Notices. Notice; request for comments

8,642 words·~39 min read·/register/2006/06/16/06-5464

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Highway Administration [FHWA Docket No. FHWA-2006-24902] Preliminary List of Nationally and Exceptionally Significant Features of the Federal Interstate Highway System AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT. ACTION: Notice; request for comments. SUMMARY: The FHWA is seeking public input on preliminary list of elements to be excluded from exemptions of the Interstate Highway System from consideration as historic property under the provisions of section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966. 1 This list is available at *http://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/histpres/index.asp.* This notice contains a link to and the process for interested members of the public to comment on the preliminary list of elements to be excluded from the respective exemptions of the Interstate Highway System from consideration as historic property under the authorities cited above.

Comments received from the public will be factored into development of a final list of exceptional elements of the Interstate System. 1 Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966 was technically repealed in 1983 when it was codified without substantive change at 49 U.S.C. 303. A provision with the same meaning is found at 23 U.S.C. 138 and applies only to FHWA actions. We continue to refer to section 4(f) as such because it would create needless confusion to do otherwise; the policies section 4(f) engendered are widely referred to as “Section 4(f)” matters.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 17, 2006. ADDRESSES: Mail or hand deliver comments to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Dockets Management Facility, Room PL-401, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590, or submit electronically at *http://dms.dot.gov* or fax comments to

(202)493-2251. All comments should include the docket number that appears in the heading of this document. All comments received will be available for examination and copying at the above address from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Those desiring notification of receipt of comments must include a self-addressed, stamped postcard or may print the acknowledgment page that appears after submitting comments electronically. Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). Persons making comments may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the **Federal Register** published on April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70, Pages 19477-78), or may visit *http://dems.dot.gov.* FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: MaryAnn Naber, HEPE,

(202)366-2060; Federal Highway Administration; 400 7th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590; Harold Aikens, Office of the Chief Counsel, HCC-30,

(202)366-0791; Federal Highway Administration, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours are from 7:45 a.m. to 4:15 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Electronic Access and Filing You may submit or retrieve online through the Document Management system

(DMS)at: *http://dmses.dot.gov/submit.* The DMS is available 24-hours each day, 365 days each year. Electronic submission and retrieval help and guidelines are available under the help section of the Web site. An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded by using the Internet to reach the Office of the Federal Register's home page at *http://www.archives.gov* and the Government Printing Office's Web site at *http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara.* I. Background Section 106 requires that Federal agencies take into account the effect of their actions on historic properties and afford the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation

(ACHP)an opportunity to comment on those effects. Historic properties are defined as those either listed on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (National Register). 2 Section 4(f) mandates that DOT agencies may not use historic sites, among other protected resources, unless there is no prudent and feasible alternative. As the Dwight D. Eisenhower National System of Interstate and Defense Highways (Interstate System) approached the 50th Anniversary, some of its elements were already at least 50 years of age and large sections would soon be achieving that mark at which resources are often evaluated for historic significance. The potential for vast sections of the Interstate System to be considered historic raised the issue of an overwhelming administrative burden for the myriad routine undertakings affecting the Interstate System, even for basic maintenance and improvements. Accordingly, on February 18, 2005, the ACHP adopted the Section 106 Exemption Regarding Effects to the Interstate Highway System. 3 This exemption effectively excludes the majority of the 46,700-mile Interstate System from consideration as a historic property under section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). In addition, the recently enacted Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) re-authorization legislation (Pub. L. 109-59, August 10, 2005) includes a provision (Section 6007) that exempts the bulk of the Interstate Highway System from consideration as a historic property under section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act. With these two exemptions in place, all Federal agencies are no longer required to consider the vast majority of the Interstate Highway System as historic property under section 106 and section 4(f) requirements. 2 The National Register of Historic Places is the Nation's official list of cultural resources worthy of preservation. Authorized under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, the National Register is part of a national program to coordinate and support public and private efforts to identify, evaluate, and protect our historic and archeological resources. Properties listed in the Register include districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that are significant in American history, architecture, engineering, and culture. The National Park Service administers the National Register. 3 The ACHP's approved exemption was published in the **Federal Register** on March 10, 2005, at 70 FR 11928. Highways comprising the Interstate Highway System are denoted by the official red, white, and blue, or green and white in Alaska, Interstate Highway System shield. 4 All facilities within the right-of-way of these highways (e.g., road bed, engineering features, bridges, tunnels, rest stops, interchanges, off-ramps, on-ramps, etc.) are considered to be part of the Interstate Highway System. Other highways (e.g., U.S. routes, State routes, etc.) not designated with the official shield are not part of the Interstate Highway System, and therefore are not eligible for either exemption. 4 See Section 2D.11 of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) for more information about the design of route signs. The MUTCD is available at the following URL: *http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/pdfs/2003/pdf.index.htm.* Under Section II of the ACHP's section 106 exemption, certain elements of the Interstate Highway System, such as bridges, tunnels, and rest stops, shall be excluded from the exemption's provisions if they have national and/or exceptional historic significance. Section III of the ACHP's section 106 exemption sets forth the criteria by which the FHWA shall identify these elements in consultation with stakeholders in each State. Section 6007 of SAFETEA-LU (codified at 23 U.S.C. 103(c)(5)) adopts by reference the same process for identifying exclusions to the section 4(f) exemption. Elements identified for exclusion will continue to be subject to the requirements of sections 106 and 4(f). It does not mean that the excluded facilities cannot be modernized, rehabilitated, expanded or replaced after appropriate consideration under the aforementioned statutes. II. Process The ACHP's section 106 exemption directed FHWA, at the headquarters level, to work with stakeholders at the State and local levels, to compile a list of excluded elements prior to the 50th Anniversary of the Interstate Highway System on June 29, 2006. The criteria set forth in the language of the respective exemptions were used to guide the process of identifying Interstate Highway System elements that should remain subject to section 106 and 4(f) requirements. Also, to assist in the process, the FHWA commissioned preparation of a historic context report for the Interstate Highway System (Interstate Historic Context Report). This report provides a detailed history of the evolution, development of design standards, and construction of the Interstate Highway System. It explains how the Interstate Highway System is significant within the areas of engineering, transportation, social history, and commerce, and it provides some specific examples of elements that are important within these areas. The draft context report is available at: *http://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/histpres/index.asp.* III. Exclusion Criteria Individual elements that are excluded from the exemptions may include bridges, tunnels, rest areas, medians, interchanges, ramps, highway segments, culverts, pedestrian overcrossings, lookout sites, visitor centers, retaining walls, signage, lighting, toll booths, and landscaping that are part of the Interstate Highway System. Elements must possess adequate integrity to convey their importance within the appropriate area(s) of significance: Engineering, transportation, social history, or commerce. In addition, per Section III of the ACHP's section 106 exemption, elements must meet at least one of the following criteria: 1. *National Significance.* The element is at least 50 years old and meets the National Register criteria 5 for national significance as defined in 36 CFR 65.4. In particular, the quality of national significance is ascribed to resources that possess exceptional value or quality in illustrating or interpreting the heritage of the United States in history, architecture, archeology, engineering, and culture and that possess a high degree of integrity. 5 Information on the National Register standards for evaluating the significance of properties and its criteria for listing may be found at the following URL: *http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/listing.htm.* 2. *Exceptional Significance.* The element is less than 50 years old and meets the National Register criteria consideration for exceptional importance. The first step in evaluating properties of recent significance is to identify the appropriate area(s) of significance: engineering, transportation, social history, or commerce. Then, deliberate and distinct justification for the “exceptional importance” of the resource must be made. The phrase “exceptional importance” may be applied to the element's extraordinary impact on an event or for the quality of its design or because it may be one of very few survivors of a resource type. Standard design elements, by their very nature, are not exceptional. 3. *Listed or Determined Eligible by the Keeper.* The element is listed in the National Register or has previously been determined eligible by the Keeper of the National Register. 4. *State or Local Significance.* At the discretion of the FHWA, elements may be included in the list of excluded elements if they are at least 50 years old, were later incorporated into the Interstate Highway System, and meet the National Register criteria for evaluation as defined in 36 CFR 60.4 at the State or local level of significance. IV. Methodology The FHWA identified exceptional elements for the preliminary list by soliciting input and conducting facilitated meetings with key representatives from each State and the District of Columbia. The details of this process are described in the following paragraphs. Points of contact from the FHWA Division Offices, Departments of Transportation (DOTs), and State Historic Preservation Offices (SHPOs) were identified within each of the 50 States and the District of Columbia. Where possible, contacts also were identified within organizations capable of providing additional information relevant to this process (e.g., facility owners, local, State, or national road-related historical groups). Guidance materials for applying the criteria detailed above were prepared and distributed to the points of contact identified within each State. These materials included representative examples of property types and individual historic elements. After distributing the guidance materials and appropriate background information to each State's “team” of representatives, FHWA held State-by-State conference calls, inviting pertinent points of contact identified within each State to participate. These calls were facilitated by qualified cultural resource management specialists and were intended to:

(a)Ensure that all team members understood the details of the exemptions and the criteria for identifying potentially significant elements; and

(b)provide a forum for brainstorming for potential elements within the State that merited consideration for exclusion. In cases where all points of contact were not able to participate in the initial conference call, absent individuals were contacted separately by phone and provided with meeting minutes to keep them apprised of the project and any relevant discussions. Following the initial round of 51 conference calls, each State team was given several weeks to collaborate and determine whether there was consensus on a list of elements to be excluded from the exemptions. As necessary, the FHWA provided support to conduct limited research on potentially significant elements. Teams were asked to provide the FHWA with standardized information for each of the resources identified in their lists including, location (Interstate number and milepost and/or crossing), name of resource, property type, year(s) of construction, level of significance (national, State, or local), and nature of significance for inclusion in the list. In addition, teams were asked to provide brief justifications of significance for each element on the list. As expected by the FHWA, some States were unable to identify any Interstate Highway System elements that strongly convey a particular area of significance at a level of exceptional or national importance. V. Public Participation Based on the lists submitted by each State, the FHWA compiled a preliminary national list of elements to be excluded from the exemptions. This draft list is available at the following URL: *http://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/histpres/index.asp.* Through public input and stakeholder involvement, the FHWA intends to refine the preliminary list of exceptional Interstate System elements. The draft list will be e-mailed to all stakeholders who participated in the process of identifying historic elements, as well as any additional individuals or organizations identified by the FHWA Division Offices, State DOTs, and SHPOs as having an interest. The FHWA is interested in feedback concerning the following specific aspects of the preliminary list: • Whether it should include additional elements, which would continue to be considered as historic properties under the provisions of section 106 and section 4(f). • Whether certain sites should be excluded from the final list based on application of the stated criteria. Considerable stakeholder input has already been received and taken into consideration in developing this preliminary list. In addition, the section 106 exemption, which was previously published in the **Federal Register** and subject to public comments, requires the FHWA to designate, by June 30, 2006, individual elements on the Interstate System that will continue to be considered under section 106. Accordingly, the FHWA believe that a 30-day comment period for input from the general public at this time is deemed to be adequate. Commenters should submit comments as indicated above under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION . Authority: 23 U.S.C. 103(c)(5)(B); Sec. 6007, Public Law 109-59. Issued on: June 12, 2006. J. Richard Capka, Federal Highway Administrator. [FR Doc. E6-9454 Filed 6-15-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-22-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Railroad Administration Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration, DOT. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and its implementing regulations, the Federal Railroad Administration

