Notices. Notice of information collection under OMB review

7,140 words·~32 min read·/register/2005/02/07/05-2294

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4510-30-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-55,518] BASF Corporation, Freeport, TX; Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration On January 12, 2005, the Department of Labor issued a Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration applicable to the subject firm. The Notice will soon be published in the **Federal Register** . The initial investigation found that workers are separately identifiable by product line (polycaprolactum, oxo, diols, and acrylic monomers), that polycaprolactum, oxo and diol production increased during the relevant period, and that the subject company neither increased imports of acrylic monomers during the relevant period nor shifted acrylic monomer production abroad.

The petitioner asserted in the request for reconsideration that the worker separations at the subject firm were the result of a shift of production of acrylic monomers to China. During the reconsideration investigation, it was found that workers are not separately identifiable by product line and that acrylic monomer production declined during the relevant period. New information provided by the subject company revealed that company imports of acrylic monomer increased after the company shifted acrylic monomer production to China in 2004.

The investigation also revealed that all criteria have been met in regard to alternative trade adjustment assistance. A significant number or proportion of the worker group are age fifty years or over and workers possess skills that are not easily transferable. Competitive conditions within the industry are adverse. Conclusion After careful review of the additional facts obtained on reconsideration, I conclude that a shift of production to China followed by increased imports of acrylic monomers contributed importantly to worker separations at the subject firm.

In accordance with the provisions of the Act, I make the following certification: All workers of BASF Corporation, Freeport, Texas, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after August 30, 2003, through two years from the date of this certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.

Signed in Washington, DC this 21st day of January 2005. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5-459 Filed 2-4-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-55,594] Bosch-Rexroth Corporation, Mobile Hydraulics Division, Wooster, OH; Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at Bosch-Rexroth Corporation, Mobile Hydraulics Division, Wooster, Ohio.

The application contained no new substantial information which would bear importantly on the Department's determination. Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued. TA-W-55,594; Bosch-Rexroth Corporation, Mobile Hydraulics Division, Wooster, Ohio (January 25, 2005). Signed at Washington, DC this 31st day of January 2005. Timothy Sullivan, Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5-454 Filed 2-4-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-55,799] CDI Professional Services Workers at General Dynamics Land Systems, California Technical Center, Goleta, CA;

Notice of Negative Determination on Reconsideration On December 30, 2004, the Department issued an Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for the workers and former workers of the subject firm. The Department's Notice was published in the **Federal Register** on January 21, 2005 (70 FR 3226). The petition for the workers of CDI Professional Services, workers at General Dynamics Land Systems, California Technical Center, Goleta, California was terminated because the petitioning workers were covered by an earlier denial (TA-W-55,658) and no new information or change in circumstances was evident to warrant a reversal of the previous determination.

The petitioner contends that the Department erred in its determination and alleges that the workers support Saudi Arabia National Guard

(SANG)turret production which shifted from Goleta, California to London, Canada. A company official was contacted for clarification in regard to the nature of the work performed by the subject worker group. The official stated that the subject workers were engaged in the engineering, designing and repair of SANG turrets. SANG turrets are produced in Australia and then sent to Canada to be attached to the appropriate vehicle. The official further clarified that work related to the SANG turrets shifted from Goleta, California to Woodbridge, Virginia in 2004. Conclusion After reconsideration, I affirm the original notice of negative determination of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance for workers and former workers of CDI Professional Services working at General Dynamics Land Systems, California Technical Center, Goleta, California. Signed at Washington, DC this 28th day of January 2005. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5-456 Filed 2-4-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-55,767] Lenox, Inc., Oxford, NC; Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration By letter dated December 9, 2004, a company official requested administrative reconsideration regarding the Department's Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance applicable to the workers of the subject firm. The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination issued on November 9, 2004, based on the finding that petitioning workers did not produce an article within the relevant time period. The denial notice was published in the **Federal Register** on December 9, 2004 (69 FR 71428). To support the request for reconsideration, the company official supplied additional information. Upon further review, it was revealed that the petitioning workers were members of the workforce that was certified eligible for TAA benefits, whose certification expired on October 11, 2004. The investigation revealed that petitioning workers remained employed at the subject facility after the stoppage of the production and beyond the date of the TAA certification for the purpose of completion of the transfer of the inventory and removal of the remaining equipment from the subject facility. Conclusion After careful review of the additional facts obtained on reconsideration, I conclude that increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with those produced at Lenox, Inc., Oxford, North Carolina, contributed importantly to the declines in sales or production and to the total or partial separation of workers at the subject firm. In accordance with the provisions of the Act, I make the following certification: All workers of Lenox, Inc., Oxford, North Carolina who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after October 11, 2004 through two years from the date of this certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974. Signed in Washington, DC this 18th day of January 2005. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5-460 Filed 2-4-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-56,059] Louisiana Pacific Corporation, OSB-Woodland, Baileyville, ME; Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration of Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance By letter dated January 24, 2005, the state official requested administrative reconsideration regarding Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA). The negative determination was signed on January 10, 2005 and will be soon published in the **Federal Register** . The workers of Louisiana Pacific Corporation, OSB-Woodland, Baileyville, Maine were certified eligible to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance

(TAA)on January 10, 2005. The initial ATAA investigation determined that the skills of the subject worker group are easily transferable to other positions in the local area. The state official provided documentation with the request for reconsideration which contains evidence that the skills of the workers at the subject firm are not easily transferable in the local commuting area. Additional investigation has determined that the workers possess skills that are not easily transferable. A significant number or proportion of the worker group are age fifty or over. Competitive conditions within the industry are adverse. Conclusion After careful review of the additional facts obtained on reconsideration, I conclude that the requirements of Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, have been met for workers at the subject firm. In accordance with the provisions of the Act, I make the following certification: All workers of Louisiana Pacific Corporation, OSB-Woodland, Baileyville, Maine, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after November 18, 2003 through January 10, 2006, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974. Signed in Washington, DC this 25th day of January 2005. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5-457 Filed 2-4-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-56,104] Pentair Pump, South Plant (Hydromatic), Subsidiary of Pentair, Inc., Ashland, OH; Notice of Termination of Certification This notice terminates the Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance issued by the Department on January 7, 2005, applicable to all workers of Pentair Pump, South Plant (Hydromatic), Subsidiary of Pentair, Inc., Ashland, Ohio. The notice will soon be published in the **Federal Register** . The Department, at the request of the State agency, reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm engaged in the production of sump and sewage water pumps. The State agency informed the Department that the worker group is covered by an existing certification, TA-W-51,215, that was issued on April 28, 2003. A review of the files shows that the petition certification for TA-W-51,215 was issued under the company name Hydromatic Pump in Ashland, Ohio, and remains in effect through April 28, 2005. Since the workers are currently covered by a certification and are eligible to apply for trade adjustment assistance, the Department is terminating the certification for TA-W-56,104. The petitioners are encouraged to file a new petition when the existing certification is nearing expiration. Since the basis for the certification is no longer valid, continuation of this certification would serve no purpose and the certification for workers of Pentair Pump, South Plant (Hydromatic), Subsidiary of Pentair, Inc., Ashland, Ohio, has been terminated. Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of January 2005. Linda G. Poole, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5-458 Filed 2-4-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-55,742] Rock-Tenn Company; OTSEGO, Michigan; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration By letter of December 14, 2004, a petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, applicable to workers of the subject firm. The Department's determination notice was signed on November 8, 2004 and published in the **Federal Register** on December 9, 2004 (69 FR 71428). The Department reviewed the request for reconsideration and has determined that the petitioner has provided additional information regarding subject firm's customers. Therefore, the Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974. Conclusion After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted. Signed at Washington, DC, this 25th day of January, 2005. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5-462 Filed 2-4-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-55,691] Royal Home Fashions Plant No. 6, Henderson, NC; Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration By application of November 22, 2004, a petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative determination regarding eligibility for workers and former workers of the subject firm to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance

(TAA)and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA). The denial notice was signed on October 25, 2004 and published in the **Federal Register** on November 12, 2004 (69 FR 65462). Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under the following circumstances:

(1)If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered that the determination complained of was erroneous;

(2)If it appears that the determination complained of was based on a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or

(3)If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a mis-interpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of the decision. The TAA petition, filed on behalf of workers at Royal Home Fashions, Plant No. 6, Henderson, North Carolina engaged in production of bedding (sheets, pillow cases, comforters, shams, etc.) was denied because it was determined that the declines in employment at the subject firm were predominantly caused by unrelated to imports circumstances. The petitioner alleges that the petitioning group of workers was in direct support of the Royal Home Fashions manufacturing facilities known as Plant No. 4 and Plant No. 2 in Henderson, North Carolina. The workers of these facilities were certified eligible for TAA on July 15, 2004 and August 24, 2004 respectively. A company official was contacted to verify whether workers at the subject facility were performing services for Plant No. 4 and Plant No. 2 during the relevant period. The company official stated that the subject facility serves as a distribution and warehousing facility and is in direct support of production for Plants No. 2 and No. 4 in Henderson, North Carolina. In accordance with Section 246 the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor herein presents the results of its investigation regarding certification of eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance

(ATAA)for older workers of Royal Home Fashions, Plant No. 6, Henderson, North Carolina. The group eligibility criteria for the ATAA program that the Department must consider under Section 246 of the Trade Act are: 1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are 50 years of age or older. 2. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are not easily transferable. 3. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry ( *i.e.* , conditions within the industry are adverse). The Department has determined that criterion 2 has not been met. The investigation revealed that the work performed by the petitioning group are easily transferable to other positions in the commuting area. Conclusion After careful review of the facts obtained in the investigation, I determine that increases of imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles produced by Royal Home Fashions, Henderson, North Carolina contributed importantly to the total or partial separation of workers and to the decline in sales or production at that firm or subdivision. In accordance with the provisions of the Act, I make the following certification: All workers of the Royal Home Fashions, Plant 6, Henderson, North Carolina who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after September 24, 2003 through two years from the date of this certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are denied eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974. Signed at Washington, DC, this 19th day of January, 2005. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5-461 Filed 2-4-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, (19 U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers (TA-W) number and alternative trade adjustment assistance

(ATAA)by (TA-W) number issued during the periods of January 2005. In order for an affirmative determination to be made and a certification of eligibility to apply for directly-impacted (primary) worker adjustment assistance to be issued, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. the sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision have decreased absolutely; and C. increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. there has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or subdivision to a foreign county of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or subdivision; and C. One of the following must be satisfied: 1. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United States; 2. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act; or 3. there has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are or were produced by such firm or subdivision. Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made and a certification of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance as an adversely affected secondary group to be issued, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met.

