Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2005-08-01 · PROPOSED RULES · Unknown

Unknown. Final rule

4,638 words·~21 min read·/register/2005/08/01/05-15167

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

--- schema: federal-register doc_type: fedreg source_file: FR-2005-08-01.xml --- 70 146 Monday, August 1, 2005 Contents Agricultural Agricultural Marketing Service RULES Peanuts, domestic and imported, marketed in United States; minimum quality and handling standards, 44043-44046 05-15167 Agriculture Agriculture Department See Agricultural Marketing Service See Rural Housing Service Alcohol Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives Bureau NOTICES Agency information collection activities; proposals, submissions, and approvals, 44117-44118 05-15122 Antitrust Antitrust Division NOTICES National cooperative research notifications:
Multi-Terabyte Tape Storage, 44118 05-15114 Traffic Audit Bureau, 44118 05-15113 VSI Alliance, 44118 05-15115 Children Children and Families Administration NOTICES Grants and cooperative agreements; availability, etc.: Child Development Associate Credentialing Program; correction, 44100 05-15163 Head Start programs— Head Start Family Literacy Project, 44101 05-15162 Commerce Commerce Department See Foreign-Trade Zones Board See Industry and Security Bureau See International Trade Administration See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOTICES Agency information collection activities; proposals, submissions, and approvals, 44083-44084 E5-4084 Copyright Copyright Office, Library of Congress RULES Copyrights:
Recordation of documents, 44049-44052 05-15137 Defense Defense Department PROPOSED RULES Acquisition regulations: Critical safety items; notification requirements, 44077-44078 05-15156 Energy Energy Department See Federal Energy Regulatory Commission EPA Environmental Protection Agency RULES Air quality implementation plans; approval and promulgation; various States: Colorado, 44052-44055 05-15054 Utah, 44055-44063 05-15150 Solid wastes: Waste management system; testing and monitoring activities; methods innovation Correction, 44150-44151 C5-10197 Superfund program:
National oil and hazardous substances contingency plan priorities list, 44063-44066 05-15151 PROPOSED RULES Air programs: Ambient air quality standards, national— Fine particulate matter; regional haze standards for Class I Federal areas, large national parks and wilderness areas, 44154-44175 05-14930 Air quality implementation plans; approval and promulgation; various States: Colorado, 44075 05-15053 Utah, 44075-44076 05-15149 Superfund program: National oil and hazardous substances contingency plan priorities list, 44076 05-15152 NOTICES Agency information collection activities; proposals, submissions, and approvals, 44095-44096 05-15146 Grants and cooperative agreements; availability, etc.:
Lead poisoning and baseline assessment of tribal children's existing and potential exposure to lead; tribal educational outreach, 44096-44097 05-15147 Executive Executive Office for Immigration Review NOTICES Agency information collection activities; proposals, submissions, and approvals, 44118-44119 05-15139 Executive Executive Office of the President See Management and Budget Office See Presidential Documents FAA Federal Aviation Administration RULES Airworthiness directives:
AvCraft Dornier, 44046-44048 05-14789 FDIC Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation NOTICES Privacy Act: Systems of records, 44097-44099 05-15108 Federal Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission NOTICES Electric rate and corporate regulation combined filings, 44092-44095 E5-4081 E5-4085 E5-4086 Federal Housing Federal Housing Finance Board NOTICES Agency information collection activities; proposals, submissions, and approvals, 44099-44100 05-15111 Federal Reserve Federal Reserve System NOTICES Change in bank control, 44100 05-15106 Formations, acquisitions, and mergers, 44100 05-15105 Fish Fish and Wildlife Service PROPOSED RULES Endangered and threatened species:
Critical habitat designations— Arkansas River shiner; Arkansas River Basin population, 44078-44082 05-15164 Migratory bird hunting: Various States; early-season migratory bird hunting regulations; meetings, 44200-44215 05-15127 Food Food and Drug Administration RULES Animal drugs, feeds, and related products: Enrofloxacin; approval withdrawn, 44048-44049 05-15223 Sponsor name and address changes— North American Nutrition Companies, Inc., 44049 05-15161 NOTICES Animal drugs, feeds, and related products:
Enrofloxacin; withdrawn, 44105 05-15224 Animal drug user fee rates and payment procedures, 44101-44104 05-15158 Medical devices: Medical device user fee rates; publication delay, 44105 05-15157 Prescription drug user fee rates; establishment, 44106-44109 05-15159 MISSING FOR: Foreign-Trade Zones Board Foreign-Trade Zones Board NOTICES *Applications, hearings, determinations, etc.:* Connecticut Pfizer, Inc.; pharmaceuticals/animal health products manufacturing facilities; correction, 44084 05-15093 Health Health and Human Services Department See Children and Families Administration See Food and Drug Administration Housing Housing and Urban Development Department NOTICES Agency information collection activities; proposals, submissions, and approvals, 44109 E5-4079 Grants and cooperative agreements; availability, etc.:
HOPE VI Main Street Program; correction, 44110-44116 05-15171 Industry Industry and Security Bureau NOTICES Export privileges, actions affecting: Weh Enterprises, et al., 44084-44085 05-15140 Interior Interior Department See Fish and Wildlife Service See Land Management Bureau IRS Internal Revenue Service NOTICES Agency information collection activities; proposals, submissions, and approvals, 44147-44148 E5-4075 International International Trade Administration NOTICES Agency information collection activities; proposals, submissions, and approvals, 44085 E5-4083 Antidumping:
Granular polytetrafluoroethylene from— Japan, 44088-44089 E5-4073 Mechanical transfer presses from— Japan, 44089 E5-4074 Antidumping and countervailing duties: Administrative review requests, 44085-44087 E5-4072 Five year (sunset) reviews— Initiation of reviews, 44087-44088 E5-4090 Justice Justice Department See Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives Bureau See Antitrust Division See Executive Office for Immigration Review Labor Labor Department See Occupational Safety and Health Administration Land Land Management Bureau NOTICES Survey plat filings:
Alaska, 44117 05-15117 05-15118 Library Library of Congress See Copyright Office, Library of Congress Management Management and Budget Office NOTICES Pay raise assumptions, inflation factors, and costing software used in OMB Circular A-76, Performance of Commercial Activities, 44130-44131 05-15155 National Mediation National Mediation Board NOTICES Agency information collection activities; proposals, submissions, and approvals, 44119-44121 05-15100 NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration RULES Fishery conservation and management:
Northeastern United States fisheries— Atlantic deep-sea red crab, 44066-44069 05-15142 West Coast States and Western Pacific fisheries— West Coast salmon, 44069-44073 05-15094 05-15095 05-15096 NOTICES Agency information collection activities; proposals, submissions, and approvals, 44089-44090 05-15110 Committees; establishment, renewal, termination, etc.: Marine Fisheries Advisory Committee, 44090 05-15141 Thunder Bay National Marine Sanctuary and Underwater Preserve Advisory Council, 44091-44092 05-15144 Meetings:
Science Advisory Board, 44218 05-15101 Permits: Exempted fishing, 44090-44091 E5-4080 Scientific research, 44091 05-15143 National Science National Science Foundation NOTICES Meetings; Sunshine Act, 44121-44122 05-15248 05-15249 Nuclear Nuclear Regulatory Commission NOTICES Reports and guidance documents; availability, etc.: Generic letters— Inaccessible or underground cable failures that disable accident mitigation systems, 44127-44130 05-15124 *Applications, hearings, determinations, etc.:* Entergy Operations, Inc., 44122-44123 05-15125 Envirocare of Utah, Inc., 44123-44127 05-15123 Occupational Occupational Safety and Health Administration PROPOSED RULES Safety and health standards:
Ionizing radiation; occupational exposure, 44074-44075 05-15119 Office Office of Management and Budget See Management and Budget Office Presidential Presidential Documents ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS Government agencies and employees: State Department; assignment of reporting functions to the Secretary (Memorandum of July 4, 2005), 44041 05-15232 Rural Rural Housing Service NOTICES Agency information collection activities; proposals, submissions, and approvals, 44083 05-15112 SEC Securities and Exchange Commission NOTICES Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 filings, 44131 E5-4089 Self-regulatory organizations; proposed rule changes:
Depository Trust Co., 44132-44133 E5-4078 National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., 44133-44136 E5-4087 E5-4088 Pacific Exchange, Inc., 44136-44138 E5-4082 Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc., 44138-44146 E5-4076 E5-4077 SBA Small Business Administration NOTICES Agency information collection activities; proposals, submissions, and approvals, 44146 05-15116 State State Department NOTICES Cultural property: Italy; pre-classical, classical, and imperial archaeological material;
U.S. import restrictions; memorandum of understanding, 44146 05-15153 Meetings: Cultural Property Advisory Committee, 44146-44147 05-15154 Thrift Thrift Supervision Office NOTICES Agency information collection activities; proposals, submissions, and approvals, 44148 05-15136 Transportation Transportation Department See Federal Aviation Administration NOTICES Certificates of public convenience and necessity and foreign air carrier permits; weekly applications, 44147 05-15126 Treasury Treasury Department See Internal Revenue Service See Thrift Supervision Office NOTICES Privacy Act:
Systems of records, 44178-44197 05-14901 Veterans Veterans Affairs Department NOTICES Agency information collection activities; proposals, submissions, and approvals, 44148-44149 E5-4070 E5-4071 Separate Parts In This Issue Part II Environmental Protection Agency, 44154-44175 05-14930 Part III Treasury Department, 44178-44197 05-14901 Part IV Interior Department, Fish and Wildlife Service, 44200-44215 05-15127 Part V Commerce Department, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 44218 05-15101 Reader Aids Consult the Reader Aids section at the end of this issue for phone numbers, online resources, finding aids, reminders, and notice of recently enacted public laws.
