Notices. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

9,032 words·~41 min read·/register/2006/02/21/06-1624·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4510-30-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Mine Safety and Health Administration Petitions for Modification The following parties have filed petitions to modify the application of existing safety standards under section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977. 1. Bridger Coal Company [Docket No. M-2006-004-C] Bridger Coal Company, P.O. Box 68, Point of Rocks, Wyoming 82942 has filed a petition to modify the application of 30 CFR 75.1902(c)(2)(i), (ii), and

(iii)(Underground diesel fuel storage-general requirements) to its Bridger Coal Underground Mine (MSHA I.D. No. 48-01646) located in Sweetwater County, Wyoming. The petitioner requests a modification of the existing standard as it pertains to temporary underground diesel fuel storage area location. The petitioner proposes to:

(i)Store the temporary diesel transportation unit no more than 1,000 feet from the section loading point, or projected loading point during equipment installation, or the last designated loading point during equipment removal;

(ii)equip the diesel fuel transportation unit with an MSHA approved automatic fire suppression system that meets the requirements of 30 CFR 75.1911;

(iii)equip the diesel fuel storage tank with an MSHA-approved automatic fire suppression system that is installed to meet the requirements of 30 CFR 75.1911; and

(iv)permit a certified person to examine the temporary diesel fuel storage area twice at each shift as required by 30 CFR 75.362, when work is being performed inby the temporary diesel fuel storage area, and conduct a pre-shift examination of the diesel fuel storage area as required by 30 CFR 75.360, when work is performed in the area. The petitioner has listed specific procedures in this petition that will be followed when the proposed alternative method is implemented. The petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative method would provide at least the same measure of protection as the existing standard. 2. Rosebud Mining Company [Docket No. M-2006-005-C] Rosebud Mining Company, P.O. Box 1025, Northern Cambria, Pennsylvania 15714 has filed a petition to modify the application of 30 CFR 75.1710-1 (Canopies or cabs; self-propelled electric face equipment; installation requirements) to its Clementine Mine (MSHA I.D. No. 36-08862) located in Armstrong County, Pennsylvania. The petitioner proposes to use the Long-Airdox Mobile Bridge Carrier, Model Number MBC-27L (frame height 25.5 inches) and the Fletcher Roof Bolter, Model RRII-13, C-F (frame height 30 inches) without canopies in specific areas of the mine, due to widely varying mining heights. The petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative method would provide at least the same measure of protection as the existing standard. 3. CONSOL Energy, Inc. [Docket No. M-2006-006-C] CONSOL Energy, Inc., 1800 Washington Road, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15241-1421 has filed a petition to modify the application of 30 CFR 75.503 (Permissible electric face equipment; maintenance) to its Blacksville No. 2 Mine (MSHA I.D. No. 46-01968) located in Monongalia County, West Virginia. The petitioner requests a modification of the existing standard to permit the use of a non-permissible battery-operated surveying instrument inby the last open crosscut. The petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative method would provide at least the same measure of protection as the existing standard. Request for Comments Persons interested in these petitions are encouraged to submit comments via E-mail: *zzMSHA-Comments@dol.gov* ; Fax:

(202)693-9441; or Regular Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Mine Safety and Health Administration, Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances, 1100 Wilson Boulevard, Room 2350, Arlington, Virginia 22209. All comments must be postmarked or received in that office on or before March 23, 2006. Copies of these petitions are available for inspection at that address. Dated at Arlington, Virginia this 10th day of February 2006. Robert F. Stone, Acting Director, Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances. [FR Doc. E6-2396 Filed 2-17-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-43-P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-53276; File No. SR-NASD-2005-098] Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to the Submission of SEC Rule 15c2-11 Information on Non-Nasdaq Securities February 13, 2006. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) 1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, 2 notice is hereby given that on August 18, 2005, the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (“NASD”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) proposed rule change SR-NASD-2005-098 as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by NASD. On January 10, 2006, NASD filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change. 3 The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change, as amended, from interested persons. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b-4. 3 Amendment No. 1 made certain technical and clarifying changes to the original rule filing of August 18, 2005. Amendment No. 1 supersedes and replaces the original rule filing in its entirety. I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change NASD is proposing to amend NASD Rule 6740 to

(1)relieve members of the obligation to file with NASD copies of certain information that is electronically accessible through the SEC's Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (“EDGAR”) system; and

(2)exclude from NASD Rule 6740 quotation activity for which the SEC has granted an exemption under SEC Rule 15c2-11(h). Below is the text of the proposed rule change. Proposed new language is *italicized* ; proposed deletions are in [brackets]. 6740. Submission of Rule 15c2-11 Information on Non-Nasdaq Securities

(a)Except as provided in SEC Rule 15c2-11(f)(1), (2), (3), and

(5)*and 15c2-11(h)* under the Act, no member shall initiate or resume the quotation of a non-Nasdaq security in any quotation medium unless the member has demonstrated compliance with this rule and the applicable requirements for information maintenance under Rule 15c2-11. A member shall demonstrate compliance by making a filing with, and in the form required by, [the Association] *NASD* , which filing must be received at least three business days before the member's quotation is published or displayed in the quotation medium.