(1)Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers' firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated;

(2)the workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related to the article that was the basis for such certification; and

(3)Either—

(A)The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph

(2)accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or

(B)a loss or business by the workers' firm with the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph

(2)contributed importantly to the workers' separation or threat of separation. Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the criteria for eligibility have not been met for the reasons specified. The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B) (No shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met. *TA-W-56,156 & A; Spang and Co., Corporate Headquarters, Pittsburgh, PA and Magnetics, a div. of Spang and Company, Pittsburgh, PA* *TA-W-56,120; Seneca Foods Corporation, Vegetables Div., Walla Walla, WA* *TA-W-56,253; R.G. Barry Corporation, San Angelo, TX* *TA-W-56,240; Dorby Frocks, New York, NY* *TA-W-56,242; Lexington Precision Corp., Lexington Connector Seals, LaGrange, GA* *TA-W-56,284; Hickory Manor House, Sparta, North Carolina Operation, Sparta, NC* *TA-W-56,074; Klipstand Manufacturing Co., Inc., Westfield, MA* *TA-W-55,880; Pitney Bowes, Inc., Stanford, CT* The workers firm does not produce an article as required for certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974. *TA-W-56,238; Westpoint Stevens Bed, Bath and Linen Outlet Store, a Div. of Westpoint Stevens Stores, Inc., Myrtle Beach, SC* *TA-W-56,218; Veritest, a subsidiary of Lionbridge, Boise, ID* *TA-W-56,193; Midwestern Telecommunications, Inc., Homewood, IL* *TA-W-56,089; Netgear, Inc., Santa Clara, CA* *TA-W-56,231; New DHC, Inc., including on-site leased workers of Combined Management, Inc., Bangor, ME* *TA-W-56,183 & A; Sprint Corp., Sprint Business Solutions Div., Emerging and Mid-Markets, Tarboro, NC, Local Consumer Solutions, Rocky Mount, SC* *TA-W-56,294; Marsh Advantage America, Spartanburg, SC* *TA-W-56,209; Rocket Sales, Inc., Ridgewood, NY* *TA-W-56,167; Cigna Healthcare, Service Operations, Chattanooga, TN* *TA-W-56,287; Donnkenny Apparel, Inc., a subsidiary of Donnkenny, Inc., Wytheville, VA* *TA-W-56,181; Aladdin Industries, LLC, Corporate Headquarters, Nashville, TN* *TA-W-56,131; Independence Regional Health Center, Transcription Medical Records Div., a div. of HCA, Inc., Independence, MO* *TA-W-56,036; Sprint/United Management Co., SCS Content Center, Bolingbrook, IL* *TA-W-56,261; TAC Apparel, U.S. Operations Office, Weston, FL* The investigation revealed that criterion (a)(2)(A)(I.A) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A) (no employment decline) has not been met. *TA-W-56,112; Radisys, including leased workers of Employment Trends, Hillsboro, OR* *TA-W-56,184; Johnstown Corporation, Johnstown, PA* The investigation revealed that criterion (a)(2)(A)(I.B) (Sales or production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B) (has shifted production to a country not under the free trade agreement with U.S.) have not been met. *TA-W-56,025; Rockwell Collins, In-Flight Entertainment Div., Pomona, CA* *TA-W-56,142; Valenite LLC, Materials R&D, Troy, MI* *TA-W-56,152 & A; Flowline Div., of Markovitz Enterprises, Inc., New Castle, PA and Whiteville, NC* The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C) increased imports and (II.C) (has shifted production to a foreign country) have not been met. *TA-W-56,154; J.R. Greene, Inc., Boonton, NJ* *TA-W-56,255; Liz Claiborne, Inc., North Bergen, NJ* *TA-W-56,174; Maryland Specialty Wire, Inc., Cockeysville, MD* The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B) (Sales or production, or both, did not decline) and (II.C) (has shifted production to a foreign country) have not been met. *TA-W-56,108; Atlas Copco Compressors, Inc., Holyoke, MA* The investigation revealed that criteria

