Notices. Notice of issuance of advisory circular

4,146 words·~19 min read·/register/2006/01/12/06-232

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P DEPARTMENT OF STATE [Public Notice 5270] Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition Determinations: “Goya's Last Works” SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, *et seq.* ; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, *et seq.* ), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Goya's Last Works”, imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance.

The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Frick Collection from on or about February 22, 2006 until on or about May 14, 2006, and at possible additional venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the **Federal Register** . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Wolodymyr Sulzynsky, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S.

Department of State (telephone: 202/453-8050). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001. Dated: January 3, 2006. C. Miller Crouch, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. [FR Doc. E6-246 Filed 1-11-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4710-05-P DEPARTMENT OF STATE [Public Notice 5261] Announcement of Meetings of the International Telecommunication Advisory Committee SUMMARY:

This notice corrects meeting days (not dates) announced in Notice 5219. The International Telecommunication Advisory Committee announces meetings to prepare for the Organization of American States CITEL Assembly 2006. The International Telecommunication Advisory Committee

(ITAC)will meet on each Wednesday 2-4 p.m. during January and February starting January 11, 2006 to prepare for the 2006 ITU Plenipotentiary Conference. The meetings will be held at the offices of AT&T, 1120 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC. A conference bridge will be provided. Directions to the venue of the meeting may be obtained from Julian Minard *minardje@state.gov.* The International Telecommunication Advisory Committee

(ITAC)will meet on each Thursday 2-4 p.m. during January and February starting January 12, 2006 to prepare for the 2006 ITU Telecommunication Development Conference. A conference bridge will be provided. Directions to the venue of the meeting may be obtained from Julian Minard *minardje@state.gov.* The International Telecommunication Advisory Committee

(ITAC)will meet on Tuesday January 31 and February 14, 2006 both 2-4 p.m. to prepare for the 2006 OAS CITEL Assembly. A conference bridge will be provided. Directions to the venue of the meeting may be obtained from Julian Minard *minardje@state.gov* . Dated: January 5, 2006. Douglas R. Spalt, Telcom Officer, International Communications & Information Policy, Department of State. [FR Doc. E6-248 Filed 1-11-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4710-07-P DEPARTMENT OF STATE [Public Notice 5259] Shipping Coordinating Committee; Notice of Meeting The Shipping Coordinating Committee

(SHC)will conduct an open meeting at 1:30 p.m. on Wednesday, January 25, 2006, at the Hilton Hotel in Crystal City, Arlington, VA. The primary purpose of the meeting is to begin preparations for the 49th Session of the International Maritime Organization

(IMO)Sub-Committee on Stability and Load Lines and on Fishing Vessels Safety to be held at IMO Headquarters in London, England from July 24th to 28th. The primary matters to be considered include: —Development of explanatory notes for harmonized SOLAS Chapter II-1; —Passenger ship safety; —Review of the Intact Stability Code; —Safety of small fishing vessels; —Tonnage measurement of open-top containerships. Members of the public may attend this meeting up to the seating capacity of the room. Interested persons may seek information by writing to Mr. Paul Cojeen, Commandant (G-MSE), U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters, 2100 Second Street SW., Room 1308, Washington, DC 20593-0001 or by calling

(202)267-2988. Dated: January 6, 2006. Clay L. Diamond, Executive Secretary, Shipping Coordinating Committee, Department of State. [FR Doc. E6-242 Filed 1-11-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4710-09-P DEPARTMENT OF STATE [Public Notice 5260] Shipping Coordinating Committee; Notice of Meeting The Shipping Coordinating Committee

(SHC)will conduct an open meeting at 9:30 a.m. on Tuesday, March 14, 2006, in Room 2415 of the United States Coast Guard Headquarters Building, 2100 2nd Street SW., Washington, DC, 20593-0001. The primary purpose of the meeting is to prepare for the 54th Session of the International Maritime Organization

(IMO)Marine Environment Protection Committee

(MEPC)to be held at IMO Headquarters in London, England from March 20th to 24th, 2006. The primary matters to be considered include: —Harmful aquatic organisms in ballast water; —Recycling of ships; —Prevention of air pollution from ships; —Consideration and adoption of amendments to mandatory instruments; —Interpretation and amendments of MARPOL 73/78 and related instruments; —Implementation of the International Convention on Oil Pollution Preparedness, Response and Cooperation

