Notices. Notice of Opportunity to Request Administrative Review of Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation

4,170 words·~19 min read·/register/2005/05/02/05-8642

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative Review AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. ACTION: Notice of Opportunity to Request Administrative Review of Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Each year during the anniversary month of the publication of an antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspension of investigation, an interested party, as defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), may request, in accordance with section 351.213

(2002)of the Department of Commerce (the Department) Regulations, that the Department conduct an administrative review of that antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended investigation. *Opportunity to Request a Review* Not later than the last day of May 2005, interested parties may request administrative review of the following orders, findings, or suspended investigations, with anniversary dates in May for the following periods: Antidumping Duty Proceeding Period ARGENTINA: Light-walled Rectangular Carbon Steel Pipe and Tubing A-357-802 5/1/04—4/30/05 BELGIUM: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils A-423-808 5/1/04—4/30/05 BRAZIL: Iron Construction Castings A-351-503 5/1/04—4/30/05 BRAZIL: Frozen Concentrated Orange Juice A-351-605 5/1/04—8/4/04 CANADA: Softwood Lumber A-122-838 5/1/04—4/30/05 CANADA: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils A-122-830 5/1/04—4/30/05 Antifriction Bearings, Ball and Spherical Plain A-427-801 5/1/04—4/30/05 GERMANY: Antifriction Bearings, Ball A-428-801 5/1/04—4/30/05 INDIA: Silicomanganese A-533-823 5/1/04—4/30/05 INDIA: Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes A-533-502 5/1/04—4/30/05 INDONESIA: Extruded Rubber Thread A-560-803 5/1/04—5/20/04 ITALY: Antifriction Bearings, Ball A-475-801 5/1/04—4/30/05 ITALY: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils A-475-822 5/1/04—4/30/05 JAPAN: Antifriction Bearings, Ball A-588-804 5/1/04—4/30/05 JAPAN: Gray Portland Cement and Clinker A-588-815 5/1/04—4/30/05 JAPAN: Stainless Steel Angle A-588-856 5/1/04—4/30/05 KAZAKHSTAN: Silicomanganese A-834-807 5/1/04—4/30/05 REPUBLIC OF KOREA: Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings, Other than Grooved A-580-507 5/1/04—2/27/05 REPUBLIC OF KOREA: Polyester Staple Fiber A-580-812 5/1/04—4/30/05 REPUBLIC OF KOREA: Stainless Steel Angle A-580-846 5/1/04—4/30/05 REPUBLIC OF KOREA: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils A-580-831 5/1/04—4/30/05 SINGAPORE: Antifriction Bearings, Ball A-559-801 5/1/04—4/30/05 SPAIN: Stainless Steel Angle A-469-810 5/1/04—4/30/05 SOUTH AFRICA: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils A-791-805 5/1/04—4/30/05 TAIWAN: Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipe & Tubes A-583-008 5/1/04—4/30/05 TAIWAN: Polyester Staple Fiber A-583-833 5/1/04—4/30/05 TAIWAN: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils A-583-830 5/1/04—4/30/05 THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Iron Construction Castings A-570-502 5/1/04—4/30/05 THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Pure Magnesium A-570-832 5/1/04—4/30/05 THE UNITED KINGDOM:Antifriction Bearings, Ball A-412-801 5/1/04—4/30/05 TURKEY: Welded Carbon Steel Pipe and Tube A-489-501 5/1/04—4/30/05 VENEZUELA: Silicomanganese A-307-820 5/1/04—4/30/05 Countervailing Duty Proceedings BELGIUM: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils C-423-809 1/1/04—12/31/04 BRAZIL: Iron Construction Castings C-351-504 1/1/04—12/31/04 CANADA: Softwood Lumber C-122-839 1/1/04—12/31/04 ITALY: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils C-475-823 1/1/04—12/31/04 SOUTH AFRICA: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils C-791-806 1/1/04—12/31/04 Suspension Agreements None. In accordance with section 351.213(b) of the regulations, an interested party as defined by section 771(9) of the Act may request in writing that the Secretary conduct an administrative review. For both antidumping and countervailing duty reviews, the interested party must specify the individual producers or exporters covered by an antidumping finding or an antidumping or countervailing duty order or suspension agreement for which it is requesting a review, and the requesting party must state why it desires the Secretary to review those particular producers or exporters. If the interested party intends for the Secretary to review sales of merchandise by an exporter (or a producer if that producer also exports merchandise from other suppliers) which were produced in more than one country of origin and each country of origin is subject to a separate order, then the interested party must state specifically, on an order-by-order basis, which exporter(s) the request is intended to cover. As explained in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 69 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), the Department has clarified its practice with respect to the collection of final antidumping duties on imports of merchandise where intermediate firms are involved. The public should be aware of this clarification in determining whether to request an administrative review of merchandise subject to antidumping findings and orders. See also the Import Administration web site at http://ia.ita.doc.gov. Six copies of the request should be submitted to the Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Room 1870, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230. The Department also asks parties to serve a copy of their requests to the Office of Antidumping/Countervailing Operations, Attention: Sheila Forbes, in room 3065 of the main Commerce Building. Further, in accordance with section 351.303(f)(l)(i) of the regulations, a copy of each request must be served on every party on the Department's service list. The Department will publish in the **Federal Register** a notice of “Initiation of Administrative Review of Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation” for requests received by the last day of May 2005. If the Department does not receive, by the last day of May 2005, a request for review of entries covered by an order, finding, or suspended investigation listed in this notice and for the period identified above, the Department will instruct Customs and Border Protection to assess antidumping or countervailing duties on those entries at a rate equal to the cash deposit of (or bond for) estimated antidumping or countervailing duties required on those entries at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption and to continue to collect the cash deposit previously ordered. This notice is not required by statute but is published as a service to the international trading community. Dated: April 26, 2005. Holly A. Kuga, Senior Office Director, AD/CVD Operations, Office 4, for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E5-2095 Filed 4-29-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Initiation of Five-Year (“Sunset”) Reviews AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: In accordance with section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (“the Act”), the Department of Commerce (“the Department”) is automatically initiating five-year (“sunset”) reviews of certain antidumping and countervailing duty orders. The International Trade Commission (“the Commission”) is publishing concurrently with this notice its notice of *Institution of Five-Year Review* which covers these same orders. DATES: *Effective Date:* May 2, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Zev Primor, Office 4, AD/CVD Operations, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce at

