Notices. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

5,619 words·~26 min read·/register/2005/12/02/05-23547

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-52824; File No. SR-CBOE-2005-69] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto To Delete Certain Exchange Rules, or Portions Thereof, Which Have Been Determined by the Exchange To Be Obsolete or Unnecessary November 22, 2005. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”), 1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, 2 notice is hereby given that on September 1, 2005, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated (“CBOE” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the CBOE.

On November 8, 2005, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposal. 3 The Exchange filed the proposed rule change, as amended, as a “non-controversial” rule change under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the Act, 4 which renders the proposal effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change, as amended, from interested persons. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b-4. 3 *See* Form 19b-4 dated November 8, 2005, which replaced the original filing in its entirety (“Amendment No. 1”). 4 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The CBOE proposes to delete certain rules, or portions thereof, which have been determined by the Exchange to be obsolete or unnecessary. The text of the proposed rule change is available on Exchange's Web site *(http://www.cboe.com)* , at the CBOE's Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the CBOE included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change.

The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The CBOE has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to delete the rules, or portions thereof, that pertain to the former Joint Venture Participation Agreement (“Agreement”) between CBOE and the Chicago Board of Trade (“CBOT”).

The Exchange represents that the Agreement, among other things, provided that CBOE would waive certain dues and fees for CBOT Exercise members who made no trades in CBOE contracts in a given quarter. In addition, the Agreement waived all membership application fees and technology fees for CBOT Exercise members. The Exchange represents that the Agreement terminated on December 29, 1998, and the Exchange has no intention of initiating this program in the future. On December 10, 1998, CBOE issued Regulatory Circular RG98-140 to its members informing them that the Agreement would terminate effective December 29, 1998 and that the Agreement would not be renewed.

In addition, the Commission issued Securities Exchange Act Release No. 40973, which pertained to the termination of the Agreement and the initiation of fees that would ultimately be charged to the CBOT Exercise members pursuant to the termination of the Agreement. 5 The proposed CBOE rules that pertain to the obsolete Agreement, or the portions thereof, that are to be deleted are: CBOE Rule 1.1, Rule 6.7, Rule 6.20, Rule 6.70, Rule 9.1, Rule 19.1, and Rule 30.12. 5 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 40973 (January 25, 1999), 64 FR 4915 (February 1, 1999) (SR-CBOE-98-55).

Also, the Exchange proposes to delete the rules, or portions thereof, that pertain to Board Brokers. A Board Broker is an individual member, a nominee of a member organization or a member organization who or which is registered with the Exchange for the purposes of

(i)acting as a “broker's broker” for specified classes of options, at the post at which such classes of options are traded, by accepting and attempting to execute orders placed with him by other members, and

