Rules and Regulations. Notice

19,639 words·~89 min read·/register/2006/04/17/06-3640

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 6960-50-M ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [FRL-8159-2] Science Advisory Board Staff Office Notification of an Upcoming Teleconference of the Science Advisory Board Geographic Information System Screening Tool Review Panel AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The EPA Science Advisory Board

(SAB)Staff Office announces a public teleconference of the SAB Geographic Information System Screening Tool Review Panel. DATES: The public teleconference will be held on May 2, 2006, from 2 p.m. to 5 p.m. (eastern time). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Members of the public who wish to obtain the call-in number and access code for the teleconference may contact Dr. Thomas Armitage, Designated Federal Officer (DFO), by mail at the Science Advisory Board Office (1400F), U.S. EPA, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460; by telephone at

(202)343-9995; or by e-mail at *armitage.thomas@epa.gov.* General information about the SAB may be found on the SAB Web site at *http://www.epa.gov/sab.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: *Background:* Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given that the SAB Geographic Information System Screening Tool Review Panel will hold a public teleconference to discuss its draft advisory report on the EPA Region 6 Geographic Information System Screening Tool. The Panel reviewed the GISST at a public meeting held on December 7-8, 2005 and has prepared a draft advisory report to EPA. Background information on the Panel and the GISST review was provided in **Federal Register** notices published on September 22, 2005 (70 FR 55620-55621) and November 15, 2005 (70 FR 69340-69341). The Panel is holding the teleconference to finalize its draft report before submitting the report to the chartered SAB for review and approval. The Panel(s draft advisory report may be found on the SAB Web site at *http://www.epa.gov/sab.* The teleconference agenda will be posted on the SAB website prior to the teleconference. The Panel will comply with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act

(FACA)and all appropriate SAB procedural policies. *Procedures for Providing Public Input:* Members of the public may submit relevant written or oral information for the SAB Panel to consider during the advisory process. *Oral Statements:* In general, individuals or groups requesting an oral presentation at a public teleconference will be limited to three minutes per speaker with no more than a total of fifteen minutes for all speakers. Interested parties should contact the DFO, contact information provided above, in writing via e-mail seven days before the teleconference in order to be placed on the public speaker list. *Written Statements:* Written statements should be received in the SAB Staff Office at least seven days before the meeting so that the information may be made available to the Panel for their consideration. Written statements should be supplied to the DFO in the following formats: one hard copy with original signature, and one electronic copy via e-mail (acceptable file format: Adobe Acrobat, WordPerfect, Word, or Rich Text files (in IBM-PC/Windows 98/2000/XP format). *Meeting Accommodations:* For information on access or services for people with disabilities, please contact the DFO, contact information provided above. To request accommodation of a disability please contact the DFO, preferably at least ten business days prior to the meeting, to give EPA as much time as possible to process your request. Dated: April 11, 2006. Anthony F. Maciorowski, Associate Director for Science, EPA Science Advisory Board Staff Office. [FR Doc. E6-5687 Filed 4-14-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding Companies The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 *et seq.* ) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below. The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at *www.ffiec.gov/nic/* . Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than May 11, 2005. **A. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston** (Richard Walker, Community Affairs Officer) P.O. Box 55882, Boston, Massachusetts 02106-2204: *1. First Suffield Financial Inc.* , Suffield, Connecticut; to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of The First National Bank of Suffield, Suffield, Connecticut. *2. SEE Trust,* Miami, Florida, and Evan Marbin as trustee; to become a bank holding company by acquiring more than 25 percent of the voting shares of TransAtlantic Bank, Miami, Florida. **B. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta** (Andre Anderson, Vice President) 1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30303: *1. FEB Bancshares, Inc.* , Louisville, Alabama; to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the outstanding shares of Farmers Exchange Bank,Louisville, Alabama. **C. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago** (Patrick M. Wilder, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414: *1. Birmingham Bloomfield Bancshares, Inc.* , Birmingham, Michigan; to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Bank of Birmingham (in organization), Birmingham, Michigan. **D. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis** (Glenda Wilson, Community Affairs Officer) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034: *1. First Horizon National Corporation* , Memphis, Tennessee; to acquire 100 percent of The State Bank, Rocky Ford, Colorado. **E. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City** (Donna J. Ward, Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001: *1. Citizens National Corporation* , Wisner, Nebraska; to acquire 40 percent of the voting shares of Republic Corporation, and thereby indirectly acquire shares of United Republic Bank (in organization), both in Omaha, Nebraska. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 11, 2006. Robert deV. Frierson, Deputy Secretary of the Board. [FR Doc. E6-5600 Filed 4-14-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6210-01-S FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding Companies The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 *et seq.* ) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below. The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center Web site at *http://www.ffiec.gov/nic/* . Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than May 12, 2006. **A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland** (Cindy West, Manager) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566: *1. Citizens National Corporation* , Paintsville, Kentucky; to acquire 100 percent of Heritage Bank of Ashland, Inc., Ashland, Kentucky **B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago** (Patrick M. Wilder, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414: *1. Monarch Community Bancorp, Inc.* , Coldwater, Michigan; to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Monarch Community Bank, Coldwater, Michigan. **C. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City** (Donna J. Ward, Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001: *1. The Farmers State Bank of Fort Morgan Colorado Employee Stock Ownership Plan* , Morgan, Colorado; to acquire up to 38 percent of the voting shares of FSB Bancorporation of Fort Morgan, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Farmers State Bank of Fort Morgan, both of Fort Morgan, Colorado. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 12, 2006. Robert deV. Frierson, Deputy Secretary of the Board. [FR Doc. E6-5665 Filed 4-14-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6210-01-S FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible Nonbanking Activities The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage *de novo* , or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States. Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at *www.ffiec.gov/nic/* . Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than May 1, 2006. **A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago** (Patrick M. Wilder, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414: *1. Farmers Bancorp,* , Frankfort, Indiana; to retain 100 percent of the voting shares of Farmers Bank Reinsurance Company, Ltd., Frankfort, Indiana, and thereby engage in the sale or brokering of insurance, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(11)(i) of Regulation Y. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 11, 2006. Robert deV. Frierson, Deputy Secretary of the Board. [FR Doc.E6-5599 Filed 4-14-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6210-01-S FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION [Docket No. 9317] Dynamic Health of Florida, LLC; Analysis of Proposed Consent Order to Aid Public Comment AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission. ACTION: Proposed consent agreement. SUMMARY: The consent agreement in this matter settles alleged violations of federal law prohibiting unfair or deceptive acts or practices or unfair methods of competition. The attached Analysis to Aid Public Comment describes both the allegations in the complaint and the terms of the consent order—embodied in the consent agreement—that would settle these allegations. DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 5, 2006. ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments. Comments should refer to “Dynamic Health of Florida, Docket No. 9317,” to facilitate the organization of comments. A comment filed in paper form should include this reference both in the text and on the envelope, and should be mailed or delivered to the following address: Federal Trade Commission/Office of the Secretary, Room 135-H, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580. Comments containing confidential material must be filed in paper form, must be clearly labeled “Confidential,” and must comply with Commission Rule 4.9(c). 16 CFR 4.9(c) (2005). 1 The FTC is requesting that any comment filed in paper form be sent by courier or overnight service, if possible, because U.S. postal mail in the Washington area and at the Commission is subject to delay due to heightened security precautions. Comments that do not contain any nonpublic information may instead be filed in electronic form as part of or as an attachment to e-mail messages directed to the following e-mail box: *consentagreement@ftc.gov.* 1 The comment must be accompanied by an explicit request for confidential treatment, including the factual and legal basis for the request, and must identify the specific portions of the comment to be withheld from the public record. The request will be granted or denied by the Commission's General Counsel, consistent with applicable law and the public interest. *See* Commission Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c). The FTC Act and other laws the Commission administers permit the collection of public comments to consider and use in this proceeding as appropriate. All timely and responsive public comments, whether filed in paper or electronic form, will be considered by the Commission, and will be available to the public on the FTC website, to the extent practicable, at *http://www.ftc.gov* . As a matter of discretion, the FTC makes every effort to remove home contact information for individuals from the public comments it receives before placing those comments on the FTC website. More information, including routine uses permitted by the Privacy Act, may be found in the FTC's privacy policy, at *http://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm* . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janet Evans (202-326-2125) or Sydney Knight (202-326-2162), Bureau of Consumer Protection, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 6(f) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 38 Stat. 721, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and § 3.25(f) of the Commission Rules of Practice, 16 CFR 3.25(f), notice is hereby given that the above-captioned consent agreement containing a consent order to cease and desist, having been filed with and accepted, subject to final approval, by the Commission, has been placed on the public record for a period of thirty

(30)days. The following Analysis to Aid Public Comment describes the terms of the consent agreement, and the allegations in the complaint. An electronic copy of the full text of the consent agreement package can be obtained from the FTC Home Page (for April 6, 2006), on the World Wide Web, at *http://www.ftc.gov/os/2006/04/index.htm* . A paper copy can be obtained from the FTC Public Reference Room, Room 130-H, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580, either in person or by calling

(202)326-2222. Public comments are invited, and may be filed with the Commission in either paper or electronic form. All comments should be filed as prescribed in the ADDRESSES section above, and must be received on or before the date specified in the DATES section. Analysis of Agreement Containing Consent Order to Aid Public Comment The Federal Trade Commission has accepted, subject to final approval, an agreement containing a consent order with Dynamic Health of Florida, LLC; Chhabra Group, LLC; and Vineet Chhabra a/k/a Vincent Chhabra (“respondents”). The proposed order resolves the allegations of the complaint issued against these respondents and others on June 15, 2004. In the Matter of Dynamic Health of Florida, LLC, D. 9317 (June 15, 2004). The proposed consent order has been placed on the public record for thirty

(30)days for submission of comments by interested persons. Comments received during this period will become part of the public record. After thirty

(30)days, the Commission will review the agreement in light of any comments received and will decide whether it should withdraw from the agreement and take other appropriate action or make final the agreement's proposed order. This matter concerns the respondents' marketing of a purported children's weight loss product called “Pedia Loss” and a purported female libido enhancer called “Fabulously Feminine.” The Commission's complaint charged that advertising for Pedia Loss made unsubstantiated claims that

(1)Pedia Loss causes weight loss in overweight or obese children ages 6 and over, and

