Notices. Notice

4,273 words·~19 min read·/register/2005/05/03/05-8728

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS [OMB Control No. 2900-New (Pay Now Enter Info Page)] Agency Information Collection Activities Under OMB Review AGENCY: Office of Management, Department of Veterans Affairs. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act

(PRA)of 1995 (44 U.S.C., 3501 *et seq.* ), this notice announces that the Office of Management (OM), Department of Veterans Affairs, has submitted the collection of information abstracted below to the Office of Management and Budget

(OMB)for review and comment. The PRA submission describes the nature of the information collection and its expected cost and burden; it includes the actual data collection instrument. DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before June 2, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR A COPY OF THE SUBMISSION CONTACT: Denise McLamb, Records Management Service (005E3), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420,

(202)273-8030, FAX

(202)273-5981 or e-mail: *denise.mclamb@mail.va.gov.* Please refer to “OMB Control No. 2900-New (Pay Now Enter Info Page).” Send comments and recommendations concerning any aspect of the information collection to VA's OMB Desk Officer, OMB Human Resources and Housing Branch, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503

(202)395-7316. Please refer to “OMB Control No. 2900- New (Pay Now Enter Info Page)” in any correspondence. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: *Title:* Pay Now Enter Info Page. *OMB Control Number:* 2900-New (Pay Now Enter Info Page). *Type of Review:* New collection. *Abstract:* VA is participating in a program of online debt collections in cooperation with the Department of the Treasury's Pay.gov initiative. Claimants who participated in VA's benefit programs and owe debts to VA can voluntary make online payments through VA's Pay Now Enter Info Page Web site. Data enter on the Pay Now Enter Info Page is redirected to the Department of Treasury's Pay.gov Web site allowing claimants to make payments with credit or debit cards, or directly from their bank account. At the conclusion of the transaction, the claimant will receive a confirmation acknowledging the success or failure of the transaction. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The **Federal Register** Notice with a 60-day comment period soliciting comments on this collection of information was published on January 19, 2005, at page 3104. *Affected Public:* Individuals or households. *Estimated Annual Burden:* 1,167 hours. *Estimated Average Burden Per Respondent:* 15 minutes. *Frequency of Response:* Daily. *Estimated Number of Respondents:* 7,000. Dated: April 25, 2005. By direction of the Secretary: Loise Russell, Director, Records Management Service. [FR Doc. E5-2139 Filed 5-2-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8320-01-P DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS [OMB Control No. 2900-0031] Proposed Information Collection Activity: Proposed Collection; Comment Request AGENCY: Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA), Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), is announcing an opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain information by the agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act

(PRA)of 1995, Federal agencies are required to publish notice in the **Federal Register** concerning each proposed collection of information, including each proposed extension of a currently approved collection, and allow 60 days for public comment in response to this notice. This notice solicits comments on information needed to determine a claimant's eligibility for specially adapted housing grant. DATES: Written comments and recommendations on the proposed collection of information should be received on or before July 5, 2005. ADDRESSES: Submit written comments on the collection of information to Nancy J. Kessinger, Veterans Benefits Administration (20M35), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420 or e-mail: *irmnkess@vba.va.gov.* Please refer to “OMB Control No. 2900-0031” in any correspondence. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy J. Kessinger at

(202)273-7079 or FAX

(202)275-5947. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13; 44 U.S.C. 3501-3521), Federal agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget

(OMB)for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor. This request for comment is being made pursuant to Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA. With respect to the following collection of information, VBA invites comments on:

(1)Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of VBA's functions, including whether the information will have practical utility;

(2)the accuracy of VBA's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information;

