Notices. Notice

4,602 words·~21 min read·/register/2005/12/09/05-23837·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-52874; File No. SR-Amex-2005-097] Self-Regulatory Organizations; American Stock Exchange LLC; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating to the Amex Listing Agreement December 1, 2005. I. Introduction On September 29, 2005, the American Stock Exchange LLC (“Amex” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) a proposed rule change, pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) 1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, 2 to adopt a modified Amex Listing Agreement.

The proposed rule change was published for comment in the **Federal Register** on October 25, 2005. 3 The Commission received no comments on the proposal. This order approves the proposed rule change. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b-4. 3 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52630 (October 18, 2005), 70 FR 61670. II. Description of the Proposal The Exchange proposes to adopt a modified Amex Listing Agreement for the purpose of

(i)combining the two forms of Amex Listing Agreements presently available into one form of Amex Listing Agreement to be submitted to the Exchange by all issuers in connection with a listing application;

(ii)eliminating a representation by issuers of structured products, exchange-traded funds, trust issued receipts and other novel securities products regarding third party claims; and

(iii)making certain minor, non-substantive changes to the Amex Listing Agreement. III. Discussion After careful consideration, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change, as amended, is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange. 4 In particular, the Commission believes that the proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) 5 in particular, in that it is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between issuers or to regulate by virtue of any authority conferred by the Act matters not related to the purposes of the Act or the administration of the Exchange. 4 In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission has considered its impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. *See* 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). IV. Conclusion *It is therefore ordered* , pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, 6 that the proposed rule change (SR-Amex-2005-097) be, and it hereby is, approved. 6 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority. 7 7 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary. [FR Doc. E5-7102 Filed 12-8-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8010-01-P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-52855; File No. SR-CBOE-2005-96] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change to Extend a Pilot Program Relating to the Retail Automatic Execution System November 30, 2005. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”), 1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, 2 notice is hereby given that on November 15, 2005, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated (“CBOE” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by CBOE. The Exchange filed the proposal pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 3 and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder, 4 which renders the proposal effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b-4. 3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 4 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change CBOE proposes to extend a pilot program relating to the operation of CBOE's Retail Automatic Execution System (“RAES”) until November 30, 2006 to allow broker-dealer orders that are eligible for execution on RAES pursuant to CBOE Rule 6.8, Interpretation and Policy .01 to automatically execute against customer limit orders on CBOE's book in classes designated by the appropriate Floor Procedure Committee (“Pilot”). The text of the proposed rule change is available on CBOE's Web site ( *http://www.cboe.com* ), at CBOE's Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, CBOE included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. CBOE has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The purpose of this filing is to extend the Pilot until November 30, 2006. The Pilot was originally approved on May 13, 2004, with an expiration date of November 30, 2004, 5 and is currently extended for one year to November 30, 2005. 6 5 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 49699 (May 13, 2004), 69 FR 28958 (May 19, 2004) (SR-CBOE-2003-42). 6 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50779 (December 1, 2004), 69 FR 71087 (December 8, 2004) (SR-CBOE-2004-78). The Exchange's RAES system was created to allow for the automatic execution of retail customer options orders against CBOE market makers at their disseminated prices. In 1999, the Exchange expanded the RAES system to allow incoming RAES orders to execute against customer limit orders on the CBOE book when such booked orders constitute CBOE's best bid/offer. 7 The Exchange has allowed broker-dealer orders to be executed on RAES in classes designated by the appropriate Floor Procedure Committee. 8 The Pilot would allow these broker-dealer orders to automatically execute against the book. 7 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 41995 (October 8, 1999), 64 FR 56547 (October 20, 1999) (SR-CBOE-99-29). 8 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 45967 (May 20, 2002), 67 FR 37888 (May 30, 2002) (SR-CBOE-2002-22); 46113 (June 25, 2002), 67 FR 44486 (July 2, 2002) (SR-CBOE-2002-35); and 46598 (October 3, 2002), 67 FR 63478 (October 11, 2002) (SR-CBOE-2002-56). 2. Statutory Basis Because the proposed rule change will expand the number of orders eligible to trade automatically with booked customer limit orders, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act in general, 9 and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act in particular, 10 in that it is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. 9 15 U.S.C. 78f. 10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change will not impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule changes. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Because the foregoing proposed rule change:

(1)Does not significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest;

(2)does not impose any significant burden on competition; and

(3)by its terms, does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of this filing, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, and because the Exchange provided the Commission with written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at least five days prior to the filing date, the proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 11 and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder. 12 11 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 12 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). The Exchange requests that the Commission waive the 30-day operative delay, as specified in Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii). 13 The Exchange believes that the waiver of this period is appropriate because the filing merely extends the Pilot that has been in effect since May 13, 2004 and because the Pilot affords automatic executions to a greater number of market participants. 13 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii). The Commission believes that it is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest to waive the 30-day operative delay and make this proposed rule change immediately effective. 14 The Commission believes that the waiver of the 30-day operative delay will allow the Exchange to continue, without interruption, the existing operation of its Pilot for an additional year, expiring on November 30, 2006. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. 14 For purposes only of accelerating the operative date of this proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. *See* 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission's Internet comment form ( *http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml* ); or • Send an e-mail to *rule-comments@sec.gov.* Please include File No. SR-CBOE-2005-96 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-9303. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2005-96. This file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site ( *http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml* ). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of CBOE. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2005-96 and should be submitted on or before December 30, 2005. For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority. 15 15 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary. [FR Doc. E5-7103 Filed 12-8-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8010-01-P SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Request The Social Security Administration

(SSA)publishes a list of information collection packages that requires clearance by the Office of Management and Budget