(2)when taken by overweight or obese children ages 6 and over, Pedia Loss causes weight loss by suppressing appetite, increasing fat burning, and slowing carbohydrate absorption. The Commission's complaint also charged that advertising for Fabulously Feminine falsely represented that clinical testing proves that Fabulously Feminine enhances a woman's satisfaction with her sex life and level of sexual desire. In addition, the complaint challenged the unsubstantiated claim that Fabulously Feminine will increase a woman's libido, sexual desire, and sexual satisfaction by stimulating blood flow and increasing sensitivity. Part I.A. of the proposed order requires that respondents possess and rely on competent and reliable scientific evidence to support representations that Pedia Loss or any other covered product causes weight loss, suppresses appetite, increases fat burning, or slows carbohydrate absorption; causes weight loss in overweight or obese children ages 6 and over; or causes weight loss by suppressing appetite, increasing fat burning, or slowing carbohydrate absorption, when taken by overweight or obese children ages 6 and over. “Covered product” is defined as any dietary supplement, food, or drug. Part I.B. of the order requires that proposed respondents possess and rely on competent and reliable scientific evidence to support representations that Fabulously Feminine or any other covered product will increase a woman's libido, sexual desire, or sexual satisfaction. Part II of the proposed order requires that respondents possess and rely on competent and reliable scientific evidence to support benefits, performance, or efficacy representations for any covered product. Part III of the proposed order prohibits respondents from misrepresenting the existence, contents, validity, results, conclusions, or interpretations of any test or studies. Part IV of the proposed order permits respondents to make certain claims for food or drugs that are permitted in labeling under laws and/or regulations administered by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The remainder of the proposed order contains requirements that respondents maintain copies of advertising making representations covered by the order and any materials relied upon in disseminating these representations (Part V); distribute copies of the order to certain company officials (Part VI); notify the Commission of changes in corporate structure (Part VII); notify the Commission of changes in the individual respondent's business or employment (Part VIII); and file one or more reports detailing their compliance with the order (Part IX). Part X of the proposed order is a provision whereby the order, absent certain circumstances, terminates twenty years from the date of issuance. The purpose of this analysis is to facilitate public comment on the proposed order, and is not intended to constitute an official interpretation of the agreement and proposed order or to modify in any way their terms. By direction of the Commission. Donald S. Clark, Secretary. [FR Doc. E6-5622 Filed 4-14-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6750-01-P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Indian Health Service Office of Clinical and Preventive Services; Elder Care Initiative Long Term Care Grant Program *Announcement Type:* New Discretionary . *Funding Announcement Number:* HHS-2006-IHS-IWHD-0001. *Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number:* 93.933. Key Dates: *Letter of Intent Deadline:* May 12, 2006. *Application Receipt Deadline:* June 5, 2006. *Application Review Dates:* June 19-30, 2006. *Application Notification:* July 10-14, 2006. *Anticipated Award Start Date:* August 1, 2006. I. Funding Opportunity Description The Indian Health Service

(IHS)announces competitive grant applications for the Elder Care Initiative Long Term Care Grant Program (ECILTC). This program is authorized under section 301(a), Public Health Service Act, as amended, Snyder Act, 42 Stat. 208; Public Law 94-482; and Indian Health Care Improvement Act, 25 U.S.C. 1653(c). This program is described at 93.933 in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance. Approximately $650,000 will be available through the ECILTC grant program to support planning and implementation of sustainable long term care

(LTC)services for American Indians and Alaska Native (AI/AN) elders. The AI/AN elder population is growing rapidly and the AI/AN population as a whole is aging. The prevalence of chronic disease in this population continues to increase, contributing to a frail elder population with increasing long-term care needs. LTC is best understood as an array of social and health care services that support an individual who has needs for assistance in activities of daily living over a prolonged period. LTC supports elders and their families with medical, personal, and social services delivered in a variety of settings to support quality of life, maximum function, and dignity. While families continue to be the backbone of LTC for AI/AN elders, there is well documented need to support this care with formal services. The way these services and systems of care are developed and implemented can have a profound impact on the cultural and spiritual health of the community. Home and community-based services

(HCBS)have the potential for meeting the needs of the vast majority of elders requiring LTC services, supporting the key roles of the family in the care of the elder and the elder in the care of the family and community. A LTC system with a foundation in home and community-based services will also comply with the U.S. Supreme Court interpretation of the Americans with Disabilities Act

(ADA)in *Olmstead* v. *L.C.* This ruling obligates States and localities to provide care for persons with disability “in the most integrated setting appropriate to the needs of qualified individuals with disabilities.” (28 CFR 35.130(d)). An efficient and effective LTC system would make use of all available resources, integrating and coordinating services to assist families in the care of their elders. The primary focus for planning and program development for AI/AN LTC is at the Tribal and urban community level. Tribes and communities have very different histories, capabilities, and resources with regard to LTC program development. Each Tribe or community will have different priorities in building LTC infrastructure. The development of LTC services should be well grounded in an assessment of need based on population demographics and rates of functional impairment. LTC services should be acceptable to elders and their families and consistent with community values in their implementation. The services should be a part of an overall vision and plan for an LTC system to support elders and their families. There are a number of elements (Tribal sovereignty and the government-to-government relationship, the unique funding structure of Indian health, and the importance of the cultural context) that distinguish AI/AN LTC. Tribes and AI/AN organizations have found it useful to look both inside and outside of the Indian health system for LTC strategies and models. The planning and design of LTC services must identify the revenue source(s) that will support the delivery of care. Finding resources for LTC services presents a formidable challenge. Funds appropriated through the IHS (whether direct service or Tribal) can provide services which are part of a LTC system, but do not provide for a comprehensive set of LTC services. Further, IHS funds are intended for health and medical care and cannot support programs which are primarily custodial in nature (e.g. assisted living, board and care) or those designed to serve non-IHS beneficiaries. Programs funded through the Administration on Aging American Indian, Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian Program (e.g. Title VI A and Title VI C Family Caregiver Support Program) have been key elements in the LTC infrastructure in AI/AN communities. Additional Older American Act resources may be available through State Units on Aging and Area Agencies on Aging. Other resources are available to provide LTC services on a reimbursable basis for eligible AI/AN elders. The majority of formal LTC services in this country are funded by reimbursements from state Medicaid and Home and community-based services programs. The Veterans Administration may be a source of reimbursement for LTC services for eligible AI/AN veterans. Federal housing programs are a potential resource in developing the housing component of the LTC infrastructure. Each of these resources has unique eligibility requirements. Development of reimbursement-based LTC services often requires an ongoing investment of funds to support delivery of services during the initial period of client recruitment, start-up of services, and the receipt of reimbursement for those services. This grant program is designed to provide support for the development of AI/AN LTC, with funding for either assessment/planning or program implementation. LTC services developed with support of this grant program must be those which the IHS has the authority to provide, either directly or through funding agreement, and must be designed to serve IHS beneficiaries. Most Tribes and urban communities are building toward their ideal LTC system incrementally, adding new or integrating existing services over time. The goal of this grant program is to support Tribes, Tribal consortia, and urban Indian health programs as they build LTC systems and services that meet the needs of their elders and that keep elders engaged and involved in the lives of their families and communities. II. Award Information *Type of Awards:* Grant. *Estimated Funds Available:* The total amount identified for fiscal year

(FY)2006 is $650,000. The awards are for 24 months, with a one year non-competitive continuation for the second year funding. The continuation awards under this announcement are subject to a satisfactory performance and availability of funds. *Anticipated Number of Awards:* An estimated of 9-12 awards. *Project Period:* 24 months. *Award Amount:* $50,000 per year (Project Type Category I1—Assessment and Planning). $75,000 per year (Project Type Category II2—Implementation). The Long Term Care Grant Program consists of two Project Types Project Types with different funding Levels: 1. Project Type Category I—Assessment and Planning (up to $50,000 per year for 2 years) Assessment of need for LTC services and of the type and structure of services that will best serve the elders of the Tribe or community. The development of a comprehensive plan or vision to meet the LTC needs of the Tribe or community and of a plan for implementation of one or more specific services, including detailed planning for sustainability. At the end of the funding cycle the applicant should be well prepared for successful implementation of one or more sustainable LTC services. The end result of this project should prepare the applicant for a Category II grant application (see below). 2. Project Type Category II—Implementation (up to $75,000 per year for 2 years), including: Implementation of a service or group of services adding capacity to the LTC system of the applicant Tribe or organization. The implementation plan should be based on a comprehensive assessment and plan, including a business plan. The services should be designed to be self-sustaining at the end of the project period. The application must contain only one Project Type. Applications that address more than one Project Type will be ineligible for review and will be returned to the applicant. The maximum funding level includes both direct and indirect costs. Applications with budgets exceeding the maximum funding level or project period identified for a Project Type will not be reviewed. Year 2 continuation awards within the project period will be based on completion of a non-competing continuation application demonstrating on satisfactory performance and on availability of funding, and a non-competing continuation application must show satisfactory performance in order to receive future funding needs of the IHS. III. Eligibility Information 1. Eligible Applicants The AI/AN applicant must be one of the following: A. A Federally-recognized Indian Tribe; or B. Tribal Organization as defined by 25 U.S.C. 1603(e); or C. Urban Indian Organizations as defined by 25 U.S.C. 1603(h). Applicants must provide proof of non-profit status with the application. 2. Cost Sharing or Matching The IHS Office of Clinical and Preventive Services does not require matching funds or cost sharing. 3. Other Requirements The following documentation is required (if applicable): A. Tribal Resolution—A resolution of the Indian Tribe served by the project must accompany the application submission. An Indian Tribe that is proposing a project affecting another Indian Tribe must include resolutions from all affected Tribes to be served. Applications by Tribal organizations will not require a specific Tribal resolution if the current Tribal resolution(s) under which they operate would encompass the proposed grant activities. Draft resolutions are acceptable in lieu of an official resolution. However, an official signed Tribal resolution or additional documentation must be received by the Division of Grants Operations prior to the beginning of the application review date, June 19, 2006. If an official signed resolution is not received by June 19, the application will be considered incomplete, ineligible for review, and it will be returned to the applicant without consideration. Ensure that all information is received by the IHS by obtaining confirmation of delivery (i.e., FedEx tracking, postal return receipt, etc.). B. Documentation of Consortium Participation—If an Indian Tribe submitting an application is a member of a consortium that is also submitting an application under this announcement, the Tribe must: 1. Identify the Consortium. 2. Indicate that the Consortium intends to submit a LTC Grant Program application. 3. Demonstrate that the Tribe's application does not duplicate or overlap any objectives of the consortium's application. If a Consortium is submitting an application it must: 1. Identify all of the consortium member Tribes. 2. Identify if any of the member Tribes intend to submit a LTC Grant application of their own. 3. Demonstrate that the consortium's application does not duplicate or overlap any objectives of the other consortium members who may be submitting their own LTC Grant Program application. Applications received from a Consortium and member Tribe(s) of that Consortium that do not meet the requirements above will be considered ineligible for review. Tribes, Tribal Consortia, and AI/AN programs receiving funding to develop LTC service(s) through the IHS Elder Health Care Initiative Grants program (FY2003-2005) must show substantial completion of the currently funded project(s). The goals and objectives of this application must be different than those of the currently funded project (e.g., an applicant with current funding to implement an Adult Day Health Program now applies for funding to implement a personal care program). Please refer to Sections IV 56. “Funding Restrictions” and V 3. “Review Section Process” for more information regarding other application submission information and/or requirements. C. The Letter of Intent

(LOI)is required for eligibility. The LOI will be used only as a responsiveness criterion and will not be reviewed. IV. Application and Submission Information 1. Address to Request Application Package Applicant package may be found in Grants.gov or at: *http://www.ihs.gov/MedicalPrograms/ElderCare/index.asp.* 2. Content and Form of Application Submission A LOI to apply is required and must be postmarked no later than May 12, 2006. No grant application will be reviewed unless a LOI has been received. The LOI must contain: A. The name of the applying organization. B. The individual who is responsible for correspondence regarding the application, and contact information. Please indicate whether fax or e-mail notification of receipt of LOI is preferred, and provide e-mail address and/or fax number. C. The name of all member Tribes if the applicant is a Tribal Consortium. D. Whether the intent is to apply for a Project Type Category I or Project Type Category II grant. E. Applicants will be notified by fax or e-mail that their LOI has been received upon receipt. F. A LOI is a mandatory but non-binding request for information that will assist in planning both the review and post award phase. There is no penalty for submitting a LOI and not proceeding with the grant application. G. Information regarding the LOI to Ms. Platero and may be directed to: *Program Contact:* Ms. Orie Platero, Office of Clinical and Preventive Services (OCPS), Indian Health Service, 801 Thompson Ave., TMP Suite 326, Rockville, MD 20852, Phone

(301)443-2522, Fax:

(301)594-6213. *Grants Contact:* Ms. Martha Redhouse, Grants Management Specialist, Indian Health Service, 801 Thompson Ave., TMP Suite 360, Rockville, MD 20852, Phone

(301)443-5204, Fax:

(301)443-9602. H. Information regarding the electronic process may be directed to Michelle G. Bulls, at

(301)443-6528. Content and Form of Application Submission if paper submission approval was obtained: A. Be single spaced. B. Be typewritten. C. Have consecutively numbered pages. D. If unable to submit electronically, submit using a black type not smaller than 12 characters per one inch.

