Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2005-01-31 · Department of Veterans Affairs · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Withdrawal of proposed rule

261 words·~1 min read·/register/2005/01/31/05-1704

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4810-31-P DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 38 CFR Part 3 RIN 2900-AK97 Time Limit for Requests for De Novo Review AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs. ACTION: Withdrawal of proposed rule. SUMMARY: In a document published in the **Federal Register** at 67 FR 10866 on March 11, 2002, the Department of Veterans Affairs
(VA)proposed to amend its adjudication regulations concerning the time a claimant has in which to request a *de novo* review of a decision at the Veterans Service Center level after filing a Notice of Disagreement. This document withdraws that proposed rule. DATES: The proposed rule is withdrawn as of January 31, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maya Ferrandino, Consultant, Policy and Regulations Staff, Compensation and Pension Service, Veterans Benefits Administration, 810 Vermont Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20420, telephone
(202)273-7232. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Currently, a claimant who disagrees with a decision by a Veterans Service Center may appeal that decision by filing a notice of disagreement (NOD). Under 38 CFR 3.2600, a claimant who has filed a timely NOD may also obtain *de novo* review of the decision of the Veterans Service Center by requesting such review with the NOD or within 60 days after the date that VA mails notice of the availability of *de novo* review. We proposed reducing that 60-day period to 15 days. However, we have determined that revision of the *de novo* review process is unnecessary at this time. Therefore, we are withdrawing the proposal. Approved: December 17, 2004. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs. [FR Doc. 05-1704 Filed 1-28-05; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 38 CFR 3
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Withdrawal of proposed rule
Cite38 CFR 3
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.