Notices. Request for comments, nominations of scientific experts, and submission of data

4,593 words·~21 min read·/register/2006/01/27/06-668

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health National Toxicology Program (NTP), NTP Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods (NICEATM); Nomination To Hold a Workshop on Alternative Methods To Replace the Mouse LD 50 Assay for Botulinum Toxin Potency Testing: Request for Comments, Nominations of Experts, and Submission of In Vivo and In Vitro Data AGENCY: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), National Institutes of Health (NIH).

ACTION: Request for comments, nominations of scientific experts, and submission of data. SUMMARY: In October 2005, the Humane Society of the United States

(HSUS)submitted a nomination to NICEATM requesting that alternative test methods to the mouse LD 50 assay for botulinum toxin potency testing be assessed and prioritized for prevalidation and validation efforts. The nomination proposed that an initial key step in this process would be for the Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM) to organize a workshop on this topic. ICCVAM considered the nomination and supports with a high priority the concept of a workshop to discuss alternative methods and approaches that might reduce, refine, or replace the use of animals for botulinum potency testing. The Scientific Advisory Committee on Alternative Toxicological Methods (SACATM) considered the nomination and the ICCVAM proposal at its meeting on December 12, 2005, and agreed that the proposed activity should have a high priority. At this time, NICEATM requests

(1)information on development and/or validation activities relevant to reduction, refinement (less pain and distress), and/or replacement alternatives for botulinum toxin potency testing,

(2)public comments on the appropriateness and relative priority of proceeding with a workshop on this topic,

(3)the nomination of scientific experts who might participate if a workshop occurs, and

(4)the submission of data from mouse LD 50 botulinum potency testing and *ex vivo* and *in vitro* test methods used for botulinum toxin potency testing. The HSUS nomination is available at *http://iccvam.niehs.nih.gov/* see “Nominations and Submissions.” DATES: Comments, nominations of expert scientists, and data submissions should be received by March 13, 2006. ADDRESSES: Correspondence should be sent by mail, fax, or e-mail to Dr. William S. Stokes, NICEATM Director, NIEHS, P.O. Box 12233, MD EC-17, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, (phone) 919-541-2384,

(fax)919-541-0947, (e-mail) *niceatm@niehs.nih.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background In October 2005, the HSUS submitted a nomination to NICEATM to organize a workshop to evaluate the state-of-the-science for potential alternatives to the mouse LD 50 assay for botulinum toxin potency testing. The HSUS nomination is available at *http://iccvam.niehs.nih.gov/* see “Nominations and Submissions.” ICCVAM considered the nomination and supports the concept of a workshop to discuss alternative methods and approaches that might reduce, refine, or replace the use of animals for botulinum potency testing with a high priority. The SACATM discussed this nomination at its meeting on December 12, 2005, and advised NICEATM and ICCVAM that they consider the development and validation of alternatives to the mouse LD 50 assay for botulinum toxin potency testing a high priority. SACATM also suggested that prior to convening a workshop that ICCVAM and NICEATM find out what efforts toward developing or validating alternatives might already be underway by companies that conduct botulinum potency testing. NICEATM now seeks

(1)information on any activities directed at the development and/or validation of alternatives to the mouse LD 50 assay for botulinum toxin potency testing,

(2)input from the public on this nomination for a workshop,

(3)the nomination of scientific experts who might participate in any future workshop on this topic should it occur, as well as