(ii)monitoring the market for such classes of options at the post. The Exchange represents that it has not used Board Brokers for approximately 22 years, and does not intend to use them in the future. The proposed CBOE rules pertaining to Board Brokers, or the portions thereof, that are to be deleted are: CBOE Rule 6.43, Rule 6.46, Rule 6.47, Rule 6.54, Rule 6.70, Rule 7.1, Rule 7.2, Rule 7.3, Rule 7.4, Rule 7.5, Rule 7.7, Rule 7.8, Rule 7.9, Rule 7.10, and Rule 7.11. In addition to the deletions of the above-referenced “Joint Venture” and “Board Broker” rules, or portions thereof, the Exchange proposes to delete each of the following rules, or portions thereof: • CBOE Rule 2.21—This rule allows the Exchange to impose a charge upon Exchange members measured by their respective net commissions. The Exchange represents that Exchange members have not assessed the commissions that such charges are measured by since the early 1970s, and such commissions will not be assessed by Exchange members in the future. For this reason, the Exchange has not imposed and will not impose such charges upon its members, since there is no commission to base it upon, therefore making this rule obsolete and unnecessary. • CBOE Rule 2.25 and CBOE Rule 2.30—These rules allow the Exchange to assess fees for the delayed submission of trade information. Specifically, these rules allow the Exchange to assess fees to members who failed to submit trade information for at least 80% of all of that member's transactions. Currently, over 98% of all trade information is disseminated within one hour after the time of execution. The Exchange represents that it no longer assesses such fees, since 98% of all trade information is disseminated within one hour after the time of execution, and does not intend to assess them in the future. • CBOE Rule 14.2, CBOE Rule 14.3, and CBOE Rule 14.5—The rules in Chapter 14 of the CBOE rulebook were created for the purpose of charging and collecting commissions. Specifically, CBOE Rule 14.1 made it mandatory for commissions to be charged and collected upon the execution of all orders, for the accounts of members and non-members, of securities dealt on CBOE. CBOE Rule 14.1 stated that the commissions would be no less than the rates established by CBOE and such commissions shall be “net and free from any rebate, return, discount or allowance.” The Exchange represents that CBOE Rule 14.1 was deleted from CBOE's rules on May 15, 1975, since such fixed commissions would no longer be charged and would not be charged in the future. For this reason, at this time, the Exchange proposes to delete CBOE Rules 14.2, 14.3, and 14.5, since the Exchange believes that there is no need for these rules since they pertained specifically to the commissions discussed in CBOE Rule 14.1 and which are no longer necessary. Specifically, CBOE Rule 14.2 involves reciprocal arrangements. The Exchange states that reciprocal arrangements were agreements that brokers used with other brokers to permit such brokers to participate in the commissions that were generated from the execution of orders. The Exchange represents that reciprocal arrangements have not been used since the early 1970s. Specifically, CBOE Rule 14.2(a) states that any such arrangement had to be reported to CBOE and subject to CBOE's approval. CBOE Rule 14.2(b) states that no member, in consideration of the receipt of business, shall make any payments, or give up any work or give up any part of any commission to which such member is or will be entitled. Since such arrangements as described in CBOE Rule 14.2(b) were never permitted, the Exchange would not approve such arrangements pursuant to CBOE Rule 14.2(a), if and when an Exchange member reported such an arrangement to the Exchange. Further, since the commissions as discussed in CBOE Rule 14.1 are no longer charged, and have not been charged since the early 1970s, the Exchange believes that there is no need to have a rule pertaining to reciprocal arrangements, since the commissions that the arrangements were based on are no longer charged and will not be charged in the future. Specifically, CBOE Rule 14.2 prohibited those arrangements that were used to circumvent the commissions referred to in CBOE Rule 14.1, and therefore, since CBOE Rule 14.1 was deleted on May 15, 1975, there is no need for CBOE Rule 14.2. CBOE Rule 14.3 deals with commissions charged on non-member orders. This rule specifically sets forth that the commissions to be charged on non-member orders shall be mutually agreed upon. Again, the Exchange represents that this rule is obsolete, since the commissions that this rule pertains to are no longer charged and have not been charged since the early 1970s. Therefore, the Exchange believes that there is no need for this rule. CBOE Rule 14.5 deals with intra-member rates for floor brokerage. This rule states that for those orders that are executed when a principal is given up, the commission shall be mutually agreed upon. As with CBOE Rule 14.3, the Exchange believes that this rule is obsolete, since the commissions that this rule pertains to have not been charged since the early 1970s and the Exchange does not plan to charge such commissions in the future. For this reason, the Exchange believes that there is no need for this rule. • CBOE Rule 15.4—This rule pertains to a monthly commission report that the Exchange required certain individual members and member organizations to submit to the Treasurer of the Exchange. Specifically, this rule required certain members to disclose commissions on business done on the Exchange for each month. The Exchange believes that this rule is obsolete, since such a report is no longer necessary given that such commissions are no longer charged and collected. 2. Statutory Basis By deleting certain Exchange rules, or portions thereof, which have been determined to be obsolete or unnecessary, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act 6 in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 7 in particular, in that it should promote just and equitable principles of trade, serve to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and national market system, and, in general, protect investors and the public interest. 6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition The CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others Written comments on the proposed rule change were neither solicited nor received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Because the proposed rule change, as amended:

(i)Does not significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest;

(ii)does not impose any significant burden on competition; and

(iii)by its terms, does not become operative for 30 days after the date of filing, the proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 8 and subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder. 9 As required under Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii), 10 the Exchange provided the Commission with written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least five business days prior to the date of the filing of the proposed rule change. 8 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 9 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). 10 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii). At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in the furtherance of the purposes of the Act. 11 11 The effective date of Amendment No. 1 is November 8, 2005. For purposes of calculating the 60-day period within which the Commission may summarily abrogate the proposal, the Commission considers the period to commence on November 8, 2005, the date on which the Exchange submitted Amendment No. 1. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission's Internet comment form ( *http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml* ); or • Send an e-mail to *rule-comments@sec.gov.* Please include File Number SR-CBOE-2005-69 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-9309. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2005-69. This file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site ( *http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml* ). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Section. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the CBOE. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2005-69 and should be submitted on or before December 23, 2005. For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority. 12 12 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary. [FR Doc. E5-6751 Filed 12-1-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8010-01-P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-52838; File No. SR-NYSE-2005-66] Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange, Inc.; Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto To Amend Rule 460 (Specialists Participating in Contests) November 28, 2005. I. Introduction On September 29, 2005, the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (“NYSE” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) a proposed rule change, pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) 1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, 2 to amend NYSE Rule 460 (Specialists Participating in Contests). On October 25, 2005, the NYSE amended the proposed rule change. The proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, was published for comment in the **Federal Register** on November 3, 2005. 3 The Commission received no comments on the proposal. This order grants accelerated approval to the proposed rule change, as amended. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b-4. 3 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52688 (October 27, 2005), 70 FR 66879. II. Description of the Proposal The Exchange proposes to add an exemption to NYSE Rule 460, which generally restricts business transactions between a specialist or his affiliates and any company in whose stock the specialist is registered. The exemption, in new NYSE rule 460.25, would apply to business transactions between a specialist or his affiliates and the sponsor of any Exchange Traded Funds (“ETFs”) in which the specialist is registered. For purposes of the proposed rule, ETFs are Investment Company Units (defined in paragraph 703.16 of the Exchange's Listed Company Manual), Trust Issued Receipts, such as HOLDRs (defined in NYSE Rule 1200), and derivative instruments based on one or more securities, currencies or commodities. Since ETFs are based on derivatives or indices representing multiple securities, or a single commodity or currency, and the specialist registered to that ETF is not a market maker in any of the underlying component securities, commodities or currencies, the Exchange believes that any potential for conflicts which might have an undue influence or impact on the ETF trading price is removed. Furthermore, while the ETF sponsor generally oversees the performance of the trustee of the ETF and the trust's principal service providers, the trustee is responsible for the day-to-day administration of the trust. The rule would provide that any fee or other compensation paid in connection with the business transaction to a specialist or his affiliates not have any relationship to the trading price or daily trading volume of the ETF. The rule also would provide that a specialist or his affiliates must notify and provide a full description to the Exchange of any business transaction or relationship it may have with any sponsor of an ETF in which the specialist is registered, except those of a routine and generally available nature. The Exchange requested accelerated approval of the proposed rule change on November 25, 2005, prior to the thirtieth day after the date of publication of the notice in the **Federal Register** . 4 4 Telephone conference between Donald Siemer, Director, NYSE, and Florence E. Harmon, Senior Special Counsel, Division of Market Regulation, Commission, on November 21, 2005. III. Discussion After careful consideration, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change, as amended, is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange. 5 In particular, the Commission believes that the proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, 6 in that it is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. 