Notices. Notice of an amended computer matching program, which is expected to begin April 11, 2006

17,740 words·~81 min read·/register/2006/03/16/06-2561

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-53455; File No. SR-OCC-2005-22] Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation; Order Granting Approval of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to Allocations Processing March 8, 2006. I. Introduction On December 13, 2005, The Options Clearing Corporation (“OCC”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) proposed rule change SR-OCC-2005-22 pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”). 1 Notice of the proposal was published in the **Federal Register** on January 30, 2006. 2 No comment letters were received.

For the reasons discussed below, the Commission is granting approval of the proposed rule change. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53150 (January 19, 2006), 71 FR 4953. II. Description The proposed rule change relates to new Rule 405, “Allocations,” which governs the processing of post-trade allocation instructions by clearing members. OCC installed a new system to process post-trade allocation instructions in January 2006, and in order to accommodate the immediate use of the allocation system for commodity contracts cleared by OCC that are subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), OCC adopted Rule 405 by submitting File No.

SR-OCC-2005-21 for immediate effectiveness pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act. 3 OCC included Interpretation and Policy .02 to Rule 405 to provide that the new system could not be used for positions in contracts which are subject to the Commission's jurisdiction ( *i.e.* , securities options or security futures) until the Commission issued an order approving the use of Rule 405 and the new system for processing post-trade allocations with respect to such positions. The purpose of the proposed rule change is to obtain such Commission approval and to delete Interpretation and Policy .02 to Rule 405. 3 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53151 (January 19, 2006), 71 FR 4951 (January 30, 2006).

The new allocation system and Rule 405 provide clearing members with a centralized system for processing allocation or “give-up” instructions across all exchanges for which OCC provides clearing services. Allocations are post-trade instructions entered by one clearing member ( *i.e.* , an authorized “executing” or “giving-up” clearing member) that direct OCC to move a transaction or position to the account of another clearing member ( *i.e.* , the “carrying” or “given-up” clearing member).

Post-trade allocations of securities options have been processed through OCC's Clearing Member Trade Assignment (“CMTA”) functionality, which normally causes a transaction to automatically be moved into an account of the carrying clearing member so long as the executing and carrying clearing members have an effective CMTA arrangement registered with OCC for the exchange submitting the matching trade information for that transaction. 4 Under the new allocation system, clearing members will be able to elect either to continue to use the existing CMTA system or to use the new allocation system for securities options. 4 OCC Rule 403.

Most post-trade allocations of commodity futures cleared through OCC have been processed through The Clearing Corporation's (“CCorp”) “give-up” system, which requires the given-up clearing member to affirmatively accept a transaction. 5 OCC's new allocation system has enabled clearing members to process commodity futures “give-ups” without going through the CCorp system. 5 OCC Rule 404. New Rule 405 currently governs the processing of allocation instructions for contracts subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the CFTC.

As amended by this proposed rule change, Rule 405 will operate in the same fashion for contracts subject to the Commission's jurisdiction. Transactions will first clear in the designated account of the giving-up clearing member. Instructions to allocate positions may be submitted either through an exchange's system for providing matching trade information to OCC or through OCC's clearing system, ENCORE. In either case, if the given-up and giving-up clearing members are parties to an allocation agreement that has been registered with OCC, OCC will automatically allocate the positions resulting from an allocation instruction to a designated account of the given-up clearing member without further action by the clearing members. 6 If the clearing members are not parties to a registered allocation agreement, OCC will not effect the allocation instruction until the given-up clearing member gives OCC notice of its affirmative acceptance of the allocated positions.

(In contrast, the CMTA system does not allow for acceptance of allocated positions without a registered CMTA agreement.) If the given-up clearing member does not give OCC notice of such acceptance by an OCC-specified deadline, the allocation instruction will not be processed, and the positions will remain in the account of the giving-up clearing member, which will remain responsible for the positions. 6 Unlike CMTAs, clearing members will not be required to register their allocation arrangement by exchange.

A given-up clearing member will be responsible for appropriately allocated positions. Given-up positions are moved to the given-up clearing member's account at the premium price in the case of options or at the contract price in the case of futures at which the positions were established by the executing clearing member. Positions that are allocated on an intraday basis will not be reflected in position reports until the following business day. However, OCC will take those positions into account in processing any intraday settlements authorized by its By-laws and Rules, including intraday margin settlements.

A given-up clearing member may enter an instruction to reverse an allocation that was accepted in error. If the given-up and giving-up clearing members are parties to a registered allocation agreement, the reversing instruction will be automatically processed. If the clearing members are not parties to a registered allocation agreement, the reversing instruction must be affirmatively accepted by the original giving-up clearing member. Allocation instructions may be for a single position ( *i.e.* , a position in a given series established at a single price) or for a group of positions ( *i.e.* , positions in the same series established at different prices).

Allocation instructions for grouped positions must be submitted through ENCORE. For single positions, the instruction must identify the contract quantity, series, and price as specified in the matching trade information. For grouped positions, the allocation instruction must provide the same information, but the price may be an average price if not prohibited under exchange rules and applicable law. 7 For the convenience of clearing members, OCC's system will produce a suggested average price for grouped allocations that clearing members may adopt for purposes of processing the instruction. 7 Average pricing is permitted under the Commodity Exchange Act in certain circumstances.

In those circumstances, a clearing member may instruct OCC to use the average price in clearing and settling the trades. Clearing members have requested that OCC provide functionality that would also permit positions in securities options and security futures to be allocated at an average price. Accordingly, OCC has developed its allocation system to accommodate the use of such prices for security options and security futures, provided that such use does not violate exchange rules or applicable law.

Registration of allocation agreements may be terminated either by mutual agreement or unilaterally. Mutually terminated registrations will be effected immediately in OCC's system. Unilaterally terminated registrations will be terminated in OCC's system effective as of 8 a.m. CST the business day after the termination notice is received by OCC and the other clearing member. These are the same standards currently applied to terminating CMTA arrangements under OCC Rule 403. Following termination of registration of an allocation agreement, an allocated position may be allocated to a given-up clearing member only upon its affirmative acceptance.

III. Discussion Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act provides that the rules of a clearing agency should be designed to promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions. OCC's rules permitting allocation of clearing member positions are designed to ensure that positions are carried in the appropriate clearing member account at OCC. The new allocation service offered under Rule 405 is designed to improve upon and add efficiencies to OCC's existing CMTA functionality for allocating post-trade instructions by centralizing and further automating post-trade allocations.

Although OCC designed the new allocation system to be an improvement upon its current system, clearing members may choose to continue using the CMTA functionality. Accordingly, because the proposed rule change is designed to enhance OCC's service offerings and to provide efficiencies to clearing members, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is designed to promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions. IV. Conclusion On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and in particular with the requirements of Section 17A of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder. *It is therefore ordered,* pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, that the proposed rule change (File No.

SR-OCC-2005-22) be and hereby is approved. For the Commission by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority. 8 8 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). Nancy M. Morris, Secretary. [FR Doc. E6-3807 Filed 3-15-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8010-01-P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-53462; File No. SR-Phlx-2005-70] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating to the Deletion of Phlx Rule 454 March 9, 2006.

On November 9, 2005, the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. (“Phlx” or “Exchange”), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) a proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) 1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, 2 to delete Phlx Rule 454, “Limitations on Members” Trading Because of Options, etc.” The proposed rule change was published for comment in the **Federal Register** on February 6, 2006. 3 The Commission received no comments regarding the proposal.

This order approves the proposed rule change. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b-4. 3 * See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53188 (January 30, 2006), 71 FR 6122. The Phlx proposes to delete Phlx Rule 454, which prohibits a member, while on the floor, from initiating the purchase or sale of a security on the Exchange for the member's own account or a related account if the member or a related account holds or has granted an over-the counter option on the security. The Phlx notes that it adopted Phlx Rule 454 in 1935. 4 4 * See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 13016 (November 29, 1976), 41 FR 53383 (December 6, 1976) (order approving File No.

SR-Phlx-76-15) (amending Phlx Rule 454 to permit a Phlx member to trade an underlying security on the Phlx if the member has purchased or sold a listed option on the underlying security). After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange. 5 In particular, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, 6 which requires, among other things, that the rules of a national securities exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.

The Commission believes that the deletion of Phlx Rule 454 is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act because the Phlx now has in place comprehensive surveillance and oversight procedures designed to monitor trading in options and their underlying securities. 5 In approving this proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. *See* 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, 7 that the proposed rule change (SR-Phlx-2005-70) is approved. 7 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority. 8 8 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). Nancy M. Morris, Secretary. [FR Doc. E6-3804 Filed 3-15-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8010-01-P SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Request and Comment Request The Social Security Administration

(SSA)publishes a list of information collection packages that will require clearance by the Office of Management and Budget

(OMB)in compliance with Public Law 104-13, the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, effective October 1, 1995. The information collection packages that may be included in this notice are for new information collections, approval of existing information collections, revisions to OMB-approved information collections, and extensions (no change) of OMB-approved information collections. SSA is soliciting comments on the accuracy of the agency's burden estimate; the need for the information; its practical utility; ways to enhance its quality, utility, and clarity; and on ways to minimize burden on respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Written comments and recommendations regarding the information collection(s) should be submitted to the OMB Desk Officer and the SSA Reports Clearance Officer. The information can be mailed and/or faxed to the individuals at the addresses and fax numbers listed below:

(OMB)Office of Management and Budget, Attn: Desk Officer for SSA, Fax: 202-395-6974.