(202)482-4114, or Mary Messer, Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission at

(202)205-3193. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The Department's procedures for the conduct of sunset reviews are set forth in 19 CFR 351.218. Guidance on methodological or analytical issues relevant to the Department's conduct of sunset reviews is set forth in the Department's Policy Bulletin 98.3— *Policies Regarding the Conduct of Five-Year (“Sunset”) Reviews of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders; Policy Bulletin,* 63 FR 18871 (April 16, 1998) (“ *Sunset Policy Bulletin* ”). Initiation of Reviews In accordance with 19 CFR 351.218(c), we are initiating the sunset reviews of the following antidumping and countervailing duty orders and suspended investigation: DOC case No. ITC case No. Country Product A-570-855 731-TA-841 PRC Non-Frozen Apple Juice Concentrate. A-851-802 731-TA-846 Czech Republic Small Diameter, Carbon & Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, & Pressure Pipe. A-588-851 731-TA-847 Japan Small Diameter, Carbon & Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, & Pressure Pipe. A-485-805 731-TA-849 Romania Small Diameter, Carbon & Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, & Pressure Pipe. A-791-808 731-TA-850 South Africa Small Diameter, Carbon & Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, & Pressure Pipe. A-588-850 731-TA-847 Japan Large Diameter, Carbon & Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, & Pressure Pipe. A-201-827 731-TA-848 Mexico Large Diameter, Carbon & Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, & Pressure Pipe. A-588-810 731-TA-429 Japan Mechanical Transfer Presses. A-588-852 731-TA-853 Japan Structural Steel Beams. A-580-841 731-TA-854 South Korea Structural Steel Beams. C-580-842 701-TA-401 South Korea Structural Steel Beams. A-533-806 731-TA-561 India Sulfanilic Acid. C-533-807 701-TA-318 India Sulfanilic Acid. A-570-815 731-TA-538 PRC Sulfanilic Acid. A-570-856 731-TA-851 PRC Synthetic Indigo. Filing Information As a courtesy, we are making information related to sunset proceedings, including copies of the Department's regulations regarding sunset reviews (19 CFR 351.218) and *Sunset Policy Bulletin,* the Department's schedule of sunset reviews, case history information ( *i.e.* , previous margins, duty absorption determinations, scope language, import volumes), and service lists available to the public on the Department's sunset Internet website at the following address: “ *http://ia.ita.doc.gov/sunset/.* ” All submissions in these sunset reviews must be filed in accordance with the Department's regulations regarding format, translation, service, and certification of documents. These rules can be found at 19 CFR 351.303. Also, we suggest that parties check the Department's sunset website for any updates to the service list before filing any submissions. The Department will make additions to and/or deletions from the service list provided on the sunset website based on notifications from parties and participation in these reviews. Specifically, the Department will delete from the service list all parties that do not submit a substantive response to the notice of initiation. Because deadlines in a sunset review can be very short, we urge interested parties to apply for access to proprietary information under administrative protective order (“APO”) immediately following publication in the **Federal Register** of the notice of initiation of the sunset review. The Department's regulations on submission of proprietary information and eligibility to receive access to business proprietary information under APO can be found at 19 CFR 351.304-306. Information Required From Interested Parties Domestic interested parties (defined in section 771(9)(C), (D), (E), (F), and

