Proposed Rules. Notice of availability; request for comments

4,516 words·~21 min read·/register/2006/02/16/06-1464

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4310-55-P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 50 CFR Part 228 [I.D. 020806A] Taking of Cook Inlet, Alaska Beluga Whales by Alaska Natives AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments. SUMMARY: The Marine Mammal Protection Act

(MMPA)allows NMFS to regulate the subsistence harvest of marine mammals by Alaska Natives when the affected stock of marine mammals is depleted and after the opportunity for a formal hearing on the proposed regulations. After designating the Cook Inlet stock of beluga whales as depleted, NMFS proposed regulations to limit the subsistence harvest from this stock. In December 2000, a formal hearing was conducted on the proposed regulations. In August 2004, a second formal hearing was conducted on proposed long term harvest regulations from 2005 through the CI beluga whale's recovery. The Administrative Law Judge presiding in the August 2004 hearings submitted his recommended decision to the Assistant Administrator for Fisheries

(AA)on November 8, 2005. The Judge's recommended decision is available for public review, and NMFS solicits comments on his recommendations. DATES: Comments must be received by March 8, 2006 ADDRESSES: Copies of the recommended decision may be reviewed and/or copied at the NMFS, Protected Resource Division, 222 West 7th Ave. Room 517, Anchorage, AK 99512; or at the Alaska Regional Office, Protected Resource Division, 709 W 9th St. Room 420, Juneau, AK, 99802. The recommended decision is also available on the Internet (see Electronic Access). Copies of the recommended decision and the entire record of the hearing may be reviewed and/or copied at the Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910. Send comments to Kaja Brix, Assistant Regional Administrator, Protected Resources Division, Alaska Region, NMFS, Attn: Lori Durall. Comments may be submitted by: • Mail: PO Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802 • Hand delivery: 709 West 9th Street, Room 420A, Juneau, AK • Fax: 907-586-7557 • E-mail: *CIB-MMPA-ALJ-recommended-decision@noaa.gov* . Please identify electronic comments with the header: CI Beluga ALJ decision. E-mail comments, with or without attachments, are limited to five

(5)megabytes. • Webform at the Federal eRulemaking Portal: *www.regulations.gov* . Follow the instructions at that site for submitting comments. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Mahoney, NMFS Alaska Region, Anchorage Field Office,

(907)271-5006; or Kaja Brix, NMFS, Alaska Region,

(907)586-7235. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Electronic Access The recommended decision, proposed regulations, and other documents related to the administrative hearing and recovery effort are available on the Internet at the following address: *http://www.fakr.noaa.gov/protectedresources/whales/beluga.htm* . Background NMFS initially proposed regulations limiting the subsistence harvest of beluga whales in Cook Inlet, AK on October 4, 2000 (65 FR 59164). The proposed rule's objectives are to recover the depleted stock of Cook Inlet beluga whales to its optimum sustainable population level while preserving the traditional subsistence use of the marine mammals by Alaska Natives. Pursuant to Section 101(b)

(3)and section 103(d) of the MMPA, an administrative hearing was held prior to regulations being prescribed to limit the subsistence harvest of marine mammals by Alaska Natives. Judge Parlen L. McKenna convened hearings on the proposed rule in December 2000 and August 2004, in Anchorage, AK. On November 8, 2005, Judge McKenna submitted his recommended decision to the AA for the proposed regulation governing the taking of Cook Inlet, Alaska, beluga whales by Alaska Natives. Federal regulations (50 CFR 228.20) require the AA to make the recommended decision available for public review and comment for a 20-day period. Following the 20-day comment period, the AA must make a final decision on the proposed regulations, which must include the following:

(1)A statement containing a description of the history of the proceeding;

(2)Findings on the issues of fact with the reasons therefor; and

(3)Rulings on issues of law. The AA's final decision may affirm, modify, or set aside, in whole or in part, the recommended findings, conclusions and decision of the hearing's presiding officer. The AA's decision must be published in the **Federal Register** and final regulations shall be promulgated with the decision. In accordance with the administrative regulations, NMFS solicits public comments on Judge McKenna's recommended decision. Dated: February 10, 2006. James H. Lecky, Director, Office of Protected Resources,National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. E6-2196 Filed 2-15-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-22-S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 50 CFR Part 679 [Docket No. 060201022-6022-01; I.D. 012606A] RIN 0648-AU16 Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Control Date for Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Pacific Cod Fishery AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking; consideration of control date. SUMMARY: This document announces that anyone entering the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands

(BSAI)Pacific cod fishery after December 11, 2005 (control date), will not be assured of future access to the Pacific cod resource if a management regime is developed and implemented that limits the number of participants, licenses or vessels in the fishery. This announcement is necessary for public awareness of a potential eligibility criterion for access with commercial fishing gear to the BSAI Pacific cod resource. This announcement does not prevent any other date for eligibility in the fishery or another method of controlling fishing effort from being proposed and implemented. The intended effect of this announcement is to discourage new entry into the fishery based on speculation while discussions continue on whether and how access to the Pacific cod resource should be limited. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Hartman, 907-586-7442, or *jeff.hartman@noaa.gov* . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 11, 2005 the North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) recommended that NMFS provide a notice to the public that a control date of December 11, 2005, for participation in the BSAI Pacific cod fishery be set. The purpose of this notice is to inform the public that participation in the BSAI Pacific cod commercial fishery after this date may not count for consideration of an allocation or eligibility to fish for Pacific cod. The BSAI Pacific cod fishery is managed pursuant to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area (FMP). The total allowable catch

(TAC)for BSAI Pacific cod currently is allocated among trawl, fixed, and jig gear sectors at 50 CFR 679.20(a)(7). The Council is developing a proposed amendment to the FMP (Amendment 85) that would further divide and refine these allocations. During the development of this amendment, the Council became aware that new entrants into some sectors of the Pacific cod fishery would exacerbate competition for increasingly smaller sector allocations under Amendment 85. In October 2005, the Council developed a problem statement for Amendment 85 identifying that: Participants in the BSAI Pacific cod fishery who have made significant investments and have a long-term dependence on the resource need stability in the allocations to the trawl, jig, fixed gear, and CDQ [Community Development Quota] sectors. To reduce uncertainty and provide stability for these participants, allocations should be adjusted to better reflect historic use by sector. The basis for determining sector allocations will be catch history as well as consideration of socio-economic and community factors. As other fisheries in the BSAI and GOA [Gulf of Alaska] are incrementally rationalized, historical participants in the BSAI Pacific cod fishery may be put at a disadvantage. Each sector in the BSAI Pacific cod fishery currently has different degrees of license requirements and levels of participation. Allocations to the sector level are a necessary step on the path towards comprehensive rationalization. Prompt action is needed to maintain stability in the BSAI Pacific cod fisheries. In October 2005, the public testified to the Council that new entry into the Pacific cod fishery likely would erode the Pacific cod allocations and associated prohibited species catch amounts available to long-term participants, especially under proposed Amendment 85. On December 11, 2005, the Council recommended that NMFS provide a notice to the public that a control date of December 11, 2005, be set for participation in the BSAI Pacific cod fishery. This notice informs the public that participation in the BSAI Pacific cod commercial fishery after this date may not be considered by the Council for purposes of any future limited entry program developed for this fishery. NMFS and the Council intend, in making this announcement, to discourage speculative entry into the Pacific cod fishery while potential entry or access control management regimes are considered by the Council. If the Council decides to develop an access or entry control regime, some fishermen who do not currently fish for Pacific cod in the BSAI and never have done so may decide to enter the fishery for the sole purpose of establishing a record of making commercial landings of this species. A record of making commercial landings generally is considered indicative of economic dependence on a fishery. On this basis, a new entrant may successfully claim access to a fishery that otherwise is limited to traditional participants. New entrants may have to buy the fishing history or a permit from an earlier participant. Hence, initial access to the fishery at little or no entry cost may result in a transfer of wealth to entities with little investment in a fishery and away from those that have substantial investment in the fishery as indicated by their fishing history. Any anticipated increase in the security of an allocation also may encourage speculative entry, which is associated with a rapid and wasteful increase in fishing effort in fisheries already fully or over-exploited. Specification of a control date may communicate helpful investment and operational information to businesses considering entry to a fishery, or those currently operating in a fishery. This action does not commit the Council or Secretary to a particular management regime or criterion for entry to the Pacific cod fishery. Fishermen are not guaranteed future participation in the fishery before or after the control date. The Council may choose a different control date, or it may choose a management regime that does not make use of such a date. The Council may choose to give variably weighted consideration to fishermen in the fishery before and after the control date. The Council may choose also to take no further action to control entry or access to the fishery. Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 *et seq.* Dated: February 13, 2006. John Oliver, Deputy Assistant Administrator for Operations, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. E6-2231 Filed 2-15-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-22-S 71 32 Thursday, February 16, 2006 Notices DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request February 10, 2006. The Department of Agriculture has submitted the following information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Comments regarding