(SSA)Social Security Administration, DCFAM, Attn: Reports Clearance Officer, 1333 Annex Building, 6401 Security Blvd., Baltimore, MD 21235, Fax: 410-965-6400. I. The information collections listed below are pending at SSA and will be submitted to OMB within 60 days from the date of this notice. Therefore, your comments should be submitted to SSA within 60 days from the date of this publication. You can obtain copies of the collection instruments by calling the SSA Reports Clearance Officer at 410-965-0454 or by writing to the address listed above. 1. *Disability Report-Appeal—20 CFR 404.1512, 416.912, 404.916(c), 416.1416(c)—0960-0144* . The SSA-3441-BK is used to secure updated resource and condition information from claimants seeking reconsideration of denied disability benefits. The claimant also has the option of providing the information during a personal interview or through SSA's Internet application. This information assists the State Disability Determination Services and administrative law judges in preparing for appeals and hearings and in issuing a decision. Respondents are individuals who appeal denial of Social Security disability income and Supplemental Security Income

(SSI)benefits, cessation of benefits, or who are requesting a hearing. *Type of Request:* Extension of an OMB-approved information collection. Collection method Number of respondents Frequency of response Average burden per response (minutes) Estimated annual burden SSA-3441 (Paper Form) 404,506 1 30 202,253 Electronic Disability Collection System

(EDCS)635,873 1 30 317,937 I3441 (Internet Form) 72,341 1 60 72,341 Totals 1,112,720 592,531 *Estimated Annual Burden:* 592,531 hours. 2. *Third Party Liability Information Statement—42 CFR 433.136-433.139—0960-0323* . Identification of sources of third party insurance liable for medical care or services for Medicaid beneficiaries, which could be used to reduce Medicaid costs, is required under 42 U.S.C. 1396a(a)(25). Medicaid State agencies are mandated under 42 CFR 433.136-.139 to obtain this information on Medicaid applications and redeterminations as a condition of Medicaid eligibility. States are permitted to enter into agreements with the Commissioner of Social Security to make Medicaid eligibility determinations for aged, blind and disabled beneficiaries in those States. Applications for and redeterminations of SSI eligibility in jurisdictions with such agreements are also applications and redeterminations of Medicaid eligibility. Under these agreements, SSA obtains third party liability information using form SSA-8019 and provides that information to the State agencies which provide Medicaid under the terms of an approved plan in Title XIX of the Social Security Act. The Medicaid State agencies then use the information provided to attempt to bill any third parties liable for medical care, support or services for a beneficiary to guarantee that Medicaid remains the payer of last resort. The respondents are SSI applicants and beneficiaries. *Type of Request:* Extension of an OMB-approved information collection. *Number of Respondents:* 73,540. *Frequency of Response:* 1. *Average Burden Per Response:* 5 minutes. *Estimated Annual Burden:* 6,128 hours. II. The information collections listed below have been submitted to OMB for clearance. Your comments on the information collections would be most useful if received by OMB and SSA within 30 days from the date of this publication. You can obtain a copy of the OMB clearance packages by calling the SSA Reports Clearance Officer at 410-965-0454, or by writing to the address listed above. 1. *Report to U.S. SSA by Person Receiving Benefits for a Child or Adult Unable to Handle Funds; & Report to U.S. SSA—0960-0049.* SSA needs the information on Form SSA-7161-OCR-SM to monitor the performance of representative payees outside the U.S and the information on Form SSA-7162-OCR-SM to determine continuing entitlement to Social Security benefits and correct benefit amounts for beneficiaries outside the U.S. The respondents are individuals outside the U.S. who are receiving benefits either for someone else, or on their own behalf, under title II of the Social Security Act. *Type of Request:* Revision of an OMB-approved information collection. Form number Number of respondents Frequency of response Average burden per response (minutes) Estimated annual burden SSA-7161-OCR-SM 30,000 1 15 7,500 SSA-7162-OCR-SM 227,000 1 5 18,917 Totals 257,000 26,417 *Estimated Annual Burden:* 26,417 hours. 2. *Application for a Social Security Card—20 CFR 422.103-.110—0960-0066* . Forms SS-5 (used in the United States) and SS-5-FS (used outside the United States) are used to apply for original and replacement Social Security cards. Changes are being made to these forms to reflect new statutory limits on the number of allowable replacement cards. The respondents are requestors of new or replacement Social Security cards. Note: This Notice is for the full clearance of the collection, which received a temporary emergency clearance through April 2006. Application scenario Number of annual respondents Completion time (minutes) Burden hours Respondents who do not have to provide parents' SSNs 13,000,000 8 1/2 1,841,667 Respondents who are asked to provide parents' SSNs (for application for original SSN cards for children under age 18) 540,000 9 81,000 Applicants age 12 or older who need to answer additional questions so SSA can determine whether an SSN was previously assigned 40,000 9 1/2 6,333 Applicants asking for a replacement SSN card beyond the new allowable limits (i.e., who must provide additional documentation to accompany the application) 4,000 60 4,000 Totals 13,584,000 1,933,000 3. *Work Activity Report—Employee—20 CFR 404.1520(b), 404.1571-.1576, 404.1584-.1593, and 416.971-.976—0960-0059* . Form SSA-821-BK collects information that provides evidence necessary to determine initial or continuing eligibility for SSI or Social Security disability benefits. An individual's entitlement to benefits ends if he/she demonstrates an ability to perform substantial gainful activity (SGA). This form is used to determine whether work an individual performs in employment is at the SGA level. The respondents are Social Security disability applicants and beneficiaries and SSI applicants and recipients. *Type of Request:* Extension of an OMB-approved information collection. *Number of Respondents:* 300,000. *Frequency of Response:* 1. *Average Burden Per Response:* 45 minutes. *Estimated Annual Burden:* 225,000 hours. Dated: March 9, 2006. Elizabeth A. Davidson, Reports Clearance Officer, Social Security Administration. [FR Doc. E6-3797 Filed 3-15-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4191-02-P SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Privacy Act of 1974 as Amended; Computer Matching Program (SSA/Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the Public Debt (BPD))—Match 1304 AGENCY: Social Security Administration (SSA). ACTION: Notice of an amended computer matching program, which is expected to begin April 11, 2006. SUMMARY: In accordance with the provisions of the Privacy Act, as amended, this notice announces an amendment to the computer matching program that SSA conducts with BPD. DATES: SSA will file a report of the subject matching program with the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate; the Committee on Government Reform of the House of Representatives, and the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The matching program will be effective as indicated below. ADDRESSES: Interested parties may comment on this notice by either telefax to

(410)965-8582 or writing to the Associate Commissioner, Office of Income Security Programs, 252 Altmeyer Building, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235-6401. All comments received will be available for public inspection at this address. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Associate Commissioner for Income Security Programs as shown above. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A. General The Computer Matching and Privacy Protection Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100-503), amended the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a) by describing the manner in which computer matching involving Federal agencies could be performed and adding certain protections for individuals applying for, and receiving, Federal benefits. Section 7201 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-508) further amended the Privacy Act regarding protections for such individuals. The Privacy Act, as amended, regulates the use of computer matching by Federal agencies when records in a system of records are matched with other Federal, State, or local government records. It requires Federal agencies involved in computer matching programs to:

(1)Negotiate written agreements with the other agency or agencies participating in the matching programs;

(2)Obtain the Data Integrity Boards' approval of the match agreements;

(3)Publish notice of the computer matching program in the **Federal Register;**

(4)Furnish detailed reports about matching programs to Congress and OMB;

(5)Notify applicants and beneficiaries that their records are subject to matching; and

(6)Verify match findings before reducing, suspending, terminating, or denying an individual's benefits or payments. B. SSA Computer Matches Subject to the Privacy Act We have taken action to ensure that all of SSA's computer matching programs comply with the requirements of the Privacy Act, as amended. Dated: March 9, 2006. Martin H. Gerry, Deputy Commissioner for Disability and Income Security Programs. NOTICE OF COMPUTER MATCHING PROGRAM, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

(SSA)WITH THE BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT

(BPD)A. Participating Agencies: SSA and BPD. B. Purpose of the Matching Program: The purpose of this matching program is to establish conditions under which BPD agrees to disclose to SSA ownership of savings securities to verify an individual's self-certification of eligibility for prescription drug subsidy assistance under the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA). Pursuant to section 1860D-14 of Title I of the MMA (42 U.S.C. 1395w-114), SSA will determine whether the individual is an individual described in section 1860D-14(a) (i.e., an individual with income up to 150 percent of the Federal poverty guidelines). This agreement allows SSA to conduct the match on an annual basis. C. Authority for Conducting the Matching Program: The legal authority for SSA to conduct this matching activity is contained in section 1860D-14 (42 U.S.C. 1395w-114) of the Social Security Act. D. Categories of Records and Individuals Covered by the Matching Program: SSA will provide the BPD with a finder file containing Social Security Numbers

(SSNs)extracted from the Medicare database, as specified in this Agreement, from the Medicare file of Part D subsidy eligibles, SSA/ORSIS 09-60-0090, as published at 66 FR 11080 (February 21, 2001) and amended at 69 FR 11693 (March 11, 2004). BPD will match the SSNs on the finder file with the SSNs on its savings-type securities (Series E, EE, and I) registration systems. These records are included under the systems of records Treasury/BPD.002, United States Savings Type Securities, and Treasury/BPD.008, Retail Treasury Securities Access Application, last published on May 22, 2001 at 66 FR 28225 and 28235, respectively. SSA will then match BPD data with the Medicare Part D and Part D Subsidy File System of Record 60-0321. E. Inclusive Dates of the Matching Program: The matching program will become effective no sooner than 40 days after notice of the matching program is sent to Congress and OMB, or 30 days after publication of this notice in the **Federal Register** , whichever date is later. The matching program will continue for 18 months from the effective date and may be extended for an additional 12 months thereafter, if certain conditions are met. [FR Doc. E6-3794 Filed 3-15-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4191-02-P SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Privacy Act of 1974, as Amended; Computer Matching Program (SSA/Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

(CMS)Match Number 1076) AGENCY: Social Security Administration (SSA). ACTION: Notice of renewal of an existing computer matching program which is scheduled to expire on April 17, 2006. SUMMARY: In accordance with the provisions of the Privacy Act, as amended, this notice announces the renewal of an existing computer matching program that SSA is currently conducting with CMS. DATES: SSA will file a report of the subject matching program with the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate, the Committee on Government Reform of the House of Representatives and the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The renewal of the matching program will be effective as indicated below. ADDRESSES: Interested parties may comment on this notice by either telefax to

(410)965-8582 or writing to the Associate Commissioner for Income Security Programs, 245 Altmeyer Building, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235-6401. All comments received will be available for public inspection at this address. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Associate Commissioner for Income Security Programs as shown above. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A. General The Computer Matching and Privacy Protection Act of 1988 (Pub L. 100-503) amended the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a) by establishing the conditions under which computer matching involving the Federal government could be performed and adding certain protections for individuals applying for, and receiving, Federal benefits. Section 7201 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-508) further amended the Privacy Act regarding protections for such individuals. The Privacy Act, as amended, regulates the use of computer matching by Federal agencies when records in a system of records are matched with other Federal, state, or local government records. It requires Federal agencies involved in computer matching programs to:

(1)Negotiate written agreements with the other agency or agencies participating in the matching programs;

(2)Obtain the Data Integrity Boards' approval of the match agreements;

(3)Publish notice of the computer matching program in the **Federal Register** ;

(4)Furnish detailed reports about matching programs to Congress and OMB;

(5)Notify applicants and beneficiaries that their records are subject to matching; and