(1)Submit on one side only of standard size 8 1/2 ″ x 11″ paper.

(2)Do not tab, glue, or place in a plastic holder. Use black type not smaller than 12 characters per one inch. E. Contain a narrative that does not exceed 7 typed pages that includes the other submission requirements below. The 7 page narrative does not include the work plan, standard forms, Tribal resolutions (if necessary), table of contents, budget line items, budget justifications, narratives, and/or other appendix items. Public Policy Requirements: All Federal-wide public policies apply to IHS grants with the exception of Lobbying and Discrimination. If paper submission approval was obtained, include in the application the following documents in the order presented: A. Letter of Intent must be received by May 12, 2006. B. Application Receipt Record, IHS-815-1A (Rev. 3/05), if applicable. C. FY 2006 Elder Care Initiative LTC Grant Application Checklist. D. FY 2006 General Information Page. E. Tribal Resolution (final signed or draft unsigned) or 501(c)(3) Certification. F. Documentation of Consortium Participation (if applicable). G. Standard Form 424, Application for Federal Assistance. H. Standard Form 424A, Budget Information—Non-Construction Programs. I. Standard Form 424B, Assurances—Non-Construction Programs (front and back). The application shall contain assurances to the Secretary that the applicant will comply with program regulations, 42 CFR Part 36 Subpart H. J. Certifications. K. PHS-5161 Checklist. L. Disclosure of Lobbying Activities. M. Project Abstract (may not exceed one typewritten page) which should present a summary view of “who-what-when-where-how-cost” to determine acceptability for review. N. Table of Contents with corresponding numbered pages. O. Project Narrative (not to exceed 7-14 typewritten pages—should address first year only if project is a multi-year request) that includes the following:

(1)Introduction and Need for Assistance.

(2)Work Plan.

(3)Project Evaluation.

(4)Organizational Capabilities and Qualifications.

(5)Categorical Budget line items and Budget Justification. P. Multi-year Objectives and Work plan with Multi-year Categorical Budget and Multi-year. Q. Appendix items. Public Policy Requirements: All Federal-wide public policies apply to IHS grants with the exception of Lobbying and Discrimination. 3. Submission Dates and Times Applications must be submitted electronically through Grants.gov by close of business Monday, June 5, 5 p.m. ET. If technical issues arise and the applicant is unable to successfully complete the electronic application process, the applicant must contact Michelle G. Bulls, Grants Policy Staff at

(301)443-6528 fifteen days prior to the application deadline and advise them of the difficulties you are having submitting your application on line. The Grants Policy staff will determine whether you may submit a paper application (original and 2 copies). Please note, the grantee must obtain prior approval, in writing, from the Grants Policy staff allowing the paper submission. Applications not submitted through Grants.gov, without the necessary waiver, may be returned to the applicant without review or consideration. Late applications will be returned to the applicant without review or consideration. A hard copy or faxed LOI must be received on or before Friday, May 12, 2006. This should be no more than 2 pages. 4. Intergovernmental Review Executive Order 12372 requiring intergovernmental review is not applicable to this program. 5. Funding Restrictions A. Pre-award costs are not allowable pending prior approval from the awarding agency. However, in accordance with 45 CFR part 74 all pre-award costs are incurred at the recipient's risk. The awarding office is under no obligation to reimburse such costs if for any reason the applicant does not receive an award or if the award to the recipient is less than anticipated. B. The available funds are inclusive of direct and indirect costs. C. Only one grant/cooperative agreement will be awarded per applicant. D. Ineligible project activities: These funds may not be used to support already existing recurring operational programs or to replace existing public and private resources. The inclusion of the following projects or activities in an application will render the application ineligible and the application will be returned to the applicant:

(1)Projects related to water, sanitation, and waste management.

(2)Projects that seek funding in two Project Types funding categories. E. An otherwise eligible applicant who is a current recipient of IHS Elder Health Care Initiative grant funding (FY2003-2005) cannot be awarded a new, renewal or competing continuation grant for any of the following reasons:

(1)The current project is not progressing in a satisfactory manner.

(2)The current project is not in compliance with program and financial reporting requirements.

(3)There is overlap between the specific work plan and objectives outlined in the application with those in the currently funded project.

(4)If the funding period of the new award overlaps with current support, the grantee must relinquish or reduce funding on the current award. For additional information or clarification, please contact Ms. Michelle Bulls, Grants Policy Officer at

(301)443-6528. F. Delinquent Federal Debts. No award shall be made to an applicant who has an outstanding delinquent Federal debt until either:

(1)The delinquent account is paid in full; or

(2)A negotiated repayment schedule is established and at least one payment is received. 6. Other Submission Requirements Electronic Transmission—The preferred method for receipt of applications is electronic submission through Grants.gov. However, should any technical problems arise regarding the submission, please contact Grants.gov Customer Support at

(800)518-4726 or *support@grants.gov* . The Contact Center hours of operation are Monday-Friday from 7 a.m. to 9 p.m. (Eastern Standard Time). If you require additional assistance please contact IHS Grants Policy staff at

(301)443-6528 at least fifteen days prior to the application deadline. To submit an application electronically, please use the *http://www.Grants.gov* Web site. Download a copy of the application package on the Grants.gov website, complete it off-line and then upload and submit the application via the Grants.gov Web site. You may not e-mail an electronic copy of a grant application. Please note the following: A. Under the new IHS requirements, paper applications are not the preferred method. However, if you have technical problems submitting your application on-line, please contact Grants.gov Customer Support at: *http://www.grants.gov/CustomerSupport* . If you are still unable to successfully submit your application online, please contact Grants Policy staff fifteen days prior to the application deadline and advise them of the difficulties you are having submitting your application online. At that time, it will be determined whether you may submit a paper application. At that point you have to download the application package from Grants.gov, and send it directly to the Division of Grants Operations, 801 Thompson Avenue, TMP 360, Rockville, MD 20852 by the June 5, 2006 due date. B. When you enter the Grants.gov Web site, you will find information about submitting an application electronically through the Web site, as well as the hours of operation. We strongly recommend that applicants not wait until the deadline date to begin the application process through the Grants.gov Web site. C. To use Grants.gov, you, as the applicant, must have a DUNS number and register with the Central Contractor Registry (CCR). You should allow a minimum of five days to complete CCR registration. See below on how to apply. D. You must submit all documents electronically, including all information typically included on the SF-424 and all necessary assurances and certifications. E. Your application must comply with any page limitation requirements described in the program announcement. F. After you electronically submit your application, you will receive an automatic acknowledgment from Grants.gov that contains a Grants.gov tracking number. The IHS DGO will retrieve your application from Grants.gov Web site. G. You may access the electronic application for this program on *http://www.Grants.gov* . H. You must search for the downloadable application package by using the basic search engine in Grants.gov and inserting the CFDA number, 93.933 that is used for this announcement. E-mail applications will not be accepted under this announcement. The required Letter of Intent

(LOI)must be faxed or postmarked on or before May 12, 2006 to: Ms. Orie Platero, Office of Clinical and Preventive Services (OCPS), Indian Health Service, 801 Thompson Ave., TMP Suite 326, Rockville, MD 20852. Fax

(301)594-6213. DUNS Number Applicants are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet

(DUNS)number to apply for a grant or cooperative agreement from the Federal Government. The DUNS number is a nine-digit identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities. Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a DUNS number, access *http://www.dunandbradstreet.com* or call

(866)705-5711. Interested parties may wish to obtain their DUNS number by phone to expedite the process. Applications submitted electronically must also be registered with the Central Contractor Registry (CCR). A DUNS number is required before CCR registration can be completed. Many organizations may already have a DUNS number. Please use the number listed above to investigate whether or not your organization has a DUNS number. Registration with the CCR is free of charge. Applicants may register by calling

(888)227-2423. Please review and complete the CCR “Registration Worksheet” located on *http://www.grants.gov/CCRRegister* . More detailed information regarding these registration processes can be found at *http://www.grants.gov* . V. Application Review Information Note: Only those programs or services which the IHS is authorized to provide, either directly or through funding agreement, can be supported by this grant program. Specifically, those services which are primarily housing or custodial in nature are not eligible for support ( *e.g.* assisted living facility, board and care, or nursing home which is primarily custodial in nature). Supportive services delivered in those facilities, with the intent to promote the health and wellness of elders, are eligible for funding. Programs and services developed with support of this grant program must be designed for the benefit of IHS beneficiaries. 1. Criteria The instructions for preparing the application narrative also constitute the evaluation criteria for reviewing and scoring the application. Weights assigned to each section are noted in parentheses. The narrative should include only the first year of activities; information for multi-year projects should be included as an appendix (see “Multi-year Project Requirements” at the end of this section for more information). The narrative section should be written in a manner that is clear to outside reviewers unfamiliar with prior related activities of the applicant. It should be well organized, succinct, and contain all information necessary for reviewers to understand the project fully. A. Project Type Category I—Assessment and Planning Criteria. Introduction and Need for Assistance (30 points). Provide an understanding of the LTC needs of the elderly in the Tribe or service area and identify the additional information needed for planning. The applicant should use the best data available, understanding that, for most programs, many of these data elements will not be available or be poor in quality and that improved data for future planning will be an outcome of this grant-funded project. Data that is not available should be noted as such and addressed in the B. Work Plan (below). Identify all information sources.

(1)Currently available information for use in planning and service development: a. Currently available information regarding population and need for services; i. Demographics of the population and assessment of LTC needs on a population basis; ii. Geographic and social factors, including availability of caregivers; iii. Cultural and religious values regarding care of the elder for the population(s) to be served, and; iv. Elder preferences for type, structure, and setting of services. b. Currently available information regarding existing services and resources for long term care: i. Availability and organization of existing aging and LTC services, including services available to Tribal or community members provided by non-Tribal/non-AI/AN organization programs; ii. Availability and organization of health services for the elderly, including Native healing systems; iii. Assessment of the capacity of available LTC services to support care provided “in the most integrated setting appropriate to the needs of qualified individuals with disabilities” (Olmstead vs. L.C), and; iv. Assessment of caregiver workforce. c. Funding streams currently paying for LTC services. d. Current collaborations in program development or service delivery.