(a)Whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility;

(b)the accuracy of the agency's estimate of burden including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;

(c)ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected;

(d)ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology should be addressed to: Desk Officer for Agriculture, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), *OIRA_Submission@OMB.EOP.GOV* or fax

(202)395-5806 and to Departmental Clearance Office, USDA, OCIO, Mail Stop 7602, Washington, DC 20250-7602. Comments regarding these information collections are best assured of having their full effect if received within 30 days of this notification. Copies of the submission(s) may be obtained by calling

(202)720-8681. An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a currently valid OMB control number and the agency informs potential persons who are to respond to the collection of information that such persons are not required to respond to the collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Foreign Agricultural Service *Title:* CCC's Export Credit Guarantee Program (GSA-102) and Supplier Credit Guarantee Program (SCGP). *OMB Control Number:* 0551-0004. *Summary of Collection:* The Commodity Credit Corporation

(CCC)of the U.S. Department of Agriculture administers 7 CFR Part 1493, the Export Credit Guarantee Program (GSM-102) and the Supplier Credit Guarantee Program (SCGP). These programs provide guarantees to exporters in order to maintain and increase overseas importers ability to purchase U.S. agricultural goods. The Export Credit Guarantee Programs are designed to stimulate U.S. private sector financing of foreign purchases of U.S. agricultural commodities on credit terms. Since the Export Credit Guarantee Programs operate off commercial sales, the majority of the information required for program participation, including the guarantee application, evidence of export report, assignment notice, and filing of notices of default. The Foreign Agricultural Service

(FAS)will collect information from the guarantee application submitted by the participants in writing (via fax or e-mail) or mail. *Need and Use of the Information:* FAS will collect information from participating U.S. exporters in order to determine the exporters eligibility for program benefits. The information is also used in fulfilling CCC obligation under the issued payment guarantee. If the information were not collected CCC would be unable to determine if export sales under the programs would be eligible for coverage or, if coverage conformed to program requirements. *Description of Respondents:* Business or other for-profit. *Number of Respondents:* 298. *Frequency of Responses:* Record keeping, Reporting: On occasion. *Total Burden Hours:* 8,458. Ruth Brown, Departmental Information Collection Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. E6-2192 Filed 2-15-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410-10-P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Food and Nutrition Service Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request: Request for Administrative Review AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service, USDA. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Food and Nutrition Service

(FNS)invites comments on this information collection for which FNS intends to request approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The proposed collection is a revision of a currently approved collection. DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before April 17, 2006. ADDRESSES: Comments are invited on

(a)Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information has practical utility;

(b)the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions that were used;

(c)ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and

(d)ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments may be sent to Courtney L. Wilkerson, Chief, Administrative Review Branch, Benefit Redemption Division, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, 3101 Park Center Drive, Room 608, Alexandria, Virginia 22302. Comments may also be faxed to the attention of Mr. Wilkerson at

(703)305-2820, or e-mailed to *Courtney.Wilkerson@fns.usda.gov.* All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will also be a matter of public record. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Request for additional information or copies of the information collection form and instructions should be directed to Courtney L. Wilkerson on

(703)305-2820. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: *Title:* Request for Administrative Review. *OMB Number:* 0584-0520. *Expiration Date:* April 30, 2006. *Type of Request:* Revision of a currently approved collection of information. *Abstract:* The Food and Nutrition Service

