Notices. Notice of public meetings

8,994 words·~41 min read·/register/2006/03/07/06-2193

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [I.D. 030106D] New England Fishery Management Council; Public Meetings AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Notice of public meetings. SUMMARY: The New England Fishery Management Council (Council) is scheduling a public meetings of its Scallop Advisory Panel and General Category Scallop Advisory Panels in March, 2006 to consider actions affecting New England fisheries in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ).

Recommendations from these groups will be brought to the full Council for formal consideration and action, if appropriate. DATES: These meetings will be held on Tuesday, March 21, 2006, at 9:30 a.m. and Wednesday, March 22, 2006, at 9:30 a.m. ADDRESSES: These meetings will be held at the Holiday Inn, 225 McClellan Highway, Boston, MA 02128; telephone:

(617)569-5250; fax:

(617)561-0971. *Council address* : New England Fishery Management Council, 50 Water Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, New England Fishery Management Council; telephone:

(978)465-0492. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The panel's schedule and agenda for the meetings are as follows: 1. *Tuesday, March 21, 2006; Scallop Advisory Panel meeting.* 2. *Wednesday, March 22, 2006; General Category Scallop Advisory Panel meeting.* The advisory panels will review public comments received during scoping for Amendment 11 to the Sea Scallop Fishery Management Plan (FMP). The advisors will also review the scoping document for Amendment 11 and make recommendations to the Scallop Oversight Committee related to the scope of the action. The advisors will discuss potential alternatives for consideration in Amendment 11 including, but not limited to, identifying an appropriate range of resource allocation options involving the limited access and general category scallop fisheries and potential qualification criteria for a limited entry program for the general category fishery. The advisors may also consider other topics as directed by the Scallop Oversight Committee. Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come before these groups for discussion, those issues may not be the subject of formal action during these meetings. Action will be restricted to those issues specifically listed in this notice and any issues arising after publication of this notice that require emergency action under section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, provided the public has been notified of the Council's intent to take final action to address the emergency. Special Accommodations These meetings are physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be directed to Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, at

(978)465-0492, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date. Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 *et seq.* Dated: March 2, 2006. Tracey L. Thompson, Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. E6-3154 Filed 3-6-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-22-S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [I.D. 030106E] New England Fishery Management Council; Public Meetings AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce ACTION: Notice of public meetings. SUMMARY: The New England Fishery Management Council (Council) is scheduling a public meetings of its Monkfish Advisory Panel and Monkfish Oversight Committee in March, 2006 to consider actions affecting New England fisheries in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ). Recommendations from these groups will be brought to the full Council for formal consideration and action, if appropriate. DATES: These meetings will be held on Thursday, March 23, 2006, at 9:30 a.m. and Friday, March 24, 2006, at 9:30 a.m. ADDRESSES: These meetings will be held at the Holiday Inn, One Newbury Street, Peabody, MA 01960; telephone:

(978)535-4600; fax:

(978)535-8238. *Council address* : New England Fishery Management Council, 50 Water Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, New England Fishery Management Council; telephone:

(978)465-0492. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The schedules and agendas for the meetings are as follows: *1. Thursday, March 23, 2006; Monkfish Advisory Panel meeting.* The advisory panel will review the monkfish stock status and rebuilding program, as well as other information and recommendations developed by the Monkfish Plan Development Team. In addition to developing recommendations to the Monkfish Committee on approaches to meet the stock rebuilding goals by 2009, the advisors will identify and discuss other issues for consideration in Framework 4 and, to the extent possible at this time, outline management approaches to address those concerns. The Panel's recommendations will be forwarded to the Monkfish Committee and the Council at their respective upcoming meetings. *2. Friday, March 24, 2006; Monkfish Oversight Committee meeting.* The committee will review the monkfish stock status and rebuilding program, as well as other information and recommendations developed by the Monkfish Plan Development Team. The Committee will also review and discuss the recommendations and proposals developed by the Monkfish Advisory Panel. In addition to outlining management approaches to meet the stock rebuilding goals by 2009 for consideration by the Council, the Committee will identify and discuss other issues for consideration in Framework 4 and, to the extent possible at this time, outline management approaches to address those concerns. The Committee's recommendations will be reported to the Council at its April 4-5 meeting. Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come before these groups for discussion, those issues may not be the subject of formal action during these meetings. Action will be restricted to those issues specifically listed in this notice and any issues arising after publication of this notice that require emergency action under section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, provided the public has been notified of the Council's intent to take final action to address the emergency. Special Accommodations These meetings are physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be directed to Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, at

(978)465-0492, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date. Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 *et seq.* Dated: March 2, 2006. Tracey L. Thompson, Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. E6-3155 Filed 3-6-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-22-S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [I.D. 030206A] New England Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Notice of a public meeting. SUMMARY: The New England Fishery Management Council (Council) is scheduling a public meeting of its Scallop Committee in March, 2006 to consider actions affecting New England fisheries in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ). Recommendations from this group will be brought to the full Council for formal consideration and action, if appropriate. DATES: The meeting will be held on Friday, March 31, 2006, at 9 a.m. ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Hilton Garden Inn, One Thuber Street, Warwick, RI 02886; telephone:

(401)734-9600; fax:

(401)734-9700. *Council address* : New England Fishery Management Council, 50 Water Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, New England Fishery Management Council; telephone:

(978)465-0492. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The committee will review public comments received during scoping for Scallop Amendment 11. The Committee will also review input from both the Scallop and General Category Scallop Advisory Panels about the scope of Amendment 11. The committee will review and recommend for Council consideration goals and objectives for Amendment 11. The committee will begin development alternatives for consideration in the Amendment 11 Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (DSEIS), including, but not limited to, identifying an appropriate range of resource allocation between the limited access and general category scallop fisheries and potential qualification criteria for a limited entry program for the general category fishery and will identify research priorities for the research set-aside program for fishing year 2007. The committee may consider other topics at their discretion. Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come before this group for discussion, those issues may not be the subject of formal action during this meeting. Action will be restricted to those issues specifically listed in this notice and any issues arising after publication of this notice that require emergency action under section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, provided the public has been notified of the Council's intent to take final action to address the emergency. Special Accommodations This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be directed to Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, at 978-465-0492, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date. Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 *et seq.* Dated: March 2, 2006. Tracey L. Thompson, Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. E6-3156 Filed 3-6-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-22-S DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION [CFDA No.: 84.128J] Recreational Programs AGENCY: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Department of Education. ACTION: Notice of intent to fund down the grant slate for the Recreational Programs. SUMMARY: The Secretary intends to use the grant slate developed for the Recreational Programs in Fiscal Year

(FY)2005 to make new grant awards in FY 2006. The Secretary takes this action because a significant number of high-quality applications remain on the last year's grant slate and limited funding is available for new grant awards in FY 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ed Hofler, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room 5065, Potomac Center Plaza, Washington, DC 20202-2800. Telephone:

(202)245-7377. If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may call the Federal Relay Service

(FRS)at 1-800-877-8339. Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an alternative format ( *e.g.* , Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer diskette) on request to the program contact person listed in this section. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On February 7, 2005, we published a notice in the **Federal Register** (70 FR 6428) inviting applications for new awards under Recreational Programs. This notice indicated that the selection criteria, absolute priority, and application requirements contained in the notice would apply to the FY 2005 grant competition only. We received a significant number of applications for grants under Recreational Programs in FY 2005 and made nine new grant awards. Because such a large number of high-quality applications were received, many applications that were awarded high scores by peer reviewers did not receive funding last year. Limited funding is available for new awards under this program in FY 2006. In order to conserve funding that would have been required for a peer review of new applications submitted under the program, we intend to select grantees in FY 2006 from the existing slate of applicants. This slate was developed during the FY 2005 competition using the selection criteria, absolute priority, and application requirements included in the February 7, 2005, notice. No changes to the selection criteria, absolute priority, or application requirements will be required by this action. Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 775. *Electronic Access to This Document:* You may view this document, as well as all other documents of this Department published in the **Federal Register** , in text or Adobe Portable Document Format

(PDF)on the Internet at the following site: *www.ed.gov/news/fedregister* . To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at this site. If you have questions about using PDF, call the U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1-888-293-6498; or in the Washington, DC, area at

(202)512-1530. Note: The official version of this document is the document published in the **Federal Register** . Free Internet access to the official edition of the **Federal Register** and the Code of Federal Regulations is available on GPO Access at: *www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/index.html* . Dated: March 2, 2006. John H. Hager, Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. [FR Doc. E6-3175 Filed 3-6-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000-01-P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [EPA-HQ-OW-2006-0138, 0136 and 0139; EPA-HQ-OW-2002-0053 and 0064; and EPA-HQ-OW-2003-0011; FRL-8041-4] Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request on Six Information Collection Requests

(ICRs)AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act

(PRA)(44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.* ), this document announces that EPA is planning to submit a request to renew existing approved Information Collection Requests

(ICR)to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Before submitting the ICRs to OMB for review and approval, EPA is soliciting comments on specific aspects of the proposed information collections as described below. DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before May 8, 2006. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by the Docket ID numbers provided for each item in the text, by one of the following methods: • *www.regulations.gov* : Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. • *E-mail: ow-docket@epa.gov* (Identify Docket ID No. in the subject line) • *Mail:* Water Docket, Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 4203M, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460. Please include a total of three copies. • *Hand Delivery:* EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. *Instructions:* Direct your comments identified by the Docket ID numbers provided for each item in the text. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at *www.regulations.gov* , including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information