(6)Verify match findings before reducing, suspending, terminating, or denying an individual's benefits or payments. B. SSA Computer Matches Subject to the Privacy Act We have taken action to ensure that all of SSA's computer matching programs comply with the requirements of the Privacy Act, as amended. Dated: March 8, 2006. Martin H. Gerry, Deputy Commissioner for Disability and Income Security Programs. NOTICE OF COMPUTER MATCHING PROGRAM, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

(SSA)WITH THE CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES

(CMS)A. Participating Agencies SSA and CMS. B. Purpose of the Matching Program The purpose of this matching program is to identify Supplemental Security Income

(SSI)recipients and Special Veterans' Benefits

(SVB)beneficiaries who have been admitted to certain public institutions. The program will thereby facilitate benefit reductions required under certain provisions of title XVI of the Social Security Act (the Act) for individuals in such institutions and benefit terminations required under certain provisions of title VIII of the Act for individuals no longer residing outside the United States. C. Authority for Conducting the Matching Program) Sections 1611(e)(1)(A) and (B), 1631(f), 801 and 806(a) and

(b)of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1382(e)(1)(A) and (B), 1383(f), 1001 and 1006(a) and (b)); 20 CFR 416.211. Routine Use Number 19, effective 1/6/95, allows disclosure to Federal, state or local agencies for administering cash or non-cash income maintenance or health maintenance programs. D. Categories of Records and Individuals Covered by the Matching Program On the basis of certain identifying information regarding SSI and SVB applicants, recipients, and beneficiaries, as provided by SSA to CMS, CMS will provide SSA with electronic files containing skilled nursing facility admission and billing data from its Long-Term Care Minimum Data Set, LTC/MDS 09-70-1516, system of records. SSA will then match the CMS data with SSI and SVB payment information maintained in the Supplemental Security Income Record and Special Veterans Benefits, SSA/ODSSIS 60-0103, system of records. E. Inclusive Dates of the Matching Program The matching program shall become effective no sooner than 40 days after notice for the program is sent to Congress and OMB, or 30 days after publication of this notice in the **Federal Register** , whichever date is later. The matching program will continue for 18 months from the effective date and may be extended for an additional 12 months thereafter, if certain conditions are met. [FR Doc. E6-3796 Filed 3-15-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4191-02-P DEPARTMENT OF STATE [Public Notice 5344] Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs

(ECA)Request for Grant Proposals: Benjamin Franklin Transatlantic Fellows Initiative: Summer Institute for Youth *Announcement Type:* New Grant. *Funding Opportunity Number:* ECA/PE/C/PY-06-49. *Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number:* 00.000. DATES: *Key Dates: Application Deadline:* April 27, 2006. *Executive Summary:* The Office of Citizen Exchanges, Youth Programs Division, of the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs

(ECA)announces an open competition for the Summer Institute for Youth, a project under the Benjamin Franklin Transatlantic Fellows Initiative. Public and private non-profit organizations meeting the provisions described in Internal Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3), including accredited, post-secondary U.S. educational institutions, may submit proposals to provide a three-week U.S.-based institute in the summer of 2006 for up to 40 teenagers aged 16-19 from Europe, Eurasia, and the United States focused on civic education, leadership development, and community activism as a way to unite young adults across the Atlantic Ocean. Please note: Funding for this program will be provided from FREEDOM Support and SEED Act transfers. This program will be funded pending the successful transfer of funds to ECA. I. Funding Opportunity Description *Authority:* Overall grant making authority for this program is contained in the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, Public Law 87-256, as amended, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of the Act is “to enable the Government of the United States to increase mutual understanding between the people of the United States and the people of other countries * * *; to strengthen the ties which unite us with other nations by demonstrating the educational and cultural interests, developments, and achievements of the people of the United States and other nations * * * and thus to assist in the development of friendly, sympathetic and peaceful relations between the United States and the other countries of the world.” The funding authority for the program is provided through the Support for East European Democracy

(SEED)Act

(1989)and the FREEDOM Support Act

(FSA)legislation of 1992. *Overview:* The Benjamin Franklin Transatlantic Fellows Initiative aims to foster relationships among the younger generation of Europeans and Americans in order to advance the global freedom agenda, to serve as a basis to build strong links and awareness of shared values, and to enable youth to face together the challenges of global circumstances in the 21st Century. The initiative is named after the legendary American statesman and diplomat in honor of the inspiration his own life and career provides those who want to increase transatlantic cooperation. The Benjamin Franklin Transatlantic Fellows Initiative: Summer Institute for Youth will enable teenagers (ages 16-19) to participate in an intensive, three-week exchange program in the United States that focuses on the global issues that European and American youth face on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean. Participants will be engaged in a variety of activities such as training sessions, workshops, community and/or school-based programs, and cultural events. Participants will work together to prepare a joint project that presents and promotes the Institute's stated goals and objectives. *Goals:* The goals of the Transatlantic Fellows Program are

(1)to develop a sense of civic responsibility and a commitment to transatlantic cooperation among youth;

(2)to foster relationships among youth from different ethnic, religious, and national groups;

(3)to promote mutual understanding between the United States and Europe/Eurasia; and

(4)to develop a cadre of youth leaders who will share their knowledge and skills with their peers through positive action. With the specific focus of this Institute, the following outcomes will indicate a successful project: • Participants will work together to identify and overcome misunderstanding or lack of understanding among nations both during the Institute and after they return to their homes. • Participants will develop critical thinking skills that will enable them to judge how effectively various media convey factual information to present accurate images of diverse cultures. • Participants will demonstrate a better understanding of U.S.-Europe relations and issues. • Participants will gain an understanding of the roles of the media and public perceptions in diplomacy. *Theme:* In today's terms, Benjamin Franklin could be called a transatlantic man, someone whose career, interests, studies and life took him back and forth across the Atlantic Ocean, bringing Americans and Europeans closer in understanding. His life offers inspiration to young citizens of today in the effort to bridge the Atlantic, even 300 years later. As a diplomat and a printer, he leveraged the power of diplomacy and of the media to explore how Americans and Europeans see each other. This summer Institute will guide the participants to examine what Americans and Europeans need to know about each other to better communicate person to person, and to face the many challenges of the 21st Century together. The Institute will also explore how young people interact with media, both as consumers and producers of information, and how freedom of expression imposes both rights and responsibilities on citizens. Increasingly young people have come to rely upon mass communication—the use of words, sounds, and images by a few to inform, educate, entertain and persuade the many—to learn about the world they inhabit. Mass media not only supplies factual information, it also expresses cultural preferences, promotes value systems, and fuels commerce through advertising and product placement. The program should provide the participants with a new perspective on their learning, networking, U.S.-Europe perceptions of each other, the communities they live in, and the broader media culture. *Who:* The participants will be up to 40 students ages 16-19 from Europe, Eurasia, and the United States. One or two students will come from each participating country, except for the United States, which will have up to ten representatives. We expect that eight participants will represent SEED countries and 12 will represent FSA countries (see POGI for lists). U.S. Embassies will screen and select the overseas participants from a pool of students with whom they have contact. All countries of Europe and Eurasia will be eligible to nominate participants; the State Department will be responsible for the final selection of participants and the countries they will represent. U.S. Embassies will arrange and pay for the Europeans' international travel to and from the United States (see details in the POGI). The grant recipient will be responsible for recruiting and selecting the U.S. participants. All students must be able to participate fully in English. The grant recipient should also arrange for highly qualified mentors at a ratio of six students to one mentor. Mentors may serve as trainers as appropriate. The delegation should have an adult accompany them on transatlantic flights, and adult staff should be available to support the participants during the course of the Institute. *When:* Applicants should propose a three-week U.S. institute that will take place between June and August 2006. *Where:* The Institute will take place on a U.S. university or college campus or at a similar venue. Ideally, the venue selected will be on or near a campus with a European Studies center. Students will be housed together at a dormitory on campus, as staying together will facilitate regional cooperation on the project and training. The Bureau strongly encourages weekend homestays or home hospitality to ensure that participants get a taste of typical American family life. A study trip should be planned to Philadelphia to visit key Benjamin Franklin commemorative sites and events. See the Benjamin Franklin Tercentenary Web site: *http://www.benfranklin300.org* The Institute may take place in one or two communities (including or in addition to the Philadelphia study trip) and should offer the participants exposure to the variety of American life. *What:* The program should focus primarily on the exploration of global issues through interactive activities, practical experiences, and other hands-on opportunities, through which the participants will learn more about democratic practices, volunteer service, conflict resolution, critical thinking, tolerance and respect for diversity, and youth leadership. All programming should include additional American participants wherever possible. Cultural and recreational activities will balance the schedule. A. Training and Joint Project Before and during the Institute, students will gather information on Americans' views of Europeans and on Europeans' views of the United States about one or two areas of common or global interest, such as sustainable development, inter-ethnic cooperation, or world poverty. They will also identify and address stereotypes they hold of others. The students will gather information via the Internet and various forms of the media, through interviews with ordinary citizens and experts—including academics and diplomats—and by other methods, such as designing and conducting a survey. Students will focus on attitudes of their contemporaries and those closely linked, such as teachers or family members. Training will focus on developing a critical reading of printed, broadcast, and electronic media. The students should increase their awareness of the levels of communication in news and popular media, to be able to judge the content and accuracy for themselves. The objective of this training is to enable them to gather the information needed to create the materials for the project described below. Training will cover communication skills, problem solving, and team building. Finally, students will design simple educational materials, an outreach campaign, a newsletter, or another type of project (for example, an Internet based project linking selected American and European schools/students with each other). B. Community Service The participants will take part in at least one community service activity during the U.S. program to demonstrate American volunteerism. The program should provide context for the participants to undertake the service activity—identifying community needs, the nature of volunteerism, charitable giving, etc.—and a debriefing so that the service activity is not an isolated event and to help participants see how they could apply the experience at home. In addition to this community service, the participants reach out to American youth by presenting and testing the educational materials described above to young American audiences, such as students in summer school or in another organized summer activity. Upon their return home, European participants will develop, test, and present the materials with young audiences in their home countries. Applicant organizations must demonstrate their capacity for doing projects of this nature, focusing on three areas of competency:

(1)Provision of programs that address the goals and themes outlined in this document;