5 In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission has considered its impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. *See* 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). The Commission finds good cause, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, 7 for approving the proposed rule change prior to the thirtieth day after the date of publication of the notice in the **Federal Register** . The Commission notes that the proposal was noticed for the full 21-day comment period, and no comments were received. Accelerated approval will also accommodate the Exchange's trading of certain derivative products. 7 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). IV. Conclusion *It is therefore ordered,* pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, 8 that the proposed rule change (SR-NYSE-2005-66), as amended, be, and it hereby is, approved. 8 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority. 9 9 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary. [FR Doc. E5-6752 Filed 12-1-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8010-01-P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-52842; File No. SR-NYSE-2005-50] Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange Inc.; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating to Proposed Amendments to Rules 282 (Mandatory Buy-In), 284 (Procedure for Closing Defaulted Contract), 289 (Must Receive Delivery), and 290 (Defaulting Party May Deliver After Notice of Intention to Close) November 28, 2005. I. Introduction On July 15, 2005, the New York Stock Exchange Inc. (“NYSE”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) proposed rule change SR-NYSE-2005-50 pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”). 1 Notice of the proposed rule change was published in the **Federal Register** on September 28, 2005. 2 No comment letters were received. For the reasons discussed below, the Commission is approving the proposed rule change. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52475 (September 20, 2005), 70 FR 56757. II. Description The NYSE is amending NYSE Rules 282, 284, 289, and 290 to permit members and member organizations (collectively referred to as “member”) to initiate buy-ins, reduce the waiting period to initiate a buy-in from thirty days to three days, and to otherwise provide more standardized and consistent industry buy-in rules and procedures. Current Requirements NYSE Rule 282 sets forth the “mandatory buy-in” process by which a member acting as a buyer (“initiating member”) is required to close-out a contract that has not been completed by the member acting as the seller (“defaulting member”) for a period of thirty calendar days. A mandatory buy-in requires that a buy-in notice be delivered in triplicate by the initiating member (buyer) to the defaulting member (seller). The defaulting member receiving the buy-in notice must indicate on the buy-in notice its position with respect to the resolution of the failed trade ( *e.g.* , doesn't know the trade, knows the trade but cannot deliver, will deliver) and return the buy-in notice to the initiating member. If the buy-in notice is not returned when due or is returned with the indication that the contract is known but that delivery cannot be made, a “buy-in order” in duplicate is sent to the defaulting member for execution. NYSE Rule 284 sets forth a procedure by which an initiating member may close-out a contract that has not been completed by the defaulting member but that is not required to be closed-out. The initiating member must deliver a buy-in notice to the defaulting member prior to forty-five minutes after delivery time. Then the initiating member (buyer) must deliver a buy-in order to the defaulting member between 2:15 p.m. and 2:30 p.m. for execution after 2:35 p.m. NYSE Rule 289 requires an initiating member to accept physical delivery of some or all of the securities that are the subject of a buy-in, thereby halting the mandatory buy-in execution for those securities if the defaulting member tenders the securities prior to the mandatory buy-in deadlines. NYSE Rule 290 permits a defaulting member to deliver securities subject to a notice of buy-in until 2:30 p.m. on the day of the execution of the buy-in. The NYSE buy-in rules apply to transactions that are not subject to the rules of a qualified clearing agency such as The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”) and the National Securities Clearing Corporation (“NSCC”). In the event that a buy-in is sent to the NYSE floor for execution, then NYSE buy-in rules apply. However, under the current NYSE rules, there are inherent conflicts of interest by permitting the defaulting member to execute the buy-in. For example, the defaulting member could manipulate the extent to which it has market exposure by timing its purchase of the necessary securities to benefit itself. The initiating member may receive negative customer reaction if the customer learns that its trade has not settled and their securities are unavailable because a buy-in has not been executed by the defaulting member or has not been executed in a timely manner. Other self-regulatory organizations (“SROs”) have recognized this potential conflict and have adopted buy-in rules that assign responsibility to the initiating member to execute the buy-in. By allowing initiating members to execute their own buy-ins, any potential conflict of interest involving the defaulting member is avoided and the process