(2)Current vision for LTC system/services and priorities for development.

(3)Elder care assessment and planning activities within the past 10 years. a. Funding sources. b. Dates of funding. c. Summary of project accomplishments. d. How do they relate to the current proposal? *Copies of reports will not be accepted.*

(4)Unmet need for LTC services.

(5)Identify the information needed for planning and service implementation which is not currently available.

(6)Summarize relevant national, IHS, or state standards, laws and regulations and Tribal codes. B. Work Plan (40 points) This section should demonstrate the soundness and effectiveness of the applicant's proposal. The work plan should be designed to produce as an end product the readiness to develop LTC service(s) and should include all information not already available. The following is an, for example of information to be developed through the workplan: • Demographic assessment of the population and assessment of LTC needs on a population basis. ➢ Population distribution. Number of elderly of different age and gender groups in the population. ➢ Rates of functional impairment and numbers of elders with need for assistance in activities of daily living in adequate detail to project need for services. • Assessment of relevant geographic and social factors, including availability of caregivers. • Assessment of cultural and religious values regarding care of the elder for the population(s) to be served. • Assessment of elder preferences for type, structure, and setting of services. • Evaluation of existing services and resources for LTC, including: ➢ Availability and organization of existing aging and LTC services, including those services available to Tribal or community members provided by organizations or programs that are not Tribal or AI/AN organizations. ➢ Availability and organization of health services for the elderly, including Native healing systems. ➢ Capacity of existing LTC services to support care provided “in the most integrated setting appropriate to the needs of qualified individuals with disabilities” (Olmstead vs. L.C). • Assessment of caregiver workforce needs, including: ➢ Availability of potential caregivers (formal and informal). ➢ Training needs for formal and informal caregivers. ➢ Identification of potential funding sources for LTC services. ➢ Program development. ➢ Cost of ongoing service delivery. ➢ Identification of potential partners. ➢ Development of a comprehensive vision for LTC system/services based on the information above, with priorities for implementation and relevant feasibility/business plans. (For an example of the information needed to demonstrates readiness to develop LTC service(s), see A INTRODUCTION AND NEED FOR ASSISTANCE in the Project TypeCategory II Implementation criteria). Note that attendance and presentation at the annual AI/AN LTC Conference is a requirement of the grant and should be included as an activity in the work plan.

(1)State the proposed assessment or planning process.

(2)List the objectives clearly. a. Identify the data elements needed. b. Indicate the function of each data element in the plan.

(3)Describe the approach to the project. a. Tasks. b. Resources needed to implement and complete the project. c. Timeline. d. Specialized technical resources for data collection or analysis. e. Training needs.

(4)Include in work plan attendance and presentation at the annual AI/AN LTC Conference.

(5)Identify the final product of the assessment/plan and the strategy for dissemination.

(6)Submit a work plan in the appendix which includes the following information: a. Action steps on a time line for implementation of the work plan. b. Identify who will perform the action steps. c. Identify who will supervise the action steps. d. Identify who will accept and/or approve work products at the end of the proposed project. e. Include any additional training that will take place during the proposed project, who will conduct the training and who will be attending the training. f. If consultants or contractors will be used during the proposed project, please include the following information in their position description and scope of work (or note if consultants/contractors will not be used): i. Educational requirements. ii. Desired qualifications and work experience. iii. Expected work products. iv. Contractor's supervisor. v. Resume and letter of commitment in the appendix if a potential consultant/contractor has already been identified. C. Project Evaluation (10 points). This Section should show how progress on this project will be accessed and how the success of this project will be judged.

(1)Specifically list and describe the outcomes by which this project will be evaluated.

(2)Identify the evaluator and/or the individual with responsibility for the evaluation (need not be an outside evaluator).

(3)Each proposed project objective and task of the work plan should be able to be evaluated and the evaluation activities should appear on the work plan. D. Organizational Capabilities And Qualifications (10 points). This section outlines the broader capacity of the Tribe, Tribal organization, or Urban health program to complete the project outlined in the work plan. It includes the identification of personnel responsible for completing tasks and chain of responsibility for successful completion of the project outlined in the work plan.

(1)Describe the organizational structure of the Tribe/Tribal organization beyond health care activities.

(2)If management systems are already in place, simply note it. (A copy of the 25 CFR part 900, subpart F, is available in the ECILTC application package.)

(3)Describe the ability of the organization to manage the proposed project. Include information regarding similarly sized projects in scope and financial assistance as well as other grants and projects successfully completed.

(4)Describe what equipment ( *i.e.* , fax machine, phone, computer, etc.) and facility space ( *i.e.* , office space) will be available for use during the proposed project. Include information about any equipment not currently available that will be purchased through the grant.

(5)List key personnel who will work on the project. a. Identify existing personnel and new program staff to be hired. b. In the appendix, include position descriptions and resumes for all key personnel. Position descriptions should clearly describe each position and duties, indicating desired qualifications experience, requirements related to the proposed project and how they will be supervised. Resumes must indicate that the proposed staff member is qualified to carry out the proposed project activities and who will determine if the work of a contractor is acceptable. c. Note who will be writing the progress report. d. If a position is to be filled, indicate that information on the proposed position description. e. If the project requires additional personnel beyond those covered by the grant funds, ( *i.e.* , IT support, volunteers, interviewers, etc.), note these and address how these positions will be filled and, if funds are required, the source of these funds. f. If personnel are to be only partially funded by this grant, indicate the percentage of time to be allocated to this project and identify the resources used to fund the remainder of the individual's salary. E. Categorical Budget and Budget Justification (10 points). This section should provide a clear estimate of the project program costs and justification for expenses for the entire grant period. The budget and budget justification should be consistent with the tasks identified in the work plan.

(1)Categorical budget (Form SF 424A, Budget Information Non-Construction Programs) completing each of the budget periods requested.

(2)Narrative justification for all costs, explaining why each line item is necessary or relevant to the proposed project. Include sufficient details to facilitate the determination of cost allowability.

(3)Indication of any special start-up costs.

(4)Budget justification should include a brief program narrative for the second year.

(5)If indirect costs are claimed, indicate and apply the current negotiated rate to the budget. Include a copy of the rate agreement in the appendix. Project Type Category II Program Implementation Criteria A. Introduction and Need for Assistance (35 points). Provide an understanding of current need for and availability of long term care services for the elderly in the Tribe or service area. Demonstrate the necessary assessment and planning to successfully implement new service(s) and show that the services fit within a comprehensive vision or plan for elder care. If significant elements listed below are not available, programs should consider applying for Category I funding to support the assessment and planning activities necessary for successful program development.

(1)Demographic assessment of the population and assessment of LTC needs on a population basis. a. Population distribution. Number of elderly of different age and gender groups in the population. b. Rates of functional impairment and numbers of elders with need for assistance in activities in daily living with adequate detail to project need for services.

(2)Geographic and social factors that affect access to services and availability of caregivers. a. Rural vs. urban; population density. b. Family structure and organization.

(3)Assessment of cultural and religious values regarding care of the elder for the population(s) to be served.

(4)Assessment of elder preferences for type, structure, and setting of services.

(5)Evaluation of existing services and resources for LTC. a. Availability and organization of existing aging and LTC services. Include services available to Tribal or community members provided by programs or organizations that are not Tribal or AI/AN organizations. b. Availability and organization of health services for the elderly, including Native healing systems. c. Capacity of existing LTC services to support care provided “in the most integrated setting appropriate to the needs of qualified individuals with disabilities” (Olmstead vs. L.C.).

(6)Assessment of caregiver workforce. a. Availability of potential caregivers (formal and informal). b. Training resources for formal and informal caregivers.

(7)Identification of potential resources for new LTC service. a. Funding for program development. b. Funding for ongoing service delivery. c. Potential partners in program development.

(8)Relevant Federal, IHS, Tribal and/or state standards, laws and regulations and codes and relevant licensure or certification requirements.

(9)A comprehensive vision or plan for LTC system/services which incorporates the information above and identifies priorities for implementation.

(10)Unmet need for LTC services. B. Work Plan (35 points). This section should demonstrate the soundness and effectiveness of the applicant's proposal. This includes both the work plan for program implementation and the underlying plan or strategy for sustainability of the service(s) past the point of grant support. Note that attendance and presentation at the annual AI/AN LTC Conference is a requirement of the grant and should be included as an activity in the work plan.

(1)Identify the LTC service(s) to be implemented and show how it: a. Integrates with existing LTC and health services. b. Is Show how it is consistent with the results of the assessment/planning process described above (Introduction and Need for Assistance).

(2)Summarize the business plan or plan for self-sufficiency and sustainability, including: a. Funding stream(s) to support ongoing services. b. Clearly indicate whether the program will be self-supporting (and if so, when) or not. If not self-supporting, what will be the source of additional revenue for services? c. Time line with projections for client recruitment, expected revenue and shortfalls, resources for funds needed to bridge between onset of services and collection of reimbursement, etc. d. Licensure or certification requirements. e. If Tribal revenue is expected to pay in part or in whole for services, indicate this. A letter from the Tribal Council or administration indicating that these funds have been budgeted for this purpose should be included in the appendix.

(3)Describe the approach to implementation. a. Tasks. b. Resources needed to implement and complete the project. c. Time line for implementation. d. Specialized technical resources. e. Training needs. i. Include in work plan attendance and presentation at the annual AI/AN LTC Conference. f. Consultation needs (if any).

(4)Include a detailed work plan in the appendix, containing the following information: a. Action steps on a time line for implementation of the work plan. b. Identify who will perform the action steps. c. Identify who will supervise the action steps. d. Identify who will accept and/or approve work products at the end of the proposed project. e. Include any additional training that will take place during the proposed project, f. If consultants or contractors will be used during the proposed project, please include the following information in their position description and scope of work (or note if consultants/contractors will not be used): i. Educational requirements. ii. Desired qualifications and work experience. iii. Expected work products. iv. Who will supervise the contractor. v. If a potential consultant/contractor has already been identified, please include a resume and letter of commitment in the appendix.

(5)Include a detailed business plan in the appendix, containing the following information: a. Time line with detailed expense and revenue projections. b. Time line with client recruitment projections. c. Time line with licensure or certification requirements and tasks. d. Identification of shortfall funding during implementation with documentation of the availability of budgeted funds to support the program until it is self-sustaining (if applicable). C. Project Evaluation (10 points). This section should show how progress on this project will be assessed and how the success of this project will be judged.

(1)Specifically list and describe the outcomes by which this project will be evaluated.

(2)Identify the evaluator and/or the individual with responsibility for the evaluation (need not be an outside evaluator).

(3)Each proposed project objective and task of the work plan should be able to be evaluated and the evaluation activities should appear on the work plan. D. Organizational Capabilities and Qualifications (10 points). This section outlines the broader capacity of the Tribe, Tribal organization, or urban health program to complete the project outlined in the work plan. It includes the identification of personnel responsible for completing tasks and chain of responsibility for successful completion of the project outlined in the workplan.

(1)Describe the organizational structure of the Tribe/Tribal organization beyond health care activities.

(2)If management systems are already in place, simply note it. (A copy of the 25 CFR part 900, subpart F, is available in the ECILTC application package.)