(OMB)in compliance with Public Law 104-13, the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, effective October 1, 1995. The information collection packages that may be included in this notice are for new information collections, approval of existing information collections, revisions to OMB-approved information collections, and extensions (no change) of OMB-approved information collections. SSA is soliciting comments on the accuracy of the Agency's burden estimate; the need for the information; its practical utility; ways to enhance its quality, utility, and clarity; and ways to minimize burden on respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Written comments and recommendations regarding the information collection(s) should be submitted to the OMB Desk Officer and the SSA Reports Clearance Officer. (OMB), Office of Management and Budget, Attn: Desk Officer for SSA. Fax: 202-395-6974. (SSA), Social Security Administration, DCFAM, Attn: Reports Clearance Officer. Fax: 410-965-6400. E-mail: *OPLM.RCO@ssa.gov.* The information collection listed below is pending at SSA and will be submitted to OMB within 60 days from the date of this notice. Therefore, your comments should be submitted to SSA within 60 days from the date of this publication. You can obtain a copy of the collection instrument by calling the SSA Reports Clearance Officer at 410-965-0454 or by e-mailing or faxing your request to the above e-mail address and fax number. Medicare Subsidy Quality Review Case Analysis Forms—20 CFR 418(b)(5)—0960-0707 Under the aegis of the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003, SSA will make Medicare Part D subsidy determinations for the Medicare Prescription Drug program for Medicare beneficiaries with limited income and resources. The subsidy determination is based on applicants' answers to questions about household size, income, and resources. This information is self-reported by applicants using form OMB No. 0960-0696 (SSA-1020), and thus, SSA needs a way to determine if this form is being completed accurately and completely and a way to validate its determination decisions. To this end, SSA will use the new Medicare Quality Review system to check the accuracy of the determination. In this system, SSA will conduct phone interviews with selected applicants and will confirm information such as household size, income, and resources. A questionnaire and several other forms will be used as part of the Medicare Quality Review System. The collection instruments, their descriptions, and burden information are listed in the table below. Note: This Notice is for the permanent approval of this collection, which was cleared by OMB temporarily through February 2006 as an emergency information collection. *Type of Request:* Extension of a currently approved information collection. Form number and name Description of form Number of respondents Frequency of response Average burden per response (minutes) Estimated annual burden (hours) SSA-9301 (Medicare Subsidy Quality Review Case Analysis Questionnaire) Telephone questionnaire which will be administered by SSA employees to applicants for Medicare Part D Subsidy. Includes questions about family size, marriage, income, assets, etc 10,000 1 35 5,833 SSA-9302 (Notice of Quality Review Acknowledgement Form for those with Phones) After receiving notice of the scheduled date/time of the telephone questionnaire, Part D applicants will return this form confirming their availability for the interview and making note of any special needs for the call 10,000 1 15 2,500 SSA-9303 (Notice of Quality Review Acknowledgement Form for those without Phones) Same as for SSA-9302, except used by participants without phones or whose phone numbers are not known by SSA. On form SSA-9303, however, participants confirm receipt of the letter and are asked to call SSA on a specified date 1,000 1 15 250 SSA-9304 (Checklist of Required Information) This checklist, which accompanies forms SSA-9302 and SSA-9303, is a list of the documentation respondents are supposed to have prepared when SSA calls them to conduct the Quality Review phone interview. Their burden is accounted for in the burdens for forms SSA-9302 and SSA-9303 SSA-9308 (Request for Information) Form which SSA will send to various third parties to obtain/confirm information reported by beneficiaries 20,000 1 15 5,000 SSA-9310 (Request for Documents) Following the phone interview, SSA sends this notice to the participants advising them of the documents they must return to SSA 10,000 1 5 833 SSA-9309 (Life Insurance Verification Form) Form completed by insurance companies confirming type, face value, cash surrender value and dividends for insurance policies of applicants for Medicare Part D subsidy 8,000 1 15 2,000 SSA-8510 (Authorization to the Social Security Administration to Obtain Personal Information) Beneficiaries give their permission for SSA to contact third parties to obtain/confirm information 10,000 1 5 833 Total 69,000 17,249 *Total Estimated Annual Burden:* 17,249 hours. Dated: December 2, 2005. Elizabeth A. Davidson, Reports Clearance Officer, Social Security Administration. [FR Doc. E5-7111 Filed 12-8-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4191-02-P SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Notice Announcing Addresses for Service of Process AGENCY: Social Security Administration (SSA). ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: As set forth in a **Federal Register** rule in the Rules and Regulations section, we have amended our rules regarding service of legal process in lawsuits involving judicial review of Agency final decisions on individual claims for benefits under titles II, VIII, and/or XVI of the Social Security Act. Under the new rules, summonses and complaints in these types of cases should be mailed directly to the office in SSA's Office of the General Counsel

(OGC)that is responsible for the processing and handling of litigation in the particular jurisdiction in which the complaint has been filed. The names and current addresses of those offices, and the jurisdictions for which they are currently responsible, are detailed in this Notice. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lawrence A. Levey, Office of the General Counsel, Office of Program Law, Social Security Administration, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235-6401,