(2)age-appropriate programming for youth; and

(3)previous experience in working in Europe and/or Eurasia. Applicant organizations should be able to help U.S. embassies support follow-on activities for the alumni of the U.S.-based Institute. The Bureau reserves the right to reduce, revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of the program and the availability of funds. The Bureau also reserves the right to renew this grant in future years contingent upon the successful performance of the grant recipient and the availability of funding. *Guidelines:* Pending the transfer and availability of funds, the grant will begin on or about June 5, 2006. The grant period will be 10 to 12 months in duration, as appropriate. The grant recipient will be responsible for the following: • Recruitment, screening, and selection of American participants. • Designing and planning of activities in the United States that provide a substantive program that promotes transatlantic dialogue, critical thinking, democracy and tolerance, media analysis, leadership development, civic education, and community service. Some activities should be school and/or community-based, as feasible, and the projects will involve as much interaction with American peers, even beyond those directly participating in the Institute, as possible. • Logistical arrangements, home-stay arrangements (as appropriate) and/or other accommodation, disbursement of stipends/per diem, local travel, and travel between sites. • Follow-on activities in the participants' home countries designed to reinforce the ideas, values, and skills imparted during the U.S. program. Proposals must demonstrate how the stated objectives will be met. The proposal narrative should provide detailed information on the major program activities, and applicants should explain and justify their programmatic choices. Programs must comply with J-1 visa regulations for the International Visitor category. Please be sure to refer to the complete Solicitation Package—this RFGP, the Project Objectives, Goals, and Implementation (POGI), and the Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)—for further information. II. Award Information *Type of Award:* Grant Agreement. *Fiscal Year Funds:* 2006. *Approximate Total Funding:* $171,750. *Approximate Number of Awards:* One. *Anticipated Award Date:* June 5, 2006. (Pending the transfer of funds to ECA). *Anticipated Project Completion Date:* 10-12 months after start date, to be specified by applicant based on project plan. III. Eligibility Information III.1. *Eligible applicants:* Applications may be submitted by public and private non-profit organizations meeting the provisions described in Internal Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3). III.2. *Cost Sharing or Matching Funds:* There is no minimum or maximum percentage required for this competition. However, the Bureau encourages applicants to provide maximum levels of cost sharing and funding in support of its programs. When cost sharing is offered, it is understood and agreed that the applicant must provide the amount of cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal and later included in an approved grant agreement. Cost sharing may be in the form of allowable direct or indirect costs. For accountability, you must maintain written records to support all costs that are claimed as your contribution, as well as costs to be paid by the Federal government. Such records are subject to audit. The basis for determining the value of cash and in-kind contributions must be in accordance with OMB Circular A-110, (Revised), Subpart C.23—Cost Sharing and Matching. In the event you do not provide the minimum amount of cost sharing as stipulated in the approved budget, ECA's contribution will be reduced in like proportion. III.3. *Other Eligibility Requirements:* (a.) Bureau grant guidelines require that organizations with less than four years experience in conducting international exchanges be limited to $60,000 in Bureau funding. ECA anticipates awarding a grant in an amount over $60,000 to support program and administrative costs required to implement this exchange program. Therefore, organizations with less than four years experience in conducting international exchanges are ineligible to apply under this competition. The Bureau encourages applicants to provide maximum levels of cost sharing and funding in support of its programs. IV. Application and Submission Information Note: Please read the complete announcement before sending inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with applicants until the proposal review process has been completed. IV.1. *Contact Information to Request an Application Package:* Please contact the Youth Programs Division (ECA/PE/C/PY), Room 568, U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547, Telephone

(202)203-7505, Fax

(202)203-7529, E-mail: *LantzCS@state.gov* to request a Solicitation Package. Please refer to the Funding Opportunity Number (ECA/PE/C/PY-06-49) located at the top of this announcement when making your request. Alternatively, an electronic application package may be obtained from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f for further information. The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission Instruction

(PSI)document, which consists of required application forms and standard guidelines for proposal preparation. It also contains the Project Objectives, Goals and Implementation

(POGI)document, which provides specific information, award criteria, and budget instructions tailored to this competition. Please specify Bureau Program Officer Carolyn Lantz and refer to the Funding Opportunity Number located at the top of this announcement on all other inquiries and correspondence. IV.2. *To Download a Solicitation Package Via Internet:* The entire Solicitation Package may be downloaded from the Bureau's Web site at *http://exchanges.state.gov/education/rfgps/menu.htm,* or from the Grants.gov Web site at *http://www.grants.gov.* Please read all information before downloading. IV.3. *Content and Form of Submission:* Applicants must follow all instructions in the Solicitation Package. The application should be submitted per the instructions under IV.3f. “Submission Dates and Times section” below. IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering System

(DUNS)number to apply for a grant or cooperative agreement from the U.S. Government. This number is a nine-digit identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities. Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a DUNS number, access *http://www.dunandbradstreet.com* or call 1-866-705-5711. Please ensure that your DUNS number is included in the appropriate box of the SF-424 form that is part of the formal application package. IV.3b. All proposals must contain an executive summary, proposal narrative and budget. Please Refer to the Solicitation Package. It contains the mandatory Proposal Submission Instructions

(PSI)document and the Project Objectives, Goals and Implementation

(POGI)document for additional formatting and technical requirements. IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status with the IRS at the time of application. If your organization is a private nonprofit which has not received a grant or cooperative agreement from ECA in the past three years, or if your organization received nonprofit status from the IRS within the past four years, you must submit the necessary documentation to verify nonprofit status as directed in the PSI document. Failure to do so will cause your proposal to be declared technically ineligible. IV.3d. Please take into consideration the following information when preparing your proposal narrative: IV.3d.1. *Adherence to All Regulations Governing the J Visa:* The Office of Citizen Exchanges of the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs is the official program sponsor of the exchange program covered by this RFGP, and an employee of the Bureau will be the “Responsible Officer” for the program under the terms of 22 CFR part 62, which covers the administration of the Exchange Visitor Program (J visa program). Under the terms of 22 CFR part 62, organizations receiving grants under this RFGP will be third parties “cooperating with or assisting the sponsor in the conduct of the sponsor's program.” The actions of grantee program organizations shall be “imputed to the sponsor in evaluating the sponsor's compliance with” 22 CFR part 62. Therefore, the Bureau expects that any organization receiving a grant under this competition will render all assistance necessary to enable the Bureau to fully comply with 22 CFR part 62 *et seq* . The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs places great emphasis on the secure and proper administration of Exchange Visitor (J visa) Programs and adherence by grantee program organizations and program participants to all regulations governing the J visa program status. Therefore, proposals should explicitly state in writing that the applicant is prepared to assist the Bureau in meeting all requirements governing the administration of Exchange Visitor Programs as set forth in 22 CFR part 62. If your organization has experience as a designated Exchange Visitor Program Sponsor, the applicant should discuss their record of compliance with 22 CFR part 62 *et seq* ., including the oversight of their Responsible Officers and Alternate Responsible Officers, screening and selection of program participants, provision of pre-arrival information and orientation to participants, monitoring of participants, proper maintenance and security of forms, recordkeeping, reporting and other requirements. The Office of Citizen Exchanges of ECA will be responsible for issuing DS- 2019 forms to participants in this program. A copy of the complete regulations governing the administration of Exchange Visitor

(J)programs is available at *http://exchanges.state.gov* or from: United States Department of State, Office of Exchange Coordination and Designation, ECA/EC/ECD—SA-44, Room 734, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547. Telephone:

(202)203-5029. Fax:

(202)453-8640. IV.3d.2. *Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines:* Pursuant to the Bureau's authorizing legislation, programs must maintain a non-political character and should be balanced and representative of the diversity of American political, social, and cultural life. “Diversity” should be interpreted in the broadest sense and encompass differences including, but not limited to ethnicity, race, gender, religion, geographic location, socio-economic status, and physical challenges. Applicants are strongly encouraged to adhere to the advancement of this principle both in program administration and in program content. Please refer to the review criteria under the ‘Support for Diversity’ section for specific suggestions on incorporating diversity into your proposal. Public Law 104-319 provides that “in carrying out programs of educational and cultural exchange in countries whose people do not fully enjoy freedom and democracy,” the Bureau “shall take appropriate steps to provide opportunities for participation in such programs to human rights and democracy leaders of such countries.” Public Law 106-113 requires that the governments of the countries described above do not have inappropriate influence in the selection process. Proposals should reflect advancement of these goals in their program contents, to the full extent deemed feasible. IV.3d.3. *Program Monitoring and Evaluation:* Proposals must include a plan to monitor and evaluate the project's success, both as the activities unfold and at the end of the program. The Bureau recommends that your proposal include a draft survey questionnaire or other technique plus a description of a methodology to use to link outcomes to original project objectives. The Bureau expects that the grantee will track participants or partners and be able to respond to key evaluation questions, including satisfaction with the program, learning as a result of the program, changes in behavior as a result of the program, and effects of the program on institutions (institutions in which participants work or partner institutions). The evaluation plan should include indicators that measure gains in mutual understanding as well as substantive knowledge. Successful monitoring and evaluation depend heavily on setting clear goals and outcomes at the outset of a program. Your evaluation plan should include a description of your project's objectives, your anticipated project outcomes, and how and when you intend to measure these outcomes (performance indicators). The more that outcomes are “smart” (specific, measurable, attainable, results-oriented, and placed in a reasonable time frame), the easier it will be to conduct the evaluation. You should also show how your project objectives link to the goals of the program described in this RFGP. Your monitoring and evaluation plan should clearly distinguish between program *outputs* and *outcomes. Outputs* are products and services delivered, often stated as an amount. Output information is important to show the scope or size of project activities, but it cannot substitute for information about progress towards outcomes or the results achieved. Examples of outputs include the number of people trained or the number of seminars conducted. *Outcomes,* in contrast, represent specific results a project is intended to achieve and is usually measured as an extent of change. Findings on outputs and outcomes should both be reported, but the focus should be on outcomes. We encourage you to assess the following four levels of outcomes, as they relate to the program goals set out in the RFGP (listed here in increasing order of importance): 1. Participant satisfaction with the program and exchange experience. 2. Participant learning, such as increased knowledge, aptitude, skills, and changed understanding and attitude. Learning includes both substantive (subject-specific) learning and mutual understanding. 3. Participant behavior, concrete actions to apply knowledge in work or community; greater participation and responsibility in civic organizations; interpretation and explanation of experiences and new knowledge gained; continued contacts between participants, community members, and others. 4. Institutional changes, such as increased collaboration and partnerships, policy reforms, new programming, and organizational improvements. Please note: Consideration should be given to the appropriate timing of data collection for each level of outcome. For example, satisfaction is usually captured as a short-term outcome, whereas behavior and institutional changes are normally considered longer-term outcomes. Overall, the quality of your monitoring and evaluation plan will be judged on how well it

(1)specifies intended outcomes;