(3)ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and

(4)ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or the use of other forms of information technology. *Title:* Veteran's Supplemental Application for Assistance in Acquiring Specially Adapted Housing, VA Form 26-4555c. *OMB Control Number:* 2900-0031. *Type of Review:* Extension of a currently approved collection. *Abstract:* Veterans complete VA Form 26-4555c to apply specially adapted housing grant. VA uses the data collected to determine if it is economically feasible for a veteran to reside in specially adapted housing and to determine the veteran's eligibility for such grant. *Affected Public:* Individuals or households. *Estimated Annual Burden:* 150 hours. *Estimated Average Burden Per Respondent:* 15 minutes. *Frequency of Response:* On occasion. *Estimated Number of Respondents:* 600. Dated: April 25, 2005. By direction of the Secretary: Loise Russell, Director, Records Management Service. [FR Doc. E5-2140 Filed 5-2-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8320-01-P DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Enhanced-Use Lease of VA Property, Chicago (Lakeside), IL AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs. ACTION: Notice of intent to dispose of property to an enhanced-use lessee. SUMMARY: The Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs

(VA)intends to dispose of approximately 3.8 acres of VA property (known as “Lakeside”) in Chicago, Illinois. The Department, in accordance with 38 U.S.C. 8164, proposes to transfer all right, title, and interest of the United States in the property to Northwestern Memorial Hospital, which is currently leasing the property from VA for 75 years. VA would use the disposal proceeds to improve and expand health care services and facilities for veterans. Under other terms of the proposed disposal, VA could continue using a portion of the Lakeside property to provide outpatient care services to veterans until January 18, 2008. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian A. McDaniel, Office of Asset Enterprise Management (004B), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420,

(202)273-9492. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 38 U.S.C. 8164 specifically provides that the Secretary may dispose of enhanced-use leased property if he determines that the leased property is no longer needed by the Department, and that disposal under that section, rather than under 38 U.S.C. 8122, is in the best interests of the Department. Approved: April 27, 2005. R. James Nicholson, Secretary of Veterans Affairs. [FR Doc. E5-2138 Filed 5-2-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8320-01-P 70 84 Tuesday, May, 3, 2005 Corrections !!!Lois Davis!!! SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-51540; File No. SR-CBOE-2005-21] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Relating to the Calculation of the National Best Bid or Offer When Another Exchange is Disconnected From the Intermarket Options Linkage Correction In notice document E5-1878 beginning on page 20780 in the issue of Thursday, April 21, 2005, make the following correction: On page 20781, in the second column, under the heading *Paper Comments* , in the second paragraph, in the last line, “May 21, 2005” should read “May 12, 2005”. [FR Doc. Z5-1878 Filed 5-2-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 1505-01-D 70 84 Tuesday, May 3, 2005 Rules and Regulations Part II Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Parts 71 and 97 Revision of Incorporation by Reference Provisions; Final Rule DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Parts 71 and 97 [Docket No. FAA-2004-19247; Amdt. Nos. 71-33, 97-1335] RIN 2120-AI39 Revision of Incorporation by Reference Provisions AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: This final rule removes the incorporation by reference of certain FAA orders and terminal aeronautical charts from the Code of Federal Regulations. The previous IBR of these materials inappropriately designated them as regulatory. Instead, the FAA is incorporating by reference the instrument procedures and weather takeoff minimums that are documented on FAA forms. This change ensures that the appropriate material is incorporated by reference into the FAA's regulations. DATES: This rule is effective June 2, 2005. The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the rule is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of June 2, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas E. Schneider, AFS-420, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125; telephone

(405)954-5852; facsimile

(405)954-2528; e-mail *thomas.e.schneider@faa.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Availability of Rulemaking Documents You can get an electronic copy using the Internet by:

(1)Searching the Department of Transportation's electronic Docket Management System

(DMS)Web page ( *http://dms.dot.gov/search* );

(2)Visiting the Office of Rulemaking's Web page at *http://www.faa.gov/avr/arm/index.cfm;* or

(3)Accessing the Government Printing Office's Web page at *http://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/index.html.* You can also get a copy by submitting a request to the Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Rulemaking, ARM-1, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591, or by calling

