Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2005-08-23 · Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Final rule; correction

489 words·~2 min read·/register/2005/08/23/05-16747

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 71 [Docket No. FAA-2005-20246; Airspace Docket No. 04-ASO-15] RIN 2120-AA66 Establishment of Area Navigation Instrument Flight Rules Terminal Transition Routes (RITTR); Charlotte, NC AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule; correction. SUMMARY: This action corrects errors in the legal descriptions of Area Navigation Instrument Flight Rules Terminal Transition Routes (RITTR) listed in a final rule published in the **Federal Register** on June 15, 2005 (70 FR 34649), Airspace Docket No. 04-ASO-15.
EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, September 1, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Gallant, Airspace and Rules, Office of System Operations Airspace and AIM, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone:
(202)267-8783. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: History On June 15, 2005, a final rule for Airspace Docket No. 04-ASO-15 was published in the **Federal Register** (70 FR 34649). This rule established four RITTR routes (T-200, T-201, T-202, and T-203) in the Charlotte, NC, terminal area. In all four routes, points that were listed in the route descriptions as “waypoint”
(WP)are actually existing published navigation “fixes.” Therefore, the descriptions are corrected by removing “WP” and substituting “Fix.” In addition, the descriptions for two of the routes contained an error in the geographic coordinates listed for one fix in each route. In route T-202, the latitude coordinate for the GANTS fix was published as 35°27′12″ N., while the correct point is 35°27′11″ N. In route T-203, the longitude coordinate for the LOCKS fix was published as 81°17′37″ W. The correct point is 81°17′33″ W. This action corrects those errors. Correction to Final Rule Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the legal descriptions for T-200, T-201, T-202 and T-203 as published in the **Federal Register** on June 15, 2005 (70 FR 34649), and incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1, are corrected as follows: PART 71—[Amended] § 71.1 [Amended] T-200 Foothills, GA to Florence, SC [Corrected] Foothills, GA (ODF), VORTAC, (lat. 34°41′45″ N., long. 83°17′52″ W.) RICHE, Fix, (lat. 34°41′54″ N., long. 80°59′23″ W.) Florence, SC (FLO), VORTAC, (lat. 34°13′59″ N., long. 79°39′26″ W.) T-201 Columbia, SC to JOTTA [Corrected] Columbia, SC (CAE), VORTAC, (lat. 33°51′26″ N., long. 81°03′14″ W.) HUSTN, Fix, (lat. 34°53′20″ N., long. 80°34′20″ W.) LOCAS, Fix, (lat. 35°12′05″ N., long. 80°26′45″ W.) JOTTA, Fix, (lat. 36°00′53″ N., long. 80°50′58″ W.) T-202 RICHE to GANTS [Corrected] RICHE, Fix, (lat. 34°41′54″ N., long. 80°59′23″ W.) HUSTN, Fix, (lat. 34°53′20″ N., long. 80°34′20″ W.) GANTS, Fix, (lat. 35°27′11″ N., long. 80°06′16″ W.) T-203 Columbia, SC to Pulaski, VA [Corrected] Columbia, SC (CAE), VORTAC, (lat. 33°51′26″ N., long. 81°03′14″ W.) LOCKS, Fix, (lat. 34°55′40″ N., long. 81°17′33″ W.) Barretts Mountain, NC (BZM), VOR/DME, (lat. 35°52′08″ N., long. 81°14′26″ W.) Pulaski, VA (PSK), VORTAC, (lat. 37°05′16″ N., long. 80°42′46″ W.) Issued in Washington, DC, on August 18, 2005. Edith V. Parish, Acting Manager, Airspace and Rules. [FR Doc. 05-16747 Filed 8-22-05; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 14 CFR 71
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Final rule; correction
Cite14 CFR 71
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.