(b)The information to be filed shall contain one copy of all information required to be maintained under SEC Rule 15c2-11(a)(1), (2), (3)(iii), (4)(ii), or (5), including any information that may be required by future amendments thereto. *Members are not required to file with NASD copies of any information that is available through the SEC's Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (“EDGAR”) system; provided, however, that the filing with NASD shall contain identifying information for each issuer report or statement available through EDGAR that was relied upon in satisfying the member's obligations under this Rule and SEC Rule 15c2-11(a), including the type of report, report date and any other information as may be requested by NASD.* In addition, this filing shall identify the issuer, the issuer's predecessor in the event of a merger or reorganization within the previous 12 months, the type of non-Nasdaq security to be quoted ( *e.g.* , ADR, warrant, unit, or common stock), the quotation medium to be used, the member's initial or resumed quotation, and the particular subsection of Rule 15c2-11 with which the member is demonstrating compliance. Additionally, if a member is initiating or resuming quotation of a non-Nasdaq security with a priced entry, the member's filing must specify the basis upon which that priced entry was determined and the factors considered in making that determination.

(c)If a member's initial or resumed quotation does not include a priced entry, a member shall supplement its prior filing under this Rule, in the form required by [the Association] *NASD* , before inserting a priced entry for the affected non-Nasdaq security in a quotation medium. The supplemental filing shall specify the basis upon which the proposed priced entry was determined and the factors considered in making that determination. The supplemental filing must be received by [the Association] *NASD* at least three business days before the member's priced entry first appears in a quotation medium.

(d)All filings made with [the Association] NASD under this Rule must be reviewed and signed by a principal of the member firm. II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, NASD included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. NASD has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose NASD Rule 6740 prohibits a member from initiating or resuming the quotation of a non-Nasdaq security 4 in a quotation medium unless the member has demonstrated compliance with the requirements of SEC Rule 15c2-11 pertaining to the review and maintenance of specified information about the security and issuer. To demonstrate compliance with both NASD Rule 6740 and SEC Rule 15c2-11, a member must file with NASD a Form 211, together with the information required under SEC Rule 15c2-11(a), at least three business days before the quotation is published or displayed. 4 For purposes of this rule, “non-Nasdaq security” is defined in NASD Rule 6710(c) as “any equity security that is neither included in The Nasdaq Stock Market nor traded on any national securities exchange.” Much of the information that is required under SEC Rule 15c2-11(a) for reporting issuers, such as prospectuses, offering circulars and annual reports, is publicly available through the SEC's EDGAR system. NASD believes that there is no policy purpose served in requiring members to file with NASD copies of such information. Accordingly, NASD is proposing to relieve members of the obligation to file with NASD copies of information that is electronically accessible through the SEC's EDGAR system. NASD believes the proposed rule change, as amended, will eliminate the administrative burden and cost imposed on members in furnishing such information to NASD. Although members will not be required to file the information with NASD, they will nonetheless remain obligated under NASD Rule 6740 to review and maintain information as required by SEC Rule 15c2-11. In addition, members currently are required to identify on the Form 211 the type and date of each report or statement that is submitted to NASD. Under the proposed rule change, as amended, where copies of documents are not submitted to NASD because they are available through EDGAR, members will continue to be required to provide on the Form 211 the type and date of each report or statement, as well as other information as may be requested by NASD relating to each report or statement for the reporting issuer that the member relied upon in satisfying its information review obligations under NASD Rule 6740 and SEC Rule 15c2-11(a). 5 5 If information other than the type and date of the statement or report is required to be submitted by members under this proposed provision, NASD will provide notice of these additional requirements in a Notice to Members. In addition, paragraphs

(f)and

(h)of SEC Rule 15c2-11 set forth the exclusions to the rule's information review and maintenance requirements. NASD Rule 6740(a) tracks the SEC Rule 15c2-11(f) exceptions, 6 but does not contain an exclusion for those quotations pursuant to which the Commission has granted an exemption, upon request or its own motion, under SEC Rule 15c2-11(h). NASD believes that the terms for filing a Form 211 under NASD Rule 6740 should conform to SEC Rule 15c2-11; members should not be required to review, maintain and file information under the NASD rule if there is no similar obligation under the SEC rule. Accordingly, NASD is proposing to amend NASD Rule 6740 to relieve members of their obligations under the rule in the event that the Commission has granted an exemption to any quotation under SEC Rule 15c2-11(h). To the extent that the Commission's exemptive relief applies any terms and conditions to such relief, those same terms and conditions would apply to the exclusion under NASD Rule 6740. 6 Because the definition of “non-Nasdaq security” under NASD Rule 6710(c) excludes debt instruments, NASD Rule 6740 does not refer to subsection (f)(4) of SEC Rule 15c2-11, which relates to municipal securities. Finally, NASD no longer refers to itself using its full corporate name, “the Association,” or “the NASD.” Instead, NASD uses the name “NASD” unless otherwise appropriate for corporate or regulatory reasons. Accordingly, the proposed rule change, as amended, replaces, as a technical change, several references in NASD Rule 6740 to “the Association” with the name “NASD.” NASD will announce the effective date of the proposed rule change, as amended, in a *Notice to Members* to be published no later than 60 days following Commission approval. The effective date will be 30 days following publication of the *Notice to Members* announcing Commission approval. 2. Statutory Basis NASD believes that the proposed rule change, as amended, is consistent with the provisions of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act, which requires, among other things, that NASD rules must be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. NASD believes that harmonizing NASD Rule 6740 and SEC Rule 15c2-11, so that members are not required to review, maintain and file information under the NASD rule when they are not required to review and maintain such information under the SEC rule, is consistent with the Act. Moreover, SEC Rule 15c2-11 is, by its terms, “a means reasonably designed to prevent fraudulent, deceptive or manipulative acts or practices,” and thus, NASD believes that harmonizing NASD Rule 6740 and SEC Rule 15c2-11 is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition NASD does not believe that the proposed rule change, as amended, will result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others Written comments were neither solicited nor received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the **Federal Register** or within such longer period