(2)has not been met. The workers firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier or downstream producer to trade-affected companies. *TA-W-56,001; Holophane Corp., Acuity Lighting Group, Newark, OH* *TA-W-56,111; New Dana Perfumes Corp., Mountaintop, PA* Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued; the date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of (a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of Section 222 have been met. *TA-W-56,090; American Falcon Corporation, Auburn, ME: November 23, 2003.* *TA-W-56,228; Hale Products, Inc., Conshohocken Div., Conshohocken, PA: December 16, 2003.* *TA-W-56,163; Gateway Hosiery Mills, Inc., Chattanooga, TN: December 1, 2003.* *TA-W-56,023; GDX North America, Inc., Wabash, IN: November 12, 2003.* *TA-W-56,097; Foley Wood Products, Inc., including on-site leased workers of Snelling Personnel Service and Express Personnel Service, Ellsworth, WI: November 23, 2003.* * TA-W-56,068; Metallic Ventures (US), Inc., a subsidiary of Metallic Ventures Gold, Inc., Hawthorne, NV: November 15, 2003. * *TA-W-56,071; Lambert Manufacturing Co., Inc., Glove Div., Plant 3, Chillicothe, MO: November 17, 2003.* *TA-W-56,221; Tien-Hu Knitting Co. (US), Inc., Oakland, CA: December 7, 2003.* *TA-W-56,232; CRH Catering Co., Inc., Workers at Anchor Glass Container Co, Connellsville, PA: December 16, 2003.* *TA-W-56,211; Silkworm, Inc., Andrews, SC: December 13, 2003.* *TA-W-56,073; Peake Plastics, Forest Hills, MD: November 23, 2003.* *TA-W-56,091; Eagle Ottawa, LLC, Grand Haven Div., Grand Haven, MI: November 8, 2003.* *TA-W-56,109; Bonifay Manufacturing, Inc., Bonifay, FL: November 30, 2003.* *TA-W-56,060; HCP Packaging USA, Bridgeport, CT: November 19, 2003.* *TA-W-56,150; Dicon Fiberoptics, Inc., Richmond, CA: November 22, 2003.* *TA-W-56,172; Cooper-Atkins Corp., Gainesville, FL: December 6, 2003.* *TA-W-56,113; Murray, Inc., Lawrenceburg, TN: November 15, 2003.* *TA-W-56,132; Floyd Manufacturing Co., Inc., East Berlin, CT: November 15, 2003.* *TA-W-56,054; Brown Manufacturing, Inc., Marion, North Carolina: November 15, 2003.* *TA-W-56,077; EDA Staffing, Workers at Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC, a/k/a On Semiconductor, East Greenwich Div., East Greenwich, RI: November 18, 2003.* *TA-W-56,078; Additional Contract Services, Workers at Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC, a/k/a On Semiconductor, East Greenwich Div., East Greenwich, RI: November 18, 2003.* *TA-W-56,079; Olsten Professional Staffing, Workers at Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC, East Greenwich Div., East Greenwich, RI: November 18, 2003.* *TA-W-56,315; Hitachi Magnetics Corp., Edmore, MI: January 4, 2005.* *TA-W-56,243; Hoffman Mills, Inc., Shippensburg, PA: December 16, 2003.* *TA-W-56,263; Mount Vernon Mills, Inc., Johnston, SC: January 4, 2005.* *TA-W-56,213; BMC Holding, Inc., Div. of Terra Industries, Beaumont, TX: November 30, 2003.* *TA-W-56,196; Stern Rubber Co., Staples, MN: December 10, 2003.* *TA-W-56,199; Tinnin Garment Co., Inc., Fredericktown, MO: December 13, 2003.* *TA-W-56,206; Essilor of America, St. Petersburg, FL: December 6, 2003.* *TA-W-56,057; Quaker Fabric Corporation, Plant C, Design Group, Fall River, MA: November 18, 2003.* *TA-W-56,134; Tyco Electronics, Power Components

(B)(shift in production) of Section 222 have been met. *TA-W-56,081; Starkey Laboratories, Glencoe, MN: September 12, 2004.* *TA-W-56,220; ITW Shakeproof, Guttenberg, IA: December 14, 2003.* *TA-W-56,128; UFE, Inc., River Falls Molding Div., River Falls, WI: November 3, 2003.* *TA-W-56,203; Metalforming Technologies, Inc., Safety Systems Div., including on-site leased workers of Adecco, Burton, MI: December 9, 2003.* *TA-W-56,188; Symbol Technologies, Inc., Operations Division, including on-site leased workers of Next Source, Bohemia, NY: November 10, 2003.* *TA-W-56,178; Electrolux Home Products, St. Cloud, MN: December 7, 2003.* *TA-W-56,137; Gates Corp., Hose and Connectors Div., Galesburg Facility, a subsidiary of Tomkins, PLC, Galesburg, IL: December 2, 2003.* *TA-W-56,138 & A; Money's Foods U.S., Inc., Fennville, MI and Howe, IN: November 24, 2003.* *TA-W-56,147; Innovex, Inc., including on-site leased workers of The Work Connection, Maple Plain, MN: December 2, 2003.* *TA-W-56,158; Square D/Schneider Electric, Columbia, MO: January 4, 2005.* *TA-W-56,162; Visteon Systems, LLC, 6MM Condenser Operations, Connersville, IN: December 10, 2003.* *TA-W-56,168; AG Communication Systems, a div. of Lucent Technologies, Genoa, IL: December 3, 2003.* *TA-W-56,101; Concord Fabrics, Inc., including on-site leased workers of Randstad Staffing, Milledgeville, GA: June 18, 2004.* *TA-W-56,072; Fiberconn Assemblies, Inc, Lodan Totowa Div., a subsidiary of Emerson, Telephone Services, Inc., Totowa, NJ: November 19, 2003.* *TA-W-56,104; Pentair Pump, South Plant (Hydromatic), subsidiary of Pentair, Inc., Ashland, OH: November 15, 2003.* *TA-W-56,269; STS Weaving, LLC, St. Albans, VT: December 29, 2003.* *TA-W-56,244; Children's Group, Inc., Magic Cabin Div., Viroqua, WI: December 16, 2003.* *TA-W-56,245; Randstad North America, Workers at Schnadig Corp., 101-Cornelia Div., Cornelia, GA: December 20, 2003.* *TA-W-56,212 & A; Keystone Restyling Products, Production Facility, Toledo, OH and Shipping/Receiving Warehouse, Toledo, OH: December 7, 2003.* *TA-W-56,153; Bredero Shaw LLC, a subsidiary of Shawcor, Inc., including leased workers of ACO Employment, Clark Personnel and Longs, Theodore, AL: December 2, 2003.* *TA-W-56,166; The Lilli Group, Inc., South Hackensack, NJ: December 6, 2003.* *TA-W-56,197; Designer's Group International, Designer's Group, Inc., a div of Chippenhook, including on-site leased workers of Randstad Staffing and Staffing Consultants, North Stonington, CT: December 9, 2003.* *TA-W-56,176; Spirit Manufacturing Co., Inc., Jonesboro, AR: December 7, 2003.* *TA-W-56,198; Specialty Electronics, Inc., Landrum, SC: December 10, 2003.* *TA-W-56,233; Celestica, San Jose, CA: December 6, 2003.* *TA-W-56,136; Gretagmacbeth, LLC, Production/Assembly, New Windsor, NY: June 8, 2004.* *TA-W-56,283; Service Manufacturing, Weslaco, TX: December 13, 2003.* *TA-W-56,297; Dicey Mills, Inc., Shelby, NC: January 3, 2004.* *TA-W-56,148; Ozark Electronics, Cullman Alabama, Inc., a subsidiary of Ozark Electronics Repair, Inc., including on-site leased workers of Cullman Employment Center, Cullman, AL: December 2003.* *TA-W-56,059; Louisiana Pacific Corp., OSB-Woodland, Baileyville, ME: November 18, 2003.* *TA-W-56,139; Interdynamics, Inc., Brooklyn, NY: December 3, 2003.* *TA-W-56,217; Kyocera Wireless Corp., a subsidiary of Kyocera International, including leased workers of Manpower Staffing Services, San Diego, CA: December 12, 2003.* The following certifications have been issued. The requirement of upstream supplier to a trade certified primary firm has been met. *TA-W-55,877; Electronic Data Systems, on-site leased workers at Maxtor Corporation, Longmont, CA: October 21, 2003.* *TA-W-55,978; Shakespeare Co., LLC, Monofilament Div., Columbia, SC: November 5, 2003.* Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issued a certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

