Notices. Amendment to Consolidated Delegation of Authority for the Office of Community Planning and Development
23,309 words·~106 min read·
/register/2006/04/26/06-3938A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT [Docket No. FR-4837-D-59] Amendment, Consolidated Delegation of Authority for the Office of Community Planning and Development AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HUD. ACTION: Amendment to Consolidated Delegation of Authority for the Office of Community Planning and Development. SUMMARY: This notice amends the existing Consolidated Delegation of Authority for Community Planning and Development to add the Renewal Communities, urban Empowerment Zones, and urban Enterprise Communities (RC/EZ/EC) Initiative and Technical Assistance Awards to the list of programs delegated to the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development and the General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development.
This amendment also authorizes the General Deputy Assistant Secretary to further redelegate any of the authority delegated under the Consolidated Delegation of Authority, as amended. DATES: *Effective Date:* March 27, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Daly, Director of Policy Development and Coordination, Office of Community Planning and Development, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 7240, Washington, DC 20410-7000,
(202)708-1817. This is not a toll-free number. For those needing assistance, this number may be accessed via TTY by calling the Federal Information Relay Service at
(800)877-8339. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 16, 2003 (68 FR 54238), the Department published a Consolidated Delegation of Authority for Community Planning and Development programs. This notice amends the existing Consolidated Delegation of Authority for Community Planning and Development by adding the Renewal Communities, urban Empowerment Zones, and urban Enterprise Communities (RC/EZ/EC) Initiative and Technical Assistance Awards to the list of programs delegated to the Assistant Secretary and the General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development. The Consolidated Delegation authorized the Assistant Secretary to further redelegate any authority included therein, excluding those authorities expressly excepted. This amendment similarly authorizes the General Deputy Assistant Secretary to further redelegate any delegated authority, excluding those expressly excepted. This notice also clarifies the authority excepted from the Consolidated Delegation and updates the list of prior delegations of authority superseded by the Consolidated Delegation. Accordingly, the Secretary amends the Consolidated Delegation of Authority for CPD programs at 68 FR 54238 (September 16, 2003), as follows: Section A. Amendment to Consolidated Delegation of Authority At Section A of 68 FR 54238-9 (September 16, 2003), under the heading entitled “Authority”: 1. Paragraph 6 is amended to read as follows: 6. The Renewal Communities, urban Empowerment Zones, and urban Enterprise Communities (RC/EZ/EC) Initiative as authorized under title 26, subtitle A, chapter 1, subchapter U of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, 26 U.S.C. 1391 *et seq.* with respect to urban Empowerment Zones and urban Enterprise Communities and title 26, subtitle A, chapter 1, subchapter X of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, 26 U.S.C. 1400E *et seq.* with respect to Renewal Communities; and grants for urban Empowerment Zones as provided for in annual HUD appropriations acts ( *e.g.* , Consolidated Appropriations Resolution, Fiscal Year 2003, Pub. L. 108-7, 117 Stat. 11, approved February 20, 2003). 2. After paragraph 19(f), a new paragraph is added to the list of programs under which authority is delegated as follows: 20. Technical Assistance Awards as authorized under Section 107(b)(4) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, 42 U.S.C. 5307; Sections 233 and 242 of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 12773 and 12781-83; Section 423 of the Stuart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 11383 *et seq.* ; Title IV of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act, as amended by the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992, 42 U.S.C. 12899 *et seq.* ; and as provided for in annual HUD appropriations acts ( *e.g.* , Consolidated Appropriations Resolution, Fiscal Year 2003, Pub. L. 108-7, 117 Stat. 11, approved February 20, 2003). Section B. Amendment to Authority Excepted At Section B of 68 FR 54238 (September 16, 2003), under the heading entitled “Authority Excepted,” paragraph 2.b. is amended as follows: b. The power to administer the section 107 programs listed in the Delegation of Authority to the Assistant Secretary for Policy Development and Research at 68 FR 42749 (July 18, 2003); Section C. Amendment to Authority to Redelegate At Section C of 68 FR 54238 (September 16, 2003), under the heading entitled “Authority to Redelegate,” is amended to read as follows: The Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development and the General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development are authorized to redelegate to employees of the Department any of the authority delegated under Section A, excluding the authority excepted under Section B, the authority to issue or waive rules and regulations. Section D. Amendment to Delegations Superseded At Section D of 68 FR 54238 (September 16, 2003), under the heading entitled “Delegations Superseded,” after paragraph 19, two new paragraphs are added to the list of delegations superseded as follows: 20. Delegation of Authority from the Secretary to the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, published on January 26, 1998 (63 FR 3761); 21. Delegation of Authority from the Secretary to the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, published on January 11, 1999 (64 FR 1637). Section E. Actions Ratified The Secretary hereby ratifies all actions previously taken by the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development and the General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, with respect to the programs and matters listed in Section A. Authority: Section 7(d), Department of Housing and Urban Development Act, 42 U.S.C. 3535(d). Dated: March 27, 2006. Alphonso Jackson, Secretary. [FR Doc. E6-6246 Filed 4-25-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4210-67-P DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT [Docket No. FR-4837-D-60] Redelegations of Authority to Directors and Deputy Directors of Community Planning and Development in Field Offices AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD. ACTION: Notice of redelegation of authority to field offices. SUMMARY: In this notice, the Assistant Secretary of Community Planning and Development redelegates to the Directors and Deputy Directors of Community Planning and Development in HUD Field Offices all powers and authorities necessary to carry out Office of Community Planning and Development programs, except those powers and authorities specifically excluded. EFFECTIVE DATES: March 27, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Daly, Director of Policy Development and Coordination, Office of Community Planning and Development, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 7240, Washington, DC 20410-7000;
(202)708-1817. This is not a toll-free number. For those needing assistance, this number may be accessed via TTY by Calling the Federal Information Relay Service at 800 877-8339. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 15, 1994 (59 FR 18280), the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development
(CPD)previously redelegated to Directors and Deputy Directors of CPD in HUD Field Offices all powers and authorities necessary to carry out CPD programs, except those powers specifically excluded. A notice published on May 11, 1994 (59 FR 24451), corrected the effective date of the 1994 redelegations. A notice on published June 8, 1995 (60 FR 30312), further amended the 1994 redelegations. On September 16, 2003 (68 FR 54238), the Secretary issued a Consolidated Delegation of Authority for CPD programs to the Assistant Secretary and the General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development. This notice updates and revises redelegations of authority to Directors and Deputy Directors of CPD in HUD Field Offices. Accordingly, the Assistant Secretary redelegates as follows: Section A. General Redelegation of Authority 1. Except as provided in Section C, the Assistant Secretary redelegates to the Directors and Deputy Directors of Community Planning and Development in HUD Field Offices all powers and authorities of the Assistant Secretary necessary to carry out the following Community Planning and Development programs and matters, except those authorities specifically excluded: 1. Community Development Block Grants, Loan Guarantees and other programs covered by Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 5301 *et seq.* *Authority not redelegated:* • Terminate, reduce or limit the availability of grant payments pursuant to section 111(a), 42 U.S.C. 5311. • Adjust entitlement and state grants pursuant to section 104(e), 42 U.S.C. 5304. • Determine basic grant amounts for metropolitan cities, urban counties, and States pursuant to section 106, 42 U.S.C. 5306. • Reallocate funds pursuant to section 106(c) or (d), 42 U.S.C. 5306. • Determine the qualifications of localities for special consideration. This includes, but is not limited to, the determination of qualifications of counties as urban counties pursuant to section 102(a)(6), 42 U.S.C. 5302, the determination of what constitutes a city pursuant to section 102(a)(5), 42 U.S.C. 5302, and the determination of levels of physical and economic distress of cities and urban counties for eligibility for urban development action grants pursuant to section 119(b), 42 U.S.C. 5318. Approve and disapprove applications, or amendments to applications, filed for loan guarantee or grant assistance, issue commitments or grant awards, execute grant agreements, or issue guarantees pursuant to section 108, 42 U.S.C. 5308. 2. Consolidated plans, 24 CFR part 91 (including Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategies based on title I of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 12701 *et seq.* ) and submission and reporting requirements for the programs listed in paragraphs 1, 3, 4, and 6. *Authority not redelegated:* Effect remedies for noncompliance pursuant to section 108 of NAHA 3. Emergency Shelter Grants Program, title IV, subtitle B of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 11371 *et seq.* *Authority not redelegated:* • Determine allocation amounts. 4. HOME Investment Partnerships, title II of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (NAHA), as amended, 42 U.S.C. 12721 *et seq.* *Authority not redelegated:* • Determine allocation and reallocation amounts pursuant to section 217 of NAHA. • Revoke a jurisdiction's designation as a participating jurisdiction pursuant to section 216 of NAHA. • Effect remedies for noncompliance pursuant to section 223 of NAHA. 5. HOPE for Homeownership of Single Family Homes (HOPE 3), title IV, subtitle C of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 12891. 6. Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS, the AIDS Housing Opportunity Act, title VII, subtitle D of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 12901 *et seq.* *Authority not redelegated:* • Determine allocations, adjustments and reallocation amounts. • Revoke a jurisdiction's designation as an eligible state or eligible metropolitan statistical area for a formula allocation or as an eligible applicant for a nonformula allocation. • Effect remedies for noncompliance, such as termination, reduction or limitations on availability of grant payments, under 24 CFR 574.500(c). 7. Supportive Housing, Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation Single Room Occupancy (SRO), and Shelter Plus Care Programs, title IV, subtitles C, D, E and F of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 11301 *et seq.* *Authority not redelegated:* • Make funding decisions. 8. Economic Development Initiative grants, as specified in annual HUD appropriations acts, *e.g.* , Consolidated Appropriations Resolution, 2003, Pub. L. 108-7, 117 Stat. 11 (Feb. 20, 2003). 9. Neighborhood Initiatives grants, as specified in annual HUD appropriations acts, *e.g.* , Consolidated Appropriations Resolution, 2003, Pub. L. 108-7, 117 Stat. 11 (Feb. 20, 2003). 10. The Rural Housing and Economic Development program, as provided for originally in the Fiscal Year 1998 HUD/VA Appropriations Act, Pub. L. 105-65, 111 Stat. 1344 (Oct. 27, 1997), and subsequent annual HUD appropriations acts. 11. The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions Policies Act of 1970 *et seq.* , as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4601 *et seq.* 12. Youthbuild Program, title IV, subtitle D of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 12899 *et seq.* 13. The Renewal Communities, urban Empowerment Zones and urban Enterprise Communities (RC/EZ/EC) Initiative as authorized under title 26, subtitle A, chapter 1, subchapter U of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, 26 U.S.C. 1391 *et seq.* with respect to urban Empowerment Zones and urban Enterprise Communities and title 26, subtitle A, chapter 1, subchapter X of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, 26 U.S.C. 1400E *et seq.* with respect to Renewal Communities; and grants for urban Empowerment Zones as provided for in annual HUD appropriations acts ( *e.g.* , Consolidated Appropriations Resolution, Fiscal Year 2003, Pub. L. 108-7, 117 Stat. 11, approved February 20, 2003). *Authority not redelegated:* • Approve or amend strategic plans or other state and local commitments, including boundary changes. • Revoke a designation, including issuing a warning letter pursuant to 24 CFR parts 597, 598, and 599. 14. District of Columbia Enterprise Zone, title 26, subtitle A, chapter 1, subchapter W of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. 1400 *et seq.* , as amended. *Authority not redelegated:* • Approve or amend strategic plans or other state and local commitments, including boundary changes. 15. Technical Assistance Awards as authorized under Section 107(b)(4) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, 42 U.S.C. 5307; Sections 233 and 242 of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 12773 and 12781-83; Section 423 of the Stuart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 11383 *et seq.* ; Title IV of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act, as amended by the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992, 42 U.S.C. 12899 *et seq.* ; and as provided for in annual HUD appropriations acts, *e.g.* , Consolidated Appropriations Resolution, Fiscal Year 2003, Pub. L. 108-7, 117 Stat. 11, approved February 20, 2003. Section B. Limited Denial of Participation Subject to the excepted authority in Section C (4), the Assistant Secretary redelegates to Directors and Deputy Directors of CPD in HUD Field Offices the authority to order a limited denial of participation sanction pursuant to HUD regulations at 24 CFR 24, subpart J with respect to the programs and matters listed in Section A; provided that the General Counsel, or such other official as may be designated by the General Counsel, must:
(1)Concur in any proposed sanction under part 24 before it is issued, and
(2)concur in any proposed settlement of a sanction under part 24. Section C. General Authority Excepted The authority redelegated under Section A does not include:
(1)The authority to issue or waive regulations;
(2)The authority to sue and be sued;
(3)The authority to effect remedies for noncompliance requiring notice and an opportunity for an administrative hearing; or
(4)Any authority not delegated to the Assistant Secretary for CPD under the Consolidated Delegation of Authority for Community Planning and Development (September 16, 2003, 68 FR 54238). Section D. Authority to Further Redelegate The authority redelegated in Sections A and B may not be further redelegated. Section E. Redelegations Superseded All previous redelegated authorities to Directors and Deputy Directors of Community Planning and Development in HUD Field Offices that are inconsistent with this Redelegation of Authority are hereby superseded, or superseded in part, including, but not limited to, the following:
(1)Redelegation of Authority from the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development to the Field Offices, 59 FR 18280 (April 15, 1994), as amended by Paragraph 6, Delegation and Redelegation of Authority; Correction, 59 FR 24451 (May 11, 1994).
