Notices. Notice of meeting
4,525 words·~21 min read·
/register/2006/02/03/06-1003A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service Meeting of the Land Between the Lakes Advisory Board AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. ACTION: Notice of meeting. SUMMARY: The Land Between the Lakes Advisory Board will hold a meeting on Tuesday, February 28, 2006. Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2. The meeting agenda includes the following:
(1)Welcome/Introductions/Agenda.
(2)Appreciative Inquiry Session about LBL/Environmental Education.
(3)Land and Resource Management Plan.
(4)LBL Updates.
(5)Board Discussion of Comments Received. The meeting is open to the public. Written comments are invited and may be mailed to: William P. Lisowsky, Area Supervisor, Land Between the Lakes, 100 Van Morgan Drive, Golden Pond, Kentucky 42211. Written comments must be received at Land Between the Lakes by February 20, 2006, in order for copies to be provided to the members at the meeting. Board members will review written comments received, and at their request, oral clarification may be requested at a future meeting. DATE: The meeting will be held on February 28, 2006, 9 a.m. to 3 p.m., CST. ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Stewart County Public Library, Dover, TN, and will be open to the public. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon Byers, Advisory Board Liaison, Land Between the Lakes, 100 Van Morgan Drive, Golden Pond, Kentucky 42211, 270-924-2002. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None. Dated: January 20, 2006. William P. Lisowsky, Area Supervisor, Land Between the Lakes. 1 [FR Doc. E6-1469 Filed 2-2-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410-11-P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service Manti-La Sal National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan Revision Manti-La Sal National Forest in Utah, Juab, Emery, Carbon, Sanpete, Grand, San Juan and Sevier counties in Utah, and Mesa and Montrose counties in Colorado. AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. ACTION: Notice of Adjustment to **Federal Register** Notice Vol. 67, No. 86, p. 22397, May 3, 2002, and Vol. 69, No. 205, p. 62244, October 25, 2004, and transition to the 2005 Planning Rule at 36 CFR 219 (FR, Vol. 70, No. 3. / January 5, 2005, 1023). SUMMARY: The Manti-La Sal National Forest (Forest) will exercise its option to adjust the land management plan revision process from compliance with the 1982 planning regulations, to conform to new planning regulations adopted in January 2005. This adjustment will have the following effects: 1. The 2005 Planning Rule redefines forest plans to be more strategic and flexible to better facilitate adaptive management and public collaboration. 2. The 2005 Planning Rule focuses more on the goals of ecological, social, and economic sustainability and less on prescriptive means of producing goods and services. 3. The Responsible Official who will approve the final plan will be the Forest Supervisor instead of the Regional Forester. 4. The Forest will establish an Environmental Management System
(EMS)(per ISO 14001:2004(E)) prior to approval of the revised forest plan. 5. The emphasis of public involvement will be a collaborative effort between the public and the Forest Service to incorporate the most desirable management options into a single broadly supported management direction package that will become the forest plan. 6. Administrative review will change from a post-decision appeals process to a pre-decision objection process. 7. Because the Forest will not be preparing an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS)for revision of the forest plan, interim management strategies will be developed for the fourteen river segments identified as eligible for inclusion in the Wild and Scenic River
(WSR)System. The suitability of these river segments for inclusion in the WSR System will be addressed in an appropriate environmental document after the revised forest plan is approved. 8. Because an environmental impact statement will not be prepared for this revision, oil and gas leasing decisions will not be made. Instead, the revised forest plan will include general guidelines for mineral operations, including oil and gas, which will be considered as appropriate for areas currently available for leasing to protect resource values while providing appropriate access for exploration and development activities. Decisions regarding areas administratively available for lease and lease stipulations will be addressed in a separate environmental document(s) prepared either concurrently with the revision process or following approval of the revised forest plan. *Public Involvement:* Public participation and collaboration (including more than 34 public meetings) has been ongoing. Current information and details of public participation opportunities are posted on the Forest Web site at *http://www.fs.fed.us/r4/mantilasal/projects.* Contact Linda Crawley at
(435)636-3558, or e-mail *lcrawley@fs.fed.us* to be added to the forest plan revision mailing list. ADDRESSES: Manti-La Sal National Forest, 599 W. Price River Dr., Price, UT 84501. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marlene DePietro, Planning and Recreation Group Leader, Manti-La Sal National Forest, phone