(G)of the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b)) wishing to participate in these sunset reviews must respond not later than 15 days after the date of publication in the **Federal Register** of the notice of initiation by filing a notice of intent to participate. The required contents of the notice of intent to participate are set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(ii). In accordance with the Department's regulations, if we do not receive a notice of intent to participate from at least one domestic interested party by the 15-day deadline, the Department will automatically revoke the orders without further review. *See* 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii). If we receive an order-specific notice of intent to participate from a domestic interested party, the Department's regulations provide that all parties wishing to participate in the sunset review must file complete substantive responses not later than 30 days after the date of publication in the **Federal Register** of the notice of initiation. The required contents of a substantive response, on an order-specific basis, are set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note that certain information requirements differ for respondent and domestic parties. Also, note that the Department's information requirements are distinct from the Commission's information requirements. Please consult the Department's regulations for information regarding the Department's conduct of sunset reviews. 1 Please consult the Department's regulations at 19 CFR Part 351 for definitions of terms and for other general information concerning antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings at the Department. 1 In comments made on the interim final sunset regulations, a number of parties stated that the proposed five-day period for rebuttals to substantive responses to a notice of initiation was insufficient. This requirement was retained in the final sunset regulations at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(4). As provided in 19 CFR 351.302(b), however, the Department will consider individual requests for extension of that five-day deadline based upon a showing of good cause. This notice of initiation is being published in accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c). Dated: April 25, 2005. Holly A. Kuga, Senior Office Director, AD/CVD Operations, Office 4 for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E5-2096 Filed 4-29-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration A-274-804 Notice of Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Trinidad and Tobago AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (“the Department”) is initiating a changed circumstances administrative review of the antidumping duty order of carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod (“steel wire rod”) from Trinidad and Tobago 1 in response to a request from the petitioners 2 and respondent, Caribbean Ispat Limited (“CIL”). Both parties have requested that the Department conduct a changed circumstances review to determine whether Mittal Steel Point Lisas Limited (“Mittal”) is the successor-in-interest to CIL, and, as such, is entitled to receive the same antidumping duty treatment accorded CIL. 1 *See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Trinidad and Tobago* , 67 FR 65944 (October 29, 2002) (“ *Antidumping Order* ) 2 Gerdau Ameristeel U.S. Inc., ISG Georgetown Inc., Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc., and North Star Steel Texas, Inc. EFFECTIVE DATE: May 2, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dennis McClure or Victoria Cho at