(2)gives clear descriptions of how each outcome will be measured;

(3)identifies when particular outcomes will be measured; and

(1)In hard-copy, via a nationally recognized overnight delivery service (i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS, Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal Service Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or

(2)Electronically through *http://www.grants.gov* . Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory Proposal Submission Instructions

(PSI)of the solicitation document. IV.3f.1 *Submitting Printed Applications:* Applications must be shipped no later than the above deadline. Delivery services used by applicants must have in-place, centralized shipping identification and tracking systems that may be accessed via the Internet and delivery people who are identifiable by commonly recognized uniforms and delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before the above deadline but received at ECA more than seven days after the deadline will be ineligible for further consideration under this competition. Proposals shipped after the established deadlines are ineligible for consideration under this competition. ECA will not notify you upon receipt of application. It is each applicant's responsibility to ensure that each package is marked with a legible tracking number and to monitor/confirm delivery to ECA via the Internet. Delivery of proposal packages may not be made via local courier service or in person for this competition. Faxed documents will not be accepted at any time. Only proposals submitted as stated above will be considered. Important note: When preparing your submission please make sure to include one extra copy of the completed SF-424 form and place it in an envelope addressed to “ECA/EX/PM”. The original, one fully-tabbed copy, and six copies of the application with Tabs A-E (for a total of 8 copies) should be sent to: U.S. Department of State, SA-44, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Ref.: ECA/PE/C/PY-06-49, Program Management, ECA/EX/PM, Room 534, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547. Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory Proposal Submission Instructions

(PSI)of the solicitation document. Applicants must also submit the executive summary, proposal narrative, budget section, and any important appendices as e-mail attachments in Microsoft Word and Excel to the following e-mail address: *LantzCS@state.gov* . In the e-mail message subject line, include the name of the applicant organization and the partner country. The Bureau will transmit these files electronically to the Public Affairs Sections of the relevant U.S. Embassies for review. IV.3f.2 *Submitting Electronic Applications* : Applicants have the option of submitting proposals electronically through Grants.gov ( *http://www.grants.gov* ). Complete solicitation packages are available at Grants.gov in the “Find” portion of the system. Please follow the instructions available in the ‘Get Started’ portion of the site ( *http://www.grants.gov/GetStarted* ). Applicants have until midnight (12 a.m.) of the closing date to ensure that their entire applications have been uploaded to the grants.gov site. Applications uploaded to the site after midnight of the application deadline date will be automatically rejected by the grants.gov system, and will be technically ineligible. Applicants will receive a confirmation e-mail from grants.gov upon the successful submission of an application. ECA will not notify you upon receipt of electronic applications. IV.3g. *Intergovernmental Review of Applications:* Executive Order 12372 does not apply to this program. V. Application Review Information V.1. Review Process The Bureau will review all proposals for technical eligibility. Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they do not fully adhere to the guidelines stated herein and in the Solicitation Package. All eligible proposals will be reviewed by the program office, as well as the Public Diplomacy section overseas, where appropriate. Eligible proposals will be subject to compliance with Federal and Bureau regulations and guidelines and forwarded to Bureau grant panels for advisory review. Proposals may also be reviewed by the Office of the Legal Adviser or by other Department elements. Final funding decisions are at the discretion of the Department of State's Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final technical authority for assistance awards (grants) resides with the Bureau's Grants Officer. Review Criteria Please see the review criteria in the accompanying Project Objectives, Goals, and Implementation

(POGI)document. VI. Award Administration Information VI.1a. *Award Notices:* Final awards cannot be made until funds have been appropriated by Congress, allocated and committed through internal Bureau procedures. Successful applicants will receive an Assistance Award Document

(AAD)from the Bureau's Grants Office. The AAD and the original grant proposal with subsequent modifications (if applicable) shall be the only binding authorizing document between the recipient and the U.S. Government. The AAD will be signed by an authorized Grants Officer, and mailed to the recipient's responsible officer identified in the application. Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification of the results of the application review from the ECA program office coordinating this competition. VI.2 *Administrative and National Policy Requirements:* Terms and Conditions for the Administration of ECA agreements include the following: Office of Management and Budget Circular A-122, “Cost Principles for Nonprofit Organizations.” Office of Management and Budget Circular A-21, “Cost Principles for Educational Institutions.” OMB Circular A-87, “Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian Governments”. OMB Circular No. A-110 (Revised), Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and other Nonprofit Organizations. OMB Circular No. A-102, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants-in-Aid to State and Local Governments. OMB Circular No. A-133, Audits of States, Local Government, and Non-profit Organizations. Please reference the following Web sites for additional information: *http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants.* *http://exchanges.state.gov/education/grantsdiv/terms.htm#articleI.* VI.3. *Reporting Requirements:* You must provide ECA with a hard copy original plus one copy of the following reports: A final program and financial report no more than 90 days after the expiration of the award; Interim reports, as required in the Bureau grant agreement. Grantees will be required to provide reports analyzing their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program reports. (Please refer to IV. Application and Submission Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program Monitoring and Evaluation information. All data collected, including survey responses and contact information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years and provided to the Bureau upon request. All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer listed in the final assistance award document. VI.4. *Program Data Requirements:* Organizations awarded grants will be required to maintain specific data on program participants and activities in an electronically accessible database format that can be shared with the Bureau as required. As a minimum, the data must include the following:

(1)Name, address, contact information and biographic sketch of all persons who travel internationally on funds provided by the grant or who benefit from the grant funding but do not travel.

(2)Itineraries of international and domestic travel, providing dates of travel and cities in which any exchange experiences take place. Final schedules for in-country and U.S. activities must be received by the ECA Program Officer at least three workdays prior to the official opening of the activity. VII. Agency Contacts For questions about this announcement, contact: Carolyn Lantz, Program Officer, Youth Programs Division (ECA/PE/C/PY), Room 568, U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547, Telephone

(202)203-7505, Fax

(202)203-7529, E-mail: *LantzCS@state.gov.* All correspondence with the Bureau concerning this RFGP should reference the above title and number ECA/PE/C/PY-06-49. Please read the complete announcement before sending inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with applicants until the proposal review process has been completed. VIII. Other Information *Notice:* The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding and may not be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory information provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language will not be binding. Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an award commitment on the part of the Government. The Bureau reserves the right to reduce, revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be subject to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section VI.3 above. Dated: March 10, 2006. C. Miller Crouch, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. [FR Doc. E6-3835 Filed 3-15-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4710-05-P DEPARTMENT OF STATE [Public Notice 5343] Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs

(ECA)Request for Grant Proposals: Youth Leadership Program on Free Expression *Announcement Type:* New Grant. *Funding Opportunity Number:* ECA/PE/C/PY-06-22. *Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number:* 00.000. *Key Dates:* It is anticipated that the grant period would run approximately from Summer 2006 to Summer 2007, with two iterations of the U.S. project taking place in Fall 2006 and Spring 2007. Each U.S. project will be four weeks in length. *Application Deadline:* May 8, 2006. *Executive Summary:* The Office of Citizen Exchanges, Youth Programs Division, of the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs

(ECA)announces an open competition for the Youth Leadership Program on Free Expression. Public and private non-profit organizations meeting the provisions described in Internal Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3) may submit proposals to recruit and select youth and adult participants overseas and to provide the participants with two U.S.-based exchange projects on the first amendment with a focus on free expression. The core of the Youth Leadership Program on Free Expression is a twelve-day International Free Expression Institute funded and provided by the Freedom Forum and the Close Up Foundation, with which the grantee organization must partner on this program. I. Funding Opportunity Description Authority Overall grant making authority for this program is contained in the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, Public Law 87-256, as amended, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of the Act is “to enable the Government of the United States to increase mutual understanding between the people of the United States and the people of other countries * * *; to strengthen the ties which unite us with other nations by demonstrating the educational and cultural interests, developments, and achievements of the people of the United States and other nations * * * and thus to assist in the development of friendly, sympathetic and peaceful relations between the United States and the other countries of the world.” The funding authority for the program above is provided through legislation. Program Information *Overview:* The Youth Leadership Program on Free Expression enables youth (aged 15-18 with at least one year of high school remaining following the program), and adult educators/community leaders to participate in an intensive, thematic, month-long multi-regional project in the United States that will educate highly motivated international students and adults about the value of first amendment ideals and the importance of a free press and free expression in the development of democracies throughout the world. The 50 participants will be recruited from 3-5 countries in at least three of the following world regions: Central and South America, sub-Saharan Africa, Middle East and North Africa, South and Central Asia, the Caucasus, and Southeast Asia. Participants will travel in two groups of 25 to allow for more personalized programming. Participants will be engaged in a variety of activities such as workshops, community and/or school-based programs, cultural activities, seminars and other activities designed to achieve the project's stated goals and objectives. Opportunities for participants to interact with American youth and adult educators and community leaders will be included as much as possible. The core of the Youth Leadership Program on Free Expression is the twelve-day International Free Expression Institute provided by the Freedom Forum and the Close Up Foundation, with which the grantee organization must partner on this program. This Institute is designed to teach the principles inherent in the first amendment of the U.S. Constitution, their values in society, and their application in a variety of settings. The Institute will take place in the Washington, DC area. Applicants must contact Tim Hair, the point person for the Institute, (phone:

(703)706-3491 or e-mail: *hairt@closeup.org* ) for additional information. The goals of the Youth Leadership Program on Free Expression are:

(1)To create a cadre of active and informed youth in emerging civil societies who are capable of making meaningful contributions to democratic processes. These young people will understand and embrace the value of first amendment ideals, will affect public debate and be civically engaged, and will be part of an international network of youth activists;

(2)To foster relationships among youth from different ethnic, religious, and national groups; and

(3)To promote mutual understanding between the United States and people of other countries. Applicants should identify their own specific objectives and measurable outcomes based on these program goals and the project specifications provided in this solicitation. Applicants must demonstrate their capacity for conducting programs of this nature, focusing on three areas of competency:

(1)Provision of programs aimed at achieving the goals and themes outlined in this document;

(2)age-appropriate programming for youth; and

(3)previous experience in working with the proposed countries. Applicants need to have the necessary capacity in the geographic areas from which participants will be recruited or a partner institution with the requisite capacity to recruit and select participants for the program and to provide post-exchange follow-on activities. *Program Content:* The Youth Leadership Program on Free Expression has two key components:

(1)The twelve-day International Free Expression Institute in Washington, DC, provided and funded by the Freedom Forum and the Close Up Foundation followed by