(435)636-3539 or email: *mdepietro@fs.fed.us.* DATES: Transition is effective immediately upon publication of this notice in the **Federal Register** . *Responsible Official:* Alice B. Carlton, Forest Supervisor, Manti-La Sal National Forest, 599 W. Price River Dr., Price, UT 84501. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 3, 2002, the Manti-La Sal National Forest published a Notice of Intent to revise the Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan) (FR Vol. 67, No. 86, p. 22397, May 3, 2002). This notice initiated revision under the 1982 planning regulations, but advised the public that the Forest would seriously consider switching to the new planning regulations once they were finalized This notice also outlined the initial steps of the revision process including gathering information, organizing the revision team, developing resource inventories, and establishing a mailing list. During 2002 and 2003, cooperating agency status was established through Memorandums of Understanding with six of the ten counties within which the Forest lies. Ten meetings were held throughout central and southeastern Utah (February to March 2003) to explain the planning process and to discuss existing uses of the Forest and current management issues. Nine public meetings were held in May 2004 to discuss preliminary needs for change in the current Forest Plan, Wild and Scenic Rivers eligibility and suitability, and the inventory of undeveloped and unroaded areas. On October 25, 2004, the Forest formally initiated the land management plan revision process with release of a Preliminary Analysis of the Management Situation and publication of a Notice of Intent to prepare an environmental impact statement for plan revision (FR Vol. 69, No. 205, p. 62244). Six open houses were held during November 2004 to discuss the Preliminary Analysis of the Management Situation and the Notice of Intent. These documents focused the revision process on those areas of the Forest where clearer management direction is most needed at this time. During September 2005, two workshops and an open house were held to discuss desired conditions for the Forest. Six workshops were held during November 2005 to review current Forest inventories and discuss suitable uses on the Forest. To meet the requirements of the 2005 Planning Rule, the 2004 Analysis of the Management Situation, combined with the Forest's Rapid Assessment (March 2005), Fire Regime Condition Class Assessment (February 2005), and various resource specialist white papers will serve as the Forest's Comprehensive Evaluation Report. Additional opportunities will be provided for the public to review intermediate products, provide comment, or participate in collaborative stakeholder activities. The focal points of future collaborative work will be:
(1)Review of revised desired conditions,
(2)identification and development of objectives to aid in attaining or maintaining desired conditions,
(3)review of suitable land uses,
(4)development and review of design criteria, and
(5)development and review of the plan monitoring framework. This phase of collaboration should be completed by the spring of 2006. The remaining forest plan revision schedule will be approximately as follows: Draft Environmental Management System Spring 2006. Release of Proposed Forest Plan and start of 90-day public comment period Summer 2006. Release of Final Plan and start of 30-day objection period Fall 2006. Final decision and start of plan implementation Winter 2006. Dated: January 30, 2006. Rod Player, Acting Forest Supervisor, Manti-La Sal National Forest. [FR Doc. E6-1465 Filed 2-2-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410-11-P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Rural Utilities Service Information Collection Activity; Comment Request AGENCY: Rural Utilities Service, USDA. ACTION: Notice and request for comments. SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. chapter 35, as amended), the Rural Utilities Service
(RUS)invites comments on the following information collections for which RUS intends to request approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). DATES: Comments on this notice must be received by April 4, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard C. Annan, Director, Program Development and Regulatory Analysis, Rural Utilities Service, 1400 Independence Ave., SW., STOP 1522, Room 5818, South Building, Washington, DC 20250-1522. Telephone:
(202)720-0784. Fax:
(202)720-8435. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office of Management and Budget's
(OMB)regulation (5 CFR 1320) implementing provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13) requires that interested members of the public and affected agencies have an opportunity to comment on information collection and recordkeeping activities [see 5 CFR 1320.8(d)]. This notice identifies information collections that RUS is submitting to OMB for extension. Comments are invited on:
(a)Whether this collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility;
(b)the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the collection of information including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
(c)ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(d)ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments may be sent to Richard C. Annan, Director, Program Development and Regulatory Analysis, Rural Utilities Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, STOP 1522, 1400 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20250-1522. Fax:
(202)720-0784. *Title:* Review Rating Summary, RUS Form 300. *OMB Control Number:* 0572-0025. *Type of Request:* Extension of a currently approved collection. *Abstract:* The RUS manages loan programs in accordance with the RE Act of 1936, as amended (7 U.S.C. 901 *et seq.