(2)Amendments to the Redelegation of Authority from the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development to the Field Offices, 60 FR 30312 (June 8, 1995). Section F. Continuation in Effect of Other Redelegations Other redelegations of authority by the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, including his or her predecessors, with respect to any of the programs covered by this Redelegation of Authority which
(1)are in effect as of the effective date of this document and
(2)are consistent with this Redelegation of Authority are continued in effect unless and until expressly modified or revoked by a delegation or redelegation of authority issued hereafter. Section G. Actions Ratified The Assistant Secretary hereby ratifies all actions previously taken by the Directors and Deputy Directors of CPD in HUD Field Offices, from September 9, 2003, through the effective date of this document by the Secretary, with respect to the programs and matters listed in Section A and orders of limited denial of participation issued in accordance with Section B. Authority: Section 7(d), Department of Housing and Urban Development Act, 42 U.S.C. 3535(d). Dated: *March 27, 2006.* Pamela H. Patenaude, Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development. [FR Doc. E6-6247 Filed 4-25-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4210-67-P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Minerals Management Service Agency Information Collection Activities: Submitted for Office of Management and Budget
(OMB)Review; Comment Request AGENCY: Minerals Management Service (MMS), Interior. ACTION: Notice of a revision of a currently approved information collection (OMB Control Number 1010-0103). SUMMARY: To comply with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), we are notifying the public that we have submitted to OMB an information collection request
(ICR)to renew approval of the paperwork requirements in the regulations under 30 CFR part 202—Royalties and part 206—Product Valuation. This notice also provides the public a second opportunity to comment on the paperwork burden of these regulatory requirements. The title of this ICR is “30 CFR part 202—Royalties, subpart C—Federal and Indian Oil, and subpart J—Gas Production From Indian Leases; and part 206—Product Valuation, subpart B—Indian Oil, and subpart E—Indian Gas.” The title reflects the previous consolidation of portions of six ICRs relating to Indian oil and gas leases. The six ICRs were previously titled: • 1010-0061: 30 CFR part 206, subpart B—Indian Oil, § 206.55—Determination of Transportation Allowances (Form MMS-4110, Oil Transportation Allowance Report). • 1010-0075: 30 CFR part 206, subpart E—Indian Gas, § 206.178—How do I determine a transportation allowance? (Form MMS-4295, Gas Transportation Allowance Report), and § 206.180—How do I determine an actual processing allowance? (Form MMS-4109, Gas Processing Allowance Summary Report). • 1010-0095: 30 CFR part 206—Product Valuation, Subpart B—Indian Oil, § 206.54; subpart C—Federal Oil, § 206.109; subpart D—Federal Gas, §§ 206.156 and 206.158; and Subpart E—Indian Gas, § 206.177 (Form MMS-4393, Request to Exceed Regulatory Allowance Limitation). Note: ICR 1010-0095 (discontinued May 25, 2005) referenced both Indian and Federal citations. Indian citations now are referenced in 1010-0103, and Federal citations are referenced in 1010-0136; each ICR uses Form MMS-4393. However, the form resides in ICR 1010-0136 where most of the burden hours are incurred. • 1010-0103: 30 CFR part 206, subpart E—Indian Gas (Form MMS-4411, Safety Net Report). • 1010-0104: 30 CFR part 206, subpart E—Indian Gas, §§ 206.172, 206.173, and 206.176 (Form MMS-4410, Accounting for Comparison [Dual Accounting]). • 1010-0138: 30 CFR part 206, subpart B, Establishing Oil Value on Royalty Due on Indian Leases. DATES: Submit written comments on or before May 26, 2006. ADDRESSES: Submit written comments by either FAX
(202)395-6566 or e-mail ( *OIRA_Docket@omb.eop.gov* ) directly to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attention: Desk Officer for the Department of the Interior (OMB Control Number 1010-0103). Please also send a copy of your comments to MMS via e-mail at *mrm.comments@mms.gov* . Include the title of the information collection and the OMB control number in the “Attention” line of your comment. Also include your name and return address. If you do not receive a confirmation that we have received your e-mail, contact Ms. Gebhardt at
(303)231-3211. You may also mail a copy of your comments to Sharron L. Gebhardt, Lead Regulatory Specialist, Minerals Management Service, Minerals Revenue Management, P.O. Box 25165, MS 302B2, Denver, Colorado 80225. If you use an overnight courier service or wish to hand-deliver your comments, our courier address is Building 85, Room A-614, Denver Federal Center, West 6th Ave. and Kipling Blvd., Denver, Colorado 80225. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharron L. Gebhardt, telephone
(303)231-3211, FAX
(303)231-3781, e-mail *Sharron.Gebhardt@mms.gov* . You may also contact Sharron Gebhardt to obtain, at no cost, copies of
(1)the ICR,
(2)any associated forms, and
(3)regulations that require the subject collection of information sent to OMB. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: *Title:* 30 CFR part 202—Royalties, subpart C—Federal and Indian Oil, and subpart J—Gas Production From Indian Leases; and part 206—Product Valuation, subpart B—Indian Oil, and subpart E—Indian Gas. *OMB Control Number:* 1010-0103. *Bureau Form Number:* Forms MMS-4109, MMS-4110, MMS-4295, MMS-4410, and MMS-4411. Form MMS-4393 is used with this ICR (Indian oil and gas) and also with ICR 1010-0136 (Federal oil and gas) where the form resides. *Abstract:* The Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior under the Mineral Leasing Act (30 U.S.C. 1923) and the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1353) is responsible for matters relevant to mineral resource development on Federal and Indian lands and the Outer Continental Shelf
(OCS)including managing the production of minerals from Federal and Indian lands and the OCS, collecting royalties from lessees who produce minerals, and distributing the funds collected in accordance with applicable laws. The Secretary has a trust responsibility to manage Indian lands and seek advice and information from Indian beneficiaries. The MMS performs the royalty management functions and assists the Secretary in carrying out the Department's trust responsibility for Indian lands. Applicable Citations Applicable citations of the laws pertaining to mineral leases on Indian lands include 25 U.S.C. 396d (Chapter 12—Lease, Sale or Surrender of Allotted or Unallotted Lands); 25 U.S.C. 2103 (Indian Mineral Development Act of 1982); and Public Law 97-451—Jan. 12, 1983 (Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Management Act of 1982 [FOGRMA]). The CFR citations we are covering in this ICR are 30 CFR part 202, subpart J, and part 206, subparts B and E. Public laws pertaining to mineral royalties are located on our website at *http://www.mrm.mms.gov/Laws_R_D/PublicLawsAMR.htm.* Background When a company or an individual enters into a lease to explore, develop, produce, and dispose of minerals from Federal or Indian lands, that company or individual agrees to pay the lessor a share (royalty) of the value received from production from the leased lands. The lease creates a business relationship between the lessor and the lessee. The lessee is required to report various kinds of information to the lessor relative to the disposition of the leased minerals. Such information is similar to data reported to private and public mineral interest owners and is generally available within the records of the lessee or others involved in developing, transporting, processing, purchasing, or selling of such minerals. The information MMS collects includes data necessary to ensure that royalties are accurately valued and appropriately paid or distributed. Regulations at 30 CFR part 202, subparts C and J, and part 206, subparts B and E, govern the valuation of oil and gas produced from leases on Indian lands. Indian tribes and individual Indian mineral owners receive all royalties generated from their lands. Determining product valuation is essential to ensure that Indian tribes and individual Indian mineral owners receive payment on the full value of the minerals removed from their lands. Tribal representatives have expressed their concern that the Secretary continue to fulfill all trust and fiduciary duties and ensure that the correct royalty is received from Indian lands. Failure to collect the data described in this information collection could result in the undervaluation of leased minerals on Indian lands. The data collected and associated forms are necessary to perform the MMS regulatory functions and are discussed in detail below. All data reported is subject to subsequent audit and adjustment. Indian Oil Regulations at 30 CFR part 206, subpart B, which govern the valuation for royalty purposes of oil produced from Indian oil and gas leases (tribal and allotted), must be consistent with mineral leasing laws, other applicable laws, and lease terms. Regulations at § 206.52 explain how lessees must determine the value of oil produced from Indian oil and gas leases. Generally, the regulations provide that lessees determine the value of oil based on:
(1)The gross proceeds under an arm's-length contract,
(2)a series of benchmarks under a non-arm's-length contract, or
(3)major portion analysis. These oil valuation methods are eligible for applicable transportation allowances. Form MMS-4110, Oil Transportation Allowance Report Under certain circumstances, the regulations authorize lessees to deduct from royalty payments the reasonable actual costs of transporting the royalty portion of produced minerals from the lease to a sales point not in the immediate lease area. The regulations establish a limit on transportation allowances for oil at 50 percent of the value of the oil at the point of sale. From information collected on Form MMS-4110:
(1)MMS verifies transportation allowances during the product valuation verification to determine if the lessee reported and paid the proper royalty amount; and
(2)MMS and tribal personnel evaluate whether the transportation allowances reported and claimed by lessees are within regulatory allowance limitations. Form MMS-4110 is used for both arm's-length and non-arm's-length contracts. To receive an oil transportation allowance, lessees must submit Form MMS-4110 before or in the same month that they report the transportation allowance on Form MMS-2014, Report of Sales and Royalty Remittance (OMB Control Number 1010-0140, expiration date October 31, 2006). After the initial reporting period and for succeeding reporting periods, lessees must submit page one of Form MMS-4110 (and Schedule 1) within 3 months after the end of the calendar year, or after the applicable contract or rate terminates or is modified or amended, whichever is earlier, unless MMS approves a longer period. Completed Form MMS-4110 and supporting schedules summarize actual operating, maintenance, and overhead costs, as well as depreciation and undepreciated capital investment costs. Indian Gas Regulations at 30 CFR part 206, subpart E, govern the valuation for royalty purposes of natural gas produced from Indian oil and gas leases. The regulations apply to all gas production from Indian oil and gas leases (tribal and allotted), except leases on the Osage Indian Reservation. Form MMS-4411, Safety Net Report The safety net calculation establishes the minimum value, for royalty purposes, of natural gas production from Indian oil and gas leases. This reporting requirement ensures that Indian lessors receive all royalties due and aids MMS compliance efforts. The regulations require lessees to submit Form MMS-4411 when gas production from an Indian oil or gas lease is sold beyond the first index pricing point. The lessee submits safety net prices, for the previous calendar year, to MMS annually (by June 30) using this form. Form MMS-4410, Accounting for Comparison [Dual Accounting] Most Indian leases contain the requirement to perform accounting for comparison (dual accounting) for gas produced from the lease. Lessees must elect to perform actual dual accounting as defined in 30 CFR 206.176 or alternative dual accounting as defined in 30 CFR 206.173. According to 30 CFR 206.176, dual accounting is defined as the greater of the following two values:
(1)The value of gas prior to processing, less any applicable allowances, or
(2)The combined value of residue gas and gas plant products resulting from processing the gas, less any applicable allowances, plus any drip condensate associated with the processed gas recovered downstream of the point of royalty settlement, without resorting to processing, less applicable allowances. Lessees use Form MMS-4410 to certify that dual accounting is not required on an Indian lease or to make an election for actual or alternative dual accounting for Indian leases. Form MMS-4410 (Part A), Certification for Not Performing Dual Accounting, requires lessees to identify the MMS-designated areas where the leases are located and provide specific justification for not performing dual accounting. Part A is a one-time notification, until any changes occur in gas disposition. Part A lists the following acceptable reasons for not performing dual accounting:
(1)The lease terms do not require dual accounting;
(2)none of the gas from the lease is ever processed;
(3)gas has a Btu content of 1,000 Btu's per cubic foot or less at the lease's facility measurement point(s);
(4)none of the gas from the lease is processed until after gas flows into a pipeline with an index located in an index zone; and
(5)none of the gas from the lease is processed until after gas flows into a mainline pipeline not located in an index zone. Form MMS-4410 (Part B), Election to Perform Actual Dual Accounting or Alternative Dual Accounting, allows MMS to collect the lessee's elections to perform actual dual accounting or alternative dual accounting. A lessee makes an election by checking either the actual or alternative dual accounting box for each MMS-designated area where its leases are located. Part B also includes the lessee's lease prefixes within each MMS-designated area to assist lessees in making the appropriate election. The election to perform actual or alternative dual accounting applies to all of a lessee's Indian leases in each MMS-designated area. The first election to use the alternative dual accounting is effective from the time of election through the end of the following calendar year. Thereafter, each election to use the alternative dual accounting methodology must remain in effect for 2 calendar years. However, lessees may return to the actual dual accounting methodology only at the beginning of the next election period or with written approval from MMS and the tribal lessors for tribal leases, and from MMS for Indian allotted leases in the MMS-designated area (30 CFR 206.173(a)). Form MMS-4295, Gas Transportation Allowance Report Under certain circumstances, the regulations authorize lessees to deduct from royalty payments the reasonable actual costs of transporting the royalty portion of produced minerals from the lease to a processing or sales point not in the immediate lease area. The regulations establish a limit on transportation allowance deductions for gas at 50 percent of the value of the gas at the point of sale. The MMS and tribal personnel use the information collected on Form MMS-4295 to evaluate whether the non-arm's-length or no contract transportation allowances reported and claimed by lessees are reasonable, actual costs and are within regulatory allowance limitations. To take a non-arm's-length or no contract transportation deduction, a lessee must submit Form MMS-4295 within 3 months after the end of the 12-month period to which the allowance applies. Form MMS-4109, Gas Processing Allowance Summary Report When gas is processed for the recovery of gas plant products, lessees may claim a processing allowance. The regulations establish a limit of 66 2/3 percent of the value of each gas plant product as an allowable gas processing deduction. The MMS normally accepts the cost as stated in the lessee's arm's-length processing contract as being representative of the cost of the processing allowance. In those instances where gas is being processed through a lessee-owned plant, the lessee must base processing costs on the actual plant operating and maintenance expenses, depreciation, and a reasonable return on investment. The allowance is expressed as a cost per unit of individual gas plant products. Lessees may take processing allowances as a deduction from royalty payments. The MMS and tribal personnel use the information collected on Form MMS-4109 to evaluate whether the non-arm's-length or no contract processing allowances reported and claimed by lessees are reasonable, actual costs and are within regulatory allowance limitations. To take a non-arm's-length or no contract processing deduction, lessees must submit Form MMS-4109 within 3 months after the end of the 12-month period to which the allowance applies. Indian Oil and Gas Form MMS-4393, Request to Exceed Regulatory Allowance Limitation Form MMS-4393 is used for both Federal and Indian leases. Most of the burden hours are incurred on Federal leases; therefore, the form and all the burden hours are approved under ICR 1010-0136. However, we included a discussion of the form in this ICR as well. Upon proper application from the lessee, MMS may approve an oil or gas transportation allowance in excess of 50 percent (Federal or Indian) or a gas processing allowance in excess of 66 2/3 percent (Federal only). To request permission to exceed a regulatory allowance limit, lessees must submit a letter to MMS explaining why a higher allowance limit is necessary and provide supporting documentation, including a completed Form MMS-4393. This form provides MMS with the data necessary to make a decision whether to approve or deny the request and track deductions on royalty reports. Summary The MMS is requesting OMB's approval to continue to collect this information. Not collecting this information would limit the Secretary's ability to discharge his/her duties and may also result in loss of royalty payments to Indian tribes and individual Indian mineral owners. Proprietary information submitted to MMS under this collection is protected, and no items of a sensitive nature are collected. In some cases the requirement to respond is mandatory, such as reporting royalty values or declaring the type of dual accounting election the lessee chooses to perform. In other cases, it is voluntary, such as asking permission to exceed a transportation allowance limit. For example, a lessee can request, but is not required to apply for, a transportation allowance deduction in excess of the regulatory limits. However, if no request is made, the transportation limitation is set by regulation. *Frequency of Response:* Annually and on occasion. *Estimated Number and Description of Respondents:* 123 Indian lessees. *Estimated Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping “Hour” Burden:* 1,276 hours. We have not included in our estimates certain requirements performed in the normal course of business and considered usual and customary. The following chart shows the estimated burden hours by CFR section and paragraph: Respondents' Estimated Annual Burden Hours 30 CFR Reporting and recordkeeping requirement Hour burden Average number of annual responses Annual burden hours 202—ROYALTIES Subpart C—Federal and Indian Oil 202.101 Standards for reporting and paying royalties Oil volumes are to be reported in barrels of clean oil of 42 standard U.S. gallons (231 cubic inches each) at 60 °F * * * Burden covered under OMB Control Number 1010-0140 (expires 10/31/2006). Burden covered under § 210.52. Subpart J—Gas Production From Indian Leases 202.551
(b)How do I determine the volume of production for which I must pay royalty if my lease is not in an approved Federal unit or communitization agreement (AFA)?
(b)You and all other persons paying royalties on the lease must report and pay royalties based on your takes * * * Burden covered under OMB Control Number 1010-0140 (expires 10/31/2006). Burden covered under § 210.52. 202.551
(c)How do I determine the volume of production for which I must pay royalty if my lease is not in an approved Federal unit or communitization agreement (AFA)?
(c)You and all other persons paying royalties on the lease may ask MMS for permission * * * 1 1 1 202.558
(a)and
(b)What standards do I use to report and pay royalties on gas?
