in the preamble, under the paragraph heading “Summary of Comments”, last paragraph of the column, line 16, the language “include:
(1)Whether an agreement” is corrected to read “include:
(1)whether an agreement”. 3. On page 31075, column 3, in the preamble, under the paragraph heading “Explanation of Provisions”, first paragraph of the column, line 11, the language “applies if a taxpayer that derives gross” is corrected to read “applies if a taxpayer derives gross”. 4. On page 31076, column 1, in the preamble, under the paragraph heading “Effective Date”, first paragraph of the column, line 4, the language “regulations expires on or before May 25,” is corrected to read “regulations expires on or before May 22,”. 5. On page 31077, column 2, in the signature block, the language “Mark E. Mathews,” is corrected to read “Mark E. Matthews,”. Guy R. Traynor, Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration). [FR Doc. E6-10248 Filed 6-28-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4830-01-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Occupational Safety and Health Administration 29 CFR Part 1952 Occupational Safety and Health of Contractor Employees at Certain Energy Department Sites; Jurisdiction and Enforcement Responsibilities; Clarification Regarding State Plans—Arizona, California, Iowa, Kentucky, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Utah, Virginia, Washington, and Wyoming AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), U.S. Department of Labor. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: This notice provides further clarification as to the jurisdiction and enforcement responsibilities of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and 14 of its approved State Plans at various Department of Energy
(DOE)sites which are not subject to the Atomic Energy Act (AEA). OSHA's regulations in 29 CFR 1952 are amended to reflect this jurisdiction, as appropriate. DATES: Effective Date: June 29, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information and press inquiries, contact Kevin Ropp, Director, Office of Communications, Room N-3647, OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone
(202)693-1999. For technical inquiries, contact Barbara Bryant, Director, Office of State Programs, Room N-3700, OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone
(202)693-2244. An electronic copy of this **Federal Register** notice is available on OSHA's *website at www.osha.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The U.S. Department of Labor
(DOL)and the U.S. Department of Energy
(DOE)previously clarified their regulatory authority over the occupational safety and health of private-sector contractor employees at a number of DOE government-owned or leased facilities that are not subject to the Atomic Energy Act (AEA). (65 FR 41492, July 5, 2000) Some of these facilities are either government-owned and government-operated
(GOGO)or government-owned and contractor-operated (GOCO). The Atomic Energy Act provides statutory authority to DOE to regulate occupational safety and health matters relating to private sector employees at facilities subject to the AEA. Section 4(b)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 29 U.S.C. (the Act), Section 653(b)(1), precludes OSHA coverage of working conditions over which other federal agencies have exercised statutory authority to prescribe or enforce standards for occupational safety or health. A 1992 Interagency Memorandum of Understanding provides that the Occupational Safety and Health Act shall not apply to government owned-contractor operated
(GOCO)sites or other facilities with private sector employees for which DOE, pursuant to the AEA, has exercised its authority to regulate occupational safety and health. By letter of June 18, 1999, and further clarified by letter on March 31, 2000, DOE provided OSHA with a list of DOE sites that were not covered by the AEA and requested OSHA's concurrence with DOE's views that the facilities and operations in question were subject to OSHA's jurisdiction. These sites are primarily involved in fossil fuel energy research and power marketing administration. OSHA responded by letter on July 13, 1999, agreeing with DOE that OSHA has jurisdiction over the working conditions of private sector employers and employees at such facilities. On July 5, 2000, OSHA published a notice in the **Federal Register** (65 FR 41492), listing these sites and stating that private sector employers and employees at these DOE facilities are subject to all standards, rules and requirements issued under the Occupational Safety and Health Act. The sites are: Department of Energy
(DOE)Non-Atomic Energy Act