(CBI)or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through *www.regulations.gov* or e-mail. The *www.regulations.gov* Web site is an “anonymous access” system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public docket, visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at *http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm* . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lynn Stabenfeldt, Office of Wastewater Management, 4201M, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: 202.564.0602; fax number: 202.501.2399; e-mail address: *stabenfeldt.lynn@epa.gov* . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: How Can I Access the Docket and/or Submit Comments? EPA has established a public docket for each of the ICRs identified in this document (see the Docket ID. Numbers for each ICR that are provided in the text), which is available for online viewing at *www.regulations.gov* , or in person viewing at the Water Docket in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room is open from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is 202-566-1744, and the telephone number for the Water Docket is 202-566-2426. Use *www.regulations.gov* to obtain a copy of the draft collection of information, submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Once in the system, select “search,” then key in the docket ID number identified in this document. What Information Is EPA Particularly Interested in? Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, EPA specifically solicits comments and information to enable it to:

(i)Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the information will have practical utility;

(ii)Evaluate the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;

(iii)Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and

(iv)Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, *e.g.* , permitting electronic submission of responses. In particular, EPA is requesting comments from very small businesses (those that employ less than 25) on examples of specific additional efforts that EPA could make to reduce the paperwork burden for very small businesses affected by this collection. What Should I Consider When I Prepare My Comments for EPA? You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your comments: 1. Explain your views as clearly as possible and provide specific examples. 2. Describe any assumptions that you used. 3. Provide copies of technical information/data you used that support your views. 4. If you estimate potential burden or costs, explain how you arrived at the estimate that you provide. 5. Offer alternative ways to improve the collection activity. 6. Make sure to submit your comments by the deadline identified under DATES . 7. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify the docket ID number assigned to this action in the subject line on the first page of your response. You may also provide the name, date, and **Federal Register** citation. What Information Collection Activities or ICRs Does This Apply to? Applications for National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Discharge Permits and the Sewage Sludge Management Permits, EPA ICR No. 0226.18, OMB Control No. 2040-0086; Notice of Intent for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity under a NPDES General Permit, EPA ICR No. 1842.05, OMB Control No. 2040-0188; NPDES Storm Water Program Phase II, EPA ICR No. 1820.04, OMB Control No. 2040-0211; NPDES and ELG Regulatory Revision for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations, EPA ICR No. 1989.03, OMB Control No. 2040-0250; NPDES Modification and Variance Requests, EPA ICR No. 0029.09, OMB Control No. 2040-0068; NPDES and Sewage Sludge Management State Programs, EPA ICR No. 0168.09, OMB Control No. 2040-0057. Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2006-0138 *Affected entities:* Entities potentially affected by this action are publicly owned treatment works (POTWs), privately owned treatment works, new and existing manufacturing and commercial dischargers, storm water dischargers, treatment works treating domestic sewage (TWTDS), and other entities that apply for NPDES permits. *Title:* Applications for National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Discharge Permits and the Sewage Sludge Management Permits. *ICR numbers:* EPA ICR No. 0226.18, OMB Control No. 2040-0086. *ICR status:* This ICR is currently scheduled to expire on June 30, 2006. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the **Federal Register** when approved, are listed in 40 CFR Part 9, and displayed either by publication in the **Federal Register** or by other appropriate means, such as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR Part 9. *Abstract:* This ICR calculates the burden and costs associated with permit applications for NPDES discharges and sewage sludge management activities. EPA uses the data contained in applications and supplemental information requests to set appropriate permit conditions, issue permits, and assess permit compliance. EPA maintains certain national application information in databases that assist permit writers in determining permit conditions. For most permits, EPA has developed standard application forms. In some cases, such as requests for additional information and storm water applications from municipal separate sewer systems, standard forms do not exist because standard forms are not appropriate for the information collected or because they have not been developed. Application forms correspond to the different types of applicants, each form requesting information necessary for issuing permits to the associated applicants. Applicants include POTWs, privately owned treatment works, new and existing manufacturing and commercial dischargers, storm water dischargers, TWTDS, and others. Depending on the application form they are using, applicants may be required to supply information about their facilities, discharges, treatment systems, sewage sludge use and disposal practices, pollutant sampling data, or other relevant information. Section 308 of the Clean Water Act authorizes EPA to request from dischargers any information that may be reasonably required to carry out the objectives and provision of the Act. Under this authority, EPA sometimes requests information supplemental to that contained in permit applications. In its burden and cost calculations, this ICR includes requests for information supplemental to permit applications. Other parts of the Clean Water Act and federal regulations authorize EPA to collect information that supplements permit applications, such as section 403(c). This ICR calculates the burden and costs for all information collection activities associated with applications for permits. Application information is necessary to obtain an NPDES or sewage sludge permit. *Burden Statement:* The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average five hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. The ICR provides a detailed explanation of the Agency's estimate, which is only briefly summarized here: *Estimated total number of potential respondents:* 291,898. *Frequency of response:* Once every five years. *Estimated total average number of responses for each respondent:* One. *Estimated total annual burden hours:* 1,398,737 hours. *Estimated total annual costs:* $53,546,023. This includes an estimated burden cost of $53,546,023 and an estimated cost of $0 for capital investment or maintenance and operational costs. Further, as part of this ICR renewal, EPA plans to transfer 1,244 burden hours from Milestones Plans for the Bleached Papergrade Kraft and Soda Subcategory of the Pulp, Paper and Paperboard Manufacturing Category, EPA ICR No. 1877.03, OMB Control No. 2040-0202, to this ICR, which would bring the estimated total annual burden hours noted above to 1,399,981. The remaining 174 burden hours from EPA ICR No. 1877.03, will be transferred to NPDES Compliance Assessment/Certification Information, EPA ICR No. 1427.07, OMB Control No. 2040-0110. EPA ICR No. 1877.03 subsequently will be phased out. Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2003-0011 *Affected entities:* Entities potentially affected by this action are those which have storm water discharges associated with large construction activity (40 CFR 122.25(b)(14)(x)) to waters of the U.S. *Title:* Notice of Intent for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity under a NPDES General Permit. *ICR numbers:* EPA ICR No. 1842.05, OMB Control No. 2040-0188. *ICR status:* This ICR is currently scheduled to expire on June 30, 2006. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the **Federal Register** when approved, are listed in 40 CFR Part 9, and displayed either by publication in the **Federal Register** or by other appropriate means, such as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR Part 9. *Abstract:* This ICR calculates the burden and costs associated with the preparation of the Notice of Intent