(FNS)of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is the Federal agency responsible for administering the Food Stamp Program. The Food Stamp Act of 1977, as amended, (7 U.S.C. 2011-2036) requires that the FNS determine the eligibility of retail food stores and certain food service organizations who apply to participate in the Food Stamp Program. If a food retailer or wholesale food concern is aggrieved by certain administrative action by FNS, that store has the right to file a written request for review of the administrative action with FNS. The information collection burden for retail food stores and certain food service organizations has slightly increased over the past three fiscal years. The number of respondents reported in the previously approved collection was based on a collective total of three consecutive fiscal years (FY 2001-2003). In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this notice reflects an estimated total annual burden on respondents based solely on fiscal year 2005 data. Therefore, while the previously approved collection reflects 1,140 as the total number of respondents for fiscal years 2001-2003, this notice accurately reflects 652 respondents for fiscal year 2005, a slight annual increase over the last three fiscal years. *Estimate of Burden:* The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 0.17 an hour per response. *Respondents:* Retail food stores and wholesale food concerns. *Estimated Number of Respondents:* 652. *Number of Responses per Respondent:* 1.2. *Estimated Time per Response:* 0.17 minutes. *Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents:* 133 hours. Dated: February 3, 2006. Roberto Salazar, Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service. [FR Doc. E6-2230 Filed 2-15-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410-30-P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service Information Collection; Request for Comments; Urgent Removal of Timber AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Forest Service is seeking comments from all interested individuals and organizations on the extension of an information collection associated with timber sale contract term extensions for urgent removal of salvage timber from other than National Forest system lands. Regulations at 36 CFR 223.53 allow timber sale purchasers to ask for extensions of certain National Forest timber sale contracts when the manufacturing facilities or logging equipment capacity available to purchasers are insufficient to provide for both the rapid harvest of damaged non-National Forest System timber in need of expeditious removal and the continued harvest of undamaged (green) timber under contract with the Forest Service. When requesting an urgent removal extension purchasers are required to provide documentation supporting the need. The collected information is necessary for the contracting officer to make a determination whether the purchaser meets the conditions for receiving an urgent removal extension on one or more National Forest System timber sale contracts. DATES: Comments must be received in writing on or before April 17, 2006 to be assured of consideration. Comments received after that date will be considered to the extent practicable. ADDRESSES: Comments concerning this notice should be addressed to Director, Forest Management, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Mail Stop 1103, Washington, DC 20250-0003. Comments also may be submitted via facsimile to

(202)205-1045 or by e-mail to: *urgentremoval@fs.fed.us* . In addition, comments may be submitted via the World Wide Web/Internet Web site at: *http://www.regulations.gov* . All comments, including names and addresses when provided, are placed in the record and are available for public inspection and copying. Conditions that must be met for obtaining an Urgent Removal Contract Term Extension are detailed in Title 36 of the Code of Federal Regulations, section 223.53, and can be viewed on the World Wide Web/Internet site at: *http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_05/36cfr223_05.html* . Alternatively, these can be viewed in the Office of the Director, Forest Management, Third Floor, Southwest Wing, Yates Building, 201 14th Street, SW., Washington, DC. Visitors are encouraged to call ahead at

(202)205-1496 to facilitate entry into the building. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lathrop Smith, Forest Management Staff, at

(202)205-0858, or Richard Fitzgerald, Forest Management Staff, at

(202)205-1753. Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf

(TDD)may call the Federal Relay Service

(FRS)at 1-800-877-8339 twenty-four hours a day, every day of the year, including holidays. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: *Title:* Urgent Removal of Timber. *OMB Number:* 0596-0167. *Expiration Date of Approval:* June 30, 2006. *Type of Request:* Extension of currently approved collection. *Abstract:* In order to facilitate the expeditious removal of timber in other ownerships damaged by catastrophic events beyond the landowner's control, the Forest Service promulgated a final rule at § 223.53 of Title 36 of the Code of Federal Regulations on January 2, 2004 (69 FR 29). Periodically, catastrophic events such as severe drought conditions, insect and disease outbreaks, wildfires, floods, and windthrow occur on forested lands within, or near, NFS lands. As a result of such catastrophic events, substantial amounts of private and other public timber may be severely damaged. This damaged timber must be harvested within a relatively short time period to avoid substantial losses due to deterioration in both the quantity and quality of the timber. The critical time period for harvesting this damaged timber and avoiding substantial deterioration varies with the season of the year, the species of timber, the damaging agent, and the location of the damaged timber. In most cases, substantial deterioration can be avoided if the damaged timber is harvested within 1 year of the catastrophic event. The number of wildfires, and the extent of damage to public and private forested land experienced in recent years resulted in the Forest Service adjusting its contracting procedures to support the urgent removal of damaged timber on non-NFS lands. This information collection provides data to permit the discretionary extension of certain National Forest System timber sale contracts by the Contracting Officer. Such extensions will allow purchasers to divert resources to harvesting damaged timber, located on private or non-NFS public lands, which is in need of urgent removal. Catastrophic events which may result in the need for urgent removal of damaged timber include, but are not limited to, fire, flood, insect and disease infestations, drought, and windthrow. The intended effects of this information collection is to assure that extensions of the time allowed to harvest National Forest System timber sale contracts are consistent with the requirements of the National Forest Management Act (16 U.S.C. 472a), while minimizing the loss of National Forest System timber adjacent to other timber infested with insects and disease or damaged by fire; reduce the threat to public safety and property resulting from such catastrophic events; and promote the wise use and conservation of the natural resources. The National Forest Management Act (16 U.S.C. 472a) requires that extensions of contract time shall not be granted unless “the purchaser has diligently performed in accordance with an approved plan of operation or that the substantial overriding public interest justifies the extension.” Regulations at 36 CFR 223.115 mirror the National Forest Management Act. Regulations at 36 CFR 223.53(b) require the Regional Forester to verify in writing that:

(1)A specific catastrophe occurred for which urgent removal extensions should be granted; and

(2)Failure to harvest the damaged non-National Forest System timber promptly could result in the following:

(i)Pose a threat to public safety,

(ii)Create a threat of an insect or disease epidemic to National Forest System or other lands or resources, or

(iii)Significant private or other public resource loss. Following such a determination, to obtain an urgent removal extension on a National Forest System timber sale contract, a purchaser must make a written request to the contracting officer which includes the following:

(1)An explanation of why the harvest of undamaged (green) National Forest System timber within the term of the existing National Forest System contract(s) will prevent or otherwise impede the removal of damaged non-National Forest System timber in need of expeditious removal; and

(2)Documentation that the manufacturing facilities or logging equipment capacity available to the purchaser would be insufficient to provide for both the rapid salvage of damaged non-National Forest System timber in need of expeditious removal and continued harvest of undamaged (green) National Forest System timber under contract with the Forest Service. The contracting officer must obtain the information provided by the purchaser to verify that there is a legitimate need to grant the request for urgent removal extension(s) in accordance with the regulations at 36 CFR 223.53. Information will be collected in writing. Electronic technology is not appropriate for collecting site-specific, one-time information. Facsimile extension applications are acceptable. Each request for an urgent removal extension is unique. There is no duplication of information and the information is only available from the timber sale purchaser. Only the minimum amount of information required to make the contracting officer's determination is collected. The Forest Service cannot assure that it meets its statutory requirements in the National Forest Management Act for extending timber sale contracts if the information collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently. *Estimate of Annual Burden:* The public reporting burden to provide information when requesting a timber sale contract urgent removal extension is estimated to average 6 hours per response. *Type of Respondents:* Individuals, large and small businesses, and corporations purchasing National Forest System timber sales. *Estimated Annual Number of Respondents:* 25. *Estimated Annual Number of Responses per Respondent:* 1 per year. *Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents:* 150 hours. Comment is Invited Comment is invited on:

(1)Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the stated purposes and the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical or scientific utility;

(2)the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;

(3)ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and

(4)ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology. All comments received in response to this notice, including names and addresses when provided, will become a matter of public record. Comments will be summarized and included in the request for Office of Management and Budget approval. Dated: February 1, 2006. Frederick Norbury, Associate Deputy Chief, NFS. [FR Doc. E6-2281 Filed 2-15-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410-11-P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service Notice of Sanders County Resource Advisory Committee Meeting AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. ACTION: Notice of meeting SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393) the Lolo and Kootenai National Forests' Sanders County Resource Advisory Committee will meet on February 16 at 7 p.m. in Thompson Falls, Montana for a business meeting. The meeting is open to the public. DATES: February 16, 2006. ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Thompson Falls Courthouse, 1111 Main Street, Thompson Falls, MT 59873. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randy Hojem, Designated Federal Official (DFO), District Ranger, Plains Ranger District, Lolo National Forest at

(406)826-3821. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda topics include reviewing progress on current RAC projects, and receiving public comment. If the meeting location is changed, notice will be posted in the local newspapers, including the Clark Fork Valley Press, and Sanders County Ledger. Dated: February 6, 2006. Randy Hojem, DFO, Plains Ranger District, Lolo National Forest. [FR Doc. 06-1464 Filed 2-15-06; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 4

Traces to 4 documents

U.S. Code

CFR

10 references not yet in our index