(a)You must report gas volumes as follows: * * *
(b)You must report residue gas and gas plant product volumes as follows: * * * Burden covered under OMB Control Number 1010-0140 (expires 10/31/2006). Burden covered under § 210.52. 206—PRODUCT VALUATION Subpart B—Indian Oil 206.52 (b)(1)(i) and (iii), (b)(2), and
(d)Valuation standards (b)(1)(i) * * * The lessee shall have the burden of demonstrating that its contract is arm's-length * * *
(iii)* * * When MMS determines that the value may be unreasonable, MMS will notify the lessee and give the lessee an opportunity to provide written information justifying the lessee's value * * * (b)(2) MMS may require a lessee to certify that its arm's-length contract provisions include all of the consideration to be paid by the buyer, either directly or indirectly, for the oil
(d)Any Indian lessee will make available, upon request to the authorized MMS or Indian representatives, to the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of the Interior, or other persons authorized to receive such information, arm's-length sales and volume data for like-quality production sold, purchased, or otherwise obtained by the lessee from the field or area or from nearby fields or areas PRODUCE RECORDS—The Office of Regulatory Affairs
(ORA)determined that the audit process is not covered by the PRA because MMS staff asks non-standard questions to resolve exceptions. 206.52 (e)(1) Valuation standards (e)(1) Where the value is determined under paragraph
(c)of this section, the lessee shall retain all data relevant to the determination of royalty value * * * Burden covered under OMB Control Number 1010-0140 (expires 10/31/2006). 206.52 (e)(2) Valuation standards (e)(2) A lessee shall notify MMS if it has determined value under paragraph (c)(4) or (c)(5) of this section * * * The letter shall identify the valuation method to be used and contain a brief description of the procedure to be followed * * * 20 1 20 206.52
(g)Valuation standards
(g)The lessee may request a value determination from MMS * * * The lessee shall submit all available data relevant to its proposal * * * 40 1 40 206.54 (b)(2) Transportation allowances—general (b)(2) Upon request of a lessee, MMS may approve a transportation allowance deduction in excess of the limitation prescribed by paragraph (b)(1) of this section * * * An application for exception (using Form MMS-4393, Request to Exceed Regulatory Allowance Limitation) shall contain all relevant and supporting documentation necessary for MMS to make a determination * * * Burden covered under OMB Control Number 1010-0136 (expires 05/31/2006). 206.55 (a)(1)(i) Determination of transportation allowances
(a)Arm's-length transportation contracts. (1)(i) * * * Before any deduction may be taken, the lessee must submit a completed page one of Form MMS-4110 (and Schedule 1), Oil Transportation Allowance Report * * * Burden covered under § 206.55(c)(1)(i) and (iii). 206.55 (a)(2)(i) Determination of transportation allowances
(a)Arm's-length transportation contracts. (2)(i) * * * Except as provided in this paragraph, no allowance may be taken for the costs of transporting lease production which is not royalty-bearing without MMS approval Burden covered under § 206.55(a)(3). 206.55 (a)(2)(ii) Determination of transportation allowances
(a)Arm's-length transportation contracts. (2)(ii) Notwithstanding the requirements of paragraph (i), the lessee may propose to MMS a cost allocation method on the basis of the values of the products transported * * * 20 1 20 206.55 (a)(3) Determination of transportation allowances
(a)Arm's-length transportation contracts.
(3)If an arm's-length transportation contract includes both gaseous and liquid products, and the transportation costs attributable to each product cannot be determined from the contract, the lessee shall propose an allocation procedure to MMS * * * The lessee shall submit all available data to support its proposal * * * 40 1 40 206.55 (b)(1) Determination of transportation allowances
(b)Non-arm's-length or no contract.
(1)* * * A transportation allowance may be claimed retroactively for a period of not more than 3 months prior to the first day of the month that Form MMS-4110 is filed with MMS, unless MMS approves a longer period upon a showing of good cause by the lessee * * * Burden covered under § 206.55(c)(2)(i), and (c)(2)(iii). 206.55 (b)(1) Determination of transportation allowances
(b)Non-arm's-length or no contract.
(1)* * * When necessary or appropriate, MMS may direct a lessee to modify its actual transportation allowance deduction. Burden covered under OMB Control Number 1010-0140 (expires 10/31/2006). Burden covered under § 210.52. 206.55 (b)(2)(iv) Determination of transportation allowances
(b)Non-arm's-length or no contract. (2)(iv) * * * After a lessee has elected to use either method for a transportation system, the lessee may not later elect to change to the other alternative without approval of MMS 20 1 20 206.55 (b)(2)(iv)(A) Determination of transportation allowances
(b)Non-arm's-length or no contract. (2)(iv)(A) * * * After an election is made, the lessee may not change methods without MMS approval * * * 20 1 20 206.55 (b)(3)(i) Determination of transportation allowances
(b)Non-arm's-length or no contract. (3)(i) * * * Except as provided in this paragraph, the lessee may not take an allowance for transporting lease production which is not royalty bearing without MMS approval 40 1 40 206.55 (b)(3)(ii) Determination of transportation allowances
(b)Non-arm's-length or no contract. (3)(ii) Notwithstanding the requirements of paragraph (i), the lessee may propose to MMS a cost allocation method on the basis of the values of the products transported * * * 20 1 20 206.55 (b)(4) Determination of transportation allowances
(b)Non-arm's-length or no contract.
(4)Where both gaseous and liquid products are transported through the same transportation system, the lessee shall propose a cost allocation procedure to MMS * * * The lessee shall submit all available data to support its proposal. * * * 20 1 20 206.55 (b)(5) Determination of transportation allowances
(b)Non-arm's-length or no contract.
(5)A lessee may apply to MMS for an exception from the requirement that it compute actual costs in accordance with paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(4) of this section * * * 20 1 20 206.55 (c)(1)(i) Determination of transportation allowances
(c)Reporting requirements.
(1)Arm's-length contracts.
(i)With the exception of those transportation allowances specified in paragraphs (c)(1)(v) and (c)(1)(vi) of this section, the lessee shall submit page one of the initial Form MMS-4110 (and Schedule 1), Oil Transportation Allowance Report, prior to, or at the same time as, the transportation allowance determined under an arm's-length contract, is reported on Form MMS-2014, Report of Sales and Royalty Remittance * * * 4 3 12 206.55 (c)(1)(iii) Determination of transportation allowances
(c)Reporting requirements.
(1)Arm's-length contracts.
(iii)After the initial reporting period and for succeeding reporting periods, lessees must submit page one of Form MMS-4110 (and Schedule 1) within 3 months after the end of the calendar year, or after the applicable contract or rate terminates or is modified or amended, whichever is earlier, unless MMS approves a longer period (during which period the lessee shall continue to use the allowance from the previous reporting period) 4 3 12 206.55 (c)(1)(iv) Determination of transportation allowances
(c)Reporting requirements.
(1)Arm's-length contracts.
(iv)MMS may require that a lessee submit arm's-length transportation contracts, production agreements, operating agreements, and related documents. Documents shall be submitted within a reasonable time, as determined by MMS PRODUCE RECORDS—The ORA determined that the audit process is not covered by the PRA because MMS staff asks non-standard questions to resolve exceptions. 206.55 (c)(2)(i) Determination of transportation allowances
(c)Reporting requirements.
(2)Non-arm's-length or no contract.
(i)With the exception of those transportation allowances specified in paragraphs (c)(2)(v), (c)(2)(vii) and (c)(2)(viii) of this section, the lessee shall submit an initial Form MMS-4110 prior to, or at the same time as, the transportation allowance determined under a non-arm's-length contract or no-contract situation is reported on Form MMS-2014 * * * The initial report may be based upon estimated costs 6 3 18 206.55 (c)(2)(iii) Determination of transportation allowances
(c)Reporting requirements.
(2)Non-arm's-length or no contract.
(iii)For calendar-year reporting periods succeeding the initial reporting period, the lessee shall submit a completed Form MMS-4110 containing the actual costs for the previous reporting period. If oil transportation is continuing, the lessee shall include on Form MMS-4110 its estimated costs for the next calendar year. * * * MMS must receive the Form MMS-4110 within 3 months after the end of the previous reporting period, unless MMS approves a longer period (during which period the lessee shall continue to use the allowance from the previous reporting period) 6 3 18 206.55 (c)(2)(iv) Determination of transportation allowances
(c)Reporting requirements.
(2)Non-arm's-length or no contract.
(iv)For new transportation facilities or arrangements, the lessee's initial Form MMS-4110 shall include estimates of the allowable oil transportation costs for the applicable period * * * Burden covered under § 206.55(c)(2)(i). 206.55 (c)(2)(v) Determination of transportation allowances
(c)Reporting requirements.
(2)Non-arm's-length or no contract.
(v)* * * only those allowances that have been approved by MMS in writing * * * Burden covered under § 206.55(c)(2)(i). 206.55(c)(2)(vi) Determination of transportation allowances
(c)Reporting requirements.
(2)Non-arm's-length or no contract.
(vi)Upon request by MMS, the lessee shall submit all data used to prepare its Form MMS-4110. The data shall be provided within a reasonable period of time, as determined by MMS PRODUCE RECORDS—The ORA determined that the audit process is not covered by the PRA because MMS staff asks non-standard questions to resolve exceptions. 206.55 (c)(4) and (e)(2) Determination of transportation allowances
(c)Reporting requirements.
(4)Transportation allowances must be reported as a separate line item on Form MMS-2014, * * *.
(e)Adjustments.
(2)For lessees transporting production from Indian leases, the lessee must submit a corrected Form MMS-2014 to reflect actual costs, * * *. Burden covered under OMB Control Number 1010-0140 (expires 10/31/2006). Burden covered under § 210.52. 206—PRODUCT VALUATION Subpart E—Indian Gas 206.172(b)(1)(ii) How do I value gas produced from leases in an index zone?
(b)Valuing residue gas and gas before processing. (1)(ii) Gas production that you certify on Form MMS-4410, * * * is not processed before it flows into a pipeline with an index but which may be processed later * * *. 4 25 100 206.172(e)(6)(i) and
(iii)How do I value gas produced from leases in an index zone?
(e)Determining the minimum value for royalty purposes of gas sold beyond the first index pricing point (6)(i) You must report the safety net price for each index zone to MMS on Form MMS-4411, Safety Net Report, no later than June 30 following each calendar year; * * *
(iii)MMS may order you to amend your safety net price within one year from the date your Form MMS-4411 is due or is filed, whichever is later. * * * 3 20 60 206.172(e)(6)(ii) How do I value gas produced from leases in an index zone?
(e)Determining the minimum value for royalty purposes of gas sold beyond the first index pricing point (6)(ii) You must pay and report on Form MMS-2014 additional royalties due no later than June 30 following each calendar year * * * Burden covered under OMB Control Number 1010-0140 (expires 10/31/2006). Burden covered under § 210.52. 206.172(f)(1)(ii), (f)(2), and (f)(3) How do I value gas produced from leases in an index zone?
(f)Excluding some or all tribal leases from valuation under this section
(1)An Indian tribe may ask MMS to exclude some or all of its leases from valuation under this section * * *
(ii)If an Indian tribe requests exclusion from an index zone for less than all of its leases, MMS will approve the request only if the excluded leases may be segregated into one or more groups based on separate fields within the reservation
(2)An Indian tribe may ask MMS to terminate exclusion of its leases from valuation under this section * * *
(3)The Indian tribe's request to MMS under either paragraph (f)(1) or
(2)of this section must be in the form of a tribal resolution * * * 40 1 40 206.173(a)(1) How do I calculate the alternative methodology for dual accounting?
(a)Electing a dual accounting method.
(1)* * * You may elect to perform the dual accounting calculation according to either § 206.176(a) (called actual dual accounting), or paragraph
(b)of this section (called the alternative methodology for dual accounting) 2 35 70 206.173(a)(2) How do I calculate the alternative methodology for dual accounting?
(a)Electing a dual accounting method.
(2)You must make a separate election to use the alternative methodology for dual accounting for your Indian leases in each MMS-designated area. * * * Burden covered under § 206.173(a)(1). 206.174(a)(4)(ii) How do I value gas production when an index-based method cannot be used?
(a)Situations in which an index-based method cannot be used. (4)(ii) If the major portion value is higher, you must submit an amended Form MMS-2014 to MMS by the due date specified in the written notice from MMS of the major portion value * * * Burden covered under OMB Control Number 1010-0140 (expires 10/31/2006). Burden covered under § 210.52. 206.174 (b)(1)(i) and (iii); (b)(2); (d)(2) How do I value gas production when an index-based method cannot be used?
(b)Arm's-length contracts. (1)(i) You have the burden of demonstrating that your contract is arm's-length.* * *
(iii)* * * In these circumstances, MMS will notify you and give you an opportunity to provide written information justifying your value. * * *. (b)(2) MMS may require you to certify that your arm's-length contract provisions include all of the consideration the buyer pays, either directly or indirectly, for the gas, residue gas, or gas plant product.
(d)Supporting data.
(2)You must make all such data available upon request to the authorized MMS or Indian representatives, to the Office of the Inspector General of the Department, or other authorized persons.* * *. PRODUCE RECORDS—The ORA determined that the audit process is not covered by the PRA because MMS staff asks non-standard questions to resolve exceptions. 206.174
(d)How do I value gas production when an index-based method cannot be used?
(d)Supporting data. If you determine the value of production under paragraph
(c)of this section, you must retain all data relevant to determination of royalty value. Burden covered under OMB Control Number 1010-0140 (expires 10/31/2006). 206.174
(f)How do I value gas production when an index-based method cannot be used?
(f)Value guidance. You may ask MMS for guidance in determining value. You may propose a valuation method to MMS. Submit all available data related to your proposal and any additional information MMS deems necessary. * * *. 40 1 40 206.175(d)(4) How do I determine quantities and qualities of production for computing royalties? (d)(4) You may request MMS approval of other methods for determining the quantity of residue gas and gas plant products allocable to each lease. * * * 20 1 20 206.176(b) How do I perform accounting for comparison?
(b)If you are required to account for comparison, you may elect to use the alternative dual accounting methodology provided for in § 206.173 instead of the provisions in paragraph
(a)of this section Burden covered under § 206.173(a)(1). 206.176(c) How do I perform accounting for comparison?
(c)* * * If you do not perform dual accounting, you must certify to MMS that gas flows into such a pipeline before it is processed Burden covered under § 206.172(b)(1)(ii). TRANSPORTATION ALLOWANCES 206.177(c)(2) and (c)(3) What general requirements regarding transportation allowances apply to me? (c)(2) If you ask MMS, MMS may approve a transportation allowance deduction in excess of the limitation in paragraph (c)(1) of this section. * * *.
(3)Your application for exception (using Form MMS-4393, Request to Exceed Regulatory Allowance Limitation) must contain all relevant and supporting documentation necessary for MMS to make a determination. Burden covered under OMB Control Number 1010-0136 (expires 05/31/2006) 206.178 (a)(1)(i) How do I determine a transportation allowance?
(a)Determining a transportation allowance under an arm's-length contract. (1)(i) * * * You are required to submit to MMS a copy of your arm's-length transportation contract(s) and all subsequent amendments to the contract(s) within 2 months of the date MMS receives your report which claims the allowance on Form MMS-2014. 1 50 50 206.178(a)(1)(iii) How do I determine a transportation allowance?
(a)Determining a transportation allowance under an arm's-length contract. (1)(iii) If MMS determines that the consideration paid under an arm's-length transportation contract does not reflect the value of the transportation because of misconduct by or between the contracting parties * * * In these circumstances, MMS will notify you and give you an opportunity to provide written information justifying your transportation costs. PRODUCE RECORDS—The ORA determined that the audit process is not covered by the PRA because MMS staff asks non-standard questions to resolve exceptions. 206.178(a)(2)(i) and
(ii)How do I determine a transportation allowance?
(a)Determining a transportation allowance under an arm's-length contract. (2)(i) of this section * * * you cannot take an allowance for the costs of transporting lease production that is not royalty bearing without MMS approval, or without lessor approval on tribal leases.
(ii)As an alternative to paragraph (a)(2)(i), you may propose to MMS a cost allocation method based on the values of the products transported. * * *. 20 1 20 206.178(a)(3)(i) and
(ii)How do I determine a transportation allowance?
(a)Determining a transportation allowance under an arm's-length contract. (3)(i) If your arm's-length transportation contract includes both gaseous and liquid products and the transportation costs attributable to each cannot be determined from the contract, you must propose an allocation procedure to MMS. * * *.