* ). An important part of safeguarding loan security is to see that RUS financed facilities are being responsibly used, adequately operated, and adequately maintained. Future needs have to be anticipated to ensure that facilities will continue to produce revenue and that loans will be repaid as required by the RUS mortgage. A periodic operations and maintenance (O&M) review, using the RUS Form 300, in accordance with 7 CFR part 1730, is an effective means for RUS to determine whether the borrowers systems are being properly operated and maintained, thereby protecting the loan collateral. An O&M review is also used to rate facilities and can be used for appraisals of collateral as prescribed by OMB Circular A-129, Policies for Federal Credit Programs and Non-Tax Receivables. *Estimate of Burden:* Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 4 hours per response. *Respondents:* Not-for-profit institutions. *Estimated Number of Respondents:* 229. *Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent:* 10. *Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents:* 916 hours. *Title:* Telecommunications Standards and Specifications, 7 CFR part 1755. *OMB Control Number:* 0572-0132. *Type of Request:* Extension of a currently approved collection. *Abstract:* To protect the security of loans it makes and to ensure that the telecommunications services provided to rural Americans are comparable to those offered in urban and suburban areas, RUS establishes the minimum acceptable performance criteria for materials and equipment to be employed on telecommunications systems financed by RUS. These specifications cover a variety of materials and equipment, ranging from multipair cables for direct burial to highly sophisticated computerized central office switches. Manufacturers, wishing to sell their products to RUS borrowers, request RUS consideration for acceptance of their products and submit data demonstrating their products' compliance with RUS specification. *Estimate of Burden:* Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 20 hours per response. *Respondents:* Not-for-profit institutions. *Estimated Number of Respondents:* 60. *Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent:* 1.68. *Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents:* 2020 hours. *Title:* Borrower Investments—Telecommunications Loan Program, 7 CFR Part 1744, subpart E. *OMB Control Number:* 0572-0098. *Type of Request:* Extension of a currently approved collection. *Abstract:* The Rural Economic Development Act of 1990, Title XXIII of the Farm Bill, Public Law 101-624, authorized qualified RUS borrowers to make investments in rural development projects without the prior approval of the RUS Administrator provided, however, that such investments do not cause the borrower to exceed its allowable qualified investment level as determined in accordance with the procedures set forth in 7 CFR part 1744, subpart E. When a borrower exceeds these limits, the security for the Government's loans could be in jeopardy. However, in the interest of encouraging rural development, RUS will consider approving such investments that exceed a borrower's qualified investment level. This information collection covers those items that a borrower would need to submit to RUS for consideration of the borrower's request to make such an investment. *Estimate of Burden:* Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 9.5 hours per response. *Respondents:* Not for profit institutions; business or other for-profit entities. *Estimated Number of Respondents:* 25. *Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent:* 1. *Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents:* 238 hours. *Title:* Use of Consultants Funded by Borrowers, 7 CFR part 1789. *OMB Control Number:* 0572-0115. *Type of Request:* Extension of a currently approved collection. *Abstract:* Section 18(c) of the Rural Electrification Act of 1936 (RE Act), as amended (7 U.S.C. 901 *et seq.* ) authorizes RUS to use consultants voluntarily funded by borrowers for financial, legal, engineering and other technical services. Consultants may be used to facilitate timely action on loan applications by borrowers for financial assistance and for approvals required by RUS, pursuant to the terms of outstanding loans, or other wise. RUS may not require borrowers to fund consultants. The provision of section 18(c) may be utilized only at the borrower's request. This collection of information implements RUS policies and procedures for use of consultants funded by RUS Borrowers to facilitate timely action on a borrower's loan application for financial assistance and for RUS approvals. *Estimate of Burden:* Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 2 hours per response. *Respondents:* Not for profit institutions; business or other for-profit entities. *Estimated Number of Respondents:* 6. *Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent:* 1. *Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents:* 12 hours. Dated: January 27, 2006. James M. Andrew, Administrator, Rural Utilities Service. [FR Doc. E6-1455 Filed 2-2-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410-15-P COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED Procurement List; Addition AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled. ACTION: Addition to Procurement List. SUMMARY: This action adds to the Procurement List a service to be furnished by nonprofit agencies employing persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities. DATES: *Effective Date:* March 5, 2006. ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled, Jefferson Plaza 2, Suite 10800, 1421 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, Virginia, 22202-3259. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sheryl D. Kennerly, Telephone:
(703)603-7740, Fax:
(703)603-0655, or e-mail *SKennerly@jwod.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 18, 2005, the Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled published notice (70 FR 69934) of proposed additions to the Procurement List. After consideration of the material presented to it concerning capability of qualified nonprofit agency to provide the service and impact of the additions on the current or most recent contractors, the Committee has determined that the service listed below is suitable for procurement by the Federal Government under 41 U.S.C. 46-48c and 41 CFR 51-2.4. Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification I certify that the following action will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. The major factors considered for this certification were: 1. The action will not result in any additional reporting, recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities other than the small organizations that will furnish the service to the Government. 