Unknown. Final rule
3,809 words·~17 min read·
/register/2005/04/14/05-7489A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
--- schema: federal-register doc_type: fedreg source_file: FR-2005-04-14.xml --- 70 71 Thursday, April 14, 2005 Contents Agency Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality NOTICES Meetings: Technical Review Committee, 19761-19762 05-7474 Agricultural Agricultural Marketing Service PROPOSED RULES Milk marketing orders: Upper Midwest, 19709-19718 05-7462 Agriculture Agriculture Department See Agricultural Marketing Service See Forest Service Alcohol Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives Bureau NOTICES Agency information collection activities; proposals, submissions, and approvals, 19785-19786 05-7476 Antitrust Antitrust Division NOTICES National cooperative research notifications:
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 19786 05-7464 National Fenestration Rating Council, Inc., et al., 19783-19784 05-7463 Arts Arts and Humanities, National Foundation See National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Children Children and Families Administration NOTICES Agency information collection activities; proposals, submissions, and approvals, 19762 05-7517 Commerce Commerce Department See Industry and Security Bureau See International Trade Administration See National Institute of Standards and Technology See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration CITA Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements NOTICES Textile and apparel categories:
Caribbean Basin Trade Partnership Act; commercial availability— 100 percent cotton, 2x2 twill weave, flannel fabrics, 19735-19736 05-7586 Education Education Department NOTICES Grants and cooperative agreements; availability, etc.: Safe and Drug-Free Schools Programs— Emergency Response and Crisis Management Grant Program, 19736-19738 05-7531 Vocational and adult education— Tech-Prep Demonstration Program, 19739-19746 05-7526 05-7527 Energy Energy Department See Federal Energy Regulatory Commission EPA Environmental Protection Agency RULES Air programs:
Ambient air quality standards, national— Fine particles; supplemental amendments, 19844-19856 05-7227 Air quality implementation plans; approval and promulgation; various States: New Mexico, 19702-19708 05-7336 PROPOSED RULES Air quality implementation plans; approval and promulgation; various States: New Mexico, 19723-19724 05-7335 NOTICES Agency information collection activities; proposals, submissions, and approvals, 19757-19758 05-7506 Meetings: Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee, 19758-19759 05-7508 Commission for Environmental Cooperation, 19759-19760 05-7505 Water pollution control:
Total maximum daily loads— Louisiana, 19760 05-7507 Water supply: Public water supply supervision program— Georgia, 19760-19761 05-7504 FAA Federal Aviation Administration RULES Airworthiness directives: British Aerospace; correction, 19681 05-7483 Cessna, 19682-19685 05-7379 Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica, S.A. (EMBRAER), 19685-19688 05-7282 PROPOSED RULES Airworthiness directives: Learjet, 19718-19720 05-7484 Commercial space transportation: Licensing and safety requirements for launch, 19720-19721 05-7521 NOTICES Exemption petitions; summary and disposition, 19836-19837 05-7522 Federal Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission NOTICES Electric rate and corporate regulation filings, 19746-19753 E5-1753 E5-1754 E5-1755 Meetings;
Sunshine Act, 19753-19757 05-7554 Federal Law Federal Law Enforcement Training Center NOTICES Meetings: National Center for State and Local Law Enforcement Training Advisory Committee, 19777 05-7481 Federal Reserve Federal Reserve System NOTICES Banks and bank holding companies: Formations, acquisitions, and mergers, 19761 05-7454 Permissible nonbanking activities, 19761 05-7455 Fish Fish and Wildlife Service NOTICES Endangered and threatened species: Florida manatee; 5-year review, 19780 05-7477 Endangered and threatened species and marine mammal permit applications, 05-7515 19778-19780 05-7518 05-7519 Food Food and Drug Administration NOTICES Human drugs:
Drug efficacy study implementation; unlawful formulations— Parenteral multivitamin drug products, 19762-19763 05-7532 Meetings: Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee, 19763-19764 05-7458 Reports and guidance documents; availability, etc.: Exploratory investigational new drugs studies, 19764-19765 05-7485 Forest Forest Service NOTICES Environmental statements; notice of intent: Coronado National Forest, AZ, 19727 05-7480 Meetings: Resource Advisory Committees— Mendocino County, 19727 05-7457 National Forest System lands:
Outfitter and guide special use permits; maximum term, 19727-19730 05-7488 GAO Government Accountability Office RULES Practice and procedure: Bid protest regulations, 19679-19681 05-7489 Health Health and Human Services Department See Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality See Children and Families Administration See Food and Drug Administration See Indian Health Service Homeland Homeland Security See Federal Law Enforcement Training Center Homeland Homeland Security Department See U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services Housing Housing and Urban Development Department PROPOSED RULES Public and Indian housing: Public Housing Operating Fund Program, 19858-19875 05-7376 Indian Indian Health Service NOTICES Grants and cooperative agreements; availability, etc.: American Indians/Alaska Natives; Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, 19772-19777 05-7460 American Indians/Alaska Natives; Injury Prevention Program, 19765-19772 05-7459 Industry Industry and Security Bureau RULES Export administration regulations:
Chemical and biological weapons end-user/end use controls; amendments, 19688-19694 05-7523 Interior Interior Department See Fish and Wildlife Service See Reclamation Bureau See Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement Office IRS Internal Revenue Service RULES Employment taxes and collection of income taxes at source: Employee withholding exemption certificates; submission and notification guidance, 19694-19697 05-6718 Procedure and administration: Foreign business entities; classification of as corporations for Federal tax purposes, 19697-19698 05-6716 PROPOSED RULES Employment taxes and collection of income taxes at source:
Employee withholding exemption certificates; submission and notification guidance, 19721-19722 05-6719 Income taxes Foreign entities; classification, 19722-19723 05-6855 International International Trade Administration NOTICES Antidumping: Honey from— China, 19730-19731 E5-1761 Practice and procedure: Non-market economy countries; antidumping investigations; separation and combination rates; correction, 19841 Z5-1541 International International Trade Commission NOTICES Import investigations:
Disc drives, components, and products, 19782 05-7500 Justice Justice Department See Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives Bureau See Antitrust Division NOTICES Pollution control; consent judgments: American Cyanamid et al., 19782-19783 05-7469 Crossing Dev. LLC, et al., 19783 05-7465 Diamond State Salvage Co., Inc., et al., 19783 05-7467 New Orleans, LA, et al., 19784 05-7466 Outboard Marine Corp., et al., 19784-19785 05-7468 Pneumo Abex Corp., et al., 19785 05-7470 Labor Labor Department NOTICES Agency information collection activities; proposals, submissions, and approvals, 19786-19788 05-7490 05-7492 05-7493 National Foundation National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities NOTICES Privacy Act:
Systems of records, 19788-19791 05-7498 National Highway National Highway Traffic Safety Administration NOTICES Motor vehicle safety standards: Exemption petitions, etc.— DOT Chemical, 19837 05-7524 National Institute National Institute of Standards and Technology NOTICES Agency information collection activities; proposals, submissions, and approvals, 19731 05-7473 Meetings: Urban search and rescue robot performance standards; public forum, 19731-19732 05-7502 NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration RULES Fishery conservation and management:
Alaska; fisheries of Exclusive Economic Zone— Pacific cod, 19708 05-7513 PROPOSED RULES Fishery conservation and management: Northeastern United States fisheries— Georges Bank cod, haddock, and yellowtail flounder, 19724-19726 05-7514 NOTICES Agency information collection activities; proposals, submissions, and approvals, 05-7471 19732-19733 05-7472 Endangered and threatened species: Incidental take permits— Sea turtles, shortnosed sturgeon, Atlantic salmon, 19733-19734 05-7516 Meetings:
Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 19734-19735 E5-1756 South Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 19735 E5-1757 Nuclear Nuclear Regulatory Commission NOTICES Agency information collection activities; proposals, submissions, and approvals, 19791-19792 E5-1752 Pipeline Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration NOTICES Agency information collection activities; proposals, submissions, and approvals, 19837-19838 05-7530 Hazardous materials: Applications; exemptions, renewals, etc., 19838-19840 05-7528 05-7529 Reclamation Reclamation Bureau NOTICES Agency information collection activities; proposals, submissions, and approvals, 19780-19781 05-7479 SEC Securities and Exchange Commission NOTICES Agency information collection activities; proposals, submissions, and approvals, 19792-19793 E5-1760 Investment Company Act of 1940:
John Hancock Life Insurance Co. et al., 19793-19812 05-7496 John Hancock Life Insurance Co. et al.; correction, 19812 05-7602 Self-regulatory organizations; proposed rule changes: Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc., 19812-19820 E5-1758 Social Social Security Administration NOTICES Agency information collection activities; proposals, submissions, and approvals, 19820-19821 05-7451 Grants and cooperative agreements; availability, etc.: Benefit Offset Pilot Demonstration, 19821-19825 05-7450 State State Department NOTICES Grants and cooperative agreements; availability, etc.:
Study of U.S. Institute for Bolivian indigeneous student leaders, 19825-19830 05-7511 U.S. national security policymaking in post 9/11 world, 19831-19836 05-7510 Surface Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement Office RULES Permanent program and abandoned mine land reclamation plan submissions: Virginia, 19698-19702 05-7495 NOTICES Agency information collection activities; proposals, submissions, and approvals, 19781-19782 05-7499 Textile Textile Agreements Implementation Committee See Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements Transportation Transportation Department See Federal Aviation Administration See National Highway Traffic Safety Administration See Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Treasury Treasury Department See Internal Revenue Service MISSING FOR:
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services NOTICES Agency information collection activities; proposals, submissions, and approvals, 19777-19778 05-7456 Separate Parts In This Issue Part II Environmental Protection Agency, 19844-19856 05-7227 Part III Housing and Urban Development Department, 19858-19875 05-7376 Reader Aids Consult the Reader Aids section at the end of this issue for phone numbers, online resources, finding aids, reminders, and notice of recently enacted public laws.