(202)267-9680. Be sure to identify the docket number, notice number, or amendment number of this rulemaking. Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act statement in the **Federal Register** published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-19478) or you may visit *http://dms.dot.gov.* Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) of 1996 requires the FAA to comply with small entity requests for information or advice about compliance with statutes and regulations within its jurisdiction. If you are a small entity and you have a question regarding this document, you may contact your local FAA official, or the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT . You can find out more about SBREFA on the Internet at *http://www.faa.gov/avr/arm/sbrefa/cfm.* Statutory Authority for This Rulemaking The FAA's authority to issue this final rule is derived, in part, from 49 U.S.C. 40103, which requires the FAA to prescribe air traffic regulations on the flight of aircraft for navigating, protecting, and identifying aircraft; protecting individuals and property on the ground; using the navigable airspace efficiently; and preventing the collision of aircraft. Furthermore, under 49 U.S.C. 44701(a), the FAA promotes safe flight by prescribing regulations and minimum standards for other practices, methods, and procedures necessary for safety in air commerce. Background On April 8, 2003, the FAA adopted the final rule titled “Designation of Class A, B, C, D, and E Airspace Areas; Air Traffic Service Routes; and Reporting Points'' (68 FR 16943; April 8, 2003), which incorporated by reference into 14 CFR 97.20 FAA Orders 8260.3B and 8260.19C, and the terminal aeronautical charts. Upon staff review, the FAA concluded the incorporation by reference

(IBR)of these orders and terminal aeronautical charts was in error and resulted in the inappropriate designation of certain material as regulatory. The two orders originally incorporated by reference set forth the criteria used by the FAA to develop instrument approach procedures

(IAPs)and instrument flight rules

(IFR)takeoff minimums. The components that must be regulatory are the actual procedures and the takeoff minimums, not the developing criteria. Thus, only IAPs and takeoff minimums, which are delineated on FAA Forms, should be incorporated by reference. Similarly, it is not appropriate to incorporate by reference terminal aeronautical charts, as these charts merely depict IAPs and takeoff minimums. On October 5, 2004, therefore, the FAA published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

(NPRM)(69 FR 59755, Oct. 5, 2004) proposing to correct the IBR of the material referenced above. The FAA proposed to incorporate by reference the standard instrument procedures documented on FAA Forms 8260-3, 8260-4, 8260-5 and the takeoff minimums on 8260-15A. Discussion of Comments Three entities commented on this rule: Airbus, the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association

(AOPA)and the Air Line Pilots Association, International (ALPA). All commenters generally supported the proposal. AOPA commented that the FAA should support Localizer Performance with Vertical Guidance

(LPV)approaches for IFR access to general aviation airports. AOPA also commented that while the incorporation by reference of departure procedures on FAA Form 8260-15A may establish obstacle departure procedures on every departure conducted under IFR, the FAA should not require pilots to follow these procedures on every flight. AOPA argues that air traffic control