(FRA)hereby announces that it is seeking renewal of the following currently approved information collection activities. Before submitting these information collection requirements for clearance by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), FRA is soliciting public comment on specific aspects of the activities identified below. DATES: Comments must be received no later than August 15, 2006. ADDRESSES: Submit written comments on any or all of the following proposed activities by mail to either: Mr. Robert Brogan, Office of Safety, Planning and Evaluation Division, RRS-21, Federal Railroad Administration, 1120 Vermont Ave., NW., Mail Stop 25, Washington, DC 20590, or Mr. Victor Angelo, Office of Support Systems, RAD-43, Federal Railroad Administration, 1120 Vermont Ave., NW., Mail Stop 35, Washington, DC 20590. Commenters requesting FRA to acknowledge receipt of their respective comments must include a self-addressed stamped postcard stating, “Comments on OMB control number______.” Alternatively, comments may be transmitted via facsimile to

(202)493-6230 or

(202)493-6170, or e-mail to Mr. Brogan at *robert.brogan@dot.gov* , or to Mr. Angelo at *victor.angelo@dot.gov.* Please refer to the assigned OMB control number in any correspondence submitted. FRA will summarize comments received in response to this notice in a subsequent notice and include them in its information collection submission to OMB for approval. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Robert Brogan, Office of Planning and Evaluation Division, RRS-21, Federal Railroad Administration, 1120 Vermont Ave., NW., Mail Stop 25, Washington, DC 20590 (telephone:

(202)493-6292) or Victor Angelo, Office of Support Systems, RAD-43, Federal Railroad Administration, 1120 Vermont Ave., NW., Mail Stop 35, Washington, DC 20590 (telephone:

(202)493-6470). (These telephone numbers are not toll-free.) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public Law 104-13, § 2, 109 Stat. 163

(1995)(codified as revised at 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), and its implementing regulations, 5 CFR part 1320, require Federal agencies to provide 60-days notice to the public for comment on information collection activities before seeking approval for reinstatement or renewal by OMB. 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A); 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1), 1320.10(e)(1), 1320.12(a). Specifically, FRA invites interested respondents to comment on the following summary of proposed information collection activities regarding

(i)whether the information collection activities are necessary for FRA to properly execute its functions, including whether the activities will have practical utility;

(ii)the accuracy of FRA's estimates of the burden of the information collection activities, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used to determine the estimates;

(iii)ways for FRA to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information being collected; and

(iv)ways for FRA to minimize the burden of information collection activities on the public by automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology ( *e.g.* , permitting electronic submission of responses). *See* 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)(i)-(iv); 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1)(i)-(iv). FRA believes that soliciting public comment will promote its efforts to reduce the administrative and paperwork burdens associated with the collection of information mandated by Federal regulations. In summary, FRA reasons that comments received will advance three objectives:

(i)Reduce reporting burdens;

(ii)ensure that it organizes information collection requirements in a “user friendly” format to improve the use of such information; and

(iii)accurately assess the resources expended to retrieve and produce information requested. *See* 44 U.S.C. 3501. Below are brief summaries of the three currently approved information collection activities that FRA will submit for clearance by OMB as required under the PRA: *Title:* State Safety Participation Regulations and Remedial Actions. *OMB Control Number:* 2130-0509. *Abstract:* The collection of information is set forth under 49 CFR part 212, and requires qualified state inspectors to provide various reports to FRA for monitoring and enforcement purposes concerning state investigative, inspection, and surveillance activities regarding railroad compliance with Federal railroad safety laws and regulations. Additionally, railroads are required to report to FRA actions taken to remedy certain alleged violations of law. *Form Number(s):* FRA F 6180.33/61/67/96/96A/109/110/111/112. *Affected Public:* Businesses. *Respondent Universe:* States and Railroads. *Reporting Burden:* CFR Section Respondent universe Total annual responses Average time per response (hours) Total annual burden hours Total annual burden cost Application For Participation 15 States 15 updates 2.5 38 $1,748 Training Funding Agreement 30 States 30 agreements 1 30 1,380 Inspector Training Reimbursement 30 States 300 vouchers 1 300 12,600 Annual Work Plan 30 States 30 reports 15 450 20,700 Inspection Form (Form FRA F 6180.96) 30 States 18,000 forms 0.25 4,500 189,000 Violation Report—Motive, Power, and Equipment Regulations (Form FRA F 6180.109) 19 States 200 reports 4 800 33,600 Violation Report—Operating Practices Regulations (Form FRA F 6180.67) 13 States 40 reports 4 160 6,720 Violation Report—Hazardous Materials Regulations (Form FRA F 6180.110) 14 States 100 reports 4 400 16,800 Violation Report— Hours of Service Law (F 6180.33) 13 States 21 reports 4 84 3,528 Violation Report—Accident/Incident Reporting Rules (Form FRA F 6180.61) 17 States 10 reports 4 40 1,680 Violation Report—Track Safety Regulations (Form FRA F 6180.111) 17 States 158 reports 4 632 26,544 Violation Report—Signal and Train Control Regulations (Form FRA F 6180.112) 17 States 100 reports 4 400 16,800 Remedial Actions Reports 573 Railroads 5,048 reports 0.25 1,262 80,768 Violation Report Challenge 573 Railroads 1,010 challenges 1 1,010 64,640 Delayed Reports 573 Railroads 505 reports 0.5 253 16,192 *Total Responses:* 25,567. *Estimated Total Annual Burden:* 10,359 hours. *Status:* Extension of a currently approved collection. *Title:* Certification of Glazing Materials. *OMB Control Number:* 2130-0525. *Abstract:* The collection of information is set forth under 49 CFR part 223, which requires the certification and permanent marking of glazing materials by the manufacturer. The manufacturer is also responsible for making available test verification data to railroads and FRA upon request. *Form Number(s):* N/A. *Affected Public:* Businesses. *Respondent Universe:* 5 Manufacturers. *Reporting Burden:* CFR Section Respondent universe Total annual responses Average time per response (hours) Total annual burden hours Total annual burden cost 223.17—Identification of Equipped Locomotives, Passenger Cars, and Cabooses—Stenciling 4 Manufacturers 200 stencilings 0.25 50 $1,500 223.17—Appendix A—Requests for Glazing Certification Information 5 Manufacturers 10 requests 0.25 3 90 —Material Identification: Marked Units of Glazing 5 Manufacturers 25,000 pieces 0.002 52 1,560 —New Manufacturers: Testing and Verification Data 5 Manufacturers 1 Test 14 14 *Total Responses:* 25,211. *Estimated Total Annual Burden:* 119 hours. *Status:* Extension of a currently approved collection. *Title:* Hours of Service Regulations. *OMB Control Number:* 2130-0005. *Abstract:* The collection of information is due to the railroad hours of service regulations set forth in 49 CFR part 228 which require railroads to collect the hours of duty for covered employees, and records of train movements. Railroads whose employees have exceeded maximum duty limitations must report the circumstances. Also, a railroad that has developed plans for construction or reconstruction of sleeping quarters (subpart C of 49 CFR part 228) must obtain approval of the Federal Railroad Administration