(2)a homestay and practicum in another locale to be organized by the grantee organization. A team of Freedom Forum and Close Up educational specialists will develop an experiential and interactive curriculum for content-based seminars and workshops upon which the International Free Expression Institute in Washington, DC will be based. Participants will have a variety of experiential learning components including seminars and workshops conducted by First Amendment scholars, interactive discussions with Washington press corps, Members of Congress and policy-makers and onsite visits to newsrooms, Capitol Hill and think tanks. The adults will have some separate sessions designed specifically for them as educators. Program activities may include overnight visits to Williamsburg or Philadelphia. The Close Up Foundation will provide administration, logistics, and curriculum development, and will be responsible for monitoring the students and organizing the “DC as a classroom” sessions during the Institute. The Mission Statement for the International Freedom Expression Institute provided by the Freedom Forum and the Close Up Foundation and descriptions of these organizations follow. “The Freedom Forum's Diversity Institute is expanding its mission to educate current and future international leaders about the central role of free expression in a democratic society. The fundamentals of free expression are found in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly and petition. These freedoms are not “American” rights; they are universal human rights as set forth in the Universal Declaration of Rights. They are not privileges granted by governments, but rather fundamental liberties founded on the inviolable dignity of the person. The Diversity Institute will teach the importance of free and diverse expression through a curriculum that encourages open and robust dialogue among people of many nationalities, cultures, races, religions and ethnicities. The curriculum will focus on the five freedoms as humanity's “first freedoms,” the means by which people throughout the world seek to follow the dictates of conscience, speak out for justice, disseminate knowledge and organize for change. Through the lessons of history in the United States and other nations, the curriculum explores the advances and setbacks in the ongoing struggle to secure these basic rights. Special emphasis is placed on learning about the role of a free press in upholding all other freedoms by ensuring a marketplace of ideas free from government control. In emerging democracies throughout the world—as in the American experience—these five rights have been both the means for winning freedom and the essential framework for ordering freedom once freedom is won. Graduates of the program will understand that universal rights are accompanied by a universal duty to exercise those rights in ways that advance the cause of democratic freedom for all people.” Program Partners The Close Up Foundation The Close Up Foundation is the nation's largest nonprofit (501(c)(3)), nonpartisan citizenship education organization. Since its founding in 1970, Close Up has worked to promote responsible and informed participation in the democratic process through a variety of educational programs. Each year, more than 20,000 students, teachers, and other adults take part in Close Up's programs in Washington, DC. Since the inception of its Washington-based programs in 1971, the Close Up Foundation has welcomed nearly 650,000 students, educators, and other adults to the nation's capital. ( *http://www.closeup.org/* ). The Freedom Forum The Freedom Forum is a non-partisan foundation dedicated to free press, free speech and free spirit. The Freedom Forum's Diversity Institute is a school with a mission to teach about diversity of thought, expression and free press. The Diversity Institute's International Free Expression Institute teaches current and future international leaders about the basics of free expression in a democratic society. ( *http://www.freedomforum.org/* ). The second component, designed by the grant applicant, will allow the participants to apply what they have learned in the Institute by visiting a community elsewhere in the United States, either as one large group or divided into sub-groups. The students should work with local youth in the practical implementation of the first amendment ideals and ethics by working with newspapers, radio, or television stations based in schools, or communities and oriented toward youth, such as First Amendment Schools ( *http://www.firstamendmentschools.org/* ). The participants may also take part in youth activist groups. Other possibilities include the staging of a mock trial or a debate on an issue involving free speech or freedom of religion. This segment of the program should include homestays with local families. The Freedom Forum has offered to provide consultation on possible host communities based on its knowledge of schools with strong journalism programs. The program should be designed to capitalize on group learning opportunities, providing participants numerous occasions to share their experiences and learn more about each other's cultures, allowing them to gain a better appreciation of each other and enabling them to develop their teambuilding skills. The program should also provide ample opportunities for the participants to interact with their American peers. Participants are expected to apply their newfound knowledge and skills in developing a project plan for implementation upon their return home. At the end of the program, the participants should receive a certificate of completion. Guidelines In pursuit of the goals outlined above, the program will include the following: • Recruitment and selection of youth and adult educators/community leaders from the appropriate geographic regions (see below). Facilitating their travel to the U.S. • Designing and implementing a pre-departure orientation program. Participants will have a pre-program orientation that emphasizes the goals of the program and prepares them for the activities ahead. The orientation should include a general overview of the cultures and countries participating in this program, and provide logistical and travel information. An arrival orientation should be conducted in partnership with Freedom Forum and Close Up representatives the day before the Institute begins as well as a review session the day following the Institute's conclusion. An online tool for communication such as a listserv, bulletin board, blog, or Web site can serve as a source of information and a venue for participants to interact with each other prior to, during, and after their exchange. Another possibility for communication is via the Department of State's Alumni Web site ( *https://alumni.state.gov/* ). • Working in cooperation with the Freedom Forum and Close Up Foundation, designing and planning of activities that provide a substantive program on first amendment ideals with an emphasis on freedom of expression. Some activities should be school and/or community-based, as feasible, and the projects should involve as much interaction with American peers as possible. A community service element should also be included. • Providing logistical arrangements, homestay arrangements (as appropriate) and/or other accommodation, provisions for religious observance, disbursement of stipends/per diem, local travel, and travel between sites. • Facilitating substantive activities that are relevant to first amendment ideals while students are living with host families in U.S. communities. • Designing and implementing a host family/host community orientation regarding cultural background of participants, program goals and other aspects related to the participants' homestay experience. • Providing and/or supporting follow-on activities in the participants' geographic areas designed to reinforce the ideas, values and skills imparted during the U.S. exchange. *Recruitment and Selection:* The grant recipient will manage the recruitment and competitive merit-based selection of participants in consultation with the Public Affairs Sections

(PAS)at the U.S. Embassies overseas. Organizers must strive for the broadest regional and ethnic diversity within each country. The Department of State reserves final approval of all selected delegations. *Participants:* Each of the two delegations will be composed of 25 international participants—students (aged 15-18) and educators and/or community leaders who work with youth and who have a strong interest in learning more about the role of a free press in a democracy and the values and principles of free expression. Participants will be recruited from 3-5 countries (minimum of four students and one adult participant per country) in at least three of the following world regions: Central and South America, sub-Saharan Africa, Middle East and North Africa, South and Central Asia, the Caucasus, and Southeast Asia. In the spirit of diversity, ECA wishes to allow applicant organizations to propose countries in which they have strong partners. Applicants may present the same mix of countries for each delegation or the mix may vary. Participants should have a strong demonstrated interest in free expression, such as journalism, communications, advocacy, debate, or civic participation. English proficiency for international participants is required. It is desirable that 2-3 participants attend the same school or live in the same community so that they can support each other upon return. The adult participants should not only escort the students to the U.S., but also serve as adult advocates, ensuring the students take back and apply their newfound knowledge and supporting them in implementing their project ideas when they return. They should participate in program activities together with the youth. *U.S. Projects:* The program will consist of two exchange delegations consisting of 25 participants each. The itineraries for the two exchange delegations may be identical or may vary. The International Free Expression Institute will be conducted in the Washington, DC metro area. The remainder of the program should take place in other sites in the United States that demonstrate its geographic diversity. The program should focus primarily on interactive activities, practical experiences, and other hands-on opportunities to learn about the fundamentals of a civil society as related to first amendment ideals. A community service element will expose participants to the important role volunteerism plays in American society. Cultural and recreational activities will balance the schedule. Participants should be provided opportunities to attend informal and formal gatherings that allow for student presentations about their countries and cultures to further the goal of promoting mutual understanding. Discussion groups or facilitated conversational exchanges with their American peers are encouraged. *Post-exchange Follow-on Activities:* Follow-on programming for alumni is essential. Applicants should present creative and effective ways to address the program theme, for both program participants and their peers, as a means to amplify the program impact. The U.S. program will offer training and suggested activities to help prepare the participants for follow-on activities upon their return home. This will include training in project planning, the development of action plans and presentations, and other mechanisms that will enable alumni to effectively share and model their newly acquired knowledge and skills with their peers, schools, and communities. Plans for the participants' projects to reach the broadest and widest audiences are highly encouraged. Alumni programming in the form of seminars, newsletters, and listservs (where feasible) serves to maximize and extend the benefit of the participants' program in the United States. Examples include establishing a school or community based newspaper; advocating for a youth column in an existing publication; conducting a conference; offering small alumni grants for relevant projects; or creating web blogs, podcasts, or Web sites for teen peers about what participants learned. A strategy for continued communication and collaboration among the participants should be incorporated into the program. Alumni tracking is crucial for the evaluation of the program and for the implementation of follow-on programs. All alumni contact information gathered by the grant recipients on behalf of Youth Leadership Programs must be made available to the Department of State. II. Award Information *Type of Award:* Grant Agreement. *Fiscal Year Funds:* 2006. *Approximate Total Funding:* $300,000. *Approximate Number of Awards:* One or two. The Bureau reserves the right to consider supporting one grant for the administration of both projects or two separate grants for each project based on the proposals' responsiveness to the solicitation. *Approximate Average Award:* One award at approximately $300,000 or two awards at approximately $150,000. *Anticipated Award Date:* Grant period runs from Summer 2006 to Summer or Fall 2007, with the two U.S. projects taking place in Fall 2006 and Spring 2007. Grants should begin on or about July 31, 2006. *Anticipated Project Completion Date:* Summer 2007. Pending successful implementation of this program and the availability of funds in subsequent fiscal years, it is ECA's intent to renew this grant for two additional fiscal years, before openly competing it again. III. Eligibility Information III.1. Eligible Applicants Applications may be submitted by public and private non-profit organizations meeting the provisions described in Internal Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3). III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds There is no minimum or maximum percentage required for this competition. However, the Bureau encourages applicants to provide maximum levels of cost sharing and funding in support of its programs. The Freedom Forum and Close Up Foundation will plan, implement, and cost share the participants' tuition for the twelve-day Institute. This includes all administrative and participant expenses related to the twelve-day Institute: Curriculum development, instructional materials, speakers' fees, ground transportation for site visits, and room and board while in Washington, DC. This cost-share is outside of the funding amount to be awarded to the grantee organization. When cost sharing is offered by the grantee organization, it is understood and agreed that the applicant must provide the amount of cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal and later included in an approved grant agreement. Cost sharing may be in the form of allowable direct or indirect costs. For accountability, you must maintain written records to support all costs which are claimed as your contribution, as well as costs to be paid by the Federal Government. Such records are subject to audit. The basis for determining the value of cash and in-kind contributions must be in accordance with OMB Circular A-110, (Revised), Subpart C.23—Cost Sharing and Matching. In the event you do not provide the minimum amount of cost sharing as stipulated in the approved budget, ECA's contribution will be reduced in like proportion. III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements Bureau grant guidelines require that organizations with less than four years experience in conducting international exchanges be limited to $60,000 in Bureau funding. ECA anticipates awarding one or two grants, in amounts that exceed this threshold to support program and administrative costs required to implement this exchange program. Therefore, organizations with less than four years experience in conducting international exchanges are ineligible to apply under this competition. The Bureau encourages applicants to provide maximum levels of cost sharing and funding in support of its programs. IV. Application and Submission Information Note: Please read the complete **Federal Register** announcement before sending inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with applicants until the proposal review process has been completed. IV.1. Contact Information To Request an Application Package Please contact the Youth Programs Division of the Office of Citizen Exchanges, ECA/PE/C/PY, Room 568, U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547, phone:

(202)203-7517 and fax:

(202)203-7527, e-mail: *PetersML@state.gov* to request a Solicitation Package. Please refer to the Funding Opportunity Number ECA/PE/C/PY-06-22 located at the top of this announcement when making your request and on all other inquiries and correspondence. The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission Instruction

(PSI)document that consists of required application forms, and standard guidelines for proposal preparation. IV.2. To Download a Solicitation Package Via Internet The entire Solicitation Package includes the PSI and this RFGP, and may be downloaded from the Bureau's Web site at *http://exchanges.state.gov/education/rfgps/menu.htm.* Please read all information before downloading. IV.3. Content and Form of Submission Applicants must follow all instructions in the Solicitation Package. The application should be sent per the instructions under IV.3f. “Submission Dates and Times section” below. IV.3a. You Are Required To Have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering System

(DUNS)Number To Apply for a Grant or Cooperative Agreement From the U.S. Government This number is a nine-digit identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities. Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a DUNS number, access *http://www.dunandbradstreet.com* or call 1-866-705-5711. Please ensure that your DUNS number is included in the appropriate box of the SF-424 which is part of the formal application package. IV.3b. All Proposals Must Contain an Executive Summary, Proposal Narrative and Budget Please refer to the Solicitation Package. It contains the mandatory Proposal Submission Instructions

(PSI)document for additional formatting and technical requirements. IV.3c. You Must Have Nonprofit Status With the IRS at the Time of Application If your organization is a private nonprofit which has not received a grant or cooperative agreement from ECA in the past three years, or if your organization received nonprofit status from the IRS within the past four years, you must submit the necessary documentation to verify nonprofit status as directed in the PSI document. Failure to do so will cause your proposal to be declared technically ineligible. IV.3d. Please Take Into Consideration the Following Information When Preparing Your Proposal Narrative The applicant should submit a complete proposal describing the program in a convincing and comprehensive manner. The proposal should respond to the criteria set forth in the solicitation and other guidelines as clearly as possible. The proposal should address succinctly, but completely, the elements described below and must follow all format requirements. The proposal should include the following items: TAB A—SF-424 “Application for Federal Assistance Cover Sheet'' TAB B—Executive Summary In one double-spaced page, provide the following information about the project: 1. Name of applicant organization and participating institutions. 2. Participants. 3. Beginning and ending dates of the program. 4. Nature of activity and venues. TAB C—Narrative Within 20 double-spaced, single sided pages, provide a detailed description of the project addressing the areas listed below. In the narrative, applicants should not only describe major program activities but also explain and justify their programmatic choices. 1. Vision Describe the project objectives and the desired outcomes, i.e., the knowledge, skills, and/or attitudinal changes that the participants will acquire. Provide rationale for country and U.S. community selection. 2. Participating Organizations Identify any partner organizations for the program, their roles, and the applicant's reasons for including them. 3. Recruitment Describe how the applicant will advertise the program in targeted regions and coordinate the receipt of written applications. 4. Screening and Selection Describe in detail both the process and the criteria by which finalists will be selected. Members of the selection committee should be identified (at least by position). Provide a timetable and the specific procedures by which the applicant will notify candidates of their selection or non-selection. 5. Project Activities Describe in sufficient detail the major components of the two U.S. projects, including project planning, orientations, educational activities, cultural activities, meetings, site visits, community service, and the closing session. Provide a tentative schedule/itinerary of the projects, supplying a more detailed outline of daily activities in an appendix. 6. Travel, Housing, and Other Logistics Detail how the applicant will arrange international travel (in compliance with the Fly America Act); domestic travel; homestay, dormitory or other housing arrangements; ground transportation; stipend disbursement; and any other relevant administrative matters. 7. Post-Exchange Follow-on Activities Describe a plan to provide follow-on activities to the U.S.-based projects, including both ECA-funded and privately funded activities. 8. Program Monitoring and Evaluation The progress of the grant should be monitored closely and ECA/PAS must be kept informed of activities. In the submitted proposal, applicants should include a plan describing how success in meeting the stated goals of the program will be measured and reported. ECA recommends that the proposal include a draft survey questionnaire or other technique. 9. Diversity Explain how the program managers will be pro-active in supporting diversity in participant selection and in program content, demonstrating how diversity can contribute to a vibrant civil society. Diversity should be defined broadly and should include geographic, urban/rural, ethnic, racial, socio-economic, and religious diversity. 10. Institutional Capacity and Project Management Outline the applicant organization's capacity for doing projects of this nature, focusing on three areas of competency: provision of educational and thematic programs, age-appropriate programming for youth, and work in the specific countries for which you are applying. Describe the program staffing (individuals and responsibilities), qualifications, structure, and resources. 11. Work Plan/Schedule Outline the phases of the project planning and implementation for the entire grant period. TAB D—Budget Submission See section IV.3e. TAB E Letters of endorsement from partner organizations and/or sub-contractors. Applicants must include a copy of its Memo of Understanding (a draft is acceptable at this stage of the application) with the Close Up Foundation and the Freedom Forum that outlines the organizations' responsibilities and includes cost share contributions that will be made toward the program. Resumes of all program staff should be included in the submission. No one resume should exceed two pages. Attachments/appendices (please limit). TAB F Copy of IRS notification of current tax-exempt status SF-424B, “Assurances-Nonconstruction Programs''. Other attachments, if applicable. *IV.3d.1. Adherence To All Regulations Governing The J Visa.* The Office of Citizen Exchanges of the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs is the official program sponsor of the exchange program covered by this RFGP, and an employee of the Bureau will be the “Responsible Officer” for the program under the terms of 22 CFR 62, which covers the administration of the Exchange Visitor Program (J visa program). Under the terms of 22 CFR 62, organizations receiving grants under this RFGP will be third parties “cooperating with or assisting the sponsor in the conduct of the sponsor's program.” The actions of grantee program organizations shall be “imputed to the sponsor in evaluating the sponsor's compliance with” 22 CFR 62. Therefore, the Bureau expects that any organization receiving a grant under this competition will render all assistance necessary to enable the Bureau to fully comply with 22 CFR 62 *et seq.* The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs places great emphasis on the secure and proper administration of Exchange Visitor (J visa) Programs and adherence by grantee program organizations and program participants to all regulations governing the J visa program status. Therefore, proposals should *explicitly state in writing* that the applicant is prepared to assist the Bureau in meeting all requirements governing the administration of Exchange Visitor Programs as set forth in 22 CFR 62. If your organization has experience as a designated Exchange Visitor Program Sponsor, the applicant should discuss their record of compliance with 22 CFR 62 *et seq.* , including the oversight of their Responsible Officers and Alternate Responsible Officers, screening and selection of program participants, provision of pre-arrival information and orientation to participants, monitoring of participants, proper maintenance and security of forms, recordkeeping, reporting and other requirements. The Office of Citizen Exchanges of ECA will be responsible for issuing DS-2019 forms to participants in this program. A copy of the complete regulations governing the administration of Exchange Visitor

(202)203-5029, FAX:

(202)453-8640. *IV.3d.2. Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines.* Pursuant to the Bureau's authorizing legislation, programs must maintain a non-political character and should be balanced and representative of the diversity of American political, social, and cultural life. “Diversity” should be interpreted in the broadest sense and encompass differences including, but not limited to ethnicity, race, gender, religion, geographic location, socio-economic status, and physical challenges. Applicants are strongly encouraged to adhere to the advancement of this principle both in program administration and in program content. Please refer to the review criteria under the “Support for Diversity” section for specific suggestions on incorporating diversity into your proposal. Public Law 104-319 provides that “in carrying out programs of educational and cultural exchange in countries whose people do not fully enjoy freedom and democracy,” the Bureau “shall take appropriate steps to provide opportunities for participation in such programs to human rights and democracy leaders of such countries.” Public Law 106-113 requires that the governments of the countries described above do not have inappropriate influence in the selection process. Proposals should reflect advancement of these goals in their program contents, to the full extent deemed feasible. *IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and Evaluation.* Proposals must include a plan to monitor and evaluate the program's success, both as the activities unfold and at the end of the program. The Bureau recommends that your proposal include a draft survey questionnaire or other technique plus a description of a methodology to use to link outcomes to original project objectives. The Bureau expects that the grantee will track participants or partners and be able to respond to key evaluation questions, including satisfaction with the program, learning as a result of the program, changes in behavior as a result of the program, and effects of the program on institutions (institutions in which participants work or partner institutions). The evaluation plan should include indicators that measure gains in mutual understanding as well as substantive knowledge. Successful monitoring and evaluation depend heavily on setting clear goals and outcomes at the outset of a program. Your evaluation plan should include a description of your program's objectives, your anticipated program outcomes, and how and when you intend to measure these outcomes (performance indicators). The more that outcomes are “smart” (specific, measurable, attainable, results-oriented, and placed in a reasonable time frame), the easier it will be to conduct the evaluation. You should also show how your program objectives link to the goals of the program described in this RFGP. Your monitoring and evaluation plan should clearly distinguish between program *outputs* and *outcomes.* *Outputs* are products and services delivered, often stated as an amount. Output information is important to show the scope or size of program activities, but it cannot substitute for information about progress towards outcomes or the results achieved. Examples of outputs include the number of people trained or the number of seminars conducted. *Outcomes* , in contrast, represent specific results a program is intended to achieve and is usually measured as an extent of change. Findings on outputs and outcomes should both be reported, but the focus should be on outcomes. We encourage you to assess the following four levels of outcomes, as they relate to the program goals set out in the RFGP (listed here in increasing order of importance): 1. Participant satisfaction with the program and exchange experience. 2. Participant learning, such as increased knowledge, aptitude, skills, and changed understanding and attitude. Learning includes both substantive (subject-specific) learning and mutual understanding. 3. Participant behavior, concrete actions to apply knowledge in work or community; greater participation and responsibility in civic organizations; interpretation and explanation of experiences and new knowledge gained; continued contacts between participants, community members, and others. 4. Institutional changes, such as increased collaboration and partnerships, policy reforms, new programming, and organizational improvements. Please note: Consideration should be given to the appropriate timing of data collection for each level of outcome. For example, satisfaction is usually captured as a short-term outcome, whereas behavior and institutional changes are normally considered longer-term outcomes. Overall, the quality of your monitoring and evaluation plan will be judged on how well it