(ii)You are required to submit all relevant data to support your allocation proposal. * * *. 40 1 40 206.178(b)(1)(ii) How do I determine a transportation allowance?
(b)Determining a transportation allowance under a non-arm's-length contract or no contract (1)(ii) * * * You must submit the actual cost information to support the allowance to MMS on Form MMS-4295, Gas Transportation Allowance Report, within 3 months after the end of the 12-month period to which the allowance applies. * * * 15 7 105 206.178(b)(2)(iv) How do I determine a transportation allowance?
(b)Determining a transportation allowance under a non-arm's-length contract or no contract (2)(iv) You may use either depreciation with a return on undepreciated capital investment or a return on depreciable capital investment. * * * you may not later elect to change to the other alternative without MMS approval 20 1 20 206.178(b)(2)(iv)(A) How do I determine a transportation allowance?
(b)Determining a transportation allowance under a non-arm's-length contract or no contract (2)(iv)(A) * * * Once you make an election, you may not change methods without MMS approval * * * 20 1 20 206.178(b)(3)(i) How do I determine a transportation allowance?
(b)Determining a transportation allowance under a non-arm's-length contract or no contract (3)(i) * * *. Except as provided in this paragraph, you may not take an allowance for transporting a product that is not royalty bearing without MMS approval 40 1 40 206.178(b)(3)(ii) How do I determine a transportation allowance?
(b)Determining a transportation allowance under a non-arm's-length contract or no contract (3)(ii) As an alternative to the requirements of paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section, you may propose to MMS a cost allocation method based on the values of the products transported * * * 20 1 20 206.178(b)(5) How do I determine a transportation allowance?
(b)Determining a transportation allowance under a non-arm's-length contract or no contract
(5)If you transport both gaseous and liquid products through the same transportation system, you must propose a cost allocation procedure to MMS * * *. You are required to submit all relevant data to support your proposal * * * 40 1 40 206.178(d)(1) How do I determine a transportation allowance?
(d)Reporting your transportation allowance.
(1)If MMS requests, you must submit all data used to determine your transportation allowance * * * PRODUCE RECORDS—The ORA determined that the audit process is not covered by the PRA because MMS staff asks non-standard questions to resolve exceptions. 206.178 (d)(2), (e), and (f)(1) How do I determine a transportation allowance?
(d)Reporting your transportation allowance.
(2)You must report transportation allowances as a separate line item on Form MMS-2014 * * *.
(e)Adjusting incorrect allowances. If for any month the transportation allowance you are entitled to is less than the amount you took on Form MMS-2014, you are required to report and pay additional royalties due, plus interest computed under 30 CFR 218.54 from the first day of the first month you deducted the improper transportation allowance until the date you pay the royalties due * * *.
(f)Determining allowable costs for transportation allowances * * *.
(1)Firm demand charges paid to pipelines * * *. You must modify the Form MMS-2014 by the amount received or credited for the affected reporting period Burden covered under OMB Control Number 1010-0140 (expires 10/31/2006). Burden covered under § 210.52. PROCESSING ALLOWANCES 206.180(a)(1)(i) How do I determine an actual processing allowance?
(a)Determining a processing allowance if you have an arm's-length processing contract (1)(i) * * * You have the burden of demonstrating that your contract is arm's-length. You are required to submit to MMS a copy of your arm's-length contract(s) and all subsequent amendments to the contract(s) within 2 months of the date MMS receives your first report that deducts the allowance on the Form MMS-2014 1 30 30 206.180(a)(1)(iii) How do I determine an actual processing allowance?
(a)Determining a processing allowance if you have an arm's-length processing contract (1)(iii) If MMS determines that the consideration paid under an arm's-length processing contract does not reflect the value of the processing because of misconduct by or between the contracting parties * * *. In these circumstances, MMS will notify you and give you an opportunity to provide written information justifying your processing costs PRODUCE RECORDS— The ORA determined that the audit process is not covered by the PRA because MMS staff asks non-standard questions to resolve exceptions. 206.180(a)(3) How do I determine an actual processing allowance?
(a)Determining a processing allowance if you have an arm's-length processing contract
(3)If your arm's-length processing contract includes more than one gas plant product and the processing costs attributable to each product cannot be determined from the contract, you must propose an allocation procedure to MMS * * *. You are required to submit all relevant data to support your proposal * * * 40 1 40 206.180(b)(1)(ii) How do I determine an actual processing allowance?
(b)Determining a processing allowance if you have a non-arm's-length contract or no contract (1)(ii) * * * You must submit the actual cost information to support the allowance to MMS on Form MMS-4109, Gas Processing Allowance Summary Report, within 3 months after the end of the 12-month period for which the allowance applies * * * 20 5 100 206.180(b)(2)(iv) How do I determine an actual processing allowance?
(b)Determining a processing allowance if you have a non-arm's-length contract or no contract (2)(iv) You may use either depreciation with a return on undepreciable capital investment or a return on depreciable capital investment * * *. you may not later elect to change to the other alternative without MMS approval 20 1 20 206.180(b)(2)(iv)(A) How do I determine an actual processing allowance?
(b)Determining a processing allowance if you have a non-arm's-length contract or no contract (2)(iv)(A) * * * Once you make an election, you may not change methods without MMS approval * * * 20 1 20 206.180(b)(3) How do I determine an actual processing allowance?
(b)Determining a processing allowance if you have a non-arm's-length contract or no contract
(3)Your processing allowance under this paragraph
(b)must be determined based upon a calendar year or other period if you and MMS agree to an alternative 20 1 20 206.180(c)(1) How do I determine an actual processing allowance?
(c)Reporting your processing allowance.
(1)If MMS requests, you must submit all data used to determine your processing allowance * * *. PRODUCE RECORDS—The ORA determined that the audit process is not covered by the PRA because MMS staff asks non-standard questions to resolve exceptions. 206.180(c)(2) and
(d)How do I determine an actual processing allowance?
(c)Reporting your processing allowance
(2)You must report gas processing allowances as a separate line item on the Form MMS-2014. * * *
(d)Adjusting incorrect processing allowances. If for any month the gas processing allowance you are entitled to is less than the amount you took on Form MMS-2014, you are required to pay additional royalties, plus interest computed under 30 CFR 218.54 from the first day of the first month you deducted a processing allowance until the date you pay the royalties due * * * Burden covered under OMB Control Number 1010-0140 (expires 10/31/2006). Burden covered under § 210.52. 206.181(c) How do I establish processing costs for dual accounting purposes when I do not process the gas?
(c)A proposed comparable processing fee submitted to either the tribe and MMS (for tribal leases) or MMS (for allotted leases) with your supporting documentation submitted to MMS. If MMS does not take action on your proposal within 120 days, the proposal will be deemed to be denied and subject to appeal to the MMS Director under 30 CFR part 290. 40 1 40 Total Burden 210 1,276 *Estimated Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping “Non-hour” Cost Burden:* We have identified no “non-hour” cost burdens. *Public Disclosure Statement:* The PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.* ) provides that an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. *Comments:* Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA requires each agency “* * * to provide notice * * * and otherwise consult with members of the public and affected agencies concerning each proposed collection of information * * *.” Agencies must specifically solicit comments to:
(a)Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the agency to perform its duties, including whether the information is useful;
(b)evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information;
(c)enhance the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(d)minimize the burden on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. To comply with the public consultation process, we published a notice in the **Federal Register** on June 14, 2005 (70 FR 34494), announcing that we would submit this ICR to OMB for approval. The notice provided the required 60-day comment period. We received no comments in response to the notice. If you wish to comment in response to this notice, you may send your comments to the offices listed under the ADDRESSES section of this notice. The OMB has up to 60 days to approve or disapprove the information collection but may respond after 30 days. Therefore, to ensure maximum consideration, OMB should receive public comments by May 26, 2006. Public Comment Policy: We will post all comments in response to this notice on our Web site at *http://www.mrm.mms.gov/Laws_R_D/InfoColl/InfoColCom.htm* . We will also make copies of the comments available for public review, including names and addresses of respondents, during regular business hours at our offices in Lakewood, Colorado. Upon request, we will withhold an individual respondent's home address from the public record, as allowable by law. There also may be circumstances in which we would withhold a respondent's identity, as allowable by law. If you request that we withhold your name and/or address, state your request prominently at the beginning of your comment. However, we will not consider anonymous comments. We will make all submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or businesses, available for public inspection in their entirety. MMS Information Collection Clearance Officer: Arlene Bajusz
(202)208-7744. Dated: February 15, 2006. Lucy Querques Denett, Associate Director for Minerals Revenue Management. [FR Doc. E6-6208 Filed 4-25-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service National Register of Historic Places; Notification of Pending Nominations and Related Actions Nominations for the following properties being considered for listing or related actions in the National Register were received by the National Park Service before April 8, 2006. Pursuant to § 60.13 of 36 CFR part 60 written comments concerning the significance of these properties under the National Register criteria for evaluation may be forwarded by United States Postal Service, to the National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C St. NW., 2280, Washington, DC 20240; by all other carriers, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1201 Eye St., NW., 8th floor, Washington, DC 20005; or by fax, 202-371-6447. Written or faxed comments should be submitted by May 11, 2006. John W. Roberts, Acting Chief, National Register/National Historic Landmarks Program. KANSAS Atchison County Bolman, George T. and Minnie Searles, House, 418 N. 4th St., Atchison, 06000385 Braun, Henry, House, 1307 Division St., Atchison, 06000387 Edmiston, James M., House, 311 S. 7th St., Atchison, 06000386 Horan, Michael J. and Mattie, House, 822 N. 4th St., Atchison, 06000384 Waggener, Balie P., House, 415 W. Riley St., Atchison, 06000388 Johnson County Loomis Historic District, 8325 Johnson Dr., 5900 Hadley, 5923 Hadley, Merriam, 06000390 Sedgwick County Ellis—Singleton Building, 221 S. Broadway, Wichita, 06000389 Stafford County Farmers National Bank, 100 N. Main, Stafford, 06000392 Larabee, Nora E., Memorial Library, 108 N. Union St., Stafford, 06000391 Trego County Wilcox School—District 29, (Public Schools of Kansas MPS) Rural Route —15 mi. S. of WaKeeney on KS 283, Ransom, 06000393 MAINE Cumberland County Everett Chambers, 47-55 Oak St., Portland, 06000397 Kennebec County Grant, William F., House, 869 Main St., North Vassalboro, 06000396 Moody Mansion, ME 194, across from the jct. with Hanley Rd., Pittston, 6000394 Washington County Devils Head Site, Address Restricted, Calais, 06000395 MASSACHUSETTS Middlesex County West School, 106 Bedford St., Burlington, 06000398 Worcester County Aldrich, Nathan C., House and Resthaven Chapel, 111 Providence St., Mendon, 06000399 Indian Cemetery, Old, 50 Cottage St., West Brookfield, 06000400 West Brookfield Center Historic District (Boundary Increase), Central, Milk, Mechanic, Sherman, Front and Ware Sts., Long Hill, Old Long Hill Rd., Railroad, Freight House Aves., West Brookfield, 06000401 MICHIGAN Bay County Elm Lawn Cemetery, 300 Ridge Rd., Bay City, 06000404 Oakland County Hilzinger Block, 106-110 S. Main St., Royal Oak, 06000403 Washtenaw County Goss, Arnold and Gertrude, House, 3215 W. Dobson Place, Ann Arbor, 06000402 Wayne County Annapolis Park Historic District, Julius, Matthew, Hanover, Farnum, Alan, and Paul, Westland, 06000405 OREGON Multnomah County Mallory Hotel, 729 SW. 15th Ave., Portland, 06000406 VIRGINIA Albemarle County Estes Farm, 6185 Estes Ln., Dyke, 06000409 Halifax County Cove, The, 5059 Cove Rd., Harrisburg, 06000407 Loudoun County Myrtle Hall Farm, 19305 Ridgeside Rd., Bluemont, 06000408 A request for a MOVE has been made for the following resource: MINNESOTA Sherburne County Fox, Herbert M., House U.S. 10 NW. of Becker Becker vicinity, 80002175 [FR Doc. E6-6209 Filed 4-25-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312-51-P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service National Register of Historic Places; Notification of Pending Nominations and Related Actions Nominations for the following properties being considered for listing or related actions in the National Register were received by the National Park Service before April 15, 2006. Pursuant to § 60.13 of 36 CFR part 60 written comments concerning the significance of these properties under the National Register criteria for evaluation may be forwarded by United States Postal Service, to the National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C St., NW., 2280, Washington, DC 20240; by all other carriers, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1201 Eye St., NW., 8th floor, Washington, DC 20005; or by fax, 202-371-6447. Written or faxed comments should be submitted by May 11, 2006. John W. Roberts, Acting Chief, National Register/National Historic Landmarks Program. ARKANSAS Carroll County Carroll County Poor Farm Cemetery, Address Restricted, Pleasant Valley, 06000412 Clark County Maumelle Ordnance Works Bunker #4, 4 Willastein Dr., Maumelle, 06000417 Cross County South Elementary School, 711 E. Union Ave., Wynne, 06000419 Jefferson County McDonald's Store #433 Sign, 1300 S. Main St., Pine Bluff, 06000411 St. Louis San Francisco (Frisco) Railway Coach #661, 2815 Dixie Woods Dr., Pine Bluff, 06000413 Logan County Arkansas Tuberculosis Sanatorium Historic District, East end of AR 116 S, Booneville, 06000414 Madison County St. Paul School Building, (Public Schools in the Ozarks MPS) 200 W 4th St., St. Paul, 06000416 Mississippi County Blytheville Commercial Historic District, Main St. bet. 5th and Franklin Sts., Ash St. bet. 5th and 2nd Sts., Blytheville, 06000421 Garden Point Cemetery, 4682 West AR 140, Etowah, 06000415 Pope County First Christian Church, 103 S. Boston Ave., Russellville, 06000418 Pulaski County Clayborn, John Henry, House, 1800 Marshall, Little Rock, 06000420 Van Buren County Clinton Commercial Historic District, Roughly bounded by Town Branch Creek and by AR 65B, Clinton, 06000410 HAWAII Honolulu County Holt, Lemon Wond, House, 3704 Anuhea St., Honolulu, 06000422 IOWA Muscatine County Downtown Commercial Historic District, (Muscatine, Iowa MPS) Roughly nine blks centered on 2nd St. bet. Pine and Mulberry, Muscatine, 06000423 MINNESOTA Pope County Little Falls and Dakota Depot, Depot Ln., Starbuck, 06000424 MONTANA Lewis and Clark County Home of Peace, Alexander St. bet. Brady St. and Custer Ave., Helena, 06000425 Madison County Thexton Ranch, 335 Vaney Rd., Ennis, 06000426 NORTH CAROLINA Forsyth County Wachovia Building (Boundary Increase), 301 N. Main St., Winston-Salem, 06000433 PENNSYLVANIA Berks County Willson, Thomas A. and Co., 201 Washington St., Reading, 06000428 Lancaster County Ephrata Commercial Historic District, portions of West Main, East Main, North State, South State Sts., and Washington Ave., Ephrata, 06000427 Speedwell Forge Mansion, 465 Speedwell Forge Rd., Elizabeth Township, 06000429 Philadelphia County Germantown Grammar School (Boundary Increase), (Philadelphia Public Schools TR) 45 W. Haines St., Philadelphia, 06000430 Wyoming County Noxen School, School St., Noxen Township, 06000431 UTAH Weber County US Forest Service Building, (Ogden Art Deco Building TR) 507 25th St., Ogden, 06000432 A request for REMOVAL has been made for the following resource: ARKANSAS Pulaski County Wolf Bayou Bridge, (Historic Bridges of Arkansas MPS) Pulaski County Road 85, Scott vicinity, 04000502 [FR Doc. E6-6211 Filed 4-25-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312-51-P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service Notice of Inventory Completion: American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice. Notice is here given in accordance with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3003, of the completion of an inventory of human remains in the possession of the American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY. The human remains were collected from North Dakota. This notice is published as part of the National Park Service's administrative responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 U.S.C. 3003 (d)(3). The determinations in this notice are the sole responsibility of the museum, institution, or Federal agency that has control of the Native American human remains. The National Park Service is not responsible for the determinations in this notice. A detailed assessment of the human remains was made by American Museum of Natural History professional staff in consultation with representatives of the Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation, North Dakota. In 1909, human remains representing a minimum of one individual were collected from North Dakota, by Rev. Gilbert L. Wilson during an American Museum of Natural History expedition. No known individual was identified. No associated funerary objects are present. The individual has been identified as Native American based on the catalog description, which states that the remains are “Mandan-Hidatsa.” Officials of the American Museum of Natural History have determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (9-10), the human remains described above represent the physical remains of one individual of Native American ancestry. Officials of the American Museum of Natural History also have determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (2), there is a relationship of shared group identity that can be reasonably traced between the Native American human remains and the Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation, North Dakota. Representatives of any other Indian tribe that believes itself to be culturally affiliated with the human remains should contact Nell Murphy, Director of Cultural Resources, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024-5192, telephone