(FRA)by filing a petition conforming to the requirements of sections 228.101, 228.103, and 228.105. *Form Number(s):* FRA F 6180.3. *Affected Public:* Businesses. *Respondent Universe:* 687 railroads. *Frequency of Submission:* On occasion. *Reporting Burden:* CFR Section Respondent universe Total annual responses Average time per response (hours) Total annual burden hours Total annual burden cost 228.11—Hours of Duty Records 632 railroads 27,375,000 recds. 0.033/0.167 2,962,500 $103,687,500 228.17—Dispatchers of Train Movements 150 Dispatch Offices 54,750 records 6 328,500 11,497,500 228.19—Monthly Reports of Excess Service 300 railroads 1,800 reports 2 3,600 126,000 228.103—Construction of Employee Sleeping Quarters 632 railroads 1 petition 16 16 560 45 U.S.C. 61-641—Hours of Service Act 15 railroads 12 petitions 10 120 4,200 *Total Responses:* 27,431,563. *Estimated Total Annual Burden:* 3,294,736 hours. Pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 3507(a) and 5 CFR 1320.5(b), 1320.8(b)(3)(vi), FRA informs all interested parties that it may not conduct or sponsor, and a respondent is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520. Issued in Washington, DC on June 12, 2006. D.J. Stadlter, Director, Office of Budget, Federal Railroad Administration. [FR Doc. E6-9402 Filed 6-15-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-06-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Railroad Administration Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration, DOT. ACTION: Notice and request for comments. SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.* ), this notice announces that the Information Collection Requirements

(ICRs)abstracted below have been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget

(OMB)for review and comment. The ICRs describes the nature of the information collections and their expected burdens. The **Federal Register** notice with a 60-day comment period soliciting comments on the following collections of information was published on April 7, 2006 (71 FR 17945). DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before July 17, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Robert Brogan, Office of Planning and Evaluation Division, RRS-21, Federal Railroad Administration, 1120 Vermont Ave., NW., Mail Stop 17, Washington, DC 20590 (telephone:

(202)493-6292), or Victor Angelo, Office of Support Systems, RAD-43, Federal Railroad Administration, 1120 Vermont Ave., NW., Mail Stop 35, Washington, DC 20590 (telephone:

(202)493-6470). (These telephone numbers are not toll-free.) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public Law 104-13, § 2, 109 Stat. 163

(1995)(codified as revised at 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), and its implementing regulations, 5 CFR part 1320, require Federal agencies to issue two notices seeking public comment on information collection activities before OMB may approve paperwork packages. 44 U.S.C. 3506, 3507; 5 CFR 1320.5, 1320.8(d)(1), 1320.12. On April 7, 2006, FRA published a 60-day notice in the **Federal Register** soliciting comment on ICRs that the agency was seeking OMB approval. 71 FR 17945. FRA received no comments after issuing this notice. Accordingly, DOT announces that these information collection activities have been re-evaluated and certified under 5 CFR 1320.5(a) and forwarded to OMB for review and approval pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.12(c). Before OMB decides whether to approve these proposed collections of information, it must provide 30 days for public comment. 44 U.S.C. 3507(b); 5 CFR 1320.12(d). Federal law requires OMB to approve or disapprove paperwork packages between 30 and 60 days after the 30 day notice is published. 44 U.S.C. 3507(b)-(c); 5 CFR 1320.12(d); *see also* 60 FR 44978, 44983, August 29, 1995. OMB believes that the 30 day notice informs the regulated community to file relevant comments and affords the agency adequate time to digest public comments before it renders a decision. 60 FR 44983, August 29, 1995. Therefore, respondents should submit their respective comments to OMB within 30 days of publication to best ensure having their full effect. 5 CFR 1320.12(c); *see also* 60 FR 44983, August 29, 1995. The summaries below describes the nature of the information collection requirements