To subscribe to the Federal Register Table of Contents LISTSERV electronic mailing list, go to http://listserv.access.gpo.gov and select Online mailing list archives, FEDREGTOC-L, Join or leave the list (or change settings); then follow the instructions. 70 71 Thursday, April 14, 2005 Rules and Regulations GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE 4 CFR Part 21 Government Accountability Office, Administrative Practice and Procedure, Bid Protest Regulations, Government Contracts AGENCY:
Government Accountability Office. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: This document amends Government Accountability Office
(GAO)Bid Protest Regulations by revising the definition of an interested party to permit a protest to be filed by an agency tender official
(ATO)in certain public-private competitions under Office of Management and Budget
(OMB)Circular A-76. This document also revises the definition of an intervenor to permit an ATO and an employee representative to intervene in certain protests involving public-private competitions under OMB Circular A-76. This action implements the provisions of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 related to the bid protest process, where a public-private competition has been conducted under OMB Circular A-76 regarding an activity or function of a Federal agency performed by more than 65 full-time equivalent
(FTE)employees of the Federal agency. DATES: Effective April 14, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel I. Gordon (Managing Associate General Counsel), Michael R. Golden (Assistant General Counsel), Linda S. Lebowitz (Senior Attorney), or Paul N. Wengert (Senior Attorney), 202-512-9732. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective Dates Section 326(d) of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005, Pub. L. 108-375, 118 Stat. 1811, 1848, states that the provisions apply to protests “that relate to studies initiated under Office of Management and Budget Circular A-76 on or after the end of the 90-day period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.” The date of enactment was October 28, 2004 and, therefore, the end of the 90-day period was January 26, 2005. Protests filed after the effective date of this final rule that relate to studies initiated under OMB Circular A-76 on or after January 26, 2005, will be considered under this final rule. Protests filed at GAO after the effective date of this final rule that relate to studies initiated under OMB Circular A-76 before January 26, 2005, will be considered under GAO's regulations as they were prior to the issuance of this final rule. The same is true for
(1)protests filed on or after the effective date of this rule that supplement or amend a protest filed at GAO before the effective date of this rule and
(2)claims and requests for reconsideration filed on or after the effective date of this rule that concern a protest that was not subject to this rule. Background On December 20, 2004, GAO published a proposed rule (69 FR 75878) and a correction on December 23, 2004 (69 FR 76979) in which it proposed to amend its Bid Protest Regulations. The supplementary information included with the proposed rule explained that the proposed revisions to GAO's regulations, promulgated in accordance with the Competition in Contracting Act of 1984 (CICA), 31 U.S.C. 3551-3556, were to implement the requirements in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 regarding standing to protest to GAO by an in-house competitor in a public-private competition. GAO addressed the in-house competitor standing issue in *Dan Duefrene; Kelley Dull; Brenda Neuerburg; Gabrielle Martin* , B-293590.2 *et al.* , Apr. 19, 2004, 2004 CPD ¶ 82. In that decision, GAO concluded that, notwithstanding the May 29, 2003 revisions to OMB Circular A-76, the in-house competitor in a public-private competition conducted under the Circular was not an offeror and, therefore, under the then-current language of CICA, a representative of an in-house competitor was not an interested party eligible to maintain a protest before GAO. On the same day that the *Dan Duefrene* decision was issued, the Comptroller General sent a letter to the cognizant congressional committees, explaining that, because an in-house competitor did not meet the then-current CICA definition of an interested party, GAO was required to dismiss any protest that an in-house competitor filed. In the letter, the Comptroller General recognized that policy considerations, including the principles unanimously agreed to by the congressionally-chartered Commercial Activities Panel, weighed in favor of allowing certain protests by in-house competitors with respect to A-76 competitions and, as a result, Congress might want to consider amending CICA to allow GAO to decide such protests. Consistent with that letter, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 amended CICA to permit certain protests by in-house competitors. The revisions to GAO's Bid Protest Regulations in this final rule implement the statutory provisions. Summary of Comments Interested persons were invited to submit comments on GAO's proposed rule by February 18, 2005. GAO received written comments from two federal agencies, five organizations representing contractors, seven unions, and three individuals. In adopting this final rule, GAO has carefully considered all comments received. A summary