Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

§
Marginalia
Code · REGISTER · 2005-12-15 · DEPARTMENT OF LABOR · Notices

Notices. Notice

11,443 words·~52 min read·/register/2005/12/15/05-24056·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of the Secretary Submission for OMB Review: Comment Request December 8, 2005. The Department of Labor
(DOL)has submitted the following public information collection request
(ICR)to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB)for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35). A copy of this ICR, with applicable supporting documentation, may be obtained by contacting Darrin King on 202-693-4129 (this is not a toll-free number) or e-mail: *king.darrin@dol.gov.* Comments should be sent to Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503, 202-395-7316 (this is not a toll-free number), within 30 days from the date of this publication in the **Federal Register** . The OMB is particularly interested in comments which: • Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; • Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; • Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and • Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, *e.g.* , permitting electronic submission of responses. *Agency:* Bureau of Labor Statistics. *Type of Review:* Extension of a currently approved collection. *Title:* Cognitive and Psychological Research. *OMB Number:* 1220-0141. *Type of Response:* Reporting. *Affected Public:* Individuals or households. *Frequency:* On occasion. *Estimated Number of Respondents:* 1,200. *Estimated Number of Annual Responses:* 1,200. *Average Response Time:* 60 minutes *Estimated Annual Burden Hours:* 1,200. *Total Annualized capital/startup costs:* $0. *Total Annual Costs (operating/maintaining systems or purchasing services):* $0. *Description:* The proposed laboratory research will be conducted from Fiscal Year
(FY)2006 through FY 2008 to enhance data quality in the Bureau of Labor Statistics' surveys. Improvements will be made by examining psychological and cognitive aspects of BLS's data collection procedures, including questionnaire design, interviewing procedures, collection modalities, and administrative technology. Darrin A. King, Acting Departmental Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. E5-7383 Filed 12-14-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-24-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, (19 U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers (TA-W) number and alternative trade adjustment assistance
(ATAA)by (TA-W) number issued during the periods of November 2005. In order for an affirmative determination to be made and a certification of eligibility to apply for directly-impacted (primary) worker adjustment assistance to be issued, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision have decreased absolutely; and C. increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. There has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or subdivision to a foreign county of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or subdivision; and C. One of the following must be satisfied: 1. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United States; 2. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act; or 3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are or were produced by such firm or subdivision. Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made and a certification of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance as an adversely affected secondary group to be issued, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met.
(1)Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers' firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2)The workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related to the article that was the basis for such certification; and
(3)Either—
(A)The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph
(2)accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or
(B)A loss or business by the workers' firm with the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph
(2)contributed importantly to the workers' separation or threat of separation. Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued; the date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
(A)(increased imports) of Section 222 have been met. *TA-W-57,896; Cranford Woodcarving, Inc., A Subsidiary of McCrorie Group, Plants 1, 4 and 7, On-Site Leased Workers of Express, Hickory, NC, September 2, 2004.* *TA-W-58,104; Tecstar, dba MGS Mfg. Group (The), On-Site Leased Workers, Germantown, WI, September 10, 2004.* *TA-W-58,120; Bangor Mills, Inc., Stroudsburg, PA, October 7, 2004.* * TA-W-58,121; Computernet, Inc., aka Computernet Resource Group, On- Site at Burlington Industries, Hurt, VA, October 10, 2004. * *TA-W-58,121A; Computernet, Inc., aka Computernet Resource Group, On-Site at Burlington Industries, Greensboro, NC, October 10, 2004.* *TA-W-58,131; Quality Oak Products, Inc., Including On-Site Leased Workers of Labor Specialists, Noble, IL, October 6, 2004.* *TA-W-58,145; General Cable, A Subsidiary of General Cable Technologies Corp., Dayville, CT, October 17, 2004.* *TA-W-58,181; Stimson Lumber Company, Atlas Division, Coeur d' Alene, ID, October 20, 2004.* *TA-W-58,256; T-Time Sportswear, Inc., Hazleton, PA, October 24, 2004.* *TA-W-58,357; JB Britches, Inc., San Fernando, CA, November 4, 2004.* *TA-W-58,215; Bespak, Inc., Apex, NC, October 25, 2004.* The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of (a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of Section 222 have been met. *TA-W-58,133; Joan Fabrics Corporation, Mastercraft Fabrics LLC, Norwood Yarn Sales, Norwood, NC, October 21, 2005.* *TA-W-58,133A; Joan Fabrics Corporation, Mastercraft Fabrics LLC, Norwood Yarn Sales, Troy, NC, October 21, 2005.* *TA-W-58,184; Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Consumer Products Division, Green Bay, WI, October 12, 2004.* *TA-W-58,190; Meridian Automotive Systems, Inc., Company 21, Grand Rapids, MI, October 21, 2004.* *TA-W-58,205; Berliss Bearing Co., Livingston, NJ, September 27, 2004.* *TA-W-58,226; Alcan Packaging—Cebal Americas, Division of Alcan, Inc., Cypress, CA, October 28, 2004.* *TA-W-58,340; Rolatape Corporation, Including Leased Workers of Humanix, Spokane, WA, November 10, 2004.* The following certification has been issued. The requirement of supplier to a trade certified firm has been met. *None* . The following certification has been issued. The requirement of downstream producer to a trade certified firm has been met. *None* . Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the criteria for eligibility have not been met for the reasons specified. The investigation revealed that criterion (a)(2)(A)(I.A) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A) (no employment decline) has not been met. *TA-W-58,137; BNZ Materials, Inc., Zelienople, PA.* *TA-W-58,183; Firestone Tube Company, A Subsidiary of Bridgestone, Firestone North America Tire, Russellville, AR.* *TA-W-58,207; Fiskars Home Leisure, A Subsidiary of Fiskars Corporation, Opelika, AL.* *TA-W-58,268; Simpson Door Company, McCleary Washington Division, McCleary, WA.* *TA-W-58,319; Johnco Hosiery, Inc., Fort Payne, AL.* *TA-W-58,324; Cherokee Hosiery Mills, Inc., Fort Payne, AL.* The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B) (No shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met. *TA-W-58,180; Ensign-Bickford Company (The), Trojan Explosives Plant, Booster—Utah Division, Spanish Fork, UT.* The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B) (No shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met. *TA-W-58,112; IMC Products, Inc., Muskegon, MI.* *TA-W-58,135; Snap-Tite Hose, Inc., National Fire Hose Plant, Compton, CA.* The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (Increased imports and (a)(2)(B)(II.C) (has shifted production to a foreign country) have not been met. *TA-W-58,150; Siemens Energy and Automation, Inc., Distribution Products Division, Bellefontaine, OH.* *TA-W-58,150A; Siemens Energy and Automation, Inc., Distribution Products Division, Urbana, OH.* The workers firm does not produce an article as required for certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974. *TA-W-58,121B; Computernet, Inc., aka Computernet Resource Group, On-Site at Burlington Industries, Stonewall, MS.* *TA-W-58,127; Alaska Airlines, Inc., Seattle/Tacoma International Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, Seattle, WA.* *TA-W-58,127A; Alaska Airlines, Inc., Anchorage International Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, Anchorage, AK.* *TA-W-58,127B; Alaska Airlines, Inc., Metropolitan Oakland International Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, Oakland, CA.* *TA-W-58,127C; Alaska Airlines, Inc., San Francisco International Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, San Francisco, CA.* *TA-W-58,127D; Alaska Airlines, Inc., Los Angeles International Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, Los Angeles, CA.* *TA-W-58,127E; Alaska Airlines, Inc., Juneau International Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, Juneau, AK.* *TA-W-58,127F; Alaska Airlines, Inc., Grant County International Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, Moses Lake, WA.* *TA-W-58,127G; Alaska Airlines, Inc., Snohomish County International Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, Everett, WA.