(ICRs)and the expected burden. The proposed requirements are being submitted for clearance by OMB as required by the PRA. *Title:* Railroad Signal System Requirements. *OMB Control Number:* 2130-0006. *Type of Request:* Extension of a currently approved collection. *Affected Public:* Railroads. *Form(s):* FRA F 6180.14; FRA F 6180.47. *Abstract:* The regulations pertaining to railroad signal systems are contained in 49 CFR parts 233 (Signal System Reporting Requirements), 235 (Instructions Governing Applications for Approval of a Discontinuance or Material Modification of a Signal System), and 236 (Rules,Standards, and Instructions Governing the Installation, Inspection, Maintenance, and Repair of Systems, Devices, and Appliances). Section 233.5 provides that each railroad must report to FRA within 24 hours after learning of an accident or incident arising from the failure of a signal appliance, device, method, or system to function or indicate as required by part 236 of this title that results in a more favorable aspect than intended or other condition hazardous to the movement of a train. Section 233.7 sets forth the specific requirements for reporting signal failures within 15 days in accordance with the instructions printed on Form FRA F 6180.14. Finally, section 233.9 sets forth the specific requirements for the “Signal System Five Year Report.” It requires that every five years each railroad must file a signal system status report. The report is to be prepared on a form issued by FRA in accordance with the instructions and definitions provided. Title 49, part 235 of the Code of Federal Regulations, sets forth the specific conditions under which FRA approval of modification or discontinuance of railroad signal systems is required and prescribes the methods available to seek such approval. The application process prescribed under part 235 provides a vehicle enabling FRA to obtain the necessary information to make logical and informed decisions concerning carrier requests to modify or discontinue signaling systems. Section 235.5 requires railroads to apply for FRA approval to discontinue or materially modify railroad signaling systems. Section 235.7 defines material modifications” and identifies those changes that do not require agency approval. Section 235.8 provides that any railroad may petition FRA to seek relief from the requirements under 49 CFR part 236. Sections 235.10, 235.12, and 235.13 describe where the petition must be submitted, what information must be included, the organizational format, and the official authorized to sign the application. Section 235.20 sets forth the process for protesting the granting of a carrier application for signal changes or relief from the rules, standards, and instructions. This section provides the information that must be included in the protest, the address for filing the protest, the item limit for filing the protest, and the requirement that a person requesting a public hearing explain the need for such a forum. Section 236.110 requires that the test results of certain signaling apparatus be recorded and specifically identify the tests required under sections 236.102-109; sections 236.377 to 236.387; sections 236.576, 236.577; and section 236.586-236.589. Section 236.110 further provides that the test results must be recorded on preprinted or computerized forms provided by the carrier and that the forms show the name of the railroad; place and date of the test conducted; equipment tested; tests results; repairs; and the condition of the apparatus. This section also requires that the employee conducting the test must sign the form and that the record be retained at the office of the supervisory official having the proper authority. Results of tests made in compliance with section 236.587 must be retained for 92 days, and results of all other tests must be retained until the next record is filed, but in no case less than one year. Additionally, section 236.587 requires each railroad to make a departure test of cab signal, train stop, or train control devices on locomotives before that locomotive enters the equipped territory. This section further requires that whoever performs the test must certify in writing that the test was properly performed. The certification and test results must be posted in the locomotive cab with a copy of the certification and test results retained at the office of the supervisory official having the proper authority. However, if it is impractical to leave a copy of the certification and test results at the location of the test, the test results must be transmitted to either the dispatcher or one other designated official, who must keep a written record of the test results and the name of the person performing the test. All records prepared under this section are required to be retained for 92 days. Finally, section 236.590 requires the carrier to clean and inspect the pneumatic apparatus of automatic train stop, train control, or cab signal devices on locomotives every 736 days, and to stencil, tag, or otherwise mark the pneumatic apparatus indicating the last cleaning date. *Annual Estimated Burden Hours:* 480,988 hours. *Title:* Remotely Controlled Switch Operations. *OMB Control Number:* 2130-0516. *Type of Request:* Extension of a currently approved collection. *Affected Public:* Railroads. *Form(s):* None. *Abstract:* Title 49, section 218.30 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), ensures that remotely controlled switches are lined to protect workers who are vulnerable to being struck by moving cars as they inspect or service equipment on a particular track or, alternatively, occupy camp cars. FRA believes that production of notification requests promotes safety by minimizing mental lapses of workers who are simultaneously handling several tasks. Sections 218.30 and 218.67 require the operator of remotely controlled switches to maintain a record of each notification requesting blue signal protection for 15 days. Operators of remotely controlled switches use the information as a record documenting blue signal protection of workers or camp cars. This record also serves as a valuable resource for railroad supervisors and FRA inspectors monitoring regulatory compliance. *Annual Estimated Burden Hours:* 120,153 hours. *Title:* Disqualification Proceedings. *OMB Control Number:* 2130-0529. *Type of Request:* Extension of a currently approved collection. *Affected Public:* Railroads. *Form(s):* None. *Abstract:* Under 49 U.S.C. 20111(c), FRA is authorized to issue orders disqualifying railroad employees, including supervisors, managers, and other agents, from performing safety-sensitive service in the rail industry for violations of safety rules, regulations, standards, orders, or laws evidencing unfitness. FRA's regulations, 49 CFR part 209, subpart D, implement the statutory provision by requiring

(i)a railroad employing or formerly employing a disqualified individual to disclose the terms and conditions of a disqualification order to the individual's new or prospective employing railroad;

(ii)a railroad considering employing an individual in a safety-sensitive position to ask the individual's previous employing railroad whether the individual is currently serving under a disqualification order; and