(AEA)Sites and Facilities Western Area Power Administration Headquarters, P.O. Box 3402, Golden, CO 80401-0098, Covers all or part of the following States: AZ*, CA*, CO, IA*, KS, MN*, MT, NE, ND, NM*, NV*, SD, TX, UT*, WY* Southwestern Power Administration, Headquarters, P.O. Box 1619, Tulsa, OK 74101, Covers all or part of the following States: AR, KS, LA, MO, OK, TX Southeastern Power Administration, Headquarters, 2 South Public Square, Elberton, GA 30635, Covers all or part of the following States: AL, FL, GA, IL, KY*, MS, NC*, SC*, VA*, WV Bonneville Power Administration, 905 NE 11th Ave., P.O. Box 3621, Portland, OR 97208-3621, Covers all or part of the following States: CA*, ID, MT, NV*, OR*, UT*, WA*, WY* National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), 3610 Collins Ferry Road, P.O. Box 880, Morgantown, WV 26507-0880 National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), 626 Cochrans Mill Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15236-0940 Strategic Petroleum Reserves (SPR), Project Office, 900 Commerce Road East, New Orleans, LA 70123 National Petroleum Technology Office, Williams Center Tower 1, 1 West Third St., Suite 1400, Tulsa, OK 74103 Albany Research Center, 1450 Queen Ave., SW, Albany, OR* 97321-2198 Naval Petroleum & Oil Shale Reserves in CO, UT*, & WY*, 907 N. Poplar St., Suite 150, Casper, WY 82601 Naval Petroleum Reserves in California, 28590 Highway 119, P.O. Box 11, Tupman, CA* 93276 OSHA noted that a number of the non-AEA facilities are located in states which operate OSHA-approved state plans under Section 18 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 29 U.S.C 667 (noted with asterisk above), and which have primary authority for private sector occupational safety and health coverage in their states. However, pending a final determination, the state plan non-AEA sites were deemed “issues not covered by the state plan” and thus subject to federal enforcement jurisdiction. Federal OSHA would exercise enforcement jurisdiction over private sector employers and employees at the non-AEA sites located in state plan states, until it was determined whether a state would exercise jurisdiction. These determinations have now been made and this document provides notice that the affected states will assume occupational safety and health regulatory responsibility for all except five of the non-AEA sites in their states. The following State Plans intend to exercise jurisdiction over private contractors performing work at these non-AEA facilities and operations located in their states, except that federal employees and employees of private sector companies responsible for operating an entire facility under contract to DOE (contractor-operated facility) remain subject to federal OSHA jurisdiction. (Under the provisions of the Act and various interpretations by the courts, states with OSHA-approved state plans are precluded from exercising jurisdiction over federal employees or over federal instrumentalities such as government owned-contractor operated
(GOCO)facilities.) To the extent that a state should be unable to exercise jurisdiction over other private contractors at these sites, for whatever reason, OSHA will assume responsibility for coverage. Arizona—Western Area Power Administration 1 (Phoenix, AZ, *et al* ) 1 The Power Marketing Administrations operate in multiple states, with headquarters in Lakewood, Colorado (Western Area Power Administration), Portland, Oregon (Bonneville Power Administration), and Elberton, Georgia (Southeastern Power Administration). Power authority site locations in these state plan states are noted where available; in some states, Power Marketing Administration activity may be limited to power lines traversing the state with no site locations—but there may still be employee exposure to hazards during construction and maintenance operations. California—Western Area Power Administration, Bonneville Power Administration, Naval Petroleum Reserve (Tupman, CA) Iowa—Western Area Power Administration Kentucky—Southeastern Power Administration Minnesota—Western Area Power Administration Nevada—Western Area Power Administration, Bonneville Power Administration New Mexico—Western Area Power Administration (except Elephant Butte) North Carolina—Southeastern Power Administration Oregon—Bonneville Power Administration (Portland, OR, *et al* ) South Carolina—Southeastern Power Administration Utah—Western Area Power Administration, Bonneville Power Administration, activities at the site of the Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserve in Utah where divested by the Department of Energy Virginia—Southeastern Power Administration (except the Kerr-Philpott System) Washington—Bonneville Power Administration (Vancouver, WA, et al) (except in controlled areas of the Hanford Reservation) Wyoming—Western Area Power Administration, Bonneville Power Administration The following State Plans do not intend to exercise jurisdiction over private sector workers at the following non-AEA sites in their states. All employees at these DOE sites, both federal and private sector, remain subject to federal OSHA jurisdiction, so long as they remain facilities operated by the Department of Energy. If a site is divested by DOE, or otherwise transferred, private sector employees are subject to State Plan jurisdiction absent a further determination. New Mexico—Western Area Power Administration site at Elephant Butte Oregon—Albany Research Center in Albany, OR Utah—Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserve (if divested by DOE, coverage reverts to the state) Virginia—Southeastern Power Administration's Kerr-Philpott System Wyoming—Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserve Decision 29 CFR Part 1953 sets forth the procedures by which the Assistant Secretary will review changes to State Plans approved in accordance with Section 18(c) of the Act and Part 1902. Upon