(ATC)may require pilots to deviate from the procedures, which would cause a conflict with the departure procedures. Moreover, AOPA objects to the use of forms to impose new operational requirements upon the general aviation community without a specific operating requirement in 14 CFR part 91. Airbus also seeks clarification of the purpose for incorporating FAA Form 8260-15A. LPV procedures are not part of this rulemaking and this comment is outside the scope of this rulemaking. Form 8260-15A provides weather takeoff minimums and textual departure procedures. At the outset, we regret that the NPRM did not identify specifically that only the weather takeoff minimums articulated on form 8260-15A were proposed for incorporation. Consequently, this may have resulted in confusion as to whether associated departure procedures were also proposed for incorporation. This amendment distinguishes that the instrument approach procedures on FAA forms 8260-3, -4, and -5 and the weather takeoff minimums articulated on FAA form 8260-15A are IBR. Editorial changes reflecting the above clarification are in the regulatory text. With respect to the IBR of FAA form 8260-15A, we believe that AOPA misunderstands the applicability of this form and the relevant part 91 regulation. This amendment does not add any operational requirements for part 91 operators. Under current 14 CFR 91.175(f), in pertinent part, “Unless otherwise authorized by the Administrator, no pilot operating an aircraft under parts 121, 125, 129, or 135 of this chapter may take off from a civil airport under IFR unless weather conditions are at or above the weather minimums for IFR takeoff prescribed for that airport under part 97 of this chapter. If takeoff minimums are not prescribed under part 97 of this chapter for a particular airport, the following minimums apply to takeoffs under IFR for aircraft operating under those parts * * *.” This section does not apply to operations conducted under part 91. It currently requires operators (conducting operations under part 121, 125, 129, or 135) to comply with the weather takeoff minimums prescribed in part 97 for specified airports, and in the alternative if no weather takeoff minimums are specified in part 97, then § 91.175(f) specifies the required weather takeoff minimums. This rule provides the vehicle to incorporate by reference the weather takeoff minimums delineated on FAA form 8260-15A for designated airports in part 97. The operational requirement to comply with the takeoff minimums codified in part 97 already exists. Unless the aircraft operator obtains an authorization in accordance with § 91.175(f) to conduct its operations using weather takeoff minimums different from those specified in part 97, the takeoff minimums in part 97 must be met. This amendment does not add any new operational requirements for part 91 operators. ALPA supports the proposal and specifically requests that special instrument approach procedures described on FAA form 8260-7 also be incorporated by reference into part 97 so that industry and the flying public have the same opportunity to comment and participate in the development of these procedures. Special instrument procedures are designed to meet the unique needs of particular operators and are approved by the FAA for limited use. Often, specific equipment and training are required to use these procedures. These procedures are authorized to specific users and are not available for general use by the flying public. Comments addressing the administrative process followed to authorize special procedures is outside the scope of this rulemaking. The FAA is adopting the amendments as proposed with the clarification that only the weather takeoff minimums listed on form 8260-15A are incorporated by reference. Furthermore, the Office of the Federal Register has changed the location at which materials that are incorporated by reference may be examined. The materials are no longer available for examination at the Office of the Federal Register. Instead, the materials are now available for examination at the National Archives and Records Administration. Section 97.20(b) is updated accordingly. Paperwork Reduction Act The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) requires that the FAA consider the impact of paperwork and other information collection burdens imposed on the public. The FAA has determined that there is no new information collection requirement associated with this final rule. International Compatibility In keeping with U.S. obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation, it is FAA policy to comply with International Civil Aviation Organization

(ICAO)Standards and Recommended Practices to the maximum extent practicable. The FAA has determined that there are no ICAO Standards and Recommended Practices that correspond to these proposed regulations. Economic Assessment Changes to Federal regulations must undergo several economic analyses. First, Executive Order 12866 directs each Federal agency to propose or adopt a regulation only upon a reasoned determination the benefits of the intended regulation justify its costs. Second, the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 requires agencies to analyze the economic impact of regulatory changes on small entities. Third, the Trade Agreements Act (19 U.S.C. 2531-2533) prohibits agencies from setting standards that create unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of the United States. In developing U.S. standards, this Trade Act also requires agencies to consider international standards and, where appropriate, use them as the basis of U.S. standards. Fourth, the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4) requires agencies to prepare a written assessment of the costs, benefits, and other effects of proposed or final rules that include a Federal mandate likely to result in the expenditure by State, local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by private sector, of $100 million or more annually (adjusted for inflation). For regulations with an expected minimal impact the above-specified analyses are not required. The Department of Transportation's Order DOT 2100.5, which prescribes policies and procedures for simplification, analysis, and review of regulations, states that if it is determined that the expected impact is so minimal that the action does not warrant a full evaluation, a statement to that effect and the basis for it is included in the regulation. Since this final rule is administrative in nature removing inappropriate incorporation by reference of material from FAA regulations and adding appropriate incorporation by reference material, these changes will not impact the integrity of existing rules. As a result, this final rule will have a minimal economic impact. The FAA has determined that this rule—(1) has benefits that justify its costs, is not a “significant regulatory action” as defined in section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, and is not “significant” as defined in DOT's Regulatory Policies and Procedures;

(2)will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities;

(3)will not have any effect on barriers to international trade; and

(4)does not impose an unfunded mandate on state, local, or tribal governments, or on the private sector. Regulatory Flexibility Determination The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980