(iii)a disqualified individual to inform his new or prospective employer of the disqualification order and provide a copy of the same. Additionally, the regulations prohibit a railroad from employing a person serving under a disqualification order to work in a safety-sensitive position. This information serves to inform a railroad whether an employee or prospective employee is currently disqualified from performing safety-sensitive service based on the issuance of a disqualification order by FRA. Furthermore, it prevents an individual currently serving under a disqualification order from retaining and obtaining employment in a safety-sensitive position in the rail industry. *Annual Estimated Burden Hours:* 5 hours. *Addressee:* Send comments regarding these information collections to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 Seventeenth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503, Attention: FRA Desk Officer. *Comments are invited on the following:* Whether the proposed collections of information are necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Department, including whether the information will have practical utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimates of the burden of the proposed information collections; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize the burden of the collections of information on respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. A comment to OMB is best assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication of this notice in the **Federal Register** . Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520. Issued in Washington, DC on June 12, 2006. D.J. Stadtler, Director, Office of Budget, Federal Railroad Administration. [FR Doc. E6-9404 Filed 6-15-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-06-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration [Docket No. NHTSA-2006-24965] Notice of Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming 2006 Mercedes Benz Type 463 Short Wheel Base Gelaendewagen Multipurpose Passenger Vehicles Manufactured Before September 1, 2006 Are Eligible for Importation AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT. ACTION: Notice of receipt of petitions for decision that nonconforming 2006 Mercedes Benz Type 463 Short Wheel Base Gelaendewagen multipurpose passenger vehicles manufactured before September 1, 2006 are eligible for importation. SUMMARY: This document announces receipt by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a petition for a decision that 2006 Mercedes Benz Type 463 Short Wheel Base

(SWB)Gelaendewagen Multipurpose Passenger Vehicles

(MPVs)manufactured before September 1, 2006 that were not originally manufactured to comply with all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards (FMVSS) are eligible for importation into the United States because they have safety features that comply with, or are capable of being altered to comply with, all such standards. DATES: The closing date for comments on the petitions is July 17, 2006. ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to the docket number and notice number, and be submitted to: Docket Management, Room PL-401, 400 Seventh St., SW., Washington, DC 20590. [Docket hours are from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.]. Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the **Federal Register** published on April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477-78) or you may visit *http://dms.dot.gov* . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Coleman Sachs, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, NHTSA (202-366-3151). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(B), a motor vehicle that was not originally manufactured to conform to all applicable FMVSS, and has no substantially similar U.S.-certified counterpart, shall be refused admission into the United States unless NHTSA has decided that the motor vehicle has safety features that comply with, or are capable of being altered to comply with, all applicable FMVSS based on destructive test data or such other evidence as NHTSA decides to be adequate. Petitions for eligibility decisions may be submitted by either manufacturers or importers who have registered with NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR part 592. As specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA publishes notice in the **Federal Register** of each petition that it receives, and affords interested persons an opportunity to comment on the petition. At the close of the comment period, NHTSA decides, on the basis of the petition and any comments that it has received, whether the vehicle is eligible for importation. The agency then publishes this decision in the **Federal Register** . J.K. Technologies, L.L.C., of Baltimore, Maryland (J.K.) (Registered Importer 09-006) petitioned NHTSA to decide whether 2006 Mercedes Benz Type 463 SWB Gelaendewagen MPVs manufactured before September 1, 2006 are eligible for importation into the United States. J.K. believes that these vehicles can be made to conform to all applicable FMVSS. In its petition, J.K. noted that NHTSA has granted import eligibility to the 2004 Mercedes Benz 463 SWB Gelaendewagen MPV (covered by vehicle eligibility number VCP-28), which it claims is identical to the 2006 Mercedes Benz Type 463 SWB Gelaendewagen MPV manufactured before September 1, 2006. Because the 2004 model year vehicles that have been deemed eligible for importation under vehicle eligibility number VCP-28 include both the Cabriolet and the Three Door versions of the Mercedes Benz 463 SWB Gelaendewagen MPV, the agency regards the instant petition as pertaining to those versions as well. In the petition for the 2004 model, the petitioner observed that over a period of ten years, NHTSA has granted import eligibility to a number of Mercedes Benz Gelaendewagen 463 vehicles. These include the 1990-1994 SWB version of the vehicle (assigned vehicle eligibility number VCP-14) and the 1996 through 2001 long wheel base

(LWB)version of the vehicle (assigned vehicle eligibility numbers VCP-11, VCP-15, VCP-16, VCP-18, and VCP-21). These eligibility decisions were based on petitions submitted by J.K. and another register importer, Europa International, Inc., of Santa Fe, New Mexico (Registered Importer 91-206), claiming that the vehicles are capable of being altered to comply with all applicable FMVSS. Because those vehicles were not manufactured for importation into and sale in the United States, and were not certified by their original manufacturer (Daimler Benz), as conforming to all applicable FMVSS, they cannot be categorized as “substantially similar” to the 2006 Mercedes Benz Type 463 SWB Gelaendewagen MPV for the purpose of establishing import eligibility under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A). In addition, while there are some similarities between the SWB and LWB versions, NHTSA has decided that the 2002 through 2004 LWB versions of the vehicle that Mercedes Benz has manufactured for importation into and sale in the United States cannot be categorized as substantially similar to the SWB versions for the purpose of establishing import eligibility under section 30141(a)(1)(A). Therefore, J.K.'s petition is being processed pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(B) alone. J.K. submitted information with its petition intended to demonstrate that 2006 Mercedes Benz Type 463 SWB Gelaendewagen MPVs manufactured before September 1, 2006, as originally manufactured, comply with many applicable FMVSS and are capable of being modified to comply with all other applicable standards to which they were not originally manufactured to conform. Specifically, the petitioner claims that 2006 Mercedes Benz Type 463 SWB Gelaendewagen MPVs manufactured before September 1, 2006 have safety features that comply with Standard Nos. 102 *Transmission Shift Lever Sequence, Starter Interlock, and Transmission Braking Effect* , 103 *Windshield Defrosting and Defogging Systems* , 104 *Windshield Wiping and Washing Systems* , 106 *Brake Hoses* , 113 *Hood Latch System* , 116 *Motor Vehicle Brake Fluid* , 119 *New Pneumatic Tires for Vehicles Other than Passenger Cars* , 124 *Accelerator Control Systems* , 135 *Passenger Car Brake Systems* , 201 *Occupant Protection in Interior Impact* , 202 *Head Restraints* , 204 *Steering Control Rearward Displacement* , 205 *Glazing Materials* , 206 *Door Locks and Door Retention Components* , 207 *Seating Systems* , 209 *Seat Belt Assemblies* , 210 *Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages* , 212 *Windshield Mounting* , 214 *Side Impact Protection* , 216 *Roof Crush Resistance* , 219 * Windshield Zone Intrusion * , and 302 *Flammability of Interior Materials* . The petitioner also contends that the vehicles are capable of being altered to comply with the following standards, in the manner indicated: Standard No. 101 *Controls and Displays:*