To subscribe to the Federal Register Table of Contents LISTSERV electronic mailing list, go to http://listserv.access.gpo.gov and select Online mailing list archives, FEDREGTOC-L, Join or leave the list (or change settings); then follow the instructions. 70 146 Monday, August 1, 2005 Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Marketing Service 7 CFR Part 996 [Docket No. FV05-996-2 FR] Change in Minimum Quality and Handling Standards for Domestic and Imported Peanuts Marketed in the United States AGENCY:
Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: This rule changes the peanut quality and handling standards (Standards) to require that domestic and imported peanuts be dried to 18 percent moisture or less prior to inspection and to 10.49 percent or less prior to storing or milling. Virginia-type peanuts used for seed must be dried to 18 percent or less prior to inspection and to 11.49 percent or less prior to storing or milling. The Standards and the Peanut Standards Board (Board) were established by the Department of Agriculture (USDA), pursuant to section 1308 of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002.
The Board suggested changing the peanut quality and handling standards to allow handlers and importers to receive or acquire high moisture peanuts to promote the development of new drying technologies, increase efficiencies, and reduce costs to the industry. DATES: Effective August 2, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dawana J. Clark or Kenneth G. Johnson, DC Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA; Telephone
(301)734-5243, Fax:
(301)734-5275; or George J. Kelhart, Technical Advisor, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Stop 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone
(202)720-2491, Fax:
(202)720-8938; or E-mail: *dawana.clark@usda.gov* , *kenneth.johnson@usda.gov* or *george.kelhart@usda.gov* . Small businesses may request information on complying with this rule by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone:
(202)720-2491, Fax:
(202)720-8938, or E-mail: *jay.guerber@usda.gov* . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule is issued under section 1308 of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107-171), 7 U.S.C. 7958, hereinafter referred to as the “Farm Bill.” This final rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866 and has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget. This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect. This rule will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this rule. There are no administrative procedures which must be exhausted prior to any judicial challenge to the provisions of this rule. Background Section 1308 of the Farm Bill requires that USDA take several actions with regard to peanuts marketed in the United States. These include ensuring mandatory inspection on all peanuts marketed in the United States; establishing the Board comprised of producers and industry representatives to advise USDA; developing and implementing peanut quality and handling standards; and modifying those quality and handling standards when needed. An interim final rule was published in the **Federal Register** (67 FR 57129) on September 9, 2002, terminating the previous peanut programs and establishing standards in part 996 to insure the continued inspection of 2002 crop year peanuts and subsequent crop year peanuts, 2001 crop year peanuts not yet inspected, and 2001 crop year failing peanuts that had not yet met disposition standards. The initial Board was selected and announced on December 5, 2002. A final rule finalizing the interim final rule was published in the **Federal Register** (68 FR 1145) on January 9, 2003, to continue requiring all domestic and imported peanuts marketed in the United States to be handled consistent with the handling standards and officially inspected against the quality standards of the new program. The peanut quality and handling standards were later revised in rules published in the **Federal Register** (68 FR 46919, August 7, 2003, and 68 FR 53490, September 11, 2003). The provisions of this program continue in force and effect until modified, suspended, or terminated. Pursuant to the Farm Bill, USDA has consulted with Board members in its review of the handling and quality standards for the 2005 and subsequent crop years. The quality and handling standards are intended to assure that satisfactory quality and wholesome peanuts are used in the domestic and import peanut markets. All peanuts intended for human consumption must be officially inspected and graded by the Federal or Federal-State Inspection Service and, if necessary, undergo chemical testing by a USDA laboratory or a private laboratory approved by USDA. Under the Standards, § 996.30(b) *Moisture.