review of the 14 State Plan decisions to assert or decline jurisdiction, and in accordance with these procedures, OSHA hereby approves these actions and amends the subparts in 29 CFR Part 1952 for New Mexico (Western Area Power Administration at Elephant Butte), Oregon (Albany Research Center), Utah (Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserve), Virginia (Southeastern Power Administration's Kerr-Philpott System) and Wyoming (Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserve) to reflect the formal exclusion of these entities from the State Plan and continuation of federal jurisdiction over private sector contractor employees at these sites so long as they remain DOE sites not subject to the Atomic Energy Act. For all other listed facilities in states with OSHA-approved State Plans, this document provides notification to affected private sector employers and employees of these non-AEA sites that they will be subject to State Plan occupational safety and health jurisdiction like most other private sector employers in those States. Those States assuming jurisdiction over these private sector employers and employees will make available to them detailed information on the State's standards, regulations, procedures and practices, including differences from the Federal. Public Participation Under Section 29 CFR 1953.2(c), the Assistant Secretary may prescribe alternative procedures to expedite the review process or for other good cause which may be consistent with applicable laws. As these changes in jurisdiction generally impose no new responsibilities or requirements on employers or employees, no opportunity for public comment is required. Regulatory Flexibility Act OSHA certifies pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601 *et seq.* ) that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The change from federal to state jurisdiction for private contractors at these DOE non-AEA sites would not place small contractors at these sites under any significant new or different requirements. No additional burden will be placed upon the state governments beyond the responsibilities already assumed as part of the approved state plans. Federalism Executive Order 13132, “Federalism” (64 FR 43255, Aug. 10, 1999), emphasizes consultation between federal agencies and the states and establishes specific review procedures the federal government must follow as it carries out policies which affect state or local governments. OSHA has included in the Supplementary Information section of today's notice a general explanation of the relationship between federal OSHA and the state plan states under the Occupational Safety and Health Act. Although it appears that the specific consultation procedures provided under Section 6 of Executive Order 13132 are not mandatory for state plan jurisdiction changes because they neither impose a burden upon the state nor involve preemption of any state law, OSHA has nonetheless consulted extensively with these states on their individual decisions on these issues. OSHA has reviewed the decisions approved today and believes they are consistent with the principles and criteria set forth in the Executive Order. This document was prepared under the direction of Edwin G. Foulke, Jr., Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health. It is issued under Section 18 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 84 Stat. 1608 (29 U.S.C. 667); 29 CFR Part 1902; and Secretary of Labor's Order No. 5-2002 (67 FR 65008, Oct. 22, 2002). List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 1952 Intergovernmental relations, Law enforcement, Occupational safety and health, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Signed at Washington, DC, this 30th day of May, 2006. Edwin G. Foulke, Jr., Assistant Secretary. Part 1952 of 29 CFR is hereby amended as follows: PART 1952—[AMENDED] 1. The authority section for part 1952 continues to read as follows: Authority: Section 18 of the OSH Act (29 U.S.C. 667), 29 CFR part 1902, and Secretary of Labor's Order No. 5-2002 (67 FR 65008). Subpart D—Oregon 2. Amend § 1952.104 by revising the second sentence of paragraph
(b)to read as follows: § 1952.104 Final approval determination.
(b)* * * The plan does not cover private sector establishments on Indian reservations and tribal trust lands, including tribal and Indian-owned enterprises; employment at Crater Lake National Park; employment at the U.S. Department of Energy's Albany Research Center (ARC); Federal agencies; the U.S. Postal Service and its contractors; contractors on U.S. military reservations, except those working on U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dam construction projects; and private sector maritime employment on or adjacent to navigable waters, including shipyard operations and marine terminals. 3. Amend § 1952.105 by redesignating paragraph (b)(1)(v) as (b)(1)(vi) and adding a new paragraph (b)(1)(v), to read as follows: § 1952.105 Level of Federal enforcement. (b)(1) * * *
(v)Enforcement of occupational safety and health standards with regard to employment at the U.S. Department of Energy's Albany Research Center (ARC); Subpart E—Utah 4. Amend § 1952.114 by revising the second sentence of paragraph
(b)to read as follows: § 1952.114 Final approval determination.