(i)as the Commission may designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or

(ii)as to which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:

(A)By order approve such proposed rule change, as amended, or

(B)Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change, as amended, should be disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission's Internet comment form ( *http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml* ); or • Send an e-mail to *rule-comments@sec.gov.* Please include File Number SR-NASD-2005-098 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASD-2005-098. This file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site ( *http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml* ). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of NASD. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to the File Number SR-NASD-2005-098 and should be submitted on or before March 10, 2006. For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority. 7 7 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). Nancy M. Morris, Secretary. [FR Doc. E6-2368 Filed 2-17-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8010-01-P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-53277; File No. SR-NYSE-2006-03] Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Extend for an Additional Six Months the Pilot Program Permitting a Floor Broker and an RCMM To Use an Exchange Authorized and Provided Portable Telephone on the Exchange Floor February 13, 2006. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) 1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, 2 notice is hereby given that on January 31, 2006, the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (“NYSE” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b-4. I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange seeks to extend its pilot program that amends NYSE Rule 36 (Communication Between Exchange and Members' Offices) to allow Floor brokers and Registered Competitive Market Makers (“RCMMs”) to use Exchange authorized and provided portable telephones on the Exchange Floor upon approval by the Exchange (“Pilot”) for an additional six months, until July 31, 2006. The last extension of the Pilot was in effect on a six-month pilot basis expiring on January 31, 2006. 3 The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site ( *http://www.nyse.com* ), at the Exchange's principal office, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room. 3 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52188 (August 1, 2005), 70 FR 46252 (August 9, 2005) (SR-NYSE-2005-53). II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose Background The Commission originally approved the Pilot to be implemented as a six-month pilot 4 beginning no later than June 23, 2003. 5 Since the inception of the Pilot, the Exchange has extended the Pilot five times, with the current Pilot expiring on January 31, 2006. 6 Most recently, the Exchange incorporated RCMMs into the Pilot and clarified the conditions under which a Floor broker may use an Exchange authorized and provided portable phone. 7 The Exchange has also filed for permanent approval of NYSE Rule 36, as amended. 8 4 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 47671 (April 11, 2003), 68 FR 19048 (April 17, 2003) (SR-NYSE-2002-11) (“Original Order”). 5 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 47992 (June 5, 2003), 68 FR 35047 (June 11, 2003) (SR-NYSE-2003-19) (delaying the implementation date for portable phones from on or about May 1, 2003 to no later than June 23, 2003). 6 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 48919 (December 12, 2003), 68 FR 70853 (December 19, 2003) (SR-NYSE-2003-38) (extending the Pilot for an additional six months ending on June 16, 2004); 49954 (July 1, 2004), 69 FR 41323 (July 8, 2004) (SR-NYSE-2004-30) (extending the Pilot for an additional five months ending on November 30, 2004); 50777 (December 1, 2004), 69 FR 71090 (December 8, 2004) (SR-NYSE-2004-67) (extending the Pilot for an additional four months ending March 31, 2005); 51464 (March 31, 2005), 70 FR 17746 (April 7, 2005) (SR-NYSE-2005-20) (extending the Pilot for additional four months ending July 31, 2005); and 52188, *supra* note 3. 7 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53213 (February 2, 2006) (SR-NYSE-2005-80). 8 *See* SR-NYSE-2004-52 (September 7, 2004). With respect to regulatory actions concerning the Pilot, there is an open investigation into possible insider trading in an NYSE listed security in which the trading activity of two RCMMs has been identified and is under review. The use of an Exchange authorized and provided portable phone by one of the RCMMs in or about January 2005 is under review as part of the investigation. No administrative or technical problems, other than routine telephone maintenance issues, have resulted from the Pilot over the past few months. 9 Therefore, the Exchange seeks to extend the Pilot for an additional six months, until July 31, 2006. 9 The Exchange notes that it has received incoming telephone records for Floor brokers for the period of July 4, 2005 through January 31, 2006, and for RCMMs for the period of November 22, 2005 through January 31, 2006, and will continue to receive monthly updates. NYSE Rule 36 NYSE Rule 36 governs the establishment of telephone or electronic communications between the Exchange Floor and any other location. Prior to the Pilot, NYSE Rule 36.20 prohibited the use of portable telephone communications between the Exchange Floor and any off-Floor location. The only way that voice communication could be conducted by Floor brokers between the Exchange Floor and an off-Floor location prior to the Pilot was by means of a telephone located at a broker's booth. These communications often involved a customer calling a broker at the booth for “market look” information. Prior to the Pilot, a broker could not use a portable phone at the point of sale in the trading crowd to speak with a person located off the Exchange Floor. Furthermore, until recently, NYSE Rule 36.20 only applied to a Floor broker's ability to use an Exchange authorized and provided portable phone. 10 RCMMs are non-specialist members of the Exchange and do not have the same type of information ( *i.e.* , access to the Display Book®) that a specialist has. As such, the Exchange believes it is appropriate for RCMMs to participate in the Pilot so that they can communicate with their offices in order to, among other things, enter off-Floor orders and better monitor their positions. 11 10 Telephone conversation between Jeff Rosenstrock, Senior Counsel, NYSE, and Molly M. Kim, Attorney, Division of Market Regulation, Commission, on February 8, 2006. 11 The Exchange has developed surveillance and examination procedures to monitor the activities of RCMMs, including their use of Exchange authorized and provided portable phones. The Exchange proposes to extend the Pilot for an additional six months, expiring on July 31, 2006. The Pilot would amend NYSE Rule 36 to permit Floor brokers and RCMMs to use Exchange authorized and issued portable telephones on the Exchange Floor. Thus, with the approval of the Exchange, a Floor broker would be permitted to engage in direct voice communication from the point of sale to an off-Floor location, such as a member firm's trading desk or the office of one of the broker's customers. Such communications would permit the broker to accept orders consistent with Exchange rules 12 and provide status and oral execution reports of orders previously received, as well as “market look” observations as have historically been routinely transmitted from a broker's booth location. Moreover, the Pilot would allow RCMMs to use an Exchange authorized and portable phone solely to communicate with their or their member organizations' off-Floor office and the off-Floor office of their clearing member organization, to enter off-Floor orders, and to discuss matters related to the clearance and settlement of transactions, provided the off-Floor office uses a wired telephone line for these discussions. RCMMs, however, would not be allowed to use a portable phone to conduct any agency business until issues involving the use of portable phones by RCMMs acting in the capacity of agent have been fully reviewed and resolved by NYSE Regulation in consultation with the Commission. 