(4)data from mouse LD 50 botulinum potency testing and *ex vivo* and *in vitro* test methods used for botulinum toxin potency testing. NICEATM and ICCVAM will consider this information and determine how to best move forward with this nomination. Request for Comments, Nominations of Scientific Experts and Request for Data NICEATM requests information on the status of any efforts to develop alternatives to the mouse LD 50 assay for botulinum toxin potency testing, as well as public comments on the appropriateness and relative priority of the proposed workshop activity. In addition, NICEATM requests the nomination of scientists with relevant knowledge and experience to potentially participate in the workshop should it be held. Areas of relevant expertise include, but are not limited to: neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, neurotoxicity, immunology, potency testing of toxins and other biologicals in animals and *in vitro* systems, development and use of *in vitro* methodologies, and biostatistical data analysis. Each nomination should include the person's name, affiliation, contact information ( *i.e.* , mailing address, e-mail address, telephone and fax numbers), and a brief summary of relevant experience and qualifications. NICEATM invites the submission of data from *in vivo* botulinum toxin potency testing, including clinical observations and corresponding time-course information, and information and data from *ex vivo* and *in vitro* test methods being used as potential alternatives to the mouse assay for botulinum toxin potency testing. Submitted data will be used to further evaluate the usefulness and limitations of *in vitro* potency test methods and may be included in future NICEATM and ICCVAM reports and publications as appropriate. The data will also be included in a NICEATM database to support the investigation of alternative test methods for assessing potency of botulinum toxin. When submitting chemical and protocol information/test data, please reference this **Federal Register** notice and provide appropriate contact information (name, affiliation, mailing address, phone, fax, e-mail, and sponsoring organization, as applicable). NICEATM prefers data to be submitted as copies of pages from study notebooks and/or study reports, if available. Raw data and analyses available in electronic format may also be submitted. Each submission should preferably include the following information, as appropriate: • Specific type of botulinum neurotoxin tested ( *e.g., Clostridium botulinum* neurotoxin type A) • *In vivo* potency test protocol used. • *In vivo* potency test results. • Individual animal responses, including time of onset of specific clinical signs and death. • Alternative *ex vivo* or *in vitro* test protocol used. • Alternative *ex vivo* or *in vitro* test results. • The extent to which the study complied with national or international Good Laboratory Practice

(GLP)guidelines. • Date of the study. • The organization that conducted the study. Although public comments and data can be accepted at any time, information submitted by the deadline listed in this notice would be most useful for determining whether a workshop is the appropriate next step in pursuing an alternative to the mouse LD 50 assay for botulinum toxin potency testing. In addition, submitting information by this date ensures its availability to workshop participants if a workshop is held. Background Information on ICCVAM, NICEATM, and SACATM ICCVAM is an interagency committee composed of representatives from 15 Federal regulatory and research agencies that use or generate toxicological information. ICCVAM conducts technical evaluations of new, revised, and alternative methods with regulatory applicability and promotes the scientific validation and regulatory acceptance of toxicological test methods that more accurately assess the safety and hazards of chemicals and products and that refine, reduce, or replace animal use. The ICCVAM Authorization Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-545) establishes ICCVAM as a permanent interagency committee of the NIEHS under the NICEATM. NICEATM administers the ICCVAM and provides scientific and operational support for ICCVAM-related activities. NICEATM and ICCVAM work collaboratively to evaluate new and improved test methods applicable to the needs of Federal agencies. Additional information about ICCVAM and NICEATM can be found at the following Web site: *http://www.iccvam.niehs.nih.gov.* The SACATM, established January 9, 2002, is a federally chartered advisory committee composed of scientists from the public and private sectors ( **Federal Register** : March 13, 2002: Vol. 67, No. 49, page 11358). The SACATM provides advice to the Director of the NIEHS, ICCVAM, and NICEATM regarding statutorily mandated duties of ICCVAM and activities of NICEATM. Additional information about SACATM, including the charter, roster, and records of past meetings, can be found at *http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/* , see “Advisory Board & Committees.” Dated: January 17, 2006. Samuel H. Wilson, Deputy Director, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. [FR Doc. E6-1019 Filed 1-26-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4140-01-P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard [USCG-2006-23665] Collection of Information Under Review by Office of Management and Budget: OMB Control Numbers 1625-0009, 1625-0014, 1625-0038, and 1625-0039 AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. ACTION: Request for comments. SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the U.S. Coast Guard intends to seek the approval of OMB for the renewal of four Information Collection Requests (ICRs). The ICRs are:

(1)1625-0009, Oil Record Book for Ships;

(2)1625-0014, Request for Designation and Exemption of Oceanographic Research Vessels;

(3)1625-0038, Plan Approval and Records for Tank, Passenger, Cargo and Miscellaneous Vessels, Mobile Offshore Drilling Units, Nautical School Vessels, Oceanographic Research Vessels and Electrical Engineering ? 46 CFR Subchapters D, H, I, I-A, J, R, and U; and

(4)1625-0039, Declaration of Inspection Before Transfer of Liquid Cargo in Bulk. Before submitting the ICRs to OMB, the Coast Guard is inviting comments on them as described below. DATES: Comments must reach the Coast Guard on or before March 28, 2006. ADDRESSES: To make sure that your comments and related material do not enter the docket [USCG-2006-23665] more than once, please submit them by only one of the following means:

(1)By mail to the Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), room PL-401, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001.