* *TA-W-58,127H; Alaska Airlines, Inc., Will Rogers World Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, Oklahoma City, OK.* *TA-W-58,127I; Alaska Airlines, Inc., Wiley Post/W. Rogers M. Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, Barrow, AK.* *TA-W-58,127J; Alaska Airlines, Inc., Fairbanks International Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, Fairbanks, AK.* *TA-W-58,127K; Alaska Airlines, Inc., Ketchikan International Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, Ketchikan, AK.* *TA-W-58,127L; Alaska Airlines, Inc., Nome Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, Nome, AK.* *TA-W-58,127M; Alaska Airlines, Inc., Kotzebue Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, Kotzebue, AK.* *TA-W-58,127N; Alaska Airlines, Inc., Prudhoe Bay/Deadhorse Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, Prudhoe Bay, AK.* *TA-W-58,127O; Alaska Airlines, Inc., Sitka Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, Stika, AK.* *TA-W-58,127P; Alaska Airlines, Inc., Portland International Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, Portland, OR.* *TA-W-58,127Q; Alaska Airlines, Inc., Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, Phoenix, AZ.* *TA-W-58,128; Northwest Airlines, Technical Operations, Facilities Maintenance, and Ground Operations Division, St. Paul, MN.* *TA-W-58,128A; Northwest Airlines, Los Angeles International Airport, Los Angeles, CA.* *TA-W-58,128AA; Northwest Airlines, George Bush Intercontinental Airport, Huston, TX.* *TA-W-58,128B; Northwest Airlines, San Diego/Lindberg Field International Airport, San Diego, CA.* *TA-W-58,128BB; Northwest Airlines, Tampa/St. Petersburg International Airport, Tampa, FL.* *TA-W-58,128C; Northwest Airlines, Billings Airport, Billings, MT.* *TA-W-58,128CC; Northwest Airlines, McCarran International Airport, Las Vegas, NV.* *TA-W-58,128D; Northwest Airlines, Anchorage International Airport, Anchorage, AK.* *TA-W-58,128DD; Northwest Airlines, Northern Kentucky Airport, Cincinnati, OH.* *TA-W-58,128E; Northwest Airlines, Honolulu Airport, Honolulu, HI.* *TA-W-58,128EE; Northwest Airlines, General Mitchell Airport, Milwaukee, WI.* *TA-W-58,128F; Northwest Airlines, Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport, Minneapolis, MN.* *TA-W-58,128FF; Northwest Airlines, Hartsfield-Jackson Airport, Atlanta, GA.* *TA-W-58,128G; Northwest Airlines, Duluth International Airport, Duluth, MN.* *TA-W-58,128GG; Northwest Airlines, Memphis International Airport, Memphis, TN.* *TA-W-58,128H; Northwest Airlines, Sky Harbor Airport, Phoenix, AZ.* *TA-W-58,128HH; Northwest Airlines, New Orleans Airport, New Orleans, LA.* *TA-W-58,128I; Northwest Airlines, San Francisco International Airport, San Francisco, CA.* *TA-W-58,128J; Northwest Airlines, Seattle/Tacoma International Airport, Seattle, WA.* *TA-W-58,128K; Northwest Airlines, Portland International Airport, Portland, OR.* *TA-W-58,128L; Northwest Airlines, Newark International Airport, Newark, NJ.* *TA-W-58,128M; Northwest Airlines, John F. Kennedy International Airport, New York, NY.* *TA-W-58,128N; Northwest Airlines, La Guardia Airport, New York, NY.* *TA-W-58,128O; Northwest Airlines, Philadelphia International Airport, Philadelphia, PA.* *TA-W-58,128P; Northwest Airlines, Port Columbus International Airport, Columbus, OH.* *TA-W-58,128Q; Northwest Airlines, Logan International Airport, Boston, MA.* *TA-W-58,128R; Northwest Airlines, Detroit/Wayne County Airport, Detroit, MI.* *TA-W-58,128S; Northwest Airlines, Kansas City International Airport, Kansas City, KS.* *TA-W-58,128T; Northwest Airlines, Dallas-Ft. Worth International Airport, Dallas/Ft. Worth, TX.* *TA-W-58,128U; Northwest Airlines, Ronald Reagan National Airport, Washington, DC.* *TA-W-58,128V; Northwest Airlines, Dulles International Airport, Dulles, VA.* *TA-W-58,128W; Northwest Airlines, Orlando International Airport, Orlando, FL.* *TA-W-58,128X; Northwest Airlines, Miami International Airport, Miami, FL.* *TA-W-58,128Y; Northwest Airlines, Indianapolis International Airport, Indianapolis, IN.* *TA-W-58,128Z; Northwest Airlines, O'Hare International Airport, Chicago, IL.* *TA-W-58,154; Hewlett-Packard, Nashua, NH.* *TA-W-58,2TA-W-58,; ATA Airlines, Inc., Chicago Reservation Center, Chicago, IL.* The investigation revealed that criteria
(2)has not been met. The workers firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier or downstream producer to trade-affected companies. *None* . Affirmative Determinations for Alternative Trade Ajdustment Assistance In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issued a certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
(ATAA)for older workers, the group eligibility requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met. The following certifications have been issued; the date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determinations. In the following cases, it has been determined that the requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(ii) have been met. I. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are 50 years of age or older. II. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are not easily transferable. III. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry (i.e., conditions within the industry are adverse). *TA-W-58,104; Tecstar, dba MGS Mfg. Group (The), On-Site Leased Workers, Germantown, WI, September 10, 2004.* *TA-W-58,357; JB Britches, Inc., San Fernando, CA, November 4, 2004.* *TA-W-57,896; Cranford Woodcarving, Inc., A Subsidiary of McCrorie Group, Plants 1, 4 and 7, On-Site Leased Workers of Express, Hickory, NC, September 2, 2004.* *TA-W-58,120; Bangor Mills, Inc., Stroudsburg, PA, October 7, 2004.* *TA-W-58,215; Bespak, Inc., Apex, NC, October 25, 2004.* *TA-W-58,121; Computernet, Inc., aka Computernet Resource Group, On-Site at Burlington Industries, Hurt, VA, October 10, 2004.* *TA-W-58,121A; Computernet, Inc., aka Computernet Resource Group, On-Site at Burlington Industries, Greensboro, NC, October 10, 2004.* *TA-W-58,131; Quality Oak Products, Inc., Including On-Site Leased Workers of Labor Specialists, Noble, IL, October 6, 2004.* *TA-W-58,145; General Cable, A Subsidiary of General Cable Technologies Corp., Dayville, CT, October 17, 2004.* *TA-W-58,181; Stimson Lumber Company, Atlas Division, Coeur d' Alene, ID, October 20, 2004.* *TA-W-58,256; T-Time Sportswear, Inc., Hazleton, PA, October 24, 2004.* *TA-W-58,133; Joan Fabrics Corporation, Mastercraft Fabrics LLC, Norwood Yarn Sales, Norwood, NC, October 21, 2005.* *TA-W-58,133A; Joan Fabrics Corporation, Mastercraft Fabrics LLC, Norwood Yarn Sales, Troy, NC, October 21, 2005.* *TA-W-58,184; Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Consumer Products Division, Green Bay, WI, October 12, 2004.* *TA-W-58,190; Meridian Automotive Systems, Inc., Company 21, Grand Rapids, MI, October 21, 2004.* *TA-W-58,205; Berliss Bearing Co., Livingston, NJ, September 27, 2004.* Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issued a certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
(ATAA)for older workers, the group eligibility requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met. In the following cases, it has been determined that the requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(ii) have not been met for the reasons specified. Since the workers are denied eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA. *TA-W-58,137; BNZ Materials, Inc., Zelienople, PA.* *TA-W-58,268; Simpson Door Company, McCleary Washington Division, McCleary, WA.* *TA-W-58,180; Ensign-Bickford Company (The), Trojan Explosives Plant, Booster—Utah Division, Spanish Fork, UT.* *TA-W-58,112; IMC Products, Inc., Muskegon, MI.* *TA-W-58,135; Snap-Tite Hose, Inc., National Fire Hose Plant, Compton, CA.* *TA-W-58,121B; Computernet, Inc., aka Computernet Resource Group, On-Site at Burlington Industries, Stonewall, MS.* *TA-W-58,127; Alaska Airlines, Inc., Seattle/Tacoma International Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, Seattle, WA.* *TA-W-58,127A; Alaska Airlines, Inc., Anchorage International Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, Anchorage, AK.* *TA-W-58,127B; Alaska Airlines, Inc., Metropolitan Oakland International Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, Oakland, CA.* *TA-W-58,127C; Alaska Airlines, Inc., San Francisco International Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, San Francisco, CA.* *TA-W-58,127D; Alaska Airlines, Inc., Los Angeles International Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, Los Angeles, CA.* *TA-W-58,127E; Alaska Airlines, Inc., Juneau International Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, Juneau, AK.* *TA-W-58,127F; Alaska Airlines, Inc., Grant County International Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, Moses Lake, WA.* *TA-W-58,127G; Alaska Airlines, Inc., Snohomish County International Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, Everett, WA.* *TA-W-58,127H; Alaska Airlines, Inc., Will Rogers World Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, Oklahoma City, OK.* *TA-W-58,127I; Alaska Airlines, Inc., Wiley Post/W. Rogers M. Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, Barrow, AK.* *TA-W-58,127J; Alaska Airlines, Inc., Fairbanks International Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, Fairbanks, AK.* *TA-W-58,127K; Alaska Airlines, Inc., Ketchikan International Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, Ketchikan, AK.