(OPRC)Convention and the OPRC-Hazardous Noxious Substance (OPRC-HNS) Protocol and relevant conference resolutions; —Identification and protection of Special Areas and Particularly Sensitive Sea Areas; —Inadequacy of reception facilities; —Reports of sub-committees; —Work of other bodies; —Status of Conventions; —Harmful anti-fouling systems for ships; —Promotion of implementation and enforcement of MARPOL 73/78 and related instruments; —Follow-up to UNCED and WSSD; —Technical co-operation programme; —Future role of formal safety assessment and human element issues; —Work program of the Committee and subsidiary bodies; —Application of the Committees' Guidelines; and —Consideration of the report of the Committee. Please note that hard copies of documents associated with MEPC 54 will not be available at this meeting. Documents will be available in Adobe Acrobat format on CD-ROM. To request documents please write to the address provided below, or request documents via the following Internet link: *http://www.uscg.mil/hq/gm/mso/mso4/mepc.html.* Members of the public may attend this meeting up to the seating capacity of the room. Interested persons may seek information by writing to Lieutenant Heather St. Pierre, Commandant (G-MSO-4), U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters, 2100 Second Street SW., Room 1601, Washington, DC 20593-0001 or by calling

(202)267-2079. Dated: January 6, 2006. Clay Diamond, Executive Secretary, Shipping Coordinating Committee, Department of State. [FR Doc. E6-249 Filed 1-11-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4710-09-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular

(AC)23-26, Synthetic Vision and Pathway Depictions on the Primary Flight Display AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT. ACTION: Notice of issuance of advisory circular. SUMMARY: This advisory circular

(AC)sets forth an acceptable means, but not the only means, of showing compliance with Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 23 for two new concepts in small airplanes. The two concepts are:

(1)Synthetic Vision (SV), and

(2)pathway depictions displaying the navigation course on the primary flight display. This AC addresses the two concepts in a head down display format only. This AC covers airplanes in the normal, utility, acrobatic, and commuter categories approved to fly under Instrument Flight Rules (IFR). Material in this AC is neither mandatory nor regulatory in nature and does not constitute a regulation. The draft advisory circular was issued for Public Comment on May 16, 2005 (70 FR 25873). When possible, comments received were used to modify the draft advisory circular. DATES: Advisory Circular

(AC)23-26 was issued by the Manager, Small Airplane Directorate on December 22, 2005. *How To Obtain Copies:* A paper copy of AC 23-22 may be obtained by writing to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Subsequent Distribution Office, DOT Warehouse, M-30, Ardmore East Business Center, 3341Q 75th Avenue, Landover, MD 20785, telephone 301-322-5377, or by faxing your request to the warehouse at 301-386-5394. The AC will also be available on the Internet at *http://www.airweb.faa.gov/ac.* Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on December 22, 2005. Kim Smith, Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certificate Service. [FR Doc. E6-173 Filed 1-11-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-13-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration Consensus Standards, Light-Sport Aircraft AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT. ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments. SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of one new consensus standard and revisions to certain previously accepted consensus standards relating to the provisions of the Sport Pilot and Light-Sport Aircraft rule issued July 16, 2004, and effective September 1, 2004. ASTM International Committee F37 on Light Sport Aircraft developed the new and revised standards with Federal Aviation Administration

(FAA)participation. By this Notice, the FAA finds the new and revised standards acceptable for certification of the specified aircraft under the provisions of the Sport Pilot and Light-Sport Aircraft rule. DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 13, 2006. ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to: Federal Aviation Administration, Small Airplane Directorate, Programs and Procedures Branch, ACE-114, Attention: Larry Werth, Room 301, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. Comments may also be e-mailed to: *Comments-on-LSA-Standard@faa.gov.* All comments must be marked: Consensus Standards Comments, and must specify the standard being addressed by ASTM designation and title. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Werth, Light-Sport Aircraft Program Manager, Programs and Procedures Branch (ACE-114), Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service, Federal Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone

(816)329-4147; e-mail: *larry.werth@faa.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice announces the availability of one new consensus standard and revisions to certain previously accepted consensus standards relating to the provisions of the Sport Pilot and Light-Sport Aircraft rule. ASTM International Committee F37 on Light Sport Aircraft developed the new and revised standards. *Comments Invited:* Interested persons are invited to submit such written data, views, or arguments, as they may desire. Communications should identify the consensus standard number and be submitted to the address specified above. All communications received on or before the closing date for comments will be forwarded to ASTM International Committee F37 for consideration. The standard may be changed in light of the comments received. The FAA will address all comments received during the recurring review of the consensus standard and will participate in the consensus standard revision process. *Background:* Under the provisions of the Sport Pilot and Light-Sport Aircraft rule, and revised Office of Management and Budget

(OMB)Circular A-119, “Federal Participation in the Development and Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards and in Conformity Assessment Activities”, dated February 10, 1998, industry and the FAA have been working with ASTM International to develop consensus standards for light-sport aircraft. These consensus standards satisfy the FAA's goal for airworthiness certification and a verifiable minimum safety level for light-sport aircraft. Instead of developing airworthiness standards through the rulemaking process, the FAA participates as a member of Committee F37 in developing these standards. The use of the consensus standard process assures government and industry discussion and agreement on appropriate standards for the required level of safety. Comments on Previous Notices of Availability In the Notice of Availability

(NOA)issued on July 19, 2005, and published in the **Federal Register** on July 27, 2005, the FAA asked for public comments on the new and revised consensus standards accepted by that NOA. The comment period closed on September 26, 2005. The preamble to the Sport Pilot and Light-Sport Aircraft Rule states, “If comments from the public are received as a result of the Notice of Availability, the FAA will address them during its recurring review of the consensus standards and participation in the consensus standards revision process.” And— “The FAA will respond to comments on the consensus standards in this revision process.” ASTM International Committee F37 examined the public comments received on these new and revised standards during the October 2005 committee meeting held in Sebring, Florida. The committee determined the comments did not warrant or justify any changes or revisions to the standards. Consensus Standards in This Notice of Availability The FAA has reviewed the standards presented in this NOA for compliance with the regulatory requirements of the rule. Any light-sport aircraft issued a special light-sport airworthiness certificate, which has been designed, manufactured, operated and maintained, in accordance with this and previously accepted ASTM consensus standards provides the public with the appropriate level of safety established under the regulations. Manufacturers who choose to produce these aircraft and certificate these aircraft under 14 CFR part 21, 21.190 or 21.191 are subject to the applicable consensus standard requirements. The FAA maintains a listing of all accepted standards at: *http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/avs/offices/afs/afs600/afs610.* The Revised Consensus Standards and Effective Period of Use The following previously accepted consensus standards have been revised, and this NOA is accepting the later revisions. Either the previous revisions or the later revisions may be used for the initial certification of special light-sport aircraft until May 1, 2006. This overlapping period of time will allow aircraft that have started the initial certification process using the previous revision levels to complete that process. After May 1, 2006, manufacturers must use the later revisions and must identify these later revisions in the Statement of Compliance for initial certification of special light-sport aircraft unless the FAA publishes a specific notification otherwise. The following Consensus Standards may not be used after May 1, 2006: a. ASTM Designation F 2241-05, titled: Standard Specification for Continued Airworthiness System for Powered Parachute Aircraft. b. ASTM Designation F 2339-04, titled: Standard Practice for Design and Manufacture of Reciprocating Spark Ignition Engines for Light Sport Aircraft. c. ASTM Designation F 2353-04, titled: Standard Specification for Manufacturer Quality Assurance Program for Lighter-Than-Air Light Sport Aircraft. d. ASTM Designation F 2354-05, titled: Standard Specification for Continued Airworthiness System for Lighter-Than-Air Light Sport Aircraft. e. ASTM Designation F 2355-05, titled: Standard Specification for Design and Performance Requirements for Lighter-Than-Air Light Sport Aircraft. f. ASTM Designation F 2356-05, titled: Standard Specification for Production Acceptance Testing System for Lighter-Than-Air Light Sport Aircraft. g. ASTM Designation F 2425-05, titled: Standard Specification for Continued Airworthiness System for Weight-Shift-Control Aircraft. h. ASTM Designation F 2426-05, titled: Standard Guide on Wing Interface Documentation for Powered Parachute Aircraft. i. ASTM Designation F 2427-05, titled: Standard Specification for Required Product Information to be Provided with Lighter-Than-Air Light Sport Aircraft. The Consensus Standards The FAA finds the following new and revised consensus standards acceptable for certification of the specified aircraft under the provisions of the Sport Pilot and Light-Sport Aircraft rule. The consensus standards listed below may be used unless the FAA publishes a specific notification otherwise. a. ASTM Designation F 2241-05a, titled: Standard Specification for Continued Airworthiness System for Powered Parachute Aircraft. b. ASTM Designation F 2317/F 2317M-05, titled: Standard Specification for Design of Weight-Shift-Control Aircraft. c. ASTM Designation F 2339-05, titled: Standard Practice for Design and Manufacture of Reciprocating Spark Ignition Engines for Light Sport Aircraft. d. ASTM Designation F 2353-05, titled: Standard Specification for Manufacturer Quality Assurance Program for Lighter-Than-Air Light Sport Aircraft. e. ASTM Designation F 2354-05b, titled: Standard Specification for Continued Airworthiness System for Lighter-Than-Air Light Sport Aircraft. f. ASTM Designation F 2355-05a, titled: Standard Specification for Design and Performance Requirements for Lighter-Than-Air Light Sport Aircraft. g. ASTM Designation F 2356-05a, titled: Standard Specification for Production Acceptance Testing System for Lighter-Than-Air Light Sport Aircraft. h. ASTM Designation F 2425-05a, titled: Standard Specification for Continued Airworthiness System for Weight-Shift-Control Aircraft. i. ASTM Designation F 2426-05a, titled: Standard Guide on Wing Interface Documentation for Powered Parachute Aircraft. j. ASTM Designation F 2427-05a, titled: Standard Specification for Required Product Information to be Provided with Lighter-Than-Air Light Sport Aircraft. Availability These consensus standards are copyrighted by ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. Individual reprints of this standard (single or multiple copies, or special compilations and other related technical information) may be obtained by contacting ASTM at this address, or at