(NOI)for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity under a NPDES General Permit, and the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). EPA uses the data contained in the NOIs to track facilities covered by the storm water general permit and assess permit compliance. EPA has developed a form for construction NOIs. The standard one page form is called: Notice of Intent

(NOI)for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity Under a NPDES General Permit (EPA Form Number 3510-6). The construction NOI form requires the following information to be submitted, signed, and certified to by an authorized representative of the project: —Name, address, phone number of the facility. —Status of the owner/operator (whether federal, state, public, or private). —Name and location of the project (City, State, ZIP, Latitude, Longitude, County). —Whether the facility is located on Indian Country Lands. —Whether a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) has been prepared. —Optional: location for viewing SWPPP and telephone number for scheduling viewing times: Address, City, State, ZIP. —The name of the receiving water. —Estimated construction start date and completion date. —The estimated area to be disturbed (to nearest acre). —An estimate of the likelihood of discharge. —Whether any protected species or critical habitat in the project area. —Which section of part I.B.3.e(2) of the permit through which permit eligibility with regard to protection of endangered species is satisfied. Respondents are required to obtain coverage under the NPDES General Permit for storm water discharges associated with construction activity. *Burden Statement:* The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 38.3 hours per response by large construction NPDES permittees in NPDES-authorized states and territories and 40.5 hours per response for construction activities in states and territories where EPA is the permitting authority. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. The ICR provides a detailed explanation of the Agency's estimate, which is only briefly summarized here: *Estimated total number of potential respondents:* 201,259. *Frequency of response:* Once initially, prior to commencement of construction *Estimated total average number of responses for each respondent:* Two. *Estimated total annual burden hours:* 7,920,245 hours. *Estimated total annual costs:* $264,919,148. This includes an estimated burden cost of $264,919,148 and an estimated cost of $0 for capital investment or maintenance and operational costs. Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2002-0053 *Affected entities:* Entities potentially affected by this action are NPDES permittees, including operators of small municipal separate storm sewer systems, small construction activity, and industrial facilities identified in 40 CFR 122.26(b)(14)(i)-(ix) and