(410)965-3460. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with our revised procedures, as codified at 20 CFR 423.1 and published in the Rules and Regulations section, summonses and complaints in cases involving judicial review of Agency final decisions on individual claims for benefits under titles II, VIII, and/or XVI of the Social Security Act should be mailed directly to the office in SSA's Office of the General Counsel that is responsible for the processing and handling of litigation in the particular jurisdiction in which the complaint has been filed. The jurisdictional responsibilities and the names and addresses of these offices are as follows: Jurisdictional Responsibilities of OGC Offices Alabama U.S. District Court—Middle District of Alabama: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Kansas City (Region VII). U.S. District Court—Northern District of Alabama: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Atlanta (Region IV). U.S. District Court—Southern District of Alabama: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Denver (Region VIII). Alaska U.S. District Court—Alaska: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Seattle (Region X). Arizona U.S. District Court—Arizona: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, San Francisco (Region IX). Arkansas U.S. District Court—Eastern District of Arkansas: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Dallas (Region VI). U.S. District Court—Western District of Arkansas: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Dallas (Region VI). California U.S. District Court—Central District of California: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, San Francisco (Region IX). U.S. District Court—Eastern District of California: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, San Francisco (Region IX). U.S. District Court—Northern District of California: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, San Francisco (Region IX). U.S. District Court—Southern District of California: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, San Francisco (Region IX). Colorado U.S. District Court—Colorado: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Denver (Region VIII). Connecticut U.S. District Court—Connecticut: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Boston (Region I). Delaware U.S. District Court—Delaware: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Philadelphia (Region III). District of Columbia U.S. District Court—District of Columbia: Office of Program Law, Baltimore. Florida U.S. District Court—Middle District of Florida: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Atlanta (Region IV). U.S. District Court—Northern District of Florida: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Kansas City (Region VII). U.S. District Court—Southern District of Florida: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Kansas City (Region VII). Georgia U.S. District Court—Middle District of Georgia: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Atlanta (Region IV). U.S. District Court—Northern District of Georgia: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Atlanta (Region IV). U.S. District Court—Southern District of Georgia: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Boston (Region I). Guam U.S. District Court—Guam: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, San Francisco (Region IX). Hawaii U.S. District Court—Hawaii: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, San Francisco (Region IX). Idaho U.S. District Court—Idaho: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Seattle (Region X). Illinois U.S. District Court—Central District of Illinois: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Chicago (Region V). U.S. District Court—Northern District of Illinois: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Chicago (Region V). U.S. District Court—Southern District of Illinois: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Chicago (Region V). Indiana U.S. District Court—Northern District of Indiana: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Chicago (Region V). U.S. District Court—Southern District of Indiana: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Chicago (Region V). Iowa U.S. District Court—Northern District of Iowa: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Kansas City (Region VII). U.S. District Court—Southern District of Iowa: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Kansas City (Region VII). Kansas U.S. District Court—Kansas: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Kansas City (Region VII). Kentucky U.S. District Court—Eastern District of Kentucky: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Atlanta (Region IV). U.S. District Court—Western District of Kentucky: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Atlanta (Region IV). Louisiana U.S. District Court—Eastern District of Louisiana: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Dallas (Region VI). U.S. District Court—Middle District of Louisiana: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Dallas (Region VI). U.S. District Court—Western District of Louisiana: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Dallas (Region VI). Maine U.S. District Court—Maine: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Boston (Region I). Maryland U.S. District Court—Maryland: Office of Program Law, Baltimore. Massachusetts U.S. District Court—Massachusetts: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Boston (Region I). Michigan U.S. District Court—Eastern District of Michigan: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Chicago (Region V). U.S. District Court—Western District of Michigan: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Chicago (Region V). Minnesota U.S. District Court—Minnesota: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Chicago (Region V). Mississippi U.S. District Court—Northern District of Mississippi: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Kansas City (Region VII). U.S. District Court—Southern District of Mississippi: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Boston (Region I). Missouri U.S. District Court—Eastern District of Missouri: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Kansas City (Region VII). U.S. District Court—Western District of Missouri: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Kansas City (Region VII). Montana U.S. District Court—Montana: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Denver (Region VIII). Nebraska U.S. District Court—Nebraska: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Kansas City (Region VII). Nevada U.S. District Court—Nevada: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, San Francisco (Region IX). New Hampshire U.S. District Court—New Hampshire: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Boston (Region I). New Jersey U.S. District Court—New Jersey: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, New York (Region II). New Mexico U.S. District Court—New