(1)specifies intended outcomes;

(2)gives clear descriptions of how each outcome will be measured;

(3)identifies when particular outcomes will be measured; and

(4)provides a clear description of the data collection strategies for each outcome (i.e., surveys, interviews, or focus groups). (Please note that evaluation plans that deal only with the first level of outcomes [satisfaction] will be deemed less competitive under the present evaluation criteria.) Grantees will be required to provide reports analyzing their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program reports. All data collected, including survey responses and contact information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years and provided to the Bureau upon request. IV.3e. Please Take the Following Information Into Consideration When Preparing Your Budget *IV.3e.1. Please submit a comprehensive line item budget, as stated in the Proposal Submission Instructions* . The available funding may be used to support the program and administrative costs necessary to implement the program as described in this solicitation. *An explanatory budget narrative must also be included* . For clarification, applicants may provide separate sub-budgets for each program component, phase, location, or activity. *IV.3e.2. Suggested program costs include, but are not limited to, the following:* • Staff travel. • Application and educational materials. • Participant travel (international, domestic, local ground transportation from/to airports and during non-Institute program period as necessary). • Orientations. • Cultural activities. • Meeting costs. • Post-exchange follow-on activities. • Evaluation. • Stipends or allowances. • Other justifiable expenses directly related to supporting program activities. The Freedom Forum and Close Up Foundation will cost share the participants' tuition for the twelve-day Institute in Washington, DC. This includes curriculum development, instructional materials, speakers' fees, ground transportation for site visits, and room and board. Therefore, the budget should not include any expenses for these twelve days of programming. Significant cost sharing is expected and will enhance the proposal. Homestays are not allowed as a grant-funded or cost-share item. While there is no rigid ratio of administrative to program costs, the Bureau urges applicants to keep administrative costs as low and reasonable as possible. Proposals should show strong administrative cost sharing contributions from the applicant, the in-country partner, and other sources. Maximum limits on grant funding are as follows: Books and educational materials allowance—$100 per participant; Conference room rental costs—$250 per day per room; Consultant fees and honoraria—$250/day; Cultural allowance—$150 per participant; Per diem-standard government rates; Working meals—one per project; Evaluation costs—2% to 5% of the grant. Organizations are encouraged to cost-share any rates that exceed these amounts. The Bureau reserves the right to reduce, revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of the program and the availability of funds. Please note that there are no fees for the J-1 visas that foreign participants will use to enter the United States; there may be visa fees for the U.S. travelers. Applicants should budget for applicants to travel to the nearest U.S. embassy or consulate for visa interviews. Exchange participants will be enrolled in the Bureau's Accident and Sickness Program for Exchanges (ASPE). Applicants need not include these insurance costs in their budgets. IV.3f. Application Deadline and Methods of Submission *Application Deadline Date:* Monday, May 8, 2006. *Reference Number:* ECA/PE/C/PY-06-22. *Methods of Submission:* Applications may be submitted in one of two ways:

(1)In hard copy, via a nationally recognized overnight delivery service (i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS, Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal Service Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or

(2)Electronically through *http://www.grants.gov* . Along with the Program Title, all applicants must enter the above Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory Proposal Submission Instructions

(PSI)of the solicitation document. *IV.3f.1. Submitting Printed Applications* . Applications must be shipped no later than the above deadline. Delivery services used by applicants must have in-place, centralized shipping identification and tracking systems that may be accessed via the Internet and delivery people who are identifiable by commonly recognized uniforms and delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before the above deadline but received at ECA more than seven days after the deadline will be ineligible for further consideration under this competition. Proposals shipped after the established deadlines are ineligible for consideration under this competition. ECA will *not* notify you upon receipt of application. It is each applicant's responsibility to ensure that each package is marked with a legible tracking number and to monitor/confirm delivery to ECA via the Internet. Delivery of proposal packages *may not* be made via local courier service or in person for this competition. Faxed documents will not be accepted at any time. Only proposals submitted as stated above will be considered. Important note: When preparing your submission please make sure to include one extra copy of the completed SF-424 form and place it in an envelope addressed to “ECA/EX/PM”. Applicants must follow all instructions in the Solicitation Package. The original and eight copies of the application should be sent to: U.S. Department of State, SA-44, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Reference Number: ECA/PE/C/PY-06-22, Program Management, ECA/EX/PM, Room 534, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547. *IV.3f.2. Submitting Electronic Applications.* Applicants have the option of submitting proposals electronically through Grants.gov ( *http://www.grants.gov* ). Complete solicitation packages are available at Grants.gov in the “Find” portion of the system. Please follow the instructions available in the “Get Started” portion of the site ( *http://www.grants.gov/GetStarted* ). Applicants have until midnight (12 a.m.) of the closing date to ensure that their entire applications have been uploaded to the grants.gov site. Applications uploaded to the site after midnight of the application deadline date will be automatically rejected by the grants.gov system, and will be technically ineligible. Applicants will receive a confirmation e-mail from grants.gov upon the successful submission of an application. ECA will *not* notify you upon receipt of electronic applications. IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of Applications Executive Order 12372 does not apply to this program. V. Application Review Information V.1. Review Process The Bureau will review all proposals for technical eligibility. Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they do not fully adhere to the guidelines stated herein and in the Solicitation Package. All eligible proposals will be reviewed by the program office, as well as the Public Diplomacy section overseas, where appropriate. Eligible proposals will be subject to compliance with Federal and Bureau regulations and guidelines and forwarded to Bureau grant panels for advisory review. Proposals may also be reviewed by the Office of the Legal Adviser or by other Department elements. Final funding decisions are at the discretion of the Department of State's Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final technical authority for assistance awards grants agreements resides with the Bureau's Grants Officer. Review Criteria Technically eligible applications will be competitively reviewed according to the criteria stated below. These criteria are not rank ordered and all carry equal weight in the proposal evaluation: 1. Quality of the program idea: The proposed program should be well developed, responding to the design outlined in the solicitation, and demonstrating originality. It should be clearly and accurately written, substantive, and with sufficient detail. Proposals should exhibit originality, substance, precision, and relevance to the Bureau's mission. 2. Program planning and ability to achieve program objectives: A detailed agenda and work plan should clearly demonstrate how project objectives will be achieved. The agenda and plan should adhere to the program overview and guidelines described above. The substance of workshops, seminars, presentations, school-based activities, and/or site visits should be described in detail. Objectives should be reasonable, feasible, and flexible. The proposal should clearly demonstrate how the institution will meet the program's objectives and plan. 3. Support of diversity: The proposal should demonstrate the recipient's commitment to promoting the awareness and understanding of diversity in program content. Applicants should demonstrate readiness to accommodate participants with physical disabilities. 4. Institutional capacity and track record: Proposed personnel and institutional resources should be adequate and appropriate to achieve the program goals. The proposal should demonstrate an institutional record, including responsible fiscal management and full compliance with all reporting requirements for past Bureau grants as determined by the Bureau's Office of Contracts. The Bureau will consider the past performance of prior recipients and the demonstrated potential of new applicants. 5. Cross-cultural sensitivity and area expertise: Applicants must demonstrate their understanding of the area in which they propose to work and should demonstrate sensitivity to participants' values, customs, and life experiences in all aspects of the program. 6. Post-exchange follow-on activities: Proposals should provide a plan for Bureau- and grantee-supported follow-on activities that insure this exchange is not an isolated event. 7. Project evaluation: The proposal should include a plan to evaluate the activity's success, both as the activities unfold and at the end of the program. The proposal should include a draft survey questionnaire or other technique plus description of a methodology to use to link outcomes to original project objectives. 8. Cost-effectiveness and cost sharing: The applicant should demonstrate efficient use of Bureau funds. The overhead and administrative components of the proposal, including salaries and honoraria, should be kept as low as possible. All other items should be necessary and appropriate. The proposal should maximize cost-sharing through other private sector support as well as institutional direct funding contributions, which demonstrates institutional and community commitment. VI. Award Administration Information VI.1a. Award Notices Final awards cannot be made until funds have been appropriated by Congress, allocated and committed through internal Bureau procedures. Successful applicants will receive an Assistance Award Document

(1)A final program and financial report no more than 90 days after the expiration of the award; and

(2)Quarterly program and financial reports that should include how you are meeting the goals and objectives of the program and plans for next steps. Grantees will be required to provide reports analyzing their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program reports. (Please refer to IV. Application and Submission Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program Monitoring and Evaluation information. All data collected, including survey responses and contact information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years and provided to the Bureau upon request. All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer listed in the final assistance award document. VI.4. Program Data Requirements Organizations awarded grants will be required to maintain specific data on program participants and activities in an electronically accessible database format that can be shared with the Bureau as required. As a minimum, the data must include the following:

(1)Name, address, contact information and biographic sketch of all persons who travel internationally on funds provided by the grant or who benefit from the grant funding but do not travel.

(2)Itineraries of international and domestic travel, providing dates of travel and cities in which any exchange experiences take place. Final schedules for in-country and U.S. activities must be received by the ECA Program Officer at least three work days prior to the official opening of the activity. VII. Agency Contacts For questions about this announcement, contact: Michele Peters, Program Officer, Office of Citizen Exchanges, ECA/PE/C/PY, Room 568, Reference Number: ECA/PE/C/PY-06-22, U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547, phone:

(202)203-7517 and fax:

(202)203-7527, e-mail: *PetersML@state.gov.* All correspondence with the Bureau concerning this RFGP should reference the above title and number ECA/PE/C/PY-06-22. Please read the complete **Federal Register** announcement before sending inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with applicants until the proposal review process has been completed. VIII. Other Information Notice: The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding and may not be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory information provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language will not be binding. Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an award commitment on the part of the Government. The Bureau reserves the right to reduce, revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be subject to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section VI.3 above. Dated: March 10, 2006. C. Miller Crouch, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. [FR Doc. 06-2561 Filed 3-15-06; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 14

Traces to 14 documents

U.S. Code