(1)Categorical budget (Form SF 424A, Budget Information Non-Construction Programs) completing each of the budget periods requested.

(3)Indication of any special start-up costs.

(4)Budget justification should include a brief program narrative for the second year.

(5)If indirect costs are claimed, indicate and apply the current negotiated rate to the budget. Include a copy of the rate agreement in the appendix. 2. Review and Selection Process In addition to the above criteria/requirements, applications are considered according to the following: A. Letter of Intent Submission deadline: May 12, 2006. B. Application Submission deadline: June 5, 2006. Applications submitted in advance of or by the deadline and verified by the postmark will undergo a preliminary review to determine that:

(1)The applicant and proposed project type is eligible in accordance with this grant announcement.

(2)The application is not a duplication of a previously funded project.

(3)The application narrative, forms, and materials submitted meet the requirements of the announcement allowing the review panel to undertake an in-depth evaluation; otherwise, it may be returned. C. Competitive Review of Eligible Applications Objective Review: June 19-30, 2006. Applications meeting eligibility requirements that are complete, responsive, and conform to this program announcement will be reviewed for merit by the Ad Hoc Objective Review Committee

(ORC)appointed by the IHS to review and make recommendations on these applications. Prior to ORC review, the applications will be screened to determine that services and programs proposed are those which the IHS has the authority to provide, either directly or through funding agreement, and that those services and programs are designed for the benefit of IHS beneficiaries. Applications not meeting these requirements will not be reviewed. The ORC review will be conducted in accordance with the IHS Objective Review Guidelines. The technical review process ensures selection of quality projects in a national competition for limited funding. Applications will be evaluated and rated on the basis of the evaluation criteria listed in Section V.1. and V.2. The criteria are used to evaluate the quality of a proposed project, determine the likelihood of success, and assign a numerical score to each application. The scoring of approved applications will assist the IHS in determining which proposals will be funded if the amount of funding is not sufficient to support all approved applications. Applications recommended for approval, having a score of 60 or above by the ORC and scored high enough to be considered for funding, are ranked. Additional considerations in final ranking include: geographic diversity among funded programs, diversity in population size among Tribes and communities served by funded programs, and unique features with regard to type of program planned or population served. Applications scoring below 60 points will be disapproved and returned to the applicant. Applications that are approved but not funded will not be carried over into the next cycle for funding consideration. 3. Anticipated Announcement and Award Dates Anticipated announcement date: July 10-14, 2006. Award date: August 1, 2006. VI. Award Administration Information 1. Award Notices Federal Assistance Award

(FAA)will be initiated by the Division of Grants Operations and will notify the contact person identified on each proposal of the results in writing via postal mail. Applicants whose applications are declared ineligible will receive written notification of the ineligibility determination and their original grant application via postal mail. The ineligible notification will include information regarding the rationale for the ineligible decision citing specific information from the original grant application. Applicants who are approved but unfunded and disapproved will receive a copy of the Executive Summary which identifies the weaknesses and strengths of the application submitted. Applicants which are approved and funded will be notified through the official FAA document. The FAA will serve as the official notification of a grant award and will state the amount of Federal funds awarded, the purpose of the grant, the terms and conditions of the grant award, the effective date of the award, the project period, and the budget period. Any other correspondence announcing to the Applicant's Project Director that an application was recommended for approval is not an authorization to begin performance. Pre-award costs are not allowable pending prior approval from the awarding agency. 2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements Grants Are Administered in Accordance With the Following Documents: A. This cooperative agreement. B. 45 CFR part 92, “Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State, Local, and Tribal Governments”, or 45 CFR part 74, “Uniform Administration Requirements for Awards and Subawards to Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, Other NonProfit Organizations, and Commercial Organizations”. C. Public Health Service Grants Policy Statement. D. Appropriate Cost Principles: OMB Circular A-87, “State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments,” or OMB Circular A-122, “NonProfit Organizations”. E. OMB Circular A-133, “Audits of States, Local Governments, and NonProfit Organizations”. F. Other Applicable OMB circulars. 3. Reporting A. Program progress reports are required within 30 days of the completion of the semi-annual report (commencing with the award date). These reports will include a brief comparison of actual accomplishments to the goals established for the period, reasons for slippage (if applicable), and other pertinent information as required. A final report must be submitted within 90 days of expiration of the budget/project period (at the end of each year of funding). B. Financial Status Reports must be submitted within 30 days of the semi-annual report (commencing with the award date). Final financial status reports are due within 90 days of expiration of the budget/project period (at the end of each year of funding). Standard Form 269 (long form) will be used for financial reporting. Failure to submit required reports within the time allowed may result in suspension or termination of an active grant, withholding of additional awards for the project, or other enforcement actions such as withholding of payments or converting to the reimbursement method of payment. Continued failure to submit required reports may result in one or both of the following:

(1)The imposition of special award provisions; and

(2)the non-funding or non-award of other eligible projects or activities. This applies whether the delinquency is attributable to the failure of the grantee organization or the individual responsible for preparation of the reports. VII. Agency Contact(s) For program-related information regarding the IHS Elder Care Initiative: Bruce Finke, MD, Nashville Area Elder Health Consultant, 45 Vernon Street, Northampton, MA 01060.

(413)584-0790. *bruce.finke@ihs.gov* . For general information regarding this announcement: Ms. Orie Platero, Office of Clinical and Preventive Services (OCPS), Indian Health Service, 801 Thompson Avenue, Suite 326, Rockville, Maryland 20852.

(301)443-2522. For specific grant-related and business management information: Ms. Martha Redhouse, Division of Grants Operations, Indian Health Service, 801 Thompson Avenue, TMP Suite 360, Rockville, Maryland 20852.

(301)443-5204. VIII. Other Information The Department of Health and Human Services

(HHS)is committed to achieving the health promotion and disease prevention objectives of Healthy People 2010, a HHS led activity for setting priority areas. This project will aid the accomplishment of Healthy People 2010 Focus Area 1—Access. Specifically, it will aid the accomplishment of objective 1-15, “Increase the proportion of persons with long-term care needs who have access to the continuum of long-term care services.” Potential applicants may obtain a printed copy of Healthy People 2010, (Summary Report No, 017-001-00549-5) or CD-ROM, Stock No. 017-001-00549-5, through the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7945,

(202)512-1800. You may also access this information at the following Web site: *http://www.healthypeople.gov/Publications* . The IHS is focusing efforts on three Health Initiatives that, linked together, have the potential to achieve positive improvements in the health of American Indian and Alaska Native people. These three initiatives are Health Promotion/Disease Prevention, Management of Chronic Disease, and Behavioral Health. Further information is available at the Health Initiatives Web site: *http://www.ihs.gov/NonMedicalPrograms/DirInitiatives/index.cfm* . Dated: April 10, 2006. Robert G. McSwain, Deputy Director, Indian Health Service. [FR Doc. E6-5608 Filed 4-14-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4165-16-P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request Periodically, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) will publish a summary of information collection requests under OMB review, in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these documents, call the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on

(240)276-1243. Proposed Project: Projects for Assistance in Transition From Homelessness

(PATH)Program Annual Report (OMB No. 0930-0205)—Revision The Center for Mental Health Services awards grants each fiscal year to each of the States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands from allotments authorized under the PATH program established by Public Law 101-645, 42 U.S.C. 290cc-21 *et seq.* , the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Amendments Act of 1990 (section 521 *et seq.* of the Public Health Service

(PHS)Act). Section 522 of the PHS Act requires that the grantee States and Territories must expend their payments under the Act solely for making grants to political subdivisions of the State, and to non-profit private entities (including community-based veterans organizations and other community organizations) for the purpose of providing services specified in the Act. Available funding is allotted in accordance with the formula provision of section 524 of the PHS Act. This submission is for a revision of the current approval of the annual grantee reporting requirements. Section 528 of the PHS Act specifies that not later than January 31 of each fiscal year, a funded entity will prepare and submit a report in such form and containing such information as is determined necessary for securing a record and description of the purposes for which amounts received under section 521 were expended during the preceding fiscal year and of the recipients of such amounts and determining whether such amounts were expended in accordance with statutory provisions. The estimated annual burden for these reporting requirements is summarized in the table below. Respondents Number of respondents Responses per respondent Burden per response (Hrs.) Total burden States 56 1 8 448 Local provider agencies 450 1 31 13,950 Totals 506 14,398 Written comments and recommendations concerning the proposed information collection should be sent by May 17, 2006 to: SAMHSA Desk Officer, Human Resources and Housing Branch, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503; due to potential delays in OMB's receipt and processing of mail sent through the U.S. Postal Service, respondents are encouraged to submit comments by fax to: 202-395-6974. Dated: April 10, 2006. Anna Marsh, Director, Office of Program Services. [FR Doc. E6-5638 Filed 4-14-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4162-20-P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request In compliance with section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 concerning opportunity for public comment on proposed collections of information, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) will publish periodic summaries of proposed projects. To request more information on the proposed projects or to obtain a copy of the information collection plans, call the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on

(240)276-1243. Comments are invited on:

(a)Whether the proposed collections of information are necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility;

(b)the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information;

(c)ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and

(d)ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Proposed Project: Opioid Drugs in Maintenance and Detoxification Treatment of Opioid Dependence—42 CFR part 8 (OMB No. 0930-0206)—Extension This regulation establishes a certification program managed by SAMHSA's Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT). The regulation requires that Opioid Treatment Programs