is expedited. In the course of reviewing the operation of its buy-in rules, the NYSE and other regulators met with the Securities Industry Association's Securities Operations Division Buy-In Committee (“Committee”), which is comprised of regulators, broker-dealers, and industry groups, to identify and standardize various buy-in rules and procedures regarding the close-out process related to street-side contracts. The Committee requested that the NYSE amend the buy-in rules to eliminate the “Notice” procedures described above and to allow the initiating member (buyer) to execute buy-ins to close out a contract. Amendments 3 3 The specific changes to NYSE rules are attached as an exhibit to its rule filing which can be found on the Commission's Web site and on NYSE's Web site. The NYSE is effecting five amendments to its buy-in rules. First, the NYSE is amending Rule 282 to allow the initiating member to execute a mandatory buy-in and to reduce the waiting period to initiate a mandatory buy-in from thirty days to three days after delivery on the contract was due. The NYSE believes once the responsibility is shifted to the initiating member, the buy-in process will work more efficiently. Second, the NYSE is eliminating the requirement for duplicate and triplicate paper notices and is permitting electronic notices, including notices from a computerized network facility or from the electronic functionality of a qualified clearing agency, such as DTC and NSCC. The NYSE is also amending existing time deadlines for delivering notices, securities, and executions and is using those used by other self-regulatory organizations ( *i.e.* , DTC and NSCC). Third, the NYSE is adding a section to Rule 282's Supplementary Material to ensure that members comply with the closeout requirements of Regulation SHO. 4 Members are obligated to comply with the marking, locate, and delivery requirements of Regulation SHO for short sales of equity securities. As a result, members should have policies and procedures in place to comply with these rules, including closeout procedures. 4 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50103 (July 28, 2004), 69 FR 48008 (August 6, 2004), [File No. S7-23-03] (adoption of Regulation SHO). Fourth, the NYSE is rescinding Rule 284 and incorporating those “buy-in” procedures into Rule 282. The NYSE is also amending Rules 289 and 290 to clarify the requirements and timeframes upon which a defaulting member may deliver against a “buy-in” notice. Fifth, the NYSE is making certain technical amendments to Rules 282, 289, and 290 to better coordinate the rules with industry practice. III. Discussion Section 6(b)(5) of the Act requires that rules of an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect, and facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and to perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. 5 The Commission finds that the NYSE's proposed amendments to its buy-in rules should aid members in the clearance and settlement of their transactions by improving and making consistent with other self-regulatory organizations' rules its buy-in procedures. 5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). IV. Conclusion On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange. *It is therefore ordered* , pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-NYSE-2005-50) be, and it hereby is, approved. For the Commission by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority. 6 6 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary. [FR Doc. E5-6753 Filed 12-1-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8010-01-P DEPARTMENT OF STATE [Public Notice 5216] Notice of Meeting of the Cultural Property Advisory Committee In accordance with the provisions of the Convention on Cultural Property Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 2601 *et seq.* ) (the Act) there will be a meeting of the Cultural Property Advisory Committee on Thursday, December 15, 2005, from approximately 9 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., at the Department of State, Annex 44, Room 840, 301 4th St., SW., Washington, DC. At this meeting the Committee will conduct its ongoing review function with respect to the Memorandum of Understanding Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Republic of Bolivia Concerning the Imposition of Import Restrictions on Archaeological Material from the Pre-Columbian Cultures and Certain Ethnological Material from the Colonial and Republican Periods of Bolivia. This meeting is for the Committee to satisfy its ongoing review responsibility of the effectiveness of agreements pursuant to the Act and will focus its attention on Article II of the MOU. This is not a meeting to consider extension of the MOU. Such a meeting will be scheduled at the appropriate time in 2006 at which time a public session will be held. The Committee's responsibilities are carried out in accordance with provisions of the Convention on Cultural Property Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 2601 *et seq.* ). The U.S.-Bolivia MOU, the designated list of restricted categories, the text of the Act, and related information may be found at *http://exchanges.state.gov/culprop* . The meeting on December 15 will be closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B) and 19 U.S.C. 2605(h). Dated: November 21, 2005. Dina Habib Powell, Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. [FR Doc. E5-6779 Filed 12-1-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4710-05-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration [Docket: PHMSA-98-4957] Request for Public Comments and Office of Management and Budget