(610)832-9585 (phone),

(610)832-9555 (fax), through *service@astm.org* (e-mail), or through the ASTM Web site at *http://www.astm.org.* To inquire about standard content and/or membership, or about ASTM International Offices abroad, contact Daniel Schultz, Staff Manager for Committee F37 on Light Sport Aircraft:

(610)832-9716, *dschultz@astm.org.* Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on December 29, 2005. John Colomy, Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. E6-175 Filed 1-11-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-13-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration [Docket No. NHTSA-2005-23419; Notice 1] Optronics Products Company, Inc., Receipt of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance Optronics Products Company, Inc. (Optronics) has determined that certain combination lamps that it produced in 2002 do not comply with 49 CFR 571.108, Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 108, “Lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.” Optronics has filed an appropriate report pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, “Defect and Noncompliance Reports.” Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h), Optronics has petitioned for an exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. This notice of receipt of Optronics' petition is published under 49 U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any agency decision or other exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition. Affected are a total of approximately 6000 4-inch round LED 3 function combination lamps, part number STL45RK, produced in November 2002 and sold as replacement equipment for trailers less than 80 inches in overall width. NHTSA testing of this model showed that three out of the four tested lamps failed to meet the minimum photometry requirements for a 3-lighted section lamp. In particular, the lamps failed to meet the minimum zone 3 photometry requirements for the taillamp, stop lamp, and turn signal lamp. The FMVSS No. 108 minimum photometry requirement for zone 3 of these functions is 24 cd, 520 cd, and 520 cd, respectively. The lamps failed to meet the zonal requirements by a margin of 7% to 28% for the taillamp, and 4% to 18% for the stop and turn signal lamps. Optronics believes that the noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety and that no corrective action is warranted. Optronics states that, although the lamps noncomply with the requirements for a 3-lighted section lamp, they would meet or exceed the light output requirements if the lamps were tested to the requirements of “an incandescent light of the same fit, form, and function.” Optronics asserts that “[h]olding a 4-inch LED light to a higher standard than a 4-inch incandescent light is the result of definitions in the regulations and is not based on the relative safety of one light versus another.” The petitioner further states, [W]e believe that the lights' failure under the regulations is a technical issue and not a substantive one * * *. Consumers and Company's

