Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2005-09-16 · Department of Defense (DoD) · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Final rule

414 words·~2 min read·/register/2005/09/16/05-18475·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 5001-08-P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 48 CFR Part 217 [DFARS Case 2004-D024] Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Multiyear Contracting AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD). ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: DoD has adopted as final, without change, an interim rule amending the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to implement Section 8008 of the Defense Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2005 and Section 814 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005.
Sections 8008 and 814 contain requirements related to the funding of multiyear contracts. DATES: Effective September 16, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Robin Schulze, Defense Acquisition Regulations Council, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(DAR), IMD 3C132, 3062 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3062. Telephone
(703)602-0326; facsimile
(703)602-0350. Please cite DFARS Case 2004-D024. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A. Background DoD published an interim rule at 70 FR 24323 on May 9, 2005, to implement Section 8008 of the Defense Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Pub. L. 108-287) and Section 814 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Pub. L. 108-375). Section 814 requires DoD to provide notice and supporting rationale to Congress before awarding a multiyear contract containing a cancellation ceiling exceeding $100 million that is not fully funded. Section 8008 places additional restrictions on the award of multiyear contracts for supplies using fiscal year 2005 appropriated funds. DoD received no comments on the interim rule. Therefore, DoD has adopted the interim rule as a final rule without change. This rule was not subject to Office of Management and Budget review under Executive Order 12866, dated September 30, 1993. B. Regulatory Flexibility Act DoD certifies that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, *et seq.* , because the rule addresses internal DoD planning, budgeting, and reporting requirements related to the award of multiyear contracts. C. Paperwork Reduction Act The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the rule does not impose any information collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501, *et seq.* List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 217 Government procurement. Michele P. Peterson, Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System. Interim Rule Adopted as Final Without Change Accordingly, the interim rule amending 48 CFR Part 217, which was published at 70 FR 24323 on May 9, 2005, is adopted as a final rule without change. [FR Doc. 05-18475 Filed 9-15-05; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 3
3 references not yet in our index
  • 48 CFR 217
  • Pub. L. 108-287
  • Pub. L. 108-375
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Final rule
Cite48 CFR 217
Pub. L.Pub. L. 108-287
Pub. L.Pub. L. 108-375
Cites 6Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.