(ATAA)for older workers, the group eligibility requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met. In the following cases, it has been determined that the requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(ii) have not been met for the reasons specified. The Department as determined that criterion

(2)of Section 246 has not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily transferable. *TA-W-56,082; Cooper Tire and Rubber Co., Inner Tube Associates, Clarksdale, MS* *TA-W-56,301; Diamond Products, St. Paul, MN* *TA-W-56,217; Kyocera Wireless Corp., a subsidiary of Kyocera International, including leased workers of Manpower Staffing Services, San Diego, CA* *TA-W-56,139; Interdynamics, Inc., Brooklyn, NY* *TA-W-56,059; Louisiana Pacific Corporation, OSB—Woodland, Baileyville, ME* *TA-W-55,978; Shakespeare Co., LLC, Monofilament Div., Columbia, SC* *TA-W-56,062; Express Personnel, Workers at Cooper Standard Automotive, North American Sealing Systems, Griffin, GA* *TA-W-54,164; Maida Development Co., including leased workers of Integrity Staffing Services, Hampton, VA* *TA-W-53,119; Orrco, Inc., Killbuck, OH* *TA-W-52,909; Dolly, Inc., including leased workers of CBS Personnel and Express Personnel, Tipp City, OH* *TA-W-54,033; Aluminum Color Industries, Inc., Lowellville, OH* *TA-W-53,699; Tomlinson Industries, Cleveland, OH* The Department as determined that criterion