2. The action will result in authorizing small entities to furnish the service to the Government. 3. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner- O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46-48c) in connection with the service proposed for addition to the Procurement List. End of Certification Accordingly, the following service is added to the Procurement List: Service Service Type/Location: Base Supply Center, Department of the Army, Building 2961 Vanture Road, Fort Sill, Oklahoma. NPA: Beacon Lighthouse, Inc., Wichita Falls, Texas. Contracting Activity: U.S. Army Field Artillery Center & Fort Sill, Fort Sill, Oklahoma. This action does not affect current contracts awarded prior to the effective date of this addition or options that may be exercised under those contracts. Sheryl D. Kennerly, Director, Information Management. [FR Doc. E6-1472 Filed 2-2-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6353-01-P COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED Procurement List; Proposed Additions AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled. ACTION: Proposed additions to Procurement List. SUMMARY: The Committee is proposing to add to the Procurement List services to be furnished by nonprofit agencies employing persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities. *Comments Must be Received on or Before:* March 5, 2006. ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled, Jefferson Plaza 2, Suite 10800, 1421 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, Virginia, 22202-3259. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR TO SUBMIT COMMENTS CONTACT: Sheryl D. Kennerly, Telephone:
(703)603-7740, Fax:
(703)603-0655, or e-mail *SKennerly@jwod.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published pursuant to 41 U.S.C. 47(a)(2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide interested persons an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed actions. If the Committee approves the proposed additions, the entities of the Federal Government identified in the notice for each product or service will be required to procure the services listed below from nonprofit agencies employing persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities. Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification I certify that the following action will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. The major factors considered for this certification were: 1. If approved, the action will not result in any additional reporting, recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities other than the small organizations that will furnish the services to the Government. 2. If approved, the action will result in authorizing small entities to furnish the services to the Government. 3. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46-48c) in connection with the services proposed for addition to the Procurement List. Comments on this certification are invited. Commenters should identify the statement(s) underlying the certification on which they are providing additional information. End of Certification The following services are proposed for addition to Procurement List for production by the nonprofit agencies listed: Services Service Type/Location: Custodial Services, Basewide (Remaining 51% of requirement). Naval Submarine Base New London, Box 26, Bldg. 135, Groton, Connecticut. NPA: CW Resources, Inc., New Britain, Connecticut. Contracting Activity: Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Groton, Connecticut. Service Type/Location: Food Service Attendant. Connecticut Air National Guard, Bldg 20, 206 Boston Post Road, Orange, Connecticut. NPA: CW Resources, Inc., New Britain, Connecticut. Contracting Activity: Connecticut Air National Guard, 103d Fighter Wing, East Granby, CT. Sheryl D. Kennerly, Director, Information Management. [FR Doc. E6-1473 Filed 2-2-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6353-01-P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Bureau of Industry and Security Action Affecting Export Privileges; Wen Enterprises, Ning Wen, Hailin Lin; Order Renewing Temporary Denial Order Against Wen Enterprises (“WE”), Ning Wen (“Wen”), and Hailin Lin (“Lin”) In the Matters of: WEN ENTERPRISES, 402 Wild Oak Drive, Manitowoc, WI 54220 and, NING WEN, 402 Wild Oak Drive, Manitowoc, WI 54220 and, HAILIN LIN, 402 Wild Oak Drive, Manitowoc, WI 54220, Respondents. Pursuant to section 766.24 of the Export Administration Regulations (“EAR”), the Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”), U.S. Department of Commerce, through its Office of Export Enforcement (“OEE”), has requested that I renew for 180 days an Order temporarily denying export privileges of Wen Enterprises (“WE”), 402 Wild Oak Drive, Manitowoc, WI 54220; Ning Wen (“Wen”), 402 Wild Oak Drive, WI 54220; and Hailin Lin (“Lin”), 402 Wild Oak Drive, Manitowoc, WI 54220 (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Respondents”). BIS has not sought a renewal of the Order against Beijing Rich Linscience Electronics Company or Ruo Ling Wang. On January 31, 2005, I found that evidence presented by BIS demonstrated that the Respondents conspired to do acts that violated the EAR and did in fact commit numerous violations of the EAR by participating in the unlicensed export of national security controlled items to the People's Republic of China (“PRC”). I further found that such violations had been significant, deliberate and covert, and were likely to occur again, especially given the nature of the structure and relationships of the Respondents. Effective July 31, 2005, I found that, based on the continued circumstances that led to the initial issuance of the Order Denying Export Privileges on January 31, 2005, and on the additional evidence supplied by OEE, that the renewal of the Order for a period of 180 days was necessary and in the public interest, to prevent an imminent violation of the EAR. OEE has presented additional evidence that, on September 20, 