* *TA-W-58,127L; Alaska Airlines, Inc., Nome Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, Nome, AK.* *TA-W-58,127M; Alaska Airlines, Inc., Kotzebue Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, Kotzebue, AK.* *TA-W-58,127N; Alaska Airlines, Inc., Prudhoe Bay/Deadhorse Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, Prudhoe Bay, AK.* *TA-W-58,127O; Alaska Airlines, Inc., Sitka Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, Stika, AK.* *TA-W-58,127P; Alaska Airlines, Inc., Portland International Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, Portland, OR.* *TA-W-58,127Q; Alaska Airlines, Inc., Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, Aircraft Mechanics Department, Phoenix, AZ.* *TA-W-58,128; Northwest Airlines, Technical Operations, Facilities Maintenance, and Ground Operations Division, St. Paul, MN.* *TA-W-58,128A; Northwest Airlines, Los Angeles International Airport, Los Angeles, CA.* *TA-W-58,128AA; Northwest Airlines, George Bush Intercontinental Airport, Huston, TX.* *TA-W-58,128B; Northwest Airlines, San Diego/Lindberg Field International Airport, San Diego, CA.* *TA-W-58,128BB; Northwest Airlines, Tampa/St. Petersburg International Airport, Tampa, FL.* *TA-W-58,128C; Northwest Airlines, Billings Airport, Billings, MT.* *TA-W-58,128CC; Northwest Airlines, McCarran International Airport, Las Vegas, NV.* *TA-W-58,128D; Northwest Airlines, Anchorage International Airport, Anchorage, AK.* *TA-W-58,128DD; Northwest Airlines, Northern Kentucky Airport, Cincinnati, OH.* *TA-W-58,128E; Northwest Airlines, Honolulu Airport, Honolulu, HI.* *TA-W-58,128EE; Northwest Airlines, General Mitchell Airport, Milwaukee, WI.* *TA-W-58,128F; Northwest Airlines, Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport, Minneapolis, MN.* *TA-W-58,128FF; Northwest Airlines, Hartsfield-Jackson Airport, Atlanta, GA.* *TA-W-58,128G; Northwest Airlines, Duluth International Airport, Duluth, MN.* *TA-W-58,128GG; Northwest Airlines, Memphis International Airport, Memphis, TN.* *TA-W-58,128H; Northwest Airlines, Sky Harbor Airport, Phoenix, AZ.* *TA-W-58,128HH; Northwest Airlines, New Orleans Airport, New Orleans, LA.* *TA-W-58,128I; Northwest Airlines, San Francisco International Airport, San Francisco, CA.* *TA-W-58,128J; Northwest Airlines, Seattle/Tacoma International Airport, Seattle, WA.* *TA-W-58,128K; Northwest Airlines, Portland International Airport, Portland, OR.* *TA-W-58,128L; Northwest Airlines, Newark International Airport, Newark, NJ.* *TA-W-58,128M; Northwest Airlines, John F. Kennedy International Airport, New York, NY.* *TA-W-58,128N; Northwest Airlines, La Guardia Airport, New York, NY.* *TA-W-58,128O; Northwest Airlines, Philadelphia International Airport, Philadelphia, PA.* *TA-W-58,128P; Northwest Airlines, Port Columbus International Airport, Columbus, OH.* *TA-W-58,128Q; Northwest Airlines, Logan International Airport, Boston, MA.* *TA-W-58,128R; Northwest Airlines, Detroit/Wayne County Airport, Detroit, MI.* *TA-W-58,128S; Northwest Airlines, Kansas City International Airport, Kansas City, KS.* *TA-W-58,128T; Northwest Airlines, Dallas-Ft. Worth International Airport, Dallas/Ft. Worth, TX.* *TA-W-58,128U; Northwest Airlines, Ronald Reagan National Airport, Washington, DC.* *TA-W-58,128V; Northwest Airlines, Dulles International Airport, Dulles, VA.* *TA-W-58,128W; Northwest Airlines, Orlando International Airport, Orlando, FL.* *TA-W-58,128X; Northwest Airlines, Miami International Airport, Miami, FL.* *TA-W-58,128Y; Northwest Airlines, Indianapolis International Airport, Indianapolis, IN.* *TA-W-58,128Z; Northwest Airlines, O'Hare International Airport, Chicago, IL.* *TA-W-58,154; Hewlett-Packard, Nashua, NH.* *TA-W-58,258; ATA Airlines, Inc., Chicago Reservation Center, Chicago, IL.* *TA-W-58,321; McKeehan Hosiery Mill, Inc., A Subsidiary of Prewett Mills Distribution Center, Fort Payne, AL.* The Department has determined that criterion
(1)of Section 246 has not been met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of age or older. *None* . The Department has determined that criterion
(2)of Section 246 has not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily transferable. *None* . The Department has determined that criterion
(3)of Section 246 has not been met. Competition conditions within the workers' industry are not adverse. *None* . I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the month of November 2005. Copies of These determinations are available for inspection in Room C-5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 during normal business hours or will be mailed to persons who write to the above address. Dated: December 7, 2005. Erica R. Cantor, Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5-7380 Filed 12-14-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-58,041] Foampro Manufacturing, Inc. Including Workers Whose Wages Were Paid by Barrett Business Services, Irvine, CA; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and a Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on November 2, 2005, applicable to workers of FoamPro Manufacturing, Inc., Irvine, California. The notice was published in the **Federal Register** on November 23, 2005 (70 FR 70883). At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in the production of foam painting tools. Information provided by the company shows that Barrett Business Services was contracted by FoamPro Manufacturing, Inc. to provide payroll function services to workers on-site at the Irvine, California location of FoamPro Manufacturing, Inc. Information also shows that all workers separated from employment at the subject firm had their wages reported under a separate unemployment insurance
(UI)tax account for Barrett Business Services. Based on these findings, the Department is amending this certification to include workers whose wages were reported by Barrett Business Services at FoamPro Manufacturing, Inc., Irvine, California. The intent of the Department's certification is to include all workers of FoamPro Manufacturing, Inc. who were adversely affected by a shift in production of foam painting tools to Mexico. The amended notice applicable to TA-W-58,041 is hereby issued as follows: All workers of FoamPro Manufacturing, Inc., including workers whose wages were reported by Barrett Business Services, Irvine, California, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after September 28, 2004, through November 2, 2007, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974. I further determine that all workers of FoamPro Manufacturing, Inc., including workers whose wages were reported to Barrett Business Services, Irvine, California are denied eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974. Signed at Washington, DC, this 6th day of December 2005. Richard Church, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5-7377 Filed 12-14-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-57,793] GE Consumer Finance, a Division of the General Electric Company, Partnership Marketing Group, Schaumberg, IL; Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at GE Consumer Finance, a division of The General Electric Company, Partnership Marketing Group, Schaumburg, Illinois. The application did not contain new information supporting a conclusion that the determination was erroneous, and also did not provide a justification for reconsideration of the determination that was based on either mistaken facts or a misinterpretation of facts or of the law. Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued. TA-W-57,793; GE Consumer Finance, a division of The General Electric Company, Partnership Marketing Group, Schaumburg, Illinois (November 30, 2005). Signed at Washington, DC this 7th day of December 2005. Erica R. Cantor, Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5-7376 Filed 12-14-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Investigations Regarding Certifications of Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under Section 221
(a)of the Trade Act of 1974 (“the Act”) and are identified in the Appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to Section 221
(a)of the Act. The purpose of each of the investigations is to determine whether the workers are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title II, Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations will further relate, as appropriate, to the determination of the date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved. The petitioners or any other persons showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigations may request a public hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than December 27, 2005. Interested persons are invited to submit written comments regarding the subject matter of the investigations to the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than December 27, 2005. The petitions filed in this case are available for inspection at the Office of the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room C-5311, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. Signed at Washington, DC this 6th day of December 2005. Erica R. Cantor, Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. Appendix—29 TAA [Petitions instituted between 11/21/05 and 11/25/05] TA-W Subject firm (Petitioners) Location Date of institution Date of petition 58382 ICT Group (State) Skokane Valley, WA 11/21/05 11/09/05 58383 Diversco Integrated Services
(Comp)Lawrenceburg, TN 11/21/05 11/18/05 58384 Bekaert Corporation
(Comp)Dyersburg, TN 11/21/05 11/18/05 58385 American Remanufactures, Inc.