of the more significant specific comments concerning GAO's proposed rule, and GAO's responses to these comments, are set forth below. As a general matter, and perhaps reflecting the fact that the proposed rule closely followed the statute, the agencies, one individual commenter, and five of the organizations representing contractors agreed that the proposed regulations correctly implemented the statutory language. On the other hand, while not directly addressing whether the proposed regulations correctly implemented the statute, the seven unions and one individual commenter questioned whether the law, as well as the proposed regulations, provided effective protest rights for the employees whose jobs were placed at risk by these A-76 competitions. Section 21.0—Definitions Interested Party A number of commenters were concerned that the proposed revision to the definition of an “interested party” would preclude an ATO from protesting a competition involving a function with 65 or fewer FTEs. That is, because it is defined as an interested party only for competitions related to functions performed by more than 65 FTEs, the ATO cannot file a protest at GAO where an agency conducts a competition (whether standard or streamlined) involving a function performed by 65 or fewer FTEs. While two commenters agreed with this aspect of the proposed rule, five commenters urged GAO to extend the revised definitions of an interested party in sec. 21.0(a)(2) and of an intervenor in sec. 21.0(b)(2) to include all public-private competitions conducted under OMB Circular A-76, regardless of the number of FTEs involved, where the federal agency uses the procurement system to conduct the competition. Two additional commenters recognized that such an extension would be inconsistent with the language of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005, but expressed disagreement with the statute. One commenter urged GAO to impose parity by refusing to consider a protest from a private-sector entity in such cases if the public-sector competitor could not file a protest. GAO recognizes a lack of parity may arise in certain situations: unlike an ATO, a private-sector competitor could have standing to file a protest of a standard A-76 competition involving fewer than 65 FTEs, and of a streamlined A-76 competition, if the agency had issued a solicitation and thereby used the procurement system to determine whether to contract out or to perform work in-house. GAO concludes, however, that the rule appropriately follows the statutory language, which grants interested party and intervenor status to designated parties only in the case of an A-76 competition regarding an activity or function of a Federal agency performed by more than 65 FTEs. In GAO's view, it is for Congress to determine the circumstances under which an in-house entity has standing to protest the conduct of an A-76 competition, and the 2004 statutory changes limited public-sector standing to competitions involving an activity or function of a Federal agency performed by more than 65 FTEs of the Federal agency. Moreover, GAO believes that it would not be consistent with CICA for GAO, in an attempt to achieve parity in a competition related to functions with fewer than 65 FTEs, to refuse to consider a private-sector offeror's protest that is otherwise within GAO's bid protest jurisdiction. Finally, one commenter objected on the basis that an ATO who files a protest is acting unconstitutionally. Determining the constitutionality of the statutory provisions authorizing ATO protests is beyond the scope of this rulemaking and, indeed, beyond GAO's bid protest function. *See Urban Group, Inc.; McSwain & Assocs., Inc.* , B-281352, B-281353, Jan. 28, 1999, 99-1 CPD ¶ 25 at 8. Intervenor One commenter asked that notices of protests be provided to the ATO to allow timely intervention. GAO believes that the requirement in the existing rule for notice to potential intervenors applies and that the existing rule is sufficient to require an agency to provide appropriate notice to the ATO. Another commenter asked that GAO allow an ATO to intervene only if an employee representative failed to intervene. Two commenters asked GAO to provide standards that a putative employee representative intervenor would have to satisfy in order to be allowed to participate as an intervenor. Two commenters stated that the Federal agency should be permitted to set standards for the putative employee representative intervenor. Three commenters requested that GAO treat a union as presumptively authorized to intervene where it represents affected employees. GAO believes that it is not possible to anticipate the variety of factual circumstances in which requests to intervene by either ATOs or employee representatives, or both, will occur and, therefore, it is not yet appropriate to set forth standards for how those situations will be resolved. At this time, therefore, GAO will implement the rule as proposed. GAO recognizes that the result may be that two presumably aligned parties (the ATO and the employee representative) may present somewhat different views to GAO. Notwithstanding any difficulty that this result could create, GAO believes that Congress intended that an employee representative could qualify as an intervenor whether or not the ATO is also a party (either as a protester or as an intervenor). In this connection, the conference report stated