(1)of Section 246 has not been met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of age or older. *TA-W-56,148; Ozark Electronics Cullman Alabama, Inc., a subsidiary of Ozark Electronics Repair, Inc., including on-site leased workers of Cullman Employment Center, Cullman, AL* Since the workers are denied eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA. *TA-W-56,231; New DHC, Inc., including on-site leased workers of Combined Management, Inc., Bangor, ME* *TA-W-56,183 & A; Sprint Corp., Sprint Business Solutions Div., Emerging and Mid-Markets, Tarboro, NC and Local Consumer Solutions, Rock Mount, NC* *TA-W-56,294; Marsh Advantage America, Spartanburg, SC* *TA-W-56,209; Rocket Sales, Inc., Ridgewood, NY* *TA-W-56,167; Cigna Healthcare, Service Operations, Chattanooga, TN* *TA-W-56,287; Donnkenny Apparel, Inc., a subsidiary of Donnkenny, Inc., Wytheville, VA* *TA-W-56,181; Aladdin Industries, LLC, Corporate Headquarters, Nashville, TN* *TA-W-56,131; Independence Regional Health Center, Transcription Medical Records Division, a Division of HCA, Inc., Independence, MO* *TA-W-56,036; Sprint/United Management Co., SCS Content, Boilingbrook, IL* *TA-W-56,261; TAC Apparel, U.S. Operations Office, Weston, FL* *TA-W-56,156 & A; Spang and Company, Corporate Headquarters, Pittsburgh, PA and Magnetics, a Division of Spang and Company, Pittsburgh, PA* *TA-W-56,120; Seneca Foods Corporation, Vegetables Division, Walla Walla, WA* *TA-W-56,253; R.G. Barry Corp., San Angelo, TX* *TA-W-56,240; Dorby Frocks, New York, NY* *TA-W-56,242; Lexington Precision Corporation, Lexington Connector Seals, LaGrange, GA* *TA-W-56,284; Hickory Manor House, Sparta, North Carolina Operation, Sparta, NC* *TA-W-56,074; Klipstand Manufacturing Co., Inc., Westfield, MA* *TA-W-55,889; Pitney Bowes, Inc., Stanford, CT* *TA-W-56,112; Radisys, including leased workers of Employment Trends, Hillsboro, OR* *TA-W-56,184; Johnstown Corporation, Johnstown, PA* *TA-W-56,025; Rockwell Collins In-flight Entertainment Div., Pomona, CA* *TA-W-56,142; Valenite LLC, Materials R&D, Troy, MI* *TA-W-56,152 & A; Flowline Div. of Markovitz Enterprises, Inc., New Castle, PA and Whiteville, NC* *TA-W-56,154; J.R. Greene, Inc., Boonton, NJ* *TA-W-56,255; Liz Claiborne, Inc., North Bergen, NJ* *TA-W-56,174; Maryland Specialty Wire, Inc., Cockeysville, MD* *TA-W-56,001; Holophane Corporation, Acuity Lighting Group, Newark, OH* *TA-W-56,111; New Dana Perfumes Corp., Mountaintop, PA* *TA-W-56,108; Atlas Copco Compressors, Inc., Holyoke, MA* Affirmative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issued a certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

(ATAA)for older workers, the group eligibility requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met. The following certifications have been issued; the date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determinations. In the following cases, it has been determined that the requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(ii) have been met. I. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are 50 years of age or older. II. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are not easily transferable. III. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry ( *i.e.,* conditions within the industry are adverse). *TA-W-56,090; American Falcon Corporation, Auburn, ME: November 23, 2003.* *TA-W-56,228; Hale Products, Inc., Conshohocken Div., Conshohocken, PA: December 16, 2003.* *TA-W-56,163; Gateway Hosiery Mills, Inc., Chattanooga, TN: December 1, 2003.* *TA-W-56,023; GDX North America, Inc., Wabash, IN: November 12, 2003.* *TA-W-56,097; Foley Wood Products, Inc., including on-site leased workers of Snelling Personnel Service and Express Personnel Service, Ellsworth, WI: November 23, 2003.* *TA-W-56,068; Metallic Ventures (US), Inc., a subsidiary of Metallic Ventures Gold, Inc., Hawthorne, NV: November 15, 2003.* *TA-W-56,071; Lambert Manufacturing Co., Inc., Glove Div., Plant 3, Chillicothe, MO: November 17, 2003.* *TA-W-56,221; Tien-Hu Knitting Co. (US), Inc., Oakland, CA: December 7, 2003.* *TA-W-56,232; CRH Catering Co., Inc., Workers at Anchor Glass Container Co, Connellsville, PA: December 16, 2003.* *TA-W-56,211; Silkworm, Inc., Andrews, SC: December 13, 2003.* *TA-W-56,073; Peake Plastics, Forest Hills, MD: November 23, 2003.* *TA-W-56,091; Eagle Ottawa, LLC, Grand Haven Div., Grand Haven, MI: November 8, 2003.* *TA-W-56,109; Bonifay Manufacturing, Inc., Bonifay, FL: November 30, 2003.* *TA-W-56,060; HCP Packaging USA, Bridgeport, CT: November 19, 2003.* *TA-W-56,150; Dicon Fiberoptics, Inc., Richmond, CA: November 22, 2003.* *TA-W-56,172; Cooper-Atkins Corp., Gainesville, FL: December 6, 2003.* *TA-W-56,113; Murray, Inc., Lawrenceburg, TN: November 15, 2003.* *TA-W-56,132; Floyd Manufacturing Co., Inc., East Berlin, CT: November 15, 2003.* *TA-W-56,054; Brown Manufacturing, Inc., Marion, North Carolina: November 15, 2003.* *TA-W-56,077; EDA Staffing, Workers at Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC, a/k/a On Semiconductor, East Greenwich Div., East Greenwich, RI: November 18, 2003.* *TA-W-56,078; Additional Contract Services, Workers at Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC, a/k/a On Semiconductor, East Greenwich Div., East Greenwich, RI: November 18, 2003.* *TA-W-56,079; Olsten Professional Staffing, Workers at Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC, East Greenwich Div., East Greenwich, RI: November 18, 2003.* *TA-W-56,315; Hitachi Magnetics Corp., Edmore, MI: January 4, 2005.* *TA-W-56,243; Hoffman Mills, Inc., Shippensburg, PA: December 16, 2003.* *TA-W-56,263; Mount Vernon Mills, Inc., Johnston, SC: January 4, 2005.* *TA-W-56,213; BMC Holding, Inc., Div. of Terra Industries, Beaumont, TX: November 30, 2003.* *TA-W-56,196; Stern Rubber Co., Staples, MN: December 10, 2003.* *TA-W-56,199; Tinnin Garment Co., Inc., Fredericktown, MO: December 13, 2003.* *TA-W-56,206; Essilor of America, St. Petersburg, FL: December 6, 2003.* *TA-W-56,057; Quaker Fabric Corporation, Plant C, Design Group, Fall River, MA: November 18, 2003.* *TA-W-56,134; Tyco Electronics, Power Components