(a)Substitution of a lens marked “Brake” for a lens with a noncomplying symbol on the brake failure indicator lamp;

(b)replacement of the speedometer to read in miles per hour;

(c)replacement of the instrument cluster with a U.S.-model component; and

(d)reprogramming and initialization of the vehicle control system to integrate the new instrument cluster and activate required warning systems. Standard No. 108 *Lamps, Reflective Devices and Associated Equipment:*

(a)Installation of U.S.-model taillamp assemblies;

(b)installation of U.S.-model headlamps; and

(c)installation of front and rear U.S.-model sidemarker lamps. Standard No. 110 *Tire selection and Rims for Motor Vehicles With a GVWR of 4,536 Kilograms (10,000 pounds) or Less:* installation of a tire information placard and tire inflation pressure labeling. Standard No. 111 *Rearview Mirrors:* replacement of the passenger side rearview mirror with a U.S.-model component or inscription of the required warning statement on the mirror's surface. Standard No. 114 *Theft Protection:* reprogramming of the vehicle control systems to comply with the standard. Standard No. 118 *Power-Operated Window, Partition, and Roof Panel Systems:* reprogramming of the vehicle control systems to comply with the standard. Standard No. 208 *Occupant Crash Protection:* programming of the vehicle control systems to activate the required seat belt warning system. The petitioner states that the vehicles are equipped with driver's and passenger's air bags and knee bolsters, and with combination lap and shoulder belts that are self-tensioning and that release by means of a single red push button at the front and rear outboard seating positions. Standard No. 225 *Child Restraint Anchorage Systems:* installation of U.S.-model child seat anchorage components. Standard No. 301 *Fuel System Integrity:* The petitioner states that the vehicle's fuel system must be modified with U.S.-model parts to meet U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

(EPA)requirements. The petitioner also states that a vehicle identification plate must be affixed to the vehicle near the left windshield post and a reference and certification label must be affixed in the area of the left front door post to meet the requirements of 49 CFR Part 565. Interested persons are invited to submit comments on the petitions described above. Comments should refer to the docket number and be submitted to: Docket Management, Room PL-401, 400 Seventh St., SW., Washington, DC 20590. [Docket hours are from 9 am to 5 pm]. It is requested but not required that 10 copies be submitted. All comments received before the close of business on the closing date indicated above will be considered, and will be available for examination in the docket at the above address both before and after that date. To the extent possible, comments filed after the closing date will also be considered. Notice of final action on the petition will be published in the **Federal Register** pursuant to the authority indicated below. Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A) and (b)(1); 49 CFR 593.8; delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8. Claude H. Harris, Director Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance. [FR Doc. E6-9399 Filed 6-15-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-59-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration [Docket: PHMSA-99-6355] Request for Public Comments and Office of Management and Budget

(OMB)Approval of an Existing Information Collection (2137-0604) AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), DOT. SUMMARY: This notice requests public participation in the OMB approval process regarding the renewal of an existing PHMSA collection of information. This renewal of information complies with the integrity management rule for hazardous liquid pipelines for operators with more than 500 miles of pipeline. PHMSA is requesting OMB approval for renewal of this information collection under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. With this notice, PHMSA invites the public to submit comments over the next 60 days on ways to minimize the burden associated with the collection of information related to an operator's Integrity Management Program on line segments that could affect High Consequence Areas. DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before August 15, 2006. ADDRESSES: Comments should reference Docket No. PHMSA-99-6355 and may be submitted in the following ways: • DOT Web Site: *http://dms.dot.gov.* To submit comments on the DOT electronic docket site, click “Comment/Submissions,” click “Continue,” fill in the requested information, click “Continue,” enter your comment, then click “Submit.” • Fax: 1-202-493-2251. • Mail: Docket Management System: U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, Room PL-401, Washington, DC 20590-0001. • Hand Delivery: DOT Docket Management System; Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. • E-Gov Web Site: *http://www.Regulations.gov.* This site allows the public to enter comments on any **Federal Register** notice issued by any agency. *Instructions:* You should identify the docket number, PHMSA-99-6355, at the beginning of your comments. If you submit your comments by mail, you should submit two copies. If you wish to receive confirmation that PHMSA received your comments, you should include a self-addressed stamped postcard. Internet users may submit comments at *http://www.regulations.gov,* and may access all comments received by DOT at *http://dms.dot.gov* by performing a simple search for the docket number. Note: All comments will be posted without changes or edits to *http://dms.dot.gov* including any personal information provided. *Privacy Act Statement:* Anyone may search the electronic form of all comments received for any of our dockets. You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the **Federal Register** published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477) or you may visit *http://dms.dot.gov.* FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Fuentevilla at

(202)366-6199, or by e-mail at *William.Fuentevilla@dot.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments are invited on whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Department. These include