(212)769-5837, before May 26, 2006. Repatriation of the human remains to the Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation, North Dakota may proceed after that date if no additional claimants come forward. The American Museum of Natural History is responsible for notifying the Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation, North Dakota that this notice has been published. Dated: April 3, 2006. Sherry Hutt, Manager, National NAGPRA Program. [FR Doc. E6-6262 Filed 4-25-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312-50-S DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service Notice of Inventory Completion: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Western Archeological and Conservation Center, Tucson, AZ AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice. Notice is here given in accordance with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3003, of the completion of an inventory of human remains and associated funerary objects in the control of the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Western Archeological and Conservation Center, Tucson, AZ. The human remains and cultural items were removed from various sites in Arizona. This notice is published as part of the National Park Service's administrative responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 U.S.C. 3003 (d)(3). The determinations in this notice are the sole responsibility of the Chief, Museum Collections Repository, Western Archeological and Conservation Center. A detailed assessment of the human remains and associated funerary objects was made by Western Archeological and Conservation Center professional staff in consultation with representatives of the Gila River Indian Community of the Gila River Indian Reservation, Arizona; Hopi Tribe of Arizona; Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community of the Salt River Reservation, Arizona; Tohono O'odham Nation of Arizona; and Zuni Tribe of the Zuni Reservation, New Mexico. Members of the Ak Chin Indian Community of the Maricopa (Ak Chin) Indian Reservation, Arizona were contacted, but did not attend the consultation meeting and were represented by members of the Gila River Indian Community of the Gila River Indian Reservation, Arizona. In 1956, human remains representing a minimum of one individual were donated to the National Park Service by Dr. Cyril M. Cron. The cremated remains were found near Bylas in Graham County, AZ. No known individuals were identified. The two associated funerary objects are one Gila Red bowl and one Gila Red jar. The jar and bowl date the cremation to the Classic period of the Hohokam or Salado cultural tradition (A.D. 1200-1450). In 1956, human remains representing a minimum of two individuals were donated to the National Park Service by Dr. Cyril M. Cron. The cremated remains were found near Phoenix in Maricopa County, AZ. No known individuals were identified. The two associated funerary objects are one Gila Red bowl and one Gila Red jar. The jar and bowl date the cremation to the Classic period of the Hohokam or Salado cultural tradition (A.D. 1200-1450). In 1956, human remains and associated funerary objects from Tonto National Monument's Upper Ruin site in Gila County, AZ, were donated to the National Park Service by Cyril M. Cron. The human remains and associated funerary objects appear in Tonto National Monument's Notice of Inventory Completion published in the **Federal Register** on Wednesday, February 22, 2006 (FR Doc. E6-2477, pages 9152-9154). In 1956, human remains representing a minimum of two individuals were removed from two separate sites in Gila County, AZ, during a legally authorized survey under the direction of National Park Service archeologist Raymond S. Brandes. The locations or descriptions of the sites were not included in the survey report. No known individuals were identified. No associated funerary objects are present. Based on diagnostic artifacts found at the sites the human remains are attributed to the Classic Period, Salado cultural tradition (A.D. 1200-1450). In 1958, human remains representing a minimum of seven individuals were removed from the Gila Pueblo site in Gila County, AZ, during legally authorized excavations under the direction of National Park Service archeologist Joel Shiner. The Gila Pueblo site was acquired by the National Park Service in 1952 and remained under National Park Service control until 1972 when it was transferred to Eastern Arizona College. No known individuals were identified. The two associated funerary objects are one Classic Period Salado miniature bowl and one copper bell. Based on the funerary objects as well as artifacts found elsewhere on the site, the human remains are attributed to the Gila phase of the Classic Period, Salado cultural tradition (A.D. 1300-1450). In 1968, human remains representing two individuals were removed from the Togetzoge site in Pinal County, AZ. No known individuals were identified. No associated funerary objects are present. Based on diagnostic artifacts from the site the human remains are attributed to the Classic Period, Salado cultural tradition (A.D. 1200-1450). The Togetzoge site is located on private property. Records do not indicate how the human remains came into the possession of the National Park Service. In 1970, human remains representing a minimum of two individuals were removed from the Hagen site in Gila County, AZ, during legally authorized excavations under the direction of National Park Service archeologist Jon N. Young. No known individuals were identified. No associated funerary objects are present. Based on diagnostic artifacts recovered from the site the human remains are attributed to the Gila phase of the Classic Period, Salado cultural tradition (A.D. 1300-1450). In 1990, cremated human remains representing a minimum of one individual were discovered in the collections storage area. No documentation has been located regarding the location or description of the site from which the human remains were removed. No known individuals were identified. The 159 associated funerary objects are 148 beads and 1 bag of beads, 9 bone rings, and 1 bird claw. Similarities between the human remains and associated funerary objects and other items in the collection indicate that, more likely than not, they were removed from a site in central Arizona and are related to the Hohokam or Salado cultural tradition. The Hohokam were a sedentary agricultural people developing out of the local Archaic population. Hohokam settlement pattern was predominantly of the rancheria type, with pithouse or house-in-pit architecture. Ballcourts are often found at Hohokam sites. Pit or urn cremations were the predominant burial practice prior to A.D. 1100. Extended supine inhumations then became more prevalent, completely replacing cremations by A.D. 1300. There was a pronounced, though far from complete, decline in population after about A.D. 1350. The “Salado cultural tradition” or “Salado phenomenon,” as defined by recent archeological research, is a term that has invoked archeological debate since the 1930s. For purposes of this notice, a primary geographic area of the Salado is located between the desert-dwelling Hohokam in southern Arizona and puebloan groups of the mountain areas to the north and east. However, evidence of Salado ceramic traditions have been discovered throughout the Southwest and as far south as Mexico. Salado sites often contain a variety of architectural styles and material culture that represent both the Hohokam and ancestral Puebloan traditions. For example, both architectural styles have been found within single sites in the Tonto Basin, suggesting close mixing between the two groups. Recent research suggests that the intermixing of these two groups may have occurred in the late 13th century to the middle part of the 15th century. Overall, the archeological evidence, including material culture, architectural styles, and burial practices, indicates affiliation with a number of contemporary indigenous groups including the Ak Chin Indian Community of the Maricopa (Ak Chin) Indian Reservation, Arizona; Gila River Indian Community of the Gila River Indian Reservation, Arizona; Hopi Tribe of Arizona; Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community of the Salt River Reservation, Arizona; Tohono O'odham Nation of Arizona; and Zuni Tribe of the Zuni Reservation, New Mexico. In addition to the archeological evidence, oral traditions of these six tribes support ancestral ties to these cultural traditions. In 1990, representatives of the Ak Chin Indian Community of the Maricopa (Ak Chin) Indian Reservation, Arizona; Gila River Indian Community of the Gila River Indian Reservation, Arizona; Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community of the Salt River Reservation, Arizona; and Tohono O'odham Nation of Arizona issued a joint policy statement claiming ancestral ties to the Hohokam and Salado cultural traditions. In 1994, representatives of the Hopi Tribe of Arizona issued a statement claiming cultural affiliation with Hohokam and Salado cultural traditions. In 1995, representatives of the Zuni Tribe of the Zuni Reservation, New Mexico issued a statement claiming cultural affiliation with the Hohokam and Salado cultural traditions. Officials of the Western Archeological and Conservation Center have determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (9-10), the human remains described above represent the physical remains of 17 individuals of Native American ancestry. Officials of the Western Archeological and Conservation Center also have determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (3)(A), the 165 objects described above are reasonably believed to have been placed with or near individual human remains at the time of death or later as part of the death rite or ceremony. Lastly, officials of the Western Archeological and Conservation Center have determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (2), there is a relationship of shared group identity that can be reasonably traced between the Native American human remains and associated funerary objects and the Ak Chin Indian Community of the Maricopa (Ak Chin) Indian Reservation, Arizona; Gila River Indian Community of the Gila River Indian Reservation, Arizona; Hopi Tribe of Arizona; Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community of the Salt River Reservation, Arizona; Tohono O'odham Nation of Arizona; and Zuni Tribe of the Zuni Reservation, New Mexico. Representatives of any other Indian tribe that believes itself to be culturally affiliated with the human remains and associated funerary objects should contact Dr. Stephanie H. Rodeffer, Chief, Museum Collections Repository, Western Archeological and Conservation Center, 255 N. Commerce Park Loop, Tucson, AZ 85745, telephone
(520)670-6501, before May 26, 2006. Repatriation of the human remains and associated funerary objects to the Ak Chin Indian Community of the Maricopa (Ak Chin) Indian Reservation, Arizona; Gila River Indian Community of the Gila River Indian Reservation, Arizona; Hopi Tribe of Arizona; Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community of the Salt River Reservation, Arizona; Tohono O'odham Nation of Arizona; and Zuni Tribe of the Zuni Reservation, New Mexico may proceed after that date if no additional claimants come forward. The Western Archeological and Conservation Center is responsible for notifying the Ak Chin Indian Community of the Maricopa (Ak Chin) Indian Reservation, Arizona; Gila River Indian Community of the Gila River Indian Reservation, Arizona; Hopi Tribe of Arizona; Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community of the Salt River Reservation, Arizona; Tohono O'odham Nation of Arizona; and Zuni Tribe of the Zuni Reservation, New Mexico that this notice has been published. Dated: March 14, 2006. Sherry Hutt, Manager, National NAGPRA Program. [FR Doc. E6-6261 Filed 4-25-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312-50-S DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service Notice of Inventory Completion: South Dakota State Historical Society, Archaeological Research Center, Rapid City, SD AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice. Notice is here given in accordance with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3003, of the completion of an inventory of human remains and associated funerary objects in the possession of the South Dakota State Historical Society, Archaeological Research Center, Rapid City, SD. The human remains and associated funerary objects were removed from eastern, central, and northwestern South Dakota, and southeastern Montana. This notice is published as part of the National Park Service's administrative responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 U.S.C. 3003
(3)(d). The determinations in this notice are the sole responsibility of the museum, institution, or Federal agency that has control of the Native American human remains and associated funerary objects. The National Park Service is not responsible for the determinations in this notice. A detailed assessment of the human remains was made by the Archaeological Research Center professional staff in consultation with representatives of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe of the Cheyenne River Reservation, South Dakota; Crow Creek Sioux Tribe of the Crow Creek Reservation, South Dakota; Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe of South Dakota; Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma; Lower Sioux Indian Community in the State of Minnesota; Northern Cheyenne Tribe of the Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation, Montana; Oglala Sioux Tribe of the Pine Ridge Reservation, South Dakota; Omaha Tribe of Nebraska; Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Indians, Oklahoma; Prairie Island Indian Community in the State of Minnesota; Rosebud Sioux Tribe of the Rosebud Indian Reservation, South Dakota; Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa; Santee Sioux Nation, Nebraska; Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse Reservation, South Dakota; Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation, North Dakota; Upper Sioux Indian Community, Minnesota; and Yankton Sioux Tribe of South Dakota. In 1980, human remains representing a minimum of one individual were removed from a pothunter's back dirt on a mound, 39BE46/80-70, in Beadle County, SD, during the James River Survey by Archaeological Research Center personnel. The human remains were curated at the Archaeological Research Center. No known individual was identified. The five associated funerary objects are four flakes and one mollusk shell fragment. Mounds in the James River Valley date to the Woodland period (A.D. 1-1250). In 1998, human remains representing a minimum of six individuals were removed from a burial pit, 39BN124/99-63, by Archaeological Research Center personnel in Brown County, SD. The pit was disturbed by contractors mining gravel on private land. The human remains were curated at the Archaeological Research Center. No known individuals were identified. No associated funerary objects are present. Morphologically, the human remains are similar to other human remains from the Late Woodland period (A.D. 500-1400). In 1980, human remains representing a minimum of two individuals were removed from Ufford Mounds, 39CL2/97-91, in Clay County, SD, by South Dakota State Historical Preservation Office personnel. The human remains were exposed during agricultural activities. The human remains were curated at the W.H. Over Museum in Vermillion, SD, and transferred to the Archaeological Research Center in 1997. No known individuals were identified. No associated funerary objects are present. Earlier museum excavations at the Ufford Mounds support a date of Late Woodland or Initial Middle Missouri period (A.D. 500-1350). In 1990, human remains representing a minimum of one individual were removed from a hill slope above a lake, 39CD63/90-112, in Codington County, SD. A local pathologist determined that the human remains were not of forensic significance. The Codington County Sheriff's Department transferred the human remains to the Archaeological Research Center. No known individual was identified. No associated funerary objects are present. Based on the physical condition of the human remains they were most likely interred over 100 years ago. The human remains are most likely Native American because of their burial context and tooth wear pattern. At an unknown date, human remains representing a minimum of four individuals were removed from the Winter site, 39DE5/94-761, in Deuel County, SD. In 1988, the human remains were donated to Roy Lake State Park, Marshall County, SD. In 1994, the human remains were transferred to the Archaeological Research Center. No known individuals were identified. No associated funerary objects are present. The Winter site dates from Paleo-Indian to the Late Prehistoric period (10,000 B.C.