(Comp)Bedford, NH 11/21/05 11/18/05 58386 Shepherd Hardware Products, LLC
(Wkrs)Three Oaks, MI 11/21/05 11/16/05 58387 Koret of California, Inc.
(Wkrs)Oakland, CA 11/21/05 11/04/05 58388 Chuan Hing Sewing Co.
(Wkrs)San Francisco, CA 11/22/05 11/21/05 58389 Glass Group, Inc.
(USW)Millville, NJ 11/22/05 11/21/05 58390 JK Tool (State) Portageville, MO 11/22/05 11/21/05 58391 John Crane, Inc.
(Wkrs)Vandalia, IL 11/22/05 11/21/05 58392 InFocus Corp. (State) Wilsonville, OR 11/22/05 11/21/05 58393 E.J. Snyder and Company, Inc.
(Comp)Albemarle, NC 11/22/05 11/18/05 58394 Georgia-Pacific Corp.
(Comp)Old Town, ME 11/22/05 11/18/05 58395 Boeing Company
(UAW)Long Beach, CA 11/22/05 11/18/05 58396 Leesburg Knit Mill
(Comp)Leesburg, AL 11/22/05 11/21/05 58397 J.S. McCarthy Printers
(Wkrs)Augusta, ME 11/23/05 11/15/05 58398 Operations Centre
(Comp)Rockford, IL 11/23/05 11/22/05 58399 Applied Interconnect
(Comp)Sunnyvale, CA 11/23/05 11/11/05 58400 Moltech Corporation (State) Alachua, FL 11/23/05 11/22/05 58401 Accutech Mold and Engineering (State) Little Falls, MN 11/23/05 11/22/05 58402 Pressed Steel Tank
(Wkrs)West Allis, WI 11/23/05 11/22/05 58403 Integreo, Inc. (State) Tifton, GA 11/23/05 11/10/05 58404 Weston Food Ltd.
(Comp)West Hazleton, PA 11/23/05 11/22/05 58405 NSK Corporation
(UAW)Ann Arbor, MI 11/23/05 11/18/05 58406 Adobe Air (State) Phoenix, AZ 11/25/05 11/22/05 58407 Franklin Industries Company
(USWA)Franklin, PA 11/25/05 11/15/05 58408 United States Sugar Corporation
(Comp)Bryant, FL 11/25/05 11/21/05 58409 Shelby Automobiles, Inc.
(Comp)Las Vegas, NV 11/25/05 11/15/05 58410 SKF Sealing Solutions
(Comp)Springfield, SD 11/25/05 11/23/05 [FR Doc. E5-7381 Filed 12-14-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-53,433; TA-W-53,433A] International Resistive Company, Inc.; a Subsidiary of TT Electronics, PLC, Boone, NC, Including an Employee of International Resistive Company, Inc., a Subsidiary of TT Electronics, PLC, Boone, NC, Located in Athens, AL; Amended Notice of Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on December 5, 2003, applicable to workers of International Resistive Company, Inc., a subsidiary of TT Electronics, PLC, Boone, North Carolina. The notice was published in the **Federal Register** on January 16, 2004 (69 FR 2626). At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in the production of electronic resistive components. New information shows that a worker separation occurred involving an employee of the Boone, North Carolina facility of International Resistive Company, Inc. located in Athens, Alabama. Mr. Jack McDaniel provided support services for the production of electronic resistive components at the Boone, North Carolina location of the subject firm. Based on this new information, the Department is amending this certification to include an employee of the Boone, North Carolina facility of International Resistive Company, Inc., a subsidiary of TT Electronics, PLC, located in Athens, Alabama. The intent of the Department's certification is to include all workers of International Resistive Company, Inc., a subsidiary of TT Electronics, PLC, Boone, North Carolina, who was adversely affected by increased company imports. The amended notice applicable to TA-W-53,433 is hereby issued as follows: All workers of International Resistive Company, Inc., a subsidiary of TT Electronics, PLC, Boone, North Carolina (TA-W-53,433), including an employee of International Resistive Company, Inc., a subsidiary of TT Electronics, PLC, Boone, North Carolina, located in Athens, Alabama (TA-W-53,433A), who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after October 28, 2002 through December 5, 2005, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974. Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of December 2005. Linda G. Poole, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5-7375 Filed 12-14-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-57,700] Joy Technologies, Inc., DBA Joy Mining Machinery, Mt. Vernon Plant, Mt. Vernon, IL; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration By application of November 3, 2005, a petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, applicable to workers of the subject firm. The Notice of determination was signed on September 15, 2005, and published in the **Federal Register** on October 31, 2005 (70 FR 62345). The negative determination was based on no shift of underground mining machinery production abroad and no increased imports of underground mining machinery during the relevant period. Workers produced underground mining machinery and are not separately identifiable by product line. The Department carefully reviewed the workers' request for reconsideration and has determined that the Department will conduct further investigation based on new information provided by the petitioners. Conclusion After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted. Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of November 2005. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5-7379 Filed 12-14-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P NATIONAL CRIME PREVENTION AND PRIVACY COMPACT COUNCIL Security and Management Control Outsourcing Standard AGENCY: National Crime Prevention and Privacy Compact Council. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: Pursuant to the publication requirement in title 42, United States Code (U.S.C.), section 14616, Article VI(e), the Compact Council (Council), established by the National Crime Prevention and Privacy Compact (Compact) Act of 1998, is providing public notice of the attached combined Security and Management Control Outsourcing Standard (Outsourcing Standard) established by the Council. DATES: This Outsourcing Standard is effective on December 15, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd C. Commodore, FBI CJIS Division, 1000 Custer Hollow Road, Module C3, Clarksburg, WV 26306; Telephone
(304)625-2803; e-mail *tcommodo@leo.gov;* fax number
(304)625-5388. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background The Compact, 42 U.S.C., section 14616, establishes uniform standards and processes for the interstate and Federal-State exchange of criminal history records for noncriminal justice purposes. The Compact was approved by the Congress on October 9, 1998, (Pub. L. 105-251) and became effective on April 28, 1999, when ratified by the second state. Article VI of the Compact provides for a Council that has the authority to promulgate rules and procedures governing the use of the Interstate Identification Index
(III)System for noncriminal justice purposes. The III is the system of federal and state criminal history records maintained by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). On December 16, 2004, the Council published in the **Federal Register** , 69 FR 75243, an interim final rule entitled “Outsourcing of Noncriminal Justice Administrative Functions.” Published elsewhere in today's edition of the **Federal Register** , the interim final rule (codified at title 28, Code of Federal Regulations, part 906) is adopted as a final rule without change. On December 16, 2004, the Council published in the **Federal Register** , 69 FR 75350, a notice with request for comments. The notice provided two Security and Management Control Outsourcing Standards (Outsourcing Standards). The first Outsourcing Standard (“Security and Management Control Outsourcing Standard for Contractors Having Access to CHRI on Behalf of an Authorized Recipient for Noncriminal Justice Purposes”) was to be used by Contractors authorized to perform noncriminal justice administrative functions requiring access to CHRI without a direct connection to the FBI's CJIS Wide Area Network (WAN). The second Outsourcing Standard (“Security and Management Control Outsourcing Standard for Channelers Only”) was to be used by Contractors authorized access to CHRI through a direct connection to the FBI's CJIS WAN. At the May 2005 Council meeting, the Council approved a motion to consolidate the two Outsourcing Standards because they were so similar. Accordingly, the combined Outsourcing Standard is printed below. Hereafter, prior to utilizing the Outsourcing Standard, interested parties should request the most current version by contacting the Compact Council Office, 1000 Custer Hollow Road, Module C3, Clarksburg, WV 26306, Attention: FBI Compact Officer. II. Discussion of Comments on the Notice The 60-day comment period for the notice closed on February 14, 2005. Twelve comments were received from three different sources. All comments referenced particular sections of the notice. The first comment concerned the definition of “dissemination” as provided in section 1.12. The entity submitting the comment believed the definition was referring to “authorized dissemination” and it stated that the definition could be used interchangeably within the Outsourcing Standard to refer to both “authorized” and “unauthorized” dissemination. Based on previous discussion at the Council's Standards Committee meetings, the Council decided to leave the original definition of dissemination intact. The second comment addressed footnote 2 of section 2.01, which outlines audit requirements by the Compact Officer/Chief Administrator of the Contractor and Authorized Recipients. As the footnote was previously written, all Authorized Recipients and Contractors were to be audited within one year of the signing of the contract. The potential exists for outsourcing by thousands of Authorized Recipients. FBI and state audit resources are limited and it is not feasible to audit all potential Authorized