(xi)that qualify for a no exposure exemption. *Title:* NPDES Storm Water Program Phase II. *ICR numbers:* EPA ICR No. 1820.04, OMB Control No. 2040-0211. *ICR status:* This ICR is currently scheduled to expire on June 30, 2006. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the **Federal Register** when approved, are listed in 40 CFR Part 9, and displayed either by publication in the **Federal Register** or by other appropriate means, such as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR Part 9. *Abstract:* This ICR calculates the burden and costs associated with the regulation of storm water discharges under Phase II of the NPDES storm water program. Specifically, it calculates the burden for developing and implementing small MS4 storm water permits, small construction (1-5 acres) permits, and submitting a no-exposure certification form (EPA form 3510-11). The ICR also specifies the burden on authorized NPDES States to process and administer the Phase II program. *Burden Statement:* The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 21 hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. The ICR provides a detailed explanation of the Agency's estimate, which is only briefly summarized here: *Estimated total number of potential respondents:* 327,163. *Frequency of response:* Varies. *Estimated total average number of responses for each respondent:* Varies. *Estimated total annual burden hours:* 4,958,353 hours. *Estimated total annual costs:* $142,543,556. This includes an estimated burden cost of $142,543,556 and an estimated cost of $0 for capital investment or maintenance and operational costs. Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2006-0136 *Affected entities:* Entities potentially affected by this action are owners and operators of Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs). *Title:* NPDES and ELG Regulatory Revision for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations. *ICR numbers:* EPA ICR No. 1989.03, OMB Control No. 2040-0250. *ICR status:* This ICR is currently scheduled to expire on July 31, 2006. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the **Federal Register** when approved, are listed in 40 CFR Part 9, and displayed either by publication in the **Federal Register** or by other appropriate means, such as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR Part 9. *Abstract:* This ICR calculates the burden and costs associated with the NPDES and ELG regulations for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs). These regulations regulate land application of manure, litter and wastewater generated at CAFO facilities. The rule requires all facilities defined as a CAFO to apply for a NPDES permit. *Burden Statement:* The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 18 hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. The ICR provides a detailed explanation of the Agency's estimate, which is only briefly summarized here: *Estimated total number of potential respondents:* 11,941. *Frequency of response:* Varies. *Estimated total average number of responses for each respondent:* Varies *Estimated total annual burden hours:* 1,890,000 hours. *Estimated total annual costs:* $7.9 million. This includes an estimated burden cost of $5.0 million and an estimated cost of $2.9 million for capital investment or maintenance and operational costs. Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2002-0064 *Affected entities:* Entities potentially affected by this action are NPDES permit applicants that request a variance or modification of the NPDES or sewage sludge management conditions. *Title:* NPDES Modification and Variance Requests. *ICR numbers:* EPA ICR No. 0029.09, OMB Control No. 2040-0068. *ICR status:* This ICR is currently scheduled to expire on November 30, 2006. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the **Federal Register** when approved, are listed in 40 CFR Part 9, and displayed either by publication in the **Federal Register** or by other appropriate means, such as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR Part 9. *Abstract:* This ICR estimates the burden and costs associated with modifications and variances made to NPDES permits and to National Sewage Sludge Management Program permit requirements. Prior to permit issuance, a NPDES permit applicant may request a variance from the conditions that would normally be imposed on the applicant's discharge. Although any interested party may request a variance, such requests are usually made by the applicant. An applicant must submit information so the permitting authority can assess whether the facility is eligible for a variance, and what deviation is necessary. Once a NPDES or sludge-only permit is issued, a facility is subject to the permit limits and conditions for the life of the permit. However, events may occur during this period that would render the permit limits or conditions inappropriate. Responding to such events may require a modification of the NPDES or sewage sludge management permit conditions. The causes that can lead to permit modifications are established in 40 CFR 122.62 and 122.63. The regulations specify information a facility must report in order for EPA to determine whether a permit modification is warranted. Each provision requires similar information. *Burden Statement:* The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 23 hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. The ICR provides a detailed explanation of the Agency's estimate, which is only briefly summarized here: *Estimated total number of potential respondents:* 13,137. *Frequency of response:* On occasion. *Estimated total average number of responses for each respondent:* Varies. *Estimated total annual burden hours:* 303,997 hours. *Estimated total annual costs:* $10,952,021. This includes an estimated burden cost of $10,952,021 and an estimated cost of $0 for capital investment or maintenance and operational costs. Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2006-0139 *Affected entities:* Entities potentially affected by this action are States, Territories, and American Indian Tribal Entities. *Title:* NPDES and Sewage Sludge Management State Programs. *ICR numbers:* EPA ICR No. 0168.09, OMB Control No. 2040-0057. *ICR status:* This ICR is currently scheduled to expire on November 30, 2006. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the **Federal Register** when approved, are listed in 40 CFR Part 9, and displayed either by publication in the **Federal Register** or by other appropriate means, such as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR Part 9. *Abstract:* This ICR estimates the burden and costs associated with NPDES and Sewage Sludge Management State Programs. Under the NPDES program, States, Federally Recognized Indian Tribes, and U.S. Territories, hereafter referred to as States, may acquire the authority to issue permits. These governments have the option of acquiring authority to issue general permits (permits that cover a category or categories of similar discharges). States with existing NPDES programs must submit requests for program modifications to add pretreatment, Federal facilities, or general permit authority. In addition, as Federal statutes and regulations are modified, States must submit program modifications to ensure that their program continues to meet Federal requirements. States have the option of obtaining a sludge management program. This program may be a component of a State NPDES Program, or it may be administered by a separate program. *Burden Statement:* The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 50.3 hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. The ICR provides a detailed explanation of the Agency's estimate, which is only briefly summarized here: *Estimated total number of potential respondents:* 613. *Frequency of response:* Semi-annually, quarterly, on occasion, every five years, on-going. *Estimated total average number of responses for each respondent:* Varies. *Estimated total annual burden hours:* 966,966 hours. *Estimated total annual costs:* $30,169,349. This includes an estimated burden cost of $30,169,349 and an estimated cost of $0 for capital investment or maintenance and operational costs. Dated: February 28, 2006. James A. Hanlon, Director, Office of Wastewater Management. [FR Doc. E6-3153 Filed 3-6-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [FRL-8041-3] Control of Emissions From New and In-Use Highway Vehicles and Engines: Approval of New Scheduled Maintenance for Diesel Particulate Filters in Certain Applications AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: This notice announces that EPA has established a minimum interval of 80,000 miles (or 2400 hours) for the scheduled maintenance (cleaning) of diesel particulate filters used in some space-constrained truck applications. This minimum interval applies for model years 2007-2009. Diesel particulate filter cleaning is considered critical emission-related maintenance. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Dickinson, Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Ariel Rios Building (6405J), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460. Telephone:

(202)343-9256. E-mail address: *dickinson.david@epa.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Agency adopted new emission standards for heavy-duty diesel engines (HDDEs) in 2001 (66 FR 5002; January 18, 2001). These standards will result in the introduction of new highly-effective control technologies, beginning with a phase-in over the 2007-09 model years. We expect that diesel particulate filters (DPFs), also called particulate traps, will be used to meet the new standards on HDDEs beginning in 2007. The Agency has received information from two heavy-duty engine manufacturers, Caterpillar, Inc. and DaimlerChrysler, indicating that it is technologically necessary to perform the cleaning of uncombusted deposits from DPFs in certain space-constrained truck applications more frequently than at the minimum maintenance interval prescribed for this activity in 40 CFR 86.004-25(b)(4)(iii). These applications use engines in the medium- and heavy-heavy-duty service classes. One reason this minimum interval is included in the regulations is to ensure that the control of emissions in use is not compromised by a manufacturer's overly frequent scheduling of emission-related maintenance. However, § 86.094-25(b)(7)(ii) provides a process by which a manufacturer may request EPA approval of new scheduled maintenance, provided that such requests include supporting data and other substantiation for the recommended maintenance category (emission-related or non-emission-related, critical or non-critical) and for the interval suggested for emission-related maintenance. The information received from the manufacturers pertains to the technologically necessary maintenance interval only and not to the appropriate maintenance category for DPF cleaning. The Agency has already determined that DPFs (particulate traps) are critical emission-related components ( *see* § 86.004-25(b)(6)(i)(G)). Based on our review of the manufacturers' data, we have established a technologically necessary minimum maintenance interval of 80,000 miles (or 2400 hours) for DPF cleaning on a number of specialty vehicle applications, primarily in the medium-heavy-duty service class. None of these are applications with high sales volumes such as line-haul trucks or heavy-duty pick-up trucks. The truck applications covered by this notice are those in which the application's purpose imposes severe space constraints on the situating of exhaust system components. The DPF units being designed for use in 2007 vehicles are somewhat larger than the mufflers that they replace, and are sized such that they include sufficient excess filter volume to store the uncombustible ash that normally accumulates between cleanings. There are steps a manufacturer can take to minimize the DPF volume needed for ash build-up, such as through redesigning the engine to burn less lubricating oil, which in turn lowers the oil-derived ash accumulation rate. Our review of the information provided by the manufacturers indicates that they have taken reasonable steps to limit ash build-up through such means, but that the resulting filter volumes are still too large to fit in the space available. However, a modest decrease in the filter volume reserved for ash build-up, made possible through the more frequent scheduling of routine cleaning, results in a DPF small enough to fit in these applications. Based on a review of the information provided by the manufacturers, we have concluded that the following truck applications have space constraints that warrant this shorter minimum allowable maintenance interval: • Beverage truck; • Maintenance truck with integral tool boxes; • Garbage collection truck with hydraulic packing or picking apparatus; • Fire truck; • Airport refueler truck with exhaust directed toward the front of the truck; • Utility truck with integral tool boxes and outrigger apparatus; • Snow plow with under-chassis plow; • Dump truck; • Concrete mixer truck; • Car hauler with integral open racks; • Street sweeper; • Armored car; • Day cab truck (only those for which the entire DPF is located in front of the vertical plane established by the back side of the cab, and which furthermore do not have a rear seat). Any manufacturer of engines used in applications on this list could make use of this provision. This minimum interval applies only to vehicles with engines in the medium- and heavy-HDDE service classes (that is, with gross vehicle weight ratings above 19,500 lbs); no information was provided establishing such a need in the light-HDDE service class. The functional needs of the applications in this list typically preclude the routing of exhaust systems in a vertical stack or in the space behind the cab outside the frame rails. However, if any model year 2007-09 trucks in this list are in fact designed with a DPF mounted in a vertical stack or in the space behind the cab outside the frame rails, they will not be eligible for the 80,000 mile minimum interval because no case has been established for space limitations in such designs. Also, if an engine family is used in multiple truck applications, some of which are not included in the above list, the engines used in “non-listed” applications are not eligible for the 80,000 mile minimum interval. For these engines the manufacturer must provide the owners with proper maintenance instructions that specify the applicable interval, as required under § 86.087-38. In addition, to make use of this 80,000 mile minimum maintenance interval, manufacturers must indicate their intention in the applications for certification. They must also state their intent to help ensure that the smaller DPFs will only be installed in the approved truck applications, and must show the reasonable likelihood of the maintenance being performed in use as required under CFR § 86.004-25(b)(6), with consideration given to the shorter specified maintenance interval. Although the 80,000 mile interval is significantly shorter than the nominal 150,000 mile interval that would otherwise apply, there are a number of factors helping to provide confidence that this maintenance is as likely to be properly performed on schedule. First, the covered vehicle applications are commercial in nature. In general, routine maintenance on commercial vehicles is more likely to be performed on schedule to avoid the costly job delays, customer dissatisfaction, workforce idling, and emergency repairs arising from component failures in the field, and also of course to avoid jeopardizing warranty coverage. Second, many of these vehicles are not typically driven over large distances during the course of a year. As a result, filter cleaning at 80,000 mile (or 2400 hour) intervals