(1)whether the information will have practical utility;

(2)the accuracy of the Department's estimate of the burden of the proposed information collections;

(3)ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and

(4)ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Through the Integrity Management Program (49 CFR 195.452), PHMSA requires operators to develop and follow integrity management programs to assess, evaluate, repair, and validate pipeline segments that could impact high consequence areas in the event of leak or failure. The programs must provide for continual assessment of pipeline segments that could affect populated areas, areas unusually sensitive to environmental damage and commercially navigable waterways. Pipeline operators must keep updated written records associated with their programs and have them available for inspection, and submit relevant notices to PHMSA as specified by the regulation. As used in this notice, the term “information collection” includes all work related to preparing and disseminating information related to this recordkeeping requirement including completing paperwork, gathering information, and conducting telephone calls. *Type of Information Collection Request:* Renewal of Existing Collection. *Title of Information Collection:* Pipeline Integrity Management in High Consequence Areas (Operators with more than 500 Miles of Hazardous Liquid Pipelines). *Respondents:* 71 hazardous liquid pipeline operators with more than 500 miles of pipes. *Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents:* 57,510 hours. Issued in Washington, DC on June 9, 2006. Florence L. Hamn, Director of Regulations, Office of Pipeline Safety. [FR Doc. E6-9405 Filed 6-15-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-60-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Office of Hazardous Materials Safety; Notice of Applications for Modification of Special Permit AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, DOT. ACTION: List of applications for modification of special permit. SUMMARY: In accordance with the procedures governing the application for, and the processing of, special permits from the Department of Transportation's Hazardous Material Regulations (49 CFR part 107, subpart B), notice is hereby given that the Office of Hazardous Materials Safety has received the application described herein. This notice is abbreviated to expedite docketing and public notice. Because the sections affected, modes of transportation, and the nature of application have been shown in earlier **Federal Register** publications, they are not repeated here. Request of modifications of special permits ( *e.g.* , to provide for additional hazardous materials, packaging design changes, additional mode of transportation, etc.) are descried in footnotes to the application number. Application numbers with the suffix “M” denote a modification request. These applications have been separated from the new applications for special permits to facilitate processing. DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 3, 2006. *Address Comments to:* Record Center, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC 20590. Comments should refer to the application number and be submitted in triplicate. If confirmation of receipt of comments is desired, include a self-addressed stamped postcard showing the special permit number. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Copies of the application are available for inspection in the Records Center, Nassif Building, 400 7th Street, SW., Washington, DC or at *http://dms.dot.gov* . This notice of receipt of applications for modification of special permits is published in accordance with part 107 of the Federal hazardous materials transportation law (49 U.S.C. 5117(b); 49 CFR 1.53(b)). Issued in Washington, DC, on June 12, 2006. R. Ryan Posten, Chief, Special Permits Program, Office of Hazardous Materials, Special Permits & Approvals. Modification Special Permits Application No. Docket No. Applicant Regulation(s) affected Nature of special permit thereof 3121-M Department of the Army, Ft. Eustis, VA 49 CFR 172.101 (Column 8(c)); 177.841 To modify the special permit to authorize the transportation in commerce of dinitrogen tetroxide without an updated emergency response plan. 7887-M Estes-Cox Corporation, Penrose, CO 49 CFR 172.101; 175.3 To modify the special permit to allow igniters, Division 1.4S, to be shipped in the same inner and outer packaging as model rocket motors and with non-hazardous materials needed to construct model rockets. 10646-M Schlumberger, Sugar Land, TX 49 CFR 173.302 To modify the special permit to authorize design improvements to the bleed valve and construction materials. 11536-M Boeing, Los Angeles, CA 49 CFR 173.102 Spec. Prov. 101; 173.24(g); 173.62; 173.202; 173.304; 175.3 To modify the special permit to authorize an additional spacecraft shipping package containing Class 3 and 8, and Division 2.2 materials. 12068-M 3850 Sea Launch, Long Beach, CA 49 CFR Part 172, Subparts C, D, E and F; 173.62; Part 173, Subparts E, F and G To modify the special permit to authorize the transportation in commerce of a launch vehicle containing Division 1.4 and Class 3 hazardous materials, in non-DOT specification packaging. 13027-M 12451 Hernco Fabrication & Services, Midland, TX 49 CFR 173.241; 173.242 To modify the special permit to authorize the transportation in commerce of additional Division 3 and 8 hazardous materials in non-DOT specification portable tanks. 13207-M 15068 BEI, Honolulu, HI 49 CFR 173.32(f)(5) To modify the exemption to authorize the use of additional DOT Specification IM 101 steel portable tanks that do not conform to the filling density requirements for the transportation of a Class 8 material. 13235-M 15238 Airgas-SAFECOR, Cheyenne, WY 49 CFR 172.203(a); 177.834(h) To modify the special permit to authorize filling and discharging of a horizontally mounted DOT specification 4L cylinder with liquid oxygen, refrigerated liquid without removal from the vehicle. 14205-M 21733 The Clorox Company, Pleasanton, CA 49 CFR 173.306(a)(1) and 173.306(a)(3)(v) To modify the special permit to authorize the transportation in commerce of aerosol products containing Division 2.1 gases. 14282-M R&R Trucking, Incorporated, Galt, MO 49 CFR 173.835(g) To modify the special permit to remove the marking requirements of § 172.203(c). 14327-M 24248 The Colibri Group, Inc., Providence, RI 49 CFR 173.21, 173.308, 175.33 To modify the special permit to authorize the transportation in commerce of any approved lighter when packaged in special travel containers and transported in checked luggage by passenger aircraft. [FR Doc. 06-5464 Filed 6-15-06; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 11

Traces to 11 documents

U.S. Code