Mexico: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Dallas (Region VI). New York U.S. District Court—Eastern District of New York: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, New York (Region II). U.S. District Court—Northern District of New York: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, New York (Region II). U.S. District Court—Southern District of New York: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, New York (Region II). U.S. District Court—Western District of New York: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, New York (Region II). North Carolina U.S. District Court—Eastern District of North Carolina: Office of Program Law, Baltimore. U.S. District Court—Middle District of North Carolina: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Boston (Region I). U.S. District Court—Western District of North Carolina: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Boston (Region I). North Dakota U.S. District Court—North Dakota: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Denver (Region VIII). Northern Mariana Islands U.S. District Court—Northern Mariana Islands: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, San Francisco (Region IX). Ohio U.S. District Court—Northern District of Ohio: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Chicago (Region V). U.S. District Court—Southern District of Ohio: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Chicago (Region V). Oklahoma U.S. District Court—Eastern District of Oklahoma: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Dallas (Region VI). U.S. District Court—Northern District of Oklahoma: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Dallas (Region VI). U.S. District Court—Western District of Oklahoma: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Dallas (Region VI). Oregon U.S. District Court—Oregon: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Seattle (Region X). Pennsylvania U.S. District Court—Eastern District of Pennsylvania: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Philadelphia (Region III). U.S. District Court—Middle District of Pennsylvania: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Philadelphia (Region III). U.S. District Court—Western District of Pennsylvania: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Philadelphia (Region III). Puerto Rico U.S. District Court—Puerto Rico: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Boston (Region I). Rhode Island U.S. District Court—Rhode Island: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Boston (Region I). South Carolina U.S. District Court—South Carolina: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Denver (Region VIII). South Dakota U.S. District Court—South Dakota: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Denver (Region VIII). Tennessee U.S. District Court—Eastern District of Tennessee: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Chicago (Region V). U.S. District Court—Middle District of Tennessee: Office of Program Law, Baltimore. U.S. District Court—Western District of Tennessee: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Kansas City (Region VII). Texas U.S. District Court—Eastern District of Texas: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Dallas (Region VI). U.S. District Court—Northern District of Texas: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Dallas (Region VI). U.S. District Court—Southern District of Texas: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Dallas (Region VI). U.S. District Court—Western District of Texas: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Dallas (Region VI). Utah U.S. District Court—Utah: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Denver (Region VIII). Vermont U.S. District Court—Vermont: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Boston (Region I). Virgin Islands U.S. District Court—Virgin Islands: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, New York (Region II). Virginia U.S. District Court—Eastern District of Virginia: Office of Program Law, Baltimore. U.S. District Court—Western District of Virginia: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Philadelphia (Region III). Washington U.S. District Court—Eastern District of Washington: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Seattle (Region X). U.S. District Court—Western District of Washington: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Seattle (Region X). West Virginia U.S. District Court—Northern District of West Virginia: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Philadelphia (Region III). U.S. District Court—Southern District of West Virginia: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Philadelphia (Region III). Wisconsin U.S. District Court—Eastern District of Wisconsin: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Chicago (Region V). U.S. District Court—Western District of Wisconsin: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Chicago (Region V). Wyoming U.S. District Court—Wyoming: Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Denver (Region VIII). Addresses of OGC Offices Office of Program Law Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 6401 Security Boulevard Room 617 Altmeyer Building Baltimore, MD 21235-6401. Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Region I Social Security Administration Room 625, JFK Federal Building Boston, MA 02203-0002. Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Region II Social Security Administration 26 Federal Plaza, Room 3904 New York, NY 10278-0004. Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Region III Social Security Administration P.O. Box 41777 Philadelphia, PA 19101-1777. Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Region IV Social Security Administration Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Suite 20T45 Atlanta, GA 30303-8920. Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Region V Social Security Administration 200 W. Adams Street, 30th Floor Chicago, IL 60606-5208. Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Region VI Social Security Administration 1301 Young Street, Room 430 Dallas, TX 75202-5433. Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Region VII Social Security Administration 601 East 12th Street, Room 535 Federal Office Building Kansas City, MO 64106-2898. Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Region VIII Social Security Administration 1961 Stout Street Byron G. Rogers Federal Office Building, Suite 1001-A Denver, CO 80294-3538. Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration 333 Market Street, Suite 1500, San Francisco, CA 94105-2102. Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Region X Social Security Administration 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2900 M/S 901 Seattle, WA 98104-7075. Dated: December 5, 2005. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security. [FR Doc. 05-23837 Filed 12-8-05; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 6

Traces to 6 documents

U.S. Code

CFR

3 references not yet in our index