that “[a] person representing a majority of the employees would not have standing to file a protest, but would have the right to intervene in a protest filed by an interested party, including the ATO.” H.R. Rep. No. 108-767, at 648 (2004), *reprinted* in 150 Cong. Rec. H9187, H9527 (daily ed. Oct. 8, 2004). Protective Order Practice As noted in the background to the proposed rule, GAO did not propose to address protective order issues in the rule changes, but GAO solicited comments on how those issues should be handled where an ATO and/or employee representative is participating in a protest. Two commenters urged GAO to require counsel for an ATO to apply for admission to a protective order under standards tailored to the role of ATO counsel. One additional commenter opposed requiring application for protective order admission by ATO counsel, but urged GAO to “admit” ATO counsel to the protective order if the agency provided certain protections against disclosure of protected material. One other commenter asked GAO to specify the sanctions that would be imposed on an employee representative or ATO if there were an unauthorized disclosure of protected material. GAO believes that it is premature to provide definitive guidance regarding the access to protected information by the ATO, the employee representative, and their attorneys. Nonetheless, several points of guidance can be offered here. GAO believes that where counsel for the ATO or for the employee representative is not a government employee, that attorney will be required to apply for admission under existing standards established for admission to a protective order. As for the ATO and the employee representative, those individuals would presumably not be provided access to protected information under the protective order, just as non-attorneys in other protests cannot obtain such access. In cases where counsel for the ATO, or for the employee representative, is a government employee, GAO will proceed on a case-by-case basis, with appropriate weight given to the agency's views and, in particular, to the access that the agency has given the attorney to proprietary or source selection sensitive documents before the protest was filed. As the practice develops, and experience is gained by all sides, GAO intends to develop, and publish, uniform procedures that can be incorporated into the bid protest process and, if warranted, into GAO's Bid Protest Regulations. Issues Not for GAO Review One commenter requested that GAO specify that the prohibition against protests challenging the decision of an ATO to file (or not to file) a protest should explicitly reference its applicability to A-76 competitions involving more than 65 FTEs. GAO believes that the additional language is unnecessary because the proposed rule already encompasses the requested limitation in sec. 21.0. GAO believes that sec. 21.5(k) comports with the statutory intent that the decision of an ATO regarding whether to file a protest is not subject to GAO review. List of Subjects in 4 CFR Part 21 Administrative practice and procedure, Bid protest regulations, Government contracts, Government procurement. For the reasons set out in the preamble, title 4, chapter I, subchapter B, part 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended to read as follows: PART 21—BID PROTEST REGULATIONS 1. The authority citation for part 21 continues to read as follows: Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3551-3556. 2. Amend § 21.0 by redesignating paragraph
(a)as paragraph (a)(1) and adding new paragraph (a)(2), and by redesignating paragraph
(b)as paragraph (b)(1) and adding new paragraph (b)(2) to read as follows: § 21.0 Definitions. (a)(1) * * *
(2)In a public-private competition conducted under Office of Management and Budget Circular A-76 regarding an activity or function of a Federal agency performed by more than 65 full-time equivalent employees of the Federal agency, the official responsible for submitting the Federal agency tender is also an *interested party* . (b)(1) * * *
(2)If an interested party files a protest in connection with a public-private competition conducted under Office of Management and Budget Circular A-76 regarding an activity or function of a Federal agency performed by more than 65 full-time equivalent employees of the Federal agency, a person representing a majority of the employees of the Federal agency who are engaged in the performance of the activity or function subject to the public-private competition and the official responsible for submitting the Federal agency tender as described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section may also be *intervenors* . 3. Amend § 21.5 by adding paragraph
(k)to read as follows: § 21.5 Protest issues not for consideration.
(k)*Decision whether or not to file a protest on behalf of Federal employees.* GAO will not review the decision of an agency tender official to file a protest or not to file a protest in connection with a public-private competition. Anthony H. Gamboa, General Counsel, United States Government Accountability Office. [FR Doc. 05-7489 Filed 4-13-05; 8:45 am]
Connections4 off-index
4 references not yet in our index
- 4 CFR 21
- Pub. L. 108-375
- 118 Stat. 1811
- 31 USC 3551-3556
Citation graph
cites case law
Unknown
Final rule
Cite4 CFR 21
Pub. L.Pub. L. 108-375
Stat.118 Stat. 1811
Cite31 USC 3551-3556
Cites 4Cited by 0 across 0 sources