(OTPs)be certified. “Certification” is the process by which SAMHSA determines that an OTP is qualified to provide opioid treatment under the Federal opioid treatment standards established by the Secretary of Health and Human Services. To become certified, an OTP must be accredited by a SAMHSA-approved accreditation body. The regulation also provides standards for such services as individualized treatment planning, increased medical supervision, and assessment of patient outcomes. This submission seeks continued approval of the information collection requirements in the regulation and of the forms used in implementing the regulation. SAMHSA currently has approval for the Application for Certification to Use Opioid Drugs in a Treatment Program Under 42 CFR 8.11 (Form SMA-162); the Application for Approval as Accreditation Body Under 42 CFR 8.3(b) (Form SMA-163); and the Exception Request and Record of Justification Under 42 CFR 8.12 (Form SMA-168), which may be used on a voluntary basis by physicians when there is a patient care situation in which the physician must make a treatment decision that differs from the treatment regimen required by the regulation. Form SMA-162 is used as the initial application to request certification of an OTP, to request renewal of certification and to change existing information regarding the program's location, sponsor and medical director. This form collects information such as address, program name, contact information, sponsor name and address and medical director name and address. Attachments are required to complete this form regarding the OTPs accrediting status, organizational structure, and operating procedures. Form SMA-163 is used as an application to become a SAMHSA approved accrediting body. This form collects accrediting body name, address and contact information. Attachments are required to complete this form regarding the accrediting body's operating procedures and standards and their staff's education and experience. Form SMA-168 is a simplified, standardized form to facilitate the documentation, request, and approval process for exceptions. This form collects patient admission date, dosage amount, patient status, attendance schedule per week, dates of exception and justification. The tables that follow summarize the annual reporting burden associated with the regulation, including burden associated with the forms. Estimated Annual Reporting Requirement Burden for Accreditation Bodies 42 CFR citation Purpose Number of respondents Responses/respondent Hours/response Total hours 8.3(b)(1-11) Initial approval (SMA-163) 1 1 6.0 6 8.3(c) Renewal of approval (SMA-163) 2 1 1.0 2 8.3(e) Relinquishment notification 1 1 0.5 0.5 8.3(f)(2) Non-renewal notification to accredited OTPs 1 90 0.1 9 8.4(b)(1)(ii) Notification to SAMHSA for seriously noncompliant OTPs 2 2 1.0 4 8.4(b)(1)(iii) Notification to OTP for serious noncompliance 2 10 1.0 20 8.4(d)(1) General documents and information to SAMHSA upon request 6 5 0.5 15 8.4(d)(2) Accreditation survey to SAMHSA upon request 6 75 0.02 9 8.4(d)(3) List of surveys, surveyors to SAMHSA upon request 6 6 0.2 7.2 8.4(d)(4) Report of less than full accreditation to SAMHSA 6 5 0.5 15 8.4(d)(5) Summaries of Inspections 6 50 0.5 150 8.4(e) Notifications of Complaints 6 6 0.5 18 8.6(a)(2) and (b)(3) Revocation notification to Accredited OTPs 1 185 0.3 55.5 8.6(b) Submission of 90-day corrective plan to SAMHSA 1 1 10 10.0 8.6(b)(1) Notification to accredited OTPs of Probationary Status 1 185 0.3 55.0 Total 6 376.2 Estimated Annual Reporting Requirement Burden for Opioid Treatment Programs 42 CFR citation Purpose Number of respondents Responses/respondent Hours/response Total hours 8.11(b) Renewal of approval (SMA-162) 370 1 0.30 111.00 8.11(b) Relocation of Program (SMA-162) 35 1 1.17 40.95 8.11(e)(1) Application for provisional certification 40 1 1 40.00 8.11(e)(2) Application for extension of provisional certification 30 1 0.25 7.50 8.11(f)(5) Notification of sponsor or medical director change (SMA-162) 60 1 0.1 6.00 8.11(g)(2) Documentation to SAMHSA for interim maintenance 1 1 1 1.00 8.11(h) Request to SAMHSA for Exception from 8.11 and 8.12 (including SMA-168) 1150 30 0.07 2415.00 8.11(i)(1) Notification to SAMHSA Before Establishing Medication Units (SMA-162) 10 1 0.25 2.5 8.12(j)(2) Notification to State Health Officer When Patient Begins Interim Maintenance 1 20 0.33 6.6 8.24 Contents of Appellant Request for Review of Suspension 2 1 0.25 .50 8.25(a) Informal Review Request 2 1 1.00 2.00 8.26(a) Appellant's Review File and Written Statement 2 1 5.00 10.00 8.28(a) Appellant's Request for Expedited Review 2 1 1.00 2.00 8.28(c) Appellant Review File and Written Statement 2 1 5.00 10.00 Total 1,150 2655.05 Send comments to Summer King, SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer, Room 7-1044, One Choke Cherry Road, Rockville, MD 20857. Written comments should be received within 60 days of this notice. Dated: April 10, 2006. Anna Marsh, Director, Office of Program Services. [FR Doc. E6-5644 Filed 4-14-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4162-20-P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Statement of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of Authority Part M of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Statement of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of Authority for the Department of Health and Human Services at 70 FR 30961-30962, May 31, 2005, is amended to reflect changes of the functional statements for the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP). This amendment is necessary to reflect the restructuring of CSAP, including the abolishment of three current CSAP divisions, (Division of State and Community Assistance (DSCA), Division of Knowledge Application and Systems Improvement (DKASI), and Division of Prevention Education (DPE)), and replacing them with three new divisions, Division of State Programs, Division of Community Programs, and Division of Systems Development, and replacing the functional statement for the Division of Workplace Programs (MPE). The proposed restructuring will have a significant and positive impact on organizational effectiveness. These changes will enhance program accountability; provide more clarity and direction for CSAP staff, and promote achievement of crosscutting prevention objectives and flexibility. The changes are as follows: *Section M.20, Functions* is amended as follows:

(A)The functional statements for the Center of Substance Abuse Prevention (MP), Office of the Director (MP-1), Office of Program Analysis and Coordination (MPA), Division of State and Community Assistance (DSCA), Division of Knowledge Application and Systems Improvement (DKASI), Division of Prevention Education

(DPE)and the Division of Workplace are replaced with the following: Center for Substance Abuse Prevention

(MP)The mission of the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention

(CSAP)is to build resiliency and facilitate recovery. CSAP provides national leadership in the development of policies, programs and services to prevent the onset of illegal drug, underage alcohol, and tobacco use. CSAP disseminates effective substance abuse prevention practices and builds the capacity of States, communities and other organizations to apply prevention knowledge effectively. An integrated systems approach is used to coordinate these activities and collaborate with other Federal, State, public and private organizations. Office of the Director

(1)Provides leadership, coordination, and direction in the development and implementation of CSAP goals and priorities, and serves as the focal point for the Department's efforts on substance abuse and HIV/AIDS prevention;

(2)plans, directs, and provides overall administration of the programs and activities of CSAP;

(3)provides leadership in the identification of new and emerging issues, and the integration of primary prevention, early intervention, re-entry and relapse prevention, knowledge and information in the major CSAP programs;

(4)manages special projects and external liaison activities; and

(5)directs CSAP's overall human resource activities and monitors the conduct of equal employment opportunity activities for CSAP. Office of Program Analysis and Coordination

(1)Supports the Center's implementation of programs and policies by providing guidance in the administration, analysis, planning, and coordination of the Center's programs, consistent with agency priorities;

(2)manages the Center's participation in the agency's policy, planning, budget formulation and execution, program development and clearance, and internal and external requests, including strategic planning, identification of program priorities, development of Healthy People 2010, and other agency-wide and departmental planning activities;

(3)provides support for the Center Director; coordinates staff development activities, analyzes the impact of proposed legislation and rule-making; supports administrative functions, including human resource actions; conducts special studies; serves as liaison for special populations/initiatives including White House Executive Orders for specific minority populations;

(4)manages CSAP's National Advisory Council activities; and

(5)coordinates CSAP's evaluation program. Division of State Programs

(MPJ)The Division of State Programs is responsible for carrying out the Center's agenda to increase capacity and improve accessibility of effective substance abuse prevention across States, American Indian/Alaska Native Tribes, and tribal organizations. The Division provides most program services through two regional teams. The Division

(1)plans, develops and administers programs to implement comprehensive and effective State substance abuse prevention systems and other related health promotion systems;

(2)promotes and establishes comprehensive, long-term State and tribal substance abuse prevention/intervention policies, programs, practices, and support activities to address substance abuse and related emerging issues;

(3)administers the prevention set-aside of the Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment

(SAPT)Block Grant;

(4)collaborates with other units in the application of SAMHSA's Strategic Prevention Framework with States and Tribes;

(5)develops funding announcements, ensures coordination with grant management systems, and administers national discretionary grant programs, such as the Strategic Prevention Framework State Incentive grant (SPF SIG) program;

(6)administers the Synar regulations governing youth access to tobacco products;

(7)works across CSAP and SAMHSA to promote inter/intra-agency collaboration at the Federal, State and tribal levels; serves as the liaison for CSAP interactions with State agency and National Prevention Network officials on State issues; monitors State progress in achieving National Outcome Measures and plans for associated technical assistance; monitors compliance with Block Grant and other Federal requirements. Division of Community Programs

(MPH)The Division of Community Programs is responsible for carrying out the Center's agenda to increase capacity and improve accessibility of effective substance abuse prevention services across communities. This includes management of all CSAP grants targeted to communities and non-profit organizations, such as Drug Free Communities, HIV/AIDS, methamphetamine, and conference grants. The Division is organized into three branches with responsibility to

(1)plan, develop, and administer programs of regional and national significance to enhance comprehensive and effective community substance abuse prevention systems, including disaster relief programs;

(2)promote and establish comprehensive substance abuse prevention/intervention policies, programs, practices, and support services to address substance abuse and emerging issues;

(3)collaborate with other units in the application of SAMHSA's Strategic Prevention Framework in community prevention systems;

(4)develop funding announcements, ensure coordination with grant management systems, and administer discretionary grant programs;

(5)work across SAMHSA to promote interagency collaboration;

(6)monitor grantee and contractor progress in achieving National Outcome Measures, and plan associated technical assistance; and

(7)monitor compliance with all Federal requirements. Division of Systems Development

(MPI)The Division of Systems Development provides leadership and guidance in the planning, development, and implementation of programs and prevention concepts across the Center, and is responsible for carrying out the Center's health promotion and public education activities. The Division's responsibilities include

(1)promotion and implementation of key prevention concepts across all programs and activities of the Center, including the Strategic Prevention Framework, project sustainability, and coordination/integration of community and State programs;

(2)management of technical assistance contracts that support all of the Center's prevention programs;

(3)coordination of CSAP's GPRA and National Outcome Measure activities, including liaison with offices responsible for data collection;

(4)analysis of data related to program operations and assistance to other CSAP components in employing data to improve program performance;

(5)analysis, development, and integration of information, including evidence-based practices and NREPP programs, necessary to improve State and community prevention service delivery;

(6)leadership within SAMHSA in the development, training and use of geographic information system

(GIS)resources to improve policy development and program operations;

(7)collaboration with Federal, State, and local governments to promote the adoption of evidence-based prevention programs and practices and develop innovative strategies to address emerging substance abuse issues;

(8)initiation, development, and coordination of efforts to support workforce development for substance abuse prevention professionals;

(9)leadership to the Center in the development of health promotion and education products, materials, messages, publications, and information technologies;

(10)collaboration with other Federal and private sector prevention initiatives in developing and disseminating targeted prevention material, including the SAMHSA Office of Communications;

(11)development and continual update of prevention material for use by external prevention partners. Division of Workplace Programs

(1)Establishes goals and objectives in the administration of a national program designed to promote substance abuse free workplaces;

(2)provides leadership and oversight to assure that effective employee assistance programs are developed and evaluated to prevent substance abuse in the workplace;

(3)develops, implements, and evaluates employee education/prevention programs, access to counseling, early intervention, and referral treatment/rehabilitation, and support services for employees following treatment/rehabilitation;

(4)advises, coordinates, and certifies activities related to the implementation and administration of federal drug free workplace programs, convenes the Drug Testing Advisory Board, and conducts surveys on federal programs;

(5)advises other SAMHSA components and HHS regarding workplace programmatic directions and actions and enters into collaborative arrangements with other federal agencies;

(6)collaborates in the development and implementation of substance abuse prevention and early intervention strategies for public/private sector use at the State and community levels, and operates the Workplace Hotline Contract as a means for dissemination, outreach and technical assistance to businesses, States and communities;

(7)provides technical assistance to facilitate national training and certification programs for substance abuse professionals and practitioners, provides staff expertise in training and credentialing standards for medical review officers

(MROs)and the Department of Transportation mandated substance abuse professionals;

(8)provides leadership within SAMHSA and the field in developing and disseminating knowledge in workplace violence related to substance abuse, including risk factors in the workplace and community and the role of the workplace as a substance abuse and violence prevention agent within the community and family; and