* specifies “No handler or importer shall receive or acquire farmers stock peanuts for subsequent disposition to human consumption outlets containing more than 10.49 percent moisture: *Provided* , That peanuts of a higher moisture may be received and dried to not more than 10.49 percent moisture prior to storing or milling: And *Provided further* , That Virginia-type peanuts used for seed may be received or acquired containing up to 11.49 percent moisture.” High Moisture peanuts are farmers stock peanuts that have a moisture content, when harvested, in excess of 10.49 percent moisture. In order to ensure that high moisture peanuts are dried to or below 10.49 percent moisture, growers must dry the peanuts on individual wagons/trailers. Often farmers stock peanuts are dried, taken to a sheller or handler, inspected and found to still be too high in moisture content, and must then be returned for additional drying at the grower's farm, at a handler/buying point facility, or at another location. Not all buying points, especially those in very rural locations, have drying facilities. This results in inefficiencies and added costs. Handlers may receive high moisture peanuts, but cannot acquire them. Peanuts that are received cannot be mixed, commingled, or otherwise lose their identity. Accordingly, any high moisture deliveries from a producer cannot be mixed with other high moisture deliveries. However, the inability to commingle high moisture peanut deliveries for drying slows producer deliveries and raises drying costs. It also raises inspection costs because the peanuts need to be inspected a second time to verify moisture levels prior to handler acquisition. In response to requests from industry representatives and the Board, USDA allowed a trial relaxation in incoming peanut requirements for the 2004 crop year only. The Standards continued to require that farmers stock peanuts be dried to 10.49 percent moisture or less before storing or milling. However, wagonloads or lots of farmers stock peanuts grading between 10.50 and 18.00 percent moisture could be commingled at the handler/buying point facilities and bulk dried by handlers, in agreement with each producer of the wagonloads or lots being commingled. An 18 percent moisture limit recognizes the difficulties in the Inspection Service's use of its shelling equipment for peanuts with more than 18 percent moisture. After drying, a second inspection for moisture only was performed by Federal-State inspectors and documented accordingly. When the commingled lot was presented for the second “moisture only” inspection, the buying point was required to provide documentation identifying the specific lots or wagonloads which constituted the commingled lot. In the event that a commingled lot, after bulk drying, still did not meet the 10.49 percent moisture requirement, the lot could be further dried and re-inspected until the lot contained no more than 10.49 percent moisture. This temporary relaxation was the culmination of several meetings and requests from the Board and the peanut industry to bring the high moisture issue to conclusion. The Board made several recommendations regarding high moisture peanuts in 2003 and 2004. However, prior to the Board's discussion of any changes for 2005 crop peanuts, the USDA's Farm Service Agency
(FSA)identified an FSA program issue requiring resolution before implementation of any relaxation to the moisture standard. Under FSA's loan program (7 CFR part 1421), high moisture peanuts must be segregated by each producer and dried to a moisture content not exceeding 10.49 percent. If high moisture peanuts from more than one producer are commingled and batch dried, the quality, quantity, and identity of each participating producer's peanuts would be lost. As such, those high moisture peanuts would not be eligible for FSA marketing assistance loans
(MAL)or loan deficiency payments (LDP). These concerns have been resolved through a formulation of a revised FSA Form 1007 (a combined inspection certificate and calculation worksheet) that identifies and tracks high moisture peanut shipments. Inspection procedures and reporting requirements will remain unchanged. The original peanut inspection notesheet/certificate will accompany the FSA Form 1007 with the converted high moisture factors from the high moisture conversion charts provided by the National Peanut Research Laboratory (NPRL). The NPRL conversion charts provide a guide for varying levels of high moisture peanuts received and the converted grade factor equivalents when dried down to an acceptable level without having to conduct another inspection on the dried down peanuts. The Board met on March 16, 2005, and unanimously recommended that § 996.30(b) be modified so that handlers and importers may receive or acquire farmers stock peanuts for subsequent disposition to human consumption outlets containing more than 18 percent moisture: *Provided* , That farmers stock peanuts be dried to not more than 18 percent moisture prior to inspection and grading. If the sound mature kernel and sound splits grade is 60 or below on a lot of peanuts that contains moisture between 10.49 and 18 percent, the lot of peanuts shall be dried to a moisture level of 10.49 or below prior to inspection and grading. Valencia peanuts may only be inspected at moisture levels 10.49 and below. All farmers stock peanuts must be dried to not more than 10.49 percent moisture prior to storing or milling: *Provided* , That Virginia-type peanuts used for seed must be dried to 18 percent or less prior to inspection and to 11.49 percent or less prior to storing or milling. On March 23, 2005, the Board's implementation sub-committee recommended the removal from the Board's recommendation of the moisture requirement on peanuts with a sound mature kernel plus sound splits grade of 60 or below because this requirement was not needed. According to a number of Board members, allowing handlers and importers to receive high moisture peanuts will make a significant