(RFA)establishes “as a principle of regulatory issuance that agencies shall endeavor, consistent with the objective of the rule and of applicable statutes, to fit regulatory and informational requirements to the scale of the business, organizations, and governmental jurisdictions subject to regulation.” To achieve that principle, the RFA requires agencies to solicit and consider flexible regulatory proposals and explain the rationale for their actions. The RFA covers a wide-range of small entities, including small businesses, not-for-profit organizations and small governmental jurisdictions. Agencies must perform a review to determine whether a proposed or final rule will have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. If the agency determines that it will, the agency must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis as described in the RFA. However, if an agency determines that a proposed or final rule is not expected to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities, section 605(b) of the RFA provides that the head of the agency may so certify and a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required. The certification must include a statement providing the factual basis for this determination, and the reasoning should be clear. This final rule is administrative in nature correcting an earlier action that resulted in an inappropriate designation of certain material as regulatory. Consequently, the FAA certifies the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Trade Impact Assessment The Trade Agreement Act of 1979 prohibits Federal agencies from establishing any standards or engaging in related activities that create unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of the United States. Legitimate domestic objectives, such as safety, are not considered unnecessary obstacles. The statute also requires consideration of international standards and, where appropriate, that they be the basis for U.S. standards. The FAA has assessed the potential effect of this rulemaking and has determined that it will impose no economic impact on domestic and international entities. Unfunded Mandates Assessment The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (the Act) is intended, among other things to curb the practice of imposing unfunded Federal mandates on State, local, and tribal governments. Title II of the Act requires each Federal agency to prepare a written statement assessing the effects of any Federal mandate in a proposed or final agency rule that may result in an expenditure of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for inflation) in any one year by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector; such a mandate is deemed to be a “significant regulatory action.” The FAA currently uses an inflation-adjusted value of $120.7 million in lieu of $100 million. This rule does not contain such a mandate. The requirements of Title II of the Act, therefore, do not apply. Executive Order 13132, Federalism The FAA has analyzed this final rule under the principles and criteria of Executive Order 13132, Federalism. The FAA has determined that this action would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, and therefore would not have federalism implications. Environmental Analysis FAA Order 1050.1E identifies FAA actions that are categorically excluded from preparation of an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement under the National Environmental Policy Act in the absence of extraordinary circumstances. The FAA has determined that this rulemaking action qualifies for the categorical exclusion identified in paragraph 312(f) and involves no extraordinary circumstances. Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use The FAA has analyzed this final rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations that Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (May 18, 2001). The FAA has determined that it is not a significant energy action under the executive order because it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866, and it is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. List of Subjects 14 CFR Part 71 Airspace, Navigation (air). 14 CFR Part 97 Air traffic control, Airports, Navigation (air), Incorporation by reference, Weather. The Amendments In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration amends chapter I of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows: PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS 1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR 1959-1963 Comp., p 389. § 71.11 [Amended] 2. Amend § 71.11 by removing paragraph

(b)and redesignating paragraph

(c)as paragraph (b). PART 97—STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES 3. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113, 40114, 40120, 44502, 44514, 44701, 44719, and 44721-44722. 4. Revise § 97.20 to read as follows: § 97.20 General.

(a)This subpart prescribes standard instrument procedures and weather takeoff minimums based on the criteria contained in FAA Order 8260.3, U.S. Standard for Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPs), and other related Orders in the 8260 series that also address instrument procedure design criteria.

(b)Standard instrument procedures and associated supporting data adopted by the FAA are documented on FAA Forms 8260-3, 8260-4, 8260-5. Weather takeoff minimums are documented on FAA Form 8260-15A. These forms are incorporated by reference. The Director of the Federal Register approved this incorporation by reference pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. The standard instrument procedures and weather takeoff minimums are available for examination at the FAA's Rules Docket (AGC-200) and at the National Flight Data Center, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20590, or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.*

(c)Standard instrument procedures and weather takeoff minimums are depicted on aeronautical charts published by the FAA National Aeronautical Charting Office. These charts are available for purchase from the FAA's National Aeronautical Charting Office, Distribution Division, 6303 Ivy Lane, Suite 400, Greenbelt, MD 20770. Issued in Washington, DC, on April 21, 2005. Marion C. Blakey, Administrator. [FR Doc. 05-8728 Filed 5-2-05; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 12

Traces to 12 documents

U.S. Code