(2)By delivery to room PL-401 on the Plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.

(3)By fax to the Docket Management Facility at 202-493-2251.

(4)Electronically through the Web Site for the Docket Management System at *http://dms.dot.gov* . The Docket Management Facility maintains the public docket for this notice. Comments and material received from the public, as well as documents mentioned in this notice as being available in the docket, will become part of this docket and will be available for inspection or copying at room PL-401 on the Plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. You may also find this docket on the Internet at *http://dms.dot.gov* . Copies of the complete ICRs are available through this docket on the Internet at *http://dms.dot.gov* , and also from Commandant (CG-611), U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters, room 6106 (Attn: Mr. Arthur Requina), 1900 Half Street, SW., Washington, DC 20593-0001. The telephone number is 202-475-3523. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Arthur Requina, Office of Information Management, telephone 202-475-3523, or fax 202-475-3529, for questions on these documents; or telephone Ms. Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, 202-493-0402, for questions on the docket. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Public participation and request for comments. We encourage you to respond to this request for comments by submitting comments and related materials. We will post all comments received, without change, to *http://dms.dot.gov* ; they will include any personal information you have provided. We have an agreement with DOT to use the Docket Management Facility. Please see the paragraph on DOT's “Privacy Act Policy” below. Submitting comments: If you submit a comment, please include your name and address, identify the docket number [USCG-2006-23665], indicate the specific section of the document to which each comment applies, and give the reason for each comment. You may submit your comments and material by electronic means, mail, fax, or delivery to the Docket Management Facility at the address under ADDRESSES ; but please submit them by only one means. If you submit them by mail or delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8 1/2 by 11 inches, suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail and would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during the comment period. We may change the documents supporting this collection of information or even the underlying requirements in view of them. Viewing comments and documents: To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this notice as being available in the docket, go to *http://dms.dot.gov* at any time and conduct a simple search using the docket number. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in room PL-401 on the Plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Privacy Act: Anyone can search the electronic form of all comments received in dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review the Privacy Act Statement of DOT in the **Federal Register** published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477), or you may visit *http://dms.dot.gov* . Information Collection Request 1. *Title:* Oil Record Book for Ships. *OMB Control Number:* 1625-0009. *Summary:* The Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships (APPS), 33 U.S.C. 1901-1911, and the International Convention for Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as modified by the 1978 Protocol relating thereto (MARPOL 73/78), require that information about oil cargo or fuel operations be entered into an Oil Record Book (CG-4602A). The requirement is contained in 33 CFR 151.25. *Need:* This information is used to verify sightings of actual violations of the APPS to determine the level of compliance with MARPOL 73/78 and as a means of reinforcing the discharge provisions. *Respondents:* Operators of vessels. *Frequency:* On occasion. *Burden Estimate:* The estimated burden has decreased from 29,048 hours to 26,993 hours a year. 2. *Title:* Request for Designation and Exemption of Oceanographic Research Vessels. *OMB Control Number:* 1625-0014. *Summary:* Title 46 U.S.C. 2113 authorizes the Secretary of Homeland Security to exempt Oceanographic Research Vessels, by regulation, from provisions of Subtitle II, of Title 46, Shipping, of the United States Code, concerning maritime safety and seaman's welfare laws. *Need:* This information is necessary to ensure a vessel qualifies for the designation. *Respondents:* Owners or operators of vessels. *Frequency:* On occasion. *Burden Estimate:* The estimated burden has increased from 21 hours to 51 hours a year. 3. *Title:* Plan Approval and Records for Tank, Passenger, Cargo and Miscellaneous Vessels, Mobile Offshore Drilling Units, Nautical School Vessels, Oceanographic Research Vessels and Electrical Engineering ? 46 CFR Subchapters D, H, I, I-A, J, R, and U. *OMB Control Number:* 1625-0038. *Summary:* This information collection requires the shipyard, designer or manufacturer for the construction of a vessel to submit plans, technical information and operating manuals to the Coast Guard. *Need:* Under 46 U.S.C. 3301, 3306, and 3307, the Coast Guard is responsible for enforcing regulations promoting the safety of life and property in marine transportation. The Coast Guard uses this information to ensure that a vessel meets the applicable standards for construction, arrangement and equipment. *Respondents:* Shipyards, designers, and manufacturers of certain vessels. *Frequency:* On occasion. *Burden Estimate:* The estimated burden has increased from 8,835 hours to 13,790 hours a year. 4. *Title:* Declaration of Inspection Before Transfer of Liquid Cargo in Bulk. *OMB Control Number:* 1625-0039. *Summary:* A Declaration of Inspection