(OMB)Approval of an Existing Information Collection (2137-0589) AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), DOT. SUMMARY: This notice requests public participation in the Office of Management and Budget

(OMB)approval process regarding the renewal of an existing PHMSA collection of information for response plans for onshore oil pipelines. PHMSA is requesting OMB approval for renewal of this information collection under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. With this notice, PHMSA invites the public to submit comments over the next 60 days on ways to minimize the burden associated with collection of information related to response plans for onshore oil pipelines. DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before January 31, 2006. ADDRESSES: Comments should reference Docket No. PHMSA-98-4957 and may be submitted in the following ways: • DOT Web site: *http://dms.dot.gov* . To submit comments on the DOT electronic docket site, click “Comment/Submissions,” click “Continue,” fill in the requested information, click “Continue,” enter your comment, then click “Submit.” • Fax: 1-202-493-2251. • Mail: Docket Management System: U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, Room PL-401, Washington, DC 20590-0001. • Hand Delivery: DOT Docket Management System; Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. • E-Gov Web site: *http://www.Regulations.gov* . This site allows the public to enter comments on any **Federal Register** notice issued by any agency. *Instructions:* You should identify the docket number, PHMSA-98-4957, at the beginning of your comments. If you submit your comments by mail, you should submit two copies. If you wish to receive confirmation that PHMSA received your comments, you should include a self-addressed stamped postcard. Internet users may submit comments at *http://www.regulations.gov* , and may access all comments received by DOT at *http://dms.dot.gov* by performing a simple search for the docket number. **Note:** All comments will be posted without changes or edits to *http://dms.dot.gov* including any personal information provided. *Privacy Act Statement:* Anyone may search the electronic form of all comments received for any of our dockets. You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the **Federal Register** published on April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477-78) or you may visit *http://dms.dot.gov* . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Fuentevilla at

(202)366-6199, or by e-mail at *William.Fuentevilla@dot.gov* . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments are invited on whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Department, including whether the information will have practical utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimate of the burden of the proposed information collections; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. This information collection request pertains to 49 CFR part 194, Response Plans for Onshore Oil Pipelines. This rule requires an operator of an onshore oil pipeline facility to prepare and submit an oil spill response plan to PHMSA for review and approval when, because of its location, the facility could reasonably be expected to cause substantial harm to the environment if it were to discharge oil into navigable waters or adjoining shorelines. The rule established the planning requirements for oil spill response plans to reduce the environmental impact of oil discharged from onshore oil pipelines, as mandated by the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA 90). The rule provides greater specificity and guidance to facilities than is provided in OPA 90's statutory language in order to enhance private sector planning capabilities to minimize the impacts of oil spills from pipelines. The information collection required by the rule is the submission of response plans to PHMSA by affected pipeline operators. Additionally, operators must review and resubmit their response plans at least every 5 years, or in response to new or different operating conditions. Operators must submit any change or update to response plans within 30 days of making such a change. This information collection supports the DOT strategic goal of environmental stewardship by reducing pollution and other adverse environmental effects of transportation and transportation facilities. As used in this notice, “information collection” includes all work related to preparing and disseminating information related to this recordkeeping requirement including completing paperwork, gathering information and conducting telephone calls. *Type of Information Collection Request:* Renewal of Existing Collection. *Title of Information Collection:* Response Plans for Onshore Oil Pipelines. *Respondents:* 367 hazardous liquid pipeline facilities. *Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents:* 50,186 hours. Issued in Washington DC on November 28, 2005. Florence L. Hamn, Director of Regulations, Office of Pipeline Safety. [FR Doc. 05-23547 Filed 12-01-05; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 8

Traces to 8 documents

U.S. Code