Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2005-10-05 · Consumer Product Safety Commission · Notices

Notices. Notice

460 words·~2 min read·/register/2005/10/05/05-19891·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION Notification of Request for Extension of Approval of Information Collection Activity—Notification Requirements for Sound Levels of Toy Caps AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: In the July 20, 2005 **Federal Register** (70 FR 41690), the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC or Commission) published a notice in accordance with provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35) (PRA), to announce the agency's intention to seek extension of its PRA approval of information collection requirements regarding the sound levels of toy caps pursuant to 16 CFR 1500.18(a)(5). The Commission now announces that it has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget a request for extension of approval of that collection of information. The Commission received no comments. The CPSC will use the information it obtains to monitor industry efforts to reduce the sound levels of toy caps, and to ascertain which firms are currently manufacturing or importing toy caps with peak sound levels between 138 and 158 decibels.
Additional Information About the Request for Extension of Approval of Information Collection Activity *Title of information collection:* Notification Requirements for Sound Levels of Toy Caps. *Type of request:* Extension of approval. *Frequency of collection:* Reports will be collected 4 times per year. *General description of respondents:* Manufacturers or importers of toy caps. *Estimated number of respondents:* 10 per year. *Estimated average number of responses per respondent:* 4 per year. *Estimated number of responses for all respondents:* 40 per year. *Estimated number of hours per response:* 1 hour per year. *Estimated number of hours for all respondents:* 40 hours per year. *Estimated annual cost of collection to all respondents:* $1,023 per year. *Estimated total annual cost of the information collection requirements:* $8,800 per year. *Comments:* Comments on this request for extension of approval of an information collection activity should be submitted by November 4, 2005 to
(1)Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for CPSC, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503; telephone:
(202)395-7340, and
(2)the Office of the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, DC 20207. Comments may be sent by e-mail to *cpsc-os@cpsc.gov.* Comments may also be sent by facsimile to
(301)504-0127, or by mail to the Office of the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, DC 20207, telephone
(301)504-0800, or delivered to the Office of the Secretary, Room 502, 4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland 20814. Copies of this request for approval of an information collection activity are available from Linda L. Glatz, Management & Program Analyst, Office of Planning and Evaluation, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, D.C. 20207; telephone:
(301)504-7671. Dated: September 29, 2005. Todd Stevenson, Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission. [FR Doc. 05-19891 Filed 10-4-05; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.