13 For both RCMMs and Floor brokers, use of a portable telephone on the Exchange Floor other than one authorized and issued by the Exchange would continue to be prohibited. 12 Floor brokers receiving orders from the public over portable phones must be properly qualified to engage in such “direct access” business under NYSE Rules 342 and 345, among others. 13 Allowing RCMMs acting as Floor brokers to use Exchange authorized and provided portable phones would involve further discussions with the Commission and would be the subject of a separate filing with the Commission. Furthermore, both incoming and outgoing calls would continue to be allowed, provided the requirements of all other Exchange rules have been met. Under NYSE Rule 123(e), a broker would not be permitted to represent and execute any order received as a result of such voice communication unless the order was first properly recorded by the member and entered into the Exchange's Front End Systemic Capture (“FESC”) electronic database. 14 In addition, Exchange rules require that any Floor broker receiving orders from the public over portable phones must be properly qualified to engage in such direct access business under NYSE Rules 342 and 345, among others. 15 14 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 43689 (December 7, 2000), 65 FR 79145 (December 18, 2000) (SR-NYSE-98-25). *See also* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 44943 (October 16, 2001), 66 FR 53820 (October 24, 2001) (SR-NYSE-2001-39) (discussing certain exceptions to FESC, such as orders to offset an error or a bona fide arbitrage, which may be entered within 60 second after a trade is executed). 15 *See* Information Memos 01-41 (November 21, 2001), 01-18 (July 11, 2001) (available on *http://www.nyse.com* ) and 91-25 (July 8, 1991) for more information regarding Exchange requirements for conducting a public business on the Exchange Floor. In addition, NYSE Rule 36 does not apply to specialists, who are prohibited from speaking from the post to upstairs trading desks or customers. 16 The Exchange notes that specialists are subject to separate restrictions in NYSE Rule 36 on their ability to engage in voice communications from the specialist post to an off-Floor location. 17 16 NYSE Rule 36.30 provides that, with the approval of the Exchange, a specialist unit may maintain a telephone line at its stock trading post location to the off-Floor offices of the specialist unit or the unit's clearing firm. Such telephone connection shall not be used for the purpose of transmitting to the Floor orders for the purchase or sale of securities, but may be used to enter options or futures hedging orders through the unit's off-Floor office or the unit's clearing firm, or through a member (on the Exchange Floor) of an options or futures exchange. 17 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 46560 (September 26, 2002), 67 FR 62088 (October 3, 2002) (SR-NYSE-00-31) (discussing restrictions on specialists' communications from the post). By enabling customers to speak directly to a Floor broker in a trading crowd on an Exchange authorized and issued portable telephone and by allowing RCMMs to communicate with their upstairs office's land line and the land line of their clearing member organization's upstairs office, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change would expedite and make more direct the free flow of information which, prior to the Pilot, had to be transmitted somewhat more circuitously via the booth. The Exchange believes that an extension of the Pilot for an additional six months would enable the Exchange to provide more direct, efficient access to its trading crowds and customers, increase the speed of transmittal of orders and the execution of trades, and provide an enhanced level of service to customers in an increasingly competitive environment. 18 18 *See, e.g.,* Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 43493 (October 30, 2000), 65 FR 67022 (November 8, 2000) (SR-CBOE-00-04) (expanding the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc.'s existing policy and rules governing the use of telephones at equity option trading posts by allowing for the receipt of orders over outside telephone lines from any source, directly at equity trading posts) and 43836 (January 11, 2001), 66 FR 6727 (January 22, 2001) (SR-PCS-00-33) (discussing and approving the Pacific Exchange's proposal to remove current prohibitions against Floor brokers' use of cellular or cordless phones to make calls to persons located off the trading floor). Pilot Program Results Since the Pilot's inception, the Exchange represents that there have been approximately 800 portable phone subscribers. 19 In addition, with regard to portable phone usage, for a sample week of December 5, 2005 through December 9, 2005, an average of 10,951 calls per day were originated from portable phones, and an average of 4,932 calls per day were received on portable phones. Of the calls originated from portable phones, an average of 7,216 calls per day was internal calls to the booth, and 3,735 calls per day were external calls. Thus, approximately 66% of the calls originated from portable phones were internal calls to the booth. With regard to received calls, of the 4,932 average calls per days received, an average of 2,472 calls per day was external calls and an average of 2,460 calls per day was internal calls received from the booth. Thus, approximately 50% of all received calls were internally generated and 50% were calls from the outside. 19 The data includes both Floor brokers' and RCMMs' usage of Exchange authorized and provided phones. Telephone conversation between Jeff Rosenstrock, Senior Special Counsel, NYSE, and Molly M. Kim, Attorney, Division of Market Regulation, Commission, on February 7, 2006. Therefore, the Exchange believes that the Pilot appears to be successful in that there is a reasonable degree of usage of portable phones. Furthermore, except as noted above, there have been no other regulatory, administrative, or other technical problems identified with their usage. The Exchange also believes that the Pilot appears to facilitate communication on the Exchange Floor for both Floor brokers and RCMMs without any corresponding drawbacks. Therefore, the Exchange believes it is appropriate to extend the Pilot for an additional six months, expiring on July 31, 2006. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act 20 in general, and further the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 21 in particular, in that it is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange believes that the amendment to NYSE Rule 36 would support the mechanism of free and open markets by providing for increased means by which communications to and from the Exchange Floor could take place. 20 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 21 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not:

(i)Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest;

(ii)impose any significant burden on competition; and

(iii)become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, it has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 22 and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder. 23 At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. 22 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 23 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). The Exchange requests that the Commission waive the 30-day operative period under Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii). 24 The Exchange believes that the continuation of the Pilot is in the public interest as it will avoid inconvenience and interruption to the public. The Commission believes that it is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest to waive the 30-day operative delay and make this proposed rule change immediately effective upon filing on January 31, 2006. 25 The Commission believes that the waiver of the 30-day operative delay will allow the Exchange to continue, without interruption, the existing operation of its Pilot until July 31, 2006. 24 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii). 25 For purposes only of waiving, the 30-day operative delay of this proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). The Commission notes that proper surveillance is an essential component of any telephone access policy to an exchange trading floor. Surveillance procedures should help to ensure that Floor brokers and RCMMs use portable phones as authorized by NYSE Rule 36 26 and that orders are being handled in compliance with NYSE rules. The Commission expects the Exchange to actively review these procedures and address any potential concerns that have arisen during the Pilot. In this regard, the Commission notes that the Exchange should address whether telephone records are adequate for surveillance purposes. 26 *See* note 11 *supra* and accompanying text for other NYSE requirements that Floor brokers be properly qualified before doing public customer business. The Commission also requests that the Exchange report any problems, surveillance, or enforcement matters associated with the Floor brokers' and RCMMs' use of an Exchange authorized and provided portable telephone on the Exchange Floor. As stated in the Original Order, the NYSE should also address whether additional surveillance would be needed because of the derivative nature of the ETFs. Furthermore, in any future additional filings on the Pilot, the Commission would expect that the NYSE submit information documenting the usage of the phones, any problems that have occurred, including, among other things, any regulatory actions or concerns, and any advantages or disadvantages that have resulted. 27 27 In the future, the Commission expects the information to distinguish between Floor brokers' and RCMMs' usage of the phones. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission's Internet comment form ( *http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml* ); or • Send an e-mail to *rule-comments@sec.gov.* Please include File Number SR-NYSE-2006-03 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2006-03. This file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site ( *http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml* ). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the NYSE. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2006-03 and should be submitted on or before March 14, 2006. For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority. 28 28 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). Nancy M. Morris, Secretary. [FR Doc. E6-2367 Filed 2-17-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8010-01-P SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Request and Comment Request The Social Security Administration