Recipients and Contractors. However, auditing a representative sample is feasible. Accordingly, the Council agreed to revise footnote 2 to allow a representative sample of audits and defined the term “representative sample.” The third comment also dealt with section 2.01 and questioned whether the Authorized Recipient is to ask the Contractor if it has any security violations. Upon review, the Council agreed the language was ambiguous and therefore revised the language by adding the words “of the FBI Compact Officer” after the word “inquire” to clarify that the Authorized Recipient shall inquire of the FBI Compact Officer whether a prospective Contractor has any security violations. Comment four recommended amending section 2.02 by adding the words “or agreement” after the word “contract.” This language change is necessary for the federal community and would also make the wording consistent with similar wording in the Outsourcing Rule. The Council agreed to modify the language. The fifth comment suggested amending section 2.03 a. and footnote 4 by adding the words “or authorized” after the word “required” in section 2.03 a. and after the word “mandated” in footnote 4. The comment also suggested a corresponding change to section 6.01 by adding the words “or authorizes” after the word “requires.” Background checks could be authorized, mandated, or required. The Council agreed with the suggested language change and amended those provisions accordingly. Comment six addressed the second sentence of section 3.05. The individuals who are to provide notice of changes to federal and state laws, regulations, etc., were not identified; therefore, the Council modified the sentence to identify those individuals. Comment seven expressed a concern regarding section 3.06, specifically, the requirement of announced and unannounced security inspections. Potential Contractors suggested the section be amended to provide reasonable notice prior to audits, and to conduct those audits during normal operating hours so the Contractor could be sure to have appropriate staff on hand. Upon discussion, the Council believes that every effort will be made by the Authorized Recipient, the state, or the FBI to schedule audits in advance and during the Contractor's normal business hours; however, the Council wants to preserve the right to conduct unannounced audits. Therefore, the language in this section was not changed. Comment seven also suggested that section 3.06 be clarified so that Contractors would not be required to provide auditors with access to information unrelated to the Contractor's performance under the contract(s). The Council believes that Contractors will only have to provide relevant information and did not make any language changes. Comment eight suggested that section 3.07 be amended to make it clear that Contractors can limit access to information about their Security Program, particularly with respect to disclosures to authorized recipients. Contractors should be able to require, for example, that the policy be reviewed at the Contractor's offices and take other steps to further safeguard this sensitive security information. The Council, during its discussion, recognized a Contractor's desire to safeguard information about its Security Program; however, the Council concluded that the Authorized Recipient, the Compact Officer/Chief Administrator, and the FBI CJIS Division must be permitted to review the portion of the Contractor's Security Program that relates to the CJIS Security Policy to ensure necessary security measures are in place. Therefore, the Council decided to leave the existing language intact. Comment nine concerned the following sentence in Section 6.02: “If a local, state, or federal written standard requires a criminal history record check for support personnel, Contractors, and custodial workers who work in a physically secure location, then a criminal history record check shall be required for these individuals * * *.” The comment was made suggesting that the distinction between “support personnel, contractors, and custodial workers” and “Contractor personnel” could be more explicit. Accordingly, the Council revised this section by replacing the words “support personnel, contractors, and custodial workers” with “non-Contractor personnel.” Comment 10 concerned section 8.01 c. This section requires the Contractor to immediately notify the Authorized Recipient of any security violation. The comment concerning this section was that a Contractor has an obligation to report security breaches before they are “known.” The Council considered revising the section to require a Contractor to report any “known” security violations; however, the Council concluded that even if a security violation is unknown to the Contractor, there may be instances when the Contractor “should have known” of the security violation. Therefore, the Council decided to make no change to existing language. Comment 11 concerned Section 8.03 a. That Section provides: “Notwithstanding the actions taken by the State Compact Officer, if the Authorized Recipient fails to provide a written report notifying the State Compact Officer/Chief Administrator or the FBI Compact Officer of a security violation, or refuses to or is incapable of taking corrective action to successfully resolve a security violation, the Council or the United States Attorney General may suspend or terminate the exchange of CHRI with the Authorized Recipient pursuant to 28 CFR 906.2(d).” Comment 11 questioned whether this section is acknowledging that action may have been taken by the State Compact Officer. The Council reviewed the definition of “notwithstanding,” which may be defined as “despite.” In other words, if the State Compact Officer's actions do not result in compliance by the Authorized Recipient, then the Compact Council or the United States Attorney General may take action. The Council concluded the existing language is clear and should not be changed. The final comment, number 12, challenged the assertion in section 9.03 that the state Compact Officer has the authority to require more stringent security measures in the contract. The Council believes that the Compact Officer/Chief Administrator's explicit authority to approve an outsourcing initiative provides a corresponding authority to require more stringent security measures. Therefore, the Council approved adding the following sentence at the end of footnote 5: “The Compact Council, Authorized Recipients, and the Compact Officer/Chief Administrator have the explicit authority to require more stringent standards than those contained in the Outsourcing Standard.” Dated: November 23, 2005. Donna M. Uzzell, Compact Council Chairman. Attachment Security and Management Control Outsourcing Standard The goal of this document is to provide adequate security and integrity for criminal history record information
(CHRI)while under the control or management of an outsourced third party, the Contractor. Adequate security is defined in Office of Management and Budget Circular A-130 as “security commensurate with the risk and magnitude of harm resulting from the loss, misuse, or unauthorized access to or modification of information.” The intent of this Security and Management Control Outsourcing Standard (Outsourcing Standard) is to require that the Contractor maintain a security program consistent with Federal and State laws, regulations, and standards (including the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
(CJIS)Security Policy) as well as with rules, procedures, and standards established by the Compact Council and the United States Attorney General. This Outsourcing Standard identifies the duties and responsibilities with respect to adequate internal controls within the contractual relationship so that the security and integrity of the Interstate Identification Index
(III)System and CHRI are not compromised. The standard security program shall include consideration of site security, dissemination restrictions, personnel security, system security, and data security. The provisions of this Outsourcing Standard are established by the Compact Council pursuant to 28 CFR Part 906 and are subject to the scope of that rule. They apply to all personnel, systems, networks, and facilities supporting and/or acting on behalf of the Authorized Recipient of CHRI. Contractors authorized access to CHRI through a direct connection to the FBI's CJIS Wide Area Network
(WAN)must adhere to all applicable provisions of this Outsourcing Standard including the bolded portions. Contractors authorized to perform noncriminal justice administrative functions requiring access to CHRI without a direct connection to the FBI's CJIS WAN may ignore the bolded portions but must adhere to all other applicable provisions of this Outsourcing Standard. 1.0 Definitions 1.01 *Access to CHRI* means to use, exchange, retain/store, or view CHRI obtained from the III System but excludes direct access to the III System by computer terminal or other automated means by Contractors other than those that may be contracted by the FBI or state criminal history record repositories or as provided by title 42, United States Code, section 14614(b). 1.02 *Authorized Recipient* means
(1)a nongovernmental entity authorized by federal statute or federal executive order to receive CHRI for noncriminal justice purposes, or