difference in the efficient acquisition and warehousing of farmers' stock peanuts each fall. Allowing the acquisition of high moisture peanuts will allow handlers to accumulate a number of loads and batch dry them at the same time. These Board members indicated that this will speed up drying, grading, and movement of peanuts at harvest, which will be especially important when adverse weather conditions during harvest could cause peanut quality to deteriorate. According to some Board members, it will also reduce drying and inspection costs. Therefore under this final rule, domestic and imported peanuts must be dried to 18 percent or less prior to inspection and 10.49 percent or less prior to storing or milling. Virginia-type peanuts used for seed must be dried to 18 percent or less prior to inspection and to 11.49 percent or less prior to storing or milling. Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Act
(RFA)the Agricultural Marketing Service
(AMS)has considered the economic impact of this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS had prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis. The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. There are approximately 55 peanut shelling entities, operating approximately 70 shelling plants, and 25 importers subject to regulation under the peanut program. An estimated two-thirds of the handlers and nearly all of the importers may be classified as small entities, based on documents and reports received by USDA. Small agricultural service firms, which include handlers and importers, are defined by the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.201), as those having annual receipts of less than $6,000,000. An approximation of the number of peanut farms that could be considered small agricultural businesses under the SBA definition (less than $750,000 in annual receipts) can be obtained from the 2002 Agricultural Census, which is the most recent information on the number of farms categorized by size. There were 7,551 peanut farms with annual agricultural sales valued at less than $500,000 in 2002, representing 87 percent of the total number of peanut farms in the U.S. (8,640). Since the Agricultural Census does not use $750,000 in sales as a category, $500,000 in sales is the closest approximation. Assuming that most of the sales from those farms are attributable to peanuts, the percentage of small peanut farms in 2002 (less than $750,000 in sales) was likely a few percentage points higher than 87 percent, and may have shifted by a small amount since 2002. Thus, the proportion of small peanut farms is likely to be close to 90 percent. According to the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), the two-year average peanut production for the 2003 and 2004 crop years was 4.203 billion pounds, harvested from average acreage of 1.353 million, yielding an average of 3,106 pounds per acre. The average value of production for the two-year period was $816.904 million. The average grower price over the two-year period was $0.194 per pound, and the average value per harvested acre was $604. Dividing the two year average value of production ($816.904 million) by the estimated 8,640 peanut farms (2002 Agricultural Census) yields an estimated average peanut sales revenue per farm of approximately $94,440. Average peanut acreage per farm is 156. The Agricultural Census provides data on the value of annual sales of all agricultural products from peanut farms in terms of ranges. The value of annual agricultural product sales of the median peanut farm in 2002 was between $50,000 and $99,999. The median is the midpoint ranging from the largest to the smallest. Several producers may own a single farm jointly, or, conversely, a producer may own several farms. In the peanut industry, there is, on average, more than one producer per farm. Dividing the two year average value of production of $816.904 million by 14,186 peanut producers (Farm Service Agency 2004 estimate) results in an estimate of average revenue per producer of approximately $57,585. The current 14 custom blanchers, 8 custom remillers, 4 oil mill operators, 4 USDA and 15 USDA-approved private chemical (aflatoxin) laboratories are subject to this rule to the extent that they must comply with reconditioning provisions under § 996.50 and reporting and recordkeeping requirements under § 996.71. These requirements are applied uniformly to these entities, whether large or small. In addition, there are currently 10 State inspection programs (Inspection Service) that will perform inspections under this peanut program. Importers of peanuts cover a broad range of business entities, including fresh and processed food handlers and commodity brokers who buy agricultural products on behalf of others. Some large, corporate handlers are also importers of peanuts. AMS is not aware of any peanut producers who imported peanuts during any of the recent quota years. The majority of peanut importers have annual receipts under $6,000,000. Some importers use customs brokers' import services. These brokers are usually held accountable by the importer to see that entry requirements under § 996.60 and reporting and recordkeeping requirements under § 996.71 are met. These reporting requirements are not applied disproportionately to small customs brokers. In view of the foregoing, it can be concluded that the majority of peanut