(SSA)publishes a list of information collection packages that will require clearance by the Office of Management and Budget

(OMB)in compliance with Public Law 104-13, the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, effective October 1, 1995. The information collection packages that may be included in this notice are for new information collections, approval of existing information collections, revisions to OMB-approved information collections, and extensions (no change) of OMB-approved information collections. SSA is soliciting comments on the accuracy of the agency's burden estimate; the need for the information; its practical utility; ways to enhance its quality, utility, and clarity; and on ways to minimize burden on respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Written comments and recommendations regarding the information collection(s) should be submitted to the OMB Desk Officer and the SSA Reports Clearance Officer. The information can be mailed and/or faxed to the individuals at the addresses and fax numbers listed below: (OMB), Office of Management and Budget, Attn: Desk Officer for SSA. Fax: 202-395-6974. (SSA), Social Security Administration, DCFAM, Attn: Reports Clearance Officer, 1333 Annex Building, 6401 Security Blvd., Baltimore, MD 21235. Fax: 410-965-6400. I. The information collections listed below are pending at SSA and will be submitted to OMB within 60 days from the date of this notice. Therefore, your comments should be submitted to SSA within 60 days from the date of this publication. You can obtain copies of the collection instruments by calling the SSA Reports Clearance Officer at 410-965-0454 or by writing to the address listed above. 1. Letter to Employer Requesting Wage Information—20 CFR 404.726—0960-0138. The information collected on Form SSA-L4201 is used by SSA to collect wage information from employers to establish and/or verify wage information for Supplemental Security Income

(SSI)claimants and beneficiaries. Form SSA-L4201 is also used to determine eligibility and proper payment for SSI applicants/recipients. The respondents are employers of applicants and recipients of SSI payments. *Type of Request:* Revision of an OMB-approved information collection. *Number of Respondents:* 133,000. *Frequency of Response:* 1. *Average Burden Per Response:* 30 minutes. *Estimated Annual Burden:* 66,500 hours. II. The information collections listed below have been submitted to OMB for clearance. Your comments on the information collections would be most useful if received by OMB and SSA within 30 days from the date of this publication. You can obtain a copy of the OMB clearance packages by calling the SSA Reports Clearance Officer at 410-965-0454, or by writing to the address listed above. 1. Workers' Compensation/Public Disability Questionnaire—20 CFR 404.408-0960-0247. Section 224 of the Social Security Act provides for the reduction of disability insurance benefits

(DIB)when the combination of DIB and any workers' compensation

(WC)and/or certain Federal, State or local public disability benefits

(PDB)exceeds 80% of the worker's predisability earnings. Form SSA-546 is used to collect the data necessary to determine whether or not the worker's receipt of WC/PDB payments will cause a reduction of DIB. The respondents are applicants for the Title II DIB. *Type of Request:* Extension of an OMB-approved information collection. *Number of Respondents:* 100,000. *Frequency of Response:* 1. *Average Burden Per Response:* 15 minutes. *Estimated Annual Burden:* 25,000 hours. 2. Medicaid Use Report—20 CFR 416.268-0960-0267. The information required by this regulation is used by SSA to determine if an individual is entitled to special Title XVI Supplemental Security Income

(SSI)payments and, consequently, to Medicaid benefits. The Respondents are SSI recipients whose payments were stopped based on earnings. *Type of Request:* Extension of an OMB-approved information collection. *Number of Respondents:* 60,000. *Frequency of Response:* 1. *Average Burden Per Response:* 3 minutes. *Estimated Annual Burden:* 3,000 hours. 6. Supplemental Security System

(SSI)Claim Information Notice—20 CFR 416.210-0960-0324. Form SSA-L8050-U3 is used by SSA to ensure that all sources of potential income that can be used to provide for an SSI beneficiary's own support and maintenance are utilized. SSI is intended to supplement other income an individual has available. Respondents are businesses and applicants/recipients of SSI who may be eligible for benefits from public or private programs. *Type of Request:* Extension of an OMB-approved information collection. *Number of Respondents:* 7,500. *Frequency of Response:* 1. *Average Burden Per Response:* 10 minutes. *Estimated Annual Burden:* 1,250 hours. 7. Certification of Low Birth Weight for SSI Eligibility—20 CFR 416.931, 416.926a (m)(7) &

(8)and 416.924-0960-NEW. Form SSA-3830 is designed to assist hospitals and claimants who file on behalf of low birth weight infants in providing local field offices