(2)a government agency authorized by federal statute, federal executive order, or state statute which has been approved by the United States Attorney General to receive CHRI for noncriminal justice purposes. **1.03 ** Authorized Recipient's Information Security Officer **means the individual who shall ensure technical compliance with all applicable elements of this Outsourcing Standard.** 1.04 *Chief Administrator,* as referred to in Article I(2)(B) of the Compact, means the primary administrator of a Nonparty State's criminal history record repository or a designee of such administrator who is a regular full-time employee of the repository. 1.05 *CHRI,* as referred to in Article I(4) of the Compact, means information collected by criminal justice agencies on individuals consisting of identifiable descriptions and notations of arrests, detentions, indictments, or other formal criminal charges, and any disposition arising therefrom, including acquittal, sentencing, correctional supervision, or release; but does not include identification information such as fingerprint records if such information does not indicate involvement of the individual with the criminal justice system. 1.06 *Criminal History Record Check,* for purposes of this Outsourcing Standard only, means an authorized noncriminal justice fingerprint-based search of a state criminal history record repository and/or the FBI system. **1.07** CJIS Systems Agency, **as provided in Section 1.4 of the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
(CJIS)Division's Advisory Policy Board Bylaws, means a criminal justice agency which has overall responsibility for the administration and usage of CJIS Division Programs within a state, district, territory, or foreign country. This includes any federal agency that meets the definition and provides services to other federal agencies and/or whose users reside in multiple states or territories.** **1.08 ** CJIS Systems Officer, **as provided in Section 1.5 of the CJIS Advisory Policy Board Bylaws, means the individual employed by the CJIS Systems Agency who is responsible for monitoring system use, enforcing system discipline and security, and assuring that CJIS operating procedures are followed by all users as well as other related duties outlined by the user agreements with the FBI's CJIS Division. (This title was formerly referred to as the Control Terminal Officer or the Federal Service Coordinator).** 1.09 *Compact Officer,* as provided in Article I(2) of the Compact, means
(A)with respect to the Federal Government, an official [FBI Compact Officer] so designated by the Director of the FBI [to administer and enforce the compact among federal agencies], or
(B)with respect to a Party State, the chief administrator of the State's criminal history record repository or a designee of the chief administrator who is a regular full-time employee of the repository. 1.10 *Contractor* means a government agency, a private business, non-profit organization or individual, that is not itself an Authorized Recipient with respect to the particular noncriminal justice purpose, who has entered into a contract with an Authorized Recipient to perform noncriminal justice administrative functions requiring access to CHRI. **Under this Outsourcing Standard applicable to channelers, a Contractor includes one who has direct connectivity to the CJIS Wide Area Network
(WAN)for the purpose of electronic submission of fingerprints to and the receipt of CHRI from the FBI on behalf of an Authorized Recipient.** **1.11** Contractor's Security Officer **means the individual accountable for the management of the Contractor's security program.** 1.12 *Dissemination* means the disclosure of III CHRI by an Authorized Recipient to an authorized Contractor, or by the Contractor to another Authorized Recipient consistent with the Contractor's responsibilities and with limitations imposed by federal and state laws, regulations, and standards as well as rules, procedures, and standards established by the Compact Council and the United States Attorney General. 1.13 *Noncriminal Justice Administrative Functions* means the routine noncriminal justice administrative functions relating to the processing of CHRI, to include but not limited to the following: 1. Making fitness determinations/recommendations 2. Obtaining missing dispositions 3. Disseminating CHRI as authorized by Federal statute, Federal Executive Order, or State statute approved by the United States Attorney General 4. Other authorized activities relating to the general handling, use, and storage of CHRI 1.14 *Noncriminal Justice Purposes,* as provided in Article I(18) of the Compact, means uses of criminal history records for purposes authorized by federal or state law other than purposes relating to criminal justice activities, including employment suitability, licensing determinations, immigration and naturalization matters, and national security clearances. 1.15 *Outsourcing Standard* means a document approved by the Compact Council after consultation with the United States Attorney General which is to be incorporated by reference into a contract between an Authorized Recipient and a Contractor. The Outsourcing Standard authorizes access to CHRI, limits the use of the information to the purposes for which it is provided, prohibits retention and/or dissemination except as specifically authorized, ensures the security and confidentiality of the information, provides for audits and sanctions, provides conditions for termination of the contract, and contains such other provisions as the Compact Council may require. 1.16 *Physically Secure Location* means a location where access to CHRI can be obtained, and adequate protection is provided to prevent any unauthorized access to CHRI. 1.17 *Positive Identification,* as provided in Article I(20) of the Compact, means a determination, based upon a comparison of fingerprints 1 or other equally reliable biometric identification techniques, that the subject of a record search is the same person as the subject of a criminal history record or records indexed in the III System. Identifications based solely upon a comparison of subjects' names or other nonunique identification characteristics or numbers, or combinations thereof, shall not constitute positive identification. 1 The Compact Council currently defines positive identification for noncriminal justice purposes as identification based upon a qualifying ten-rolled or qualifying ten-flat fingerprint submission. Further information concerning positive identification may be obtained from the FBI Compact Council office. 1.18 *Public Carrier Network* means a telecommunications infrastructure consisting of network components that are not owned, operated, and managed solely by the agency using that network, i.e., any telecommunications infrastructure which supports public users other than those of the agency using that network. Examples of a public carrier network include but are not limited to the following: Dial-up and Internet connections, network connections to Verizon, network connections to AT&T, ATM Frame Relay clouds, wireless networks, wireless links, and cellular telephones. A public carrier network provides network services to the public; not just to the single agency using that network. 1.19 *Security Violation* means the failure to prevent or failure to institute safeguards to prevent access, use, retention, or dissemination of CHRI in violation of:
(A)Federal or state law, regulation, or Executive Order; or
(B)a rule, procedure, or standard established by the Compact Council and the United States Attorney General. 2.0 Responsibilities of the Authorized Recipient 2.01 Prior to engaging in outsourcing any noncriminal justice administrative functions, the Authorized Recipient shall:
(a)Request and receive written permission from
(1)the State Compact Officer/Chief Administrator 2 or
(2)the FBI Compact Officer 3 ;
(b)provide the Compact Officer/Chief Administrator copies of the specific authority for the outsourced work, criminal history record check requirements, and/or a copy of the contract as requested; and
(c)inquire of the FBI Compact Officer whether a prospective Contractor has any security violations (See Section 8.04). The FBI Compact Officer will report those findings to the Authorized Recipient and, when applicable, to the State Compact Officer/Chief Administrator. 2 The Compact Officer/Chief Administrator may not grant such permission unless he/she has implemented a combined state/federal audit program to, at a minimum, triennially audit a representative sample of the Contractors and Authorized Recipients engaging in outsourcing with the first of such audits to be conducted within one year of the signing of the contract. A representative sample will be based on generally accepted statistical sampling methods. 3 State or local Authorized Recipients based on State or Federal Statutes shall contact the State Compact Officer/Chief Administrator. Federal or Regulatory Agency Authorized Recipients shall contact the FBI Compact Officer. 2.02 The Authorized Recipient shall execute a contract or agreement prior to providing a Contractor access to CHRI. The contract shall, at a minimum, incorporate by reference and have appended thereto this Outsourcing Standard. 