is not likely to be so frequent as to irritate vehicle operators or hamper them from accomplishing their daily tasks, which might in turn cause them to neglect the needed cleaning. Third, the continued build-up of ash from a lack of cleaning would increase engine backpressure, resulting in loss of power, poor fuel economy, and eventually vehicle stalling. Commercial vehicle drivers and maintenance technicians are likely to be well aware of these serious consequences from neglected maintenance. Fourth, we expect that most or all manufacturers will provide a visible signal or some similar indication to inform a driver of the need for filter cleaning, thus reducing reliance on manual tracking of vehicle mileage to provide the needed reminder that maintenance is due. Finally, DPF cleaning is covered under the “critical emission-related components” provision of 40 CFR 86.004-25(b)(6). Thus, manufacturers are “required to show the reasonable likelihood of such maintenance being performed in use.” A number of means are available to make this showing, including the visible signal indication mentioned above. We are limiting this determination to the 2007-2009 model years for two reasons. First, we believe that the problem of redesigning the covered vehicles to accommodate DPFs, though a matter of technological necessity, arises largely from the time remaining before 2007, which precludes manufacturers performing an extensive redesign of these space-constrained vehicles to accommodate the DPFs. Given more time, the somewhat larger DPFs needed to achieve 150,000 mile cleaning intervals could be accommodated in vehicle designs without compromising mission objectives. Second, the compliance strategies being chosen by the engine manufacturers generally entail a two step approach to meeting the new NO X standards, such that NO X aftertreatment devices will not be employed until 2010, and engine/vehicle designs will remain stable through the 2007-2009 phase-in period. Although the technology choices for 2010 NO X control have not yet been made, we think it likely that new exhaust system space requirements will be added to those entailed by the use of DPFs in 2007. Given that three additional years of leadtime are available before 2010, and that adjusting the DPF cleaning interval can contribute, at best, only modest relief to these space constraint problems, we expect manufacturers to rely on broader vehicle redesigns rather than on shorter cleaning intervals to resolve any such problems. Should that process identify applications in which shorter DPF cleaning intervals are still technologically necessary for 2010 and later heavy-duty vehicles, we would expect manufacturers to take this up with us in a timely manner. Dated: February 27, 2006. William L. Wehrum, Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Air and Radiation. [FR Doc. E6-3146 Filed 3-6-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [FRL-8041-1] Good Neighbor Environmental Board AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice of meeting. SUMMARY: Under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, P.L. 92463, EPA gives notice of a meeting of the Good Neighbor Environmental Board. The Board meets three times each calendar year at different locations along the U.S.-Mexico border and in Washington, DC. It was created by the Enterprise for the Americas Initiative Act of 1992. An Executive Order delegates implementing authority to the Administrator of EPA. The Board is responsible for providing advice to the President and the Congress on environmental and infrastructure issues and needs within the States contiguous to Mexico in order to improve the quality of life of persons residing on the United States side of the border. The statute calls for the Board to have representatives from U.S. Government agencies; the governments of the States of Arizona, California, New Mexico and Texas; and private organizations with expertise on environmental and infrastructure problems along the southwest border. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the recommendations of the Board's 9th Report on Air Quality and Transportation and Cultural and Natural Resources. The Board will also hear from speakers about the topic of its next report: Balancing Border Security and Environmental Protection. A copy of the meeting agenda will be posted at *http://www.epa.gov/ocem/gneb.* DATES: The Good Neighbor Environmental Board will hold an open meeting on Tuesday, March 14, from 9 a.m. (registration at 8:30 a.m.) to 5:30 p.m. ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Doubletree Hotel, Terrace Ballroom, 1515 Rhode Island Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. Telephone: 202-232-7000. The meeting is open to the public, with limited seating on a first-come, first-served basis. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elaine Koerner, Designated Federal Officer, *koerner.elaine@epa.gov,* 202-233-0069, U.S. EPA, Office of Cooperative Environmental Management (1601E), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Requests to make brief oral comments or provide written statements to the Board should be sent to Elaine Koerner, Designated Federal Officer, at the contact information above. *Meeting Access:* For information on access or services for individuals with disabilities, please contact Elaine Koerner at 202-233-0069 or *koerner.elaine@epa.gov.* To request accommodation of a disability, please contact Elaine Koerner, preferably at least 10 days prior to the meeting, to give EPA as much time as possible to process your request. Dated: February 22, 2006. Elaine Koerner, Designated Federal Officer. [FR Doc. E6-3152 Filed 3-6-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION [CC Docket No. 92-237; DA 06-354] Next Meeting of the North American Numbering Council AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: On March 2, 2006, the Commission released a public notice announcing the March 14, 2006 meeting and agenda of the North American Numbering Council (NANC). The intended effect of this action is to make the public aware of the NANC's next meeting and agenda. (This notice is not being published in the **Federal Register** at least 15 days prior to the meeting due to the press of other business). DATES: Tuesday, March 14, 2006, 9:30 a.m. ADDRESSES: Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, Portals II, 445 Twelfth Street, SW., Suite 5-A420, Washington, DC 20554. Requests to make an oral statement or provide written comments to the NANC should be sent to Deborah Blue. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah Blue, Special Assistant to the Designated Federal Officer

