Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2006-04-27 · Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Department of Education · Notices

Notices. Notice of intent to fund down the grant slate for the Assistive Technology Act of 1998, as Amended (AT Act)—Assistive Technology Alternative Financing Program (AFP)

991 words·~5 min read·/register/2006/04/27/06-3164

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION [CFDA No.: 84.224C] Assistive Technology Act of 1998, as Amended—Assistive Technology Alternative Financing Program AGENCY: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Department of Education. ACTION: Notice of intent to fund down the grant slate for the Assistive Technology Act of 1998, as Amended (AT Act)—Assistive Technology Alternative Financing Program (AFP). SUMMARY: The Secretary intends to use the grant slate developed for the AT Act AFP in Fiscal Year
(FY)2005 to make new grant awards in FY 2006. The Secretary takes this action because a significant number of high-quality applications remain on the last year's grant slate and limited funding is available for new grant awards in FY 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeremy Buzzell, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room 5025, Potomac Center Plaza, Washington, DC 20202-2800. Telephone:
(202)245-7319. If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may call the Federal Relay Service
(FRS)at 1-800-877-8339. Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an alternative format ( *e.g.* , Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer diskette) on request to the program contact person listed in this section. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On June 30, 2005, we published a notice in the **Federal Register** (70 FR 37794) inviting applications for new awards under the AT Act AFP. This notice indicated that the selection criteria, absolute priority, competitive preference priorities, and application requirements contained in the notice would apply to the FY 2005 grant competition only. We received a significant number of applications for AFP grants in FY 2005 and made eight new grant awards. Because some applications that met the same standard as those that received funding did not receive funding last year and limited funding is available for new awards under this program in FY 2006, we intend to select grantees in FY 2006 from the existing slate of applicants. This slate was developed during the FY 2005 competition using the selection criteria, absolute priority, competitive preference priorities, and application requirements included in the June 30, 2005, notice. No changes to the selection criteria, absolute priority, competitive preference priorities, or application requirements will be required by this action. Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 3001 *et seq.* *Electronic Access to This Document:* You may view this document, as well as all other documents of this Department published in the **Federal Register** , in text or Adobe Portable Document Format
(PDF)on the Internet at the following site: *http://www.ed.gov/news/fedregister.* To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at this site. If you have questions about using PDF, call the U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1-888-293-6498; or in the Washington, DC, area at
(202)512-1530. Note: The official version of this document is the document published in the **Federal Register** . Free Internet access to the official edition of the **Federal Register** and the Code of Federal Regulations is available on GPO Access at: *http://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/index.html.* Dated: April 21, 2006. John H. Hager, Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. [FR Doc. E6-6340 Filed 4-26-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000-01-P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Energy Conservation Program: Proposed Information Collection AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice and request for comments. SUMMARY: The Department of Energy
(DOE)invites public comment on a proposed collection of information that DOE is developing for submission to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB)pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed collection of information is in a final rule pertaining to test procedures for distribution transformers that DOE is publishing in the “Rules” section of today's **Federal Register** . DATES: Consideration will be given to comments submitted by June 26, 2006. ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted to: Department of Energy, Attn: Cyrus Nasseri, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EE-2J), Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20585.
(202)586-9138, E-mail: *cyrus.nasseri@ee.doe.gov* . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: *Collection title:* Test Procedures for Distribution Transformers. *Type of review:* New collection. *OMB number:* None. *Type of respondents:* Manufacturers of low-voltage dry-type distribution transformers. *Estimated number of respondents:* 57 companies. *Estimated total burden hours:* 96 hours total per company per year; based on 56 hours of technician/technical work and 40 hours clerical work. *Frequency of recordkeeping or reporting:* Recordkeeping: maintenance of
(1)data and
(2)calibration procedures and actions. *Abstract:* DOE today is publishing a final rule that establishes test procedures for measuring the energy efficiency of distribution transformers, pursuant to sections 323(b)(10) and 346(a)(1) of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act. (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(10) and 6317(a)(1)) (See “Rules” section of this issue of the **Federal Register** .) That rule contains the following recordkeeping requirements that must be approved by OMB pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et. seq* .) before manufacturers can be required to comply with them:
(1)Section 431.197(a)(4)(i) would require manufacturers of distribution transformers to have records as to alternative efficiency determination methods available for DOE inspection;
(2)section 6.2(f) of Appendix A to subpart K of Part 431 would require maintenance of calibration records; and
(3)section 6.2(b) and
(c)of Appendix A would require documentation of calibration procedures. *Request for Comments:* Pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A), DOE invites comment on:
(1)Whether the recordkeeping requirements in DOE's final rule are necessary;
(2)the accuracy of DOE's estimate of the burden of the proposed information collection;
(3)ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(4)ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who choose to respond. Additional information about DOE's proposed information collection may be obtained from the contact person named in this notice. Issued in Washington, DC, on March 28, 2006. Douglas L. Faulkner, Acting Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. [FR Doc. 06-3164 Filed 4-26-06; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 4
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice of intent to fund down the grant slate for the Assistive Technology Act of 1998, as Amended (AT Act)—Assistive Technology Alternative Financing Program (AFP)
Cites 4Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.