- A.D. 1700). In 1989, human remains representing a minimum of one individual were removed from a stone-covered burial pit, 39HD73/90-109, by a farmer digging for rocks in Hand County, SD. A physical anthropologist determined that the human remains were not of forensic significance. The Hand County Sheriff's Department transferred the human remains to the Archaeological Research Center. No known individual was identified. No associated funerary objects are present. The burial most likely dates to A.D. 990-1290 based on dating techniques done on behalf of the Hand County Sheriff's Department. In 1979, human remains representing a minimum of one individual were discovered eroding out of a talus slope, 39HN129/81-53, during a stock dam check in Harding County, SD, and collected by South Dakota Department of Agriculture personnel. In 1981, the human remains were transferred to the Archaeological Research Center. No known individual was identified. No associated funerary objects are present. In the mid-twentieth century, human remains representing a minimum of one individual were removed from DeGrey site, 39HU205/92-202, in Hughes County, SD, by a landowner. At an unknown date, the human remains were transferred to the Archaeological Research Center. No further documentation was found regarding the collection or transfer of the human remains. No known individual was identified. No associated funerary objects are present. The DeGrey site dates to the Woodland, Initial, and Extended Coalescent periods (A.D. 1-1675). In 1941, human remains representing a minimum of one individual were removed from Burial Pit 1 at the Scalp Creek site, 39GR1/94-199, in Gregory County, SD, by E.E. Meleen of the W.H. Over Museum, as part of a Works Projects Administration project. The human remains were curated at the W.H. Over Museum and transferred to the Archaeological Research Center in 1974. No known individual was identified. The one associated funerary object is a tanned hide fragment. The Scalp Creek site dates to the Late Woodland period (A.D. 800-1200) and the Extended Coalescent Tradition (A.D. 1500-1675). In 1929, human remains representing a minimum of three individuals were removed from Montrose Mounds, 39MK1/93-13, in McCook County, SD, during road construction activities. The human remains were curated at the W.H. Over Museum and transferred to the Archaeological Research Center in 1974. No known individuals were identified. No associated funerary objects are present. The Montrose Mounds date to the Woodland period (A.D. 1-1000). Between 1930 to 1950, human remains representing a minimum of six individuals were discovered in Perkins County, SD, and donated to Fred Jennewein, a local museum owner. In 1980, the Jennewein collection was donated to the Cultural Heritage Center, Pierre, SD. In the 1990s, the human remains from the Jennewein collection were transferred to Archaeological Research Center and accessioned into the museum's collections (39PE/90-108, 94-749 to 94-752, and 96-200). No known individuals were identified. No associated funerary objects are present. Three of the individuals date to the Late Prehistoric period (A.D. 500-1750) and the other three individuals have no known date. In 1935, human remains representing a minimum of one individual were discovered near Wilmot, 39RO/97-137, Roberts County, SD, by Mr. Jenson. The human remains were donated by Mr. Jenson to the W.H. Over Museum later that same year. In 1935, the W. H. Over Museum loaned the human remains to Dr. A.E. Jenks of the University of Minnesota. In 1997, the University of Minnesota Wilford Archaeology Lab found the human remains in their collections and transferred them to the Archaeological Research Center. No known individual was identified. The one associated funerary object is a radius. The human remains date to the Archaic period (6000 B.C-A.D. 1). In 1923, human remains representing a minimum of one individual were removed from Daugherty Mounds, 39RO10/92-210B, in Roberts County, SD, by W.H. Over Museum personnel. In 1974, the human remains were transferred to the Archaeological Research Center. No known individual was identified. The two associated funerary objects are a copper bead and a small bone wristlet. The Daugherty Mounds date to the Woodland period (A.D. 500-1100). In 1994, human remains representing a minimum of one individual were exposed by road construction above Big Stone Lake, 39RO86/95-22, in Roberts County, SD, and collected by South Dakota's State Archaeologist. The human remains were curated at the Archaeological Research Center. No known individual was identified. No associated funerary objects are present. The human remains probably date to the Plains Village period (A.D. 900-1700) based on ceramics found in the vicinity, but not in association with the burial. In 1979, human remains representing a minimum of one individual were found along the Missouri River between Cow and Spring Creeks, 39SL/98-175, in Sully County, SD. The human remains were sent to the South Dakota Division of Criminal Investigations and transferred to the Archaeological Research Center at an unknown date. No known individual was identified. No associated funerary objects are present. In 1869, human remains representing a minimum of one individual were discovered at an unknown location in southeastern Montana. In 1939, E.C. Coleman of Spearfish, SD, loaned the human remains to the Adams Museum, Deadwood, SD. The human remains were curated by the Adams Museum until 1995, when they were transferred to the Archaeological Research Center and accessioned into the museum's collections (24/97-32). No known individual was identified. The three associated funerary objects are copper coiled earrings. The human remains date to the Historic period (post A.D. 1750). At an unknown date, human remains representing a minimum of 14 individuals were brought to the Dacotah Prairie Museum, Aberdeen, Brown County, SD. The Dacotah Prairie Museum had no documentation related to the human remains. In 1993, the human remains were transferred to the Archaeological Research Center and accessioned into the museum's collections (93-10A). No known individuals were identified. No associated funerary objects are present. Based on morphological features and post-mortem treatment the human remains date to the Northeast Plains Woodland period (400 B.C.- A.D. 1250). In 1965, human remains representing a minimum of one individual were donated to the Sioux City Public Museum, IA, by George Olson. The museum's accession record states that the human remains were found 9 miles from Miles City, SD, however, no record of this city has ever been found. In 1994, the Sioux City Public Museum transferred the human remains to the Archaeological Research Center and accessioned into the museum's collections (94-748). No known individual was identified. No associated funerary objects are present. The morphological features of the cranium suggest a date of Middle Plains Woodland period (A.D. 400-900). At an unknown date, human remains representing a minimum of 16 individuals were accessioned into the collections at the W.H. Over Museum. In 1997, the human remains were transferred to the Archaeological Research Center and accessioned into the museum's collections (97-119, 97-122 to 7, 97-131 to 6, and 99-288). No known individuals were identified. The four associated funerary objects are one canine tooth, one clay ball, one fish bone, and one seed. One individual dates to the Historic period (post A.D. 1850). The other 15 individuals have no provenience and are unassignable to a cultural period. In 2000, human remains representing a minimum of six individuals were anonymously donated to Augustana College, Sioux Falls, SD, and then transferred to the Archaeological Research Center and accessioned into the museum's collections (00-38 to 41). No known individuals were identified. No associated funerary objects are present. The human remains have no provenience and are unassignable to a cultural period. A physical anthropological assessment of the human remains for the 70 individuals described above resulted in a determination that the individuals are most likely Native American. An evaluation by professional staff at the Archaeological Research Center of the manner and location of burial, and types of associated funerary objects found with the individuals also supports an identification of the human remains as Native American and are culturally unidentifiable to any present-day Indian tribe. The map of Indian Land Areas Judicially Established in 1978 establishes most of South Dakota and large parts of Minnesota, and adjacent portions of North Dakota, Montana, Wyoming, Nebraska, and Iowa as historically Sioux aboriginal lands. The Sioux are represented today by the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe of the Cheyenne River Reservation, South Dakota; Crow Creek Sioux Tribe of the Crow Creek Reservation, South Dakota; Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe of South Dakota; Lower Sioux Indian Community in the State of Minnesota; Oglala Sioux Tribe of the Pine Ridge Reservation, South Dakota; Prairie Island Indian Community in the State of Minnesota; Rosebud Sioux Tribe of the Rosebud Indian Reservation, South Dakota; Santee Sioux Nation, Nebraska; Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse Reservation, South Dakota; Upper Sioux Indian Community, Minnesota; and Yankton Sioux Tribe of South Dakota. Based on historical documents, oral history, and archeological data, the Cheyenne, Iowa, Omaha, Otoe & Missouria, and Sac & Fox people also occupied what is now present-day South Dakota and the surrounding region, and are represented today by the Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma; Northern Cheyenne Tribe of the Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation, Montana; Omaha Tribe of Nebraska; Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Indians, Oklahoma; Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa; and Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation, North Dakota. Officials of the Archaeological Research Center have determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (9-10), the human remains described above represent the physical remains of 70 individuals of Native American ancestry. Officials of the Archaeological Research Center also have determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (3)(A), the 11 objects described above are reasonably believed to have been placed with or near individual human remains at the time of death or later as part of the death rite or ceremony. Lastly, officials of the Archaeological Research Center have determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (2), a relationship of shared group identity cannot reasonably be traced between the Native American human remains and associated funerary objects and any present-day Indian tribe. In November 2005, the Archaeological Research Center requested that the Review Committee recommend disposition of the human remains of 70 culturally unidentifiable human remains and 11 associated funerary objects to the Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe of South Dakota on behalf of themselves and the Indian tribes listed above that comprise a consortium of 17 Indian tribes. The Review Committee considered the proposal at its November 2005 meeting in Albuquerque, NM, and recommended disposition of the human remains and associated funerary objects to the Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe of South Dakota, on behalf of Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe of the Cheyenne River Reservation, South Dakota; Crow Creek Sioux Tribe of the Crow Creek Reservation, South Dakota; Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe of South Dakota; Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma; Lower Sioux Indian Community in the State of Minnesota; Northern Cheyenne Tribe of the Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation, Montana; Oglala Sioux Tribe of the Pine Ridge Reservation, South Dakota; Omaha Tribe of Nebraska; Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Indians, Oklahoma; Prairie Island Indian Community in the State of Minnesota; Rosebud Sioux Tribe of the Rosebud Indian Reservation, South Dakota; Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa; Santee Sioux Nation, Nebraska; Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse Reservation, South Dakota; Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation, North Dakota; Upper Sioux Indian Community, Minnesota; and Yankton Sioux Tribe of South Dakota. The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Review Committee (Review Committee) is responsible for recommending specific actions for disposition of culturally unidentifiable human remains. In July 2003, the Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe of South Dakota submitted a request to the Archaeological Research Center for repatriation of the culturally unidentifiable human remains to themselves, on behalf of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe of the Cheyenne River Reservation, South Dakota; Crow Creek Sioux Tribe of the Crow Creek Reservation, South Dakota; Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe of South Dakota; Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma; Lower Sioux Indian Community in the State of Minnesota; Northern Cheyenne Tribe of the Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation, Montana; Oglala Sioux Tribe of the Pine Ridge Reservation, South Dakota; Omaha Tribe of Nebraska; Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Indians, Oklahoma; Prairie Island Indian Community in the State of Minnesota; Rosebud Sioux Tribe of the Rosebud Indian Reservation, South Dakota; Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa; Santee Sioux Nation, Nebraska; Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse Reservation, South Dakota; Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation, North Dakota; Upper Sioux Indian Community, Minnesota; and Yankton Sioux Tribe of South Dakota. A November 23, 2005, letter from the Designated Federal Officer, on behalf of the chair of the Review Committee, to the Archaeological Research Center transmitted the Review Committee's recommendation that the Archaeological Research Center effect disposition of the physical remains of 70 culturally unidentifiable human remains and 11 associated funerary objects to the Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe of South Dakota on behalf of the 17 Indian tribes listed above contingent on the publication of a Notice of Inventory Completion in the **Federal Register** . This notice fulfills that requirement. Representatives of any Indian tribe that believes itself to be culturally affiliated with the human remains and associated funerary objects should contact Renee M. Boen, Repository Manager, Archaeological Research Center, 2425 E. St. Charles St., Rapid City, SD 57703, telephone
(605)394-1936, before May 26, 2006. Disposition of the human remains and associated funerary objects to the Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe of South Dakota on behalf of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe of the Cheyenne River Reservation, South Dakota; Crow Creek Sioux Tribe of the Crow Creek Reservation, South Dakota; Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma; Lower Sioux Indian Community in the State of Minnesota; Northern Cheyenne Tribe of the Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation, Montana; Oglala Sioux Tribe of the Pine Ridge Reservation, South Dakota; Omaha Tribe of Nebraska; Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Indians, Oklahoma; Prairie Island Indian Community in the State of Minnesota; Rosebud Sioux Tribe of the Rosebud Indian Reservation, South Dakota; Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa; Santee Sioux Nation, Nebraska; Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse Reservation, South Dakota; Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation, North Dakota; Upper Sioux Indian Community, Minnesota; Yankton Sioux Tribe of South Dakota; and themselves, may proceed after that date if no additional claimants come forward. The Archaeological Research Center is responsible for notifying the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe of the Cheyenne River Reservation, South Dakota; Crow Creek Sioux Tribe of the Crow Creek Reservation, South Dakota; Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe of South Dakota; Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma; Lower Sioux Indian Community in the State of Minnesota; Northern Cheyenne Tribe of the Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation, Montana; Oglala Sioux Tribe of the Pine Ridge Reservation, South Dakota; Omaha Tribe of Nebraska; Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Indians, Oklahoma; Prairie Island Indian Community in the State of Minnesota; Rosebud Sioux Tribe of the Rosebud Indian Reservation, South Dakota; Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa; Santee Sioux Nation, Nebraska; Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse Reservation, South Dakota; Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation, North Dakota; Upper Sioux Indian Community, Minnesota; and Yankton Sioux Tribe of South Dakota that this notice has been published. Dated: April 11, 2006. Sherry Hutt, Manager, National NAGPRA Program. [FR Doc. E6-6259 Filed 4-25-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312-50-S DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service Notice of Inventory Completion: U.S. Department of Defense, Army Corps of Engineers, Walla Walla District, Walla Walla, WA, and Museum of Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, and Nez Perce National Historical Park, Spaulding Visitor Center, Spaulding, ID AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice. Notice is here given in accordance with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3003, of the completion of an inventory of human remains and associated funerary objects in the control of the U.S. Department of Defense, Army Corps of Engineers, Walla Walla District, Walla Walla, WA, and in the possession of the Museum of Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, and Nez Perce National Historical Park, Spaulding Visitor Center, Spaulding, ID. The human remains and associated funerary objects were removed from the Palúus (Palus) Cemetery in Franklin County, WA. This notice is published as part of the National Park Service's administrative responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 U.S.C. 3003 (d)(3). The determinations in this notice are the sole responsibility of the museum, institution, or Federal agency that has control of the Native American human remains and associated funerary objects. The National Park Service is not responsible for the determinations in this notice. A detailed assessment of the human remains was made by the Army Corps of Engineers St. Louis District Mandatory Center of Expertise for the Curation and Management of Archaeological Collections professional staff and a detailed assessment of the associated funerary items was made by Museum of Anthropology, Washington State University professional staff in consultation with lineal descendants and representatives of the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation, Washington; Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, Washington; Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, Oregon; Nez Perce Tribe, Idaho; and Wanapum Band, a non-federally recognized Indian group. In 1964, human remains representing a minimum of 260 individuals were removed from the Palúus (Palus) Cemetery (45FR36B), Franklin County, WA, by Washington State University professional staff, under the direction of the Army Corps of Engineers, Walla Walla District. The excavation was undertaken to relocate the cemetery before flooding by the backwaters of dam construction. In March 1965, human remains representing an unknown number of individuals were re-interred on a hill overlooking the original burial site. The remainder of the human remains and associated funerary objects were housed at the University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, and Museum of Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA. In 2000, the human remains and associated funerary items at the University of Idaho were transferred to Washington State University. In 1995 and 2005, detailed assessments were done that determined human remains from the Palus Cemetery representing a minimum of 94 individuals are present in the extant collection. There are four known individuals identified. The four known individuals are Mrs. Helen Fisher, Chief Old Bones, and two other members of the Old Bones family. The remaining 90 individuals are unidentified. The 6,220 associated funerary objects are 1 Jefferson Peace Medal; 26 digging sticks; 8 arrow fragments; 1 axe head; 1 baby rattle; 2 beaded and studded vests; 10 beaded straps; 1 beaded jackknife with bone handle; 1 beaded leather ornament; 1 bone comb; 1 bone digging stick handle; 6 bird bone whistles; 3 bottle caps; 2 bottle openers; 1 bow; 1 brass candlestick ornament; 1 brass tube; 1 bridle bit; 18 bullet cartridges; 1 cannon ball; 28 ceramic objects; 1 ceramic cup and saucer set; 1 Chinese coin; 9 chipped stone bifaces; 60 chipped stone flakes; 2 chipped stone net sinkers; 6 projectile points; 7 chipped stone tools; 1 clay ornament; 1 cloth cap; 4 cobble cores or tools; 1 coin purse; 1 cold cream jar; 1 copper crucifix; 3 cradleboards; 2 crescent shaped leather pieces; 1 decorated