(202)482-5973 or

(202)482-5075, respectively; AD/CVD Operations, Office 3, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: *Background:* On October 29, 2002, the Department published in the **Federal Register** an antidumping duty order on steel wire rod from Trinidad and Tobago. *See Antidumping Order* . The current scope of the merchandise subject to this order was published in the *Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Trinidad and Tobago* 70 FR 12648 (March 15, 2005). One of the companies subject to the investigation was CIL. On March 3, 2005, CIL notified the Department of its name change and stated that on January 31, 2005, CIL legally changed its name to Mittal. *See* March 3, 2005, letter from CIL to the Secretary of Commerce. On March 21, 2005, the petitioners requested that the Department conduct a changed circumstances review to determine whether Mittal is the successor-in-interest to CIL. *See* March 21, 2005, letter from the petitioners to the Secretary of Commerce. On April 6, 2005, CIL requested that the Department initiate and conduct an expedited changed circumstances review to determine for purposes of the antidumping law whether Mittal is the successor-in-interest to CIL. The Department has determined to conduct the review on an expedited basis and preliminarily finds that Mittal is the successor-in-interest to CIL. Initiation of Changed Circumstances Review Pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (“the Act'), the Department will conduct a changed circumstances review upon request from an interested party or receipt of information concerning an antidumping duty order, when either of these shows changed circumstances sufficient to warrant a review of the order. In this case, the Department finds that the information submitted by the petitioners and respondent provides sufficient evidence of changed circumstances to warrant a review to determine whether Mittal is the successor-in-interest to CIL. Thus, in accordance with section 751(b) of the Act, the Department is initiating a changed circumstances review to determine whether Mittal is the successor-in-interest to CIL for purposes of determining antidumping duty liability with respect to imports of steel wire rod from Trinidad and Tobago produced and exported by CIL and whether the order as applied to CIL should apply to subject merchandise manufactured and exported by Mittal. Furthermore, 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii) permits the Department to combine the notice of initiation of a changed circumstances review and the notice of preliminary results in a single notice, if the Department concludes that expedited action is warranted. In this case, the Department finds that the information submitted provides sufficient evidence of changed circumstances to warrant a review. Furthermore, we determine that expedited action is warranted and we preliminarily find that Mittal is the successor-in-interest to CIL. Because we have concluded that expedited action is warranted, we are combining these notices of initiation and preliminary results. Preliminary Results In making a successor-in-interest determination, the Department examines several factors including, but not limited to, changes in:

(1)Management;

(2)production facilities;

(3)supplier relationships; and

(4)customer base. *See,* *e.g.* , Notice of Final Results of Changed Circumstances Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Polychloroprene Rubber From Japan, 67 FR 58 (Jan. 2, 2002); *Brass Sheet and Strip from Canada: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review* , 57 FR 20460, 20462 (May 13, 1992). While no single factor or combination of factors will necessarily provide a dispositive indication of a successor-in-interest relationship, the Department will generally consider the new company to be the successor to the previous company if the new company's resulting operation is not materially dissimilar to that of its predecessor. *See* , *e.g.* , Fresh and Chilled Atlantic Salmon from Norway; Final Results of Changed Circumstances Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 64 FR 9979 (March 1, 1999); *Industrial Phosphoric Acid from Israel; Final Results of Changed Circumstances Review* , 59 FR 6944 (February 14, 1994). Thus, if the evidence demonstrates that, with respect to the production and sale of the subject merchandise, the new company operates as the same business entity as the former company, the Department will accord the new company the same antidumping treatment as its predecessor. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii), we preliminarily determine that Mittal is the successor- in-interest to CIL. In its April 6, 2005, submission Mittal provided evidence supporting its claim to be the successor-in-interest to CIL. Documentation attached to Mittal's April 6, 2005, submission shows that the acquisition of LNM Holdings by Ispat International N.V. (CIL's parent company) and the following name change to CIL resulted in little or no change in management, production facility, supplier relationships, or customer base. This documentation consists of:

(1)A press release regarding the name change of Ispat International N.V.;

(2)Ispat International N.V.'s Prospectus;

(3)a certificate of amendment from the Government of Trinidad and Tobago reflecting the name change, and including the articles of amendment, and a copy of the shareholder resolution authorizing the name change;

(4)a letter from the Companies Registry of Trinidad and Tobago stating that Mittal and CIL are one and the same legal entity;

(5)documentation illustrating that Mittal and CIL have been assigned the same taxpayer file number and maintain the same bank account;

(6)organizational charts that illustrate essentially the same management and organizational structure;

(7)a listing of CIL's and Mittal's board of directors which are exactly the same;

(8)a letter from the lessor stating that Mittal will occupy the same premises and continue CIL's lease under the name of Mittal;

(9)a list of CIL's suppliers and a sample letter from Mittal to one of its suppliers explaining that CIL has legally changed its name to Mittal and that there will be no change in corporate identity of the company; and