2.03 The Authorized Recipient shall, in those instances when the Contractor is to perform duties requiring access to CHRI, specify the terms and conditions of such access; limit the use of such information to the purposes for which it is provided; limit retention of the information to a period of time not to exceed that period of time the Authorized Recipient is permitted to retain such information; prohibit dissemination of the information except as specifically authorized by federal and state laws, regulations, and standards as well as with rules, procedures, and standards established by the Compact Council and the United States Attorney General; ensure the security and confidentiality of the information to include confirmation that the intended recipient is authorized to receive CHRI; provide for audits and sanctions; provide conditions for termination of the contract; maintain up-to-date records of Contractor personnel who have access to CHRI; and ensure that Contractor personnel comply with this Outsourcing Standard. a. The Authorized Recipient shall conduct criminal history record checks of Contractor personnel having access to CHRI if such checks are required or authorized of the Authorized Recipient's personnel having similar access. 4 4 If a national criminal history record check of government personnel having access to CHRI is mandated or authorized by a state statute approved by the Attorney General under Public Law 92-544, the State Compact Officer/Chief Administrator must ensure Contractor personnel having similar access are either covered by the existing law or that the existing law is amended to include such Contractor personnel prior to authorizing outsourcing initiatives. b. The Authorized Recipient shall ensure that the Contractor maintains site security. c The Authorized Recipient shall ensure that the most current version of both the Outsourcing Standard and the CJIS Security Policy are incorporated by reference at the time of contract and/or Option renewal. **d. The Authorized Recipient shall ensure that the Contractor establishes and administers an Information Technology
(IT)Security Program.** **e. The Authorized Recipient shall allow the FBI to periodically test the ability to penetrate the FBI's network through the external network connection or system.** **2.04 The Authorized Recipient shall understand the communications and record capabilities of the Contractor which has access to federal or state records through, or because of, its outsourcing relationship with the Authorized Recipient. The Authorized Recipient shall maintain an updated topological drawing which depicts the interconnectivity of the Contractor's network configuration.** 2.05 The Authorized Recipient is responsible for the actions of the Contractor and shall monitor the Contractor's compliance to the terms and conditions of the Outsourcing Standard. The Authorized Recipient shall certify to the Compact Officer/Chief Administrator that a compliance review was conducted with the Contractor within 90 days of execution of the contract. 2.06 The Authorized Recipient shall provide written notice of any early voluntary termination of the contract to the Compact Officer/Chief Administrator or the FBI Compact Officer. **2.07 The Authorized Recipient shall appoint an Information Security Officer. The Authorized Recipient's Information Security Officer shall:** **a. Serve as the security POC for the FBI CJIS Division Information Security Officer;** **b. Document technical compliance with this Outsourcing Standard; and** **c. Establish a security incident response and reporting procedure to discover, investigate, document, and report on major incidents that significantly endanger the security or integrity of the noncriminal justice agency systems to the CJIS Systems Officer and the FBI CJIS Division Information Security Officer.** 3.0 Responsibilities of the Contractor 3.01 The Contractor and its employees shall comply with all federal and state laws, regulations, and standards (including the CJIS Security Policy) as well as with rules, procedures, and standards established by the Compact Council and the United States Attorney General. **3.02 The Contractor shall develop and maintain an IT security program. The Contractor is therefore responsible to set, maintain, and enforce the following:** **a. Standards for the selection, supervision, and separation of personnel who have access to CHRI.** **b. Policy governing the operation of computers, access devices, circuits, hubs, routers, firewalls, and other components that comprise and support a telecommunications network and related CJIS systems used to process, store, or transmit CHRI.** 3.03 The Contractor shall develop and document a security program to comply with the current Outsourcing Standard and any revised or successor Outsourcing Standard. The Security Program shall describe the implementation of the security requirements described in this Outsourcing Standard, the associated Security Training Program, and the reporting guidelines for documenting and communicating security violations and corrective actions to the Authorized Recipient. The Security Program shall be subject to the approval of the Authorized Recipient. 3.04 The Contractor shall be accountable for the management of the Security Program. The Contractor shall be responsible for reporting all security violations of this Outsourcing Standard to the Authorized Recipient. 3.05 Except when the training requirement is retained by the Authorized Recipient, the Contractor shall develop a Security Training Program for all Contractor personnel with access to CHRI prior to their appointment/assignment. Immediate training shall be provided upon receipt of notice from the Compact Officer/Chief Administrator on any changes to federal and state laws, regulations, and standards as well as with rules, procedures, and standards established by the Compact Council and the United States Attorney General. Annual refresher training shall also be provided. The Contractor shall certify to the Authorized Recipient that the annual refresher training was completed for those Contractor personnel with access to CHRI. The Security Training Program shall be subject to the approval of the Authorized Recipient. 3.06 The Contractor shall make its facilities available for announced and unannounced security inspections performed by the Authorized Recipient, the state, or the FBI on behalf of the Compact Council. Such facilities are also subject to triennial audits by the state and the FBI on behalf of the Compact Council. An audit may also be conducted on a more frequent basis. 3.07 The Contractor's Security Program is subject to review by the Authorized Recipient, the Compact Officer/Chief Administrator, and the FBI CJIS Division. During this review, provision will be made to update the Security Program to address security violations and to ensure changes in policies and standards as well as changes in federal and state law are incorporated. 3.08 The Contractor shall maintain CHRI only for the period of time necessary to fulfill their contractual obligations but not to exceed the period of time that the Authorized Recipient is authorized to maintain and does maintain the CHRI. 3.09 The Contractor shall maintain a log of any dissemination of CHRI. 4.0 Site Security 4.01 The Authorized Recipient shall ensure that the Contractor site is a physically secure location at all times to protect against any unauthorized access to CHRI. **4.02 All visitors to computer centers and/or terminal areas shall be escorted by authorized personnel at all times.** 5.0 Dissemination **5.01 Only employees of the Contractor, employees of the Authorized Recipient, and such other persons as may be granted authorization by the Authorized Recipient shall be permitted access to the system.** **5.02 The Contractor shall maintain appropriate and reasonable quality assurance procedures.** **5.03 Access to the system shall be available only for official purposes consistent with the appended contract. Any dissemination of CHRI data to authorized employees of the Contractor is to be for official purposes only. ** **5.04 Information contained in or about the system will not be provided to agencies other than the Authorized Recipient or another entity which is specifically designated in the contract.** 5.05 The Contractor shall not disseminate CHRI without the consent of the Authorized Recipient, and as specifically authorized by federal and state laws, regulations, and standards as well as with rules, procedures, and standards established by the Compact Council and the United States Attorney General. 5.06 An up-to-date log concerning dissemination of CHRI shall be maintained by the Contractor for a minimum one year retention period. This log must clearly identify:
(A)The Authorized Recipient and the secondary recipient with unique identifiers,
(B)the record disseminated,
(C)the date of dissemination,
(D)the statutory authority for dissemination, and