producers, handlers, importers, and above-mentioned entities may be classified as small businesses. This final rule changes the minimum peanut quality and handling standards so that handlers may receive peanuts with a moisture content of up to 18 percent. The Board suggested changing the minimum peanut quality and handling standards to allow handlers to receive high moisture peanuts to promote the development of new drying technologies, increase efficiencies and reduce costs to the industry. USDA has considered alternatives to the suggested change to the quality and handling standards. The Farm Bill requires USDA to consult with the Board on these standards. An alternative would be to continue the current standards for the 2005 crop year. The current Board's recommended change to the handling and quality standards was raised during last year's USDA/Board standards review but was tabled until an inter-agency collaboration (AMS and FSA) could coordinate their respective peanut handling and loan regulations. However, because of the anticipated benefits of the recommended change, USDA believes the implementation of the Board's suggested change is preferable to continuing without change. The Board's meeting was open to a wide audience and all interested persons were invited to attend the meeting and provide input. USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this rule. A small business guide on complying with AMS fresh fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop programs similar to this peanut program may be viewed at the following Web site: *http://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.* Any questions about the compliance guide or compliance with this program should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Information Collection The Farm Bill specifies in section 1601(c)(2)(A) that the standards established pursuant to it, may be implemented without regard to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). Furthermore, this rule does not change the existing information collection burden. Section 1601 of the Farm Bill also provides that promulgation of or amendments to the standards may be implemented without extending interested parties an opportunity to comment. However, due to the nature of the proposed changes, interested parties were provided 15 days to file comments. The proposed rule concerning these changes was published in the **Federal Register** (70 FR 35562) on June 21, 2005. The rule was posted on the AMS Web site specified above and was available through the internet by the Office of the Federal Register. The proposed rule provided that comments received by July 6, 2005, would be considered in finalizing the rulemaking action. A total of four comments were received from a peanut shellers association, a peanut product manufacturers association, a peanut growers association, and the Georgia Peanut Commission. Three comments were in support of the proposed rule. The comment from the peanut commission stated that it wanted to be certain that grower interests were protected and that any proposed changes would not be detrimental to growers. This rule would allow handlers and importers to receive or acquire high moisture peanuts thereby promoting the development of new drying technologies, increasing efficiencies and reducing costs to the overall industry. This comment also mentioned an additional concern pertaining to comparable loan calculations on peanuts that have been dried to a suitable loan level. As stated previously in this action, FSA has revised its Form 1007 to identify and track high moisture peanut shipments, including green peanuts. Accordingly, no changes are made in the provisions as proposed. It also is found that good cause exists for not postponing the effective date of this rule until 30 days after publication in the **Federal Register** (5 U.S.C. 553) because producers and handlers are preparing for the 2005 crop year, which starts September 1. Further, handlers are aware of this rule, which was recommended at a public meeting. Also, a 15-day comment period was provided for in the proposed rule and four comments were received as discussed herein. List of Subjects 7 CFR Part 996 Food grades and standards, Imports, Peanuts, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 996 is amended as follows: PART 996—MINIMUM QUALITY AND HANDLING STANDARDS FOR DOMESTIC AND IMPORTED PEANUTS MARKETED IN THE UNITED STATES 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 996 continues to read as follows: Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7958. 2. Paragraph
(b)of § 996.30 is revised to read as follows: § 996.30 Incoming quality standards.
(a)* * *
(b)*Moisture.* Domestic and imported peanuts shall be dried to 18 percent or less prior to inspection and to 10.49 percent or less prior to storing or milling: *Provided,* That Virginia-type peanuts used for seed shall be dried to 18 percent or less prior to inspection and to 11.49 percent or less prior to storing or milling. Dated: July 27, 2005. Kenneth C. Clayton, Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service. [FR Doc. 05-15167 Filed 7-27-05; 4:10 pm]
Connectionstraces to 5
3 references not yet in our index
  • 7 CFR 996
  • Pub. L. 107-171
  • 7 CFR 1421
Citation graph
cites case law
Unknown
Final rule
Cite7 CFR 996
Pub. L.Pub. L. 107-171
Cite7 CFR 1421
Cites 8Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.