bone handle; 3 dice; 3 drum sticks; 1 eye water bottle with yellow powder inside; 1 fabric coin purse; 4 fruit pits; 1 pair of scissors fused to a spoon; 12 glass bottles; 1 glass ball; 2 glass cups; 11 glass fragments; 1 glass lid; 2 glass ornaments; 1 glass pipe bowl; 1 glass swizzle stick; 3 hammerstones; 4 harmonicas; 1 horn comb; 1 horn spoon; 1 horse hair pillow; 1 ice pick; 7 metal spikes; 3 knives and leather sheaths; 3 lead balls; 36 leather belts; 1 leather coffin handle; 2 leather comb cases and combs; 11 leather pouches; 1 leather purse; 21 saddle rings and stirrups; 6 leather straps; 3 keys; 3 marbles; 4 harness fragments; 1 metal ball; 4 metal bead bracelets; 23 belt buckles; 4 bolts; 3 metal bowls; 135 metal bracelets; 1 shell and button ornament; 16 metal clasps; 1 metal clip; 4 metal coils; 12 metal combs; 1 metal compact; 5 metal containers; 3 metal cuff ornaments; 15 metal cups; 1 metal cylinder with chain; 1 metal dish; 1 metal epaulet; 1 metal finger guard; 1 metal flute; 1 metal fork; 1 metal grommet; 6 gun parts; 7 metal handles; 1 metal hinge; 2 metal knives; 1 metal ladle; 3 metal jar lids; 1 metal lighter; 1 metal loop; 1 metal object encased in leather; 12 metal ornaments; 1 metal pail; 1 metal picture frame fragment; 2 metal pipe bowl and stem; 1 metal purse; 65 metal rings; 40 metal spoons; 13 metal springs; 8 metal straight pins; 5 toys; 19 mirrors; 11 moccasins; 1 nipple topped maul; 3 notched arrow shafts; 2 pencils; 3 pestles; 15 plastic combs; 3 plastic pipe bowl and stems; 2 pocket knives; 1 kidney stone; 4 projectile point fragments; 32 quirts; 1 rosary; 1 rubber band; 12 safety pins; 13 pairs of scissors; 2 worked sticks; 1 shell comb; 367 shell ornaments; 1 stone bead; 1 stone fused to buckle; 1 stone mortar; 5 stone ornaments; 1 stone pipe bowl; 28 studded and beaded leather belts; 12 thread spools; 5 tweezers; 20 sticks with wrapping and lashing; 87 unidentified metal items; 6 unidentified modified bone items; 1 unidentified plastic item; 7 wooden combs; 1 wooden fan; 3 wooden gaming pieces; 5 wood and bone handles; 2 wooden ornaments; 4 wooden pipe stem fragments; 2 wooden spindles; 4 unidentified worked wood pieces; 359 lots wood fragments; 1 lot wound string; 7 lots yellow ochre; 286 lots glass, metal, shell, wood, plastic, and ceramic buttons; 2015 lots glass, metal, shell, and elk tooth beads; 39 lots bird and mammal remains; 12 lots animal hide and fur; 3 lots antler fragments; 16 lots antler tines; 32 lots bag residue; 47 lots basketry fragments; 2 lots bow fragments; 5 lots ceramic fragments; 3 lots coffin handles; 14 lots cordage; 20 lots cradleboard pieces; 1 lot curtain rings; 1 lot epaulet braid; 427 lots fabric; 10 lots feathers; 1 lot dish fragments; 316 lots leather, hide, and fur fragments; 2 lots insect remains; 23 lots saddle parts; 2 lots fabric, bead, thimble, and cordage masses; 96 lots matting; 34 lots metal bracelet fragments; 11 lots metal cans; 3 lots metal can fragments; 6 lots metal chain; 1 lot metal container fragments; 8 lots metal cup fragments; 8 lots metal discs; 1 lot metal dish and spoon fragments; 242 lot metal fragments; 1 lot metal hinge fragments; 30 lots metal ring fragments; 1 lot metal rivets and buckles; 22 lots metal spoon fragments; 16 lots metal studs; 1 lot metal tax tokens; 18 lots metal trunk hardware; 6 lots metal tubing; 1 lot watch gears; 12 lots mirror pieces; 4 lots moccasin fragments; 278 nails; 1 nested metal containers; 1 lot newspaper; 2 lots painted wood; 8 lots paper fragments; 2 lots plant remains; 1 lot gaming sticks; 1 lot music box parts; 20 lots red ochre; 1 lot reeds; 9 lots rolled brass tinklers; 1 lot rope; 2 lots rubber fragments; 18 lots safety pin fragments; 16 lots seeds; 3 lots shell ornament fragments; 1 lot shellfish remains; 2 lots shoe fragments; 24 lots small gauge metal chain; 9 lots small stones; 1 lot small wooden box parts; 4 lots soil samples; 4 lots spoon fragments; 3 lots string; 22 lots thimbles; 10 lots unidentified organic matter; 5 lots unidentified modified bone fragments; 15 lots unidentified organic materials; 2 lots wire; 4 lots wooden comb fragments; 10 lots wooden gaming stick fragments; 2 lots wooden gun stock fragments; 1 lot wooden matches; 13 lots of sticks; 83 bells; 6 lots bell fragments; and 2 lots worked wood. Based on osteological information and associated funerary objects the human remains from the Palus Cemetery have been determined to be Native American. The Palus Indian village area is composed of a cluster of sites located on the west side of the Palouse River and Snake River confluence in southeastern Washington. The sites are identified as 45FR36A, B, and C. Area A is a late prehistoric village, area B is a defined cemetery associated with the Palus village, and area C is an earlier housepit cluster. The occurrence of clearly defined burial areas near to, but set apart from, the village areas have been defined by anthropologists as a hallmark of the late prehistoric period on the lower Snake River (Leonhardy and Rice 1970). The earliest written account of the Palus village complex was made by Lewis and Clark who passed the mouth of the Palouse River and the unoccupied village on October 13, 1805 (Thwaites 1905). In 1812, Ross Cox, a Pacific Fur Company trader, documented his encampment at the Palus village (1957:89-91). The Palus village later became a stopping point for travelers moving through the Snake River and the interior Palouse country. Treaties were negotiated and signed as the Washington Territory expanded. Many Palus Indians were sent to the Indian Territory in Oklahoma after the Nez Perce War of 1877. In the final decade of the nineteenth century, the Palus Indians remaining on their traditional lands were surrounded by an expanse of settlers and began moving onto the Colville, Nez Perce, Umatilla, and Yakama reservations. By 1897, approximately 75 Palus Indians lived at Palus village. In the spring of 1905, a steamboat of American soldiers arrived at the village and many of the residents were removed. The few people who remained at Palus village included Chief Old Bones, his wife, and at least two of their children. In 1916, Chief Old Bones died and was buried in the Palus cemetery. His grave was marked with a headstone that remained identifiable at the time of the excavation. A wife and at least two children of Chief Old Bones were also buried at Palus next to the grave of Chief Old Bones. The last full-time resident of the Palus village was Mr. Sam Fisher. His wife, Mrs. Helen Fisher was the last individual buried in the cemetery following her death in 1944. Recent studies done by the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation, Washington; Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, Washington; Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, Oregon; and Nez Perce Tribe, Idaho, document that each tribe has cultural affiliation with the Palus Indians as a result of the dispersion of the Palus people to each of the reservations during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The cultural affiliation of all the tribes is further strengthened by living enrolled members that have documented ancestors buried at Palus. The correlation of these members with specific burials is not possible, except for Mr. Gordon Fisher, from the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reseration, Oregon, who traces his ancestry directly and without interruption to Mrs. Helen Fisher. There is another unnamed lineal descendant that can trace ancestry directly and without interruption to Chief Old Bones. The two lineal descendants have chosen not to submit a claim for the human remains and associated funerary objects, as documented in an agreement signed on February 13, 2006. Officials of the Army Corps of Engineers, Walla Walla District have determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (9-10), the human remains described above represent the physical remains of a minimum of 94 individuals of Native American ancestry. Officials of the Army Corps of Engineers, Walla Walla District also have determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (3)(A), the 6,220 objects described above are reasonably believed to have been placed with or near individual human remains at the time of death or later as part of the death rite or ceremony. Lastly, officials of the Army Corps of Engineers, Walla Walla District have determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), there is a relationship of shared group identity that can be reasonably traced between the Native American human remains and associated funerary objects and the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation, Washington; Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, Washington; Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, Oregon; and Nez Perce Tribe, Idaho. Any lineal descendant or representatives of any other Indian tribe that believes itself to be culturally affiliated with the human remains and associated funerary objects should contact Lieutenant Colonel Randy L. Glaeser, Commander, Walla Walla District Corps of Engineers, 201 North Third Avenue Walla Walla, WA 99362, telephone (509-527-7700), before May 26, 2006. Repatriation of the human remains and associated funerary objects to the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation, Washington; Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, Washington; Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, Oregon; and Nez Perce Tribe, Idaho may proceed after that date if no additional claimants come forward. The Army Corps of Engineers, Walla Walla District is responsible for notifying the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation, Washington; Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, Washington; Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, Oregon; Nez Perce Tribe, Idaho; and Wanapum Band, a non-federally recognized Indian group that this notice has been published. Dated: April 13, 2005 Sherry Hutt, Manager, National NAGPRA Program. [FR Doc. E6-6260 Filed 4-25-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312-50-S DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service Notice of Inventory Completion: American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice. Notice is here given in accordance with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3003, of the completion of an inventory of human remains in the possession of the American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY. The human remains were removed from Hancock County, ME. This notice is published as part of the National Park Service's administrative responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 U.S.C. 3003 (d)(3). The determinations in this notice are the sole responsibility of the museum, institution, or Federal agency that has control of the Native American human remains. The National Park Service is not responsible for the determinations in this notice. A detailed assessment of the human remains was made by American Museum of Natural History professional staff in consultation with representatives of the Penobscot Tribe of Maine. At an unknown date, human remains representing a minimum of two individuals were collected from a shell heap on Pond Island, Blue Hill Bay, in Hancock County, ME, during an excavation sponsored by the Wilson Museum, Castine, ME. The individual who collected the human remains is unknown. In 1965, the human remains were accessioned into the American Museum of Natural History collections as a gift from the Wilson Museum and Ms. Norman W. Doudiet. No known individuals were identified. No associated funerary objects are present. Geographic and temporal information suggest the human remains are from the postcontact territory of the Penobscot Indians. A radiocarbon date of 245120 years B.P. associated with the human remains places them in the postcontact period. During the postcontact period, the portion of Maine from which these human remains were recovered was part of the traditional territory of the Penobscot Indians. Officials of the American Museum of Natural History have determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (9-10), the human remains described above represent the physical remains of two individuals of Native American ancestry. Officials of the American Museum of Natural History also have determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (2), there is a relationship of shared group identity that can be reasonably traced between the Native American human remains and the Penobscot Tribe of Maine. Representatives of any other Indian tribe that believes itself to be culturally affiliated with the human remains should contact Nell Murphy, Director of Cultural Resources, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024-5192, telephone
(212)769-5837, before May 26, 2006. Repatriation of the human remains to the Penobscot Tribe of Maine may proceed after that date if no additional claimants come forward. The American Museum of Natural History is responsible for notifying the Penobscot Tribe of Maine that this notice has been published. Dated: March 31, 2006. Sherry Hutt, Manager, National NAGPRA Program. [FR Doc. E6-6263 Filed 4-25-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312-50-S DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service Notice of Intent to Repatriate Cultural Items: American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice. Notice is here given in accordance with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3005, of the intent to repatriate cultural items in the possession of the American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, that meet the definition of “unassociated funerary objects” under 25 U.S.C. 3001. This notice is published as part of the National Park Service(s administrative responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 U.S.C. 3003 (d)(3). The determinations in this notice are the sole responsibility of the museum, institution, or Federal agency that has control of the cultural items. The National Park Service is not responsible for the determinations in this notice. The 31 cultural items are from 2 shamans' kits. The first shaman's kit contains 18 cultural items; the second shaman's kit contains 14 cultural items. At an unknown date, Lieutenant George Thornton Emmons acquired the 31 cultural items. In 1894, the American Museum of Natural History purchased the shamans' kits from Lieutenant Emmons and accessioned them into its collection that same year. The first shaman's kit consists of one box drum, one beating stick, one bundle of beating sticks, three ornamental portions of dance headdresses, one headdress mask, three wooden carvings, one portion of a wooden rattle, three strings of scallop shells, four wooden guards or spirits, and one doctor's urine box. The box drum is made from wood and is painted to represent a brown bear. The beating stick measures about 32 cm x 3 cm x 1 cm. The bundle of beating sticks measures 37 cm x 14 cm x 7 cm and consists of 11 sticks tied together with plant fiber. The first portion of one dance headdress is a wooden figure carved to represent a salmon that is painted graphite and black. The second and third partial headdresses are wooden figures carved to represent bears' heads. The wooden headdress mask is carved to represent a Tlingit spirit (a dead man) and is painted black and red. The first wooden carving depicts a land otter that is sitting up. The second carving depicts a spirit with a frog in its stomach, and the third wooden carving depicts a spirit with a land otter coming out of its mouth. The partial rattle consists of a wooden handle attached to the rattle's body that is carved to represent an oyster-catcher. The three strings of shells consist of scallop shells attached with hide. The first wooden guard or spirit is carved to represent an eagle, and the second is carved to represent a bear. The third wooden guard or spirit is carved to represent a figure with a fighting headdress, and the fourth is carved to represent many spirits. The doctor's urine box is made of wood, stands on two legs, and measures approximately 32 cm x 22 cm x 18 cm. The second shaman's kit consists of one wooden rattle, four wooden masks, two headdress masks, one headdress, one ceremonial hat, two ornamental tops of dance headdresses, and three sections of walrus ivory. The wooden rattle is carved to represent the sun and is ornamentally painted to depict a frog. The first wooden mask is carved to represent a land otter and is ornamentally painted red, black, and mineral blue, with a devil fish painted on each cheek. The second wooden mask is carved to represent a man's face; the center of the forehead is raised and is carved to represent a killer whale's dorsal fin. The mask is ornamentally painted in red, black, and native mineral blue. Tail feathers of a red wing flicker are painted on each cheek, while the forehead is painted to depict a raven. The third wooden mask is carved to represent the spirit of an old man named “Shou-Kee-yake” and is painted red, black, and native mineral blue. The fourth wooden mask is carved to represent an old woman with a labret in the lower lip. The mask is also ornamentally painted red, black, and native mineral blue; and on the face are painted the tail feathers of the red wing flicker. The two headdress masks are made of wood. The first headdress mask, carved to represent an eagle, is painted red, black, and native mineral blue, and is ornamented with copper eyebrows. The second headdress mask is carved to represent a ground hog and is ornamented with copper eyebrows and operculum teeth. Above the forehead, three carved spirit faces are painted red, black, and native mineral blue. The headdress is made of wood and hide and is painted red, black, and native mineral blue. It is carved to represent a kingfisher above and a frog below, with both figures ornamented with copper eyebrows and operculum teeth. The ceremonial hat is made of woven spruce root and is painted to depict a spirit of a man with a devil fish on either hand. The first ornamental portion of the dance headdress consists of four woven spruce root disks, and the second portion consists of five woven spruce root disks. The walrus ivory is in three pieces. The cultural affiliation of the 31 cultural items is Hutsnuwu (“Hootz-ar-tar qwan'') Tlingit as indicated through museum records and consultation with representatives of the Central Council of the Tlingit & Haida Indian Tribes. Museum records identify the items as having come from the grave houses of two doctors of the “Hootz-ar-tar qwan.” The Central Council of the Tlingit &Haida Indian Tribes has requested the shamans' kits on behalf of the clans of Angoon who comprise the Hutsnuwu Tlingit. Officials of the American Museum of Natural History have determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001
(3)(B), the 31 cultural items described above are reasonably believed to have been placed with or near individual human remains at the time of death or later as part of the death rite or ceremony and are believed, by a preponderance of the evidence, to have been removed from a specific burial site of Native American individuals. Officials of the American Museum of Natural History also have determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (2), there is a relationship of shared group identity that can be reasonably traced between the unassociated funerary objects and the Central Council of the Tlingit & Haida Indian Tribes. Representatives of any other Indian tribe that believes itself to be culturally affiliated with the unassociated funerary objects should contact Nell Murphy, Director of Cultural Resources, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, telephone