(DOI)documents the transfer of oil and hazardous materials, to help prevent spills and damage to a facility or vessel. Persons-in-charge of the transfer operations must review and certify compliance with procedures specified by the terms of the DOI. *Need:* 33 U.S.C. 1231 authorizes the Coast Guard to establish regulations to prevent the discharge of oil and hazardous material from vessels and facilities. The DOI regulations appear at 33 CFR 156.150 and 46 CFR 35.35-30. *Respondents:* Persons-in-charge of transfers. *Frequency:* On occasion. *Burden Estimate:* The estimated burden has increased from 66,223 hours to 68,534 hours a year. Dated: January 20, 2006. R.T. Hewitt, Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Assistant Commandant for Command, Control, Communications, Computers and Information Technology. [FR Doc. E6-1013 Filed 1-26-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-15-P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard [USCG-2004-19842] Ballast Water Management for Vessels Entering the Great Lakes That Declare No Ballast Onboard; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. ACTION: Notice of availability. SUMMARY: The Coast Guard announces the availability of the Final Environmental Assessment

(EA)and Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) that evaluated the potential environmental impacts resulting from the implementation of the policy on ballast water management for vessels entering the Great Lakes declaring no ballast onboard (NOBOB). The purpose of this policy is to prevent the introductions of aquatic nonindigenous species

(NIS)into the Great Lakes. ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public as well as documents mentioned in this notice as being available in the docket, are part of Coast Guard docket number USCG-2004-19842 and are available for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, room PL-401, 400 Seventh Street, SW., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays. You may also find this docket on the Internet at *http://dms.dot.gov* . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information concerning this project, call Mr. Bivan Patnaik, Project Manager, Environmental Standards Division, U.S. Coast Guard, telephone 202-267-1744 or via e-mail: *bpatnaik@comdt.uscg.mil* . If you have any questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Ms. Andrea M. Jenkins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, Department of Transportation, telephone 202-366-0271. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (Section 102(2)(c)), as implemented by the Council of Environmental Quality regulations (40 CFR parts 1500-1508) and Coast Guard Policy for Considering Environmental Impacts (COMDTINST M16475.1D), the Coast Guard prepared a Final EA and FONSI for implementing the policy on best management practices for NOBOB vessels. Response to Comments The Coast Guard requested comments on the Draft EA when the Notice of policy; availability of Draft EA was published on August 31, 2005 (70 FR 51831). The Coast Guard received 11 comments; however, only 2 out of the 11 comments specifically addressed the Draft EA. Therefore, the Coast Guard will only respond to those comments that addressed the Draft EA. One commenter agreed that the policy on best management practices for NOBOB vessels will have no adverse or beneficial significant impacts on the environment. The Coast Guard partially agrees with this comment. As the EA and FONSI discuss we agree that there will be no significant adverse impact; however, we do believe that beneficial impacts to the environment will occur if NOBOB vessels conduct the recommended best management practices. These practices are intended to prevent NIS from being introduced into the Great Lakes. One commenter expressed disappointment that the Draft EA did not analyze mandatory best management practices as one of the alternatives. The Coast Guard has been evaluating NOBOB vessels with residual water and sediments with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's