(E)the means of dissemination. **5.07 The Contractor shall protect against any unauthorized persons gaining access to the equipment, any of the data, or the operational documentation for the system. In no event shall copies of messages or CHRI be disseminated other than as contracted and governed by this Outsourcing Standard.** **5.08 All access attempts are subject to recording and routine review for detection of inappropriate or illegal activity.** **5.09 The Contractor's system shall be supported by a well-written contingency plan.** 6.0 Personnel Security 6.01 If a local, state, or federal written standard requires or authorizes a criminal history record check of the Authorized Recipient's personnel with access to CHRI, then a criminal history record check shall be required of the Contractor's employees having access to CHRI. The criminal history record check of Contractor employees at a minimum will be no less stringent than the criminal history record check that is performed on the Authorized Recipient's personnel performing similar functions. Criminal history record checks must be completed prior to performing work under the contract. 6.02 If a local, state, or federal written standard requires a criminal history record check for non-Contractor personnel who work in a physically secure location, then a criminal history record check shall be required for these individuals, unless these individuals are escorted by authorized personnel at all times. The criminal history record check for these individuals at a minimum will be no less stringent than the criminal history record check that is performed on the Authorized Recipient's non-Contractor personnel performing similar functions. Criminal history record checks must be completed prior to performing work under the contract. 6.03 The Contractor shall ensure that each employee performing work under the contract is aware of the requirements of the Outsourcing Standard and the state and federal laws governing the security and integrity of CHRI. The Contractor shall confirm that each employee understands the Outsourcing Standard requirements and laws that apply to his/her responsibilities. 6.04 If a criminal history record check is required, the Contractor shall maintain a list of personnel who successfully completed the criminal history record check. 7.0 System Security 7.01 The Contractor's security system shall comply with the CJIS Security Policy in effect at the time the Outsourcing Standard is incorporated into the contract and with successor versions of the CJIS Security Policy as they are made known to the Contractor by the Authorized Recipient. a. If CHRI can be accessed by unauthorized personnel via Wide Area Network/Local Area Network or the Internet, then the Contractor shall protect the CHRI with firewall-type devices to prevent such unauthorized access. These devices shall implement a minimum firewall profile as specified by the CJIS Security Policy in order to provide a point of defense and a controlled and audited access to CHRI, both from inside and outside the networks. b. Data encryption shall be required throughout the network, passing CHRI through a shared public carrier network. 7.02 The Contractor shall provide for the secure storage and disposal of all hard copy and media associated with the system to prevent access by unauthorized personnel. a. CHRI shall be stored in a physically secure location. b. The Authorized Recipient shall ensure that a procedure is in place for sanitizing all fixed storage media ( *e.g.* , disks, drives, backup storage) at the completion of the contract and/or before it is returned for maintenance, disposal, or reuse. Sanitization procedures include overwriting the media and/or degaussing the media. 7.03 To prevent and/or detect unauthorized access to CHRI in transmission or storage, each Authorized Recipient must be identified by an Originating Agency Identifier
(ORI)or state assigned identifier, and each Contractor or sub-Contractor must be uniquely identified. 8.0 Security Violations 8.01 Duties of the Authorized Recipient and Contractor a. The Contractor shall develop and maintain a written policy for discipline of Contractor employees who violate the security provisions of the contract, which includes this Outsourcing Standard that is incorporated by reference. b. Pending investigation, the Contractor shall immediately suspend any employee who commits a security violation from assignments in which he/she has access to CHRI under the contract. c. The Contractor shall immediately notify the Authorized Recipient of any security violation or termination of the contract, to include unauthorized access to CHRI made available pursuant to the contract. Within five calendar days of such notification, the Contractor shall provide the Authorized Recipient a written report documenting such security violation, any corrective actions taken by the Contractor to resolve such violation, and the date, time, and summary of the prior notification. d. The Authorized Recipient shall immediately notify the State Compact Officer/Chief Administrator and the FBI Compact Officer of any security violation or termination of the contract, to include unauthorized access to CHRI made available pursuant to the contract. The Authorized Recipient shall provide a written report of any security violation (to include unauthorized access to CHRI by the Contractor) to the State Compact Officer/Chief Administrator, if applicable, and the FBI Compact Officer, within five calendar days of receipt of the written report from the Contractor. The written report must include any corrective actions taken by the Contractor and the Authorized Recipient to resolve such security violation. 8.02 Termination of the contract by the Authorized Recipient for security violations a. The contract is subject to termination by the Authorized Recipient for security violations involving CHRI obtained pursuant to the contract. b. The contract is subject to termination by the Authorized Recipient for the Contractor's failure to notify the Authorized Recipient of any security violation or to provide a written report concerning such violation. c. If the Contractor refuses to or is incapable of taking corrective actions to successfully resolve a security violation, the Authorized Recipient shall terminate the contract. 8.03 Suspension or termination of the exchange of CHRI for security violations a. Notwithstanding the actions taken by the State Compact Officer, if the Authorized Recipient fails to provide a written report notifying the State Compact Officer/Chief Administrator or the FBI Compact Officer of a security violation, or refuses to or is incapable of taking corrective action to successfully resolve a security violation, the Compact Council or the United States Attorney General may suspend or terminate the exchange of CHRI with the Authorized Recipient pursuant to 28 CFR § 906.2(d). b. If the exchange of CHRI is suspended, it may be reinstated after satisfactory written assurances have been provided to the Compact Council Chairman or the United States Attorney General by the Compact Officer/Chief Administrator, the Authorized Recipient and the Contractor that the security violation has been resolved. If the exchange of CHRI is terminated, the Contractor's records (including media) containing CHRI shall be immediately deleted or returned as specified by the Authorized Recipient. 8.04 The Authorized Recipient shall provide written notice (through the State Compact Officer/Chief Administrator if applicable) to the FBI Compact Officer of the following: a. The termination of a contract for security violations. b. Security violations involving the unauthorized access to CHRI. c. The Contractor's name and unique identification number, the nature of the security violation, whether the violation was intentional, and the number of times the violation occurred. 8.05 The Compact Officer/Chief Administrator, Compact Council and the United States Attorney General reserve the right to investigate or decline to investigate any report of unauthorized access to CHRI. 8.06 The Compact Officer/Chief Administrator, Compact Council, and the United States Attorney General reserve the right to audit the Authorized Recipient and the Contractor's operations and procedures at scheduled or unscheduled times. The Compact Council, the United States Attorney General, and the state are authorized to perform a final audit of the Contractor's systems after termination of the contract. 9.0 Miscellaneous Provisions 9.01 This Outsourcing Standard does not confer, grant, or authorize any rights, privileges, or obligations to any persons other than the Contractor, the Authorized Recipient, Compact Officer/Chief Administrator (where applicable), **CJIS Systems Agency** , and the FBI. 9.02 The following document is incorporated by reference and made part of this Outsourcing Standard:
(1)The CJIS Security Policy. 9.03 The terms set forth in this document do not constitute the sole understanding by and between the parties hereto; rather they provide a minimum basis for the security of the system and the CHRI accessed therefrom and it is understood that there may be terms and conditions of the appended contract which impose more stringent requirements upon the Contractor. 5 1 Such conditions could include additional audits, fees, or security requirements. The Compact Council, Authorized Recipients, and the Compact Officer/Chief Administrator have the explicit authority to require more stringent standards than those contained in the Outsourcing Standard. 9.04 The minimum security measures as outlined in this Outsourcing Standard may only be modified by the Compact Council. Conformance to such security measures may not be less stringent than stated in this Outsourcing Standard without the consent of the Compact Council in consultation with the United States Attorney General. 9.05 This Outsourcing Standard may only be modified by the Compact Council and may not be modified by the parties to the appended contract without the consent of the Compact Council. 9.06 Appropriate notices, assurances, and correspondence to the FBI Compact Officer, Compact Council, and the United States Attorney General required by Section 8.0 of this Outsourcing Standard shall be forwarded by First Class Mail to: FBI Compact Officer, 1000 Custer Hollow Road, Module C 3, Clarksburg, WV 26306. [FR Doc. 05-24056 Filed 12-14-05; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 2
6 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 104-13
  • 26 USC 2813
  • 29 CFR 90.18(C)
  • Pub. L. 105-251
  • 28 CFR 906
  • Pub. L. 92-544
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice
U.S.C.§ 2273
C.F.R.§ 906.2
Pub. L.Pub. L. 104-13
Cite26 USC 2813
Cite29 CFR 90.18(C)
Pub. L.Pub. L. 105-251
Cite28 CFR 906
Cites 8 · showing 7Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.