(212)769-5837, before May 26, 2006. Repatriation of the unassociated funerary objects to the Central Council of the Tlingit & Haida Indian Tribes may proceed after that date if no additional claimants come forward. The American Museum of Natural History is responsible for notifying the Angoon Community Association, Central Council of the Tlingit & Haida Indian Tribes, Kootznoowoo Incorporated, and Sealaska Heritage Institute that this notice has been published. Dated: March 23, 2006. Sherry Hutt, Manager, National NAGPRA Program. [FR Doc. E6-6264 Filed 4-25-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312-50-S DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service Notice of Intent to Repatriate Cultural Items: South Dakota State Historical Society, Archaeological Research Center, Rapid City, SD AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice. Notice is here given in accordance with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3005, of the intent to repatriate cultural items in the possession of the South Dakota State Historical Society, Archaeological Research Center, Rapid City, SD, that meet the definition of “unassociated funerary object” under 25 U.S.C. 3001. This notice is published as part of the National Park Service's administrative responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 U.S.C. 3003 (d)(3). The determinations in this notice are the sole responsibility of the museum, institution, or Federal agency that has control of the cultural items. The National Park Service is not responsible for the determinations in this notice. The 14 cultural items are 2 unmodified freshwater bivalve shells, 1 lot of charred wood fragments, 1 lot of bone beads, 1 lot of flint flakes, 1 shell bead, and 8 shell pendants removed from Gregory and Roberts Counties, SD. A detailed assessment of the cultural items was made by the Archaeological Research Center's professional staff in consultation with representatives of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe of the Cheyenne River Reservation, South Dakota; Crow Creek Sioux Tribe of the Crow Creek Reservation, South Dakota; Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe of South Dakota; Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma; Lower Sioux Indian Community in the State of Minnesota; Northern Cheyenne Tribe of the Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation, Montana; Oglala Sioux Tribe of the Pine Ridge Reservation, South Dakota; Omaha Tribe of Nebraska; Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Indians, Oklahoma; Prairie Island Indian Community in the State of Minnesota; Rosebud Sioux Tribe of the Rosebud Indian Reservation, South Dakota; Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa; Santee Sioux Nation, Nebraska; Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse Reservation, South Dakota; Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation, North Dakota; Upper Sioux Indian Community, Minnesota; and Yankton Sioux Tribe of South Dakota. In 1923, 11 cultural objects were removed from Daugherty Mounds, 39RO10, in Roberts County, SD, by W.H. Over Museum personnel. The 11 cultural items are 1 lot of bone beads, 1 lot of flint flakes, 1 shell bead, and 8 shell pendants, which were found in association with burials. The cultural items were curated at W.H. Over Museum and then transferred to the Archaeological Research Center in 1974. The human remains with which the 11 cultural items were originally associated were reburied in the mound at the close of the excavation in 1923. The Daugherty Mounds date to the Woodland period (A.D. 500 - A.D. 1100). In 1941, three cultural items were removed from the Scalp Creek site, 39GR1, in Gregory County, SD, by E.E. Meleen from the W.H. Over Museum, Vermillion, SD, as part of a Works Projects Administration project. The three cultural items are two unmodified freshwater bivalve shells and one lot of charred wood fragments, which were found in association with burials. The cultural items were curated at W.H. Over Museum and then transferred to the Archaeological Research Center in 1974. The human remains with which the lot of charred wood fragments were originally associated were reburied in the mound at the close of the excavation in 1941. The human remains with which the two unmodified freshwater bivalve shells were originally associated were reburied along the Missouri River near Fort Pierre in 1986. The Scalp Creek site dates to the Late Woodland period (A.D. 800 - A.D. 1200) and the Extended Coalescent Tradition (A.D. 1500 - A.D. 1675). Evaluation of documentation from the excavation of the Daugherty Mounds and Scalp Creek sites indicates that the cultural items were found in association with Native American human remains. Other human remains from the Daugherty Mounds and Scalp Creek sites that remain in the possession and control of the Archaeological Research Center have been identified as Native American based on physical anthropological assessment, manner and location of burial, and types of funerary objects associated with the human remains. The Daugherty Mounds and Scalp Creek sites are located within Sioux aboriginal land as determined by the Indian Claims Commission and shown on the map of Indian Land Areas Judicially Established (1978). The Sioux are represented today by the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe of the Cheyenne River Reservation, South Dakota; Crow Creek Sioux Tribe of the Crow Creek Reservation, South Dakota; Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe of South Dakota; Lower Sioux Indian Community in the State of Minnesota; Oglala Sioux Tribe of the Pine Ridge Reservation, South Dakota; Prairie Island Indian Community in the State of Minnesota; Rosebud Sioux Tribe of the Rosebud Indian Reservation, South Dakota; Santee Sioux Nation, Nebraska; Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse Reservation, South Dakota; Upper Sioux Indian Community, Minnesota; and Yankton Sioux Tribe of South Dakota. Based on historical documents, oral history, and archeological data, the Cheyenne, Iowa, Omaha, Otoe & Missouria, and Sac & Fox people also occupied what is now present-day South Dakota and the surrounding region, and are represented today by the Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma; Northern Cheyenne Tribe of the Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation, Montana; Omaha Tribe of Nebraska; Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Indians, Oklahoma; Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa; and Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation, North Dakota. Officials of the Archaeological Research Center have determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (3)(B), the 14 cultural items described above are reasonably believed to have been placed with or near individual human remains at the time of death or later as part of the death rite or ceremony, and are believed, by a preponderance of the evidence, to have been removed from a specific burial site of Native American individuals. Officials of the Archaeological Research Center also have determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (2), a relationship of shared group identity cannot reasonably be traced between the cultural objects and any present-day Indian tribe. In July 2003, the Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe of South Dakota submitted a request to the Archaeological Research Center for repatriation of the culturally unidentifiable human remains and funerary objects from eastern, central, and northwestern South Dakota, and southeastern Montana, including the 14 unassociated funerary objects from the Daugherty Mounds and Scalp Creek sites, on behalf of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe of the Cheyenne River Reservation, South Dakota; Crow Creek Sioux Tribe of the Crow Creek Reservation, South Dakota; Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe of South Dakota; Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma; Lower Sioux Indian Community in the State of Minnesota; Northern Cheyenne Tribe of the Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation, Montana; Oglala Sioux Tribe of the Pine Ridge Reservation, South Dakota; Omaha Tribe of Nebraska; Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Indians, Oklahoma; Prairie Island Indian Community in the State of Minnesota; Rosebud Sioux Tribe of the Rosebud Indian Reservation, South Dakota; Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa; Santee Sioux Nation, Nebraska; Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse Reservation, South Dakota; Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation, North Dakota; Upper Sioux Indian Community, Minnesota; and Yankton Sioux Tribe of South Dakota. Pursuant to 43 CFR 10.9 (e)(6), museums and Federal agencies must retain possession of culturally unidentifiable human remains pending promulgation of 43 CFR 10.11 unless legally required to do otherwise or recommended to do otherwise by the Secretary of the Interior. The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Review Committee (Review Committee) is responsible for recommending specific actions for disposition of culturally unidentifiable human remains. In November 2005, the Archaeological Research Center requested that the Review Committee recommend disposition of the culturally unidentifiable human remains and associated funerary objects from eastern, central, and northwestern South Dakota, and southeastern Montana to the Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe of South Dakota on behalf of themselves and the Indian tribes listed above that comprise a consortium of 17 Indian tribes. The Review Committee considered the proposal at its November 2005 meeting in Albuquerque, NM, and recommended disposition of the human remains and associated funerary objects to the tribal consortium. A November 23, 2005 letter from the Designated Federal Officer, on behalf of the chair of the Review Committee, to the Archaeological Research Center transmitted the Review Committee's recommendation that the Archaeological Research Center effect disposition of the culturally unidentifiable human remains and associated funerary objects to the tribal consortium contingent on the publication of a Notice of Inventory Completion in the **Federal Register** . Disposition of unassociated funerary objects for which a relationship of shared group identity cannot be reasonably traced to a present-day Indian tribe does not require a recommendation from the Secretary. However, since these unassociated funerary objects were removed from two of the same sites for which human remains were already considered by the Review Committee, the Archaeological Research Center has decided to effect a similar disposition to the Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe of South Dakota on behalf of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe of the Cheyenne River Reservation, South Dakota; Crow Creek Sioux Tribe of the Crow Creek Reservation, South Dakota; the Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe of South Dakota; Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma; Lower Sioux Indian Community in the State of Minnesota; Northern Cheyenne Tribe of the Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation, Montana; Oglala Sioux Tribe of the Pine Ridge Reservation, South Dakota; Omaha Tribe of Nebraska; Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Indians, Oklahoma; Prairie Island Indian Community in the State of Minnesota; Rosebud Sioux Tribe of the Rosebud Indian Reservation, South Dakota; Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa; Santee Sioux Nation, Nebraska; Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse Reservation, South Dakota; Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation, North Dakota; Upper Sioux Indian Community, Minnesota; and Yankton Sioux Tribe of South Dakota. Representatives of any Indian tribe that believes itself to be culturally affiliated with the 14 unassociated funerary objects should contact Renee M. Boen, Repository Manager, Archaeological Research Center, 2425 E. St. Charles St., Rapid City, SD 57703, telephone
(605)394-1936, before May 26, 2006. Disposition of the unassociated funerary objects to the Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe of South Dakota on behalf of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe of the Cheyenne River Reservation, South Dakota; Crow Creek Sioux Tribe of the Crow Creek Reservation, South Dakota; Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma; Lower Sioux Indian Community in the State of Minnesota; Northern Cheyenne Tribe of the Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation, Montana; Oglala Sioux Tribe of the Pine Ridge Reservation, South Dakota; Omaha Tribe of Nebraska; Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Indians, Oklahoma; Prairie Island Indian Community in the State of Minnesota; Rosebud Sioux Tribe of the Rosebud Indian Reservation, South Dakota; Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa; Santee Sioux Nation, Nebraska; Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse Reservation, South Dakota; Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation, North Dakota; Upper Sioux Indian Community, Minnesota; Yankton Sioux Tribe of South Dakota; and themselves, may proceed after that date if no additional claimants come forward. The Archaeological Research Center is responsible for notifying the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe of the Cheyenne River Reservation, South Dakota; Crow Creek Sioux Tribe of the Crow Creek Reservation, South Dakota; Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe of South Dakota; Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma; Lower Sioux Indian Community in the State of Minnesota; Northern Cheyenne Tribe of the Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation, Montana; Oglala Sioux Tribe of the Pine Ridge Reservation, South Dakota; Omaha Tribe of Nebraska; Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Indians, Oklahoma; Prairie Island Indian Community in the State of Minnesota; Rosebud Sioux Tribe of the Rosebud Indian Reservation, South Dakota; Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa; Santee Sioux Nation, Nebraska; Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse Reservation, South Dakota; Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation, North Dakota; Upper Sioux Indian Community, Minnesota; and Yankton Sioux Tribe of South Dakota that this notice has been published. Dated: April 13, 2006. Sherry Hutt, Manager, National NAGPRA Program. [FR Doc. E6-6268 Filed 4-25-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312-50-S DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act AGENCY: In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that a proposed consent decree in *United States* v. *AOL Express, Inc., et al.,* Civil Action No. C06-5204FDB, was lodged on April 13, 2006, with the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. The consent decree requires defendants AOL Express, Inc., Arkema Inc., Edward and Molly Barry, Buffelen Woodworking Co., CHS Inc., Charles P. and Patricia Curran, Dunlap Towing Company, Estate of Norman Nordlund, Estate of Leslie P. Sussman, F.O.F., Inc., Hylebos Boat Haven, Hylebos Marina, Inc., Judy Johnson, Jones Chemicals, Inc., Joseph Simon & Sons/Rail & Locomotive Equipment Co., Louisiana-pacific Corporation, Phyllis Nordlund, Nordlund Boat Company, Inc., Don and Alba Oline, Ronald Oline, Donald S. and Barbara L. Olson, Kay E. Olson, Olson & Curran Barnacle Stopping Salt Water Free Vertical Dry Dock Co. dba Ole & Charlie's Marinas Portac, Inc., Rayonier Properties, LLC, Paula Rose, Sussman Rose Sussman, Alan Sussman, Sophie Sussman, USG Interiors, Inc., Wasser & Winters Co., Inc., West Waterway Associates, P.S. and Zidell Marine Corporation to compensate natural resource trustees for natural resource damages in Commencement Bay, Washington, resulting from releases of hazardous substances. The trustees are the State of Washington, the Puyallup Tribe of Indians, the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration of the United States Department of Commerce, and the United States Department of the Interior. Under the consent decree, defendants will fund the construction of a salmon habitat restoration project in Pierce County, Washington, pay the trustees $150,000 for project oversight, and reimburse a total of $1,793,888.46 in trustee damage assessment costs. The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty
(30)days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530, and should refer to *United States* v. *AOL Express, Inc.,* DOJ Ref. # 90-11-2-1049/6. The proposed consent decree may be examined at the office of theUnited States Attorney, 601 Union Street, Seattle, WA 98101. During the public comment period, the Consent Decree may be examined on the following Department of Justice Web site: *http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/open.html* and at the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611 or by faxing a request to Tonia Fleetwood, fax no.
(202)514-0097, phone confirmation number
(202)514-1547. In requesting a copy please refer to the referenced case and enclose a check in the amount of $33.50 (25 cents per page reproduction costs), payable to the U.S. Treasury. Robert E. Maher, Jr., Ass't Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division. [FR Doc. 06-3938 Filed 4-25-06; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 29
Traces to 29 documents
U.S. Code
- Designation procedure§ 1391
- Special purpose grants§ 5307
- Housing education and organizational support§ 12773
- Eligible activities§ 11383
- Administrative provisions§ 3535
- Congressional findings and declaration of purpose§ 5301
- Remedies for noncompliance with community development requirements§ 5311
- Statement of activities and review§ 5304
- Allocation and distribution of funds§ 5306
- General provisions§ 5302
- Urban development action grants§ 5318
- Guarantee and commitment to guarantee loans for acquisition of property§ 5308
- National housing goal§ 12701
- Definitions§ 11371
- Findings§ 12721
- Program authority§ 12891
- Purpose§ 12901
- Findings and purpose§ 11301
- Definitions§ 4601
- Federal purchase and disposition of oil and gas§ 1353
- Rules and regulations governing operations; limitations on oil or gas leases§ 396d
- Secretary’s determination on Minerals Agreements§ 2103
- Purposes§ 3501
- Inventory for human remains and associated funerary objects§ 3003
- Definitions§ 3001
- Repatriation§ 3005
CFR
statutes-at-large
20 references not yet in our index
- 26 USC 1400E
- Pub. L. 108-7
- 117 Stat. 11
- 42 USC 12899
- 24 CFR 91
- Pub. L. 105-65
- 26 USC 1400
- 24 CFR 24
- 30 CFR 202
- 30 CFR 206
- 30 USC 1923
- Pub. L. 97-451
- 30 CFR 206.176
- 30 CFR 206.173
- 30 CFR 206.173(a)
- 30 CFR 218.54
- 30 CFR 290
- 36 CFR 60
- 43 CFR 10.9
- 43 CFR 10.11
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Amendment to Consolidated Delegation of Authority for the Office of Community Planning and Development
Cite26 USC 1400E
Pub. L.Pub. L. 108-7
Stat.117 Stat. 11
Cites 49 · showing 12Cited by 0 across 0 sources