(FOs)and Disability Determination Services

(DDSs)with medical information for determining disability of low birth weight infants. FOs use the forms as protective filing statements, and the medical information for making presumptive disability findings, which allow expedited payment to eligible claimants. DDSs use the medical information to formally determine disability and to establish the most appropriate continuing disability review diaries. The respondents are hospitals that have information identifying low birth weight babies and medical conditions those babies may have. We estimate it will take 10 to 15 minutes to complete the form. Below, we use the higher number for our public burden computation. *Type of Request:* New information collection. *Number of Respondents:* 24,000. *Frequency of Response:* 1. *Average Burden Per Response:* 15 minutes. *Estimated Annual Burden:* 6,000 hours. 8. Reporting Changes That Affect Your Social Security Payment—20 CFR 404.301-305, .310-311, .330-.333, .335-.341, .350-.352, .370-.371, .401-.402, .408(a), .421-.425, .428-.430, .434-.437, .439-.441, .446-.447, .450-.455, .468—0960-0073. SSA uses the information collected on Form SSA-1425 to determine continuing entitlement to Title II Social Security benefits and to determine the proper benefit amount. The respondents are Social Security beneficiaries receiving SSA retirement, disability or survivor's auxiliary benefits who need to report an event that could affect payments. *Type of Request:* Extension of an OMB-approved information collection. *Number of Respondents:* 70,000. *Frequency of Response:* 1. *Average Burden Per Response:* 5 minutes. *Estimated Annual Burden:* 5,833 hours. 9. National Employment Activity and Disability Survey—0960-0666. *Background:* The Ticket to Work

(TTW)program was established by the Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Improvement Act of 1999. The program will provide eligible Social Security Disability Insurance

(SSDI)and SSI disability beneficiaries with a Ticket, which can be used to obtain vocational rehabilitation

(VR)or employment services through participating providers, called Employment Networks (ENs). The goal of the TTW program is to assist participants in returning to work at a level above the Substantial Gainful Activity

(SGA)level. The program is expected to increase beneficiary demand for employment-related services and activities. It is also expected to increase the number and diversity of providers in response to the less restrictive participation requirements and increased consumer demand for services. *The National Employment Activity and Disability Survey:* The National Employment Activity and Disability Survey will collect data on the work-related activities of SSI and SSDI beneficiaries as the TTW program, and other initiatives designed to improve beneficiary employment outcomes, are implemented. The TTW Survey is specifically designed to be a significant resource for the formal evaluation of TTW, but SSA anticipates that the survey will provide useful information for a variety of evaluation and policy analysis purposes, especially related to current efforts that attempt to improve return to work. The survey questionnaire focuses on information about beneficiaries and their work-related activities that cannot be obtained from SSA's administrative records. The survey will provide information about:

(1)Beneficiaries who assign their Tickets to ENs, and their experience in the program;

(2)beneficiaries who do not assign their Tickets, and the reasons why they do not, including involuntary non-participants;

(3)the employment outcomes of Ticket users and other beneficiaries; and

(4)the use of employment services by Ticket users and other beneficiaries. The respondents will be selected from SSI and SSDI disabled beneficiaries who meet the Ticket to Work program eligibility requirements. *Type of Request:* Extension of an OMB-approved information collection. Beneficiary Survey Data Collection Survey activity Respondents Frequency of response Average time (minutes) Total burden hours National Beneficiary Sample 2,400 45 1,800 TTW Participant Sample (Baseline) 2,000 55 1,833 TTW Participant Sample (Follow-up) 1,772 45 1,329 Total for Survey Data 6,172 4,962 Service Provider Qualitative Collection Site Visits 10 6 60 Focus Groups 12 40 480 Phone Interviews 130 2 260 Total for Qualitative Data 152 800 Total Burden Hours for all Collection Activities 5,762 Dated: February 14, 2006. Elizabeth A. Davidson, Reports Clearance Officer, Social Security Administration. [FR Doc. E6-2397 Filed 2-17-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4191-02-P DEPARTMENT OF STATE [Public Notice 5314] Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition Determinations: “Tempo! Tempo!: The Bauhaus Photomontages of Marianne Brandt” SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, *et seq.* ; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, *et seq.* ), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Tempo! Tempo!: The Bauhaus Photomontages of Marianne Brandt,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Busch-Reising Museum at Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, from on or about March 11, 2006, until on or about May 21, 2006, and at the International Canter for Photography, New York, NY, from on or about June 9, 2006, until on or about August 27, 2006, and at possible additional venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the **Federal Register** . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul Manning, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/453-8052). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW. Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001. Dated: February 10, 2006. C. Miller Crouch, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. [FR Doc. E6-2412 Filed 2-17-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4710-05-P DEPARTMENT OF STATE [Public Notice 5317] State-14 Foreign Service Institute Records SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Department of State proposes to alter an existing system of records, STATE-14, pursuant to the Provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended (5 U.S.C.(r)), and the Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A-130, Appendix I. The Department's report was filed with the Office of Management and Budget on February 9, 2006. It is proposed that the current system will retain the name “Foreign Service Institute Records.” It is also proposed that due to the expanded scope of the current system, the altered system description will include revisions and/or additions to the following sections: System Location; Categories of Individuals Covered by the System; Authority for Maintenance of the System; and Routine Uses of Records Maintained in the System, Including Categories of Users and Purposes of such Uses. Changes to the existing system description are proposed in order to reflect more accurately the Foreign Service Institute's record-keeping system, the Authority establishing its existence and responsibilities, and the uses and users of the system. Any persons interested in commenting on the altered system of records may do so by submitting comments in writing to Margaret P. Grafeld, Director; Office of Information Programs and Services; A/RPS/IPS; Department of State, SA-2; Washington, DC 20522-8100. This system of records will be effective 40 days from the date of publication, unless we receive comments that will result in a contrary determination. The altered system description, “Foreign Service Institute Records,” will read as set forth below. Dated: February 8, 2006. Frank Coulter, Acting Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of Administration, Department of State. STATE-14 SYSTEM NAME: Foreign Service Institute Records. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION: Unclassified. SYSTEM LOCATION: The George P. Shultz National Foreign Affairs Training Center, 4000 Arlington Boulevard, Arlington, VA; Warrenton Training Center, Warrenton, VA; Tunis Field School, American Embassy Tunis, Tunisia; Yokohama Field School, American Embassy Tokyo, Japan; and Seoul Field School, American Embassy Seoul, Korea. CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE SYSTEM: Persons who requested and/or received training from the Foreign Service Institute, took a language proficiency test given by the Foreign Service Institute, or received external training (including at colleges and universities) sponsored or approved by the Institute including:

(1)Employees (and eligible family members thereof) of the Department of State;

(2)employees (and eligible family members thereof) of other agencies of the Federal executive, legislative and judicial branches;

(3)members (and eligible family members thereof) of the U.S. military;

(4)citizens or nationals of the United States, or employees of any corporation, company, partnership, association or other legal entity that is 50 percent or more beneficially owned by citizens or nationals of the United States, that is engaged in business abroad, as well as any family member of such individuals;

(5)citizens or nationals of the United States, or employees of any corporation, company, partnership, association or other legal entity that is 50 percent or more beneficially owned by citizens or nationals of the United States, under contract to provide services to the United States Government or to any employee thereof that is performing such services; and

(6)applicants for employment at the Department of State. AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM: 5 U.S.C. 301 (Management of Executive Agencies); 22 U.S.C. 4021-4028 (Chapter 7 of the Foreign Service Act of 1980). CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM: Training request forms and supporting documentation; progress reports; evaluation reports; course grades and/or test scores; general correspondence; biographic information; educational and employment history; security clearance data; travel vouchers; fiscal, *i.e.* , payment or billing, information. ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS AND PURPOSES OF SUCH USES: The information in this system is used to document assignments to training and students' progress, and for operation of the training program. The principal users of this information outside the Department are:

(1)Other agencies of the legislative, executive and judicial branches that send students to the Institute for training;

(2)non-Federal organizations that send students to the Institute for training;

(3)universities to whom the Institute sends students for training; and

(4)other training vendors to whom the Institute sends students for training.” Also see “Routine Uses” paragraph of the Prefatory Statement published in the **Federal Register** . POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORING, RETRIEVING, ACCESSING, RETAINING AND DISPOSING OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM: STORAGE: Electronic media; hard copy. RETRIEVABILITY: Individual name, Social Security Number. SAFEGUARDS: All employees of the Department of State have undergone a thorough personnel security background investigation. Access to the Department of State building and the annexes is controlled by security guards, and admission is limited to those individuals possessing a valid identification card or individuals under proper escort. All records containing personal information are maintained in secured filing cabinets or in restricted areas, access to which is limited to authorized personnel. Access to electronic files is password-protected and under the direct supervision of the system manager. The system manager has the capability of printing audit trails of access from the computer media, thereby permitting regular and ad hoc monitoring of computer usage. RETENTION AND DISPOSAL: These records will be maintained until they become inactive, at which time they will be destroyed or retired in accordance with published record disposition schedules of the Department of State and as approved by the National Archives and Records Administration. More specific information may be obtained by writing to the Director, Office of Information Programs and Services, A/RPS/IPS, SA-2, Department of State, Washington, DC 20522-8100. SYSTEM MANAGER AND ADDRESS: Executive Director for Management, Foreign Service Institute, George P. Shultz National Foreign Affairs Training Center, Room F-2205, Washington, DC 20522-4201. NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE: Individuals who have reason to believe that the Foreign Service Institute might have records pertaining to them should write to the Director, Office of Information Programs and Services, A/RPS/IPS, SA-2, Department of State, Washington, DC 20522-8100. The individual must specify that he or she wishes the records of the Foreign Service Institute to be checked. At a minimum, the individual should include: name; date and place of birth; Social Security Number; current mailing address and zip code; signature; a brief description of the circumstances that caused the creation of the record (including the city and/or country and the approximate dates) which gives the individual cause to believe that the Foreign Service Institute has records pertaining to him or her. RECORD ACCESS AND AMENDMENT PROCEDURES: Individuals who wish to gain access to or to amend records pertaining to themselves should write to the Director, Office of Information Programs and Services (address above). RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES: These records contain information that is primarily obtained from the individual who is the subject of the records. SYSTEMS EXEMPTED FROM CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE ACT: Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(6) records in this system of records may be exempted from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3).(d).(e)(l).(e)(4)(G).(H). and

(I)and (f). [FR Doc. 06-1624 Filed 2-17-06; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 19

Traces to 19 documents

CFR