Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2005-06-08 · Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce · Notices

Notices. Notice

1,026 words·~5 min read·/register/2005/06/08/05-11338

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 6820-YM-P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-588-824] Certain Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products From Japan: Notice of Extension of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. EFFECTIVE DATE: June 8, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Hargett or James Terpstra, AD/CVD Operations, Office 3, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202)482-4161 or
(202)482-3965. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The Department of Commerce (“the Department”) published an antidumping duty order on certain corrosion-resistant carbon steel flat products from Japan on August 19, 1993. *See Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products from Japan* , 58 FR 44163 (August 19, 1993). Nucor Corporation (“Nucor”), a domestic interested party, requested that the Department conduct an administrative review of the order. *See Letter from Nucor Corporation* , August 31, 2004. On September 22, 2004, the Department published a notice of initiation of administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain corrosion-resistant carbon steel flat products from Japan, covering the period of August 1, 2003, to July 31, 2004. *See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation, In Part* , 69 FR 56745. On May 3, 2005, the Department extended the time for issuing the preliminary results until June 2, 2005. *See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products from Japan: Notice of Extension of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review* , 70 FR 24393 (May 9, 2005). On May 20, 2005, Nucor filed a letter withdrawing its request for administrative review. In its letter, Nucor requested that the Department rescind the review. *See Letter from Nucor Corporation re; Corrosion Resistant Steel Flat Products from Japan* . On June 2, 2005, United States Steel (“U.S. Steel”), a domestic interested party, filed comments objecting to the Department rescinding the review. *See Letter from U.S. Steel* . The preliminary results for this review are currently due no later than June 2, 2005. Extension of Time Limits for Preliminary Results Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (“the Act”), requires the Department to issue the preliminary results of an administrative review within 245 days after the last day of the anniversary month of an order for which a review is requested. If it is not practicable to complete the review within the time period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and section 351.213(h)(2) of the Department's regulations allow the Department to extend this deadline to a maximum of 365 days. The Department received comments objecting to the rescission of the review on the deadline date for issuing the preliminary results. The Department requires time to evaluate the objection to rescinding the review. Therefore, the Department determines that it is not practicable to complete the review by June 2, 2005, and is extending the time limit for completion of the preliminary results by 28 days to no later than June 30, 2005. In the event the Department decides to proceed with this administrative review, we expect to issue the final results no later than 120 days after publication of the notice of the preliminary results. This notice is being issued and published in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Dated: June 2, 2005. Barbara E. Tillman, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E5-2931 Filed 6-7-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Coastal Zone Management Program Administration AGENCY: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), DOC. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before August 8, 2005. ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at *dHynek@doc.gov* ). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or copies of the information collection instrument and instructions should be directed to Masi Okasaki, 301-713-3155, extension 180 or e-mail at *masi.okasaki@noaa.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Abstract The coastal zone management grants provide funds to state and territories to: implement federally approved coastal management plans; revise assessment and multi-year strategy documents; submit Section 306A documentation; submit requests to approve program changes and amendments; complete performance reports; complete National Coastal Management Performance Measurement System documentation, and complete the states coastal nonpoint source pollution program. II. Method of Collection Both electronic and paper submissions are accepted from respondents. A comprehensive web-based application information system is under development. III. Data *OMB Number:* 0648-0119. *Form Number:* None. *Type of Review:* Regular submission. *Affected Public:* State, Local or Tribal government. *Estimated Number of Respondents:* 35. *Estimated Time Per Response:* Performance Reports, 27 hours; Assessment and Strategy, 240 hours; 306A Documentation, 5 hours; Amendments and Program Changes, 8 hours; National Coastal Management Performance Measurement System, 380 hours; and Coastal Nonpoint Pollution Program, 70 hours. *Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:* 17,974. *Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public:* $500. IV. Request for Comments *Comments are invited on:*
(a)Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility;
(b)the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden (including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information;
(c)ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(d)ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information collection; they also will become a matter of public record. Dated: June 2, 2005. Gwellnar Banks, Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 05-11338 Filed 6-7-05; 8:45 am]
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.