(9)evaluates managed care and other treatment provider practices as they are applied in the workplace. Delegations of Authority All delegations and redelegations of authority to officers and employees of SAMHSA which were in effect immediately prior to the effective date of this reorganization shall continue in effect pending further redelegations, providing they are consistent with the reorganization. These organizational changes are effective March 7, 2006. Charles G. Curie, Administrator. [FR Doc. E6-5694 Filed 4-14-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160-01-P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard [CGD17-06-003] Prince William Sound Regional Citizens' Advisory Council (PWSRCAC) Charter Renewal AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. ACTION: Notice of Recertification. SUMMARY: Under the Oil Terminal and Tanker Environmental Oversight Act of 1990, the Coast Guard may certify on an annual basis, an alternative voluntary advisory group in lieu of a regional citizens' advisory council for Prince William Sound, Alaska. This certification allows the PWSRCAC to monitor the activities of terminal facilities and crude oil tankers under the Prince William Sound Program established by the statute. The purpose of this notice is to inform the public that the Coast Guard has recertified the alternative voluntary advisory group for Prince William Sound, Alaska. DATES: This recertification is effective for the period from March 24, 2006 through February 28, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LCDR Matt Jones, Seventeenth Coast Guard District, Prevention Division, by phone at (907)463-2809, or by mail at P.O. Box 25517; Juneau, Alaska 99802. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background and Purpose As part of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, Congress passed the Oil Terminal and Oil Tanker Environmental Oversight and Monitoring Act of 1990 (the Act), 33 U.S.C. 2732, to foster a long-term partnership among industry, government, and local communities in overseeing compliance with environmental concerns in the operation of crude oil terminals and oil tankers. On October 18, 1991, the President delegated his authority under 33 U.S.C 2732(o) to the Secretary of Transportation in Executive Order 12777, section 8(g) (see 56 FR 54757; October 22, 1991) for purposes of certifying advisory councils, or groups, subject to the Act. On March 3, 1992, the Secretary redelegated that authority to the Commandant of the USCG (see 57 FR 8582; March 11, 1992). The Commandant redelegated that authority to the Chief, Office of Marine Safety, Security and Environmental Protection (G-M) on March 19, 1992 (letter #5402). On July 7, 1993, the USCG published a policy statement, 58 FR 36504, to clarify the factors that shall be considered in making the determination as to whether advisory councils, or groups, should be certified in accordance with the Act. The Assistant Commandant for Marine Safety and Environmental Protection (G-M), redelegated recertification authority for advisory councils, or groups, to the Commander, Seventeenth Coast Guard District on February 26, 1999 (letter #16450). On September 16, 2002, the USCG published a policy statement, 67 FR 58440, that changed the recertification procedures such that applicants are required to provide the USCG with comprehensive information every three years (triennially). For each of the two years between the triennial application procedure, applicants submit a letter requesting recertification that includes a description of any substantive changes to the information provided at the previous triennial recertification. Further, public comment is not solicited prior to recertification during streamlined years, only during the triennial comprehensive review. Recertification By letter dated March 2, 2006, the Commander, Seventeenth Coast Guard certified that the PWSRCAC qualifies as an alternative voluntary advisory group under 33 U.S.C. 2732(o). This recertification terminates on February 28, 2007. Dated: March 24, 2006. James C. Olson, Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Seventeenth Coast Guard District. [FR Doc. E6-5604 Filed 4-14-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-15-P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard [USCG-2006-24443] Ballast Water Reporting by Foreign-flag Vessels Bound for the Great Lakes. AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Coast Guard announces this notice as clarification of the ballast water reporting requirements for foreign-flag vessels bound for the Great Lakes from outside the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). DATES: This notice is effective on April 17, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this notice, contact LT Keith Donohue, Environmental Standards Division, Coast Guard, telephone 202-267-0500, e-mail: *kdonohue@comdt.uscg.mil* . If you have questions about viewing material on the docket, call Ms. Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-493-0402. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background and Purpose The reporting requirements of 33 CFR 151.2041 apply to all foreign-flag vessels with ballast water tanks that are bound for the Great Lakes, unless exempted by 33 CFR 151.2010 and 151.2015. Foreign-flag vessels do not include U.S. and Canadian-flag vessels. These requirements were amended by the final rule entitled “Penalties for Non-Submission of Ballast Water Management Reports,” published in the **Federal Register** on June 14, 2004. *See* 69 FR 32864. That final rule mandated that all foreign-flag vessels must provide the complete information required in 33 CFR 151.2045 when bound for the Great Lakes from beyond the EEZ, and gave these vessels two options for doing so. The first option allows reports to be sent to the appropriate authority established in 33 CFR 151.2041(b)(1)(i) using the Coast Guard Ballast Water Reporting Form, OMB form Control No. 1625-0069. As an alternative, 33 CFR 151.2041(b)(1)(ii) allows foreign-flag vessels to complete the ballast water information section of the St. Lawrence Seaway “Pre-entry Information from Foreign Flagged Vessels Form” and submit it in accordance with the applicable Seaway Notice. However, the Coast Guard highlights through this notice that, if this second option is used, the owners and operators of these vessels must still ensure they provide all the information required by 33 CFR 151.2045 to be in compliance with the ballast water reporting requirements. If the Pre-entry form used to make the applicable Seaway Notice does not provide ample space for all the information required by 33 CFR 151.2045, the information must still be provided. This can be accomplished either with an annotated version of the Pre-entry form or an accompanying Coast Guard Ballast Water Reporting Form. Also, if the information required by 33 CFR 151.2041 is submitted within the Seaway Notice 96 hours prior to arrival and the vessel's ballast information subsequently changes, an amended form must be submitted before the vessel departs the waters of the United States. In addition, the Coast Guard published a Notice of Policy entitled “Ballast Water Management for Vessels Entering the Great Lakes that Declare No Ballast Onboard” in the **Federal Register** on August 31, 2005. *See* 70 FR 51831. The Coast Guard Ballast Water Reporting Form, with sections 4 and 5 properly completed, is the only means of documenting a vessel's implementation of the voluntary best management practices described in the August 31, 2005 Notice of Policy. *See* 70 FR 51831. Finally, to further avoid confusion and reporting submission issues, the Coast Guard recommends each foreign-flag vessel that enters the Great Lakes from outside the EEZ should submit the required information using the Coast Guard Ballast Water Reporting Form to either the Coast Guard Captain of the Port Buffalo, Massena Detachment or the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation, at least 24 hours before the vessel arrives in Montreal, Quebec, in addition to the Pre-entry form required by the applicable Seaway Notice. The fax number for the Coast Guard Captain of the Port Buffalo, Massena Detachment is 315-769-5032, and the fax number for the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation is 315-764-3250. Dated: April 5, 2006. H.L. Hime, Acting Director of Standards, Assistant Commandant for Prevention, U.S. Coast Guard. [FR Doc. E6-5652 Filed 4-14-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-15-P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Federal Emergency Management Agency [FEMA-1635-DR] Missouri; Major Disaster and Related Determinations AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Missouri (FEMA-1635-DR), dated April 5, 2006, and related determinations. DATES: Effective Date: April 5, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472,

(202)646-2705. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter dated April 5, 2006, the President declared a major disaster under the authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121-5206 (the Stafford Act), as follows: I have determined that the damage in certain areas of the State of Missouri resulting from severe storms, tornadoes, and flooding during the period of March 30 to April 3, 2006, is of sufficient severity and magnitude to warrant a major disaster declaration under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121-5206 (the Stafford Act). Therefore, I declare that such a major disaster exists in the State of Missouri. In order to provide Federal assistance, you are hereby authorized to allocate from funds available for these purposes such amounts as you find necessary for Federal disaster assistance and administrative expenses. You are authorized to provide Individual Assistance and assistance for debris removal and emergency protective measures (Categories A and B) under the Public Assistance program in the designated areas, as well as Hazard Mitigation throughout the State and any other forms of assistance under the Stafford Act you may deem appropriate, subject to completion of Preliminary Damage Assessments (PDAs), unless the incident is of such unusual severity and magnitude that PDAs are not required to determine the need for supplemental Federal assistance pursuant to 44 CFR 206.33(d). Consistent with the requirement that Federal assistance be supplemental, any Federal funds provided under the Stafford Act for Public Assistance, Hazard Mitigation, and Other Needs Assistance will be limited to 75 percent of the total eligible costs. Further, you are authorized to make changes to this declaration to the extent allowable under the Stafford Act. The time period prescribed for the implementation of section 310(a), Priority to Certain Applications for Public Facility and Public Housing Assistance, 42 U.S.C. 5153, shall be for a period not to exceed six months after the date of this declaration. The Federal Emergency Management Agency

(FEMA)hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Acting Director, Department of Homeland Security, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Thomas J. Costello, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this declared disaster. I do hereby determine the following areas of the State of Missouri to have been affected adversely by this declared major disaster: Pemiscot County for Individual Assistance. Andrew, Pemiscot, and Pettis Counties for debris removal and emergency protective measures (Categories A and B) under the Public Assistance program. All counties within the State of Missouri are eligible to apply for assistance under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program. (The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers

(CFDA)are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individual and Household Housing; 97.049, Individual and Household Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individual and Household Program—Other Needs, 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.) R. David Paulison, Acting Director, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security. [FR Doc. E6-5664 Filed 4-14-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110-10-P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Federal Emergency Management Agency [FEMA-1634-DR] Tennessee; Major Disaster and Related Determinations AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Tennessee (FEMA-1634-DR), dated April 5, 2006, and related determinations. EFFECTIVE DATE: April 5, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472,

(202)646-2705. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter dated April 5, 2006. the President declared a major disaster under the authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121-5206 (the Stafford Act), as follows: I have determined that the damage in certain areas of the State of Tennessee resulting from severe storms and tornadoes during the period of April 2-3, 2006, is of sufficient severity and magnitude to warrant a major disaster declaration under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121-5206 (the Stafford Act). Therefore, I declare that such a major disaster exists in the State of Tennessee. In order to provide Federal assistance, you are hereby authorized to allocate from funds available for these purposes such amounts as you find necessary for Federal disaster assistance and administrative expenses. You are authorized to provide Individual Assistance in the designated areas and any other forms of assistance under the Stafford Act you may deem appropriate, subject to completion of Preliminary Damage Assessments (PDAs), unless you determine that the incident is of such unusual severity and magnitude that PDAs are not required to determine the need for supplemental Federal assistance pursuant to 44 CFR 206.33(d). Consistent with the requirement that Federal assistance be supplemental, any Federal funds provided under the Stafford Act for Other Needs Assistance will be limited to 75 percent of the total eligible costs. If Public Assistance and Hazard Mitigation are later requested and warranted, Federal funding under these programs will also be limited to 75 percent of the total eligible costs. Further, you are authorized to make changes to this declaration to the extent allowable under the Stafford Act. The time period prescribed for the implementation of section 310(a), Priority to Certain Applications for Public Facility and Public Housing Assistance, 42 U.S.C. 5153, shall be for a period not to exceed six months after the date of this declaration. The Federal Emergency Management Agency

(FEMA)hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Acting Director, Department of Homeland Security, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Michael Karl, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this declared disaster. I do hereby determine the following areas of the State of Tennessee to have been affected adversely by this declared major disaster: Dyer and Gibson Counties for Individual Assistance. (The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers

(CFDA)are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individual and Household Housing; 97.049, Individual and Household Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individual and Household Program—Other Needs, 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.) R. David Paulison, *Acting Director, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.* [FR Doc. E6-5662 Filed 4-14-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6718-10-P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Federal Emergency Management Agency [FEMA-1634-DR] Tennessee; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the State of Tennessee (FEMA-1634-DR), dated April 5, 2006, and related determinations. EFFECTIVE DATE: April 10, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472,

(202)646-2705. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this declared disaster is now April 2-8, 2006. (The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers

(CFDA)are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs, 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.) R. David Paulison, Acting Director, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security. [FR Doc. E6-5663 Filed 4-14-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6718-10-P DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT [Docket No. FR-5037-N-21] Multifamily Building Conformance With the Fair Housing Accessibility Guidelines: Improving the Methodology AGENCY: Office of the Chief Information Officer, HUD. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The proposed information collection requirement described below has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget

(OMB)for review, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act. The Department is soliciting public comments on the subject proposal. The purpose of this information collection is to gather data on the degree to which buildings conform to Accessibility Guidelines of the Fair Housing Act. Interviews with building code officials, builders and architects will also be conducted to learn more about their understanding of the Requirements. DATES: *Comments Due Date:* May 17, 2006. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding this proposal. Comments should refer to the proposal by name and/or OMB approval Number (2528-Pending) and should be sent to: HUD Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503; fax: 202-395-6974. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lillian Deitzer, Reports Management Officer, AYO, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20410; e-mail Lillian Deitzer at *Lillian_L_Deitzer@HUD.gov* or telephone

(202)708-2374. This is not a toll-free number. Copies of available documents submitted to OMB may be obtained from Ms. Deitzer. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice informs the public that the Department of Housing and Urban Development has submitted to OMB a request for approval of the information collection described below. This notice is soliciting comments from members of the public and affecting agencies concerning the proposed collection of information to:

(1)Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility;

(2)Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information;

(3)Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and

(ALCP)and Emergency Capital Repair Program

(ECRP)AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing Commissioner, HUD. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The proposed information collection requirement described below will be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget

(OMB)for review, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act. The Department is soliciting public comments on the subject proposal. DATES: *Comments Due Date:* June 16, 2006. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding this proposal. Comments should refer to the proposal by name and/or OMB Control Number and should be sent to: Lillian Deitzer, Reports Management Officer, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street, SW., L'Enfant Plaza Building, Room 8003, Washington, DC 20410 or *Lillian_Deitzer@hud.gov.* FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Willie Spearmon, Director, Office of Housing Assistance and Grant Administration, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20410, telephone

(202)708-3000, (this is not a toll free number) for copies of the proposed forms and other available information. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department is submitting the proposed information collection to OMB for review, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended). This Notice is soliciting comments from members of the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information to:

(1)Evaluate whether the proposed collection is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility;

(2)Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information;

(3)Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and

(ALCP)and Emergency Capital Repair Program (ECRP). *OMB Control Number, if applicable:* 2502-0542. *Description of the need for the information and proposed use:* The information collection is a grant application and reporting forms for HUD's Assisted Living Conversion Program

(ALCP)and Emergency Capital Repair Program (ECRP). HUD uses the applications to determine an applicant's need for and capacity to administer grant funds. The applicants are usually not-for-profit institutions. HUD will evaluate applications through the use of statutory and administratively designated selection criteria. *Agency form numbers, if applicable:* HUD-50080-ALCP, HUD-50080-ECRP, HUD-92045, HUD-424B, HUD-424C, HUD-2530, HUD-2880, HUD-2990, HUD-2991, HUD-96010, HUD-27300, HUD-92046, and HUD-92047. *Estimation of the total numbers of hours needed to prepare the information collection including number of respondents, frequency of response, and hours of response:* The estimated total number of burden hours needed to prepare the information collection is 2,390; the number of respondents is 90 generating approximately 585 annual responses; the frequency of response is quarterly, semi-annually, and annually; and the estimated time needed to prepare the response varies from 15 minutes to 16 hours. *Status of the proposed information collection:* This is a revision of a currently approved collection. *Authority:* The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C., Chapter 35, as amended. Dated: April 11, 2006. Frank L. Davis, General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Housing, Deputy Federal Housing Commissioner. [FR Doc. E6-5668 Filed 4-14-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4210-67-P DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT [Docket No. FR-5041-N-11] Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Comment Request; Single Family Property Disposition and Acquisition (Conveyance) of Mortgaged Properties AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing Commissioner, HUD. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The proposed information collection requirement described below will be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget

(OMB)for review, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act. The Department is soliciting public comments on the subject proposal. DATES: *Comments Due Date:* June 16, 2006. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding this proposal. Comments should refer to the proposal by name and/or OMB Control Number and should be sent to: Lillian Deitzer, Reports Management Officer, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street, SW., L'Enfant Plaza Building, Room 8003, Washington, DC 20410 or *Lilllian_Deitzer@hud.gov.* FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Everett, Office of Single Family Asset Management, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW., Washington, DC 20410, telephone

(202)708-0614 (this is not a toll free number) for copies of the proposed forms and other available information. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department is submitting the proposed information collection to OMB for review, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended). This Notice is soliciting comments from members of the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information to:

(1)Evaluate whether the proposed collection is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility;

(2)Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information;

(3)Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and

(4)Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond; including the use of appropriate automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. This Notice also lists the following information: *Title of Proposal:* Single Family Property Disposition and Acquisition (Conveyance) of Mortgaged Properties. *OMB Control Number, if applicable:* 2502-0306. *Description of the need for the information and proposed use:* HUD collects information to determine the condition of the property upon conveyance, to determine the results of the repair contracts, and to monitor the contractor's performance in maintaining the properties. The sales contracts will be used as binding contracts between the purchaser and HUD. In addition, HUD requires information regarding HUD-owned single family properties purchased by local governments through the $Home Sales Program. There are two new forms dealing with the disposition of HUD-owned properties that are financed with HUD's 203(k) program of rehabilitation. *Agency form numbers, if applicable:* HUD-9516-A, HUD 9519, HUD-9519-A, HUD-9544, HUD-9548, HUD-9548-A, HUD-9548-B, HUD-9548-C, HUD-9548-D, HUD-9548-E, HUD-9548-F, HUD-9548-G, HUD-9548-H, HUD-9549, HUD-9549-A, HUD-9549-B, HUD-9549-C, HUD-9549-D, and HUD-9549-E. *Estimation of the total numbers of hours needed to prepare the information collection including number of respondents, frequency of response, and hours of response:* The estimated number of burden hours needed to prepare the information collection is 102,632 hours; the number of respondents is 13,735 generating approximately 348,439 annual responses; the frequency of response is on occasion; and the estimated time needed to prepare the response varies from two minutes to one hour per response. *Status of the proposed information collection:* This is a revision of a currently approved collection. *Authority:* The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C., Chapter 35, as amended. Dated: April 11, 2006. Frank L. Davis, General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Housing, Deputy Federal Housing Commissioner. [FR Doc. E6-5669 Filed 4-14-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4210-67-P DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT [Docket No. FR-5037-N-22] Personal Financial and Credit Statement AGENCY: Office of the Chief Information Officer, HUD. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The proposed information collection requirement described below has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget

(OMB)for review, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act. The Department is soliciting public comments on the subject proposal. This information collection is used to conduct a credit investigation of the sponsor, mortgagor, and general contractor to evaluate the character, capital, and ability to develop, build, complete and maintain a multifamily project. DATES: *Comments Due Date:* May 17, 2006. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding this proposal. Comments should refer to the proposal by name and/or OMB approval Number (2502-0001) and should be sent to: HUD Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503; fax: 202-395-6974. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lillian Deitzer, Reports Management Officer, AYO, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20410; e-mail Lillian Deitzer at *Lillian_L_Deitzer@HUD.gov* or telephone

(1)Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility;

(2)Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information;

(3)Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and

(4)Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond; including through the use of appropriate automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. This Notice Also Lists the Following Information *Title of Proposal:* Personal Financial and Credit Statement. *OMB Approval Number:* 2502-0001. *Form Numbers:* HUD-92417. *Description of the Need for the Information and its Proposed Use:* This information collection is used to conduct a credit investigation of the sponsor, mortgagor, and general contractor to evaluate the character, capital, and ability to develop, build, complete, and maintain a multifamily project. *Frequency of Submission:* On occasion. Number of respondents Annual responses × Hours per response = Burden hours Reporting Burden 2,000 1 8 16,000 *Total Estimated Burden Hours:* 16,000. *Status:* Extension of a currently approved collection. Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 35, as amended. Dated: April 12, 2006. Lillian L. Deitzer, Departmental Paperwork Reduction Act Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. E6-5671 Filed 4-14-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4210-67-P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service Sport Fishing and Boating Partnership Council AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of meeting. SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Fish and Wildlife Service announces a meeting designed to foster partnerships to enhance public awareness of the importance of aquatic resources and the social and economic benefits of recreational fishing and boating in the United States. This meeting, sponsored by the Sport Fishing and Boating Partnership Council (Council), is open to the public, and interested persons may make oral statements to the Council or may file written statements for consideration. DATES: The meeting will be held on Tuesday, April 25, 2006, from 9 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Department of the Interior, Room 5160, 1849 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20240; telephone

(703)358-2336. Summary minutes of the conference will be maintained by the Council Coordinator at 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, MS-3101-AEA, Arlington, VA 22203, and will be available for public inspection during regular business hours within 30 days following the meeting. Personal copies may be purchased for the cost of duplication. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Douglas Hobbs, Council Coordinator, at

(703)358-2336. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Sport Fishing and Boating Partnership Council was formed in January 1993 to advise the Secretary of the Interior, through the Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, about sport fishing and boating issues. The Council represents the interests of the public and private sectors of the sport fishing and boating communities and is organized to enhance partnerships among industry, constituency groups, and government. The 18-member Council includes the Director of the Service and the president of the International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, who both serve in ex officio capacities. Other Council members are Directors from State agencies responsible for managing recreational fish and wildlife resources and individuals who represent the interests of saltwater and freshwater recreational fishing, recreational boating, the recreational fishing and boating industries, recreational fisheries resource conservation, aquatic resource outreach and education, and tourism. The Council will convene to discuss:

(1)The Council's continuing role in providing input to the Fish and Wildlife Service on the Service's strategic plan for its Fisheries Program;

(2)the Council's work on the National Fish Habitat Initiative as both a lead partner and its role as lead in building a Fish Habitat Partners Coalition;

(3)the Council's work in its role as a facilitator of discussions with Federal and State agencies and other sport fishing and boating interests concerning a variety of national boating and fisheries management issues;

(4)the Council's issues of strategic concern for its coming term and

(5)the Council's role in providing the Interior Secretary with information about the implementation of the Strategic Plan for the National Outreach and Communications Program. The Interior Secretary approved the Strategic Plan in February 1999, as well as the five-year, $36-million federally funded outreach campaign authorized by the 1998 Sportfishing and Boating Safety Act that is now being implemented by the Recreational Boating and Fishing Foundation, a private, nonprofit organization. Dated: March 29, 2006. Kenneth Stansell, Acting Director. [FR Doc. 06-3640 Filed 4-14-06; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 18

Traces to 18 documents

U.S. Code