(COEV)Div., Watertown, SD: December 2, 2003.* *TA-W-56,175; New Time Garment Manufacturing, San Francisco, CA: December 6, 2003.* *TA-W-56,192; Douglas Battery Manufacturing Co., including on-site leased workers of Temporary Resources, Adecco and CPI, Winston-Salem, NC: December 8, 2003.* *TA-W-56,053; Gilman Engineering and Manufacturing Co. LLC, including on-site leased workers of Van Marter and Associates, inc., Advanced Project Services LLC, Techstaff of Milwaukee, Inc., Argus and Associates, Inc., and Hantech LLC, Janesville, WI: November 6, 2004.* *TA-W-56,178; Electrolux Home Products, St. Cloud, MN: December 7, 2003.* *TA-W-56,137; Gates Corp., Hose and Connectors Div., Galesburg Facility, a subsidiary of Tomkins, PLC, Galesburg, IL: December 2, 2003.* *TA-W-56,138 & A; Money's Foods U.S., Inc., Fennville, MI and Howe, IN: November 24, 2003.* *TA-W-56,147; Innovex, Inc., including on-site leased workers of The Work Connection, Maple Plain, MN: December 2, 2003.* *TA-W-56,158; Square D/Schneider Electric, Columbia, MO: January 4, 2005.* *TA-W-56,162; Visteon Systems, LLC, 6MM Condenser Operations, Connersville, IN: December 10, 2003.* *TA-W-56,168; AG Communication Systems, a div. of Lucent Technologies, Genoa, IL: December 3, 2003.* *TA-W-56,101; Concord Fabrics, Inc., including on-site leased workers of Randstad Staffing, Milledgeville, GA: June 18, 2004.* *TA-W-56,072; Fiberconn Assemblies, Inc., Lodan Totowa Div., a subsidiary of Emerson, Telephone Services, Inc., Totowa, NJ: November 19, 2003.* *TA-W-56,104; Pentair Pump, South Plant (Hydromatic), subsidiary of Pentair, Inc., Ashland, OH: November 15, 2003.* *TA-W-56,269; STS Weaving, LLC, St. Albans, VT: December 29, 2003.* *TA-W-56,244; Children's Group, Inc., Magic Cabin Div., Viroqua, WI: December 16, 2003.* *TA-W-56,245; Randstad North America, Workers at Schnadig Corp., 101-Cornelia Div., Cornelia, GA: December 20, 2003.* *TA-W-56,212 & A; Keystone Restyling Products, Production Facility, Toledo, OH and Shipping/Receiving Warehouse, Toledo, OH: December 7, 2003.* *TA-W-56,153; Bredero Shaw LLC, a subsidiary of Shawcor, Inc., including leased workers of ACO Employment, Clark Personnel and Longs, Theodore, AL: December 2, 2003.* *TA-W-56,166; The Lilli Group, Inc., South Hackensack, NJ: December 6, 2003.* *TA-W-56,197; Designer's Group International, Designer's Group, Inc., a div of Chippenhook, including on-site leased workers of Randstad Staffing and Staffing Consultants, North Stonington, CT: December 9, 2003.* *TA-W-56,176; Spirit Manufacturing Co., Inc., Jonesboro, AR: December 7, 2003.* *TA-W-56,198; Specialty Electronics, Inc., Landrum, SC: December 10, 2003.* *TA-W-56,233; Celestica, San Jose, CA: December 6, 2003.* *TA-W-56,136; Gretagmacbeth, LLC, Production/Assembly, New Windsor, NY: June 8, 2004.* *TA-W-56,283; Service Manufacturing, Weslaco, TX: December 13, 2003.* *TA-W-56,297; Dicey Mills, Inc., Shelby, NC: January 3, 2004.* *TA-W-55,877; Electronic Data Systems, on-site leased workers at Maxtor Corp., Longmont, CA: October 21, 2003.* *TA-W-55,314 & A; The Production Department, Confluence, PA and Gateway Sportswear Corp., a subsidiary of The Production Department, Confluence, PA: February 11, 2003 through March 26, 2006.* *TA-W-52,443; Formica Corp., Evendale Facility, Cincinnati, OH: July 31, 2002 through August 8, 2005.* *TA-W-52,072; Colson Associates, Inc., a div. of Colson Caster Corporation, Jonesboro, AR: June 16, 2002 through August 15, 2005.* *TA-W-52,453; National Metal Abrasives, Inc., Wadsworth, OH: July 30, 2002 through September 3, 2005.* *TA-W-53,264; Burlington House Finishing, a div. of Burlington House, Burlington, NC: October 10, 2002 through November 13, 2005.* *TA-W-54,335; Fiber Industries, Inc., a subsidiary of Wellman, Inc., including leased workers of Pinnacle Staffing and BE&K, Charlotte, NC: February 10, 2003 through March 26, 2006.* *TA-W-54,249; VF Jeanswear Limited Partnership, a subsidiary of VF Corp., Irvington, AL: February 12, 2003 through March 11, 2006.* *TA-W-52,951; T&W Forge, Inc., div. of Durrell Corp., Alliance, OH: August 29, 2002.* *TA-W-53,921; Pac-Tec, Inc., d/b/a Ray-O-Lite Pavement Markers & Palm-N-Turn, including leased workers of Diversivied Services Group, Heath, OH: December 19, 2002 through January 27, 2006.* *TA-W-54,661; Gordon Garment, div. of AH Schreiber Co., Inc., Bristol, VA: March 23, 2003 through May 12, 2006.* *TA-W-54,332; Springs Industries, Inc., Bedding Div., Lyman Finishing Plant, Lyman, SC: February 12, 2003 through March 24, 2006.* *TA-W-53,183; Group Seven Systems, Inc., Lenoir, NC: October 3, 2002 through November 19, 2005.* *TA-W-52,809; Janef, Inc. T/A Alperin Mayflower, Old Forge, PA: August 14, 2002 through October 3, 2005.* *TA-W-52,340; RST&B Curtain and Drapery, Florence, SC: July 17, 2002 through August 6, 2005.* *TA-W-53,227; Voith Paper, Voith Paper Service Southeast Div., Salisbury, NC: October 13, 2002 through November 5, 2005.* *TA-W-52,349; Terry Apparel, a/k/a Mariana Apparel, Mariana, AR: July 18, 2002 through August 8, 2005.* *TA-W-53,517; Howell Penncraft, Howell, MI: October 28, 2002 through December 8, 2005.* *TA-W-53,096; H. Warshow and Sons, Inc., Milton, PA: September 17, 2002 through November 21, 2005.* *TA-W-52,708; Carolina Pad and Paper, Charlotte, NC: August 25, 2002 through September 25, 2005.* *TA-W-53,410; Nidec America Corp., ADF Div. Canton, MA: October 28, 2002 through December 4, 2005* I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the month of January 2005. Copies of these determinations are available for inspection in Room C-5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 during normal business hours or will be mailed to persons who write to the above address. Date: January 28, 2005. Timothy Sullivan, Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5-463 Filed 2-4-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA-W-55,820A] Thermal and Interior Vandalia Operations of Delphi Corporation, Vandalia, OH; Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at Thermal and Interior, Vandalia Operations of Delphi Corporation, Vandalia, Ohio. The application contained no new substantial information which would bear importantly on the Department's determination. Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued. TA-W-55,820A; Thermal and Interior, Vandalia Operations of Delphi Corporation, Vandalia, Ohio (January 31, 2005). Signed at Washington, DC this 31st day of January 2005. Timothy Sullivan, Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5-455 Filed 2-4-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION [Notice: 05—018] Notice of Information Collection Under OMB Review AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). ACTION: Notice of information collection under OMB review. SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). DATES: All comments should be submitted within 30 calendar days from the date of this publication. ADDRESSES: All comments should be addressed to Desk Officer for NASA; Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs; Room 10236; New Executive Office Building; Washington, DC 20503. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or copies of the information collection instrument(s) and instructions should be directed to Ms. Kathy Shaeffer, Acting NASA Reports Officer, NASA Headquarters, 300 E Street SW., Mail Code V, Washington, DC 20546,