(DFO)at

(202)418-1466 or *Deborah.Blue@fcc.gov.* The fax number is:

(202)418-2345. The TTY number is:

(202)418-0484. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Released: March 2, 2006. The North American Numbering Council

(NANC)has scheduled a meeting to be held Tuesday, March 14, 2006, from 9:30 a.m. until 5 p.m. The meeting will be held at the Federal Communications Commission, Portals II, 445 Twelfth Street, SW., Room TW-C305, Washington, DC. This meeting is open to members of the general public. The FCC will attempt to accommodate as many participants as possible. The public may submit written statements to the NANC, which must be received two business days before the meeting. In addition, oral statements at the meeting by parties or entities not represented on the NANC will be permitted to the extent time permits. Such statements will be limited to five minutes in length by any one party or entity, and requests to make an oral statement must be received two business days before the meeting. Reasonable accommodations for people with disabilities are available upon request. Include a description of the accommodation you will need including as much detail as you can. Also include a way we can contact you if we need more information. Please allow at least 5 days advance notice; last minute requests will be accepted, but may be impossible to fill. Send an e-mail to *fcc504@fcc.gov* or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at

(202)418-0530 (voice),

(202)418-0432 (tty). Proposed Agenda—Tuesday, March 14, 2006, 9:30 a.m.* 1. Announcements and Recent News. 2. Approval of Minutes. —Meeting of November 30, 2005. —Meeting of January 24, 2006. 3. Report of the North American Numbering Plan Administrator (NANPA). 4. Report of the National Thousands Block Pooling Administrator (PA). 5. Report of the North American Portability Management

(NAPM)LLC. 6. Status of the Industry Numbering Committee

(INC)activities. 7. Report of the North American Numbering Plan Billing and Collection (NANP B&C) Agent. 8. Report of the Billing & Collection Working Group (B&C WG). 9. Reports from the Issues Management Groups (IMGs). — NANC Operating Manual IMG. 10. Report of the Local Number Portability Administration

(LNPA)Working Group. 11. Report of the Numbering Oversight Working Group (NOWG). 12. Report of the Future of Numbering Working Group (FoN WG). —Including report of pANI IMG. 13. Special Presentations (None scheduled). 14. Update List of the NANC Accomplishments. 15. Summary of Action Items. 16. Public Comments and Participation (5 minutes per speaker). 17. Other Business. Adjourn no later than 5 p.m. Next Meeting: Tuesday, May 16, 2006. *The Agenda may be modified at the discretion of the NANC Chairman with the approval of the DFO. Federal Communications Commission. Marilyn Jones, Attorney, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau. [FR Doc. 06-2193 Filed 3-6-06; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 2

Traces to 2 documents

U.S. Code

7 references not yet in our index

29 USC 775
40 CFR 9
40 CFR 122.25(b)(14)(x)
40 CFR 122.26(b)(14)(i)
40 CFR 122.62
40 CFR 86.004-25(b)(4)(iii)
40 CFR 86.004-25(b)(6)

Citation graph

cites case law

Notices

Notice of public meetings

U.S.C.§ 1801

U.S.C.§ 3501

Cite29 USC 775

Cite40 CFR 9

Cite40 CFR 122.25(b)(14)(x)

Cite40 CFR 122.26(b)(14)(i)

Cite40 CFR 122.62

Cites 9 · showing 7Cited by 0 across 0 sources