2005, a jury convicted Wen of nine counts related to his participation in a conspiracy to violate U.S. export control laws. On January 18, 2006, Wen was sentenced to 60 months in prison and a $50,000 fine. OEE also presented evidence that on December 21, 2005, Lin was sentenced to 42 months in prison and a $50,000 fine for her involvement in the conspiracy to violate U.S. export laws. OEE has informed me that Wen and Lin remain out of custody, on bond, and reside at a location that is both their home and also the operating address of WE. I now find, based on the continued circumstances that led to the initial issuance of the Order Denying Export Privileges on January 31, 2005, on the evidence that was presented by OEE prior to the Order's renewal on July 31, 2005, and on the additional evidence supplied by OEE, that the renewal of this Order for a period of 180 days is necessary and in the public interest, to prevent an imminent violation of the EAR. All parties to this Order have been given notice of the request for renewal in accordance with section 766.24 of the EAR. *It Is Therefore Ordered:* *First,* that the Respondents, Wen Enterprises, 402 Wild Oak Drive, Manitowoc, WI 54220; Ning Wen, 402 Wild Oak Drive, Manitowoc, WI 54220; and Hailin Lin, 402 Wild Oak Drive, Manitowoc, WI 54220 (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Respondents”), and their successors and assigns and when acting on behalf of any of the Respondents, their officers, employees, agents or representatives, (“Denied Persons”) may not, directly or indirectly, participate in any way in any transaction involving any commodity, software or technology (hereinafter collectively referred to as “item”) exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the Export Administration Regulations (“EAR”), or in any other activity subject to the EAR including, but not limited to: A. Apply for, obtaining, or using any license, License Exception, or export control document; B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying, receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of, forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way, any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the EAR, or in any other activity subject to the EAR; or C. Benefiting in any way from any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the EAR, or in any other activity subject to the EAR. *Second,* that no person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the following: A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of the Denied Person any item subject to the EAR; B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted acquisition by the Denied Person of the ownership, possession, or control of any item subject to the EAR that has been or will be exported from the United States, including financing or other support activities related to a transaction whereby the Denied Person acquires or attempts to acquire such ownership, possession or control; C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition or attempted acquisition from the Denied Person of any item subject to the EAR that has been exported from the United States; D. Obtain from the Denied Person in the United States any item subject to the EAR with knowledge or reason to know that the item will be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States; or E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the EAR that has been or will be exported from the United States and which is owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Person, or service any item, of whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Person if such service involves the use of any item subject to the EAR that has been or will be exported from the United States. For puposes of this paragraph, servicing means installation, maintenance, repair, modification or testing. *Third,* that after notice and opportunity for comment as provided in section 766.23 of the EAR, any other person, firm, corporation, or business organization related to any of the Respondents by affiliation, ownership, control, or position of responsibility in the conduct of trade or related services may also be made subject to the provisions of this Order. *Fourth,* that this Order does not prohibit any export, reexport, or other transaction subject to the EAR where the only items involved that are subject to the EAR are the foreign-produced direct product of U.S.-origin technology. In accordance with the provisions of section 766.24(e) of the EAR, the Respondents may, at any time, appeal this Order by filing a full written statement in support of the appeal with the Office of the Administrative Law Judge, U.S. Coast Guard ALJ Docketing Center, 40 South Gay Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202-4022. In accordance with the provisions of section 766.24(d) of the EAR, BIS may seek renewal of this Order by filing a written request not later than 20 days before the expiration date. The Respondents may oppose a request to renew this Order by filing a written submission with the Assistant Secretary for Export Enforcement, which must be received not later than seven days before the expiration date of the Order. A copy of this Order shall be served on the Respondents, and shall be published in the **Federal Register** . This Order is effective on January 27, 2006 and shall remain in effect for 180 days. Entered this 27th day of January, 2006. Wendy Wysong, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Enforcement. [FR Doc. 06-1003 Filed 2-2-06; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
U.S. Code
12 references not yet in our index
- 36 CFR 219
- 5 CFR 1320
- Pub. L. 104-13
- 5 CFR 1320.8(d)
- 7 CFR 1730
- 7 CFR 1755
- 7 CFR 1744
- Pub. L. 101-624
- 7 CFR 1789
- 41 USC 46-48c
- 41 CFR 51
- 41 USC 47(a)(2)
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice of meeting
Cite36 CFR 219
Cite5 CFR 1320
Pub. L.Pub. L. 104-13
Cite5 CFR 1320.8(d)
Cite7 CFR 1730
Cites 13 · showing 6Cited by 0 across 0 sources