(b)* * * The plan does not cover private sector maritime employment; employment on Hill Air Force Base; employment at the U.S. Department of Energy's Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserve, to the extent that it remains a U.S. DOE facility; Federal government employers and employees; the U.S. Postal Service (USPS), including USPS employees, and contract employees and contractor-operated facilities engaged in USPS mail operations; the enforcement of the field sanitation standard, 29 CFR 1928.110, and the enforcement of the temporary labor camps standard, 29 CFR 1910.142, with respect to any agricultural establishment where employees are engaged in “agricultural employment” within the meaning of the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act, 29 U.S.C. 1802(3), regardless of the number of employees, including employees engaged in hand packing of produce into containers, whether done on the ground, on a moving machine, or in a temporary packing shed, except that Utah retains enforcement responsibility over agricultural temporary labor camps for employees engaged in egg, poultry, or red meat production, or the post-harvest processing of agricultural or horticultural commodities. 5. Amend § 1952.115 by revising the fifth sentence of paragraph
(b)to read as follows: § 1952.115 Level of Federal enforcement.
(b)* * * Federal jurisdiction is also retained with regard to: all employment on the Hill Air Force Base; all employment at the U.S. Department of Energy's Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserve, to the extent that it remains a U.S. DOE facility; Federal government employers and employees; and the U.S. Postal Service (USPS), including USPS employees, and contract employees and contractor-operated facilities engaged in USPS mail operations. * * * Subpart BB—Wyoming 6. Amend § 1952.344 by revising the second sentence of paragraph
(b)to read as follows: § 1952.344 Final approval determination.
(b)* * * The plan does not cover private sector maritime employment; employment on the Warren Air Force Base; employment at the U.S. Department of Energy's Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserve; Federal government employers and employees; the U.S. Postal Service (USPS), including USPS employees, and contract employees and contractor-operated facilities engaged in USPS mail operations; the enforcement of the field sanitation standard, 29 CFR 1928.110, and the enforcement of the temporary labor camps standard, 29 CFR 1910.142, with respect to any agricultural establishment where employees are engaged in “agricultural employment” within the meaning of the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act, 29 U.S.C. 1802(3), regardless of the number of employees, including employees engaged in hand packing of produce into containers, whether done on the ground, on a moving machine, or in a temporary packing shed, except that Wyoming retains enforcement responsibility over agricultural temporary labor camps for employees engaged in egg, poultry, or red meat production, or the post-harvest processing of agricultural or horticultural commodities. 7. Amend § 1952.345 by revising the last sentence of paragraph (b)(1) to read as follows: § 1952.345 Level of Federal enforcement. (b)(1) * * * Federal jurisdiction is also retained for employment at Warren Air Force Base; employment at the U.S. Department of Energy's Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserve; Federal government employers and employees; and the U.S. Postal Service (USPS), including USPS employees, and contract employees and contractor-operated facilities engaged in USPS mail operations. Subpart DD—New Mexico 8. Amend § 1952.365 by revising paragraph (a)(9) to read as follows: § 1952.365 Level of Federal enforcement.
(a)* * *
(9)Enforcement of occupational safety and health standards with regard to employment at the U.S. Department of Energy's Western Area Power Administration site at Elephant Butte; Federal government employers and employees; and the U.S. Postal Service (USPS), including USPS employees and contract employees and contractor-operated facilities engaged in USPS mail operations; and Subpart EE—Virginia 9. Amend § 1952.374 by revising the second sentence of paragraph
(b)to read as follows: § 1952.374 Final approval determination.
(b)* * * The plan does not cover private sector maritime employment; worksites located within Federal military facilities as well as on other Federal enclaves where civil jurisdiction has been ceded by the State to the Federal government; employment at the U.S. Department of Energy's Southeastern Power Administration Kerr-Philpott System; Federal government employers and employees; and the U.S. Postal Service (USPS), including USPS employees, and contract employees and contractor-operated facilities engaged in USPS mail operations. 10. Amend § 1952.375 by revising the last sentence of paragraph (b)(1) to read as follows: § 1952.375 Level of Federal enforcement. (b)(1) * * * Federal jurisdiction is also retained with respect to employment at the U.S. Department of Energy's Southeastern Power Administration Kerr-Philpott System; Federal government employers and employees; and the U.S. Postal Service (USPS), including USPS employees, and contract employees and contractor-operated facilities engaged in USPS mail operations. [FR Doc. 06-5789 Filed 6-28-06; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 8
7 references not yet in our index
  • 21 CFR 1
  • 26 CFR 1
  • T.D. 9262
  • 29 CFR 1952
  • 29 CFR 1953
  • 84 Stat. 1608
  • 29 CFR 1902
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Notice of availability of guidance
Cite21 CFR 1
Cite26 CFR 1
Treas. Dec.T.D. 9262
Cite29 CFR 1952
Cites 15 · showing 12Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.