Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2005-07-27 · DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL AERONAUTICS · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Interim rule with request for comments

951 words·~4 min read·/register/2005/07/27/05-14666·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 6820-EP-S DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION 48 CFR Part 2 [FAC 2005-05; FAR Case 2004-030; Item I] RIN 9000-AK21 Federal Acquisition Regulation; Definition of Information Technology AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). ACTION: Interim rule with request for comments. SUMMARY: The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense Acquisition Regulations Council (Councils) have agreed on an interim rule amending the Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR)to revise the definition of “information technology” to reflect the changes to the definition resulting from the enactment of Public Law 108-199, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2004. The new language at Section 535(b) of Division F of Public Law 108-199 permanently revises the term “information technology,” which is defined at 40 U.S.C. 11101(6), to add “analysis” and “evaluation” and to clarify the term “ancillary equipment.” DATES: *Effective Date:* July 27, 2005. *Comment Date* : Interested parties should submit comments to the FAR Secretariat at the address shown below on or before September 26, 2005 to be considered in the formulation of a final rule. ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by FAC 2005-05, FAR case 2004-030, by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: *http://www.regulations.gov* . Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Agency Web Site: *http://www.acqnet.gov/far/ProposedRules/proposed.htm* . Click on the FAR case number to submit comments. • E-mail: farcase.2004-030@gsa.gov. Include FAC 2005-05, FAR case 2004-030, in the subject line of the message. • Fax: 202-501-4067. • Mail: General Services Administration, Regulatory Secretariat (VIR), 1800 F Street, NW, Room 4035, ATTN: Laurieann Duarte, Washington, DC 20405. *Instructions* : Please submit comments only and cite FAC 2005-05, FAR case 2004-030, in all correspondence related to this case. All comments received will be posted without change to *http://www.acqnet.gov/far/ProposedRules/proposed.htm* , including any personal information provided. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The FAR Secretariat at
(202)501-4755, for information pertaining to status or publication schedules. For clarification of content, contact Ms. Cecelia L. Davis, Procurement Analyst, at
(202)219-0202, or Mr. Bill Sain, Procurement Analyst, at
(703)602-0293. Please cite FAC 2005-05, FAR case 2004-030. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A. Background This interim rule implements the changes to the FAR definition of “information technology” resulting from the enactment of Section 535(b), Division F, of Public Law 108-199, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2004. The public law was effective January 23, 2004. The rule modifies the definition of “information technology” at FAR 2.101(b) to include “analysis” and “evaluation.” The rule also modifies the term “information technology” to include peripheral equipment designed to be controlled by the central processing unit of a computer, and clarifies the term “ancillary equipment” to include imaging peripherals, input, output, and storage devices necessary for security and surveillance. This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not subject to review under Section 6(b) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804. B. Regulatory Flexibility Act The interim rule is not expected to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act,5 U.S.C. 601, *et seq.* , because the interim rule revises the definition of information technology resulting from the enactment of Public Law 108-199, Consolidated Appropriation Act 2004. This is a minor technical change to the definition. Therefore, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has not been performed. However, the Councils will consider comments from small entities concerning the affected FAR Part 2 in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such comments separately and should cite 5 U.S.C 601, *et seq.* (FAC 2005-05, FAR case 2004-030), in correspondence. C. Paperwork Reduction Act The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the changes to the FAR do not impose information collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501, *et seq.* D. Determination to Issue an Interim Rule A determination has been made under the authority of the Secretary of Defense (DoD), the Administrator of General Services (GSA), and the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
(NASA)that urgent and compelling reasons exist to promulgate this interim rule without prior opportunity for public comment. This action is necessary to implement the changes resulting from the enactment of Section 535(b), Division F, of Public Law 108-199, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2004, that were effective January 23, 2004. However, pursuant to Public Law 98-577 and FAR 1.501, the Councils will consider public comments received in response to this interim rule in the formation of the final rule. List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 2 Government procurement. Dated: July 20, 2005. Julia B. Wise, Director, Contract Policy Division. Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA amend 48 CFR part 2 as set forth below: PART 2—DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 2 is revised to read as follows: Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 42 U.S.C. 2473(c). 2. In section 2.101, amend paragraph (b), in the definition “Information technology,” by adding the words “analysis, evaluation,” after the word “storage,” revising paragraph
(2)of the definition; and in paragraph (3)(ii), adding “analysis, evaluation,” after the word “storage,”. The revised text reads as follows: 2.101 Definitions.
(b)* * * *Information technology* * * *
(1)* * *
(2)The term “information technology” includes computers, ancillary equipment (including imaging peripherals, input, output, and storage devices necessary for security and surveillance), peripheral equipment designed to be controlled by the central processing unit of a computer, software, firmware and similar procedures, services (including support services), and related resources. [FR Doc. 05-14666 Filed 7-26-05; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 7
4 references not yet in our index
  • 48 CFR 2
  • Pub. L. 108-199
  • Pub. L. 98-577
  • 42 USC 2473(c)
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Interim rule with request for comments
Cite48 CFR 2
Pub. L.Pub. L. 108-199
Pub. L.Pub. L. 98-577
Cite42 USC 2473(c)
Cites 11Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.