(202)358-1230, *kshaeff1@hq.nasa.gov* . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Abstract The National Aeronautics and Space Administration

(NASA)is requesting renewal of an existing collection that is used to ensure the proper disposition of rights to inventions made in the course of NASA-funded research. With this collection NASA tracks all inventions that are disclosed by grant recipients. Information is required to ensure the proper disposition of rights to inventions made in the course of NASA-funded research. The requirement is codified in 14 CFR 1260.28. The legislative authorities are 43 U.S.C. 2451 *et seq.* , and 35 U.S.C. 200 *et seq.* Grant provisions require that recipients include a list of all inventions required to be disclosed in their annual Performance Report. II. Method of Collection NASA utilizes paper and electronic methods to collect information from collection respondents. III. Data *Title:* Patents—Grants and Cooperative Agreements. *OMB Number:* 2700-0048. *Type of review:* Revision of a currently approved collection. *Affected Public:* Not-for-profit institutions; Business or other for-profit; State, local, or tribal government. *Estimated Number of Respondents:* 8128. *Estimated Time Per Response:* ranges from 1/3 hour to 8 hours per response. *Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:* 15,137. *Estimated Total Annual Cost:* $0. IV. Request for Comments Comments are invited on:

(1)Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of NASA, including whether the information collected has practical utility;

(2)the accuracy of NASA's estimate of the burden (including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information;

(3)ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and

(4)ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including automated collection techniques or the use of other forms of information technology. Dated: January 31, 2005. Patricia L. Dunnington, Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 05-2294 Filed 2-4-05; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 3

Traces to 3 documents

U.S. Code

6 references not yet in our index

29 CFR 90.18(C)
29 CFR 90.18(c)
26 USC 2813
Pub. L. 104-13
14 CFR 1260.28
43 USC 2451

Citation graph

cites case law

Notices

Notice of information collection under OMB review

U.S.C.§ 2273

U.S.C.§ 3506

U.S.C.§ 200

Cite29 CFR 90.18(C)

Cite29 CFR 90.18(c)

Cite26 USC 2813

Pub. L.Pub. L. 104-13

Cite14 CFR 1260.28

Cites 9 · showing 8Cited by 0 across 0 sources