(sic)should not be required to go through a product recall on a technicality. What is important here is the safety of the consumer. We believe that the data in this filing show that the lights are as safe as any incandescent on the road. Optronics states that there have been no accidents, injuries, fatalities, or warranty claims related to this noncompliance. Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the docket and notice number cited at the beginning of this notice and be submitted by any of the following methods. Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Nassif Building, Room PL-401, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC. It is requested, but not required, that two copies of the comments be provided. The Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. except Federal Holidays. Comments may be submitted electronically by logging onto the Docket Management System Web site at *http://dms.dot.gov.* Click on “Help” to obtain instructions for filing the document electronically. Comments may be faxed to 1-202-493-2251, or may be submitted to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: go to *http://www.regulations.gov.* Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. The petition, supporting materials, and all comments received before the close of business on the closing date indicated below will be filed and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials received after the closing date will also be filed and will be considered to the extent possible. When the petition is granted or denied, notice of the decision will be published in the **Federal Register** pursuant to the authority indicated below. *Comment closing date:* February 13, 2006. Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at CFR 1.50 and 501.8. Issued on: January 9, 2006. Daniel C. Smith, Associate Administrator for Enforcement. [FR Doc. E6-234 Filed 1-11-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-59-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Surface Transportation Board [STB Finance Docket No. 34807] Richard D. Robey—Continuance in Control Exemption—Susquehanna Valley Railroad Corporation and Stourbridge Railroad Company Richard D. Robey, a noncarrier individual, has filed a verified notice of exemption to continue in control of Susquehanna Valley Railroad Corporation (SVRC), a newly incorporated holding company, and Stourbridge Railroad Company (Stourbridge). The transaction was scheduled to be consummated on or after January 1, 2006. At the time of filing, Mr. Robey was the sole shareholder and owner of eight Class III railroads: Stourbridge, Juniata Valley Railroad Company, Lycoming Valley Railroad Company, Nittany & Bald Eagle Railroad Company, North Shore Railroad Company, Wellsboro & Corning Railroad Company, Union County Industrial Railroad Company, and Shamokin Valley Railroad Company. In a related transaction, SVRC has filed a verified notice of exemption to acquire control of all of the above Class III railroads, except Stourbridge, which Mr. Robey will continue to control directly. Mr. Robey states that:

(i)The railroads do not connect with each other or any railroads in their corporate family;

(ii)The continuance in control is not part of a series of anticipated transactions that would connect the railroads with each other or any other railroad in their corporate family; and

(iii)The transaction does not involve a Class I railroad. Therefore, the transaction is exempt from the prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 11323. *See* 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(2). Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g), the Board may not use its exemption authority to relieve a rail carrier of its statutory obligation to protect the interests of its employees. Section 11326(c), however, does not provide for labor protection for transactions under sections 11324 and 11325 that involve only Class III rail carriers. Accordingly, the Board may not impose labor protective conditions here, because all of the carriers involved are Class III carriers. If the notice contains false or misleading information, the exemption is void *ab initio.* Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically stay the transaction. An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB Finance Docket No. 34807, must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, 1925 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be served on: Richard R. Wilson, Esq., 127 Lexington Avenue, Ste. 100, Altoona, PA 16601. Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at *http://www.stb.dot.gov.* Decided: January 5, 2006. By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of Proceedings. Vernon A. Williams, Secretary. [FR Doc. E6-217 Filed 1-11-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4915-01-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Surface Transportation Board [STB Finance Docket No. 34808] Chicago Port Railroad Company—Operation Exemption—Ozinga Transportation Chicago Port Railroad Company (CPRR), a noncarrier, has filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to operate approximately 1.3 miles of rail line owned by Ozinga Transportation. The line consists of The Calumet River Yard and the Transload Facility trackage located adjacent to the Calumet River in Chicago, IL, and does not have milepost numbers. CPRR certifies that its projected annual revenues as a result of the transaction do not exceed those that would qualify it as a Class III rail carrier. The transaction was scheduled to be consummated prior to January 1, 2006, but consummation could lawfully occur no earlier than December 23, 2005, the effective date of the exemption (7 days after the exemption was filed). If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, the exemption is void *ab initio.* Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically stay the transaction. An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB Finance Docket No. 34808, must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, 1925 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be served on David C. Dillon, Dillon & Nash, Ltd., 111 West Washington Street, Suite 719, Chicago, IL 60602. Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at “ *http://www.stb.dot.gov.”* Decided: January 4, 2006. By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of Proceedings. Vernon A. Williams, Secretary. [FR Doc. 06-232 Filed 1-11-06; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 7

Traces to 7 documents

U.S. Code