(NOAA)Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory (GLERL), and other partners as part of the NOAA/GLERL NOBOB Research Project. Although the NOAA/GLERL NOBOB Report published in April 2005, suggests that saltwater flushing (one of the Coast Guard's recommended best management practices) would be an effective practice to protect the Great Lakes from NIS in fresh and/or brackish residual waters, the practice has never been validated for efficacy or feasibility. We are working with NOAA/GLERL and other partners to evaluate both the efficacy and feasibility of saltwater flushing. The Coast Guard is also monitoring the level of participation of vessels conducting the recommended best management practices through record checks and sampling since vessels may not always be able to conduct these practices due to vessel/crew safety concerns and other operational requirements. These evaluations will determine if further refinements to the program are necessary. The Coast Guard is developing a ballast water discharge standard for all vessels including vessels which enter the Great Lakes because ballast water exchange and similar practices are interim measures. This standard will be more effective in preventing invasions than mandatory best management practices. Environmental Assessment The Final EA identified and examined those reasonable alternatives needed to effectively prevent NIS introductions into the Great Lakes via NOBOB vessels. The Final EA analyzed the no action alternative and one action alternative that could fulfill the purpose and need of establishing best management practices for NOBOB vessels to reduce NIS introductions into the Great Lakes. Specifically, the Final EA considered potential effects to the natural and human environments by incorporating environmental analyses previously conducted for establishing ballast water management regulations for U.S. waters. Dated: January 19, 2006. T.H. Gilmour, Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Assistant Commandant for Prevention. [FR Doc. E6-1014 Filed 1-26-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-15-P DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT [Docket No. FR-5045-N-04] Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Ezzell, room 7266, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20410; telephone

(202)708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired

(202)708-2565 (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-7588. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 24 CFR part 581 and section 501 of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11411), as amended, HUD is publishing this Notice to identify Federal buildings and other real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. The properties were reviewed using information provided to HUD by Federal landholding agencies regarding unutilized and underutilized buildings and real property controlled by such agencies or by GSA regarding its inventory of excess or surplus Federal property. This Notice is also published in order to comply with the December 12, 1988 Court Order in *National Coalition for the Homeless* v. *Veterans Administration* , No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.). Properties reviewed are listed in this Notice according to the following categories: Suitable/available, suitable/unavailable, suitable/to be excess, and unsuitable. The properties listed in the three suitable categories have been reviewed by the landholding agencies, and each agency has transmitted to HUD:

(1)Its intention to make the property available for use to assist the homeless,

(2)its intention to declare the property excess to the agency's needs, or

(3)a statement of the reasons that the property cannot be declared excess or made available for use as facilities to assist the homeless. Properties listed as suitable/available will be available exclusively for homeless use for a period of 60 days from the date of this Notice. Where property is described as for “off-site use only” recipients of the property will be required to relocate the building to their own site at their own expense. Homeless assistance providers interested in any such property should send a written expression of interest to HHS, addressed to John Hicks, Division of Property Management, Program Support Center, HHS, room 5B-17, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857;

(301)443-2265. (This is not a toll-free number.) HHS will mail to the interested provider an application packet, which will include instructions for completing the application. In order to maximize the opportunity to utilize a suitable property, providers should submit their written expressions of interest as soon as possible. For complete details concerning the processing of applications, the reader is encouraged to refer to the interim rule governing this program, 24 CFR part 581. For properties listed as suitable/to be excess, that property may, if subsequently accepted as excess by GSA, be made available for use by the homeless in accordance with applicable law, subject to screening for other Federal use. At the appropriate time, HUD will publish the property in a Notice showing it as either suitable/available or suitable/unavailable. For properties listed as suitable/unavailable, the landholding agency has decided that the property cannot be declared excess or made available for use to assist the homeless, and the property will not be available. Properties listed as unsuitable will not be made available for any other purpose for 20 days from the date of this Notice. Homeless assistance providers interested in a review by HUD of the determination of unsuitability should call the toll free information line at 1-800-927-7588 for detailed instructions or write a letter to Mark Johnston at the address listed at the beginning of this Notice. Included in the request for review should be the property address (including zip code), the date of publication in the **Federal Register** , the landholding agency, and the property number. For more information regarding particular properties identified in this Notice ( *i.e.,* acreage, floor plan, existing sanitary facilities, exact street address), providers should contact the appropriate landholding agencies at the following addresses: *GSA:* Mr. John Kelly, Acting Deputy Assistant Commissioner, General Services Administration, Office of Property Disposal, 18th and F Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20405;