(10)a list of customers identifying the same customers before and after the name change as well as a sample letter to the customers explaining the name change. The documentation described above demonstrates that there was little to no change in management structure, supplier relationships, production facilities, or customer base. For these reasons, we preliminarily find that Mittal is the successor-in-interest to CIL and, thus, should receive the same antidumping duty treatment with respect to steel wire rod from Trinidad and Tobago as the former CIL. Public Comment Any interested party may request a hearing within 30 days of publication of this notice. Any hearing, if requested, will be held no later than 44 days after the date of publication of this notice, or the first workday thereafter. Case briefs from interested parties may be submitted not later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to the issues raised in those comments, may be filed not later than 37 days after the date of publication of this notice. All written comments shall be submitted in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303. Persons interested in attending the hearing, if one is requested, should contact the Department for the date and time of the hearing. The Department will publish the final results of this changed circumstances review, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.216(e), including the results of its analysis of issues raised in any written comments. The current requirement for a cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties on all subject merchandise will continue unless and until it is modified pursuant to the final results of this changed circumstances review. We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 777(i)(1) and

(2)of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216. Dated: April 26, 2005. Barbara E. Tillman, Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E5-2094 Filed 4-29-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration A-570-851 Certain Preserved Mushrooms from the People's Republic of China: Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of the Fifth Antidumping Duty Review AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. EFFECTIVE DATE: May 2, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amber Musser at

(202)482-1777, AD/CVD Enforcement, Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, 20230. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On March 7, 2005, the Department of Commerce (“the Department”) published the preliminary results of the fifth administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain preserved mushrooms from the People's Republic of China. *See Certain Preserved Mushrooms from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Fifth Antidumping Duty Administrative Review* , 70 FR 10965 (March 7, 2005) (“Preliminary Results”). The results of this administrative review are currently due no later than July 5, 2005. Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of Review Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (“the Act”), the Department shall make a final determination in an administrative review of an antidumping duty order within 120 days after the date on which the preliminary results are published. If it is not practicable to complete the review within the foregoing time, the administering authority may extend that 120-day period to 180 days. In this case, the Department finds that it is not practicable to complete the final results in the administrative review of certain preserved mushrooms from the PRC within the current time frame due to the need to analyze information found during verifications in March and April 2005. Therefore, in accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the Department is extending the time for completion of the final results of this review until September 6, 2005, which is the next business day after 180 days from the date of the publication of the *Preliminary Results* . Additionally, the deadlines for submitting case briefs and rebuttal briefs are extended. The current deadline for case briefs is May 2, 2005, and the current deadline for rebuttal briefs is May 9, 2005. The Department is extending the deadline for case briefs until June 24, 2005, and for rebuttal briefs until July 1, 2005. A hearing will be scheduled after case briefs and rebuttal briefs have been received. This notice is issued and published in accordance with Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Dated: April 25, 2005. Barbara E. Tillman, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E5-2093 Filed 4-29-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Article 1904; Binational Panel Reviews: Notice of Termination of Panel Review AGENCY: NAFTA Secretariat, United States Section, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. ACTION: Notice of Consent Motion to Terminate the Panel Review of the final antidumping duty administrative review made by the International Trade Administration, respecting Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Canada (Secretariat File No. USA-CDA-2004-1904-02). SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Notice of Consent Motion to Terminate the Panel Review by the complainants, the panel review is terminated as of April 26, 2005. No panel has been appointed to this panel review. Pursuant to Rule 71(2) of the *Rules of Procedure for Article 1904 Binational Panel Review,* this panel review is terminated. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Caratina L. Alston, United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Suite 2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20230,

(202)482-5438. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter 19 of the North American Free-Trade Agreement (“Agreement”) establishes a mechanism to replace domestic judicial review of final determinations in antidumping and countervailing duty cases involving imports from a NAFTA country with review by independent binational panels. When a Request for Panel Review is filed, a panel is established to act in place of national courts to review expeditiously the final determination to determine whether it conforms with the antidumping or countervailing duty law of the country that made the determination. Under Article 1904 of the Agreement, which came into force on January 1, 1994, the Government of the United States, the Government of Canada and the Government of Mexico established *Rules of Procedure for Article 1904 Binational Panel Reviews* (“Rules”). These Rules were published in the **Federal Register** on February 23, 1994 (59 FR 8686). The panel review in this matter was requested and terminated pursuant to these Rules. Dated: April 26, 2005. Caratina L. Alston, United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat. [FR Doc. 05-8642 Filed 4-29-05; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 6

Traces to 6 documents

CFR