(202)501-0084; *Navy:* Mr. Warren Meekins, Department of the Navy, Real Estate Services, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Washington Navy Yard, 1322 Patterson Ave., SE., Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20374-5065;

(202)685-9305; (These are not toll-free numbers). Dated: January 19, 2006. Mark R. Johnston, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs. Title V, Federal Surplus Property Program, Federal Register Report for 1/27/2006 Suitable/Available Properties Buildings (by State) Washington Vancouver Chapel 1601 E. 4th Plain Blvd. Vancouver Co: Clark WA 98661- Landholding Agency: GSA Status: Excess Comment: 2906 sq. ft., asbestos siding, off-site use only GSA Number: 9-V-WA-1230 Suitable/Unavailable Properties Buildings (by State) Texas Federal Center Bldgs. 1-4, 40 501 West Felix Street Fort Worth Co: Tarrant TX 76115- Landholding Agency: GSA Property Number: 54200610002 Status: Excess Comment: Requires substantial repairs, easements, restrictive, covenants required GSA Number: 7-G-TX-07672 Unsuitable Properties Buildings (by State) California Naval Security Group Skaggs Island Sonoma Co: CA Landholding Agency: GSA Property Number: 54200610005 Status: Excess Reason: Isolated area GSA Number: 9-N-CA-1488 Bldg. 325 Naval Base Port Hueneme Co: Ventura CA 93043- Landholding Agency: Navy Property Number: 77200610001 Status: Unutilized Reasons: Within airport runway clear zone; Secured Area; Extensive deterioration Hawaii Bldg. 346 Naval Station Pearl Harbor Co: HI 96860- Landholding Agency: Navy Property Number: 77200610002 Status: Excess Reason: Extensive deterioration Bldgs. 86, 589 Pearl City Peninsula Pearl Harbor Co: Honolulu HI 96860- Landholding Agency: Navy Property Number: 77200610003 Status: Excess Reason: Secured Area 5 Bldgs. Pearl City Peninsula 590, 595, 596, 597, 598 Pearl Harbor Co: Honolulu HI 96860- Landholding Agency: Navy Property Number: 77200610004 Status: Excess Reason: Secured Area Bldg. 5798 Pearl City Peninsula Pearl Harbor Co: Honolulu HI 96860- Landholding Agency: Navy Property Number: 77200610005 Status: Excess Reason: Secured Area Bldg. 776 Pearl City Peninsula Pearl Harbor Co: Honolulu HI 96860- Landholding Agency: Navy Property Number: 77200610006 Status: Excess Reason: Secured Area Virginia Bldg. U63 Naval Amphibious Base Little Creek Co: Norfolk VA 23521- Landholding Agency: Navy Property Number: 77200610007 Status: Excess Reason: Extensive deterioration Bldg. 3660 Naval Amphibious Base Little Creek Co: Norfolk VA 23521- Landholding Agency: Navy Property Number: 77200610008 Status: Excess Reason: Extensive deterioration Bldg. 3830 Naval Amphibious Base Little Creek Co: Norfolk VA 23521- Landholding Agency: Navy Property Number: 77200610009 Status: Excess Reason: Extensive deterioration Land (by State) Ohio 7100 Block Olde Eight Road Boston Heights Co: OH 44235- Landholding Agency: GSA Property Number: 54200610001 Status: Excess Reason: Within 2000 ft. of flammable or explosive material GSA Number: 1-D-Oh-828 Wisconsin Parcel No 17-10267-50 600 Fisherman Road LaCrosse Co: WI 54603- Landholding Agency: GSA Property Number: 54200610004 Status: Excess Reason: Within 2000 ft. of flammable or explosive material GSA Number: 1-I-WI-605 [FR Doc. 06-668 Filed 1-26-06; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 5

Traces to 5 documents

CFR

U.S. Code

5 references not yet in our index